I was dating a woman 20 years younger then I until recently.
(Before you get too excited about this story, I'm 50)
I'm in very good physical shape and didn't have any physiological problems,
other then being a little intimidated. I was suddenly single and dating again.
My doctor had written me a prescription for Viagra with out asking a lot of uncomfortable questions, and the stuff is absolutely incredible!
I know that stamina is not a substitute for skill in these matters,
but I can't help wondering if I should admit to my partners that at least part of my talent is chemical rather then chemistry.
I'm about to become intimate with a new lover, and I wonder if I should mention it.
Would you be upset if you found out your lover was using performance inhancements and didn't tell you??
I see no reason not to tell her you use Viagra. It is really no big deal. I remind my lover to take his - we even discuss the timing of it to be sure he is in full gear when we both think he will most likely need it. These days I'd half expect any guy over 50 to be using it.
One reason to tell her is that if you haven't taken it and she doesn't get the response from you she expects - she can blame it on the Viagra not yet taking hold - otherwise she might take it personally.
Susan
Marcucco (no login)
Re: Re: Do we 'do' sexual ethics here?
March 17 2004, 4:59 PM
Getting an erection was never a problem, I suppose it's partly a vanity issue, but there's more to it then that. The stuff really enhances stamina. It allows the man a much quicker recovery, and on a good night, eliminates recovery all together. I know that as a guy, I certainly take credit when my partner has multiple orgasms and is ready to go again. I always felt that women took a certain amount of credit for their partners performance too. I was concerned that a woman might be disappointed if she found out it was chemical rather then chemistry.
You wouldn't be, not at all?