<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

SCOTTS of STOW

August 13 2004 at 9:37 PM
 

 
I have just received the Autumn 2004 edition of Scotts sales catalogue and am very pleased to note that all their products are described in Imperial dimensions. The only reference to metric that I have found is for a 1.8-litre kettle, but even this is shown as being 9"x8" diameter. If only I could afford it, I would certainly buy from Scotts who can be found on the web at www.scottsofstow.co.uk

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

SCOTTS OF STOW

August 26 2004, 2:14 PM 

Is it not the usual 1.7l kettle? I.e. 3 pints?
Anyone know where one can get a kettle with a water gauge measured in english?
S.Cruple

 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

August 27 2004, 4:40 PM 

His kettle seems to be 64 fluidounce. An Interesting, if non-Imperial, number.

 
 
Stan

1.8 L kettle

August 30 2004, 10:24 PM 

I see.

What was the stated power rating? Was it in horse power by any chance?

What about other electrical appliances?

Did you happen to notice any of the normal electrical units such as amps, volts and watts?

All metric you know!

 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

August 31 2004, 12:57 PM 

I'm not even going there!


 
 
martin

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

August 31 2004, 1:15 PM 

Stan wrote

<<
Did you happen to notice any of the normal electrical units such as amps, volts and watts?

All metric you know!
>>

And named and introduced into the metric system by the British!


 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

August 31 2004, 2:11 PM 

Electrical units are the one weakness of Imprial for science. Big deal. I don't really see how that is relevant to our discussion.

 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

August 31 2004, 2:13 PM 

Or the fact that many of these discoveries were found before metric's emergence?

(I didn't want to "go there")

 
 
martin

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

August 31 2004, 6:42 PM 

Bryan wrote

<<
Electrical units are the one weakness of Imprial for science.
>>

One of James Clerk Maxwell's lasting contributions to science was the realisation that one should use the same units for energy regardless of whether that energy was electrical, mechanical, thermal, chemical etc. He also had the foresight to relasise that the metric system was the best system to use so he used his chairmanship of the British Association for the Advancement of Science to hijack the control of the metric system from the French and give it British leadership.

 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 1 2004, 8:00 AM 

And in doing so, he helped popularize the French system the world over, making it difficult for British scientists to communicate with those in other countries. In effect, he made science harder for Britain by forcing British scientists to use one system for electricity and current and another system for other measurements, and at the same time did a service to the French by providing them with a unified system.

 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 1 2004, 12:58 PM 

bit of a traitor then.

Maybe we can now ditch the "metric is more british than french" line

 
 
martin

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 1 2004, 9:16 PM 

Many of the SI units were named after prominent engineers or scientists. Which countries do they come from?

Britain - 6
Germany - 4
France - 3
Others - 5

Note - Britain has twice as many as France!!!!!!!!

 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 2 2004, 1:24 PM 

Note - You've still missed the point !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 

SCOTTS OF STOW

September 13 2004, 10:18 PM 

Parry wrote:
Re: SCOTTS of STOW August 27 2004, 4:40 PM

His kettle seems to be 64 fluidounce. An Interesting, if non-Imperial, number.

This would appear to be half a gallon, or two quarts or 4 pints US style.

==========

As for all this bollo' about Sick Infidel Units being named after Brits, who cares? No-one's suggesting using anthing other than metric for science.

Who were Mr Gram and Mr metre? And why when i ask for a KILO of apples do I only get 9 and not 1000. There's metric shrinkage for you.


 
 
metre

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 15 2004, 7:32 AM 

As for all this bollo' about Sick Infidel Units being named after Brits, who cares? No-one's suggesting using anthing other than metric for science.

SCruple:
Who were Mr Gram and Mr metre? And why when i ask for a KILO of apples do I only get 9 and not 1000. There's metric shrinkage for you.

metre:
That's the result of leaving computers unattended in pre-school.

 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 15 2004, 12:59 PM 

Eric,

"Kilo" means "thousands of" in metric.
Does that help?

 
 
Beranger

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 16 2004, 12:58 AM 

Steve

When I ask for "a quarter of wine gums" (in imperial land) I only get 4oz. More imperial downsizing!!!

Isn't there another board where the imperial side claim that "Quarter" & "Quarter" cannot be confused?

Asking for a kilo of apples and "expecting" 1000 (number) compares with some of the most extreme opinions on the whole board.

As penance, I hope you will drink Bacardi Breezers and American "beer" all night at your wedding!

Tut, tut - I expected better from a "moderate"!!! :-) :-) :-)




 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 16 2004, 1:18 PM 

Tut Tut!

I expect for you to see straight through my sense of humour by now!!!

BTW - it'll be Strongbows on the night, I can tell you!

And don't worry, one of the guests/friends is a doctor - and he's promised to give me a little present on the night.

I'll leave that up to your imagination, but as a clue - its definitely a metric measurement!

Now LEAVE IT THERE!!!!

 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 16 2004, 1:51 PM 

A gram? of Coke? Flubby hell. I hate recreational drug use, by the way. Fear my new right credentials.

 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 16 2004, 2:24 PM 

Yeah, that's right - doctors go around with a supply of coke readily to hand.

OOOH! You were talking about "student" doctors!

;-)

 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 16 2004, 7:55 PM 

Damn my student mind. Of course, you wouldn't be able to admit to it being coke as this is online and you would get caught and arrested. So I take that non-denial as an admission.

 
 
SteveH

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

September 17 2004, 12:53 PM 

Maybe I was being too subtle.

Re-read my post.

Now think "perscription drugs"

Hmmm?

Hmmm?

Need another clue?

 
 
Anonymous

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

December 16 2004, 12:17 PM 

Viagra?

 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

December 16 2004, 1:39 PM 

Doctor friends can give you ---anything--- !!!

Shh!

 
 
Anonymous

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

December 17 2004, 10:26 AM 

It is a proven fact that persistent use of imperial measurements causes impotence.

If only you had embraced the metric revolution, your old fella would have been raring to go on your wedding night without needing chemical assistance.

 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

December 17 2004, 12:21 PM 

No assistance required, mate!

If you were handed some - wouldn't you be curious?

Even if it just meant that you didn't need to use your hand to open doors?

Anyways - time to switch the subject!!!

 
 
Tony Bennett

Impotence is the Cause, not the Effect - so try UKIP instead of Viagra

December 18 2004, 12:20 AM 

re: "It's a proven fact that using imperial measurements causes impotence".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

REPLY: I think you have misunderstood this quote that appears on the BWMA website:

"If so then, sadly, our *imperial measures have been terminated* and the brave 'metric martyrs' may lose their livelihoods. But if Parliament has retained its sovereignty, then the compulsory metrication regulations are indeed unlawful - and the convictions of the metric martyrs must be quashed.

Can we trust the judges on Monday to reaffirm the promises made by past ministers that we really do still govern ourselves? Or has the past been sold and is *Parliament consigned to impotence forever*, a mere province of the European super-power? Shall the battle go the House of Lords, even to the European courts?"

So, it appears that it is Parliamentary impotence that is causing the termination of imperial measurements.

Just as Viagra helps to deal with impotence, so the U.K. Independence Party (if elected) can deal with an impotent Parliament, making it a potent force once again










 
 

Re: SCOTTS of STOW

December 18 2004, 3:52 PM 

<<so the U.K. Independence Party (if elected)>>


I am soooooo glad you didn't miss-spell that!

Anyway - I did my *bit* at the last euro elections.



Hey! This thread has enough tangents to make eric proud!!!

 
 
Current Topic - SCOTTS of STOW  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement