GLEN AVALON
LOG IN SEARCH POST NEW MESSAGE HEADLINES MIMI !! DIVERSIONS MEDITATIONS BIORHYTHMS
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  

Iran - U.S. "disgusting" and "not competent"

September 26 2001 at 6:20 PM
Joseph 

 
September 26, 2001
Iranian Leader Says Country Won't Help U.S. on Afghanistan
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 10:47 a.m. ET


TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's supreme leader ruled out Iranian help for any U.S.-led attack on neighboring Afghanistan, saying Wednesday that the United States was not ``competent'' to lead a global campaign and calling U.S. behavior ``disgusting.''

In a state-run television address to the nation, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the U.S. administration was ``over-expectant'' in wanting the whole world to help it following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

``Iran will not participate in any move under U.S. leadership. Iran will not extend any assistance to the U.S. and its allies in attacking the already suffering Muslim neighboring Afghanistan,'' Khamenei said in an address to families of soldiers killed in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war.

America's behavior, by expecting help but not earning the respect of other nations, was ``disgusting,'' Khamenei said, adding that Iran did not consider the United States ``competent and sincere (enough) to lead any global campaign against terrorism.'' He did not elaborate.

Khamenei's remarks were the clearest made yet by Iran in response to suggestions that Washington may call on Iran to join a U.S.-led global force to fight terrorism. Iran considers the United States its biggest enemy, but a strong reform movement in the government favors warming ties with the West. Washington has put Iran on a list of nations supporting terrorism.

During the past few days, Iran expressed its opposition to unilateral retaliatory U.S. military strikes against the Taliban, who harbor Osama bin Laden, the prime suspect in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Iran has called for an international anti-terror coalition led by the United Nations -- not Washington.

In his speech, Khamenei, the leader of hard-liners opposed to reforms, also rejected America's declaration to the world that nations had to choose between being ``with us or terrorism.''

``We are not with you,'' he said. ``At the same time, we are not with terrorists. America is not sincere in fighting terrorism. It has other objectives. America's hands are stained with all the crimes committed by the Zionist regime,'' he said.

Iran, which steadfastly opposes Israel in its occupation of Palestinian territories and use of military force against Palestinian protesters, accuses Washington of being biased toward the Jewish state.

The United States wants Mideast support -- from use of military installations or airspace to intelligence -- as it builds forces for an expected assault on bin Laden's operations in Afghanistan.








 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Xia

What?!?!

September 30 2001, 12:24 AM 

They don't like us, do they?

Oh well....you can't please every one. Right?

 
 Respond to this message   
mommasohn

Untitled

October 2 2001, 8:38 PM 

Well, isn't it true? Don't we pamper Israel? Didn't we even endorse its creation? Don't we favor and protect it? Isn't Israel religiously intolerant? Didn't/doesn't it dispossess people who lived there first? We jump on the militant Palestinians, but we only whine about the militant Zionist... so... aren't they right? Why are we surprised?

If Massachusetts went back to Puritans only the constitution would be waved. What can Islam wave but its protests and the frustrated acting outs of the heretics.

Isn't the treatment of the Palestinians/Israelies the same as the Native Americans/settlers?

Does this mean the CIA is coming for me??

 
 Respond to this message   
Ben

You need to get your facts straight.

October 3 2001, 2:47 AM 

For one thing, Israel allows the same freedom of religion that the US does.

Read their history here-
http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/history/israel.html

 
 Respond to this message   
Xia

religiously intolerant?

October 3 2001, 4:32 AM 

Not nearly as intolerant as their neighboring Islamic countries.

People do not get jailed for having short beards and women don't get stoned for having an ankle show in public.

Christians are not jailed.

As far as the history, Israel was once a country before taken over. They only got back what was once theirs.

So, I guess it would be a better analogy to say the american indians kicked our butts in North Carolina and got the state back. Then, Nato intervenes and protects the newly reformed American Indian nation. (Which I think would be cool if they could pull it off in New Mexico!)

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Iran - U.S. "disgusting" and "not competent"
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

DISCLAIMER
Definition:
Skeptic: skeptic in our parlance is someone who examines the subject from all viewpoints with an open mind. Otherwise we do and will call them pseudoskeptics.

Any copyrighted work reproduced on this page is displayed under protection of the Fair Use Doctrine.
If your copyrighted work appears here and you wish it removed, please post a complaint and the work will be removed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "fair use" doctrine allows limited reproduction of copyrighted works for educational and research purposes. The relevant portion of the copyright statue provides that the "fair use" of a copyrighted work, including reproduction "for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research" is not an infringement of copyright. The law lists the following factors as the ones to be evaluated in determining whether a particular use of a copyrighted work is a permitted "fair use," rather than an infringement of the copyright:
• the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
• the nature of the copyrighted work; • the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
• the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Although all of these factors will be considered, the last factor is the most important in determining whether a particular use is "fair." Where a work is available for purchase or license from the copyright owner in the medium or format desired, copying of all or a significant portion of the work in lieu of purchasing or licensing a sufficient number of "authorized" copies would be presumptively unfair. Where only a small portion of a work is to be copied and the work would not be used if purchase or licensing of a sufficient number of authorized copies were required, the intended use is more likely to be found to be fair.