GLEN AVALON
LOG IN SEARCH POST NEW MESSAGE HEADLINES MIMI !! DIVERSIONS MEDITATIONS BIORHYTHMS
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  

Any idea...

October 8 2001 at 7:05 AM
Max 

 
who this is????

http://www.nightwatch2001.com/

Has a lot of links to the watchersnet nightwatch...
and other similarities, but I know it's not me and I don't think it's you.

Any ideas???
Doesn't really matter to me at this point - am just curious who may have been trying to rip us off without our knowing it.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Mike F.

Whois

October 8 2001, 1:58 PM 

Whois says it's these folks-

Registrant:
twogunswebdesigns
witches hollow
colorado springs, co 80911
us

Domain Name: NIGHTWATCH2001.COM

Administrative Contact:
johnson, eric johnny-ringo@email.msn.com
witches hollow
colorado springs, co 80911
us
7193920156

Technical Contact:
administrator, network support@diversehost.net
1935 hollywood blvd
hollywood, florida 33020
US
9549224088

Billing Contact:
johnson, eric johnny-ringo@email.msn.com
witches hollow
colorado springs, co 80911
us
7193920156


Record last updated on 08-Oct-2001.
Record expires on 22-Jan-2002.
Record Created on 22-Jan-2001.

Domain servers in listed order:
NS.DIVERSEHOST.NET 63.126.131.200
NS2.DIVERSEHOST.NET 64.50.123.200

 
 Respond to this message   
Max

none of it rings a bell...

October 8 2001, 2:06 PM 

though after the initial shock of finding it I have calmed down and decided that they weren't doing any harm anyway.

They weren't being disrespectful. They were giving links back to watchersnet in many places, and they were a lot more focused on the UFO topic than I had let us be in over a year.

All in all my initial reaction has completely dissipated. but it sure was a shock to come across it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Xia

Me too

October 9 2001, 1:58 AM 

When I saw this site, my first thought was "Who is this?"

I even wondered if it was another site created by you or my dad, but once I saw their Board, I knew that couldn't be. (Their board was NOTHING in comparison to Max's coding!!!!!!)




 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Any idea...
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

DISCLAIMER
Definition:
Skeptic: skeptic in our parlance is someone who examines the subject from all viewpoints with an open mind. Otherwise we do and will call them pseudoskeptics.

Any copyrighted work reproduced on this page is displayed under protection of the Fair Use Doctrine.
If your copyrighted work appears here and you wish it removed, please post a complaint and the work will be removed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "fair use" doctrine allows limited reproduction of copyrighted works for educational and research purposes. The relevant portion of the copyright statue provides that the "fair use" of a copyrighted work, including reproduction "for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research" is not an infringement of copyright. The law lists the following factors as the ones to be evaluated in determining whether a particular use of a copyrighted work is a permitted "fair use," rather than an infringement of the copyright:
• the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
• the nature of the copyrighted work; • the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
• the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Although all of these factors will be considered, the last factor is the most important in determining whether a particular use is "fair." Where a work is available for purchase or license from the copyright owner in the medium or format desired, copying of all or a significant portion of the work in lieu of purchasing or licensing a sufficient number of "authorized" copies would be presumptively unfair. Where only a small portion of a work is to be copied and the work would not be used if purchase or licensing of a sufficient number of authorized copies were required, the intended use is more likely to be found to be fair.