GLEN AVALON
LOG IN SEARCH POST NEW MESSAGE HEADLINES MIMI !! DIVERSIONS MEDITATIONS BIORHYTHMS
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  

Torturing plants for science

November 25 2001 at 11:33 PM
Webel Fetzer 

 
Scientist can make plants scream

A German physics researcher is making plants scream.

University of Bonn scientist Ralph Gaebler uses a special sensor to register plant gas emissions.

When under stress, plants give off increased amounts of ethylene gas. The sensor translates the gas concentration into noise.

The German newspaper Express reports Mr Gaebler demonstrated the method by cutting a leaf off an orchid, which caused a piercing scream.

He said: "The orchid cannot run away, so this is her way of complaining about such mean treatment."

He caused the same effects by infecting a cucumber with mildew.

Mr Gaebler says his machine frequently registers 'screams' coming from fruit baskets.

"Apples naturally give off lots of ethylene gas. If there are any bananas in the basket, they will quickly turn brown from it," he added.

Story filed: 09:53 Friday 23rd November 2001


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Mike F.

Imagine that!

November 25 2001, 11:39 PM 

Apples just laying there in the bowl, screaming - always screaming...

It gives me chills...

 
 Respond to this message   
Dierdreanna

Re: Imagine that!

November 26 2001, 3:18 PM 

So, he arbitrarily set a machine to change a gas sensor to sound.. Can you make the conclusion that in interspecies communication on such a crude level it means the same thing-that one species reaction in gas is equal to another and that the "scream" corresponds to ours..? Maybe it tickles... Plants grow better and produce better when pruned and trimed. and then assuming that when he said apples always give off ethylene did that mean even on the tree and wouldn't that make them the complainers of the plant world or maybe the gigglers.. Any indication he tried out music types on the plants??

 
 Respond to this message   
Webel Fetzer

Actually... (Scatological observations)

November 26 2001, 6:48 PM 

Actually you are right, as reported in the above article, the experiment was poorly done and the observations were not scientific.

Maybe apples want to be eaten and the ethylene is used to attract things that will eat them. This would result in the apple seeds being deposited in a pile of fertilizer on the ground.

Folks who live in bear country can tell you that a bear can smell ripening apples from miles away. Bears also tend to eat too many apples when they encounter an apple tree. This results in lots of big piles of fertilizer and seeds being deposited within hours. The seeds don't have time to be digested. (But the bears never learn, they're back the next day eating more bushels of apples. Maybe the ethylene is addictive.)

BTW- If you hike in bear country you should attach several little silver bells (the jingle bell type) to your backpack. Bears are dangerous when surprised by a hiker. The bells let them know you are coming and they move out of the way.

MORE about bears:

You can tell what kind of bear is in the woods with you by examining their scat (fertilizer) on the trail.

A black or brown bear will leave a pile of scat about the size of a saucer. It will have seeds or animal bones and hair in it.

Grizzly bears leave a pile of scat about the size of a dinner plate with the same seeds, bones and hair. Often these grizzly bear scat piles will also include little silver bells.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Torturing plants for science
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

DISCLAIMER
Definition:
Skeptic: skeptic in our parlance is someone who examines the subject from all viewpoints with an open mind. Otherwise we do and will call them pseudoskeptics.

Any copyrighted work reproduced on this page is displayed under protection of the Fair Use Doctrine.
If your copyrighted work appears here and you wish it removed, please post a complaint and the work will be removed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "fair use" doctrine allows limited reproduction of copyrighted works for educational and research purposes. The relevant portion of the copyright statue provides that the "fair use" of a copyrighted work, including reproduction "for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research" is not an infringement of copyright. The law lists the following factors as the ones to be evaluated in determining whether a particular use of a copyrighted work is a permitted "fair use," rather than an infringement of the copyright:
• the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
• the nature of the copyrighted work; • the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
• the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Although all of these factors will be considered, the last factor is the most important in determining whether a particular use is "fair." Where a work is available for purchase or license from the copyright owner in the medium or format desired, copying of all or a significant portion of the work in lieu of purchasing or licensing a sufficient number of "authorized" copies would be presumptively unfair. Where only a small portion of a work is to be copied and the work would not be used if purchase or licensing of a sufficient number of authorized copies were required, the intended use is more likely to be found to be fair.