GLEN AVALON
LOG IN SEARCH POST NEW MESSAGE HEADLINES MIMI !! DIVERSIONS MEDITATIONS BIORHYTHMS
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  

Wulfen

November 27 2001 at 8:09 PM
Webel Fetzer 

Stone Age man's terrors still stalk modern nightmares

New research on cave art shows that our fear of werewolves goes back 10,000 years, reports Robin McKie

Sunday November 25, 2001
The Observer

They were created to trigger our most primitive fears - by depicting half-human, half-animal monsters that hunted the living.

But these horrific creatures differed in one crucial way from the warped humanoid beasts that fill the high school corridors of Buffy the Vampire Slayer or the werewolves and blood-sucking monsters that populate horror books. These creatures were painted by Stone Age peoples more than 10,000 years ago and represent some of the world's oldest art.

The surprising discovery that werewolves are as old as humanity is the handiwork of researchers who have carried out a major analysis of the world's ancient rock art sites: in Europe, Africa and Australia.

'We looked at art that goes back to the dawn of humanity and found it had one common feature: animal-human hybrids,' said Dr Christopher Chippindale, of Cambridge University's museum of archaeology and anthropology. 'Werewolves and vampires are as old as art, in other words. These composite beings, from a world between humans and animals, are a common theme from the beginning of painting.'

Chippindale's research - carried out with Paul Tacon of the Australian Museum in Sydney - involved surveys of rock art painted on cliffs in northern Australia, on ledges in South Africa and inside caverns in France and Spain. These are the world's principal prehistoric art sites.

Nor are they made up of crude daubs of paint or charcoal. Many were executed with breathtaking flair.

For example, those at the recently discovered Grotte Chauvet near the Ardèche Gorge in France are more than 30,000 years old, but have stunned critics with their grace and style: horses rearing on their hind legs, rhinoceroses charging.

Most archaeologists have examined these paintings for evidence of the creatures that were hunted at that time. Naturally, these varied according to locality.

But Tacon and Chippindale wanted to find common denominators among these creations, despite the fact that they were painted on different continents.

After careful analysis, they found only one: the 'therianthropes' - human-animal hybrids. Statues of cat-head humans, for example, were found in Europe, while in Australia the team discov ered paintings of feathered humans with birdlike heads and drawings of men with the heads of fruit bats. One of these animal-head beings is depicted attacking a woman, like a poster for early Hollywood horror films.

'Hybrids were the one ubiquitous theme we discovered,' Chippindale said. 'They belong to an imagined world which was powerful, dangerous and - most likely - very frightening.'

These rock art nasties were gazed upon by people in 'altered states of consciousness' - individuals who were either drugged or in trances - the Stone Age equivalent of a six-pack and a video nasty.

This idea is influenced by studies of the modern San people of South Africa who often dance themselves into hypnotic trances. The images they later recall are painted on to cave walls as attempts or entry cards to a spirit world. 'The spirit world is a different and separate place, and you need to learn how to access it,' added Chippindale. Buffy may be adolescent television, in other words, but she taps a deep creative vein.

Many anthropologists believe ancient art works like those at Chauvet were also created for the same reason.

'They are among the most potent images mankind has ever created,' Chippindale said. 'When you enter these caves today, with electric lights and guides, they are still pretty frightening. Armed with only a guttering candle, the experience would have been utterly terrifying in the Stone Age. You would crouch down a corridor and would then be suddenly confronted by a half-man, half-lion, or something similar.'

And once we had unleashed these scary monsters, we never looked back, from the human-animal hybrid gods of the Egyptians - such as Bast, the cat god; or Anubis, the dog god; or creatures such as minotaurs or satyrs. Later came legends such as the werewolf, and finally specific creations such as Bram Stoker's Dracula, an 'undead' human with bat-like features who preyed on the living.

More recently, the most spectacularly successful Hollywood horror films have been those that have focused on creations that have mixed the features of reptiles or insects with those of humans: Alien and Predator being the best examples.

As Chippindale put it, 'these were well-made films, but they also succeeded because they tapped such an ancient urge.'


 

 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Wulfen
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Back To Board  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

DISCLAIMER
Definition:
Skeptic: skeptic in our parlance is someone who examines the subject from all viewpoints with an open mind. Otherwise we do and will call them pseudoskeptics.

Any copyrighted work reproduced on this page is displayed under protection of the Fair Use Doctrine.
If your copyrighted work appears here and you wish it removed, please post a complaint and the work will be removed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "fair use" doctrine allows limited reproduction of copyrighted works for educational and research purposes. The relevant portion of the copyright statue provides that the "fair use" of a copyrighted work, including reproduction "for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research" is not an infringement of copyright. The law lists the following factors as the ones to be evaluated in determining whether a particular use of a copyrighted work is a permitted "fair use," rather than an infringement of the copyright:
• the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
• the nature of the copyrighted work; • the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
• the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Although all of these factors will be considered, the last factor is the most important in determining whether a particular use is "fair." Where a work is available for purchase or license from the copyright owner in the medium or format desired, copying of all or a significant portion of the work in lieu of purchasing or licensing a sufficient number of "authorized" copies would be presumptively unfair. Where only a small portion of a work is to be copied and the work would not be used if purchase or licensing of a sufficient number of authorized copies were required, the intended use is more likely to be found to be fair.