NOTICE: This forum is now archived and in place for reference only.
insurance paying for reversals
by ds (no login)
How can an insurance company pay for a sterilization, but not a reversal. They say a woman has the right to decide she doesn't want more children, maybe because of an unhappy marriage or a number of other things, but then deny her the right to have children when things may be right in her life for that child. The insurance company is only thinking that a sterilization is much cheaper than paying for an OB doctor and the following 18 years of that child or children's life.
Posted on Dec 27, 1998, 10:58 PM from IP address 0.0.0.0
CPTwomen members have testified in front of the IL and CA Court, the IL Gov. Task Force, the Sunset Review Committee, (Senator Liz Figueroa), NOW, and more. What occurred has been made a matter of public record. The CPTwomen are making public the issues which millions of other women have faced in silence. Issues such as women are not informed at the time of their tubal ligation that there is a risk of hormonal imbalance occurring. For the CPTwomen to continue its mission to move this issue to the forefront of government, we must ask for a small contribution/subscription fee from all those who wish to communicate with us and participate at the Coalition's Bulletin Board