Re: I was thinking . . .September 7 2017 at 5:44 PM
No score for this post
Dave (Login SuperDaveIdaho)
Response to I was thinking . . .
I think either would be great options to become Mount Andrus. But I personally lean toward 11,202’ for a couple reasons. First, it is a more impressive mountain when viewed from most angles. Second, it is typically climbed via an east side approach, which I feel is more closely tied to the molybdenum mining issues that Andrus helped thwart back in the 70s. Third, it has a much less accepted unofficial name (Cardiac Peak) that would be more easily overwritten.
Just my two cents.