Return to Index  

Re: I was thinking . . .

September 7 2017 at 5:44 PM
No score for this post

Dave  (Login SuperDaveIdaho)


Response to I was thinking . . .

I think either would be great options to become Mount Andrus. But I personally lean toward 11,202’ for a couple reasons. First, it is a more impressive mountain when viewed from most angles. Second, it is typically climbed via an east side approach, which I feel is more closely tied to the molybdenum mining issues that Andrus helped thwart back in the 70s. Third, it has a much less accepted unofficial name (Cardiac Peak) that would be more easily overwritten.

Just my two cents.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Responses