Welcome to the Penn and Teller bulletin board, a great place to keep in touch with fellow Penn & Teller fans or ask questions about the guys. We welcome your thoughts!
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to P & T Homepage  

Income Tax and The Federal Reserve Were Established Unconstitutionally

September 25 2008 at 12:08 AM
  (Login rudolfo1)

When you have some time, this 1 1/2 hour film shows in detail that the 16th Amendment establishing the income tax in 1913 was found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court decades ago and that the establishment of the Federal Reserve was also unconstitutional. You have to understand that the Federal Reserve is a private bank, not part of the US government, that prints money and lends it to other banks with interest. It changed the course of history in this country and put its government in the hands of bankers. The film also shows that there is NO statute which states an individual must pay personal income tax.

http://video.google.com:80/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
St.Mike
(no login)

Re: Income Tax and The Federal Reserve Were Established Unconstitutionally

September 25 2008, 7:11 PM 

Im sorry, but that is the biggest peice of shit movie since anything Michael Moore has done, You are being lied to by that fucking garbage.


Don't believe what you see in movies.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login rudolfo1)

And...

September 25 2008, 8:07 PM 

You need to rebut things with facts, not opinions. What are those facts that make you say that?

 
 Respond to this message   
Kevin Quail
(Login rudolfo1)

Again, And Yet...

September 25 2008, 11:28 PM 

You present no facts, just an opinion, which, of course, is a ridiculous blanket statement that infers ALL movie documentaries are bullshit, yet I am supposed to just believe you? Why? Prove what you say. I think the film does a pretty good job with facts that support my statement. Here's the foreward to a book about the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins, followed by information about the author:

Foreword

In 1949, while I was visiting Ezra Pound who was a political prisoner at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, Washington, D.C. (a Federal institution for the insane), Dr. Pound asked me if I had ever heard of the Federal Reserve System. I replied that I had not, as of the age of 25. He then showed me a ten dollar bill marked "Federal Reserve Note" and asked me if I would do some research at the Library of Congress on the Federal Reserve System which had issued this bill. Pound was unable to go to the Library himself, as he was being held without trial as a political prisoner by the United States government. After he was denied broadcasting time in the U.S., Dr. Pound broadcast from Italy in an effort to persuade people of the United States not to enter World War II. Franklin D. Roosevelt had personally ordered Pound’s indictment, spurred by the demands of his three personal assistants, Harry Dexter White, Lauchlin Currie, and Alger Hiss, all of whom were subsequently identified as being connected with Communist espionage.

I had no interest in money or banking as a subject, because I was working on a novel. Pound offered to supplement my income by ten dollars a week for a few weeks. My initial research revealed evidence of an international banking group which had secretly planned the writing of the Federal Reserve Act and Congress’ enactment of the plan into law. These findings confirmed what Pound had long suspected. He said, "You must work on it as a detective story." I was fortunate in having my research at the Library of Congress directed by a prominent scholar, George Stimpson, founder of the National Press Club, who was described by The New York Times of September 28, 1952: "Beloved by Washington newspapermen as ‘our walking Library of Congress’, Mr. Stimpson was a highly regarded reference source in the Capitol. Government officials, Congressmen and reporters went to him for information on any subject."

I did research four hours each day at the Library of Congress, and went to St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in the afternoon. Pound and I went over the previous day’s notes. I then had dinner with George Stimpson at Scholl’s Cafeteria while he went over my material, and I then went back to my room to type up the corrected notes. Both Stimpson and Pound made many suggestions in guiding me in a field in which I had no previous experience. When Pound’s resources ran low, I applied to the Guggenheim Foundation, Huntington Hartford Foundation, and other foundations to complete my research on the Federal Reserve. Even though my foundation applications were sponsored by the three leading poets of America, Ezra Pound, E.E. Cummings, and Elizabeth Bishop, all of the foundations refused to sponsor this research. I then wrote up my findings to date, and in 1950 began efforts to market this manuscript in New York. Eighteen publishers turned it down without comment, but the nineteenth, Devin Garrity, president of Devin Adair Publishing Company, gave me some friendly advice in his office. "I like your book, but we can’t print it," he told me. "Neither can anybody else in New York. Why don’t you bring in a prospectus for your novel, and I think we can give you an advance. You may as well forget about getting the Federal Reserve book published. I doubt if it could ever be printed."

This was devastating news, coming after two years of intensive work. I reported back to Pound, and we tried to find a publisher in other parts of the country. After two years of fruitless submissions, the book was published in a small edition in 1952 by two of Pound’s disciples, John Kasper and David Horton, using their private funds, under the title Mullins on the Federal Reserve. In 1954, a second edition, with unauthorized alterations, was published in New Jersey, as The Federal Reserve Conspiracy. In 1955, Guido Roeder brought out a German edition in Oberammergau, Germany. The book was seized and the entire edition of 10,000 copies burned by government agents led by Dr. Otto John.

The burning of the book was upheld April 21, 1961 by judge Israel Katz of the Bavarian Supreme Court. The U.S. Government refused to intervene, because U.S. High Commissioner to Germany, James B. Conant (president of Harvard University 1933 to 1953), had approved the initial book burning order. This is the only book which has been burned in Germany since World War II. In 1968 a pirated edition of this book appeared in California. Both the FBI and the U.S. Postal inspectors refused to act, despite numerous complaints from me during the next decade. In 1980 a new German edition appeared. Because the U.S. Government apparently no longer dictated the internal affairs of Germany, the identical book which had been burned in 1955 now circulates in Germany without interference.

I had collaborated on several books with Mr. H.L. Hunt and he suggested that I should continue my long-delayed research on the Federal Reserve and bring out a more definitive version of this book. I had just signed a contract to write the authorized biography of Ezra Pound, and the Federal Reserve book had to be postponed. Mr. Hunt passed away before I could get back to my research, and once again I faced the problem of financing research for the book.

My original book had traced and named the shadowy figures in the United States who planned the Federal Reserve Act. I now discovered that the men whom I exposed in 1952 as the shadowy figures behind the operation of the Federal Reserve System were themselves shadows, the American fronts for the unknown figures who became known as the "London Connection." I found that notwithstanding our successes in the Wars of Independence of 1812 against England, we remained an economic and financial colony of Great Britain. For the first time, we located the original stockholders of the Federal Reserve Banks and traced their parent companies to the London Connection.

This research is substantiated by citations and documentation from hundreds of newspapers, periodicals and books and charts showing blood, marriage, and business relationships. More than a thousand issues of The New York Times on microfilm have been checked not only for original information, but verification of statements from other sources.

It is a truism of the writing profession that a writer has only one book within him. This seems applicable in my case, because I am now in the fifth decade of continuous writing on a single subject, the inside story of the Federal Reserve System. This book was from its inception commissioned and guided by Ezra Pound. Four of his protégés have previously been awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature, William Butler Yeats for his later poetry, James Joyce for "Ulysses", Ernest Hemingway for "The Sun Also Rises", and T.S. Elliot for "The Waste Land". Pound played a major role in the inspiration and in the editing of these works--which leads us to believe that this present work, also inspired by Pound, represents an ongoing literary tradition.

Although this book in its inception was expected to be a tortuous work on economic and monetary techniques, it soon developed into a story of such universal and dramatic appeal that from the outset, Ezra Pound urged me to write it as a detective story, a genre which was invented by my fellow Virginian, Edgar Allan Poe. I believe that the continuous circulation of this book during the past forty years has not only exonerated Ezra Pound for his much condemned political and monetary statements, but also that it has been, and will continue to be, the ultimate weapon against the powerful conspirators who compelled him to serve thirteen and a half years without trial, as a political prisoner held in an insane asylum a la KGB. His earliest vindication came when the government agents who represented the conspirators refused to allow him to testify in his own defense; the second vindication came in 1958 when these same agents dropped all charges against him, and he walked out of St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, a free man once more. His third and final vindication is this work, which documents every aspect of his exposure of the ruthless international financiers to whom Ezra Pound became but one more victim, doomed to serve years as the Man in the Iron Mask, because he had dared to alert his fellow-Americans to their furtive acts of treason against all people of the United States.

In my lectures throughout this nation, and in my appearances on many radio and television programs, I have sounded the toxin that the Federal Reserve System is not Federal; it has no reserves; and it is not a system at all, but rather, a criminal syndicate. From November, 1910, when the conspirators met on Jekyll Island, Georgia, to the present time, the machinations of the Federal Reserve bankers have been shrouded in secrecy. Today, that secrecy has cost the American people a three trillion dollar debt, with annual interest payments to these bankers amounting to some three hundred billion dollars per year, sums which stagger the imagination, and which in themselves are ultimately unpayable. Officials of the Federal Reserve System routinely issue remonstrances to the public, much as the Hindu fakir pipes an insistent tune to the dazed cobra which sways its head before him, not to resolve the situation, but to prevent it from striking him. Such was the soothing letter written by Donald J. Winn, Assistant to the Board of Governors in response to an inquiry by a Congressman, the Honorable Norman D. Shumway, on March 10, 1983. Mr. Winn states that "The Federal Reserve System was established by an act of Congress in 1913 and is not a ‘private corporation’." On the next page, Mr. Winn continues, "The stock of the Federal Reserve Banks is held entirely by commercial banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System." He offers no explanation as to why the government has never owned a single share of stock in any Federal Reserve Bank, or why the Federal Reserve System is not a "private corporation" when all of its stock is owned by "private corporations".

American history in the twentieth century has recorded the amazing achievements of the Federal Reserve bankers. First, the outbreak of World War I, which was made possible by the funds available from the new central bank of the United States. Second, the Agricultural Depression of 1920. Third, the Black Friday Crash on Wall Street of October, 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. Fourth, World War II. Fifth, the conversion of the assets of the United States and its citizens from real property to paper assets from 1945 to the present, transforming a victorious America and foremost world power in 1945 to the world’s largest debtor nation in 1990. Today, this nation lies in economic ruins, devastated and destitute, in much the same dire straits in which Germany and Japan found themselves in 1945. Will Americans act to rebuild our nation, as Germany and Japan have done when they faced the identical conditions which we now face--or will we continue to be enslaved by the Babylonian debt money system which was set up by the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 to complete our total destruction? This is the only question which we have to answer, and we do not have much time left to answer it.

Because of the depth and the importance of the information which I had developed at the Library of Congress under the tutelage of Ezra Pound, this work became the happy hunting ground for many other would-be historians, who were unable to research this material for themselves. Over the past four decades, I have become accustomed to seeing this material appear in many other books, invariably attributed to other writers, with my name never mentioned. To add insult to injury, not only my material, but even my title has been appropriated, in a massive, if obtuse, work called "Secrets of the Temple--the Federal Reserve". This heavily advertised book received reviews ranging from incredulous to hilarious. Forbes Magazine advised its readers to read their review and save their money, pointing out that "a reader will discover no secrets" and that "This is one of those books whose fanfares far exceed their merit." This was not accidental, as this overblown whitewash of the Federal Reserve bankers was published by the most famous nonbook publisher in the world.

After my initial shock at discovering that the most influential literary personality of the twentieth century, Ezra Pound, was imprisoned in "the Hellhole" in Washington, I immediately wrote for assistance to a Wall Street financier at whose estate I had frequently been a guest. I reminded him that as a patron of the arts, he could not afford to allow Pound to remain in such inhuman captivity. His reply shocked me even more. He wrote back that "your friend can well stay where he is." It was some years before I was able to understand that, for this investment banker and his colleagues, Ezra Pound would always be "the enemy".

EustaceMullins
Jackson Hole, Wyoming
1991

About the Author

Eustace Mullins is a veteran of the United States Air Force, with thirty-eight months of active service during World War II. A native Virginian, he was educated at Washington and Lee University, New York University, Ohio University, the University of North Dakota, the Escuelas des Bellas Artes, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico, and the Institute of Contemporary Arts, Washington, D.C.

The original book, published under the title Mullins On The Federal Reserve, was commissioned by the poet Ezra Pound in 1948. Ezra Pound was a political prisoner for thirteen and a half years at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, Washington, D.C. (a Federal institution for the insane). His release was accomplished largely through the efforts of Mr. Mullins.

The research at the Library of Congress was directed and reviewed daily by George Stimpson, founder of the National Press Club in Washington, whom The New York Times on September 28, 1952 called, "A highly regarded reference source in the capitol. Government officials, Congressmen, and reporters went to him for information on any subject."

Published in 1952 by Kasper and Horton, New York, the original book was the first nationally-circulated revelation of the secret meetings of the international bankers at Jekyll Island, Georgia, 1907-1910, at which place the draft of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was written.

During the intervening years, the author continued to gather new and more startling information about the backgrounds of the people who direct the Federal Reserve policies. New information gathered over the years from hundreds of newspapers, periodicals, and books give corroborating insight into the connections of the international banking houses.*

While researching this material, Eustace Mullins was on the staff of the Library of Congress. Mullins later was a consultant on highway finance for the American Petroleum Institute, consultant on hotel development for Institutions Magazine, and editorial director for the Chicago Motor Club’s four publications.

* The London Acceptance Council is limited to seventeen international banking houses authorized by the Bank of England to handle foreign exchange.

More on this book: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

 
 Respond to this message   
riserock
(no login)

Re: Income Tax and The Federal Reserve Were Established Unconstitutionally

September 26 2008, 7:31 AM 

I saw that documentary a couple years ago and i had some problems with it myself. I can't remember all the things that bothered me. But instead of just making an ignorant, blanket statement that it sucks and don't watch it. I will say, the use of the "mark of the beast" biblical quoting was completely unecessesary as most people are against implanting on it's face --or at least i would hope-- and don't require even one instance of biblical parralleling to know where we are potentially heading. A good grounded thesis is almost always lost when it employs supernatural-tinged elements to help make it's case.

I also think the whole 16th Amendment "Law that never Was" argument is about as murky as the whole Florida presidential election debacle. While there is real smoke around both issues likely proving there was shennanigans in both instances. The average American is just too dumb to sort through all this and already has an overwhelming vested interest in keeping with the income tax. Since they rightfully fear prison if they don't comply.
It does not work to explain the convoluted, voluntary nature of the tax code to most, because they have already resigned to it's deception and are not happy that some are choosing another route, potentially re-affirming their rights, when they're stuck paying their "fair share". It really is a clumsy argument that rarely gets anyone anywhere but in trouble.

Now that i think about it, it seems like the whole first half of that documentary was a bit wonky if i remember right.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login Durakken)

Re: Income Tax and The Federal Reserve Were Established Unconstitutionally

September 26 2008, 12:03 AM 

It has long been debated since the founding of the US. It has been established, taken apart, and then re-established when there was need of it. It doesn't really matter though as US currency is kinda a joke as it is backed by faith ^.^

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login cinndave)

Re: Income Tax and The Federal Reserve Were Established Unconstitutionally

September 30 2008, 8:55 PM 

How can the 16th Amendment be unconstitutional when the 16th Amendment IS the constitution?

Served.

 
 Respond to this message   
Kevin Quail
(Login rudolfo1)

16th Amendment

October 1 2008, 1:04 PM 

There are plenty of places to find information about whether or not the 16th Amendment was actually legally ratified by the requisite number of states. According to the US government it was, but why would anyone trust them, just based on the all the administrations since Nixon? If there's one organization I don't trust, it's the US government.

 
 Respond to this message   
Kevin Quail
(Login rudolfo1)

Check Some Sources

October 3 2008, 3:51 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: Check Some Sources

October 4 2008, 2:18 PM 

Well the Government also tells us that Timmothy McVeigh bombed that Federeal building on April 19th 1995, but why should we trust them right? I mean they also told us that Al Quaeda bombed the WTC in 1993, the embassies in Africa in 1998, and The USS Cole in 2000. Now we know who was really behind 9/11 right? Why trust the feds? I think that there was a Penn and Teller BS! episode about this. Promoting info like this makes me wonder why so many kooks are attracted to Skeptic websites where you get laughed at for saying something so silly and flimsy as: "The feds say that it was, but why should we trust them."

 
 Respond to this message   
riserock
(no login)

Re: Check Some Sources

October 6 2008, 6:07 AM 

Ben, if a man with a P.H.D. tells you that we evolved from monkeys but goes on to say the earth is flat, would he be right or only partly right? Because your logic there has more holes in it then Tiger Wood's backyard.

I mean try these examples:

Fortune magazine called Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" six years in a row. --- Are we not to question Enron now?

The American Legacy Foundation who is responsible for Truth.com commercials is a non-profit organization. --- Does this mean we shouldn't question their relationship with their founder's (Big Tobacco)?

Infamous Ponzi Scheme designers Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (who oversees the monies for the James Randi Educational Foundation's "Million Dollar Challenge") were recently caught bribing members of congress to pass Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Bailout Bill) -- Does this mean we should take a closer look at the JREF Challenge? -- Actually, this couldn't hurt one bit.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Re: Check Some Sources

October 9 2008, 6:20 PM 

Yes, that statement was murkey. What I want to say is that focusing on a small problem like the 16th Ammendment conspiracy and the IRS erodes a lot of effort that could go into promoting Neal Boortz' Fair Tax or any other libertarian minded cause. This argument is as stupid as saying that Native Americans and Mexicans got their land stolen from them. Most tribes' religion was set so far back that capitalism hadn't yet entered into their minds when the Europeans caim and concored what is now known as the Americas. All to often, native tribes were offered what they conceived as a large value for plots of land like Manhattan. Why did they agree to such a small price? Because their religion was environmentaly centered. They thought that the god of nature prevented land ownership. The concept was so silly to them that they gave it away for something cool, because in their view they weren't losing anything because nobody could really ownly own land. This is the same reason that Christianity was able to tax its followers, because god owned everything. What we really should be focusing on is promoting sensible and rational libertarianism (like Penn and Teller promote). We need to avoid associating with fundamentally kooky ideas. For some reason, the Libertarian Party attracts a lot of kooky people and Reason Magazine has always made it a point to promote the politically stupid things that the party does to keep its base.

With the current economic crisis, people are still under the assumption that a free market would not work, because of what they are seeing going on with our mixed market. Because of political populism, Centrism ends up being the defacto political stance of most politicians. Capitalism works where and when it is attempted.

One could say that the United States has never truely practiced real capitalism, but you hear the same argument with the other side when they discus their economic policy as being superior.

The Democratic Party has made it their goal to destroy economic liberty, the Republicans have made it their goal only to do it a little bit slower and with more pandering to the religous idiots. And the Libertarians and the third parties? They have made it their goal to attract as many kooks as possible such as those who want to tell you what kind of car you should be allowed to drive and why you should be able to purchace unpasturized milk.


 
 Respond to this message   
Kevin Quail
(Login rudolfo1)

Yikes!!

October 25 2008, 3:21 AM 

First of all, before addressing the logic, let's just spellcheck, because that generally gives me an idea of the intelligence of the person I'm dealing with. And I'm really drunk right now.

1. The word is murky, not "murkey".

2. "caim and concored" should be came and conquered. I mean, these can't be typing errors because the "i" is nowhere near the "m" and concored is just stupid, only close in spelling to where an early battle in the Revolutionary War was fought. (Hey, Ben, can you guess which city I mean?)

3. "All to often" should be, of course, "All too often".

4. it's environmentally, not "environmentaly"

5. "ownly own land?" Not even sure what the fuck you mean. Are you trying to spell "only own land?" Still makes no sense.

6. truly, not "truely"

7. It's discuss, not "discus". The Olympics is over.

8. Geez, come on, it's Louis Pasteur, not Pastur so it's "UNPASTEURIZED"

As far as relating the ratification of the 16th Amendment to what American Indians thought about land ownership or who Christianity could tax- you are mixing apples and oranges, shoehorns and buttplugs, pizza and ground rhino horn. In other words, what the fuck are you talking about?

And "Capitalism works where and when it is attempted", we see from the current market moves and the socialistic nationalization of the banks how well that unregulated system of free markets works- capitalize the gains, socialize the losses seems to be more the order of the day.





 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Income Tax and The Federal Reserve Were Established Unconstitutionally
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to P & T Homepage