odd to go back to seedings for semis

by notahawk (Login notahawk)


my thought is still why award the #4 seed (not #2)the opportunity to have to play against #7, #10, #13 without an elimination threat and get a bye to the semis.

I would have to think the top 2 teams as rated by all should receive the best treatment.

By placing #1 and #2 in Pool A, you could eliminate the good chance of #1 and #4 playing twice against each other (prior to the final).

For example, #1 runs the table and #2 wins their other three games in pool play.
Then #1 would play the winner of 2nd Quarter Final and #2 would play winner of 1st quarter final.

By setting the tournament schedule up cleaner, there wouldn't be a need to go back to pre-tournament seedings.....hence if an upset does occur in the quarter, the schedule doesn't magically change for the better for the highest ranked team and doesn't hammer down on a cinderella. More of a bracket format could follow all pool play.

Just some thoughts as we wait for the week-end.

Anyone know if there will be overtime in pool games??????

Posted on Aug 19, 2009, 9:02 PM
from IP address

Respond to this message

Return to Index

  1. Not sure If I'd call it awarding.... Derek Blasutti, Aug 19, 2009, 11:11 PM

Find more forums on LacrosseCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2018 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement