Open predictions February 20 2008 at 12:29 PMNo score for this post
Anonymous
(Login sattisucks3 ) from IP address 67.189.254.19 103
1. Labeef-woodstock
2. Fontaine- Southington
3. Ekpenyong- Middletown
4. Wood- St. Bernard
5. Lonergan- Law
6. Tenan- BE
112
1. Smutnick- Woodstock
2. Briskin- Chesire
3. johnson-platt
4. Porzillo- Pomperaug
5. Amorando- New Milford
6. Damici- Danbury
119
1. Walsh- Farmington
2. Costanzo- Danbury
3. Ferrante- Shelton
4. Thoutte- Killingly
5. Ricco- Stratford
6. Zachary- Somers
125
1. Marouski- Windham
2. Blank- Ridgefield
3. Odell- South Windsor
4. Madkour-Danbury
5. Vallario- Glastonbury
6. Watkins- Warde
130
1. Banks- Griswold
2. Abbate- Xavier
3. Bailey- Farmongton
4. Frick- New Fairfield
5. Cardona- Maloney
6. Blain- Windham
135
1. Coutu- Griswold
2. Inman- Stratford
3. Gallicano- Law
4. Onofrio- Hand
5. Krohley- Amity
6. Darley-BC
140
1. Schaefer- Danbury
2. Satti-Ledyard
3. Butcher- Morgan
4. Calrke- East Lyme
5. Peek- Killingly
6. Krolikowski-BE
145
1. Magnoli- Rocky Hill
2. Fish- Hand
3. Fiore- Joel Barlow
4. Pierre Saint- Stamford
5. Donovan- Ludlowe
6. Sullivan- Ledyard
152
1. Ford- Bethel
2. Bellagamba- New Milford
3. Smith- Danbury
4. Tiger- Ridgefield
5. Brown- Middletown
6. Roebelen- Windsor
160
1. Ritchie- Southongton
2. Acca- Plainville
3. Thompson- Westhill
4. Fiorillo- Berlin
5. Fleming- Windham
6. Ceci- Greenich
171
1. Griswold- New Milford
2. Vollaro- Somers
3. Burgess- Bacon
4. Thiel- Middletown
5. Lovetere- Gilbert
6. Brody- Farmington
189
1. Cronan- Terryville
2. Hightower-Ledyard
3. Milano- New Canaan
4. Arnold- Simsbury
5. Gillen- Shelton
6. Mckeever- Brookfield
215
1. Perry- Middletown
2. Furze-White- Simsbury
3. Lazurek- Derby
4. LaDuca- Danbury
5. Bowman- East Lyme
6. Koch- Windham
285
1. Chambers- BC
2. Stanley- Weaver
3. Belanger- Middletown
4. Swift- Danbury
5. Gabordi- Ledyard
6. Wigglesworth- Shelton
Author Reply grecothrow (Login grecothrow ) 76.202.83.68 wowww No score for this post February 20 2008, 1:24 PM
these are the worst predictions i have ever seen, how much more retarded can you get kid? you obviously hate satti "hints to your name" and have no idea, hahah hightower 2nd? perry 1st? hahah wow kid maybe you should figure out wrestling and placing talent before you waste time to write somwthing this hahah
Anonymous (Login perry103 ) 149.152.132.8 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 20 2008, 1:41 PM
These predictions are not even possible, because you do not take into account the bracketing. For example, at 112, Brisken and Smutnick are on the same side of the bracket; it is impossible for them to place 1-2.
Anonymous (Login sattisucks3 ) 67.189.254.19 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 2:23 PM
these are still relitively accurate results...
and i do hate satti...he cheated his way past lombardi last year in the open when he shouldve been called for stalling
Anonymous (Login sattisucks3 ) 67.189.254.19 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 2:23 PM
these are still relitively accurate results...
and i do hate satti...he cheated his way past lombardi last year in the open when he shouldve been called for stalling
Anonymous
(Login ctwrestler21 ) 24.44.142.238 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 3:14 PM
how are these accurate? at 119 walsh is not going to win, it will be either ricco or costanzo then ferante then ricco or costanzo than walsh
Anonymous
(Login ctwrestler21 ) 24.44.142.238 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 3:17 PM
mand hightowre willdefinetly win 189
Anonymous (Login satti103 ) 76.239.47.70 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 4:04 PM
i suck? and i cheated? lmfao. find me at opens and introduce yourself id love to meet you. =]
Anonymous (Login jfwrstl ) 71.234.4.130 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 4:15 PM
yeah, id love to meet you too :P
deleted
(Login woww123 ) 70.188.135.141 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 4:20 PM
if the ref didnt call it he wasnt stalling.
Anonymous (Login 5pointz ) 68.229.72.86 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 22 2008, 4:22 PM
and you dont even have vernik placing at 40? cmonnnnn bro
Anonymous (Login jmast4 ) 69.119.75.74 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 23 2008, 1:19 PM
how did you come up with these rankings? they are so bad. First of all at 130 Battinelli is not even in your top people and he should atleast com in third
Anonymous (Login sattisucks3 ) 67.189.254.19 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 23 2008, 2:33 PM
satti u know that u were stalling and you now that lombardi is clearly the better wrestler
Anonymous (Login thecontender ) 66.212.218.95 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 23 2008, 2:38 PM
Clearly, Lombardi didn't show it.
Anonymous
(Login sattisucks3 ) 67.189.254.19 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 23 2008, 2:48 PM
he couldnt with satti stalling for the whole ;ast half of the match
Anonymous (Login 103madness ) 71.234.3.4 Re: Open predictions No score for this post February 23 2008, 5:03 PM
Berlin 160 should be alot higher
Current Topic - Open predictions