Top 25 teams at the 09 Open based on potential returning wrestlers (mathematical scoring system used). Schools with strong youth programs will do better due to experienced freshmen wrestlers not scored in this system.
1 Danbury
2 Bacon
3 Warde
4 Berlin
5 Platt-M
6 Somers
7 Hand
8 Woodstock
9 S Windsor
10 Conard
11 Pomperaug
12 Amity
13 Hall-WH
14 Xavier
15 Bristol C
15 Waterford
17 Shelton
18 Gilbert
19 Guilford
20 Bethel
20 E Lyme
22 Housatonic
23 Simsbury
24 Ledyard
25 E Haven
25 Immaculate
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
how can you not have windham, middeltown, new milford, waterford, derby in that list? theres no way somers, south windsor, guilbert, guilford, east haven, will be beter than those teams
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
i honestly dont agree with these at all maybee the top ten but from there on is kinda idk wrong? yea i no 3periods goes by like a system but after u should throw in ur opinion and such
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
first conard is not going to be better then hall, hall was pretty good this year, they return most so they will be doin better then them. shelton will be doin better then that i think, also, simsbury is (if im correct) will be returning many so they wont fair too bad. i agree with south windsor and somers returning a good number making them good.
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
If you all remember this thread was about placement at the 09
State Opens. So it's not only about having a solid team or being
better than a team in a head to head meet. You have to have kids
that can finish in the top 4 at the Class regionals or you don't
get representation at the Opens. The teams 3 Periods has placing
at Opens takes into account only the wrestlers that are ranked in
the top 4 at their respective Classes.
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
I know Bristol Central had a weaker schedule, but 15th: 23-0 this year, stacked with under classmen and only graduated 2 or 3 (and those weren't even the tougher kids)
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
No montville either? I beleive the Ville will be doing very good next year even with loosing 7 seniors. They have a few underclassmen stepping up and a good ammount of experienced freshman that will be arriving. But hey, i guess we wont know until after this years thanksgiving now will we?
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
alright im pretty sure bristol beat an injured southington(also had kids out due to grades, nobody saw badgley and barely saw uliaz this year) so y arent they up there...other teams should b up there too
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.