>It's a plain old text based email list but has higher traffic than the PI forum.
I receive the statistics for Pantera International's forum every month, they are very very good, they continue to get better. Nobody has access to information that would support the "higher traffic" claim but me, and I strongly disagree. I will agree the drama & ego of the mail list is greater though. Which is why I stopped participating in the mail list more than a half decade ago. But drama & conflict gives the impression of more activity. The Pantera International Forum, like this forum, expects members to be respectful of one another.
>You can make similar power with a stock displacement 351C but you will have to spin
>the engine to a much higher RPM and low speed performance and idle quality will suffer.
>The power band will also be narrower and the throttle response under 3000 RPM will be sluggish.
Dan has run a couple of cam profiles I threw together on his dynomation software ... low overlap profiles ... that made 470 to 500 BHP at 6000 rpm or less with a standard displacement 351C. Not high rpm, not bad idle quality, not poor low speed performance. If hitting that 500 BHP number is important, it can be done with a 351 at 6000 rpm.
-G
____________________________________________________________
Pantera Photos |
351C Historic Information |
351C Technical Information
If you use a 351C 4V powered vehicle for a grocery getter ... the eggs aren't going to make it home!
