<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Which Harmonic Balancer

February 2 2012 at 11:13 AM
  (Login 74ford)
Member
from IP address 198.178.190.1


I'm working on putting the 400 together and I have 2 different balancers I can use. one is a wide, full round balancer and the other is thinner.

[linked image]

[linked image]

Any reason to use one over the other performance-wise?


Thanks
Howard

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Premier Login blizzardND)
Forum Owner
69.178.219.74

Which ever one that isn't 30-40 years old..

February 2 2012, 11:30 AM 

the rubber gets old and cracks.. then bad things happen.

Otherwise I would say the wider heavier of the two.

More mass to "Dampen" the shock loading of those pistons going up and down.

Happy New Year 2012!!..

 
 Respond to this message   

tinman
(Login tinman351)
Moderators
69.246.218.44

Re: Which ever one that isn't 30-40 years old..

February 2 2012, 1:10 PM 

i'd sure go with the heavier one, the 302 outter ring has to be way to light for a 400...

unless you'd rather trade bearing life for less rotational mass and maybe slightly faster spool-up

are the timing scales in the same place?




there'll be phantoms, there'll be fires on the road... and the white man dancing


    
This message has been edited by tinman351 from IP address 69.246.218.44 on Feb 2, 2012 2:01 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login big.al)
Member
71.99.90.144

sweet deal

February 2 2012, 2:05 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login 74ford)
Member
198.178.190.1

Both balancers

February 2 2012, 4:35 PM 


Came off of 351Ms so I think I will go with the bigger one.

Thanks
Howard

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Which Harmonic Balancer
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index