About the forum / Forum Hakkında

Main Page / Ana sayfa

Bibliography / Kaynakça

For questions send mail to yalpacik@hotmail.com



Respond to this message
Original Message
  • actually you are right Filiz
    • timucin (no login)
      Posted Jun 15, 2001 10:20 AM

      Although I do not like the idea of an original language as in original Turkish,come to think of it, Gokturk was more original. For example, for us lance is 'mizrak', which is not Turkish by definition; it starts with 'm'. We also have 'sungu', which is Turkish. Whereas we cannot figure out where this 'sungu' comes, for Gokturk speakers, speakers of old Turkish or Turkic, it was easy, since 'sunu' meant lance. Another example would be 'oksuz'(without mother and/or father). We cannot see the relationship between 'ana' (mother) and oksuz. But, for old Turkish speakers it was obvious, since og meant mother.

      So, you have a point.
    Login Status
  • You are not logged in
    • Login
      Password
       

      Optional
      Provides additional benefits such as notifications, signatures, and user authentication.


      Create Account
    Your Name
    Your Email
    (Optional)
    Message Title
    Message Text
    Options Also send responses to my email address
          


    Find more forums on HistoryCreate your own forum at Network54
     Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement