<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>  

Fleur's actress is UGLY

July 12 2004 at 4:39 PM
No score for this post
  (Login cheer4west)

 
Mr friend showed my pics of the french actress who's playing her and I think she's not that pretty. and fleur's supose to be really pretty.kate winslet should have played her they should of kept her in the role because all she'd have to do is dye her hair. i hope the guy playing cedric isn't ugly.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(Login MiriamG)

Re: Fleur's actress is UGLY

No score for this post
July 13 2004, 2:10 PM 

Ok, for one thing; I've seen pictures of the actress and she's not ugly. She is not Fleurishly gorgeus but she is certainly not ugly.

Second; KATE WINSLET?! Are you kidding?! She's like in her 30s and Fleur is supposed to be 17!

-------------------------------------------------------------

Miriam G.

http://www.livejournal.com/users/miriamg/

by MagicalObizuth

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
harry_fan
(Login harry_fan)

Re: Fleur's actress is UGLY

No score for this post
July 14 2004, 8:20 AM 

Kate Winslet!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Are you kidding me, she's like 40!

Second, Fleur's actress isn't ugly, she doesn't have the veela thing but she isn't ugly.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Fleur's actress is UGLY
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement