"interrupts have crummy timing anyway (a horizontal scan takes tens of microseconds, you might wait that long just to get the interrupt handler, especially if more priviledged I/O is going on)" What are you talking about? Interrupts have great timing. BANG and your handler is running. Even if more privileged I/O is going on, *a polling routine isn't going to be running anyway*. An interrupt handler has the advantage of being able to wait even after the trigger has gone away. ...buuuut as far as I know there is no way for the horizontal retrace to trigger an interrupt. from IP address 220.245.178.132 |
| Response Title | Author and Date |
| Reference (URL) | on Jul 22 |
| And? | on Jul 22 |
| * In particular was the latency part, tens of microseconds. | on Jul 22 |
| And you expect interpreted BASIC to compete with that? | on Jul 22 |
| Re: And you expect interpreted BASIC to compete with that? | on Jul 23 |
| No, I don't | on Jul 23 |