Prior to and during world war 2

by Lisa Williams (no login)

 
Maybe it should be Melbounre University studying world history rather than American History.

I like my brother but my brother has a personal trainer, maybe Einstein is the figure here.

I think it is about time, that the world has a look at history. What I know is that to give credit, france is an exceptional country when it comes to the quality of goods produced, I would question their nuclear energy.

I would like to say that it was Germany who first Patented ammonium, which has make farming far more productive than our nations could imagine. As the history books read, they built their industries very closely around science as did England. Hense the collection of Cooks and crews goods.

It was the hard work of Germany and Hitlers theories were born from the royal society of both England and Germany, but where for England discreditted, some science, Germany took it on. It is without Question disgusting, there were indeed better ways of solving problems that those used. It was hideous but I will remind America that they were very much pinching science off Garmany during world war 1 and prior, as I believe America of all people had problems with the patent and trade agreement of Amonium , paint etc.

Please I wish people to read.

Mr Howard does not have a duty to America, he has a duty to Australia and to world nations, and if Australia needs to restructure with a bit of hard work rather than to sell things off and make the budget look good then I think maybe Mr Howard needs to do the hard work.

I may not have been inparliament for many years, but I have certainly listend and supported policy which I've agreed with.

Supperannuation was a big one and the GST, excluding tampons. I believe over many years I have listened to major policy, and all I see is many ideas being taken off.

Yes I do agree with public transport being free for students, until they can buy a car that works. I have thought this for a longtime, ever since I vistied sydney and their's were free. I really believe that is a policy both parties can take up. I do believe it puts the youth in a strong position to be able to save, and buy some of the things that do cost that weren't around when we were younger like mobile phones, which are safety.

My message to the Royal family is clear, I believe recent actions, have disabbled your power to be the figure that is written into our constitution. You are in affect meaningless and rather a group of people who parade around and do not interject were required and needed. You do not uphold equality which is what our nations are about given the history. The history which was forged by the execution of Henry's wives which lead to greater equality. Of Queens, Anne, Mary, Victoria, Elizabeth. Our history is one to uphold and the Queen has failed to do this, which brings questions to the relevance of who she is. I believe there are better Queens than others and this is a problem.



Posted on Oct 23, 2006, 10:00 PM
from IP address 203.32.65.101


Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Find more forums on World HistoryCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement