º«¹úѧÈË·¢±íÂÛÎÄ£¬Ëµºº×ÖÊǺ«¹úÈË·¢Ã÷
º«¹úѧÕß·¢±íµÄÂÛÎÄ£¬ËµÃ÷Á˺º×ÖÊǹŴúº«¹úÈË·¢Ã÷²¢´«²¥µ½ÖÐÔ¡£
¡¡¡¡¼òµ¥µÄ·Òëһϣº¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡ÎÒ¼á³ÖÈÏΪ£¬ËùνµÄ¡°ºº×Ö¡±£¬¿ÉÄÜÊÇÓɸßÀöÈË׿ÏÈ·¢Ã÷·¢Õ¹µÄ£¬ÖÁÉÙ£¬Ò²ÓпÉÄÜÊÇÆäËû°¢¶ûÌ©ÓïϵµÄ·Ç»ªÈËÄÁÃñ×å´´ÔìµÄ£¬ËäÈ»ÈË¿ÚÖÚ¶àµÄÖйúÈËҲʹÓúº×Ö×÷Ϊ×Ô¼ºµÄÊéдϵͳ¡£ÎÒÏàÐÅ£ºÈκÎ×å¶¼²»ÄÜÀûÓÃÈË¿ÚÊýÁ¿À´Ä£ºý±¾Ô´£¬ÎÒ½«³ÂÊöһЩ֤¡£
¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡I insist that the so-called Chinese character (Hanja in Korean) was probably invented and developed by Korean ancestors or£¬ at least£¬ other non-Chinese nomadic people who spoke in Altaic or related languages£¬ although the populous Chinese also have used it as their basic writing systems. I believe the number of population of any ethnic group should not be a factor that obscures the origin. I explain some evidences.
¡¡¡¡I insist that the so-called Chinese character (Hanja in Korean) was probably invented and developed by Korean ancestors or£¬ at least£¬ other non-Chinese nomadic people who spoke in Altaic or related languages£¬ although the populous Chinese also have used it as their basic writing systems. I believe the number of population of any ethnic group should not be a factor that obscures the origin. I explain some evidences.
¡¡¡¡
һλº«¹ú¾«Ó¢peterkim£¨»áÓ¢Óïд×÷£©ÔÚÒ»¸öÓ¢ÎÄÕ¾¹Ø¡°º«¹úÈË·¢Ã÷ºº×Ö¡±ÌÖÂÛµÄÁôÑÔ£º
¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡peterkim£ºÖйúÀúÊ·±»ÆÕ±éµØÅ¤Çú£¬ÕâÊÇÖÚËùÖÜÖªµÄ¡£Äã¿´¿´Î§Æå±ÈÈü£¬º«¹ú¿ÉÒÔÇáÒ׵ػ÷°ÜÖйú¡£Èç¹ûΧÆåÕæµÄÊÇÖйú·¢Ã÷µÄ£¬ÄÇÖйúΪʲ»áÏÂÄDzÎÒÃÇÔÙ¿´¿´ÓýÔ˶¯£¬¿´¿´ÊÀ½ç±£¨¿ÉÄÜÖ¸×ãÇò°É£©£¬Öйúÿ´ÎºÍº«¹ú±ÈÈü¶¼»á±»´ò°ÜµÃºÜÄÑ¿´£¡ÔÚÏÖ´ú»¯¼¼Êõ·½Ã棬º«¹úµÄÈýÐÇ£¬ÏÖ´ú£¬LG£¬ÆðÑÇÖÆÔìµÄ²úÆ·È«ÇòÁ÷ÐУ¬µ«ÊÇÖйúµÄ²úÆ·ÔÚÄÄÄØ£¿Ò»¸ö13ÒÚÈ˵ÄÃñ×åÈ´²»ÄÜ´ò°ÜÒ»¸ö8ǧÈ˵ÄСÃñ×壬º«¹úÈËÈÔÈ»ÔÚºõËùÓеÄÁìÓò×öµÃ±ÈÖйúÈËºÃºÜ¶à¡£ÕæÀí²»ÊÇÔÚÕ⣨ָÌÖÂÛ¡°º«¹úÈË·¢Ã÷ºº×Ö¡±µÄÂÛ̳£©£¬¶øÊÇÔÚÄãÃÇÖйúÈËÊÇ·ñ½ÓÊÜÕâ¸öÕæÀí£¨¡°º«¹úÈË·¢Ã÷ºº×Ö¡±£©¡£ºÜ¶àÔÚÖйúµÄÖйúÀúʷѧ¼Ò¶¼ÈÏΪ¶«ÒÄÈËÊǺ«¹úÈË£¬ÊÇDa'wek kou ÎÄ»¯£¨²»¶®£©µÄ´´ÔìÕß¡£Õâ¼ÇÔØË¾ÂíǨµÄÊ·¼ÇÖС£
¸ö˵Ã÷£º
Da'wek kou ÎÄ»¯Ö¸µÄÊÇ´óãë¿ÚÎÄ»¯
µØµãÊÇÔÚ½ñɽ¶«Ê¡Ì©É½µØÇø¡£
ÕûƪÎÄÕ²»ÖµÒ»²µ£¬ËäÈ»º«¹úÈËYYÖ®³Ì¶ÈÈùúÈËÄ¿µÉ¿Ú´ô£¬²»¹ýÕâ¶«Î÷Ҳʵ¸ãЦµ½µã£¬´óãë¿ÚÎÄ»¯µÄÔ¾ÓÃñ±»³ÆÎª¶«ÒÄÈË£¬¿ÉϧËûÃǾÓסµØÔÚÏÖÔÚµÄɽ¶«Ê¡£¬Õâ˵À´£¬º«¹úÈ˵ÄÀÏ׿×Ú»¹ÊÇÖйúÈËÄØ£º£©
ÎÄÖо¹È»ÒÔ¾º¼¼³É°Ü·´ÍÆÆðÔ´£¬Èç´ËÒ»À´£¬×ãÇò¿Ï¶¨²»ÊÇÓ¢¹úÈË·¢Ã÷µÄ£¬ËûÃDZ»°ÍÎ÷ÈË¡¢°¢¸ùÍ¢ÈË´òµÄÏñûÓÐÒ»Ñù°¡~ËùνµÄÓ¢ÓӦ¸ÃÊÇÃÀ¹úÈË´´ÔìµÄ£¬ÖйúÈË£¿ËûÃÇ¿ÉÄÜ·¢Ã÷ÁËÆ¹ÅÒÇòºÍÓðëÇò£¬Ó¡¶ÈÈ˺Ͱͻù˹̹ÈË·¢Ã÷Á˰åÇòµ±È»£¬ÕâЩ½áÂÛ¶¼ÊÇ¡°Ê±¾ã½ø¡±µÄ£¬100Äê¿ÉÄÜ»áÓб仯£¬ÇëË¡ÎÒ²»ÄÜËæÊ±¸üÐÂÁË¡¡
The so-called Chinese character was probably invented and
developed by Korean, although the populous Chinese also have used it as
their basic writing systems. I believe the number of population of any
ethnic group should not be a factor that obscures the origin. I explain some
evidences.
±»³ÆÎª¡°ºº×Ö¡±µÄÎÄ×ÖÓпÉÄÜÊǸßÀöÈË·¢Ã÷µÄ£¬¾¡¹ÜÓµÓÐÅÓ´óÈ˿ڵĺºÃñ×彫ÆäÓÃ×÷»ù´¡Êéдϵͳ£¬µ«ÊÇÎÒÏàÐÅÈË¿ÚÊýÁ¿²»Ó¦¸Ã³ÉΪ»ìÏýÊÂÎï±¾À´ÂúÄ¿µÄÒòËØ¡£ÏÂÃæÎÒ½«²ûÊö¸öÀýÖ¤¡£
1. The original pictographs called 'gab-gol' (bone and shell) or 'bok-sa' in
Korean were certainly invented during the Yin dynasty (or Shang state, BC
1600~BC 1046), although it is uncertain who was the inventor. There is no
dispute regarding this matter between Korean and Chinese historians. There
are ample recent evidences that the dominant people of the Yin dynasty was
Korean, which some Chinese historians also acknowledge.
1¡¢±»³ÆÎª¡°¼×¹Ç¡±£¨¹ÇºÍ¼×¿Ç£©»òÔÚº«ÓïÖб»³ÆÎª'bok-sa'µÄÔʼÏóÐÎÎÄ×Ö£¬¿ÉÒԿ϶¨·¢Ã÷Ò󳯣¨»òÉ̹ú£¬1600 BC ~ 1046 BC£©£¬ËäÈ»²»Äܿ϶¨ÊÇË·¢Ã÷µÄ¡£ÔÚÕâÒ»µãÉÏÖк«Á½¹úÀúʷѧ¼Ò¼æÃ»ÓÐÕùÒé¡£×î½ü£¬ÓÐÁ¦µÄÖ¤Ö¤Ã÷£¬Ò󳯵ÄͳÖÎÕßÊǸßÀöÈË£¬²¿·ÖÖйúÀúʷѧ¼ÒÒ²ÖªµÀÕâÒ»µã¡£
2. Among countries that adopted Chinese character, only Koreans use exactly
one syllable for one character. Chinese or Japanese used one or more
syllables for one character. A good example is the sounds denoting the
numbers. Only Koreans use just one syllable for one number. So, it is very
easy for Koreans to say any complex numbers quickly.
For another example, the sound for 'white' in Chinese character in 'baek'
(one syllable) in Korean but 'bai' (two syllable) in Chinese. Regarding the
character denoting 'head', it is 'doo' in Korean but 'tou' in Chinese. On
the other hand, it is the same for the character denoting 'mountain' -
'shan' in both Korean and Chinese.
Why have Koreans used only one syllable for one character, but Chinese one
or more syllables? It certainly shows that Chinese pronunciation system is a
variant from Korean counterpart.
3. Some basic pictographs reflect Korean life-style and customs.
3¡¢Ò»Ð©»ù´¡ÏóÐÎÎÄ×Ö·´Ó³Á˸ßÀöÈ˵ÄÉú»î·½Ê½ºÍ·çËס£
For example, the character denoting 'house' (ga in Korean) contains a
character denoting a pig (hog) in the lower part. In the house, people live,
not a pig live. Why did they adopt a pig to denote a house? Only Koreans
raised pigs within their house.
ÀýÈ磬±íʾ¡°¼Ò¡±µÄºº×Ö£¨º«Óï·¢Òôga£©µÄϰ벿·Ö°üº¬Á˱íʾ¡°Öí¡±µÄºº×Ö¡£ÎªÊ²ËûÃǽÓÊÜһͷÖíÀ´±íʾ¡°¼Ò¡±£¿Ö»ÓиßÀöÈ˰ÑÖíÑøÔÚÎÝ×Ó¡£
Another example is the character denoting 'sun'. The character contains a
dot within a rectangle. Why did they contain the dot, seemingly
unnecessarily? The dot denotes a golden crow. Only Koreans had the legend
linking the sun to the golden crow.
ÁíÒ»¸öÀý×ÓÊDZíʾ̫ÑôµÄºº×Ö¡°ÈÕ¡±¡£Õâ¸ö×Ö°üÀ¨Ò»¸ö¾ØÐκÍÃæµÄÒ»¸öµã¡£ÎªÊ²ËûÃÇÒª¼ÓÉÏÕâ¸öµã£¿¿´ÆðÀ´ÍêȫûÓбØÒª¡£Õâ¸öµã´ú±í×ÅÒ»Ö»½ðÎÚÑ»¡£Ö»ÓиßÀöÈËÖÐÁ÷´«¹ý°ÑÌ«ÑôºÍ½ðÎÚÑ»ÁªÏµÆðÀ´µÄ´«Ëµ¡£
Additional example is the character denoting 'surname' (ssi in Korean). In
Chinese, the character denotes only 'surname' while it denotes both
'surname' and 'seed' in Korean. 'Ssi' is a most common word in Korean and
compares the pedigree with the tree (i.e., the seed is a common symbol for
the original ancestor whose trace has been handed down by his surname).
4. Korean history book describes the origin of written systems, which is
inscribed in dolmens in Korea.
A Korean history book called Chun-bu-gyung records the origin of both
current Chinese character and Korean alphabet (hangul). Chinese character is
a kind of pictograph + ideograph, while hangul is the most advanced of
phonogram + ideogram in the world. Bone and shell inxxxxions were a
pictograph, while hexagrams of I-ching invented by Fu Xi (Bokhwi in Korean)
are a kind of ideogram. The original character for both Chinese character
and hangul was 'Nok-doo-mun' (the most ancient writing system), according to
the Chun-bu-gyung. Currently, only Koreans still play a game called 'Yout',
which is believed to be very similar to the 'Nok-doo-mun'. The principles of
Yout game are essentially the same as I-Ching. Moreover, in Korea and
Manchuria, currently there are many ancient rocks (dolmen) in which various
kinds of primitive writings are inscribed (see some pictures at
http://myhome.shinbiro.com/~kbyon/culture/rokdo.htm)
Based on these four facts, I strongly argue that the Chinese character was
originated and developed by Koreans. The differences in pronunciation system
for numbers between Chinese and Korean clearly indicates it's Korean origin.
--- Footnote
I add my message on Fu Xi and I-Ching. Fu Xi (or Bokhwi in Korean) is one of
the candidates for the inventor of Chinese characters.
ÏÂÃæ¼ÓÉÏÎҹطüô˵ÄÖ÷Òª¿´·¨¡£·üôË£¨º«Óï³ÆBokhwi£©ÊǺº×ֵķ¢Ã÷ÕßÖ®Ò»¡£
Han and 'I Ching'
ºº´úµÄ'I Ching'
The hexagrams of the I Ching were said to have been created by the
legendary emperor 'Fu Xi' after he had contemplated on a diagram
called Ha Do that was bestowed from the Heaven. Han scholars rewrote
many myths as fact to fill gaps in early Chinese history. Fu Xi was
declared to have been the very first emperor, ruling from 2852 to 2737
BC. He was said to have been the inventor of musical instruments and
Chinese handwriting [1].
'I Ching'µÄÁù½ÇÐÎͼ°¸ËµÊÇ´«ËµÖеĻʵ۷üôËÔÚ¶ÔÉÏÌì´ÍµÄÃûΪ ¡°Ha Do¡±µÄͼ°¸Éî˼ÊìÂÇ´´ÔìµÄ¡£ºº´úѧÕßÖØÐ´ÁË´óÁ¿Éñ»°ÒÔÌî²¹Öйú¹Å´úÊ·µÄȱÏÝ¡£¸µÎý±»Ëµ³ÉÊÇ×îÔçµÄ»ÊµÛ£¬2852 BC-2737 BCÔÚλ¡£ËµËû»¹ÊÇÒôÀÖºÍÊé·¨µÄ·¢Ã÷Õß¡£
×¢£º'I Ching'ÊÇʲ£¬ÎÒСÈ˼ҲÅÊèѧdz£¬Õæ²»ÖªµÀ¡£»á²»»áÊÇ¡¶Ò×¾¡·£¿¡°Ha Do¡±ÊÇ¡¶ºÓͼ¡·Âð£¿
Chinese legend says that Fu Xi is the most senior one among the three
ancestors. Together with N-Wa, the women who he married with, they
started the civilization of human being. The current Fu Xi's Temple in
Shandong was built on a 6-meter high terrace. In the main hall, Fu
Xi's state was placed and sacrifices are given. And in the back of the
hall, N-Wa's statue was placed [2].
Öйú´«Ëµ³Æ·üôËÊÏÈýÎ»×æÏÈÖеØÎ»×î¸ßµÄ¡£ËûºÍŮ洣¬ËûµÄÆÞ×Ó£¬ÒÔÆä¿ª´´ÁËÈËÀàÎÄÃ÷¡£ÏÖÔÚÔÚɽ¶«µÄ·üôËÃí½¨ÔÚÒ»¸ö¸ß6Ã׵į½Ì¨ÉÏ£¬Ö÷µî¹©ÓзüôËÏñ£¬Ç°Áй©Æ·£¬Ö÷µîµÄ±³Ôò¹²ÓÐÅ®æ´Ïñ¡£
It is said that the upper body of Fu Xi is that of a human being while
his lower body is in the xxxx of a snake. Inferring from the
scientific nature of the I Ching, it may just be possible that Fu Xi
was an extraterrestrial. If Fu Xi was indeed the first ancestor of
Chinese, then how could the descendents describe their first ancestor
as a monster? Why did ancient Chinese historians initially consider Fu
Xi as just a legend? Ancient Chinese call their neighboring people as
"bugs" or"barbarians". The monster portrait suggests that Fu Xi might
have been from a neighboring country, not Chinese countries. What was
that country?
˵·üôËÉÏÉíÊÇÈË£¬ÏÂÉíÊÇÉߣ¬¿¼Âǵ½'I Ching'µÄ¿ÆÑ§ÐÔÖÊ£¬Ö»ÓÐÒ»¸ö¿ÉÄÜ£º·üôËÊÏÍâÐÇÈË¡£Èç¹û·üôËÕæµÄÊǺº×åÈ˵ĵÚÒ»¸ö׿ÏÈ£¬ÄÇËûµÄ´úÔõÄܰÑËûÃèÊö³ÉÒ»¸ö¹ÖÎïÄØ£¿ÎªÊ²¹Å´úµÄÖйúÀúʷѧ¼ÒÖ»Êǰѷüô˵±×÷Ò»¸ö´«ËµÈËÎ¹Å´úºº×åÈ˰ÑËûÃǵÄÁÚ¾Ó³Æ×÷¡°³æõô¡±»ò¡°Âù×Ó¡±¡£·üô˵ĹÖÎïÐÎÏó˵Ã÷Ëû¿ÉÄÜÀ´×ÔÁÚ¹ú¶ø²»ÊÇÖйú¡£ÊÇÄĸö¹ú¼ÒÄØ£¿
"Fu Xi came from the nationality called East Yi dwelling in the
Neolithic Age, along the coastal area of the present-day Shandong
Province and, therefore, Fu Xi turned out to have come from Shandong
Province" (quoted from a Chinese site [4])
¡°·üôËÀ´×ÔÐÂʯÆ÷ʱ´úÒ»¸ö³ÆÎª¡°¶«ÒÄ¡±µÄ¹ú¼Ò¡£¸Ã¹úλ½ñÌìµÄɽ¶«Ê¡Ñغ£µØÇø£¬Òò´Ë£¬½áÂÛÊÇ·üôËÀ´×Ôɽ¶«¡£¡°£¨Õª×ÔijÖйúÕ¾£©
What was "East Yi"? Of course, "Yi" means "barbarians" in Chinese.
Most Koreans know what is "Dong (east) Yi". People in 'East Yi' are
known to have been very good at archery, as Korean Olympic archery
teams are today. The Chinese character "Yi" indeed symbolize the
shape of a big bow. Surprisingly. the recently discovered Korean
history text titled "Han Dan Go Gi" describes the life of "Fu Xi"
(Bokhwi in Korean) [3].
¡°¶«ÒÄ¡±ÊÇʲ£¿µ±È»£¬¡°ÒÄ¡±ÔÚººÓïÖÐÊÇ¡°Ò°ÂùÈË¡±Ö®Òâ¡£´ó²¿·Ö¸ßÀöÈËÖªµÀʲ½Ð¡°¶«ÒÄ£¨Dong Yi£©¡±¡£¡°¶«ÒÄ¡±ÈËÒѾ«ÉäÊõÎÅÃû£¬ÕýÈç½ñÌìµÄº«¹úÉä¼ý¶Ó¡£ºº×Ö¡°ÒÄ¡±Êµ±íʾһ°Ñ¹µÄÐÎ×´¡£ÁîÈ˵ÄÊÇ£¬×î½ü·¢ÏÖµÄÃûΪ¡¶Han Dan Go Gi¡·µÄº«¹úÀúÊ·Îı¾ÃèÊöÁË·üôË£¨º«Óï³ÆBokhwi£©µÄÒ»Éú¡£
It writes that he was the son of the 5-th emperor of the Baedal
(B.C.3898- BC 2333) and his surname was "Pung" as he lived in
"Pung-san". Although the surname "Pung" no longer exists in Korean
names, some related words survived to today such as "Pung-chae"
"Pung-gol" and"Pung-shin", all of which are terms for describing human
body shape. Another daughter name was "Yeo-wa" (N-Wa in Chinese) [3].
ÊéÖÐдµ½ËûÊÇBaedalµÛ£¨3898BC-2338BC£©µÄµÚÎå×Ó£¬ÒóסÔÚ¡°Pung-san¡±¶øÐÕ¡°Pung¡±¡£ËäÈ»ÏÖÔÚ¡°Pung¡±Õâ¸öÐÕÊÏÔÚº«¹úÒѲ»Ê¹Ó㬵«ÓÐЩÏà¹ØµÄ´ÊÈç¡°Pung-chae¡±¡¢¡°Pung-gol¡±ºÍ¡°Pung-shin¡±ÈÔÈ»±£´æÁËÏÂÀ´¡£ÕâЩ´Ê¶¼ÊÇÓÃÀ´ÐÎÈÝÈ˵ĸ÷¸ö²¿Î»µÄ¡£ÁíÓÐÒ»¸öÅ®ÃûΪ¡°Yeo-wa¡±£¨ººÓïΪ¡°Å®æ´¡±£©¡£
It writes that she was known to have a magical talent to make a human
being from mud and to be extremely jealous (these two points, together
with the sound, might may remind you of Jehovah) [5].
ÊéÖÐдµ½ËýÒÔ¾ßÓÐÞÒÍÁÔìÈ˵ķ¨Á¦ºÍÉÆ¶Ê¶øÎÅÃû£¨ÕâÁ½µã£¬¼ÓÉÏÉùÒô£¬¿ÉÄÜ»áÈÃÄãÏëÆðÒ®ºÍ»ª£©¡£
|