Place your banner ad here.          See all banner ads

|| || About || Links Library || Help Warn Others ||
|| Madison Church of Christ || Richland Hills Church of Christ || Hillcrest Church of Christ || More Churches || Sunday School in Exile ||

Where is my NewThisWeek Email subscription?Click Here

Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Music in Worship-Jeff Walling

September 22 2004 at 10:58 PM
Bart  (no login)
from IP address

As I read one post condemning Jeff Walling on his view that "music in worship is an gray area and one that is a matter or opinioin", I find myself disturbed. I mean ... isn't it? Can 2 people not disagree on this topic and still serve the same God? I am disturbed that one is comdemned for such a view. The whole argument presented in that posting was that "music in worship in not authorized". Well, now that you mention it, using a song book is not authorized. Using a pitch pipe to remind the song leader of the tune is not authorized. Meeting in Church Buildings is not "authorized" as the early church met in homes! Neither is mid-week bible study, and for the record, the passages we read in I Corinthians 11 where Jesus breaks the bread and passes the cup if from when Jesus instituted the Lords Suppper (Last Supper) on a THURSDAY night **NOT SUNDAY** (passover Thursday) before his crucifiction. I'm not arguing that either of these practices we have is wrong, just the opposite. But tell me, is Sunday night bible study "authorized"? Or did someone decide that once per week was not enough. Let me say that I have grown up in the Church of Christ, and been a member since my baptism at 12 years of age, and I frankly am not ready for them to roll in a piano or organ or guitar in for the Sunday worship, but all we've really got to go on is "sing and make melody in your heart to God". And you and I might not be able to do that with a piano "distracting you", but can you look at your buddy George who sings with the accompanyment of a piano and tell if he's "glorifying GOd in his heart" or not? What about your contemporary Christian musicians? Are they doing Satan's work by getting the message out there in verse with (for heavens sake) instruments in the background? But I read the NIV, which is apparently authored by Satan according to some of the posts on this site, so my thinking is all backwards, right. I just wish someone could answer all my points. Where in this chat room is the love that Christ talks about in His teaching?

 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Part of the answer

September 24 2004, 4:09 PM 

If I can take a shot at this from 2 different directions.

Scriptural - The important one.

I won't start rattling them all off, because I know Ken will follow up with a multicolored, Brittanica sized response anyway. Let me say one thing, though. This non-instrumental worship is not something that the restoration movement guys just came up with in the 1800's. It has its root in scripture. We have become far too accepting of any variation and spin folks want to put on these issues. There is no New Testament pattern to support using instruments in worship. They are mentioned quite a bit in Psalms. I believe their absence from the NT is relevant (in every version). There is one Old Testament principle that I would like to see applied to our worship today. Followers of God in the OT wouldn't have dreamed of adding to or taking away from the example God put out there for them. Cain tried with his sacrifice. Nadab and Abihu tried and it didn't turn out too well. We should prepare ourselves for the possiblity that this actually DOES matter to God. The focus of worship is God, not us. I would imagine if God wanted the instruments, he would have asked for them. As for the songbooks and pitch's apples and oranges.

Practical/Logical - Just think about it.

If it's about a desire to change the churches of Christ, there are PLENTY of denominations out there that already have instrumental music. Most of them differ with us on other significant points of scripture, but a few are pretty similar to us. Why do people want to force a change in the churches of Christ, when they can find a church that is already there? This to me is like the pro-abortion Catholics that get mad because the pope has taken a pro-life stance with the Catholic church. You can get mad if you want, but that is not what your church says. Period. Are you Catholic first or pro-abortion first. If it's about our condemning other denominations, we waste too much time on that as it is. Although God provides us with some good indicators of who's going to heaven and who isn't, he will not consult any of us on the eternal fate of Billy Graham or any other person. If we use that to help us decide who needs to be evangelized, it's a great help. If we use it to remind others that we're going to heaven and they're headed for hell, then shame on us. The reputation for thinking we are the only ones going to heaven has not served us very well over the years. (Then again, neither has the reputation for in-fighting). A reputation for thinking others are lost and actually trying to do something about it might work a little better.

 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Re: Part of the answer

December 3 2006, 2:14 PM 

Whether you post this or not, it really doesn't matter to me. You probably will not, because it pretty much sinks your boat on the subject of usage of instruments during the worship service.

Matthew 28:18 Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you."

You notice there that the command is to "go." Would it be alright if we went out by train? Would it be ok if we went out by foot? What about if we drove a car to spread the Gospel, or by boat, etc.'
God does not tell us how to go, now does He?
God commands us to sing. Does He tell us how to sing?
The shame is to be on those who try to say that everything during that 'sacred' hour has to be authorized.
For the song books, the amplification, etc. there are those who categorize it under "Generic Authority" for doing things well and in decent order.
You want order? Give a pianist music, and he/she will keep time and better pitch than ANY songleader could acappela.
There are those who will try to say that a piano drowns out the voice. Those people are only fooling themselves if they can say that they have never heard a singer being accompanied by a beautiful instrument that is ONLY supporting the singer with LOW background instrumental music. I have heard acapella congregations where the amplification was so loud that the singer drowned out the congregation. Hmmmmmmmm.
In all of Ken Subletts rants which he suggests to be historical data and information, I have never ever seen one ounce of proof that there was EVER any proof that the first century church did not use instrumental music. He can't prove it because the proof simply isn't there. He can tell you about historians of the church who did not prefer it and did not use it in their time but the fact remains is that we are not sure if the apostle and Jesus used or did not use instrumental music.
By the way......please someone show me the scripture backing Generic authority. I still haven't found it. Please don't quote scripture about doing things all things decently and in order......Refer back to previous paragraphs.

I prefer acapella and have never worshipped at a congregation that uses it, but to condemn something that God does not IS SIN. Hence, the term in PREFERRENCE.

Edit away Bill Crump...

 Respond to this message   
Dr. Bill Crump
(no login)

Re: Part of the answer

December 3 2006, 7:36 PM 

I'm not sure why Servant wants to resurrect the IM issue, since it's been hacked to death here and at FaithSite, and no one's mind has ever been changed on either side. Maybe Servant is not quite sure about his position and has to keep talking about it to convince himself that IM is OK, when a close study of the New Testament (NT) shows that it is not. BTW, since I am not a moderator here, I cannot “edit” or remove any post, something vjo just can’t seem to understand. Well, I can’t help that. Now since it would be futile to try to convince Servant of anything about IM, I’ll address a few brief remarks to the general reader who may be sitting on the fence, then for their benefit I’ll reproduce an excellent essay by John Waddey about why churches of Christ reject IM.

Liberals take a typical stance in trying to rationalize God and make God think like man. It should be clear to the faithful that the silence of God is not permissive in matters of doctrine and worship, especially when God has already laid down specific guidelines about certain matters. Singing and making melody in the heart is just one of them. As another example, we can see that God’s silence is not permissive by considering the issue of snorting cocaine in worship. God in the NT is silent about snorting cocaine in worship. Does His silence thus grant us permission to snort cocaine in worship? If snorting cocaine were legal, given its foul effects when it's abused, would God's silence still grant us permission to snort cocaine in worship? Of course not! God speaks of singing through the apostle Paul in Eph. 5:19 and Col. 3:16 but is silent about mechanical instruments. Does God's silence thus grant us permission to use mechanical instruments in worship? Of course not! And that should satisfy the faithful, who aren't looking to satisfy themselves with worldly pleasures in worship.

Frankly, if preferences be had, I would very much prefer to have services with a giant pipe organ. In fact, I was foolish enough to have been organist for a Southern Baptist church for a few years, until I saw the light. But as I said before, if God had never specified the type of music Christians are to give Him in worship, then we would have been free to do as we please and have all the instruments, praise bands, rock groups, Broadway performances, and chorus girls we wanted. But since He HAS given specific directives about music through the apostle Paul, then we are NOT FREE to use any kind of music that we please. To go beyond what God has specified is rebellion and second-guessing Him. Talk about removing God from His throne, those who insist on having instruments in the Christian age do just that; they put themselves ahead of God and are not content to follow exactly the mandates as laid out in the New Testament. Of course, liberals and the rebellious typically call this "legalism," but in reality it is merely their way of saying, "We don't want to be obedient, because we are 'free,' we hates rules, and NOBODY's gonna tell us what to do, let alone some stuffy New Testament!"

Now here's an excellent essay by John Waddey, editor of Christianity: Then and Now on the subject of instrumental music:

Dear Fellow-Christian: Today's lesson deals with the central issue of the change movement. Change agents have decided that we are wrong in insisting on a cappella music in our worship. Some of them are ready to embrace the use of instruments of music in worship and the rest see no harm in so doing. The lesson following explains why we and our predecessors in the faith have rejected them. Please share this lesson with your friends and neighbors in Christ.

- John Waddey



"Bro. Waddey: If Jesus did not condemn the use of instruments in worship, how can we?"
- Mitchell.

Dear Mitchell:
The conclusion we reach will depend upon the concept we hold about how God authorizes a thing. Luther, with others following, argued, “I can do anything the Bible does not condemn.” Zwingle and others correctly argued, “we can only do what God has authorized in his word.” Churches of Christ have followed the Biblical approach of Zwingle. Those who became the Christian Churches and accepted such items as instrumental music in worship followed Luther's concept. Zwingle was right since the Bible lays down that proposition. Note the following:

Jesus instructed us to teach disciples to "observe all things whatsoever (he) commanded" the apostles to do (Matt. 28:20). Anything he taught them, personally while here or through his emissary the Holy Spirit, I am authorized to teach. That which he did not command, I cannot teach with his approval. I can read where we are instructed (thus authorized) to sing unto God, but I cannot read a line about the use of instruments of music in worship. (See Eph. 5:19 and Heb. 2:11-12).

If I abide in the teaching of Christ, I enjoy the blessings of the Father and his Son. If I go beyond that doctrine in my teaching and practice I have not God (II John 9). I can sing praises in worship within the boundaries of Christ's teaching, but to add instrumental accompaniment, I must go outside the teaching of Jesus for my authority. Notice how some go to the Old Testament, some to tradition, some to human wisdom. But no one can find its authorization in the New Testament of Jesus.

Paul warns us in 1 Corinthians 4:6 "not to go beyond the things that are written" in our religious practices. If I abide by his instruction, I can only sing in worship, for that is all that is written. We freely grant that the New Testament nowhere forbids by name the use of instruments, but it does not approve or authorize the practice by the principles stated above.

To argue for instrumental accompaniment on the grounds that it is not specifically forbidden proves too much. Scripture nowhere forbids me to use soft drink for the communion or catsup on the holy bread. Yet all would immediately take exception if I did so. Why? Because Scripture plainly tells us what to use; bread and fruit of the vine (Matt. 26:26-29). If I should not go beyond what is written in the communion worship, on what grounds should I go beyond what is written in the song worship?

Remember, Christ did not condemn instrumental music, burning incense, counting beads, holy water, infant baptism, sprinkling for baptism, clerical uniforms and a hundred other items of humanly originated religious practices. If that justifies us in the use of musical instruments, then it must of necessity approve the other items as well. Few would follow this logic to its end.

As to the matter of church buildings and song books, we must remember that God authorizes things in two ways: (1) Specifically, and (2) Generically. When He instructed Noah to build an ark we see both of these illustrated. The ark, its dimensions and materials were specified. Noah was not free to change the number of decks, windows and doors, not to use any other material than gopher wood (Gen. 6:14-16). The kind of tools, the number of helpers and the schedule of work were not stated. God left this to Noah's judgment. He was authorized to use whatever tools, helpers and schedule he needed to fulfill the general command to build the ark. In like manner, the charge to assemble and worship authorizes Christians to secure a suitable place so as to comply with the command. The command to sing authorizes such incidentals as songbooks, song leaders and pitch pipes.

God's command to build an ark could not be stretched to cover building a permanent temple. It took another command to do that. The authorization to sing cannot be construed to cover a different kind of music such as the instrumental variety.

Of course, since we are under the New Covenant of Christ, the fact that the Hebrews were authorized to use instruments in their temple worship is of no consequence to us. Their use of instruments is in the same category as their use of animal sacrifices, incense and the Levitical priesthood. All were authorized by a former law not currently binding upon us.

Faithful Christians are committed to doing what Christ authorized, in the way he prescribed and for the reason he gave. That is the meaning of restoring New Testament Christianity.

- John Waddey

 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Re: Part of the answer

December 4 2006, 2:14 AM 

The one about the snorting of cocaine was awful. I can't describe it any other way.
It is as bad as the Simon says thing. Simon says...(God says to sing, but we fail the test or game if we add to that with an instrument)....which negates once and for all the man made saying that the silence of God is not permissive.
Bill, I know that you saw my previous post about the great commission and going. God was silent on HOW to go, so He leaves the HOW to us. Now all of sudden you want to change it up with singing??? You can't do that just because you want to hold sacred a long long tradtion Bill.
Remember the saying (since you like these man made sayings)...Be slient where the Bible speaks, and Speak where the Bible is silent.
It really doesn make sense if you think about it Bill, which I know you want, because a liberal bias has overtaken your thinking to produce a huge prejudice against what you don't prefer. That is why you grasp at anything to mask it.
If God tells us something, we listen and obey.....when He doesn't then we use God given common sense, and any examples given. If none given, then we use preferrence.
Bill, back to your snorting. God tells us that our body is a holy temple, and then there is that thing called KNOWING RIGHT FROM WRONG. We KNOW that cocaine is bad for us. So please Bill, you are supposed to be an MD and want to use that line of thinking? That should be a bit embarrassing for you.
Your explanation of the generic authority contained no scriptures....only preferrence.

 Respond to this message   
Dr. Bill Crump
(no login)


December 6 2006, 7:12 PM 

Servant is right: That analogy about snorting cocaine in worship was just awful!

Likewise, John Waddey's analogies about substituting cola and using ketchup during the Lord's Supper were just awful!

Christ never authorized snorting cocaine in worship. He did authorize worshiping Him in spirit and in truth.

Christ never authorized using cola for the cup. He did authorize drinking the fruit of the vine.

Christ never authorized using ketchup during the Lord's Supper. He did authorize eating the bread.

Christ through Paul never authorized using mechanical instruments during worship. He did authorize singing and making melody in the heart.

Just goes to show that adding to, substituting, or removing what God has previously authorized in matters pertaining to worship and doctrine is just awful.

 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Re: Part of the answer

December 6 2006, 6:27 PM 

Hey B:
You mentioned in your post...."Followers of God in the OT wouldn't have dreamed of adding to or taking away from the example God put out there for them. Cain tried with his sacrifice. Nadab and Abihu tried and it didn't turn out too well. We should prepare ourselves for the possiblity that this actually DOES matter to God. The focus of worship is God, not us. I would imagine if God wanted the instruments, he would have asked for them."

If that is so about the followers of God not dreaming of adding or taking away from the example, then certainly instrumental music should never be condemned. Do you really believe that God would have allowed the Psalms printed with something the He did not condone? Yes, the focus of worship is God...>ALWAYS. That being so, then should not we use the example of a David when using EVERYTHING within and without our being to Praise our God??? When David worshiped God, he left nothing out. It was heart and soul totally only for God. He said "praise him with cymbals, harps, lyres, etc." because he felt like these instruments were beautiful sounding, and ANYTHING that sounded beautiful, inluding our voices should praise Him., THUS... Psalm 150: 6 Let everything that has breath praise the LORD.
Praise the LORD.

Hey B.....did God EVER ask David to use instruments to praise Him?
If you think about it B, doesn't it go along with the parable of talents? To not use ALL of our talents for God is not acceptable. Will God point out to us everything that we must do in order to please Him???

 Respond to this message   
Donnie Cruz
(no login)

Re: Music in Worship—Jeff Walling

September 27 2004, 2:35 AM 

Let me add to B’s comments: “As for the songbooks and pitch's apples and oranges.” That’s a good analogy. I don’t hear the sound of the pitch pipe. Now, I’m curious to see someone use the pitch pipe throughout the singing of every hymn—has anyone thought about the feasibility of this? I imagine it would take years and years of practice and training to proficiently use the pitch pipe like an instrument while singing a hymn. Hmmm! The songbook does not sing nor create a sound or noise … well, unless I drop it when and while it’s all really quiet in the meeting place.

Bart has made a good point about meeting in church buildings as being authorized. Meeting in homes would be ideal. But I would like to know of homes big enough to accommodate hundreds, or even thousands, of members to fellowship one with another. Meanwhile, the scriptures speak of instances of expediency wherein principles or the truth is not violated. I wouldn’t be surprised if the early Christians met in the synagogues—Christ and the apostles certainly preached and taught in the synagogues.

Where is the authority for mid-week Bible study? Well, there is authority for studying the scriptures anytime. We are to exhort one another daily (Heb. 3:13). The early disciples at Berea searched the scriptures daily (Acts 17:10-11). And we know what “all scripture is” in II Timothy 3:16. I’m afraid we’re not even up to the task in our study of God’s word.

In regard to the observance of the Lord’s Supper, let’s just stay with Acts 20:7 as the disciples came to break bread “upon THE first day of THE week.” And with the evidences from the early writers of church history that Christians in the first century did observe the Lord’s Supper every first day of the week.

Yes, let’s stay with what you said that “but all we've really got to go on is ‘sing and make melody in your heart to God’"—no more, no less. Everything else is speculative in regard to “teaching and admonishing one another in psalms, hymns and spiritual songs.”


 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Eating Meat

September 27 2004, 5:12 PM 

You guys need to read ROMANS before you go spouting about DISPUTABLE matters that you hav opinions about, but no facts.

I guess that God ENJOYED instruments, but now DOESN'T.....

Your argument about pitch pipes and song books is LAUGHABLE. Give me a BREAK!!! Either they are WRONG or they are OK based upon your original argument about instruments. No "authorization" NO GO! Be consistent will you? I am.


 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Music in Worship

March 1 2005, 1:50 PM 

One needs to consider the entire text of the Bible in order to answer this question fully. All I want you to look at is this: God, throughout scripture is consistant in all He does. From the beginning to the return of Christ, God has things placed in a specific order. If God has laid out all of these things in a specific order, why would our worship to Him be any different. God is specific about His order for our worship to Him that He doesn't need but undoubtly deserves. Therefore, if He wanted instrumental music engaged into the public worship, He would have specified. As far as contemporary christian music, we are not in a place of public worship assembled with other believers when listening to this. Remember Christ said to the disciples about those casting out demons and performing miracles in His name, "those who are for us are not against us", anyone that uses different means to spread the Gospel outside of the public worship are for the kindgoms expansion, not against it.


 Respond to this message   
John Rebman
(no login)

Music in Worship

March 3 2005, 7:33 AM 

I thought I would throw this out to you gentleman. I was confronted with this question. Do we in the churches of Christ believe that to substitute a word, that changes the meaning of the text is a sin? I said to my inquirer: "Why yes."

He asked, "does the New Testament says that man is saved by faith?" quoting Romans 5:1 and Galatians 5:6?
He goes on to say, you believe Denominationalists ADD the word ONLY, formulating the doctrine of faith only" (Revelation 22:18; 11 John:9).

"When God said sing, and men ADD the word ONLY, formulating the doctrine of SING ONLY what is the actual difference?"

He quoted Acts 16:15: "Paul, Silas and Luke baptized Lydia and her HOUSEHOLD. ADD the word infants, assuming that all households have infants, and you have the apostles practcing infant baptism."

He asked, "Does a false premise produce a false conclusion?"
"You believe God commands an alien sinner to believe, repent, confess faith in Christ, be immersed in water for the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit."

He asked, "would this individual be considered a believer, a term which includes each act of faith required to make him a Christian?" I agreed.

He then quoted 1 Peter 3:21: "baptism does also now save us."
Asking, if I "thought this part (baptism)stood for the whole, the other acts of faith not being SPECIFIED but included?" My answer: "yes."

He reminded me that "the Jerusalem church, praised God, which included any and all acceptable acts of praise since no certain one was specified."

His question: "Do you believe psallo means the heart strings are plucked, twitched, twanged?"
"If so, would you show me the verse in the New Testament where the heart is a musical instrument?"
I replied: authentic evidence is unavailable to prove that the heart is a "musical instrument."
He quoted Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and despertely wicked: who can know it?"

He then asked, "Could a false premise produce a false conclusion?"

 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(no login)

Re: Music in Worship

March 3 2005, 4:12 PM 

To connect MUSIC as WORSHIP has the same ORIGIN as to connect SEXUALITY to WORSHIP. It is ANTI-Biblical and ANTI-Christian and universally perverted and perverting. That means that even Plato warned that it is CATCHING.

Worship means to GIVE HEED to God in Christ by giving attendance to the public reading of that word. The PLACE is called a synagogue or school of the Bible and NOT a pagan worship center where "worship" ot THRESKIA always meant wine, women and song and more!
    He reminded me that "the Jerusalem church, praised God, which included any and all acceptable acts of praise since no certain one was specified."
In the Old Testament you can PRAISE (make self vile) your God or gods WHILE USING a harp. However, PRAISE is something you SPEAK. You cannot wail like lost banshees and clamor PRAISE GOD, PRAISE GOD --repeat 21 times and do ANYTHING but praise self and make a fool of yourself before God and most people.
    And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things that they had HEARD and SEEN, as it was TOLD unto them. Lu.2:20

    Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. Ac.2:47

The word praise is from:
    Ainos (g136) ah'ee-nos; appar. a prim. word; prop. a story, but used in the sense of 1868; praise (of God): - praise.

    And we have sent with him the brother, whose praise is IN THE GOSPEL throughout all the churches; 2Co.8:18

    Aineô (cf. ainêmi, ainizomai), impf.
    b. esp. in religious sense, glorify God,

    Epaineô being used instead:--properly, TELL, SPEAK

    And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and SAYING, Lu.2:13

    For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our LEARNING, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope. Rom 15:4

    That ye may with one mind and one mouth GLORIFY [praise] God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Rom 15:6

Isaiah defined keeping FALSE SABBATHS in Amos. This included God condemning MUSICAL performance RATHER THAN speaking God's Words and practicing tmen:
    Take thou away from me the noise of thy songs; for I will not hear the melody of thy viols. Am.5:23

    BUT let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream. Amos 5:24

    IF thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy PLEASURE on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor SPEAKING THINE OWN WORDS Is.58:13

It is utterly IMPOSSIBLE to glorify God unless you 'teach that which has been taught.' SINGING is NOT: Paul said SPEAK the inspired Biblical text

Except as included with ballet and gymnastics for the warriors to give them MELODY or HARMONY in their battle attack, no one attributes to music anything other than having PLEASURE. Psalm 41 prophesied that Judas would not TRIUMPH OVER Jesus where TRIUMPH or ALARM means to play instruments and "make a joyful noise before the Lord." I have told you what the preacher will not: this was NOT musical worship but MUSIC always means to create a sense of PANIC which the traffickers peddle as SPIRITUAL:
    DSS: They have overtaken me in a narrow pass (gap) without escape
    And there is no rest for me in my trial.
    They sound my censure upon a harpand their murmuring and storming upon a zither." Ps.41:11

    However, Jesus would WIN over the musical WARRIOR LEVITES:

    I will groan with the zither of lamentation
    in all grief-stricken mourning and bitter complaint
    until iniquity and wickedness are consumed
    and the disease-bringing scourge is no more.

    Then will I play on the zither of deliverance
    and harp of joy,
    on the tabors of prayer and the pipe of praise
    without end.

    I will sing with knowledge and all my music
    shall be for the glory of God.
    (My) lyre (and) my harp shall sound
    for His holy order
    and I will tune the pipe of my lips
    to His right measure.

Paul in Romans 15 OUTLAWED that. Jesus agreed with Isaiah 58 which OUTLAWS speaking your own words when the HOLY CONVOCATION meant to READ or REHEARS the Words of God. If you sing Twila Paris or Keith then you are WORSHIPING them and you cannot deny that it is to KEITH and TWILA that you are GIVING HEED TO and it is impossible to otherwise.
    His question: "Do you believe psallo means the heart strings are plucked, twitched, twanged?"

    "If so, would you show me the verse in the New Testament where the heart is a musical instrument?"

    I replied: authentic evidence is unavailable to prove that the heart is a "musical instrument."

    He quoted Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and despertely wicked: who can know it?"

    Jer 17:10 I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings.

    Plautus, Curculio CAPPADOX My spleen is killing me, my reins are in torment, my lungs are being torn asunder, my liver is being tortured, my heart-strings are giving way, all my intestines are in pain.

    Hecuba Alas! a dreadful trial is near, it seems, [230] full of mourning, rich in tears. Yes, I too escaped death where death had been my due, and Zeus did not destroy me but is still preserving my life, that I may witness in my misery fresh sorrows surpassing all before. But if the bond may ask the free of things that do not GRIEVE them or WRENCH their heart-strings, you ought to speak in answer to my questions and I ought to hear what you have to say.

Whatever PSALLO means. Paul insisted that it be DONE IN THE HEART. By using the PARALLEL word GRACE he meant a QUALITY OF THE MIND OR HEART and not a HARP.

You might have defined a PSALM which is a GREEK word:
    Psal-mos'; from 5567; a set piece of music, i.e. a sacred ode
    with the VOICE,
    or OTHER instrument; a "psalm");
    collect. the book of the Psalms: - psalm. Comp. 5603.

You might have quoted Ephesians 5:19! The word PSALLO simply means that you TOUCH something. The word TOUCH absolutely restricts psallo to how it is defined and how it is ALWAYS used. A similar base word is used by EVE who grasped that she was not being asked to EAT an APPLE but engage in sexual intercourse and Paul told us that she was WHOLLY SEDUCED John told us that Cain was OF that wicked one.
    Naga (g5060) naw-gah'; a prim. root; prop. to touch, i. e. lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphem., to lie with a woman); by impl. to reach (fig. to arrive, acquire); violently, to strike (punish, defeat, destroy, etc.): - beat, (* be able to) bring (down), cast, come (nigh), draw near (nigh), get up, happen, join, near, plague, reach (up), smite, strike, touch.

    Nega (h5061) neh'-gah; from 5060; a blow (fig. infliction); also (by impl.) a spot (concr. a leprous person or dress): - plague, sore, stricken, stripe, stroke, wound.

    Nagan (h5059) naw-gan'; a prim. root; prop. to thrum, i. e. beat a tune with the fingers; espec. to play on a stringed instrument; hence (gen.) to make music: - player on instruments, sing to the stringed instruments, melody, ministrel, play (-er, -ing..

Remember that our HEART is our mind which controls the brain: the brain is made up of stuff which is more like HEART STRINGS than BOW STRINGS. Everything we feel is in the brain. Why not toss out the children playing games and give it a workout.

Why aren't you ANGRY with yourself for being EXTORTED out of that money to PAY hirelings who have been BLINDED by God for minimizing His Gord? Rather than getting stroked by the Madness Minister look what you could SEE if you loved the Lord and PRAISED Him by repeating HIS songs and sermons? More later.


 Respond to this message   
C King
(no login)

Instruments introduced in AD 666

September 18 2006, 9:58 PM 

Many years ago while teaching a co-worker the Gospel of Christ, I was asked
by his mother why we did not use instruments of music in the worship and I
responded that there was no authority in the New Testament. She then asked me to find out when it came into the worship.
I looked for three days as time permitted to find the answer, it seemed to alude me at every turn. Finally I found it under music history.
What I found was that in AD 666 the Emporer Constans II made a present of some pagan artifacts taken from temples to pope Vitalian. Included in this was a primative organ, which he liked and decided that it would be a good aid to the worship, thus the Mark was given and by AD 670 it had to be removed due the resistance of the turmull it generated. (this is the 1260 days of
It was reintroduced in AD 757 When one was given to Pepin, King of the Franks.
After this it was gradually impliminted in all man's churches.




 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(no login)

Instruments added.

September 18 2006, 10:58 PM 

I will check to make sure that I have that one. I began with a small list about 25 years ago and have added other lists and lots of research on my on. As I have time I have been adding links to these quotes mostly on my home page because too many of the other links go dead and you cannot count on them.

If anyone has others I will add them. The point is that the musical madness flies in the face that the Bible and all known repudiates them and connects music as does the Bible to telling God "we will not listen to your words." I don't see how one would even need to try to prove that because it seems self-evident.

 Respond to this message   
David L. Nicholson
(no login)

"Instruments Added"

October 31 2006, 10:55 PM 

I was raised in the church of Christ; accepted the old time ways...preached 23 yers - masters degree - ACU - realized what many have said in these arguments. My "brethren" were ok but not actually better or more dedicated than the "denominatuional Christians."
Finally, i saw and experienced enough ... left c oh C - looked at "sporot filled churches." They are more dogmatic that c of C. Finally found Methodist Church 18 years ago Much more spiritual... Let the c of C "do its thing." If you do not like it LEAVE! I have made many mistakes in life but leaving the c of C was NOT one of them. Praise God ... "i saw the light... I saw th light...." If you feel strong on only acapello music stay in c of C; if you do not then leave and leave the c of C alone. Everyone is happy!

 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Re: Music in Worship-Jeff Walling

December 16 2006, 12:58 PM 

On the topic of music...I'd be interested in hearing your responses to this article I found.

 Respond to this message   
(Login Melancholia888)

Re: Music in Worship-Jeff Walling

December 16 2006, 1:06 PM 

On the topic of music in worship, I would be very interested in hearing your thoughts on this news article I found.

 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(no login)

E-mail to the Christian Chronicle.

December 16 2006, 6:52 PM 

You DO know that the Christian Chronicle is the ORGAN of the change movement. All of the once "christian" colleges have been DIVERTED and you can no longer trust them. After all, If I were Satan and you built a college I would STAFF it and STIFF it with my oen "angels of light".

Dear Christian Chronicle:

It comes as no surprise that Rick Atchley lifts the 'proof texts' from writers like Tom burgess who quotes historical scholars where PSALLO is used. He does not tell you that all of these references point to very naughty older males. Google Tom Burgess, A. Ralph Johnson or Alfred Knowles to see how the STANDARD HANDBOOK misrepresents ever fact.

Secondly, I have begun posting a rebuttal on concerned Members which you can find just by googling Rick Atchley. Rick quotes tidbits in a very vocal way but each and every CONTEXT proves that the use of instrumental music was NOT approved anywhere in the Bible. Missing from bible 101a is that the king, kingdom and temple were DDED afte musical idolatry at Mount Sinai. The ELDERS picking a "senior pastor" to replace God has God pronouncing the final sentence on Israel and Judah to be carried out by the kings.

The temple sacrificial system was a NATIONAL system because Stephen tells us that god turned them over to worship the starry host (acts 7). At the same time, the Qahal, synagogue or church in the wilderness never met except for instructions: sabbath does not mean saturday but REST. On those holy days they werre to READ and REHEARSE the word from God.

The "civilians" were in fact quarantined from the sacrificial system where the "musicians" made noise and not music and their SERVICE means hard bondage.

We are caught with out literacy down and Rick uses a lot of harsh words while tall of his proof texts are NOT the Biblical truth.

Ken Sublett.

I suggest that everyone write them: not that the INSTITUTES have any relevance any more.

 Respond to this message   
Ralph Johnson
(no login)

Strange claims

December 31 2006, 3:28 AM 

Ken's claims that nowhere in the Bible was instrumental music commanded by God and that it was entirely from immoral sources is really strange. The Psalms repeatedly commanded and called instrumental music "good". An instrument was commanded to be played over the sacrifices in the tabernacle. It was plainly said to have been instituted in the Temple as a "command of Jehovah."

A. Ralph Johnson

 Respond to this message   
(no login)

Re: Strange claims

December 31 2006, 5:05 PM 

You will truely see (if you spend any time on this site) that the word you used in "strange" is strange indeed when it comes to Ken Sublett.
Scriptures really don't matter to him. Scriptures just get in the way of the Truth.
He is out to battle the evil and the Good.
It really doesn't make sense.
He is not only against instrumental music, but also singing in general, which proves another point Ralph.
The regulars here (Jimmy Wren, Bill Crump, Donnie Cruz, etc.) laud that the command is "to sing", and sing without any instrumental music. They then ALLOW Ken to rant and rave that EVEN singing is evil.
There is no common ground even between the regulars here.
They can't even agree about what to agree on.
It borders on commical.

 Respond to this message   
< Previous Page 1 2 Next >
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

This web site is not part of or approved by any Church!

...........................THE BOOK

What Happened at the Madison Church of Christ?

There are thousands of churches being taken over across America.

This book is only about one of those churches. It's about the Madison Church Of Christ. By studying the methods used here along with the resource references you might be able to inoculate your church. At the very least you will recognize the signs early on.

Many of the current members of the Madison Church of Christ still don't know what happened.
Some never will know! This book is for them as well.

Madison Church of Christ was a 60 year old church. At one time it was one of the largest churches in the US, and the largest Church of Christ.

It thrived for many years on the vision of it's elders and those of it's ministers. Those visions undoubtably came from the the inspired word of Jesus Christ.

At sometime in the last 10 years there was a deliberate plan by a majority of the elders to take the Madison Church of Christ into a more worldly realm.

They used secrecy, covert planning, and outside sources to scheme and to change the format and direction of the Madison Church of Christ.

The Elders knew that the membership would never approve such a plan. Using the tools of the "Community Church Movement"(consultants, books, seminars, meetings,planters,seeders) they slowly started initiating change so it was never noticed by the members until it was too late.....

At the heart of the plan was the fact that old members were going to be driven off so new techniques could be used to go out and reach the unchurched through new "Contemporary Holy Entertainment" methods developed by the "Community Church Movement"

Old members had to be kept on board long enough to get their plans ready, or the funds would not be there to pay for the new building. So by the plans very nature, it had to be secret.

The church had no plan in effect to renew or approve elders. There was never any need. The elders had always been "as approved by God". 10 of the last 15 elders would begin to shed some doubt on that.

The Elders did not even need a majority at first, because some of the elders went along unwittingly.

This edition starts shortly after some of the members begin to smell something strange in January 2001. Later editions may go back and fill in some of the timeline.

To even start to understand whats happening here, you must read the background materials in the first of the book.

This is only the first edition, and not the end. New editions will be printed as needed. To keep abreast of current changes, please visit our web site;

Here is the list of players;

5 Godly Elders
10 Not so Godly Elders
120 "Deacons" (allegiance unknown)
2,800 - 4,000 church "members"
2 "teners" (people who have publicly confessed to have broken all ten commandments)
Unknown number of "sinners" (This is what the 10 elders call us.)
Unknown number of "demons" (Flying everywhere, to many to count)

Click Here......The Book is Available Now FREE

Place your banner ad here.           See all banner ads ...About ...Links Library ...Sunday School in Exile ...Help Warn Others

FastCounter by bCentral

CM Visit Counter as of 6/25/2015

Site Visits Since 6/30/2015
page counter