WHAT HAPPENED AT MADISON THIS WEEK—The Timeline (Part X)
May 8 2005 at 2:42 AM
ConcernedMembers (no login) from IP address 68.19.246.227
February 2001
Most Madison Church of Christ members were oblivious to this article, “More Holyroller Influence at Madison” in the February "Plumbline Newsletter" which quotes the "Madison Marcher.”
The third worship service at Madison is to be held at the same time as the 10:30 a.m. worship. The "atmosphere will be more conducive to non-Christians. Many “unchurched” people are intimidated by a more formal atmosphere...." The worship affair will be an effort "...to make it easier for people with no church background to feel comfortable.... More time will be given to singing and communion... The sermons will not be as long as what we are used to. There is no question that God is working among our church family. He recognized our suppressed capacity to love…. Attendance for this first Sunday was 538 souls." Jim Hinkle said, "We will not be still, we will not be quiet."
February 2001
The elders announced that a "Third Contemporary" service that they had previously formed was going to be melted into the 10:00 a.m. or second service.
This announcement established a "contemporary service" at 10:00 AM and the 8:00 AM service remained unchanged. While making this announcement, Elder Buck Dozier said the Fire Marshal’s office had said there were too many people in the third service for the size of the auditorium. Since Buck is the past Fire Chief, one has to wonder if this was just a staged excuse to proceed with what was already planned.
February 25, 2001
Tom Haddon is instructing his "Homebuilders" class on how to transition the church members over to the ways of the Saddleback Community Church and that of "Holy Entertainment." He talks about the well laid plans that only a few know about. See the transcript of February 25th class.
March 2001
Praise teams, hand clapping, and raised hands during prayer have been introduced at the second service. Children’s Sunday school has been changed from Bible-based to more entertainment and singing. Young women teaching Sunday school to baptized young men.
April 13, 2001
The elders respond to a NewsChannel5 report about growing controversy at the Madison Church of Christ. They send out a LETTER to 683 Churches of Christ in the Channel 5 viewing area.
"The controversy seems to be over-reaction to change. The main things we have done in the 10:30 service are introduce more upbeat praise songs, give less time to the sermon, and give greater emphasis to the Lord's Supper. This embraces a more contemporary format, of course, but we don't feel that it departs from scriptural worship."
See ConcernedMembers’ Letter to the Elders of 683 Churches of Christ.
April 22, 2001
In this meeting on April 22, 2001 the deacons ask the elders, “What is going on?” On May 02,2001 the Elders reply in a letter. Here Are the Questions and the Elders’ Answers
May 2001
Concerned members receive a copy of a rough draft of a "Covenant of Membership" that was supposedly written by Elder Buck Dozier. Mr. Dozier admitted "playing" around with one when contacted.
The concern about a "Covenant of Membership" is that it's one of the hallmark signs of a "Community Church" like Saddleback. They are generally written in such a way to assure that the membership can't take over the "community church" like they took over your church.
July 2001
According to THIS ARTICLE in the Tennessean, the elders bring in a mediator (Larry Sullivan) to help with the split within the church. We understand that Buck Dozier met Mr. Sullivan while attending a "seminar." Meetings are set up for the elders—we understand they had to swear to secrecy. Meetings are set up for the members to discuss their objections to the split contemporary and traditional services.
It's later shown by the ConcernedMembers that LARRY SULLIVAN is not an unbiased mediator. He has direct ties to the Saddleback organization. He is trained in using the HEGELIAN DIALECTIC techniques to compromise a groups consensus in whatever direction is predetermined.
Mid-August, 2001
By this time many members have left the Church. The unpaid volunteer minister on this particular Sunday abruptly left before giving his sermon at the second service. He was allowed only the last 6 minutes of worship time by the “worship leader.” Sometime during this period, Buck Dozier appeared in Bill Ruhl's adult class to take over. Bill Ruhl's absence was unexplained to the class.
August 29, 2001
Concerned members send out 2500 ballots and a LETTER asking for church members to indicate on the ballot the type of church service format they wanted. All ballots were to be received by September 20, 2001. Threatening phone calls are received by the contractor hired by ConcernedMembers to do the mailing (August 30, 2001). Other notes not full of brotherly love are received by mail. Ballots from ConcernedMembers mailing are tabulated, and totals posted along with a FINAL REPORT (September 15, 2001)
September 23, 2001
The members have been waiting on an announcement from the elders regarding the future format of services at the Madison Church of Christ. Today (09-23-01) that announcement was made.
EVERYTHING WILL REMAIN AS IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
September 30, 2001 (Sunday)
Larry Sullivan was Guest Speaker! (The Unbiased Mediator)
October 11, 2001 (Thursday)
Deacons had a special meeting with an attendance of over 100 concerned members and deacons. Petitions were given out to collect signatures—to dismiss “the elders that have split the Madison Church of Christ.” Petitions are due to be turned in by Wednesday the 17th.
October 14, 2001 (Sunday)
Frank Scott delivered his first in a series of talking head animated and canned sermons. Sometime during this period, two elders resigned—J.D. Elliott and Bobby McElhiney.
October 17, 2001 (Wednesday)
A member reported that Wednesday night when she inquired at the help desk as to where she should turn in her petitions, she was told by the lady: "Over there with the trouble makers … they are the mafia." Sometime during this period two more elders talked about resigning! No confirmation of that as of today.
October 21, 2001 (Sunday)
Sermon—Second in a three-part series of Frank Scott being a talking head for a canned and animated sermon on joy and entertainment. The words "corporate worship" and joy and entertainment were used extensively. Interesting!
Deacons—The deacons, headed by Ben Jones, nicely and in a very godly way asked the leaders to step down and let the church elect new leadership. (Complete transcript is available.)
October 24, 2001 (Wednesday)
”Elders and Deacons” meeting tonight! We understand that the 7 or 8 elders that have caused a split at Madison Church of Christ have been formally asked to step down or be disfellowshipped.
October 25, 2001 (Thursday)
”Saddleback Planters” meeting tonight! Talked about rebuking Ben Jones Sunday!
To rebuke is to criticize or reprove sharply; to reprimand.
To reprove is to criticize for a fault or misdeed; to scold.
To rebuke or reprove Ben Jones, then, Ben Jones must have done a misdeed.
To define that misdeed, those who will rebuke him must find applicable scriptures.
What Ben did was to give each and every Madison Church of Christ member an opportunity to ask for forgiveness or repentance for causing division or for allowing division to occur.
October 26, 2001 (Friday)
Flash message coming in the next 72 hours from the ConcernedMembers!
October 28, 2001 (Sunday)
T H E...M A D I S O N...C H U R C H...O F...C H R I S T...H A S...B E E N...H I J A C K E D ! !
Today, according to an announcement made by everyone's favorite elder, Russ Kersten, the church has been hijacked by all the concerned members, deacons and I guess that includes the 5 elders that have been holding out against them. … Is “hijack” a chargeable offense in the church?
October 29, 2001 (Monday)
We received a copy of a letter sent to the deacons. And we felt compelled to reply. ConcernedMembers announced future plans (10/30/01). The server for this web page has recorded 22,645 page views since its creation 8 weeks ago (11/1/01).
November 2, 2001
Transcript of Homebuilders Sunday School class—a recording of Tom Haddon on how to transition the congregation to Saddleback and Holy Entertainment in Homebuilders Class (available under Interviews & Transcripts).
November 4, 2001
J.R. Compton and wife, members at Madison Church of Christ for 58 years, came before congregation to ask for forgiveness and ask to have their names removed as members.
November 7, 2001
Interview with Gary McDade of the Getwell Church of Christ in Memphis, TN. Discussion concerning the takeover of churches by the "Community Church" movement and the embracement of this movement by many of the Christian colleges.
November 9, 2001
Two different sources say Bruce White has been hired as a new minister.
November 20, 2001
ConcernedMembers retract a letter sent by the elders to 683 churches of Christ.
November 21, 2001
Email from J.E. Choate—“And also another personal evaluation is that Buck Dozier should be the first to leave the Madison eldership. His qualifications for the work is moot at best. His past shows that he is no stranger to igniting church fires with no solutions."
Bruce White appears to have been warmly welcomed as new minister at the Madison Church of Christ. First sermon was about the degrees of love. It appears that the “Praise Team” and their microphones have been turned off in the second service for the time being.
December 18, 2001
Fundraising letter sent out by the Church. Student ministry letter to former members (12/19/01).
January 20, 2002 (Sunday)
Rumor says there is a new group forming called "The PeaceMakers." Their training is probably coming from PEPPERDINE.
January 21, 2002 (Monday)
Letter sent by Donnie Cruz to the elders and other people about the crisis at Madison. The Christian Chronicle publishes article about Madison Church of Christ (01/21/02).
February 4, 2002 (Monday)
We understand that Buck has presented the members of “The Peacemakers" with a list of 192 reasons churches split. We wonder if pagan worship practices were on the list?
February 6, 2002 (Wednesday)
Big flare-up at church Wednesday night. We understand 4 or 5 of the good and godly elders have resigned, leaving the church under the control of the clapper and Saddleback crowd.
February 9, 2002 (Saturday)
After the resignation of two elders last year, Madison Church of Christ was left with 13 elders: Bill Bennett, Dale Bishop, John Broadway, Joe Corley, Buck Dozier, Chris Gingles, Howard Henderson, Tommy Hoppes, Russ Kersten, Charles Link, Ken Rice, Norman Slate, Ray Wilson. Five of these elders had been opposed to the "praise teams" and clapping which had permeated the second service since last February 2001. This was when Elder Buck Dozier first announced the decision to turn the new third service loose on the second service. The five elders that were opposed we believe were: Joe Corley, Bill Bennett, Dale Bishop, Norman Slate, and Charles Link.
It's understood Tom Haddon and about 200 of his followers threatened to leave sometime ago when the praise teams were stopped. It's understood that Chris Gingles encouraged them to stay and fight it out. Recently the Haddon followers put the push back on to bring back the praise teams, through the elders they control. It's understood that the elders had become rather hostile toward each other, and when this push came again, then 4 of the 5 elders resigned. Charles Link was out of town, and it is assumed he will resign when he returns.
Quote as told to Bobby M. Johnson by one of the elders: "... told me that there had been a recent meeting of the 10:30 AM crowd including Chris Gingles’ and Tom Haddon's followers and they said they would never leave. So that with the push to return to the praise teams and the microphones was the “last straw."
The 5 elders had already decided to resign if the “winds of change” didn't subside. So that's that! 3 of these elders also announced that they would probably be attending church at other locations sometime in the future. [No one here blames them, and we can only try to imagine the pain they have been put through. We are sure that like many of us they were unable to continue to worship in that building.]
Sunday Services reviewed by Donnie Cruz [see earlier “Timeline”]
February 11, 2002 (Monday)
We at ConcernedMembers have been told that when the 4 elders resigned, that they were assured that their letter would be read to the congregation. Well, as you are probably aware ... not only did their letter not get read, there was also no mention of their resignation, other than a little blip in the Marcher. We have been promised a copy of this letter, and we intend to post it on the web as soon as we get it up.
The Elders’ Resignation Letter Is Here [see earlier “Timeline”]
February 2-17, 2002
Announcement by the Elders [see earlier “Timeline”]
March 1, 2002
The Trap Has Been Set at the Madison Church of Christ [see earlier “Timeline”]
In the February 20, 2002 Madison Marcher, statement made by the elders February 17, 2002:
4. "We believe that there can be unity in diversity and will continue to employ two styles of worship services."
March 10, 2002 (Sunday)
Screen presentation of the elders [6 have already resigned] and their length of service helps Donnie Cruz to figure it out:
(1) John Broadway ...... since 1998
(2) Buck Dozier ........ since 1996
(3) Chris Gingles ...... since 1998
(4) Howard Henderson ... since 1999
(5) Tommy Hoppes ....... since 1999
(6) Russ Kersten ....... since 1992
(7) Charles Link ....... since 1978
(8) Ken Rice ........... since 1989
(9) Ray Wilson ......... since 1992
(Most of the Remaining Elders Are ... That Explains It! [see earlier “Timeline”])
March 24, 2002 (Sunday)
Charismatic Contemporary Style Continues: March 24, 2002 [see earlier “Timeline”]
I don’t believe it is all right to be singing “It’s All Right” when the church is not united in spirit because of what this worship facilitation program has done to begin with. It is NOT ALL RIGHT when the body of Christ is suffering….
March 31, 2002
SUNDAY SERVICES—“Easter"
Notes from the “Madison Marcher” (Wednesday, March 27, 2002):
Bruce White: “We are going to have a great day next Sunday. It is Easter, and we [are] looking for a large crowd. I especially want to see the children in the colorful clothes.” Of the “Great Day in May” (May 5): “… will have a big lunch under the tent at 12:00. One of our choruses will entertain at 1:30.”
May 19-26, 2002; June 2, 2002
Changes Continue At Madison [see earlier Timeline]
(1) the present deacons will be interviewed by the elders and new deacons will be named; (2) there will be additional elders to be selected; (3), the "love feast" -- and it's only "fitting" -- is to follow the Lord's Supper; (4) Canaan's Land is moving; (5) the "praise team" will be reinstated in the early part of July.
June 23, 2002 (Sunday)
ELDER CHARLES LINK RESIGNS, and more!
August 1, 2002
Is There a Tithing Pledge in Madison's Future? Donnie Cruz reports, there could be!
September 1, 2002 (Sunday)
Small Groups, Living Stones, or Prayer Circles?
October 27, 2002
TITHING NT Christians for Services of the OT Levitical Priests
We are continuing to monitor the progress of the tithing campaign at Madison as taught by Dr. White, based on the tithing manual (“Take God at His Word”) written by Dr. Kregg Hood. Is the truth about tithing (equals 10%) continuing to be perverted as a CARRY-OVER and as a PERPETUAL command from the Old Testament for New Testament Christians? Since Dr. White proclaimed his message in August 2002 that we TITHE to TEST God and to let Him give the increase, we will be referring to the following amounts collected as being “TITHED”:
==================================================================
Church Budget ----------------- 47,143 (2001) ---- 38,000 (2002)
Children’s Home ---------------- 5,400 (2001) ----- 4,021 (2002)
Amazing Grace/CPI -------------- 3,000 (2001) ----- 1,539 (2002)
==================================================================
TOTAL BUDGET---- -------------- 55,543 (2001) ---- 43,560 (2002)
==================================================================
------------- (Sermons on “TITHING” in August 2002) ------------
November 7, 2002
Transcription of Bruce White's Sermon on Tithing [see earlier Timeline]
VOTE:
Would you be willing to sign a Tithing Pledge?
Would you be willing to sign a Church Oath or Covenant?
January 5, 2003 (Sunday)
DRAMA MINISTRY KICKOFF JANUARY 19 (by Kelley Hughes, Madison Marcher)
Drama is nothing new at Madison Church of Christ. From the Summer Spectaculars to Canaan’s Land … we have a long and great tradition of using drama to touch the lives of our members and visitors…. So Jesus himself used A TYPE OF THEATRE to help get his point across…. You may know of someone who is “UNCHURCHED” … The Drama Ministry kickoff meeting will be on January 19 at 5 p.m. in the Fellowship Hall.
April 13, 2003 (Sunday)
EASTER SUNDAY IN “CANAAN’S LAND” (Madison Marcher: April 9, 2003)
Easter Sunday is very special to all of us. For the last ten years in Canaan’s Land, we’ve used our time together on that Sunday to reenact the last week in the life of Jesus…. Responsibilities will range from … to dressing kids to assisting at the various story “sets” (e.g., HELPING SERVE CHILDREN BREAD AND GRAPE JUICE DURING THE LAST SUPPER [emphasis, d.c.]). All of us will celebrate Communion together as we reenact the LORD sharing it with His apostles and telling them its meaning.
(On May 19, 2003, Chris: “I received a copy of the CD that has the worship service from "Easter" on it. It was given to me by a member of the production crew there. … Was there any preaching? Or just reading?” Jeremy responded: “I do agree with what has been said about the Easter service. It definitely was a show. And most of the people I've talked to about that service say the same thing….”
May 12, 2003 (Monday)
Madison Church of Christ, Incorporated: ONE YEAR LATER
Because Madison Church of Christ is now incorporated, we are required to have an annual membership meeting. This meeting will be on Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 6 p.m. in the Auditorium for the transaction of such business as may come before the meeting.
June 4, 2003
Madison Marcher (6/4/03) announces: “Broadway Resigns From Eldership.” Ken Rice, May Chairman of the Eldership, said, “It is with great regret that we have received the resignation of John Broadway. Here is his statement:”
After much prayer and deliberation over the past several weeks, I have decided to submit my resignation from the eldership of the Madison Church of Christ….
June 19, 2003
A comparative analysis of statistics from the 2003 publication of “Churches of Christ in the United States,” compiled by Mac Lynn. The counts, based on the reported numbers in 2002, consist of: (1) membership [assumedly “baptized” believers], (2) average worship attendance, (3) adherents [including children?]. Please notice MCC’s staggering data.
---------------------------------------- Members/Attendance/Adherents
Goodlettsville Church of Christ ---------- 490 ----- 685 ----- 770
Hendersonville Church of Christ --------- 1557 ---- 1323 ---- 2105
Woodmont Hills Church of Christ(*)------- 1660 ---- 2300 ---- 2500
Madison Church of Christ ---------------- 3142 ---- 1786 ---- 4730
Richland Hills Church of Christ, TX ----- 4450 ---- 3700 ---- 5240
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(*) Not listed as “Woodmont Hills Family of God” in the directory
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
July 23, 2003
Madison Marcher: “We are expanding the leadership of this great church.
Terry Ashley, Mark Street, Phil Coats
are being added to the eldership today. We are so pleased to see this number grow and expect to be able to service more effectively with these men in place.”
August 6, 2003
Madison Marcher: “The Madison Church of Christ has always had a heart for children and will continue to respond to, assist, and nurture children. We have our camp, youth activities, classes, and other programs for children … Morning Star Sanctuary…. So, we need to support all of these activities through our Sunday School Contribution. The Childcare program … however, will be closed. The State of Tennessee Children’s Services has altered the approach to childcare….”
August 13, 2003
Madison Marcher: “The shepherds are planning a new vision for Madison. They will be listening for awhile and then formulating what the Spirit leads them to envision for this church. Your prayers are earnestly solicited.”
September 3, 2003
Madison Marcher: “We want to encourage both 8:00 and 10:30 services. You will see the designation “traditional” and “contemporary” on our sign and in publication to inform the community of a choice. We hope that both times will see increase in attendance and involvement.” . . . “CALLING ALL SINGERS! The Worship and Music ministry is looking for additional singers. We are especially in need of male singers….” [also appeared in the next 2 weeks].
September 17, 2003
Madison Marcher: “Check your Saturday newspaper and find our new advertisement! . . . ||EVERY SUNDAY||--||Traditional Worship 8:00 am||--||Sunday School 9:30 am||--||Contemporary Worship 10:30 am||--||Evening Worship 6:00 pm|| . . . ||Pulpit Minister, Dr. C. Bruce White||--||Worship Minister, Keith Lancaster||”
September 28, 2003
The message on this Sunday was “Worthy of Double Honor.” It had been announced: “We are planning a very special day on September 28. We will be honoring our shepherds that day.” Former elders (J.D. Elliott, Bobby McElhiney, Charles Link, etc., with their wives) were honored first; current elders, with their wives, were also honored.
October 8, 2003
Madison Marcher: “Please pray for our shepherds. These men are going through some very trying meetings right now. The future of this congregation is weighing heavy on their hearts as they seek the Spirit’s guidance. They need your support and encouragement.”
December 15, 2003
A special e-mail has been received: “… I am troubled by the innovations, because they seem mostly to lean toward entertainment and behavior that I grew up associating with Pentecostal orgiastic ‘worship services.’ I quit going to Tulsa due to this. ...”
December 17, 2003
Madison Marcher: “Keith Lancaster will be taking a sabbatical from Madison for the next several months to spend more time with Acappella. We wish him well and look forward to his return!”
February 4, 2004
Madison Marcher: “A WORD FROM THE SHEPHERDS”
Shepherds’ Vision 2004: The shepherds have spent the last several months focusing on prayer and preparation of a course for the church family at Madison. … We will maintain a traditional worship style in our 8:00 service on Sunday morning and a contemporary style of worship at 10:30. We are interested in accommodating a worship style which connects the worshipper with the Creator … The elders have implemented a functional change in their roles as shepherds. An Elders Administrative Committee composed of … and Buck Dozier, in conjunction with the Business Manager, will handle day-to-day administrative details. The remaining elders will give their “attention to prayer and the ministry of the Word.” The goal of the elders is to “smell like sheep.” … The Deacons Administrative Committee….
We will be searching for a pulpit minister, as Dr. White enters partial retirement. He will continue to work on staff in other ministries. We look for a long relationship with him and Judy.
We will be looking for anew youth minister to lead our program of developing our young people into leaders for tomorrow.
February 18, 2004
“A Little Flavor of Rick Warren’s Saddleback Community Church-ism”—the following was advertised in the Madison Marcher:
27th Ladies Renewal (April 16th-17th, 2004) in Cadiz, KY—
Come share the Love of Our Lord and your sisters in Christ. ”The Purpose Driven Life”
We will use the book by Rick Warren as we study God’s Word
March 10, 2004
Interactive EASTER drama worship—Dr. White announces change in schedule: The drama presentation on “Easter Sunday” will no longer be an event in the “traditional” worship—it will be performed only during the “contemporary” worship.
March 23, 2004
Announcement on the Church Sign: WORSHIP WITH US EASTER APRIL 11, 8 & 10:30 A.M. … EASTER PASSION WORSHIP DRAMA AT 10:30 A.M.
Easter Worship Drama (Madison Marcher, March 17, 2004). “ . . . Easter Sunday [emphasis here and elsewhere, dc] is always a special time at Madison—but this year, April 11th is going to be unlike any worship experience we’ve ever shared together. During our 10:30 service [wonder why not at 8:00 am, dc], the story of Christ’s last hours—culminating in His Crucifixion and Resurrection—will be presented in the form of an interactive worship drama.
Everyone is encouraged to attend this special time of worship
April 5, 2004
FRONT PAGE re “EASTER SUNDAY PASSION DRAMA”: (MADISON MARCHER, March 31, 2004). “ . . . Experience much of the excitement next week as our Easter Sunday Passion Drama plays out at the 10:30 service [wonder why not at 8:00 am, dc] . . . We’ll join Jesus and His apostles in the upper room where we, as a congregation, will celebrate the Lord’s Supper. … This promises to be a very moving, powerful retelling of the Easter Story….”
Calendar: April 11 (Sunday—Easter) … Easter Worship Drama … 10:30 a.m.— ”The story of Christ’s last hours culminating in His Crucifixion and Resurrection will be presented in the form of an interactive worship drama.
April 12, 2004
Jim Morris, who began serving as an elder at the same time with Pat Burch and Marty Rothschild in September, 2002, made the following announcement in the Madison Marcher (Vol. 53, No. 13, April 7, 2004), “Statement to Madison Church:” This is not the time for me to serve this body as an elder.
The Preacher Potpourri column in the Madison Marcher has announced the following (4.21.04): “We are adding more elders. We want you to submit names to help in the process. Think through your selections, write his name or names on a piece of paper, and share it with one of our shepherds.”
June 9, 2004
Russ Kersten retires from eldership (Madison Marcher reports).
June 16, 2004
Ray Wilson retires from eldership (Madison Marcher reports).
There were 15 elders at the end of September 2001—10 of whom have resigned since. Is this report . . . troubling?
J.D. Elliott ----------- resigned 10/2001
Bobby McElhiney -------- resigned 10/2001
Joe Corley ------------- resigned 02/2002
Bill Bennett ----------- resigned 02/2002
Dale Bishop ------------ resigned 02/2002
Norman Slate ----------- resigned 02/2002
Charles Link ----------- resigned 06/2002 (… served since 1978)
John Broadway ---------- resigned 06/2003 (… served since 1998)
Ray Wilson ------------- resigned 06/2004 (… served since 1992)
Russ Kersten ----------- resigned 06/2004 (… served since 1992)
Ken Rice --------------- has served since ---1989
Buck Dozier ------------ has served since ---1996
Chris Gingles ---------- has served since ---1998
Howard Henderson ------- has served since ---1999
Tommy Hoppes ----------- has served since ---1999
Jim Morris ------------- resigned 04/2004 (… served since 09/2002)
Pat Burch -------------- has served since 09/2002
Marty Rothschild ------- has served since 09/2002
Terry Ashley ----------- has served since 07/2003
Phil Coats ------------- has served since 07/2003
Mark Street ------------ has served since 07/2003
July 7, 2004
“From the Madison Search Committee” (Madison Marcher)
“Several months ago … two groups appointed by the elders began praying and working toward the goals of hiring new pulpit and youth ministers. [Both committees included an elder liaison, other men as well as women in each.] … Pray that God … will make His will obvious, and that He will bless Tory’s efforts as he seeks out new opportunities [really?]. …
“As announced, our new pulpit minister (once hired) will enjoy a period of transition with Bruce and be fully in place by the end of the year. Our new youth minister will join our existing ministry team and assume Tory’s responsibilities—also by year end.” [cf. thread on Tory Tredway]
July 14, 2004
Madison Marcher’s special report that “Keith Lancaster returns from sabbatical.”
“The Madison family would like to welcome back Keith Lancaster as worship leader. Keith has been on sabbatical, producing two new albums for The Acappella Company. … In addition to working on the new albums, Keith attended the Pepperdine Lectureship in California and led worship at events in Texas…. ‘It is so great to be back with everyone at Madison,’ Keith said. ‘I really missed leading worship here.’
“Keith will teach a number of new songs in the upcoming weeks, primarily in Homebuilders class on Sunday mornings and Prayer & Praise class on Wednesday nights.
“Madison is very fortunate to have men who are able to lead worship and not just lead songs. …Lipscomb University now offers a worship ministry major, showing the growth of this trend among Churches of Christ.”
August 11, 2004
In “Devoted: Come to the Table” (Madison Marcher, August 11, 2004), it is explained that the “last quarter of 2004 will be devoted to communion and table fellowship” … “each family is encouraged to purchase a copy of Come to the Table, by John Mark Hicks….”
In “Come to the Table” (by Dawn Ferguson) …
Beginning September 26, Haddon will be sharing the premises behind Hicks’ book with his class as other teachers are also doing throughout the church. To help with the “revisioning” of the Lord’s Supper, … “Janelle is painting two images for the class that will be before us the entire six weeks we’ll be discussing communion,” said Haddon. “One will be the table. The other will be the altar. She’ll be depicting the things we think of when we think of altar – sacrifice, blood, etc. For the table, she’ll be painting Adam and Eve in the garden in the presence of God – before sin separated them from God.”
Haddon has asked Wells to paint during each class. “Kathy and I are still discussing and praying about what that painting will be,” said Haddon. “Hopefully, it will bring about the overall sense of hope and joy that Hicks believes is symbolized by the table of fellowship.” “… The living host is present at the table eating and drinking with his disciples. … The table on that first Easter, on that first Sunday, was a table of joy and celebration. There was no solemnity, sadness or burdened hearts.” ( Come to the Table, pg. 87)
[“Come to the Table” (“Revisioning” the Lord’s Supper) authored by John Mark Hicks is taught at Madison.]
August 18, 2004
“Madison Has Two New Elders” (Madison Marcher). See the June 16, 2004 list, plus:
John Hagan ------------- appointed August 2004
Jim Wilson ------------- appointed August 2004
October 6, 2004
In “Phil Barnes/Pulpit Minister,” From the Elders (Madison Marcher):
“Before his start date of November 1 [2004] , we would like to share some of our thoughts regarding Phil [Barnes]. … Phil Barnes is that man. We believe he is a God-lead choice whose strengths closely match the needs of Madison….”
October 27, 2004
In “Madison’s newest praise team joins active ministry” (Madison Marcher):
“The praise teams at Madison have been blessed … the Gold Team emerges as Madison’s newest praise team….”
November 17, 2004
The Madison Marcher declares “White Sock Sunday (a.k.a. ‘Sock It Away Campaign’) Success.” In addition to the “regular” contribution, the financial campaign contribution toward “Debt Retirement” was $304,664.67….
December 1, 2004
This month was highlighted by “Your Holiday Events” (Madison Marcher, 11.24.2004) with activities as: “Christmas of Hope” (12/2) benefiting the Morning Star Sanctuary; “Breakfast with Santa” (12/4, Sat.) in the Church Mall [$4 for adults, $2 for ages 3-11]; “A S’mores Christmas Party (12/4, Sat.)—“Parents Night Out—Kids Night of Fun”; “Singles’ Christmas Party” (12/2, Sat., 7-9 p.m., $15 per person at…)—‘Bring a wrapped Christmas ornament to play {Dirty Santa}’; “CHRISTMAS SINGING” (12/19, Sunday at 6 p.m., Bixler Chapel)—‘Start your holiday week with this inspiring service!’
The new pulpit minister, Phil Barnes, addresses his affinity for Christmas: “‘Merry Christmas’ has been replaced with ‘Happy Holidays.’ … It’s so easy to walk right past the manger with our arms full of gifts, isn’t it? … But … the one God sent to all of us wrapped in cloth and lying in a manger … Jesus Christ is Born!” [on December 25]
“What Is The Drama Ministry?” (cf. Madison Marcher, 12.1.2004). “The goal of the drama ministry is to give glory to God through the use of drama declaring, illustrating and clarifying Biblical truth [emph., d.c.]…” using I Corinthians 9:22 [becoming “all things to all men”]; I Peter 4:10-11 [“whatever gift”]; Eph. 6:19-20 [“make known the mystery of the gospel”].
Sounds like misuse of the scriptures. The other “minister(s)” would have been closer to the truth had they quoted one of their own chief ministering change agents:
“Drama works because we KNOW that it ISN'T TRUE. IF the word entertainment does mean to DIVERT one’s attention, to cause to be pleasurable, to cause to be interesting, then that is what we're here to do.”
January 16, 2005
Beginning this Sunday and the following, Phil Barnes, as a strong advocate of the Community Church/Change Movement, delivers sermons such as: “Is This All There Is to It?”; “Shattering the Shackles”; “Remove the Chains”; etc. These are favorite agenda among change movers. See “Timeline, Part VIII” for details.
January 26, 2005
Beginning this issue of the Madison Marcher, Keith Lancaster, the Musical Worship Leader, writes a series of articles on musical worship: (1) “Worship: It’s All About You, God!” [Notice how he “personally” addresses our heavenly Father—a semblance of “Hey, Man!”]; (2) “Worship: Our Great Heritage of Singing” [What heritage?]; (3) “Worship: God-Centered Singing” [What about Worship-Leader-Praise-Team-Centered Holy Entertainment at the Worship Center?]. See “Timeline, Part VIII” for details.
February 16, 2005
The “INTERACTIVE EASTER WORSHIP DRAMA” all over again!!! “This year on Saturday, March 26th at 7 p.m. and again on Easter Sunday during our 10:30 a.m. worship service, we will be celebrating the Easter Story together in an interactive worship drama … attend these special times of worship … when we will celebrate the Lord’s Supper … no … Canaan’s Land … during the Easter Morning worship service.” [This was brought up in “Timeline, Part VIII” for discussion … but unfortunately diverted into other irrelevant topics.]
March 17, 2005
A review of an article, “Phil Barnes/Pulpit Minister,” in the Madison Marcher (Vol. 53, No. 39, Oct. 6, 2004) reveals the obvious path that the church leaders are treading. “The elders composed a list of 15 … matching … characteristics necessary [for] … that man … to carry Madison forward….” What qualifications? “… Sensitive to traditional/contemporary services … Relevant to today’s environment … Team oriented—gets along well with others … People person … Motivator/promoter [of change, d.c.]….” One very keen observer noted the list as being “Bible-starved.”
March 27, 2005
The contemporary assembly at 10:30 a.m. was entertained with the performance of the “Interactive Easter Worship Drama,” but the 8:00 a.m. assembly was “deprived” of the Easter festival [thank you!!!] Note that some of the elders actually participated in the “Worship Drama.” Was “worship” interactive? There was virtually no congregational participation. All the intervening music during the drama was performed by the “worship leader” [in a “priestly” white robe] and his minstrels. However, the audience participated in the long applause at the conclusion of the worship drama.
April 10, 2005
There was the “combined worship service” at 10:00 on this “Madison Family Day.” The “worship leader,” and his Praise Team and handclappers were in their best behavior. The atmosphere was reverential; the Praise Team members had to hide their microphones; the other cheerleaders proved that the clapping hands have no vocal cords. Congregational singing was evident on this day.
Well, unfortunately, all of that was only transient. On the Sunday following, of course, the “charismatic” behavior of some and the concert-like environment did quickly return. (Please read the article in Part IX titled “The Sunday I Was at the ‘Christian’ Rock Concert.”)
_______________________________________
Quoting Phil Sanders:
“Entertainment settings should not be regarded as periods of worship. … There is no harm in clapping with appreciation for the entertainer, but clapping in worship seems to take the focus off of God and put it on the performer. To be caught up in the skill of a performer and to lose sight of God dilutes and cheapens worship. The rock star status accorded to some entertainers has little place next to the cross. In worship the focus must be on praising God, not the skills of men. Worship put on for show is clearly condemned in Scripture (Matt. 6:1-18; 23:5-12). … The recent blurrings of these distinctions [between entertainment and worship], coupled with the exposure to so many denominational worship services on television, services which feature professional performers, has created the confusion.”
_______________________________________
NOTE: Prior posts to this thread have been archived here. This is done to keep the loading time down and to ensure that all messages in the thread can be viewed. Thanks.
Madison’s “Worship” Attendance through April, 2005
May 9 2005, 12:35 AM
———————————————————————————————————————— QUOTED FROM AN E-MAIL: [[[[[… I am troubled by the innovations, because they seem mostly to lean toward entertainment and behavior that I grew up associating with Pentecostal orgiastic "worship services." I quit going to Tulsa due to this. ... ]]]]]
————————————————————————————————————————
———————————————————————————————————————————
Combined 8:00AM and Contemporary (10:30AM) Attendance
(recent statistics taken from the Marcher)
NOTE: All figures below include 300+ from the EXT dept.[?]
*@ .. Sunday School Drive on October 19, 2003
*$ .. “The Passion…” Movie Drive in February-March, 2004
@* .. Interactive Worship Drama (“Easter Sunday”)
@@ .. Baby Day Celebration
X* .. Great Day in May
&$ .. Memorial Day Service
%* .. Madison Family Day (Combined Assembly at 10:00)
(TR). Transition: White out; Barnes in
———————————————————————————————————————————
2001 __________ [NOTE: 2002 census shows MCC with—
_______________ 3142 members;
_______________ 1786 in worship attendance;
_______________ 4730 adherents
__________________________________________________________
2001 JANUARY 3000+ [?]______________________
2001 APR ______ ________2525____________2303
2001 MAY ______ 2498____2675____2403____2348
2001 JUN ______ 2355____2558____2543____2371
2001 JUL ______ 2531____2508____2428____2306____2386
2001 AUG ______ 2177____2375____2297____2161
2001 SEP ______ 2163____2335____2577____2096
2001 DEC ______ 2148____2008____2039____2134____1985
__________________________________________________________
2002 __________ [no stats available_____1786 reported avg.]
__________________________________________________________
2003 JUL ______ 1483____[7/20]
2003 AUG ______ 1702____1759____1726____1742____1732
2003 SEP ______ 1782____1722____1629____1498
2003 OCT ______ 1681__________*@2028____1643
2003 NOV ______ 1708____1664____1526____1637____1596
2003 DEC ______ 1554____1534____________1557
__________________________________________________________
2004 JAN ______ 1725____1712____1640____1715
2004 FEB ______ 1746____1606____1608____1647____1816*$
2004 MAR ______ 1819____1718____1738____1698
2004 APR ______ 1630____2697@*__1628____1733
2004 MAY ______ 1639@@__1748____1605____1713X*__1686&$
2004 JUN ______ 1648____1629____1660____1781
2004 JUL ______ 1691____1633____1797____1639
2004 AUG ______ 1678____1637____1773____1851____1771
2004 SEP ______ 1640____1728____1715____1661
2004 OCT (TR)__ 1687____1660____1630____1660____1617
2004 NOV (TR)__ 1695____1663____1833____1796
2004 DEC (TR)__ 1816____1761____________1491
__________________________________________________________
____ Membership Records for 2004 (Madison Marcher, 01.10.05)
_______________ 1633 Family Units
_______________ 3629 Attenders
__________________________________________________________
2005 JAN ______ 1699____1845____1819____1628____1823
2005 FEB ______ 1893____1844____1917____1953
2005 MAR ______ 1903____1983____1731____2416@*
2005 APR ______ 1736____1822%*__1750____1731@@
The jail count is not 325. It is 313. But it's close enough. LOL!!! My mistake, nonetheless, for not taking that into account. I believe you're correct. The weekly total includes 313 ... a constant value. The more appropriate reference to it is the Extension Dept.
Just in case the info is incorrect, please respond to this message. We'll make the correction.
Donnie
Charlie (no login) 66.199.28.132
Re: Jail
May 11 2005, 11:12 AM
So Donnie
What's the scoop from the rafters? As I am assuming you are still scoping out the flaws according to what you believe from way up top. I haven't been to Madison since the fall, 2004 but still visit because it is home to me and has great people who I am honored to call my brothers and sisters in the Lord. I hear there is a seminar going on this week. Have you been a part of that? JW, Charlie
(no login) 63.84.81.3
MARCHER
May 11 2005, 11:57 AM
Charlie, if you have any influence at Madison perhaps you could suggest a web designer who can post HTML to be read online or ACROBAT stuff which is not so long it plugs up the computer.
Could you tell us who is replacing Jesus this seminar?
Ken
Donnie Cruz (no login) 65.106.236.205
Re: Re: Jail
May 13 2005, 3:48 PM
Is this Charlie … as in “Prince Charles”?
What specific flaws are you speaking of? And flaws by whom? As I have said before, I don’t deal with matters and issues that relate to specific individuals who are part of the body that generally responds to what leaders or those who assume leadership roles want the “followers” to do. In other words, all the activities going on—entertainment-related or otherwise—are the responsibility of the leaders or self-acclaimed leaders [… and it is not difficult to name a few of them].
Now, speaking of leaders … by his/her definition of what the role entails—which is supposedly “to lead the followers into God’s holy presence”—when the “worship leader” MISLEADS, then, he/she is responsible for it. The same is also true into what UNTRUTHS (compromised truths when seeking approval) the man/woman in the pulpit delivers.
BTW, Charlie, I am also honored to call many members at Madison as my brothers and sisters in the Lord. That’s why I still attend there. Regarding seminars, I lack interest in them. I can learn much on my own and at my own time.
When are you visiting Madison again?
Donnie
(no login) 66.169.126.183
Love Feast
May 16 2005, 12:17 AM
Contemporary Worship Choreography—Made for TV or the “Audience of One”?
Donnie, I have read this post. I have several questions if you have time to answer them. I will only ask one for the time being, I am still watching the Dallas Maverick's game.
What is a "love feast?"
In Christian Love,
Jimmy
(no login) 65.1.111.69
Re: Love Feast
May 17 2005, 1:41 AM
Jimmy,
Sorry about the delay of this response.
I’m somewhat tempted to say that “love feast” at Madison must be a unique event, since it appears that you, among many others as well, have not heard of it. Whatever it is, if practiced in other congregations, would be something commonly done … correct?
I’m not sure about the history of it. I began attending the second assembly at 10:00 [I think that was the time then] in 1986 or 1987. Of course, then, there was no division between “traditional” and “contemporary.” Both assemblies used exactly the same worship guide. Both assemblies were the same except for the schedule (at either 8:00 or 10:00) that the attendee preferred. There was no human-designated “Worship Leader” to charismatically bring the leader’s followers into “God’s holy presence.” There was no Praise Team to perform its music and to facilitate the congregational singing—the congregation very capably did it all on its own without the domineering Praise Team. The song starter, Nick Boone, did his simple task and allowed the congregation to sing “in one accord” without the musicians’ intervention. There were no cheerleaders and rhythmic hand clappers. The overall atmosphere as the saints gathered was reverential. OK … back to the “love feast” history. Personally, as a late bird, I preferred going to the 9:00 Bible study and the 10:00 assembly—which was “traditional” by the standards of today’s contemporaries. This means that the long-time, original 10:00 assembly was eventually hijacked … but not until the upheaval during 2001.
I believe that by the late 80’s when I began attending Madison, I would assume that the love feast had already been an ongoing event during the Ira North era, perhaps even earlier. Even through the 90’s, I really didn’t think any more of it than just a way that members were greeting and shaking hands with each other … for up to about a couple of minutes. The only oddity I felt was that, unlike Madison, many congregations would get this event out of the way either before the first or after the last song or prayer. But not at Madison—it was somewhere in the middle of the “worship” period.
It is still this way in this 21st century. Just imagine all the noise from that many members talking to each other that would last for a good two-minute period … like a bunch of giant bees buzzing around loud speakers. But that’s OK within itself. Can you imagine if that were a two-minute saluting one another with a “holy kiss”?
The problem I have/had with the event is the time in the assembly during which it is “programmed” to occur. As you know, in the last few years, there has been an attempt among change agents to do something about the way “members of the body of Christ” [which includes all denominations, according to these agents of change] partake of the Communion, i.e., that the Lord’s Supper is more than just about the suffering and death of our Savior on the cross. To them it is supposed to include the celebration of “the resurrection” of Christ [and why not His ascension as well?]. To them it is inclusive of members of all religious faiths—they’re all members of the “body of Christ.” To them the communion or “fellowship” of all “these brethren” is equivalent in significance to the partaking of the bread and the cup. This is the part where I’m having trouble with—making the love feast a continuation or part of the Lord’s Supper by doing this practice IMMEDIATELY before or after the Lord’s Supper. Again, can you imagine all that salutatory noise you hear within seconds after partaking of the fruit of the vine? But I’ll give credit to the “worship committee”—it has made a “conscious effort” to program the “love feast” a few songs apart from the commemorating the Lord’s crucifixion. It may be temporary, but it’s an improvement.
Now, Jimmy, let me caution that the above is my version of the “love feast” at Madison. Perhaps, you may suggest that it be done before or after the assembly period. It is really a distraction to actually set aside a two-minute period somewhere in the middle of the “worship” period for members to stand up and do this noisy activity.
Thanks for asking a difficult question.
Donnie
(no login) 68.154.166.130
A Special "M.C.C., Incorporated" Announcement
May 23 2005, 4:20 AM
Taken from the "worship guide" dated May 15, 2005--is also in the Madison Marcher (May 18, 2005). Can someone help me research as to when churches in Jerusalem, Antioch, Rome, Ephesus, Galatia, Corinth, etc., were incorporated? Thanks!
____________________________________
NOTICE TO ALL MADISON CHURCH OF CHRIST MEMBERS:
We will have our annual corporation meeting on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 6 p.m. in the Main Auditorium. Buck Dozier will be conducting the meeting
(no login) 66.169.126.183
The early Christians held all things in common
May 23 2005, 9:43 AM
Can't find any first or second century Churches incorporating. No individual would claim ownership of the Church!
Incorporating is one of the best ways a business owner can protect his or her personal assets.
Who owns the personal assets at Madison?
Don't tell me the members own it. If the members own it there would have been no reason to incorporate.
In Christian Love,
Jimmy
(no login) 63.84.81.97
MadInc
May 23 2005, 2:12 PM
I have the notes from a Presbyterian church which switched saddles from the "ministers" to the widows and orphans.
The plan is explicit: unfortunately a watching eye caught "partners" right in the middle of the GREAT LEAP FORWARD with old Mousey Dung 5 year plan.
You expand facilities and get in a good financial position. You NEED to change the name and incorporate.
Then you LEAP into the Saddleback and ride away with the property. However, you have to incorporate and put YOUR brand on rear end hide
Just make sense--Old Chineze Proverb:
Big Chang partner with Hung Lo collect many silkworms.
Big Chang say "trust me Hung Lo and we have big worm ranch.
"Hung Lo invest widow's old age rice funds."
Big Chang say: "give widow's rice to buy silk worms--
...."when old widow have big time rice fund."
But, Big Chang have big Yen for Hung Lo's silk worms.
Big chang paint silkworms with own brand.
Hung Lo go to Prefecture Rustling Wormboys.
Big Juan Wang sing new song:
"no luk, no luk, yuk, yuk, yuk:
silkworms now Big Chang's.
can't steal them back
can't steal them back.
no luk, no luk, yuk, yuk, yuk."
Find proverb in old Moon Cake Li Chang promise is ancient Fortune Cookie. Li Chang say he also have ebay sale on "rice wine powered T.V. from Ming dynasty." Maybe update my old kerosene T.V.? Keep seeing old Marco Polo travel story,
(no login) 65.1.117.101
What “Bible” Classes Men and Women Teach at Madison
May 31 2005, 4:51 AM
There is an interesting announcement in the Marcher concerning “New Adult Sunday School Classes Beginning in June.”
LifeBuilders is the new name for HomeBuilders. I wonder what Tom Haddon is now teaching … does anyone know? As you know, the Homebuilders class to this day has remained popular among the denominational world. Just do an online search. Some Haddonfield United Methodist Church has it. Visit the Shiloh Hills Baptist Church, it has this class. Union Avenue Christian Church … Crossroads Community Church … First Presbyterian Church of Greensboro … even certain copycat churches of Christ have this class—which targets couples with young children, young married couples, baby boomers. Perhaps, LifeBuilders is good for a change. Perhaps, someone can provide information as to what textbooks in psychology are used. We know that this group or partners teach this class: — Jason Patterson and Sam Perry — Terry & Susie Ashley — Rob Wells and Leanne Shelby — Frank Scott — Madison’s Praise Team. [This is not a misprint: yes, Madison’s Praise Team will be teaching this class. Go figure what this team will be teaching the “lifebuilders”—the backbone or future leaders of the church!]
Single Mothers Class—Kimberly Tucker and Sue Binkley will be teaching. Well, normally a class would specify which book in the Bible is being studied. The announcement does not say. So, what textbook will be used in this class?
Serving Singles—begins June 12th with John Hagan and Jim Wilson [elders] teaching. What is the textbook?
Of course, there are continuing classes from the previous term: “Seekers Class,” “Seeking-Serving-Sisters,” etc.
____________________________________
Here’s one for you, my friend Chuck Sonn. Remember when I became curious as to when Phil Barnes might give lessons on God’s Grace and Christian-Living-Made-Easy a break and start preaching on Christians being true servants of the Lord, as well as on Christian living demanding responsibility and sacrifice, producing and maintaining good works, running “the race with patience”?
Chuck, did you make that suggestion to Mr. Phil? At any rate, Phil did finally quote Hebrews 12:1-3. I’m sure the passage displayed on the screen was taken from the elder-approved and Madison’s official Bible version—the NIV. I would like to quote from the KJV:
“[1] Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, [2] Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God. [3] For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds.”
I was somewhat disappointed at the outset that he misquoted Acts 2:38 by mentioning baptism and the receiving of the Holy Spirit, rather than the “gift OF the Holy Spirit.” His main points were as follows: (1) being encouraged by the saints who were before us—citing Jacob, Moses, Rahab; (2) that struggling with disobedience makes us stronger; (3) that we always have a choice in the way we behave.
Phil failed to show me that God’s grace (His part) and man’s obedience and life of service and works of righteousness are not inimical to each other. Really, his message would have been more impacting had he elaborated on the biblical teaching that a Christian can fall from grace (Heb. 6:6; Gal. 5:4); … is to “take heed lest he fall” (I Cor. 10:12); to take heed unto the doctrine (I Tim. 4:16); that his faith without works is dead (James 2); to “work out your own salvation with fear and trembling” (Phil. 2:12); to be “faithful unto death” in order to “receive the crown of life” (Rev. 2:10; plus many, many more passages.
____________________________________
So, Musical Worship Leader Keith was not well enough but just watched Kevin perform his task?
____________________________________
Donnie
(no login) 66.169.126.183
Ministries
June 6 2005, 12:32 PM
Ministry of the Church of Christ
“For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungered, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. Matthew 25:35-40
Ministries of Madison as taken from their Web Site
Family Life --- Counseling --- Student --- Children
Domestic Violence Program --- Worship & Media Center --- Recreation ---Singles
In Christian Love,
Jimmy
(no login) 68.19.246.247
PERFORMANCE—the Other God of the Worship & Media Center
June 8 2005, 5:22 AM
The title above would make a great topic or separate thread for discussion—to be pursued perhaps in the near future. The projector-screen dependency syndrome, with its great benefits (i.e., less the syndrome), has become a spiritual disorder of some sort. The simple use of the hymnbook has been viewed with derision and antiquity by those enamored with the Contemporary Christian Music Movement ideology and the other god it serves. Let’s keep that thought when we discuss Madison’s “worship and media center” ministry later on. But let’s take a quick peek at the “PRAISE TEAM & LEADER DEVELOPMENT” for which Kay Nickell is responsible:
Plan double praise team makeup, rehearsal schedules, music needs.
Plan and implement praise team events, including banquet, training workshops and fellowship events.
Orient new praise team members.
Plan training times for additional worship leaders.
Help facilitate teen praise team launch and children’s chorus.
What have I said about rehearsed worship including the programmed joy of rhythmic handclapping and the unintelligible human sound effects? Is there a “cool” teen praise team development in progress? I wouldn’t be surprised.
If you think performance is not the other god of the “worship ministry,” think again.
Donnie
(no login) 65.1.108.66
“Shame on you that have accepted the changes without question.” (by PPB)
June 11 2005, 9:48 PM
The following post is taken from ConcernedMembers’ Richland Hills Forum—Name of Thread: “Why don’t you spend all this effort on something else” (by Susan French)—
We would like to re-post PPB’s article that was submitted to the above forum on June 10 2005, 10:48 PM (since it mentions Madison and appropriately so):
_____________________________________
The saddest part about all of this change is that Satan is winning.
I still cannot understand why grown, intelligent adults can't see what is happening. How they are now having no boundaries, no true beliefs, no one path, etc. They have accepted the false premise of Love, Love, Love.
How can those of you who are for Madison and this type of indoctrination not get what is going on? Are you blind or are you scared to see what is so clearly in front of you? That the Church is being taken over by Satan in the name of the Lord should be apparent to anyone who really loves and believes in God. But instead, you condemn those who have the guts to shout out a warning.
For shame on you that have accepted the changes without question. You that feel you have received God's love without much responsibility ... you that fail to read ALL of the Bible and only apply portions. You that have made Church a social occasion and not the somber, serious event it is supposed to be.
Unfortunately, much of this change we should place on our own shoulders. We spent too much time being blameless and perfect Christians and not sharing both our sins and our sufferings with each other. Like the prior poster said, when one sins, stops the sin and asks for forgiveness—the sin is over. In God's eyes and ours! We became overly judgmental and had a "better than you" attitude that allowed this evil into our church. We must now take a stand and stop it. We pretend that our lives are perfect and that we never sin. But we do ... daily! Let's admit it and support each other. Let's help each other thru these times and hopefully, it will prevent others from going down the same path. Only one was perfect.
To those of you who have fallen for the false teachings (and yes, the Bible CLEARLY is against Madison's teachings if you are willing to read ALL of it), I beg you to give up your hardened hearts and realize that being a Christian is about more than just loving the Lord and going around proclaiming your Christianity.
To those of you at Madison, ask yourself why Jesus stated the following:
"The path is narrow and few there are that will find it."
"Not everyone who says 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven."
I dare any of you to read the writings of the early Christians and how they felt about such changes. These are the same men who actually learned at the feet of Paul, Peter, John and the other Apostles. These are the elders of the Churches that Jesus discusses and did not find fault with—just some of the members. The change to the early Church began the same way as the changes are today. Satan seems to do things the same way as long as they work so easily for him.
_____________________________________
John (no login) 167.219.0.144
Nothing happening?
June 21 2005, 4:44 PM
Donnie, you haven't updated in several weeks.
have you found another fellowship or has Madison returned to the old paths?
(no login) 68.19.238.142
“Things” are still happening … subtly.
June 23 2005, 5:56 AM
Hello, John,
Has Madisonreturned to “the old paths”? Pardon me for parsing this very important question.
In Jeremiah 6, where it begins with “O ye children of Benjamin,” [it is ironic that] we find the following words and expressions: “shepherds with their flocks” … “be thou instructed, O Jerusalem, lest my soul depart from thee” [v.8] … “I give warning that they may hear” … “saying peace, peace, when there is no peace” … “the word of the LORD is unto them a reproach; they have no delight in it” [v.10] … etc.
[15] Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the LORD. [16] Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. [17] Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken. [18] Therefore hear, ye nations, and know, O congregation, what is among them. [19] Hear, O earth: behold, I will bring evil upon this people, even the fruit of their thoughts, because they have not hearkened unto my words, nor to my law, but rejected it. [20] To what purpose cometh there to me incense from Sheba, and the sweet cane from a far country? your burnt offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices sweet unto me.
John, we need to direct your question to the “shepherds of the flock” and the other leaders—the “worship” speaker (Phil Barnes), the “Worship Leader” (Keith Lancaster), the “Youth Ministers” (Shana Curtis and Keith Hall).
Sermons are all about relationships, feeling good about self, lessons in psychology and individual differences—and less or no more about admonitions, warnings, obedience to God’s direct commands, producing “works of righteousness” or “working out your salvation with fear and trembling” or “maintaining good works.” Great performance is the other god of the “Worship Leader” during the “worship service.”
Overall, charismatic [in today’s definition] feel-good “praise” music is the main objective in the assembly. The “Worship Leader” with his “Praise Team” has increasingly become the mediator between the congregation and God.
It’s constantly being brought up that the congregation is growing … growing … growing. Of course, numerical growth is the MAIN objective of the CGM (Church Growth Movement) or Rick Warren’s “Purpose Driven Church” cult. And I wouldn’t be surprised that by following Rick’s scheme, what is now the MCC, Inc. (church incorporation, BTW, is a significant step in the methodology), the congregation just might achieve that goal. For now, the stats data, according to what’s being reported weekly in the Marcher, reveals little or no significant increase in attendance since the upheaval in 2001. I believe the record keeping is accurate, but the impression given is inaccurate. The leadership’s perception is that—oh, yes, we see many, many new faces in attendance. Sadly, though, the perception is NOT there [really think about this … no pun intended] in regard to those missing. The true perception is this—new members are replacing those that are still leaving.
I haven’t posted the more detailed tasks of the “Worship Ministry.” I may have briefly mentioned earlier something about the children’s chorus. Well, the lovely children are now trained early to perform. This past Sunday before the children left the auditorium for their own “Children’s Worship,” the children’s chorus rendered a song that was directed by Eric Bright.
“Returned to” did you say? “Returned to” implies “returned from,” doesn’t it? Well, again, the leadership knows the answer to both “returned from what” and “returned to what.”
John, I’m not trying to find another fellowship at this time. Perhaps, I really don’t need to. I’m comfortable with the fellowship I have with my brothers and sisters in the Lord at Madison. The members are not to be faulted.
Well, thanks for helping me update this thread.
Donnie
Concerned in Kentucky (no login) 68.210.167.203
Re: “Things” are still happening … subtly.
June 27 2005, 11:11 AM
It saddens me to hear you write of these things at Madison. You mention a "Youth Minster" that appears to be a woman. I believe her name was Shana? Is this really true? The other "Youth Minister" was a fellow named Hall. Is he a part of leading the young people at Madison astray? I am saddened by all of this. What would Ira North think?
Thank you for the reply. I sincerely appreciate your prompt response. I followed that link, but it only points to one picture...that of the woman "Youth Minister." Surely she is not the only person that Madison has working with the youth. What about the young men? Do they approve of a woman teaching them?
Is the other fellow you mentioned (I believe his name was Hall) involved with this as well? Does he work with the young men, or have any role in all of this? Is he submitting to the authority of the woman "Youth Minister"? All of this is very confusing. I look forward to as much information as you can provide.
B (no login) 192.133.129.3
Re: To concerned in Kentucky:
June 28 2005, 10:26 AM
If I understand it correctly, there is a female youth minister for the girls and a male for the guys. Given the troubles faced by teenage girls today, this is a pretty wise move if your church can afford it.
(no login) 70.149.154.197
The Female Youth Minister
June 29 2005, 3:26 AM
B:
If I understand you correctly, are troubles not faced by teenage boys today? Are the boys separated from the girls when they travel to a youth camp? Are the boys separated from the girls when they make music, sing their silly singy-clappy-clappy songs?
(no login) 70.149.154.197
Welcome, Concerned!
June 29 2005, 3:24 AM
You’re correct about the only picture. I had noticed the same thing when I provided the link. I guess it served my intention to make you wonder and ask about the missing picture of the other “Youth Minister”—the man. [My speculation is that the new YM guy’s picture is not ready for the church’s site webmaster to put on that same page.]
Just curious here—why is “Youth Minister” in quotes? Uh-oh … you’re learning from me rather quickly. Those other thingies called “Worship Leader” … “Praise Team” … “Worship and Media Center Ministry” … “Shepherds” [note: “shepherds” is OK and scriptural; but the change agents prefer to refer to “loving shepherds” over “mean elders”—just like “praise team” instead of the “denominational church choir,” etc.]. Since when did “it” become “Worship Ministry”? I think this “pastor” thingy has already started—i.e., reference to the sermon delivery guy [or gal, perhaps, in the near future] as the “pastor.” But one main point to consider is that, just like businesses, MCC, Inc. (that means “incorporated”—right?) must be staffed. Personnel, being paid or not paid, is really none of my business. But I wonder what the Lord thinks of the collection for the poor and needy saints going towards the “worship ministry” [huh?] and the “Worship Leader,” et al.
Oops … back to your questions. Keith Hall is the male “Youth Minister”—and is Tory Tredway’s replacement. BTW, many people have wondered to this day how and why Tory lost his job. [Hush, Tory wasn’t the singy-clappy charismatic kind of guy. He was young but he did not meet the “contemporary” standards.] In case you didn’t know, there are a few posts in the thread about “Tory Tredway.” Check the Page 1 Index for this thread last-dated March 4, 2005.
Concerned, I just re-read your second paragraph. You certainly are full of … um … intelligent and logical questions. Are you really surprised [and disappointed and sad] that these things are happening at Madison? Speaking of roles, I myself wonder sometimes as to how much longer it’ll be before the congregation will have deaconesses. Rick Atchley’s Richland Hills in Texas does. Rubel Shelly’s Woodmont Hills Family of God in Nashville is not far behind. Max Lucado’s Oak Hills [Community] Church is enjoying musical instruments in one of its “worship” periods.
I think in one of my posts above I listed a few of Madison’s adult Sunday classes that have both men and women teachers. The Praise Team that co-leads with “Worship Leader” Keith Lancaster has the same number of women as men leading in “worship.” Of course, the change agents will argue that women lead other women in singing the soprano and alto parts. Doesn’t that make one wonder how many men sing soprano with their women leaders? Or, is it those men’s turn to “keep silent in the church” this time? This reminds me of the congregational singing situation in Madison’s “contemporary” assembly which, by the way, is overpowered by Keith’s Praise Team. Maybe I should invite you to visit Madison and see and hear Keith and his musicians perform. I have the gut feeling that members of Keith’s music team expect our Father in heaven to enjoy their musical concert like humans do.
I agree with you, Concerned. It is all confusing. Thanks for asking.
Donnie
P.S.: Would you be interested in reading my “testimony” in the next day or two regarding my latest charismatic experience? It happened this past Sunday. I’ll probably post part of on Thursday and the rest of it afterwards. We’ll just see.
B (no login) 192.133.129.3
Re: Welcome, Concerned!
June 29 2005, 9:15 AM
No, Donnie. Teenage boys have problems too. However, there are problems that are unique to teenage girls, and they are more likely to share them with a woman.
(no login) 70.146.152.244
Re: The Female Youth Minister
July 3 2005, 12:16 AM
B,
I've studied a course in psychology and individual differences. Also, what you have stated is common knowledge.
So, let me re-state my questions: Are the boys separated from the girls when they travel to a youth camp? Are the boys separated from the girls when they make music, sing their silly singy-clappy-clappy songs?
In fact, let me ask you another question: When boys and girls [or should I say young men and young women Christians] are together as they do their "praise" thingy by singing some silly singy-clappy-clappy "praise" music, would you have no objection to the female youth minister leading the group that also includes the young Christian men?
Donnie
B (no login) 65.64.25.105
Re: The Female Youth Minister
July 3 2005, 11:20 PM
Yes, Donnie, I would object to that. I would also object to both of them leading songs together.
(no login) 68.19.233.238
Female Youth Minister and “Worship Leader”
July 4 2005, 4:58 PM
Thanks, B, for qualifying your previous statement. I think we are clear on this one. If the "older" lady does not go beyond counseling the "younger" women, I have no objection to that, although I believe that this should be voluntary on her part. If she seeks employment in the church simply for this purpose and expects to be compensated for it, that no longer is a type of service in the sense that one is willing to be a servant of the Lord in that capacity—freely a sacrifice or service in the vineyard of the Lord. A social worker should seek employment [i.e., with salary] somewhere else—not in the church.
Let me point out, though, that a “female counselor” [reason why the “official” title of “Youth Minister” designated to a female is misleading] who is being compensated for “counseling” is no worse than the “WORSHIP LEADER” being a fulltime employee of the congregation, even if it is “incorporated” like a company, who does nothing else but WAG his arms and hands for a few hours during the entire week. That is purely MISHANDLING OF THE SAINTS’ collection” intended to assist the needy. As in the case of Madison, there are many very qualified, talented men who can take turns and also do the wagging voluntarily—without wasting the saints’ collection for someone who already has his own business in the name of “religion.” Have you heard of “A Cappella dot Org” … or something like that?
Donnie
(no login) 70.146.150.50
Flavoring the Wed. Night’s “Prayer & Praise Service” Choreography
July 13 2005, 4:12 AM
———————————————————————————————————————— QUOTED FROM AN E-MAIL: [[[[[… I am troubled by the innovations, because they seem mostly to lean toward entertainment and behavior that I grew up associating with Pentecostal orgiastic "worship services." I quit going to Tulsa due to this. ... ]]]]]
————————————————————————————————————————
DATE (2004) ……… P&P
WHO
PRO- JECTION
FLOW
VIDEO
AUDIO
TIME
You Are the Song That I Sing
Key Clapmaster
seated
You’re the One You’re the Only One
seated
He Has Made Me Glad
standing
Light the Fire
standing
I Exalt Thee
standing
Prayer
Jerry Morgan
seated
Reading John 13:34; I John 3:16-18
Mark Steers
not projected
seated
Arms of Love
seated
We Will Stand
Key and Kev
conversation: what does it mean to be a “visitor-friendly church”?
Key and Hal B
video operator needs cues for transitions to conver- sations
1st Video Segment (Opener)
conversation – what others think
Key and Hal B
2nd Video Segment (negative opinions)
conversation
Key and Hal B
3rd Video Segment (worship & evangelism)
conversation
Key and Hal B
4th video segment – how we treat each other
discuss conclusions from videos
Key and Hal B
Invitation
Hal Barns
Greatest Commands
Kev Dunback
Shepherd’s Prayer
Buck Frazier
Hallowed Be Thy Name
Key and Kev
(no login) 68.19.232.114
Contemporary Worship Choreography—Made for TV or “the Audience of One”?
July 21 2005, 5:46 AM
The Contemporary Christian Music Movement has popularized the expression “the audience of One” in reference to God to whom “corporate worship” is supposedly being directed. It is a defensive argument for the popular notion that a change in “worship style” should not be an issue in a changing society. Is “worship style” the real issue? Or is “worship content” the real issue? I know … I know that the list of questions related to the subject of “worship” is endless.
The document below will reveal to the open-minded reader a typical setting of activities that occur in the “contemporary worship service” at Madison. So, what has become of the simplicity of the “gathering of the saints” that the New Testament speaks of?
Please review the information below very carefully. (“Names have been changed to protect the innocent.”) What does God care about “CCBCEnding – AABABA” or “VCVCVending” or the “prayer leaders and Hal walk[ing] up to stage together” or the “trio seated” at a certain time? What does God care about the elite Praise Team and the use of the microphones so the One can hear the performing team members better and be glorified better than without their voices magnified?
Is choreographed worship “in spirit and in truth”? What does “worship in spirit and in truth” mean? When is it a performance? Is it “holy entertainment”?
DATE (2005) ……… SECOND SERVICE
WHO
PROJECTION NOTES
FLOW NOTES
Focus
Hal Barns
prayer leaders and Hal walk up to stage together
Prayer
Gregory Drew,
Michael Hurt,
Jason Petersen
3 prayer leaders, 3 themes: praise, thanksgiving including our freedom in X; seeking God’s guidance
Lord We Come Before Thee Now #419
Key Clapmaster
v1, v2, ooh a verse while Steve prays, then last verse (modulate the last verse?)
all singers and prayer leaders go up to the front at the same time
There is Power in the Blood #667
first and last – repeat chorus – direct into next song
standing (song is there is power in the blood: “free” goes with his lesson
Give Thanks to the Lord n.b.#2
CCBCEnding-AABABA
Light the Fire notebook #171
repeat chorus (normal)
Leaning on the Everlasting Arms #394
1st & last verse / chorus / repeat chorus
Greatest Commands
no repeats A – B – T – S
seated (trio seated)
Video
testimony about the importance and the desire for fellowship with the church family; perhaps from many people (one line from each) “I can’t make it w/o the fellowship of my brothers and sisters…Can’t wait to be with the church family…etc.)
Love Feast
Blessed Be the Lord God Almighty notebook #10
VCC
standing
Shout to the Lord n.b. #11
normal
I Need You More n.b. #27
normal
If You Miss Me n.b. #68
normal
Clap Your Hands n.b. #160
normal
Hymn Background
Tom Saddleback
seated
Ten Thousand Angels #621
all verses/one chorus
I Can Only Imagine notebook #104
Communion
Wade Huddles
Bread “Come to the Table” V one Chorus; Cup: Chorus
Contribution
Carroll Champus
One Thing I Ask n.b. #101
VCVCVending
The River Is Here n.b. #174
new big ending
dismiss children
Message: “Defeating the Enemies of Change”
Hal Barns
There’s a Fountain Free #655
song is “There’s a Fountain Free”
Shepherd’s Blessing
Terry Ashford
(dealing with freedom in Christ), trio come back to stage
My Life Is in You notebook #46
one bass, only sing one verse (half as long as normally sing) – half
sing out: Jesus Will Fix It
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.126.140
RE: Contemporary Worship Choreography—Made for TV or “the Audience of One”?
July 21 2005, 2:15 PM
When I see worship choreography such as this written out with all kinds of cues and directions, I am reminded of the liturgy in the Roman Catholic Church and its branches, which is completely written out. All the priest needs to do is read it verbatim if he hasn't already memorized it. Scripture verses are planned for each particular Sunday in the liturgical year, week in and week out, as are the "prayers." Virtually nothing is spontaneous, all done by rote.
In contrast, when I was organist for a Baptist church, there was a printed "order of worship," which listed everything that was supposed to transpire during the service, including the hymns. But that church had a pastor who loved to be "spontaneous" by deviating from the order. He deleted hymns and added hymns on the spur of the moment without ever telling the church musicians in advance, so we often were caught off guard. Sometimes the Minister of Music would be ready to direct the choir in their next number, only to be interrupted by the pastor jumping up to lead the congregation personally in a "spontaneous" hymn that he had just thought of. Being "spontaneous" created nothing but chaos when there were instrumentalists and other performers/entertainers involved.
So on the one hand, we have Churches of Christ who are imitating the Catholics or the Protestant denominations with their "choreographed worship/order of worship," and on the other hand we have Protestant denominations that defeat a "choreographed worship/order of worship" through the chaos of spontaneity.
What's the solution? If a church would be truly spontaneous, get rid of the instrumentalists and those who vocally imitate the sound of instruments. Get rid of any choreographed praise teams, soloists, choirs, and those who would otherwise seek the accolades of men through their "holy" performances. Thus the chaos is removed, and worship is simple and spontaneous.
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.197.193
Re: Contemporary Worship Choreography—Made for TV or “the Audience of One”?
July 21 2005, 11:03 PM
Wow, Donnie,
Can you reveal where you got these documents? Perhaps from an anonymous scource? You know what Dr. Crump says about anonymous on another thread.
Or, perhaps you just made all this up.
Annie Mouse
(no login) 65.1.109.143
Message from a "former" worship leader
July 22 2005, 12:44 AM
Wow, Ms. Mouse,
Here are some interesting observations:
Hmmm! By “where” … do you mean which church or congregation? It is certainly not from one of the seven churches in Asia “revealed” in the book of Revelation—not from Ephesus, Smyrna [Tennessee], Pergamos, Thyatira, Sardis [Alabama], Philadelphia [PA], Laodicea.
If you’re not afraid to reveal yourself, I’ll consider letting you know if I received them by e-mail, by priority/express mail or by regular mail or if they were specially delivered or handed to me.
I’m trying to think really hard. If I made up the documents, would I be recognized as a creative producer? Would the documents be more credible or less? I now wonder what I really meant when I said that the names were changed “to protect the innocent.”
Speaking of another thread, “Contemporary Worship Choreography—Made for TV or ‘the Audience of One’? ” should be a good one to check out. In fact, both documents were initially posted in that thread. The last post in this thread is dated May 29, 2005 at 6:46 a.m.
I have just read that last post from that thread. Guess what, Annie? I want to thank you for your post above. I was going to do a follow-up article. But why bother? I am reposting that last post, plus the e-mail I got from a FORMER “Worship Leader,” Dan Lucarini. Madison’s “Worship Leader,” Keith Lancaster (Church of Christ, I think), could use some advice from Dan Lucarini, a FORMER “Worship Leader” (Baptist).
___________________________
Message from a "former" worship leader
May 29 2005 at 6:46 AM
I must share this special message from someone who is highly knowledgeable about the CCM Movement. In fact, he has written a book published by Evangelical Press, “Why I Left the Contemporary Christian Music Movement,” now on its 13th printing. I have been granted permission to post this personally treasured e-mail from Dan Lucarini:
________________________________
-----Original Message----- From: Dan Lucarini [danlucarini@msn.com] Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 7:29 PM To: donniecruz@msn.com Subject: Contemporary Worship Choreography-Made for TV or "the Audience of One"?
Hey Donnie,
I see you are still stirring up the 'worship' hornet nest! So am I. As a former worship leader, I knew exactly what the order of service you printed means. I chuckled at the 'VCC' (verse-chorus-repeat chorus). At the same time, seeing it again made me realize afresh how trite and manipulative is the entire exercise of 'planning worship'.
There's an interesting book out called Worship: The Simple Mystery by Dan McGowan (friend of mine). It should have been titled 'confessions of a current worship leader'. Dan recounts the time a professional worship consultant came to his Evang Pres church and taught the worship team how to fake the sincerity. He also laments the professionalism that has taken over Sunday mornings.
Our contemporary worship friends are caught in a dilemma of their own making. On one hand they tell us we have to abandon the old, dead, lifeless forms of worship where people do the same thing over and over again, and there is no spontaneity allowed. On the other hand, these same people rigorously program their own worship services with lots of little manipulative entertainment tricks like those in your article.
Spontaneity always degenerates into ritual, whenever men devise their own ways to worship the gods. But where there is spiritual worship in truth (John 4:24), ritual cannot take control.
Blessings in Christ, my fellow soldier. Hope to meet someday Lord willing.
If I told you who I am, you don't really expect me to believe you will reveal the source of you garbage, do you?
Bubba, I don't trust you in the outhouse with a muzzle on!!
Annie M.
(no login) 67.32.214.193
Re: Re: Message from a "former" worship leader
July 22 2005, 9:56 PM
Annie,
More items for your consideration:
You are absolutely correct that I would not reveal the source.
It is also correct that you obviously did not very carefully read my very carefully worded statement about letting you know:
If I received them by e-mail,
. . . by priority/express mail
. . . or by regular mail
. . . or if they were specially delivered
. . . or handed to me [end of revelation].
It is good to know that you agree with me that this “Worship Leader’s” choreography is “garbage.” You said it “right.” You said it first.
By the way, you just delivered in one short word an excellent description of choreographed worship—GARBAGE!
Annie, thank you!
Donnie
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.197.193
Re: Re: Message from a "former" worship leader
July 22 2005, 11:54 PM
You did'nt read my post very carefully either. It said "you' garbage. It was a typo on my part. It really said "your" garbage. That means it is "yours" not anyone else's. You are very good a spouting on and on and on about what if's and maybe's. When 'ya grow up and get a life, and maybe a couple friends, instead of alienating the world about the truth??
Steppin off my box
Annie
(no login) 70.149.154.151
Whose Garbage Is Worship Choreography?
July 23 2005, 3:55 AM
Annie,
I have worked as a compiler-proofreader. I edit. I notice typos and errors. So, be glad that I didn’t bring it [your typo] to your attention first.
Although I changed the names to “protect the innocent,” I did not make up the documents. Therefore, the documents are not my “garbage.” The worship choreography is THE garbage. That has been precisely the gist of my posts.
And now I’m the one alienating the world about the truth? Sorry, Annie, it’s the other way around. I haven’t changed anything. I’ve been consistent in defending the truth and the church. It is folks like you who have the persistence and determination to change things around—but God does not need any of the change agents’ schemes to pervert or compromise the truth or to improvise God’s will and directives for the church or to transform and restructure the church.
In case you haven’t realized it, it’s the offering of “strange fire before the Lord” (Lev. 10:1; Num. 3:4; Num. 26:61), the introduction of imitated doctrines and beliefs of other religions, and the modifications of God’s scheme of redemption and His principles and commands—that create alienation, havoc, conflicts and division in congregations.
By the way, I think you need to practice what you’ve been preaching to me and others. You know, this thingy about “loving one another.” Only if it were genuine! My observation has been that it dissipates rather quickly when your borrowed doctrines and beliefs are challenged by God’s truth.
Have a great weekend!
Donnie
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.66.169
RE: Message from a "Former" Worship Leader (Annie Mouse)
July 23 2005, 8:53 AM
I never will cease to be amazed at the utterly predictable natures of change agents and others who oppose God's truth and this web site. Having no solid ground whatsoever upon which to support their unbiblical agenda, their pseudo-Christian personalities rapidly crumble to reveal unfortunate, empty shells capable of no greater "achievements" than hurling insults, sarcasm, and/or character assassinations. "Annie" perfectly demonstrates this to us from the dark depths of anonymity:
"When 'ya grow up and get a life, and maybe a couple friends, instead of alienating the world about the truth??"
"Annie" and others of like persuasion exist only to goad and harass, "get under the skin," divide and tear down. Would that they could aspire to higher, Christian virtues.
(no login) 68.154.166.210
Paid “Worship Ministry” at Madison—a Misguided Spiritual Endeavor
August 5 2005, 2:21 AM
“Worship Ministry”—Its LOST Focus on Worship AND FOUND Focus on Musical Idolatry
Only the last name [but not the first character] of each “responsible” individual below has been changed “to protect the innocent.” The following list of “Updates and Improvements” was addressed to the “Worship Team” of the Madison congregation on December 29, 2004:
_________________________________
WORSHIP MINISTRY
ANNOUNCEMENT SLIDES_______Responsible: Keith Hill
Need to run 5 minutes before service begins (Sundays 8:00 A.M., 10:30 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. and Wednesdays 6:30 P.M.) and immediately at the end of each service for 5 minutes.
Add numerous interesting Madison details/factoids with as many pictures as possible.
SLIDE CONTENT_____________Responsible: Keith Hill
Make sure words don’t bleed off the screen for sermon notes or song lyrics. Due to the limitations of the viewable space on the screen in the auditorium, refrain from utilizing the top ¼ to 1/3 of the screen for text.
For song lyrics, use minimal capitalization—generally just first word of slide and any references to Deity. Often the letter O looks better capitalized too, as in O what a glorious God.
Minimal punctuation, only what is critical for understanding. Rarely use ending punctuation (exclamation points, periods, etc)
If men and women sing different parts, call them men and women, not ladies, guys, females etc.
The overall text of a song should be consistent in font size. Be sure that the text size doesn’t change during a complete song.
SLIDE PROOFING____________Responsible: Keith Hill
Be sure to check lyrics against the Finale sheet music if we have that song in Finale. There are three different folders in the Finale file. Most of the music that is finalized is in the “master” folder. Ken’s songs have not been checked by KL [Keith “Clapmaster”] yet but we are still using them. Most of these are traditional songs from the hymnals that Eric and Ken are entering for us to have in Finale. That way it is quick and easy to pull a whole service from Finale most of the time, even the early/evening services.
Utilize a third-party proofer.
If the sheet music is not in Finale, be sure to check the lyrics against the hymnal in Bixler OR the hymnal in the auditorium, depending on where the service will be held.
Review song lyrics for all upcoming services on Wednesday.
Operator review each program with worship leader before each service.
VIDEO MINISTRY____________Responsible: Keith Hill
Have videos reviewed on Wednesday prior to the Sunday service.
Research and prepare good hymn backgrounds for future use; get ahead at least 10 of these to choose from.
Congregational readings from Scripture; get ahead at least 10 selections to choose from.
Congregational readings (creative/poetic), same quantity.
Call to worship passages, same
Shepherd’s blessings, same
SONG TRACKING_____________Responsible: Leanne Sheay
Track song usage in a spreadsheet.
SINGING WORKSHOP__________Responsible: Kay Nickens
Plan course content, logistics, materials/handouts needed.
Plan promotion and communications needs.
PRAISE TEAM & LEADER DEVT Responsible: Kay Nickens
Plan double praise team makeup, rehearsal schedules, music needs.
Plan and implement praise team events, including banquet, training workshops and fellowship events.
Orient new praise team members.
Plan training times for additional worship leaders.
Help facilitate teen praise team launch and children’s chorus.
LONG RANGE PLANNING_______Responsible: Kay Nickens
Prayer & Praise class
Introduction of new songs
Finale (sheet music) needs
Tabulate data from song tracking database
Future video ideas
WRITING___________________Responsible: Kay Nickens
Newsletter development; write additional training articles and news articles.
Marcher articles (Keith’s series on worship, Chris’ articles on P&P)
DEPT. TRACKING PROCESS____Responsible: Kay Nickens
Plan and implement tracking and follow-through for action items
NEW SONG BOOK_____________Responsible: Kay Nickens
Coordinate roll-out of new song book, including sales of individual copies
___________________________________
Matthew 4—“[1] Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. [2] And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred. [3] And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread. [4] But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. [5] Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple, [6] And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone. [7] Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God. [8] Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; [9] And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. [10] Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.”
Matthew 15—“[7] Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, [8] This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. [9] But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.”
John 4—“[20] Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship. [21] Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. [22] Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. [23] But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. [24] God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.”
(no login) 68.19.246.21
Re: Paid “Worship Ministry” at Madison—a Misguided Spiritual Endeavor
August 27 2005, 9:17 PM
I know … I know it’s been a while since Annie told me, “You are very good a spouting on and on and on about what if's and maybe's. When 'ya grow up and get a life, and maybe a couple friends, instead of alienating the world about the truth?”
So, what does “alienating the world about the truth” really mean?
Hopefully, the reader has gotten a pretty good picture of what really goes on with the “worship ministry” that the spiritual leaders of Madison have allowed to go on and on. I thought that the ministry of the church was generally understood to mean some spiritual service which pertains to the preaching of the gospel of Christ leading to the conversion of souls—UNPAID!!! Remember, God’s message is free and it is proclaimed so that the unconverted who hears this message will receive this FREE offer of salvation.
I have presented three important documents that clearly illustrate that the PAID “worship ministry” at Madison is funded with the saints’ contribution intended for the needy saints. “Worship Ministry” … did you say? Wha-a-a-a…???? PAID out-of-focus “services” for the Lord … eh … eh … eh?
Romans 1:1, 25-26—“We then that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak, and not to please ourselves. … But now I go unto Jerusalem to minister unto the saints. For it hath pleased them of Macedonia and Achaia to make a certain contribution for the poor saints which are at Jerusalem.”
Romans 12:[10] Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another; [11] Not slothful in business; fervent in spirit; serving the Lord; [12] Rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation; continuing instant in prayer; [13] Distributing to the necessity of saints; given to hospitality.
In addition, I will never forget what Dan Lucarini said [cf. e-mail above]:
I see you are still stirring up the 'worship' hornet nest! So am I. As a former worship leader, I knew exactly what the order of service you printed means. I chuckled at the 'VCC' (verse-chorus-repeat chorus). At the same time, seeing it again made me realize afresh how trite and manipulative is the entire exercise of 'planning worship'.
Yes, I have a lot of catching up to do. [Meanwhile, the “Worship Leader,” with his “Praise Team,” is not off the hook.] OK, the “worship team” has its performances and holy entertainment unabated—even though the participants, except the “Worship Leader,” with their hand-held microphones are not appearing on stage yet … not yet … but still they are performing.
One elder has passed away; two elders have been appointed by fellow elders; and another elder has resigned since the recent appointment of the two.
By the way, we have discussed in the past the “brotherly relationship” between the former “interim pulpit minister,” Dr. Bruce White, and the “Worship Leader—who was the real boss? It is about time we also see the same “brotherly relationship” between the current “pulpit minister,” Phil Barnes, and the “Worship Leader—who is the real boss? Who wins between the musical worship entertainer and the supposedly proclaimer of the truth?
So, I have bumped this thread. Please review the documents presented earlier.
Donnie
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.119.201
missing you
August 28 2005, 5:16 PM
Donnie,
been missing you the last couple weeks at the assembly. glad to see you are alive and well.
the pm and wm seem to compliment each other. it seems that the wm plans his music around the lessons that we have been learning from the pm...understanding grace through the life of peter. i'd say they work together, or at least it seems to unfold that way.
we did have a rather interesting time of prayer early in the service, with elders and their wives positioning themselves throughout the assembly for a period of prayer.
annie
(no login) 68.19.246.21
Re: missing you
August 29 2005, 5:39 AM
Annie,
Thanks … that I am missed. You didn’t report me as a missing person to proper authorities, did you? I wonder if there are some people who know my stand for the truth and against truth perversion who wish for me to be missing permanently.
What did you mean by “a rather interesting time of prayer … with elders and their wives…”? Did they hold hands together as a symbol of unity with penitent hearts? Did Phil Barnes and Keith Lancaster hug each other in appreciation of each other’s duties and responsibilities?
You know, Dr. Bruce White did appear to appreciate Keith’s efforts often [not sure if he felt obligated or if it was genuine], but his appreciation was unrequited. Keith wanted all the glory and praise all to himself—Hallelujah! Never did he say anything about the messages delivered nor show any cooperative spirit between them. Oh … I see. The musical worship covers 75% of the 90-minute period. The rest of the time is for the observance of the Lord’s Supper, the collection and whatever is left is for the sermon. Remember, the entire assembly period is about “worship” according to Keith, and he is the “WORSHIP Leader.” Sermon delivery is only a small segment of the entire worship period. So, the “Worship Leader” is the boss.
Now, I’m not so sure about how Phil Barnes (the current puppet minister) feels about Keith Lancaster (still the “Worship Leader”), and vice versa. Phil has a very talented son musically who could do just as well leading the musical worship as Keith for much less funding with the saints’ money for the needy saints and the poor. My observation has been that Keith, just the same, is never in the mood of appreciating the efforts of someone who is a part of his overall encompassing musical worship leadership role. Keith shouldn’t feel insecure about losing his position as God’s mediator between Him and the congregation as he leads all into God’s holy presence with his rah-rah-rah, clap-clap-clap worship mentality … should he?
I’ll probably continue this post at some other time. Oh, lest I forget, do you think that Phil Barnes is curious about what’s going on at this website? You know, he is young and is probably knowledgeable of the web world. Remind myself to discuss his sermons on God’s grace and its abuses, his sermon delivery … like comparing him with the eloquence of David Jeremiah of the Shadow Mountain Community Church in CA, etc., etc.
Donnie
(no login) 67.32.208.248
Did I miss anything important?
September 5 2005, 10:17 PM
“Did I miss anything important during my 2-week absence?” That was the question I asked at another forum. Chuck Sonn responded: “preacher phil continues to preach the gospel of grace which leads to obedience. i like how he is handling the Word of God. the balcony continues to fill up more each week with new faces. been seeing more faces from the past coming back for whatever reason.”
Rather interesting comment regarding how the “church growth scheme” is doing at Madison! Hmmm!!!!! I have reviewed the stats for August: 1881 … 1823 … 1772 … 2128. Wow! [We’ll talk more about this later.] Key expressions from Chuck’s observations: “NEW FACES” and “MORE FACES FROM THE PAST.”
I have made this statement a number of times before—something to the effect that “church growth” is the result of a “collection of ‘saints’ from different churches [religious groups] in the community or region.”
Let’s see what research has shown. Mark Dunagan of the Beaverton congregation in Oregon has this to say in his article “The Community Church Movement”:
Willow Creek, which is held up as the model of church growth, recently did an internal audit, in which they found that only 2% of their growth consisted of new converts. The rest of the people simply came from other churches in the area. MacArthur observes, “User-friendly, entertainment-oriented, market-driven, pragmatic churches will probably continue to flourish for a while. Unfortunately, however, the whole movement is based on current fashion and therefore cannot last long. When the fickle winds finally change, one of three things may happen. These churches will fall out of vogue and wane; or they will opt to change with the spirit of the age and very likely abandon any semblance of biblical Christianity; or they will see the need to rebuild on a more sure foundation” (p. 188).
We shall continue to discuss….
Donnie
(no login) 63.84.81.70
Yes, you missed it.
September 5 2005, 10:51 PM
While you were out for a few microseconds WE have turned HOSTILE against the Church Growth Cult. Now, that is all wrong. The new stuff I feel brewing seems to be a take off of CM and Piney.com.
However, the very LATEST of the LATEST is called The Missional Church.
Now, being a rational type YOU think that means that we are gonna get all of the singy-clappies and false preachers out of the Widows trough and install a GO button. But, whoa! Missional is a Third Incarnation of the Mountain of Ministry Madness: MMM or 3M, melts in their purse; not in your mouth.
You remember that I linked an article from Shelly-York Inc. called the Located Missionary?
You will hear Missional Meetings, Missional Teams, Missional Budgets, Missional Musical Teams and Musical Planning and Procedures. I am sure that people are forming Located Missional Forums staffed by the Horizontal Recliner Evangelist Specialists and Missionaries in Residence.
The Mennonites and probably others already offer a Ph.Duh in The Missional Church. I am sure that you can get an associates degree in Mistress of Missional Ministry or Missional Administration.
Look for your Missional Revised Version!
John (no login) 167.219.0.146
Re: Yes, you missed it.
September 13 2005, 9:55 AM
Any more missional talk?
(no login) 70.149.148.240
“Oh, I was made for this: to know your tender kiss”
October 3 2005, 3:01 AM
I have already posted the following (cf. thread: “I am music and I write the songs”; post dated June 5, 2005), but it is worth repeating here. Madison’s “Worship Leader,” along with his musical worship praise team, was on tour this Sunday (10/2/05). But the “Contemporary Musical Worship HourPlus” had a substitute Praise Team [also with their “own” microphones]. There were 11 or 12 contemporary “Christian” musical pieces sung/performed—ALL contemporary—and NOT ONE from the hymnbook. A couple of these would be erotic/romantic songs to someone who knows nothing about Christianity. Hopefully, there was no atheist or pagan in attendance. So, here’s the post:
“Oh, I was made for this: to know your tender kiss”
Graham Kendrick, who wrote the following song in 1995, is ALSO one of those who have exploited the “Christian music” business for profit in the name of the Christian religion. He has written “several hundred songs” that organizations such as www.worshipmusic.com promote. There are a few of Kendrick’s religious music pieces that are ALSO in Keith Lancaster’s collection of songs for Madison (see notebook #170).
Doesn’t any man or woman wonder about the emotional or erotic impact on his/her nerve endings when certain words or expressions in the song are uttered … whether or not the name of Jesus is mentioned in the song? As the chairman/president of the BBN (Bible Broadcasting Network) has said recently about CCM (Contemporary Christian Music), many men are embarrassed and do not participate in the singing of certain contemporary songs that express how “beautiful” Jesus is, etc. The song “I Stand in Awe” [really?] begins with: “You are beautiful beyond description.”
Well, again, in the song below, certain words such as “you” and “your” are not capitalized to get my point across. You know, there are some songs of romance that contain expressions as “your love divine.” But the word “divine” in a natural love song does not qualify it as a hymn or spiritual song. So, are you ready?
Title: “I Was Made for This”
[v.1] Oh, I was made for this: to know your tender kiss,
to know a love divine, to know this love is mine,
and I was made to laugh and I was made to sing,
given the gift of life, you gave me everything.
[v.2] My feet were made to dance, my spirit made to soar.
My life is not by chance, you give me more and more, for I was made for you and I have made my choice,
and all that stole my joy I left at the cross.
[v.3] When I was far away you ran to welcome me. I felt your warm embrace; I saw your smiling face,
and when you rescued me I saw my destiny:
to worship you my Lord, to be a friend of God.
So I will celebrate and drink your cup of joy.
I will give thanks each day and sing. My joy is found in you and you are all my joy.
Oh, I was made for this. I was made to love you Jesus. I was made for this.
Oh, I was made to love you Jesus. I was made for this.
Well, there are too many I … I … I … I … I … me … and … my.
What about just singing “Jesus loves me! This I know, for the Bible tells me so.” Or, “Let the beauty of Jesus be SEEN IN ME all His wonderful passion and purity.”
_____________________________
Well, here’s another one for your consideration:
Title: “In Moments Like These”
In moments like these I sing out a song, I sing out a love song to Jesus.
In moments like these I lift up my voice,
I lift up my voice to the Lord.
Singing I love you Lord, singing I love you Lord,
Singing I love you Lord I love you.
Singing I love you Lord, singing I love you Lord,
Singing I love you Lord I love you.
[Exactly as on the sheet … except that “You” is not capitalized here]
Wonder why surveys show that many “Christian men” refuse or are hesitant to sing erotic/romantic songs like these to Jesus??? Additional note: I haven’t heard of English-speaking nations having a male family member named “Jesus” or “Judas.” But watch out when this song is translated, e.g., into Spanish. Alberto would be singing a love song to Jesus.
Donnie
(no login) 204.118.121.101
Why don't some men sing?
October 3 2005, 7:04 PM
I don't know--I've never met one who expressed such concerns. I'm really wondering, and I'm not trying to imply anything other than an honest question, have you ever met a man who expressed such unease (unless prompted by another)?
If that is the case, why would this song not bother them?
There is a name I love to hear, I love to sing its worth;
It sounds like music in my ear, the sweetest name on earth.
Oh, how I love Jesus,
Oh, how I love Jesus,
Oh, how I love Jesus,
Because he first loved me.
If it were sung, "first and last verses only" , would an atheist be led to believe it were "erotic".
Or could it be when its a song I grew up with (as I grew up singing "Oh, How I Love Jesus") that I would never think to question the intent of the song or its interpretation but when its a song that I'm unfamiliar with or, quite obviously, one whose "style" someone dislikes they begin to "see" problems and suggestive undertones that others who are unenlightened and innocent enough to interpret within the relationship of humble servant adoring a loving Savior just don't see.
I sometimes wonder if its not just a matter of some guys are so nervous with the very word "love" and so messed up as to what it means (last I checked, John wrote by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit that "God is love") that they will always feel more comfortable singing about something else.
God bless.
kent (no login) 66.189.13.108
Re: Why don't some men sing?
October 3 2005, 10:24 PM
you have too much time on your hands donnie if you are worried about this!
Worry more about the homeless, the addicts, etc. than a song.
you really think Jesus cares a lick about a silly song.
(no login) 68.19.239.67
What should some men sing?
October 4 2005, 6:18 AM
Quite to the contrary, Kent, I do not have the luxury of wasting the rest of my waking hours writing about self-serving, erotic songs. But you may have given me an idea that I may prefer, after all, the “Ave Maria” [Hail Mary, Mother of God] Catholic prayer/song to singing, “Oh, I was made for this: to know your tender kiss.”
Worrying about the homeless and the addicts vs. worrying about erotic songs? Sounds like comparing “a cow and a pineapple” to me!
As to your last question, “You really think Jesus cares a lick about a silly song?” I know the answer. What do you think?
(no login) 68.19.239.67
Re: Why don't some men sing?
October 4 2005, 6:32 AM
Joe,
I don’t know … why should a man “confess” his concern about an “erotic” song to someone else? Think about it. Well, maybe, if there is a confession booth.
One thing we need to remind ourselves is the “me” generation we’re living in. There is a difference between a hymn that “teaches and admonishes” in loving God BECAUSE He first loved me versus a singy-clappy praise music about a love song to Jesus—“Oh, I was made for this: to know your tender kiss.”
I believe it best to fully express the meaning or message of this 1855 (not 2005) hymn:
[v.1] There is a name I love to hear,
I love to sing its worth;
It sounds like music in mine ear,
The sweetest name on earth.
[v.2] It tells me of a Savior’s love,
Who died to set me free;
It tells me of His precious blood,
The sinner’s perfect plea.
[v.3] It tells of One whose loving heart
Can feel my deepest woe;
Who in each sorrow bears a part,
That none can bear below.
[Chorus] O how I love Jesus,
O how I love Jesus,
O how I love Jesus,
Because He first loved me.
“O how I love Jesus” is an expression of devotion in response to “because of His precious blood that my Savior first loved me.” In contrast, it’s I—personally—REMINDING someone forgetful or I am BRAGGING about SELF in “I was made to love YOU, Jesus” or “to know your tender kiss.”
Please don’t forget that I mentioned “survey” at the outset. BBN is not a church-of-Christ-related radio/web program. Besides, the survey/research also indicated that contemporary “Christian” music impacts or influences the women much more than the men by a wide margin.
Donnie
(no login) 70.149.159.67
BBN’s Perspective — “CCM Music” (by Dr. Lowell Davey)
I picked up a national magazine this past week, and the article that caught my eye was about the explosive growth of evangelical churches in America. Many of the megachurches are franchising their name like the commercial world. Some of these churches have "ministries" that bring in millions of dollars from coffee shops, restaurants, auto repairs, book stores, consulting arms, rock concerts, affiliate fees and others things that develop income. Some preach the "Prosperity Gospel" taking in millions, while sharing false teachings and phony miracles with a message of self-evaluation and positive thinking.
One clear identity of all of these "megachurches" and media outreaches is not the Bible, evangelism, teaching or preaching. It is the rock music. It is the glue that holds it altogether. Who would have thought that the Church of Jesus Christ would one day utilize a music that is totally sexual in its origin and designed with a beat that drives the physical body to an emotional ecstasy and calls it "worship."
A book I recently received had the words of several Contemporary Christian Music songs. They spoke of some fantasy relationship. Because God, or Jesus, or a Biblical reference, or spiritual implication was not included in most of the songs, they could apply to any physical love affair between two people. The songs had intimate statements that I could hardly believe. I thought, how would a teenager interpret these? How would an unsaved person read this? The fantasy of a love relationship would quickly appeal to a fleshly interpretation. Put the rock beat with the words and you’ve got the picture.
In the book BBN is sharing this month, Dan Lucarini, who was a worship leader in a CCM church, says, "Like other contemporaries, I was blind to the subtle, sexual influences creeping into my worship teams and unwilling to admit that my worship music could possibly be tainted with sex."
Because of our concern at BBN about this sensitive issue, we will be focusing on music this month. We believe it is a battleground where Satan is deceiving many Christians. After all, he knows the power of music. He was the choir leader in heaven before his fall, and many of his choir members fell with him. I do not know the music they played or sang, but I am sure of one thing. He knows that music is a powerful tool to move people, and he is determined to destroy the Church of Jesus Christ. What better way than to use the tool he is most familiar with - music.
July is a summer month that is always a financial challenge, and we trust you will share during this time a special gift so that we may share the most beautiful music this side of heaven. "To God Be The Glory, Great Things He Hath Done" Thank You!
Headline News in 2002: “Concerned Members” Mentioned?
October 10 2005, 5:46 AM
Headline News
Madison’s conflict reflects broader issues
By Lindy Adams
January 21, 2002
The Christian Chronicle - Its name is legendary and brings to mind legendary people and associations. It was our first multi-faceted, multi-programmed mega-church.
It’s the church led by Jim Mankin, Jimmy Sites, Steve Flatt and, of course, the inimitable Ira North. It’s Amazing Grace Bible Class, Happy Hills Boys Ranch, song leader Nick Boone — yes, Pat’s brother.
It’s Madison.
It’s the church on Gallatin Road in suburban Nashville, Tenn., which under the leadership of bigger-than-life Ira North, went from being a typical congregation to being what some considered our flagship. In its heyday it was the largest congregation in churches of Christ.
But in recent years Madison has fallen on hard times.
North succumbed to cancer in the 1984 and in the years since the congregation has gone from a well-oiled machine to one in need of overhaul.
However, recent attempts at an overhaul put those committed to the old ways and those seeking the new at terrible odds.
Tensions rose. Tempers flared. Members were set against members. Some left.
At the end of 1998, Madison’s Sunday morning attendance was 3,240. Today it is 2,433, a loss of about 800 members, according to Jerry Sherrill, Madison’s business administrator.
So traumatic, so heart-breaking, so disconcerting.
But too typical.
Across the nation religious groups from Baha’i to Baptist are embroiled in similar conflict, reports Faith Communities Today, a research project of the Lilly Endowment which released its findings on 42 U.S. religious bodies last March. Frequently the conflict centers on worship issues.
The FACT study — which included data from congregations among churches of Christ — found that 59 percent of all religious bodies nationwide changed worship practices a “great deal” in the last five years and that such change brought conflict.
As any attentive observer knows, our fellowship is no exception. Since mid-August, word of conflict in 11 congregations has been reported to the Chronicle. The discord is of several sorts, but often regards worship.
But what happened at Madison?
Some parts of the story are disputed. While Madison’s elders declined to discuss the details of the conflict, some members and leaders shared their insights.
The church’s troubles began in earnest in early 2001, members say. A contemporary Sunday morning service in the church’s basement fellowship hall was added to two existing traditional services. The new gathering quickly outgrew its quarters.
In February, elder Buck Dozier read an elders’ statement saying the contemporary service would replace the second traditional Sunday morning service in the main auditorium. The next Sunday some members walked out of the contemporary worship, according to deacon David Hardin.
From that Sunday, the conflict escalated. Madison’s prominence drew coverage in local media — including television reports and two articles in The Tennessean.
A few traditional members, calling themselves “Concerned Members,” began a web site with complaints and reports and mailed 2,500 questionnaires to members polling them about issues.
A member from the traditional worship service called publicly for the elders’ resignation.
Meanwhile, participants in the contemporary worship chafed under decisions by the elders requiring a mixture of traditional and contemporary songs and regulating the length of the sermon.
Practices including use of a praise team on Sunday morning and singing during communion have been prohibited, according to member David Hardin.
However, other Madison sources say such issues are under study.
In September the elders called for help. Larry Sullivan of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, Pepperdine University, made the first of several visits to Madison to help resolve the difficulties.
Sullivan instructed the congregation in dispute resolution skills, conducted interviews with members from various factions and assembled teams to discuss differences. He said Madison, like many churches, is struggling with addressing contemporary culture without abandoning the truths of Christ’s message.
Madison members are frustrated, he said. “They want to reach out and be pertinent to our culture today, yet not lose the underpinnings of the Gospel. I think everybody sees the dilemma and is trying to address it in certain ways.”
As Madison seeks resolution to its ills, what in its experience can offer insight to other churches? Certainly that no church, regardless of prominence, age, history or leadership is immune.
Fifteen years ago few members could have imagined the fracturing that has occurred at Madison, according to sources at the congregation.
As the Madison elders said in their February statement, “… we believe that these times challenge us to humbly re-look at what we think and believe. … We have sought the perfect church in the New Testament, but found them struggling also. We pursued infallible practice and spotless leadership in the Restoration Movement. We found greatness and inspiration, but no perfection. Regardless of our age or position, we all must admit our humanity, and humble ourselves before God.”
COMING IN OUR SERIES ON CONFLICT: the Chronicle will examine additional sources of conflict, how to address them and lessons to be learned from congregations who have lived through strife and endured.
_________________________________________
(NOTE: “At the end of 1998, Madison’s Sunday morning attendance was 3,240. Today [that was in January, 2002] it is 2,433, a loss of about 800 members….” For more recent statistics [1,600? … 1,700? …] , see near the beginning of this thread and Madison’s website: http://www.madisoncofc.org/Marcher/index.aspx.)
(no login) 195.175.37.8
Praying and Laying
October 10 2005, 10:01 AM
Vol. 54, No. 39, September 28, 2005 states the return of the prayer partners to Madison.
Actually the prayer partners may have always been at Madison, I am not sure, but the recent Marcher does assure us that the program is not dead and will be a tool for Mrs. Barnes.
The "prayer partner" program will always be remembered as one of the Gainsville programs from back in the late 70's and early to mid 80's. The preacher who begin this program at Gainsville was fired in the mid 80's for the reoccurring problem of praying and laying with the ladies.
The Marcher reads:
One of the goals of the Mugs ‘N
Muffins Morning is to connect people
through prayer partners. Sharing a
problem with a prayer partner is like
cutting your problem in half,” said
Barnes.“It just lifts the burden on
you so much more when someone
else is also taking your problem to God.
“All Madison ladies are encour-
aged to attend this special time
together and to bring a guest.
In Christ,
Jimmy Wren
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.69.148
RE: Praying and Laying
October 10 2005, 1:47 PM
Why are only ladies invited to become "prayer partners"? Don't men also have a "need" to have prayer partners? Just wondering.
(no login) 207.248.240.118
RE: Praying and Laying
October 10 2005, 6:24 PM
Hello Dr. Bill
That does seem a bit unusual. Maybe they are trying to keep from having a repeat of Crossroads, you know, the handsome young married preacher with the handsome young married ladies.
A situation like that can drive the elders crazy plus the paying out of hush money from the church treasury.
In Christ,
Jimmy
(no login) 63.84.81.45
Spill your beans? That's obscene!
October 10 2005, 2:47 PM
Let's see: I have MY problems but if I also take on YOUR problems then I have fewer problems? Do I have it? Just what busy housewifes need: the pastor person conjuring up another affair to keep them from getting bored.
The old SHEPHERDING DODGE again? In his later years Lynn Anderson has turned to the old but new DISCIPLING or SHEPHERDING routine. Everyone gets matched up but some matches are more even than others. See
This is the old Cross Roads and later the Promise Keepers KGB. Having failed in many respects PK has adopted SHEPHERDING which is shades of the International Church of Christ.
And yet these kind of people, though they are as it were of another commonwealth,
no man dares despise, especially those begging friars, because
they are privy to all men's secrets by means of confessions,
as they call them. Which yet were no less than treason to discover,
unless, being got drunk, they have a mind to be pleasant,
and then all comes out, that is to say by hints
and conjectures but suppressing the names.
But if anyone should anger these wasps,
they'll sufficiently revenge themselves in their public sermons
and so point out their enemy by circumlocutions
that there's no one but understands
whom 'tis they mean, unless he understand nothing at all;
nor will they give over their barking till you throw the dogs
a bone. And now tell me, what juggler or mountebank
you had rather behold than hear them
rhetorically play the fool in their preachments,
and yet most sweetly imitating what rhetoricians
have written touching the art of good speaking?
History proves it: they ALL spill YOUR beans and the Preacher has you by the short hair in case you sass him.
I just read the article by Lindy Adams and am amazed at how this same thing has been played out at so many local congregations. Brownsville Road church of Christ here in Memphis has lost over half of its membership from reports that I receive. My home church at Sycamore View went through similar struggles, but at least for the moment appears to be past this as a problem and is growing rapidly once again. Please see my thoughts on this issue posted on my web site in October 2001 at __________ Memphis, Tenn.
_____________________________________
In the war of words it is funny how the selection of terms can change things. For example, is it anti-abortion or is it pro-life? Is someone pro-abortion or are they just pro-choice?
In your January issue story about the conflict at the Madison congregation, there were those pesky words again — “traditional” and “contemporary.” Is it traditional or is it scriptural? (“We certainly don’t want to be bound by those nasty old man made traditions”). Is it contemporary or is it just plain un-scriptural? ________________@_________
_____________________________________
I appreciated the recent article the Chronicle ran on the Madison Church of Christ. I’m 41 and went there all my life. My mom and sister (went there) for 50 years. In December we all had to leave. It was heartbreaking. It will never be the same again.
We did all that we could do — met with elders, wrote many letters to the elders, went to group meetings, met with Larry Sullivan from Pepperdine (the mediator), even helped in getting over 700 people to sign a petition to restore our church. After (that) one elder said to the whole congregation, ‘Just get over it’ (That was) how things (were) going to continue, (so) we left. It is a spirit church. We left the last Sunday of October 2001 and on the first Sunday of December. We placed membership at the Neely’s Bend Church of Christ here in Madison. ___________@_____
_____________________________________
(no login) 66.169.126.183
submitted article by a Kentucky Preacher
October 12 2005, 10:26 PM
Flip-Flop
By Steve Higginbotham
April 15, 2005
At least in four Old Testament passages, the expression, "The Beauty of Holiness" is employed. Holiness is indeed beautiful. As good as repentance, confession and forgiveness are, holiness better. We live in a time when the value and beauty of holiness is not recognized, and is not seen for what it is.
In fact, rather than focusing upon the "Beauty of Holiness," we live in a time when people have flip-flopped this biblical expression and are being deceived by what they think is the "Holiness of Beauty."
Just look around. Take note of how the church seems more preoccupied with "beauty," rather than "holiness." Want an example? Congregational singing is giving way in some churches to special group singing and choruses. Forget about the "beauty of holiness" in the cracking, failing voice of an aged Christian widow singing, "Heaven Will Surely Be Worth It All," and make room for the perceived "holiness of beauty" in the melodic, trained voices of professional singers.
Friends, don't misunderstand. There is nothing wrong in beauty, it's just not our aim. Our aim is holiness. The value is not in beauty, but holiness. Remember we are to worship God in the "beauty of holiness," not in the "holiness of beauty."
"Give unto the LORD the glory due to His name; Worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness" (Psalm 29:2).
Eddie (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: submitted article by a Kentucky Preacher
October 14 2005, 4:13 PM
I noticed most of the articles about church conflict are dated several years ago. Ya'll think the conflict is over and Ya'll aint woke up and realized you lost???
(no login) 65.1.123.177
What about dating back to centuries or over 2 millennia ago?
October 15 2005, 11:36 AM
Eddie,
Disregarding facts dating back to several years ago does not help in deterring church conflicts which often can be avoided when leaders of the church are forewarned. Maybe, you have no interest in history. And, if so, there’s nothing I can do to reverse that situation—that’s really up to you.
A lot of lessons can be learned from the Holy Scripture. For example:
I Timothy 4:1-3 states—“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils. Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears….”
Hebrews 13:9—“Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines.”
I Peter 2:1—“But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.”
The coming of Christ and the establishment of the church had been prophesied and both came to pass over two millennia ago. Are they now irrelevant? No, Eddie, we’ve been awake all along. Besides, the church will survive and endure to the end.
Donnie
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.70.33
The Real Winners
October 15 2005, 4:53 PM
Eddie stated, “Ya'll think the conflict is over and Ya'll aint woke up and realized you lost???”
The change agents scoff and laugh at those of us who proclaim the Word of God, who admonish all to stay on the narrow path, who strive to keep worldliness and man-contrived doctrines out of the Church. Because so many churches are “changing” and becoming more contemporary, more like the world, the change agents, heretics, and other detractors of the Church of Christ revel in the delusion that they have “won.” Is their supposed victory filled with the spirit of Christ or merely a lust for the world? Is their supposed victory truly Christ-centered or man-centered? Want to know who the real winners are?
1. Those who are willing to hear the Word (John 6:45 KJV).
2. Those who believe the Word (John 3:16 KJV).
3. Those who repent of their sins (Luke 13:3 KJV).
4. Those who confess that Jesus is Lord (Matt. 10:32 KJV).
5. Those who are baptized for remission of sins (Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, 1 Peter 3:21 all KJV).
6: Those who faithfully follow the New Testament to the letter, from Matt 1:1 (KJV) to Rev. 22:21 (KJV).
Those who have difficulty accepting warnings of several months ago about the Change Movement will have even further difficulty accepting the New Testament, which was written some 2,000 years ago.
Eddie (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: The Real Winners
October 17 2005, 4:15 PM
Dr. Crump,
Have you changed the 5 acts into 6, and thus become a change agent?
Please accept this question in the humor it was given!!
EW
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.70.134
RE: The Real Winners (Eddie)
October 17 2005, 6:33 PM
Who's changed anything? Look again at this list of the real WINNERS. The first five winners on the list are those who have taken the five steps to salvation. Those five steps haven't changed, for the New Testament hasn't changed (hint: the five steps are deduced by studying the New Testament). The sixth winners on the list are those who, now with faith in their salvation, live Christ-centered lives every day according to the entire New Testament. It's not enough just to take the five steps and say, "I'm now saved," then shirk it all. The remainder of the Christian life must follow the entire New Testament in all things that Christ commanded us (Matt. 28:20 KJV). But you knew that all along. I regret that you find "humor" in all this.
Eddie (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: RE: The Real Winners (Eddie)
October 17 2005, 9:39 PM
Dr. Crump,
There is humor in everthing. I see you don't have much in you. On a serious note, could you tell me how many "commands" are found in the NT.
EW
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.66.129
RE: The Real Winners (Eddie, Oct. 17)
October 18 2005, 8:49 AM
Jesus said, "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and lo, I am with you alway, (even) unto the end of the world" (Matt. 28:19-20 KJV). It was Jesus who used a form of the word "command." The New Testament contains His commands, given directly by Him or indirectly through the apostles' epistles.
The "number" of commands He gave to us is irrelevant, and I think you know that. Have I counted them? No. Why should I? Why should you? Should we obey only three or four instead of, say, five or ten? The important thing is that we obey ALL of them. And saying, "I can't obey ALL of Jesus' commands until I know exactly how many there are" just won't wash as a weak attempt to be humorous. If you study the New Testament, those commands will become a part of your life, and you will think, not in terms of how many there are, but in how you can live up to them as a whole. Living up to them will be far more important than worrying about their number. My friend, I hope you will take Jesus' commands as serious business and not waste precious time trying to count their number for purposes of being witty and "humorous."
Yes, friend, there is humor in life, but with some subjects, humor is inappropriate. I think you know that, too.
Eddie (no login) 68.52.253.237
Hebrews 13 (for Donnie)
October 16 2005, 11:35 AM
Donnie,
Perhaps you should read ALL of Hebrews 13. There's a good message for all of us.
HEB 13:1 Keep on loving each other as brothers. 2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so doing some people have entertained angels without knowing it. 3 Remember those in prison as if you were their fellow prisoners, and those who are mistreated as if you yourselves were suffering.
HEB 13:4 Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral. 5 Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said,
"Never will I leave you;
never will I forsake you."
HEB 13:6 So we say with confidence,
"The Lord is my helper; I will not be afraid.
What can man do to me?"
HEB 13:7 Remember your leaders, who spoke the word of God to you. Consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith. 8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.
HEB 13:9 Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings. It is good for our hearts to be strengthened by grace, not by ceremonial foods, which are of no value to those who eat them. 10 We have an altar from which those who minister at the tabernacle have no right to eat.
HEB 13:11 The high priest carries the blood of animals into the Most Holy Place as a sin offering, but the bodies are burned outside the camp. 12 And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through his own blood. 13 Let us, then, go to him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace he bore. 14 For here we do not have an enduring city, but we are looking for the city that is to come.
HEB 13:15 Through Jesus, therefore, let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise--the fruit of lips that confess his name. 16 And do not forget to do good and to share with others, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.
HEB 13:17 Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you.
HEB 13:18 Pray for us. We are sure that we have a clear conscience and desire to live honorably in every way. 19 I particularly urge you to pray so that I may be restored to you soon.
HEB 13:20 May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, 21 equip you with everything good for doing his will, and may he work in us what is pleasing to him, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
HEB 13:22 Brothers, I urge you to bear with my word of exhortation, for I have written you only a short letter.
HEB 13:23 I want you to know that our brother Timothy has been released. If he arrives soon, I will come with him to see you.
HEB 13:24 Greet all your leaders and all God's people. Those from Italy send you their greetings.
HEB 13:25 Grace be with you all.
(no login) 70.157.41.90
Revised: “There’s a good message for all of us”
October 16 2005, 9:52 PM
Eddie,
Thanks for the message. (A portion of your beginning paragraph is appropriate; so, this post is titled based on your statement: “There’s a good message for all of us.”)
When proponents of the Change Movement are challenged, one of their defenses against those of us who are opposed to changes that are controversial in nature and have no redeeming value is the accusation that love is absent among the opposing brethren.
While I have maintained all along that LOVE—which one either does have or does not have—is not the issue whatsoever. Well, I still believe that LOVE is not the issue. So, then, if LOVE is not the issue, what is the issue? ANSWER: changes being forced upon those who do not welcome or want or need them. However, the reminder from Eddie has made it even clearer for me. The explanation follows.
I realize that changes in doctrine to accommodate the denominational neighbors and friends are a part of the Change Movement scheme. This part of the slick maneuver by the change agents is often overshadowed by the more obvious changes, such as changes related to “worship content.”
O.K., let’s put aside doctrinal issues for now. So, we’re getting to the more obvious issue—and many call it changes in “worship style.” My contention is that any reference to the word “style” is deceptive—change agents, of course, are known to deceive. The word “content” is the accurate description of the enforced changes in “worship.”
Now back to LOVE. What if the current “Worship Leader” had not taken upon himself or had not been allowed to take the lead in doing his self-serving thingy called rhythmic handclapping? What if he had not introduced his elite musical group called “Praise Team” [with microphones - - - > = < - - - performance] into the assembly? What if he had only rejected certain erotic “praise” songs and unscriptural musical pieces written by Twila and others in the money-venturing Contemporary Christian Music industry?
Above all, if there was only LOVE among the change movers? The change-at-any-cost-for-any-cause proponents should have known that many members of a congregation being intruded upon would be OFFENDED!!! As in Madison’s case, WHAT IF there had been LOVE on the part of the intruders in the first place? Could the rift and the upheaval been avoided? Guess what? No … no … no one would have to guess. The answer is clear.
By the way, you would think that by now, all the current elders at this congregation should have learned more about sensitive issues. Well, a few of them haven’t yet. During the singing of the “dismissal” song titled, “Take the Lord with You,” two “new” elders [one of whom had led the “Shepherd’s Prayer” prior] were clapping their hands to the beat of the music on the stage right before the congregation. “Take the Lord with you everywhere you go. In the street, in the home, on the job [… and what about the jobless…], all alone, highways, byways….”
Donnie
Eddie (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: Revised: “There’s a good message for all of us”
October 17 2005, 4:11 PM
Well, I have to agree with most of what you said. (Did I just say that??) Especially the part about "forced" change. They were warned that changes made too quickly would result in exactly what happened. I'm not opposed to change. I do not believe Madison is doing anything un-scriptual, however I am opposed to the way it was done. I am also opposed to the way Concerned Members gets it's message across. I am opposed to the way you attack people, and not the problem. I also do not think people that have NEVER set foot in Madison should have any opinion at all.
I am also opposed to any institution that has a "staff infection"
Donnie, Am I still classified as a "change agent?"
EW.
(no login) 70.149.148.86
“Am I still classified as a ‘change agent’?”
October 18 2005, 12:26 AM
Eddie,
FYI, the label “change agent” was originated by change agents themselves. Generally, the term “change agent” is attributed to any leader in the Change Movement, usually someone who is well-known in a particular fellowship. For example, Rick Warren, who was originally associated with the Southern Baptist Convention, would be a change agent—a very famous one at that. He is the father of the post-modern church growth scheme that is responsible for the rise of the Community Church Movement. (As you know, he is the leader of the Saddleback Community Church in California.) This means that the church growth scheme has various religious groups “indulging” in it.
The church growth scheme has also infected a number of churches of Christ, one of which is the Madison congregation. The prominent change agents in the brotherhood are Max Lucado of Oak Hills [now a Community Church], Rick Atchley of Richland Hills, Rubel Shelly of Woodmont Hills—just to name a few. These and other men are well-known in the fellowship.
Lesser known change agents are known to infiltrate certain congregations. They collaborate with some, if not with the majority, of the elders of a local congregation. When this occurs, the participating elders and other leaders [e.g., Keith Lancaster] then become change agents. Overall, change agents have supporters and followers who assist in carrying out their usually deceptive scheme. Madison is in this category.
You must know, Eddie, that this site and most members of the church are not opposed to all changes. There are changes that are truly beneficial—such as the use of what the technologies have made available to us. So, let me complete your statement as follows—“I am not [and no one should be] opposed to change so long as the change does not conflict with the Scripture; does not engender controversy, strife and division; does not offend or alienate fellow brethren; is not forced upon others; and is a justifiable necessity—all of the above.”
If handclapping negates just any one of the above, it should be avoided or rejected. Even in the case of using the professional services of a “Praise Team.” Otherwise, if there is a group who insists on pursuing the issue, that group should go somewhere else and start its own, and it has no business interfering and intruding.
Call this hindsight. But in Madison’s situation, the congregation would have remained intact for the most part had the third charismatic contemporary group not intruded and hijacked the second assembly at 10:30. The third group could have easily had its own assembly in the auditorium at another period—say 11:30—and been allowed to do their own thingy!!!!!
I’ll agree with you somewhat that Madison appears to be on the “scriptural” side of the equation—unlike a few other congregations which have changed quite a bit doctrinally. But that’s looking at it on the surface. One doctrinal issue that has stood out so far is regarding tithing—but I think the membership knows better … the doctrine died at the very outset. Some of the contemporary songs written by money-making pop artists are un-scripturally R- or X-rated. [And it appears that your “Worship Leader” cares about the message that’s pleasing to human nature and consumption—to the beat and charismatic—without regard for what the New Testament says concerning singing … “letting the Word of Christ dwell in you richly … teaching and admonishing one another.”] Phil Barnes is noticeably being careful about doctrinal matters in his joke-filled, personal-experience-filled sermons.
Eddie, it is not the intent of Concerned Members to attack any individual member of Madison. The congregation has gone through a lot—and it is simply our objective to warn other congregations which have not yet been infected … to be on the lookout for change agents whose scheme is very subtle. Yes, we’re tough on the prominent change agents and church LEADERS who do not have the fortitude to defend the congregation that they’ve been entrusted to shepherd and oversee.
Eddie, you do have a good sense of humor. I have been using the expression “infected” or “infection.” Guess what? I really like your very descriptive term—“STAFF INFECTION.” I’m not sure how you would use the term. But it suits me just fine to describe Madison’s Worship Ministry staff. How they came up with “worship” as a ministry, only the Bible can or cannot tell. But it certainly has “staff infection.” It certainly was/is the major cause for Madison’s troubles. I believe that if the staff is disinfected, the congregation will be healthy again.
Sorry, Eddie, it took me this long to answer your question. You may be sympathetic to the cause of the Change Movement, perhaps to a certain extent, but, NO—you are NOT a change agent. Unless you want to be one of its leaders … By the way, I have no respect for anyone who accuses me of “sowing discord.” I have/had nothing to do with the mass exodus of members in 2001. You have/had nothing to do with the rift, either. So, you’re just fine.
Thanks for your post!
Donnie
(no login) 70.149.148.115
Is it elder-led or is it ministerial staff-led?
November 4 2005, 8:35 AM
I have just posted an article taken rom “The Christian Chronicle” (cf. thread: “A Better Suggestion—Mark and Avoid!”). It is titled: “Love and truth the way to unity.” Personally, I question the achievability of such a resolution, good as it sounds maybe. While I believe that the list is not exhaustive enough, it’s a better list of factors to consider—much better—than to simply say that there’s only one controversial element in why certain congregations have experienced division and alienation of brethren, i.e., change in “worship style.” The expression “worship style” is in itself very misleading because what’s actually happening is in the change in “worship content”—the culture-driven rather than the divine-driven content in the messages in many of the songs and in the milk sermons.
Here’s the list from the article, “Love and truth the way to unity” (The Christian Chronicle)”:
“The tensions have developed around many issues that have been around for centuries, but some are uniquely related to the Restoration views of the church. The principal questions on the table for debate seem to deal with the following matters:
Authority and inerrancy of Scripture
Translations of the Bible
Biblical interpretation that discounts many teachings/practices as reflections of first-century culture
Music: a cappella singing led by praise teams, with the use of instrumental music for special occasions
Confusing traditional practices and divine authority
Shifting from elder-led to ministerial staff-led churches
View that what one believes is unimportant — only one’s sincerity
Urban churches vs. rural/small town churches;
Attitudes about connections with those not in “Churches of Christ”
The name “Church of Christ” and its history.
These questions pose serious obstacles to perfect unity, but as people with a rich heritage of logical thinking and analysis we should have the necessary tools to work out our differences. As people devoted to Biblical authority and truth we are accustomed to searching for truth with open Bible and minds….”
_____________________________________
How many of these factors have affected the Madison congregation? I will not mention the obvious again, but there is one factor that’s worth your consideration. Is the main reason why the elders at Madison refuse or are unable to solve the still-controversial “Praise Team” issue and the heavy concentration on the “Worship Ministry” [unheard of in the New Testament apostolic age—perhaps “Worship Ministry” is the apostleship replacement in the contemporary world] is that of the “shifting from elder-led to ministerial staff-led church[…]” factor? (Sorry about the long-winded question—please reread the question.)
In other words, who rules [at] the Madison congregation?
Donnie
Jimmy Joe (no login) 12.41.112.201
Choose words more carefully
November 4 2005, 4:55 PM
To rule: power or mode of directing; authority; to govern; to decide authoritatively.
To lead: to show the way; to guide; to direct.
To provide one answer to your question I don't believe there are any rulers at Madison. I believe there is an eldership that leads. Therefore, one may follow or freely go in another direction.
And now I have a question: There is a continous reference to Romans concerning mark and avoid. Donnie, I see that you mark most prevalent yet you don't seem to avoid. Why just practice half of a command?
(no login) 70.157.44.168
Re: Choose words more carefully
November 4 2005, 9:58 PM
Jimmy Joe,
Thanks for your post and for asking.
I thought I had chosen my words very carefully. In fact, this is what my Bible says about the elders:
I Timothy 3—“[1] … If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. [2] A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; [3] Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; [4] One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; [5] (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)” [KJV] (The American Standard Version, as well as other translations, uses the word “rule.” If the Contemporary English Version is preferred, “control” or “in control” is used.)
I Timothy 5:[17] Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.” [KJV]
I think I know why you prefer the word “lead” to the word “rule.” The N.I.V. does not translate the word “rule” unless it is in reference to other than the elders. And speaking of translations—which is another issue listed above—the N.I.V. (New International [per]Version) that the “leaders” have chosen as Madison’s official version in public reading and in Bible classes [whenever Rick Warren’s “purpose-driven” manual is not used], the translated word is “manage” as in “managing” his own house well:
I Timothy 3: “1Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on being an overseer, he desires a noble task. 2Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect. 5(If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?)” [N.I.V.]
However, you brought up a good point regarding an “eldership” that does not “rule” but rather “leads.” Isn’t there a possibility that this form of leadership is not strong enough so that it just allows “other leaders” to lead instead? That in itself is a problem, isn’t it? For example, when the self-titled musical “Worship Leader” is permitted to do his OWN THINGY, including his Praise Team-dominated performances, even when that THINGY is objectionable to many and is not well-received, it is obviously a weakness in such form of leadership.
By the way, the expression to “mark and avoid’ is in reference to those who “cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned…” (Romans 16:17). To “avoid them” does not refer to avoiding the congregation or its members. I KNOW those whom I “mark and avoid.”
Donnie
(no login) 65.1.201.77
The Jolly-Clappy-Wiggly-Waggy Musical “Worship Leader”
November 10 2005, 7:49 AM
On November 6, the “musical worship” concert portion of the “contemporary” assembly began with “Leaning on the Everlasting Arms” (#394). [#394 means that it is from a hymnbook—in contrast to “notebook #” something.] Wow! A hymn … hmmm!
Not so fast. When the program indicates the names of Keith Lancaster, Steve Smith & Jonas Weathers (along with the 16-member Praise Team), then, one would suspect that it’s SHOWTIME with the overpowered “congregational” singing in the background!
(Sidenote: The “Worship Ministry,” I’m sure, experiments with a number of things to ensure that performances are at their best. As far as I know, Keith’s musicians, still with their microphones—these are necessary in order to perform—do not wear their “choir” uniforms. Nor are they on stage [not yet] facing the congregation. The seating arrangement—the staff members tried it across two rows side by side, and now have gone to the front two rows, one in front of the other.)
To be continued…
(no login) 70.149.128.125
For he’s a jolly clappy-wiggly-waggy musical fellow
November 11 2005, 8:14 PM
Another song—“So won’t you sign me up, sign me up for the Christian Jubilee. Oh, won’t you write my name, put it on the roll, ‘cause I’ve been changed….” [‘cause? … is this baby talk or contemporary English?]
Yet another song—“Days of Elijah”; although it is a song about Old Testament characters—Elijah, Moses, Ezekiel, David [and that’s fine]—it is a musical piece turned into a musical EXERCISE so that the professional performers can repeat a line 15 or so times without messing up. Here’s the line repeated so many times with the notes (do re mi) appended to give you an idea of how this portion is sung [… singing eighth notes at 4/4 time sig. should be pretty close to the original music]:
There’s no God like Jehovah. [mi mi mi mi mi mi mi mi]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [mi mi mi mi mi mi mi mi]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [re re re re re re re re]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [so so so so so so so so]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [la la la la la la la la]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [so so so so so so so so]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [so so so so so so so so]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [high do do do do do do do do]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [do do do do do do do do]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [do do do do do do do do]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [high mi mi mi mi mi mi mi mi]
There’s no God like Jehovah. [high fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa]
There’s no God like Jehovah! [high mi mi mi mi mi mi mi mi]
“Don’t Be Afraid” was being sung while the children age 2-4th grade leave the rest of the family to go to “Canaan’s Land” for THEIR OWN WORSHIP “service.” [Which is worse: splitting the congregation into “traditional” vs. “contemporary” … OR segregating the precious little ones from their parents and other members of the family for some advanced community church indoctrination?]
You must be informed that “Don’t Be Afraid” actually has some musical “instruction” to know exactly when to perform “Clap Clap.” I kid you not. It’s written by no other than the jolly “clappy” music fellow—Keith Lancaster (see notebook #133). So, it goes like this: “Be strong and courageous and do not be afraid. [ClapClap].” The musical piece also has other “sound effects”—the other instructions are: “V1, Chorus, V2, Chorus, mod up 1 whole step … repeat V1, repeat Chorus 3 times (softer each time).” If you’re having trouble grasping the visual and sound effects, don’t worry, it’s a part of the programmed musical worship.
Donnie
kent (no login) 66.189.13.108
Re: For he’s a jolly clappy-wiggly-waggy musical fellow
November 12 2005, 9:17 AM
nobody cares donnie.
If you dont like it, for god sake just go to granny white or someplace else. You are going to stroke out over this stuff my friend. I bet your blood pressure is 400!
Chill dude.
(no login) 70.157.41.81
Go someplace else
November 12 2005, 1:44 PM
Kent,
That’s what the musical Worship Leader thinks—that nobody cares. I call it self-deception or in a state of denial. That nobody cares is wishful thinking. Folks are still leaving, you know.
If you like it, then, come to Madison or return to the congregation or church that you left several years ago.
There is no risk in informing other folks and other congregations that implementing unnecessary and controversial changes by force against the will of the majority of the members, thus, causing a religious riot and splitting the congregation, is just not worth it. By the way, my blood pressure is just fine. What about yours? It appears that my informing others is pretty upsetting to you.
I see you’re showing interest in what’s going on. The information is actually for congregations who have not yet been infiltrated and infected with the disease. But you’re free to read and observe.
Donnie
(no login) 70.157.41.81
For he’s a jolly clappy-wiggly-waggy musical fellow
November 13 2005, 2:55 AM
If you are interested in bragging, overrating or entertaining self, this is the perfect self-praise song for you—“I Belong to Jesus.” This was sung prior to the sermon. Although there’s no instruction on the sheet music when to clap, I can assure you that RHYTHMIC clapping begins as soon as the line “I belong to Jesus” is uttered. This charismatic music
… claims that Satan has been defeated and powerless; therefore, now “I belong to Jesus, FREE FROM SIN … I belong to Him, People WE ARE FREE FROM SIN.” Keith Lancaster, you must be joking … right? You even got Kim Barnes [the “pulpit minister’s” wife] all excited! She was just rhythmically clapping away, lifting up [men’s ] “holy hands” (I Tim. 2:8), and swaying to the music and even at your cue applauding after the charismatic music ended.
Then, there was the message about “giving”—such a “deep” topic to remind the attendants about the upcoming Thanksgiving obligation (collection). See the Madison Marcher (http://www.madisoncofc.org/Marcher/pdfs/11-02-05.pdf). The goal is $400,000 to help defray the debt incurred during the massive Vision 2000 construction program. You see, after the mass exodus of loyal charitable, giving and supportive brethren during the church upheaval, it has not been the same financially for Madison. Plus, the church has to deal with high salaries and expenses related to the culture-driven WORSHIP “MINISTRY”—this is a sad misuse of the saints’ collection.
One more song to let you know about—the closing music “We Will Stand.” The solo performed with the “Ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh ooh” in the background; then, “You’re my brother, you’re my sister, so take me by the hand….”
I’m not sure at this point if the two MEN who earlier were performing while facing the congregation with handheld microphones were still co-leading with Keith Lancaster and the Praise Team WOMEN and men.
Donnie
(no login) 70.157.43.236
When the slick maneuver is in its best behavior….
November 14 2005, 8:14 AM
During occasions when those who have left Madison may be visiting, such as in “campaigns” to have an annual “church family” fellowship or Thanksgiving collection (on November 13, 2005) to help pay off the Vision 2000 building project debt, it never fails that the “contemporary” assembly would include more sing-able hymns in the “worship” program.
“O Lord, Our Lord”
“All Creatures of Our God and King”
“Holy, Holy, Holy”
Oops! I thought there were more. Maybe, “God Bless America” counts—it was sung. By the way, I’m not sure if Mr. Keith even realizes that in “Holy, Holy, Holy” in our church hymns, the expression “God in three persons, blessed Trinity” has been corrected and replaced with the expression “God overall, and blest eternally.” No, no, no … I seriously doubt it.
That’s not to say that there were no contemporary music pieces. Yes, peaceful and more reverent songs there were. Songs that would not induce rhythmic clapping! Actually, there were attempts by song clappers to do so regardless of the occasion, but the clapping was “timid” and experienced death on its own accord—thank you, Lord. This proves that if only the Musical Worship Leader would continue to do this … can you imagine [you fill in the blanks…]? You see, when Mark or Kevin or someone else leads, hardly any clapping there is.
Yes, the 16-member Praise Team staff, while seated in the two front rows in disguise [meaning not on stage], still each has his or HER handheld microphone [cannot be “hidden”], co-leading with the Master Professional Musician. It’s about time for the microphones to get “dunked” in the baptistery for their eternal death and burial, but not to be resurrected again. Such action may just help keep souls from going to hell.
Donnie
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: When the slick maneuver is in its best behavior….
November 14 2005, 12:00 PM
Donnie,
Are you telling me that there are actually 16 members of a praise team at Madison? I thought the whole reason that these c of C's allowed praise teams was to "help" members that didn't read music to hear their individual part. How can one do that with a choir?
16 members is larger than most church choirs. As a school choir member, I always knew that was the weakest of excuses as you can't hear the individual part with four members singing at one time.
So, Madison has a choir? Do they dance and clap as they sing? Wow. A show! How entertaining that must be. To think, the 1st Century Christians refused to behave in such a manner as it was paganistic and against God's commands (per their own letters). The Apostles must have been such fuddy duddies. How Madison must laugh at the Apostles and their old-fashion, boring beliefs.
If there was nothing wrong with clapping and acting so "filled with the spirit", why did the clapping die down when other members were attending? Embarrassed, quilty? Both?
Keep up the work! Someone will hear the Truth.
(no login) 70.157.43.236
The Slick Maneuver
November 15 2005, 8:17 AM
PPB,
It didn’t cross my mind why the flag was displayed this Sunday. I just thought … what’s next—the statue of the Virgin Mary? I’m looking at the musical “worship” guide, and the top line says, “Veterans Recognition” [by Phil Barnes]. Besides the “thanksgiving” offering for the building debt (since the church upheaval when many alienated brethren left), the other “special” occasion was the “Veterans Day” thingy.
Well, someone wrote:
“I don't know if you were able to be at services when they began. It began with an instrumental and vocal version of GOD BLESS THE USA, complete with clappers that stood at the appropriate times and started clapping again at different times during the song. It was accompanied by a slide show of military personnel, and then veterans that were in the assembly were introduced at its conclusion. More cheap emotionalism….”
In regard to clapping, I have felt many times that rhythmic clapping is experiencing a slow death at Madison (and probably so somewhere else where this has become part of the “beliefs and practices”). Substitute song leaders usually do not have this clapping issue. It is Mr. Keith, the musical “Worship Leader,” who leads in this extracurricular activity. He is the one that selects the music that makes you wanna sway and dance. [I wasn’t supposed to be watching other folks do their thingy …, but I saw Mr. Barnes swaying to the music and clapping with the left hand holding the Bible—though not as charismatically as his wife Kim does. And this must have been during the singing of “That’s Why We Praise Him [notebook #87]” or “God Has Smiled On Me [notebook #64].”
Yes, indeed, the choir has 16 members. However, do not call it a “choir”—the “traditional” folks might get offended … “they” say. It is the Praise Team [a.k.a. God’s singers?].
… to be continued
kent (no login) 66.189.13.108
Re: The Slick Maneuver
November 15 2005, 4:14 PM
i want BCV where claping in worship is a sin that will send you str8 to hellfire.
And dont give me some bull about jews in the old testement clapping and hissing. We are not to use the OT as an example, right? And Ken, please restain yourself from posting another missive that is unintelligable, ok? Can you do that?
PPB, are you for real, or are you just play acting here Nobody can be as rigid as you. Pull that stick out.
edit that last sentence donnie and your a coward of the 1st order!
(no login) 70.157.43.236
Re: Re: The Slick Maneuver
November 16 2005, 8:44 AM
Kent,
Your very last statement could have been edited out and nobody would have known about the “1st order!” … or, for that matter, your entire post which is of little or no value. Well, actually, the reader should know about your representation of the other side. That’s why it is posted.
I’ll try my best to respond to your statements as follows:
Name the title and date of any post of mine that states that clapping in worship is a sin;
I would ask you to re-read my comment on what might “help keep souls from going to hell”;
The “bull” you mentioned may have been used in OT sacrifices [“the blood of bulls and goats”];
It is good to know of your awareness of clapping and hissing in the OT;
The Old Testament is history—it is there for our learning—there are eternal principles applicable in Christian living and there are many practices that are no longer applicable [just see if you’re interested in offering animal sacrifices and farm products];
Ken is very intelligent and a scholar—you could be the problem—just send him the restraining order and see if he abides by it;
PPB has standards and goals; her respect for God’s truth, her knowledge of the Scriptures, her extensive research and facts—all that is very commendable—we all can learn from each other.
So, Kent, what can we really learn from you?
Donnie
Jimmy Joe (no login) 68.53.115.35
Thingy
November 15 2005, 4:24 PM
Mr. Cruz,
I find myself a little annoyed when Veterans Day is refered to as a thingy. I do not know if your a veteran or not. I am a veteran of the Vietnam War, my father is a veteran of WWII and Korea and my uncle was killed in the Phillipines in May of 1945. If not for the American military you and I would likely be posting in German or Japanese. Most of the time I ignore your slurs but this time I find it very condescending.
I usually find it easier to converse verbally, therefore I intend to greet you graciously and kindly at the next Madison service that we attend together. I know who you are but you only know me from these post. Although I find little that we agree on there is nothing wrong to agreeably disagree.
(no login) 70.157.43.236
Re: Thingy
November 16 2005, 8:47 AM
Jimmy Joe,
I’m sorry that my reference to the “thingy” offended you. Believe me; I have deep respect for anyone who has served his country. I think you misunderstood the context of my remark. Veterans Day was on Friday, and the nation observed the holiday and remembered the great service of the brave men and women. One point I was trying to make was that special occasions and holidays have their own appropriate times and places in society. The bigger point is related to clapping in the assembly of the saints, the purpose of which is to commemorate Christ’s suffering and death on the cross and to study His word—teaching and admonishing one another. We applaud when there’s a great performance, when we are entertained. I think we’ve reached a “point of saturation” [however than means] when the “Worship Leader” prompts the audience to clap while singing “psalms [in written form as in a poem], hymns and spiritual songs” and prompts the audience to APPLAUD for several seconds after the song ends. The preacher enjoys the applause in the middle of his delivery of God’s message.
Yes, I will be glad to meet you the next chance we get, although I’m a little surprised to hear you say that you “find little that we agree on.” Does “little” mean less than 20% when we study the same Bible, when we attend the same gathering, when I’m not saying or teaching anything new that we haven’t already learned in the past? Something to think about, maybe, why such a disparity in our beliefs…?
Donnie
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: The Slick Maneuver
November 15 2005, 4:59 PM
Wayne Jackson makes a statement regarding solos in the church in his article "Are Choirs and Solos Authorized for the Church Assembly?"
Christian Courier: Archives
Thursday, September 21, 2000
I find his logical and grammatically correct interpretation of Paul's verses to be one of the best around (other than the one's printed on this site, of course!). He states it so much better than I ever could:
"Historically, it has been quite evident to most Bible students that the type of music authorized for church assemblies by the New Testament Scriptures is that of congregational singing.
Paul wrote:
“And be not drunken with wine, wherein is riot, but be filled with the Spirit; speaking one to another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:18,19 ASV).
“Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly; in all wisdom teaching and admonishing one another with psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts unto God” (Colossians 3:16 ASV).
There are several important things here. First, the language of these verses is such that it involves a plurality of individuals, entire congregations, in the obligations enjoined. The imperatives, “be filled,” and “let dwell,” along with the explanatory plural participles, “speaking,” “singing,” “making melody,” “teaching,” etc., indicate the activity of the church as a whole, rather than individual action, or that of a small portion of the church, as suggested by the solo/choral arrangement.
Second, the terms heautois (“one to another” – Ephesians 5:19) and heautou (“one another” – Colossians 3:16) are grammatically classified as reciprocal, reflexive pronouns.
According to noted grammarians Dana and Mantey (131), such a usage, as in the contexts under consideration, represents “an interchange of action” in the verbs employed.
J.B. Lightfoot (219) has noted that the reflexive nature of these pronouns emphasizes the “idea of corporate unity.” When the church as a whole sings, there is “speaking one to another;” when one group is active (the choir), and another group is passive (the listening audience), there is no interchange of action.
Choir and solo music does not fulfill the requirements of these contexts. Godet affirms that Ephesians 5:18ff and Colossians 3:16 refer to hymns that are sung by “the whole Church” (281).
Third, the participles “speaking,” “singing,” etc., explain the manner of implementing the imperatives (commands) “be filled” and “let dwell.”
Consequently, if one group (the chorus) may sing and praise God for another group (the audience), that is equivalent to arguing that one group may “be filled” with the Spirit for another, or the choir may “let [the word] dwell” in them as representatives for the balance of the congregation..."
(no login) 70.157.43.236
The Slick Maneuver—Continued
November 16 2005, 8:54 AM
PPB,
Let’s see what I can express in a few minutes as promised. It appears that I may have covered some of it in my responses to Kent and Jimmy Joe.
The additional info I have is from this e-mail:
“God Bless [the U S A] was a recorded song, complete with an entire band … the flag was dropped during its playing. So each week they up the ante. How do we top last week?”
You know, I had said something: “… The elders just don’t get it. Or, they do but are not troubled by the consequences?”
I find the following statements from the respondent very interesting and truthful:
“Power is a dangerous thing. In the hands of the wrong people, it corrupts even the best of us. They aren't bad men, just misguided. The backslaps are affirming and so it goes on and on. They fail to see how manipulated the membership (including them) is. At the root of this is an ignorance. The membership is biblically ignorant, and so, like sheep, are led astray. They want to feel good, and so they find those feelings in a ‘worship assembly.’"
What a powerful and fair assessment of what’s really happening. The slick maneuvers continue. So, what else can I say except that, yes, there are really 16 members of the Contemporary Praise Team (hmmm, C.P.T.). It means 16 handheld microphones!!! It means that God doesn’t need a hearing aid anymore. The count of 16 men AND WOMEN WHO CO-LEAD with the Musical Worship Leader does not include 2 or 3 more men co-leaders (also with their own handheld microphones) facing the congregation. The count does not include the soloist Kevin at times when needed for a complete performance. The count does not include OTHER Praise Teams for other “services” rendered. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were praise team singers scattered in the earlier (8:00am) department or division called “traditional service.” Scattered … so they wouldn’t be noticed…. What else could it be when the “traditional” division is also exposed to several mild “Christian rock” contemporary music. Hmmm?
You said … “help” with the singing? Help is a defense mechanism in “sheep’s clothing.” How else did Christians overcome the need for “help” in the past when the congregation just followed along when a new song was led? Don’t we miss the old-time UNREHEARSED events in the assembly? By the way, if that was honestly the help needed, it is no longer needed. Four or five years of worship rehearsal sounds exhausting to me. Well, please don’t get me started on the performance thingy.
The program was a bit confusing in regard to the Communion [by Phil Barnes] and the Message titled “Suppertime” [by Phil Barnes]. The Communion started out with the “movie” clip describing a family at suppertime. [I don’t have time to explain this except to say that at first the scenario gave me the impression that the leadership is up to something—perhaps a little suggestion that the Lord’s Supper is related to the family supper and that there may come a time when it will no longer be “breaking the bread” that we’ve done for so long and the little cups … BUT A REAL MEAL: (1) to commemorate not only the Lord’s suffering and death but ALSO his resurrection and (2) to consider it [the BIG MEAL] as a means to FELLOWSHIP with other Christians. I’m sorry in advance if my suspicion is mere speculation. Anyway, I was wondering why Phil was exceedingly loquacious for several minutes before the communion. If I had known that was the sermon, I would have taken some notes as I normally do. So, the communion was served [no women serving yet like at Rubel Shelly’s Woodmont Hills Family of God Church (I think) as the clip showed the mother serving (such as passing the bread, etc., to) the rest of the family.
We’ll see what else unfolds at Madison in the future.
Donnie
Estill B. (no login) 66.82.9.90
Re: When the slick maneuver is in its best behavior….
November 16 2005, 6:35 AM
Donnie,
You mentioned "the 16-member Praise Team staff." Are you trying to mislead people that the Praise Team is part of the "paid staff?" That's how it looks to me.
It isn't true, of course.
E.B.
(no login) 70.157.43.236
Re: Re: When the slick maneuver...
November 16 2005, 8:38 AM
E.B.,
I think some of the other staff members of the “Worship Ministry” [ ], besides Mr. Keith, are paid. No, I don’t believe that the “Praise Team” members are paid for their professionally rehearsed worship services.
Donnie
Estill B. (no login) 66.82.9.82
Re: Re: When the slick maneuver...
November 17 2005, 5:27 AM
...and there are 16 now? There were only 8 when I was there.
E.B.
(no login) 68.19.237.249
Re: Re: Re: When the slick maneuver...
November 17 2005, 11:13 PM
E.B.,
You seemed very surprised. Yes, there are 16 now. I was informed just recently by someone who now attends another congregation. Accordingly, that was the plan when this fellow Christian left Madison about a year ago. This info was confirmed by another respondent soon after that—that it is currently 16. So, I noticed this past Sunday on my way out the building there were 16 men and WOMEN [co-leaders] who were still busy performing their after-service extra curricular activities and entertaining with their handheld microphones while folks were leaving the premises.
The reason why I didn’t notice the difference between the 8-member and the 16-member choir groups was due to the loudness of the team. When there were eight, their sound engineers [accordingly] had the sound system rigged up where it would sound as though it was like listening to the Mormon Tabernacle Choir [now … I’m just making up the Mormon stuff to illustrate the point]. Do you get my point? The 8-member team was so loud and overpowering to begin with that congregational singing could not (and still cannot) be heard up in the balcony at least. My observation is that congregational singing is not like it used to be prior to the Praise Team era. Why should it be, when the professional singers are singing to and for the congregation anyway?
Donnie
(no login) 68.19.237.249
Re: Re: Re: Re: When the slick maneuver...
November 19 2005, 3:31 PM
E.B.,
So easy to forget my intended key point earlier! I may have already mentioned this, but the Praise Team has long outlived its claimed design and purpose, that WAS, to help with the congregational singing. It’s been how many years since the discord-causing Praise Team’s professional services were implemented? 2001? How many contemporary Christian rock music pieces have yet to be learned? I guess, the answer to that would be—as many as the Christian Rock artists can produce and be on the top charts.
The conclusion is that even if [but it is] the Praise Team with its performance-loaded services weren’t a discord-sowing entity, it is no longer needed. The truth is that it was never needed in the first place. It is NOW a performing bunch. It has replaced congregational singing.
The assembly of the saints that was originally a school of the Bible where disciples of Christ should meet, study God’s Word and teach and admonish one another has turned into a theatrical gathering where “the saints” are indoctrinated to enjoy “holy entertainment” and to disregard the truth that when the saints gather in God’s presence, reverence and awe Jehovah expects—not cheerleading and making each other feel good about musical entertainment!!!!!!!!!!!!
Donnie
(no login) 63.84.81.95
Costs?
November 17 2005, 11:03 PM
A "normal" working man can lead the singing and many could do a good job.
Therefore, isn't most of Keith's salary and other supporting "ministries" spent concocting tunes, programming and rehearsing and training? I suspect that lighting, sound system etc, etc, etc can be logged against the Teamsters.
For a century and a half our brethren have striven to improve and refine our a cappella singing. Men with fine musical training and Biblical knowledge edited excellent, scripturally sound hymnals. We taught our members to sight read and sing four-part harmony. We trained our song leaders to pitch their selections correctly and properly count the time. We instructed them how to choose their selections and coordinate them with the lesson of the hour. We had singing schools and practice sessions so we might teach and admonish one another in psalms, hymns and spiritual songs and sing with grace in our hearts (Col. 3:16).
In days past, our religious neighbors often visited out assemblies and were impressed with our ability to sing the lovely hymns of praise to Jehovah in a way that thrilled those present. Often they commented positively on the quality and uplifting nature of the singing.
Now a fad is sweeping through our churches. Some have borrowed from their neighbors the practice of projecting the words of their hymns on screens before the congregation. In a recent service in a large congregation using such equipment, I observed the following:
Of the nine songs sung, only two were traditional hymns known by all. Seven were choruses popular within youth camps and devotions.
The words of songs were projected without musical scores or notations.
While each pew had an ample supply of hymnals, the numbers were not announced nor posted.
Therefore, many of the older members sat observing while those who knew the melodies sang for them.
The youth devotional songs were difficult to sing with their unique variations and rhythms. Teens and young adults knew them; most of those above 50 did not.
The song leader had a good voice and knew how to pitch and lead the songs properly. Rather than stand on the podium where he could be seen by all and direct them, he chose to stand on the floor with his praise team and only those in the first few rows could see his hands.
The hymns of the church should be a tie that binds the old and the young of the church together. Today I recall my mother singing, Farther Along and The Old Rugged Cross and other sweet hymns while rocking her babies to sleep. I remember my grandfather who was an elder, singing the great hymns of Zion. But the campfire songs, known and loved by the young, are unknown by senior members of the church. Rather than being a unifying experience, they create a chasm between these vital elements of the congregation.
We do not say that projecting the words on a screen is wrong. Really it is no different than each having the words printed in a book. Hymns are not wrong because they are new or preferred by the young. It is the combination of the all the above that is detrimental to the singing of the church.
It is no wonder that promoters of such programs need a praise team to take up the slack and supply that which has lost from our congregational singing. Very likely some will eventually have a choir to provide the quality singing they desire. Still, others will feel the need to bring in a musician and an instrument to make up the difference. An acorn planted eventually becomes an oak, but a weed seed will grow into a noxious weed. Seeds of change will eventually produce their unwelcome fruit. JHW
”It does not cease to astonish us that Christians generally, and preachers especially are now holding views and making arguments that we opposed and refuted when advanced by denominationalism … fifty and a hundred years ago. Like Paul we (must) declare again the gospel which we preached.” (G. C. Brewer)
__________________________________
CHRISTIANITY: THEN AND NOW
John Waddey, Editor
Vol. 5, Number 4, December 1, 2005
JD (no login) 216.167.160.188
get a life donnie
December 12 2005, 11:05 PM
geez....you are STILL on here spilling out your vitriol, slamming the "church". You need to find more hobbies in your life! The times ALWAYS change. I remember when the Stamps-Baxter songs were put down because they were "new". The youth today DO NOT identify with the old hymns. The church needs to connect with EVERYONE. There is nothing wrong with mixing a few hymns in with mostly new stuff. IF all you got is the "these new songs are killing the church"...then you got to get a new game. Your existing one is really OLD.
JD
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.67.52
RE: Get a Life
December 13 2005, 11:34 AM
Concerned Members: "Thus saith the Lord..."
Detractors: "Get a life!"
Concerned Members: "The Bible says..."
Detractors: "Take a flying leap off a tall building!"
Concerned Members: "Do not preach a different doctrine or change the church to make it more like the world. See 1 John 2:15-17, 2 John 9-11, and James 4:4 (KJV)."
Detractors: "Bleeaahh!!!"
Times change, but the Word of God, the New Testament, does not change with the times. People change the Word of God to make it fit with the times, when the times fail to heed the commands of the New Testament.
Should the church "connect" with everyone? Instead, how about everyone becoming obedient and submitting themselves to the commands of Christ, so that everyone connects with the church? The Word of God, as upheld by the church, is the standard for all to follow, regardless of the "times" and the generations.
"New stuff?" Nothing wrong with it, as long as the "new" doesn't reflect the trends and culture of a worldly society. For example, tacking "Christian" lyrics onto rock music will hardly hallow the rock music. The latter has a long, significant history of being associated with sex, drugs, violence, and rebellion. As far as worship and the church are concerned, stay away from that which is culture-oriented and adhere to that which is New Testament-oriented.
kent (no login) 66.189.13.108
Re: RE: Get a Life
December 13 2005, 1:54 PM
This post has been moved to "The Viper's Den."
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 70.149.148.37 on Dec 13, 2005 9:12 PM
During the last three Sundays, the “contemporary” division (not to be confused with the early assembly [at 8:00] distinctively labeled by the contemporaries as “traditional”—the other division), the contemporary Musical Worship Leader, Mr. Keith Lancaster, changed the tradition by leading/performing “contemporary ‘Christian’ music” only. O.K., it’s perhaps an improvement over the Madison tradition of singing “Christmas” songs in the assembly but only in December.
In regard to the Christmas songs, some of these have great messages in that while proclaiming the birth of Christ [and it doesn’t stop there], we sing about the Lord is come, the King, the Savior. That’s why in the olden days, we would sing some of these songs throughout the year—nothing wrong with that. Interestingly, the 8:00 assembly was led to sing “Joy to the World” this past Sunday—rather odd, since the contemporary division has not sung any “Christmas” song this month … so far.
Wonder why … not one “Christmas” song in the contemporary division of the church in the past three Sundays???? [I’ll check the “worship” guide for each Sunday to ensure this has been accurately stated.] But it remains to be seen, since there is going to be a “union” effort this coming Sunday—there will be a combined assembly at 10:00 of both the “traditional” and the “contemporary” divisions [perhaps “departments” would be another way to look at it ]. Is the union [not to be confused with “unity”] going to sing or “celebrate” by singing “Christmas”songs? Again, the “union” might behave as usual in combined assemblies in which the contemporaries do try very hard NOT to offend “others.” And in this case … by not doing something Christmassy! Hmmm!
Whether or not the attempt at this union is “endeavoring to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace” (Eph. 4:3) or whether it is [again] an attempt to conform to the scheme of some of the mega Community Churches which have altogether cancelled their “worship services” on December 25 for whatever reason(s) … you be the judge.
So … no singing of “Christmas” songs in the contemporary assembly in December? Seems odd? However, there has been a new added feature in the December celebration—the drama titled “A Christian Carol” (“Come enjoy this new adaptation of Charles Dickens’ classic, A Christmas Carol.”). [Please note the words “Christian” and “Christmas.”]. It was performed first this past Saturday; the “final performance” was on Sunday at 7 p.m.
Final reminder: In the last several weeks, in times when the big white screen is “at rest,” the following message is displayed: “The Family at Madison Church of Christ…” Watch out!!! This reminds me of “Woodmont Hills Family of God” or “Otter Creek: a Family of Faith” or just plain “Oak Hills Church [formerly ‘of Christ’]” or “___________ Community Church: a Church of Christ” or whatever.
Donnie
(no login) 65.1.222.185
The Contemporary “Musical Worship” Assembly on Its Best Behavior
December 26 2005, 5:58 PM
The “First Worship” program usually occupies the front of the 4-page guide. But this time (Dec. 25, 2005), it was the silhouette picture of Mary and Joseph and the baby Jesus in the cradle titled, “Behold Your King” bolded.
A line with date and time on the back page is normally formatted, e.g., as follows:
December 25, 2005 . . . . . . Second Worship . . . . . . 10:30 am
But on “Christmas Day,” the contemporary “worship guide” listed the following information on page 4:
December 25, 2005, 10 a.m.
Christmas Day
Silent Night #577 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Keith Lancaster Reading: Matthew 1:18-25 . . . . . . . . Keith E. Hall
Angels We Have Heard On High Love Feast
Hark The Herald Angels Sing #202 Prayer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pat Burch
O Come All Ye Faithful #464 Communion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Terry Ashley Contribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Ashley
Why Did My Savior Come To Earth? #784
I Stand In Awe (notebook) #16
Great Are You Lord (notebook) #9
Beautiful Star of Bethlehem Message: “Behold Your King”. . . . . . . Phil Barnes
There’s Not a Friend #680 Shepherd’s Prayer . . . . . . . . . . . . Chris Gingles
Joy To The World #376
Yes, punctuation marks and other per “Worship Ministry” guidelines similar to how “stuff” on the sacred big wide screens should be displayed were followed. [And, yes, there is a “ministry” called “Worship Ministry” in Saddleback Community Church’s Pastor Rick Warren’s new and improved “New Testament” manual.]
A few “Christmas” songs!!! No new surprises there. Some of the songs, although originally written from not-entirely-biblical perspectives, do contain some essential messages concerning the Savior and the King and man’s need for redemption. One striking difference, however, is that in times past during the holiday season, there wouldn’t be an instance in sermons delivered in which the physical birth of Jesus was briefly mentioned leading up to the point wherein his suffering and death on the cross was the stronger emphasis. In addition, these “Christmas” songs would be sung throughout the year—not just around “Christmas”—an indication that in the gathering of the saints, the celebration of the pagan- and Roman-Catholic-Church-originated Christmas observance was NOT being conformed to. Instead, while the secular and the somewhat-pagan-influenced religious world was in observance of “Christmas,” churches of Christ [and some of the non-conforming religious groups] adhered to the New Testament principle and teaching that Christ’s shedding of blood on the cross of Calvary—not his physical birth—was and is the driving force that leads mankind to repentance and salvation.
In today’s alliance with secularism and the dictates of the post-modern/contemporary religion-ism, certain ones among churches of Christ (feel free to fill in the blanks with names of “mega” Community Churches in the brotherhood), do now observe “Christmas.” In the sermon by Phil Barnes, while his message was laced with personal and other stories of experiences [as usual] to entertain and make the audience laugh, much time was expended on the physical aspects surrounding the “physical” birth. If there were many non-members in the crowd, the opportunity to explain and express God’s plan of salvation was lost. Just because the name of Jesus and some other “religious” terms were mentioned here and there—as it is now the NORM in today’s [contemporary] gatherings—that just would NOT do the job and could not be equated with God’s command to “REPENT and BE BAPTIZED SO THAT” the blood of the Lamb will WASH AWAY one’s sins and be added to the Lord’s church. The gospel of Christ is now diluted and deluded.
Even during the observance of the Lord’s Supper—following guidelines of the “Worship Ministry” to have to deliver a man-contrived message [usually an earthly story or experience] prior to partaking of the bread and the cup—the presiding elder had to pose a question or questions that led some in the audience to “react” with a chuckle or whatever. I thought that the emblematic significance of the observance somewhat dissipated. Fortunately, for the sake of the “senior” folks who would generally be offended by it, there was no leading solo by a female vocalist on the “Praise Team” of a “Communion song.” There was no humming. There was no o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-ing, either, during the commemoration of the Lord’s suffering and death. Just wishing that the presiding elder, in an “attempt” to illustrate the Savior’s love, had not asked one of a number of questions, such as, “What would you have done for me [the elder] had you seen me [the elder] about to be run over while crossing the street?”
Oh, yes, the “contemporary” program had to throw in at least a couple of “hymns” to pacify the visiting folks from the “traditional” group. The rule at 10:30 has been to sing [perform music] mostly Contemporary Christian hits. Yeah, include a “hymn” once-in-a-while so that it’s NOT completely contemporary … but … be sure that the selected hymn—just as many of the “contemporary musical pieces” are—would be very difficult to sing. And, yes, an opportunity for the elite “Praise Team”—the Musical Worship Leader’s performers to really shine and be musically entertaining.
This is getting somewhat extensive and boring, perhaps. Let me just state that this gathering was really a “combined” assembly. The usual time for the “contemporary” group is at 10:30 a.m.—not at 8:00 a.m. You decide whether or not this attempt was to conform to the decision by some mega churches (like Otter Creek Community Church) to cancel “worship services” on “Christmas Day” in the year 2005 or to cancel all Bible classes and meet only for “worship,” as in Madison’s case. At Madison, the combined gathering was at 10:00 a.m.—a time closer to the contemporary hour, instead of at 8:30 a.m. So, this might have been a situation in which the smaller “traditional” group was being invited to assemble with the dominant “contemporary” group. Hmmm! Hmmm! Hmmm!
At any rate, the Musical Worship Leader was in his best behavior. And so was his elite group of musical singers. Whether or not the 16-member choir (“Praise Team”) members were scattered in the audience or still seated in the two front rows, there was only a “slight” evidence of performances. Slight—in the sense that AFTER the first verse [you know … when the other verses are not that familiar to everyone else], of certain songs, such as “Angels We Have Heard on High” or “Beautiful Star of Bethlehem,” the elite team dominated the singing. Of course, with the help of unfamiliar lines displayed on the screen!
Now, Keith behaved pretty well. Not much of the wagging of arms from-east-to-west; no antics; no coaching, prompt or cue to the young people or the audience for a big applause after “making a joyful noise”; no programmed, rehearsed “joy” of rhythmic clapping during singing [obviously since there was not a song to clap to]; no solo; no unintelligible sounds to accompany the singing; no “mourning that God turned into dancing”; no swaying to the music; no feigned looking up above to offer a short prayer after a performance. There was some unnecessary interjection of expressions by the “worship leader” in between music lines.
ABOVE ALL, the Praise Team musicians had their microphones hidden, perhaps, behind the baptistery [this one, I concede, is made up]. It was a serious attempt on the part of the “Worship Ministers” NOT to offend the invited guests! After all, “UNITY” of the divided groups was the underlying objective. In fact, an elder once again declared: “Look at the manifestation of unity in the bond of peace … we are witnessing [numerical] growth in attendance; the Lord has blessed us [as evidenced] in our financial contributions….”
Know what? The goal of some $67,000 prior to the upheaval in 2001 [and what it should be now taking into consideration the rate of inflation] has not been/is not being met in recent years. Contributions have been around $39,000 on the average—maybe a little more than that.
Know what? The combined attendance on this December 25, 2005 did not appear to have exceeded the usual attendance AT the 10:30 assembly ALONE in previous years. This is judging on the seating capacity in the balcony. In years past, the balcony in ONE ASSEMBLY ALONE [at 10:30 when it was “traditional”] would be full of attendants. This time, there were still several rows of empty pews in the back of the balcony.
Conclusion: If the “Musical Worship Leader” and his “Praise Team” in instances like this were on their best “behavior,” shouldn’t they be able to continue this example format at other times—if the church leaders are really, really interested in the UNITY—NOT UNION—of members in the spirit and in the bond of peace? Also … there was a celebration of “Christmas” in a SUBTLE way.
Donnie
(no login) 65.1.222.185
Correction to "... Its Best Behavior"
December 27 2005, 1:32 AM
A minor correction: I mentioned “Otter Creek Community Church” as having canceled its “worship services” on Christmas Day—it should state Bill Hybel’s “Willow Creek Community Church.” Sorry about ‘em “Hills” and “Creeks”—they’re confusing at times.
Donnie
Jack (no login) 68.32.107.216
Re: Correction to "... Its Best Behavior"
December 27 2005, 9:21 AM
Besides that error in fact that Otter Creek is not a Community Church...
(no login) 72.154.193.52
More correction
January 17 2006, 6:55 AM
Another correction to a correction that Otter Creek is a Community Church ... afterall?
What about the psychology of “familiarity does not breed contempt” or the psychology of “getting used to it so gently and subtly”? [See it on the holy screen or in advertisements?]
The Family at
Madison Church of Christ
Originality? Imitation?
Donnie
(no login) 4.152.174.235
Re: More correction
January 17 2006, 11:11 AM
I noticed that the Otters have gone ALL THE WAY: not only have they "erected" the well-known phallic or Asherah pole, it is a stepped pyramid just like the Tower of Babylon and the Jerusalem Temple. All of the FAMILIES or COMMUNITIES prove that they want you to be conjoined twins, bonded and burdened by those performing CLERGY roles 2,000 years after Jesus died to remove the LAW, lawyers and Levitical Warrior Musicians.
Many are now in training for the Missional Church which DOES NOT mean missionary. God as a COMMUNITY or A Family of Gods was invented in the 20th century and popularized by Max Lucado ditto headed by Rubel Shelly.
Leonard Allen described how the Trinity illustrates the relational character of God. He is not merely God the law-giver but One who gives OF Himself in His Son and Holy Spirit.
The Trinity illustrates that God is "loving relationship."
The church, formed under God and in response to Him, reflects the community of the Trinity.
When this doctrine falls, we are prone to sectarianism, legalism, authoritarian leadership, spiritual triumphalism, spiritual elitism, mechanical understandings of baptism and the Lord's Supper, and morbid fondness for controversy.
No one in the history of the world before H. Leo Boles, David Lipscomb College and the Gospel Advocate fell into the blasphemy of identifying God as a FAMILY or TRIBE or a STANDING COMMITTEE. There MUST be three gods because otherwise God would get lonely. And God would not have anyone to TRUST with His deepest secrets to help LIFT UP GOD. I just wonder WHEN God decided that He was lonely? The Family of GODS was the pagan and Catholic TRIAD of Father, Mother and little infant child. The SPIRIT if a person MUST be the MOTHER and that may be why charismatic (musical ) "schools of the Bible" turned into "theaters for holy entertainment" hallucinate that the SEPARATED SPIRIT person guides them into sowing discord and restoring the prophesied end-time Babylonianism
.
The COMMUNITY or FAMILY concept is to fool the fools. By going MUSICAL which is outlawed by God and common sense to any one who grasps that ekklesia is SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE and like the synagogue HAD NO PRAISE SERVICE because it was outlawed in "the church in the wilderness.
How could you be more SECTARIAN than to deliberately sow discord to give A CRUST OF BREAD to a priest-craft which has been OBSOLETED? How could you be more LEGALISTIC than to use "music" as a WORKS-INTENSIVE, worship of talent always known to be the world's OLDEST profession with dysfunctional people claiming to have powers with the gods? How could you be MORE triumphal than using THEATRICAL PERFORMERS where the prophecy of JUDAS trying to triumph over Jesus was a MUSICAL triumph as known by anyone wanting to read.
How could you be more ELITIST than to have CLERGY MUSICIANS which is called "the oldest heresy largely pervading the church?"
Rubel Shelly and John York:Just as identity in Christ is always COMMUNITY identity, our reading of Scripture becomes a COMMUNITY READING as well. We GIVE UP the right of individual interpretation and take on the accountability of SHARED READING.
While we still have access to reading as individuals, we stop asking, "What does this mean to me?"--as though there is such an isolated meaning. Instead we have a GROUP MENTALITY that asks, "What does this mean to US?" we lay aside INDIVIDUAL interpretations precisely because they are inevitably argumentative and divisive.
When you give up the FREEDOM CHRIST died to give you to give you rest from the BURDEN LADERS you see what you hallucinate. You will see the CULT mentality of the COMMUNITY church which is modeled after the Wilderness Wandering where the EXODUS fad believes was PATTERNISTIC for church organization AND worship. Fact is, the clergy which had been TURNED OVER to worship the heavenly host performed the rituals. That quarantined THE CONGREGATION Outside the gates to the synagogue where singing and instruments were OUTLAWED. The READ or rehearsed the Word just as Paul defines WORSHIP: then, they went home without having to pay the ADDED BURDEN or TAX. They forget that JESUS PAID IT ALL.
Mike Armour at Riverside About two weeks back, we talked about God calling us in community. We were talking about the principle of trust – that glue that holds community together.
"You show me yours and I will show you mine." This is part of the SHEPHERDING or Discipling Dilemma where you must TRUST the community with all of your secrets which WILL be used against you. Lynn Anderson confesses to the Promise Keepers (Crossroads) where you are discipled about your FINANCES and SEXUAL thoughts during the week. The SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE or Synagogue GATHERED ITSELF together to study the Bible and pray. By the very definition of ekklesia, when the ASSEMBLY disbanded it ceased to be an assembly. School was out and one's private life or diverse opinions were not subject of DOUBTFUL DISPUTATIONS or dialog by any ON THE DOLE clergy person or SHEPHERD.
Mike Armour But we noted that throughout history, God has called his people, not as individuals, but as individuals within community with responsibility to the community, which we reminded ourselves of just a few moments ago when we partook of the communion,
This group often calls it Holy Communion meaning Eucharist The Lord's Supper is a PREACHING or TEACHING activity to show forth the DEATH of Christ. How can a GROUP MENTALITY discern the Body of Christ or remember?
God called Abraham OUT of his community religious system which was the PATTERNISM for many national religions to be repeated in the end times according to Revelation 18.
God called Moses to lead the people OUT of pagan Egypt.
Mt.11:28 Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Romans 14:12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
2 Co.6:17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,
Re.18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
2Th.3:12 Now them that are such we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread.
Paul was speaking specifically to the MANY who should not be fed if THEY WILL NOT WORK. Paul laid it down as an EXAMPLE and a DIRECT COMMAND that the only way the FREE GOSPEL can have credibility will be by the LIVING STONES giving away and not PEDDLING RETAIL which defines those who CORRUPT the Word:
Mike Armour which is a reaffirmation of our covenant relationship with God and a reaffirmation of our covenant relationship with one another.
Within community, trust is vital because without trust, the community begins to become frayed.
What Paul wants us to understand is that God's having called us to community
means every decision I make, every action I take, every word I say needs to be run through the filter of "will this strengthen this community or will it weaken it? "
Heb.13:12 Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate.
Heb.13:13 Let us go forth therefore unto him without the camp, bearing his reproach.
It was prophesied of Christ that HE WILL NOT CRY OUT: that means that He will NEVER CALL AN ASSEMBLY and He never did.
The Greek word EKKLESIA was not a community or family: it was like a COUNTY COURT or a SCHOOL OF HOMER. The ekklesia had NO AUTHORITY to make up its own rules, change the laws or even PROPOSE that any law or tradition be changed. Synagogue is also a Greek word which "had no praise service" because even Moron Monty would gurgle if anyone began to SANG or wave their hands in the air. A more debating assembly was the SYLLAGOS. Jesus picked EKKLESIA and anyone who add music or performance preaching on the backs of people are a PAGAN TEMPLE girls and all.
When a RELIGIOUS FESTIVAL was held the WORSHIP LEADER was OBLIGATED to hire the musicians and singers and dancers and PURCHASE all of the food and pay ALL of the bills. Now, anyone who wants to get PAID would have been called a PARASITE:
Chorêg-ia , hê, A. office or lêitourgia [p. 1999] of a chorêgos, defraying of the cost of the public choruses,
Well, these people have NO ekklesia or church of Christ DNA so they might as well grasp that Christ has removed His candlestick letting them be deluded into thinking they were doing FAMILY things being led by a FATHER. I noticed that we got us some free sking at Steam Boat Springs?
(no login) 72.150.118.137
“Farther from the truth”
January 16 2006, 9:24 PM
The entertaining drama!
Check this out. It is in the Madison Marcher (Vol. 55, No. 01, January 4, 2006). [I’m not sure whose picture it is on the second page of the man lifting up his “holy” hands. Not really surprising, since certain elders are setting examples of lifting and clapping “holy” hands in front of the assembly anyway. Uh-hmmm … it is no longer an issue in the contemporary gathering. No one is complaining; therefore, it is no longer an attention-getter. Hmmm … no longer it is offensive to anyone.]
Well, let’s not talk about clapping for now.
Here’s the article:
“It all started for me,” Mark Gage states, “when it was announced that the church was going to present a drama production based on the story ‘A Christmas Carol.’ I thought to myself, ‘I have never done this kind of thing before; it might be fun to try something new.’ I do not know why I thought that (others in the drama have said the same thing). My wife, Donna, e-mailed me the next day at work and asked if I had considered trying out. I told her yes, that I had considered the roll [sic] of Scrooge. I decided to give it a shot and called Kelly Hughes and scheduled an audition. The rest is history.
“What was first thought would merely be a fun experience, became a wonderful and powerful journey. The roll [sic] of Scrooge revealed to me attitudes, experiences, and people from my own past. I could have become like Scrooge had it not been for the grace of God. And, because of His everlasting love and faithfulness, I was in the Madison church family—included and loved as if . . . I had always been here.
“. . . We became a family; a united family that was blessed by and filled with the Holy Spirit to proclaim God’s message….” [Please see this link for the picture and the rest of the article: http://www.madisoncofc.org/Marcher/index.aspx ...]
And now … being “filled with the Holy Ghost” to proclaim God’s message? Is this the day of Pentecost all over again? Whoa!
But … it’s only a charismatic fad, isn’t it? Even the “shepherds’ prayers are filled with expressions such as, “May the Holy Spirit fill us and guide us … free us from sins,” etc. What about: “May the Holy Ghost [Holy Spirit] lead this church” … or a leader’s proclamation to the congregants that “miracles still happen today”—whatever THAT means.
What a charismatic experience this past Sunday! At the “Worship Leader’s” cue, there was [I thought what sounded like] congregational rhythmic clapping and hand-lifting and swaying to the moo-sic … in addition to the strong emphasis on the Holy Ghost. [Um … I am trying to make a point here regarding what church members really believe and know about God’s Spirit. Um … what would be the difference in a “regular” church member’s thinking in stating, “Holy Ghost, Breathe on Me” VERSUS “Holy Spirit, Breathe on Me”? Frankly, have you ever thought of it this way before? Huh?
Keith Lancaster, the Moo-sic “Worship” Leader, “led” the following as “invitation” songs:
“Holy Spirit [Ghost], Breathe On Me”
Holy Spirit, breathe on me.
Holy Spirit, let me see
. . . all the things You are,
. . . all the things You want me to be.
Holy Spirit, breathe on me.
[repeat above]
. . . all the things You are,
. . . all the things You want me to be.
Holy Spirit, breathe on me.
“Let Your Spirit Come”
Let Your Spirit come, fall upon me now;
Let Your Spirit come, fall upon me now
And let the rain fall down, pour upon my soul;
Come and wash me now, come and make me whole
Come and make me whole
Let Your Spirit come.
Oh, well, just some of the Charismatic Movement songs, in addition to: “Ain’t no rock … ain’t no bird … ain’t no tree”—a lot of clapping and swaying accompaniment as prompted and encouraged by the moo-sic man.
Lesson to learn here is this—John 14: “[16] And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; [17] Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he [Christ] dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. [18] I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.” And who was the “another Comforter” promised to His disciples according to this chapter?
Now … back to the drama production. What will the Christmas drama production be like next year?
Don’t forget about the upcoming “Easter Sunday” at Madison. I t will be here soon. Is there going to be another “interactive Easter drama worship”?
“Farther from the truth” … you say? In the same church bulletin issue, there’s an announcement regarding the “New Sunday Morning Class ‘Building a Graceful Marriage’” which began on January 8. I wonder if classes such as studies of “Ephesians … Galatians … Hebrews …” are still taught in churches these days? Or, they, too, have been “taken over” by social and psychology classes [with occasional mention of scriptural references]?
Donnie
Concerned Christian (no login) 68.109.216.196
Re: “Farther from the truth”
January 18 2006, 11:32 PM
It is so good that God has you and others associated with this web-site to help Him know who is following every rule and regulation. It is no wonder why the Church of Christ is dying.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.164.97
Dying?
January 19 2006, 3:06 PM
It may surprise detractors to know that the church of Christ is neither dead nor dying. The church that Christ founded through His own death, burial, and resurrection (appropriately known as the “church of Christ”), the pattern for which is outlined in the New Testament, is alive and quite well, despite the efforts of many to overthrow it or replace it with something “modern” and “cool.” Though tens of thousands may forsake the simplicity of the church of Christ for the glitz, glamour, entertainment, and user-friendly (easy) religion by which the denominations lure their converts, the church of Christ will forever remain spiritually pure. The church of Christ does not waver from the eternal principles as stipulated in the New Testament, no matter how “out of touch with the times” those in rebellion against Christ claim those principles are. The church of Christ is neither based on the worldly principle of “bigger is better” nor on “the larger the numbers, the more relevant is the church.” That is, the true church of Christ is neither founded nor based on the quantity of its members. The concept of “quantity” is worldly. The true church of Christ is comprised of members who manifest spiritual quality, who are willing to take the New Testament at face value and gladly follow it to the letter without complaint.
Which church is more pleasing to God: a 50-member church of Christ that earnestly strives to obey the NT to the letter in all things, or a 5,000,000-member denomination bent on keeping its members by doing all it can to make the church more attractive and appealing to the world? (Romans 12:2, James 4:4, 1 John 2:15-17 KJV)
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Dying
January 20 2006, 9:32 AM
...and Autonomous. The arguments I hear on this web-site remind me of the Pharisee's that Jesus dealt with...Dogmatic, No Grace, My Way or the Highway. This is all about Hermenutic (the Church of Christ)and your intepretation of the Bible. I grew up in the Church of Christ and the reason people are leaving is not because of instrument issues or 3 songs and a prayer, it is becuase Grace is non existent in our attitudes. We have certain checklist and if we don't get it checked off then we are coming up short. We must stop from hiding behind signs that indicate who I am or they are and start hiding behind the cross. The spiritual renewal in America is exciting and people are doing more than punching time cards in the foyer of their buildings.
I guess that people that go to Madison, Richland Hills or any of the other churches you keep up with are on fire for hell. They just can't wait to get there and look forward to punching their ticket every chance they can get. I know some very Godly people at these churches and it is frankly offensive that your website spreads this garbage.
Oh yeah, did I mention the autonomous thing. Did not want to forget that.
(no login) 64.185.31.125
Life Support
January 20 2006, 11:35 AM
Dr. Crump, on your last posting, you said some people want to replace the church with something "modern and cool" as if that were bad. What do you think Jesus did? He replaced the Pharisee's church that obeyed God "to the letter" (your words), with something modern AND cool.
That's why they gained so many converts. And yes, several times in Acts, Luke counts how many people were there, because QUANTITY does matter. That's the reason the great commission exists. To gain quantity AND quality. (baptize, teach, AND make disciples)Christians who say things like "Quality is what matters, God does not care about numbers" are people who go to small churches and need to relieve their guilt for not being evangelistic.
Yes, there is a prevalent belief that "the larger the numbers, the more rlevant the church". That's because it's TRUE! Why do you think Jesus told parables? Because being relevant to people is how you initially reach them. It is not only good for a church to be relevant to it's surrounding culture, it's sinful for it NOT to be. Jesus didn't draw people to himself by lining up hoops for them to jump through. Think about it. He just loved them.
I agree, The church of Christ is not dying. The body of believers who claim Jesus as Savior is actually thriving more than it has in decades. However, Christians who meet in buildings with the name church (or Church if you prefer the capital "C") of Christ really is on life support. It's sad to me because I grew up in that tradition. My family is still in it, but the numbers are really declining. The reason it's sad is because they have refused to become relevant, and lose the Pharisee mindset. There are great people in that tradition, but many are leaving.
I went to a Chruch of Christ college. I am not exaggerating, around half the people I graduated with don't attend a "church of Christ". They have moved to churches (like Saddleback who is slaughtered on this site regularly) that stand on Biblical absolutes and theology, are flexible on matters of opinion and doctrine, and follow the 2 greatest commands- #1 Love God with all your heart, #2 Love people more than yourself. If I'm not mistaken, Jesus seemed to think that those 2 things pretty well covered you.
Concerned Christian had a good point. They are not doing their best to get to Hell. They want people to see what Jesus did for them, believe it, and embrace it. I hope that's what you want. If so, stop treating other denominations like an enemy and let's go save some souls!
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.69.208
Replacements
January 21 2006, 10:09 AM
Amazed makes it sound like following Christ’s commandments is odious, cumbersome, and boring. Say the words "obedience" and "commandments," and people instead hear "Pharisee" and "legalism."
Christ replaced the cumbersome Mosaic Law, a law comprised of seemingly unending rules and regulations, with the Gospel of grace. We may be free from the Law of Moses, but we are still under a “Law,” the Law of Christ. Keeping commandments did not vanish with grace. Christ laid down specific commandments which must be followed for us to stay within His good grace. Those commandments are the New Testament. Christ never said that once people are “saved,” then they are free to do whatever they please. The NT more than once admonishes us to keep the commandments of Christ, as in John 14:15 and 1 John 5:1-5 (both KJV), for example. Both examples also admonish that obedience to Christ is to be done out of love. Furthermore, we are assured that obeying the commands of God/Christ is (or should be) enjoyable, for His commands are “not grievous” (1 John 5:3). However, those in rebellion against Christ would undoubtedly find His commands as odious, cumbersome, and boring, and would seek ways to alter them or ignore them through change.
Speaking of change, Amazed is certainly correct that it was Christ, not other men, who personally restructured the church of the Pharisees. Therefore, if the church that Christ founded with His own death, burial, and resurrection is imperfect and in such dire need of restructuring again, as the Change Movement seems to believe, then let no one step in to replace Christ—for only He has the absolute authority to change that which He instituted.
Concerned Christian (no login) 68.109.216.196
Replacements
January 21 2006, 7:44 PM
Dr. Crump,
One of the interesting points to all this is that we are talking about Christ and His saving grace. In the Book "The Purpose Driven Church", Rick Warren comments that the message of Jesus has not changed, it's the methods in which they are taught must change. What is wrong with that? Utilizing current methods to spread the message of Jesus is a must. For example, Flannel Boards was a method used when I was a kid, but that has no real meaning to kids today. Today kids are given the opportunity to learn by watching a video or something else Modern and New. I have taught many classes at church and camp and have utilized the opportunity to teach with modern tools. Being able to communicate in a way they understand while tying Jesus to it is awesome!
We are still in the reformation and the 1950’s church (A Type of Method/Same Message) did not arrive and have it all figured out. Do you honestly think that the methods you use today are the same as Christ used? If you are honest with yourself you would have to say no. However, the message (I hope) is the same. If you go into a church of Christ in ABC or XYZ their methods of presenting Jesus may be different, but they still have the same goal, Heaven! I used to think just like what this web site says, but that was when I was a kid. I majored in Bible and am just amazed that so many hang onto traditions and speak from an area of authority that frankly sounds like elementary Christianity.
I guess calling Keith Lancaster a “Moo-sic” Minister on the previous thread is Love? And if this is the type of “Love” you are talking about it is no wonder why the c of c fellowship is declining in membership. In fact, my father (Who has a Doctorate in Ministry not Medicine) who preached in the c of c for 32 years got so disgusted with putting out fires of “elementary” arguments around the church and community that he gave it up.
I need to ask, because nearly this entire web site is concerned with what goes on at a building from 10-12 AM and 6-7 PM on a Sunday and of course Wednesday…Do you believe God has a checklist and sits in Heaven every Sunday (and Wednesday) and goes over the “do’s and don’ts or is it possible that He is more concerned with how you live your life following the Greatest Command, Love; and how you treat your fellow man? These “Change Agents” as you call us love the Lord and want to do what is right, and frankly it is so funny how you think we are all out of line. Going to church should be a time of praise and worship with other Christians and I don’t believe God has such a low self esteem that He needs us to show up and make Himself feel better.
Legalistic ugliness is not the answer. Christ’s commands are simple. Go ahead and reread the “Sermon on the Mount” and you will see what a Christian is to be like.
Whether one agrees with what they do at Madison or not is none of yours or concerned members business. How does this affect your life or eternity in any way?
Oh yeah, did I mention Autonomous in a previous thread.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.164.141
RE: Replacements (by Concerned Christian)
January 21 2006, 10:57 PM
Concerned Christian is unwise to bring up the Purpose Driven materials (PDC and PDL), for they contain a number of theological fallacies. And why quote from the PDC or PDL in the first place? The New Testament is the ultimate authority. But having read both the PDC and the PDL, I'll present just one fallacious example (interested readers can find scores of Internet articles which provide critical analyses that expose the Purpose Driven scheme for what it is).
The PDL asserts that it is our love, not our doctrinal beliefs, which is our greatest witness to the world. This refers to John 13:35, which reads in the KJV:
"By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another."
Jesus neither mentions doctrinal beliefs in this verse nor downplays them, yet the PDL does just that. The undiscerning who read the PDL would get the impression that Jesus emphasizes love while downplaying doctrinal beliefs; this is false theology. And that is what the Change Movement does--change the New Testament to fit man's preferences. Fundamental or strict doctrinal belief is odious and legalistic to the Purpose Driven concept, which gives a nod to alternative philosophies, opinions, and interpretations other than those expressly written in the New Testament. Only "love" matters; all else is "disputable," including doctrinal beliefs.
No one should follow anyone who espouses fallacious theology like that. Follow the New Testament closely; you can't go wrong in that direction.
(no login) 4.153.69.42
Steelers for Christ
January 22 2006, 12:05 AM
Dr. Crump you may be Dr. Grump!
You know what it says in Judas 69:666
"If you see a good church already set up and paid for then
Steal a good church for JeeeZeus Today, don't delay, crime DO pay."
Concerned Christian (no login) 68.109.216.196
PDL PDC
January 22 2006, 2:43 AM
"Concerned Christian is unwise to bring up the Purpose Driven materials (PDC and PDL), for they contain a number of theological fallacies." Yet your cut and paste thread says, “Read this book as you would eat fish. Keep the good thoughts but spit out the dangerous bones.”
I did not quote the entire book. I did however make a comment about approaches to spreading the message, which was my point. It goes back to tradition and Hermeneutic. You believe what you believe because of how you interpret the Bible and most likely how you were raised. I understand because I was probably just like you in most ways. Once again we did not arrive in the 1950's and have it all figured out. I don't remember hearing the announcement that the Reformation has now ended.
I too clinged on to the interpretations that the c of c taught and then I majored in Bible (yes the Bible) and realized there was much room for learning when it pertains to a lot of things that is taught in our fellowship. Examples; your belief in the role of Women is totally different than mine and musical instruments is another. (I know you are thinking of a thread somewhere in concerned members that you can cut and paste into this area for my correction) Where you believe it is law, I see culture and preference, not a Heaven and Hell issue. Getting in and understanding the Culture of whom Paul is writing to, makes all the difference in the world. Check into how women were treated in that culture and why they were not allowed to speak, instead of depending on the Hermeneutic of the c of c. You believe silence means no area for discussion. I believe that God gives you the ability to be flexible while spreading the message of Jesus. You feel that people are tickling ears (most likely), but scaring the heck out of people breeds fear instead of grace and love.
Once again the message is Jesus and His saving grace. I continue to grow and learn each and everyday and praise God for His Son.
Have you ever checked out www.freedomsring.org? It is a great awakening to understanding the Freedom that Christ brought to the World of believers. Being Free in Christ is not saying anything goes, but helping people realize that you can gain perfection through Christ and His Grace. I am a sinner, but realize through grace and the Love of God that I am saved.
(no login) 65.1.219.156
From “Timeline” (7th Archive): “Purpose Driven Church”
January 21 2006, 11:36 PM
Your post from the previous thread is being transferred here.
There was a report on 2/23/2004 concerning the “27th Ladies Renewal” scheduled for April 16th and 17th last year. The advertisement in the Madison Marcher mentioned this manual to be used—“The Purpose Driven Life” … that “we will use the book by Rick Warren as we study God’s Word.”
In the same report, John Waddey (editor of the online “Christianity: Then and Now”) had this to say:
“This book was written by Rick Warren, pastor of the famous Saddleback Church of Lake Forest, CA. It is described as a forty day spiritual journey that will help the readers find the answer to "What Am I Here For?" Warren is the dynamic and successful leader of a mega "Community Church" which has become the role model for many of our churches. …
“Unfortunately, as is generally true of denominational material, there is a generous sprinkling of error scattered throughout the book that can easily lead the unsuspecting novice astray. For example:
Warren espouses an extreme kind of Calvinistic predestination. "God prescribed every single detail of your body…
He writes, "God won't ask about your religious background or doctrinal views…
"Real life begins by committing yourself completely to Jesus Christ...all you need to do is receive and believe" (p. 58)…
"I invite you to bow your head and quietly whisper the prayer that will change your eternity: ‘Jesus, I believe in you and I receive you'...welcome to the family of God" (p. 58). (This prayer is not found in Scripture).
"Baptism doesn't make you a member of God's family, only faith in Christ does that" (p.120)…
"God loves all kinds of music because he invented it all" (p. 65)…
…
“Some of our promoters of change are using this book for Bible class material. … Many students, being spiritual novices and deficient in Biblical knowledge, will never recognize the poisonous error mingled in the pages of this book.
“As a general rule it is a mistake to use denominational literature in church Bible classes. … This leaves novice class members open to accept what is taught, not suspecting the danger involved. In the hands of a teacher whose faith is weak or shaky, errors common to such literature will likely be passed on without exposure….
“Read this book as you would eat fish. Keep the good thoughts but spit out the dangerous bones.”
—————————————
For the entire article, please go to this thread: THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE: Personal Guide or Bible Class Study?
—————————————
Then, Fred H. Lackner responded as follows:
“Hi, the link to the complete article is not operative. I would like to read it in its' entirity. Thank you. Fred”
And … here’s your response to Fred’s post … being transferred here:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Concerned Christian (no login) 68.109.216.196 January 21 2006, 7:48 PM
—————————————
A great Book! It brought me closer to God than Before. Thanks for the recommendation!
By the way (I am Guessing) the prayers you pray are not in your Bible, but God allows them. Be careful of your "judgemental" comments they could come back on you.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.66.104
Message and Methods
January 22 2006, 12:49 AM
Concerned Christian referred to the PDC, which implies that although Christ’s message has not changed, the methods to present the message must change with society and culture. In Christ’s day, the “method” was simply to preach the Gospel to those who would listen and accept it. That method still applies even today, regardless of the society or culture. Christ used no show-biz gimmicks, no contemporary music bands with a heavy beat, no performers belting out emotional songs to boost adrenalin highs, no comedy routines, and no drama with state-of-the art sound and light equipment to get folks “interested.” Equivalent forms of entertainment were certainly available to Jesus for the times, but Jesus never used them to augment His message. However, some would argue, “Yes, Jesus did participate in drama by performing miracles to get the attention of his audience.” Jesus’ miracles were the proof of His divinity and were hardly side-show spectacles. It especially irked Jesus when people pressed Him for a “sign” (miracle), and he rebuked those so inclined, for he knew their intent was to tempt Him or to seek some entertainment:
“Then certain of the scribes and Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas” (Matt. 12:39 KJV).
We need to remember that elaborate, worldly, culture-driven “methods” that go far beyond plainly and simply presenting the basic message of Christ’s Gospel will not add one soul to Christ’s church:
“No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day. It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me” (John 6:44-45 KJV).
Complex, expensive, culture-driven schemes and techniques are not only a complete waste of time, the New Testament does not authorize them. Only the power of the Gospel can bring souls to Christ. The simple Gospel is enough to those whose hearts are truly receptive.
Concerned Christian (no login) 68.109.216.196
Internet Usage for this Web site Authorized or Not Authorized???
January 22 2006, 2:49 AM
I don't believe the internet was authorized in the Bible, but I'll keep looking.
What better was is there to go into all the world than the WWW?
It is also interesting that the WWW came into existance at the esact time time when we are seeing a major falling away in the churches; something to think about!
Concerned Christian (no login) 68.109.216.196
Re: Internet Usage for this Web site Authorized or Not Authorized???
January 23 2006, 1:07 AM
Just to clarify I was being sarcastic.
It is funny how some perceive that there was/is a falling away of the church instead of the reform continuing.
If you honestly think that the way we sit in pews on Sunday's and Wednesday's and stare at peoples medulla's is exactly like the early church then we have obviously not been looking at what the church was like.
(no login) 65.1.222.229
"Like the early church"
January 23 2006, 3:13 AM
Hmmm . . . “like the early church.” That’s exactly our point! Moo-sical worship was not the purpose of the gathering of the saints in the first century. The assembly was a school in which the study of God’s Word was the emphasis—and it was not a musical performance and entertainment center. The disciples gathered to learn about the doctrine of Christ and the teachings of the apostles so that they, too, could teach others the good news of salvation. They met to commemorate the Lord’s suffering and death on the cross. That simple….
From reading your posts, it appears that the church you grew up in is now history to you. You have openly despised and derided it. You have spoken negatively against it. You even claim [and I have yet to figure out how you were able to arrive at the notion] that the church is dying.
Dying? We can only assume that you are no longer a member of this dying church, can we not? And if that’s the case, can we assume that you now belong to a church similar to the Saddleback Community Church?
Too, you’re defending Rick Warren’s theology—his church growth scheme in the “Purpose Driven Church” manual.
And “The Purpose Driven Life.” But here’s John Waddey’s advice—
“Read this book as you would eat fish. Keep the good thoughts but spit out the dangerous bones.”
Certainly a great advice!
Donnie
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: Like the Early Church
January 23 2006, 2:47 PM
Are you saying they sat in Church buildings and the teacher of this study in the early church said, "Let's all turn over in our Bible to I Corinthians Chapter 5. Our Study this Morning will be about..." It is your opinion on what they did when they got together. In some areas of the New Testament they ate a meal together, in other areas that had a prayer meeting. Some people need to have their sprits filled through the surrounding power of the Holy Spirit in different ways. You and your Pattern of thoughts is not the only way. (I know you are thinking of particular verses you can quote to me) Remember no one is trying to destroy the message it is just the approaches to spreading the message that is important. Your (Donnie) particular preference style at XYZ church may be different from other churches. (I should have said Scriptural Style, because you and I obviously disagree)
The church is not dying, so please do not misunderstand me...the church of Christ denomination is dying. The declining attendance is one clear statistic that a person can look at. The reason the c o c address book is growing, is because of the splits that are going on. It is not because 1000,s are being baptized every year. Since you asked, let me make it clear the kind of church of Christ I grew up in is History to me. I don't despise it, I just can't understand how the elementary arguments that you and others make are something you still cling onto.
This Holy Entertainment you talk about is ludicrous. If the preacher is not entertaining in his approach he most likely is not allowed to stay around for too long. You talk about solos, I guess when someone gets up to lead a prayer it is OK, but when someone puts music to words it is sin. (I am cracking up right now as I type this.)
Thanks for the advice on John Waddey's approach. Some 51 souls are at his congregation (according to the C of C's in the US 2003 manual) and at the Saddleback style they are bringing in 1000,s. Making disciples of all nations is what I read. As Max Lucado writes, and I am paraphrasing, "Jesus will accept you just as you are; let Him change you into what He wants." What is wrong with that?
The stuff I read on this web site reminds me of businesses that have lost their edge in the corporate world. They forget that change is inevitable. While their product remains the same, it is the way in which they market what they have that reaches people.
Amazed (no login) 64.185.31.125
splitting hairs
January 23 2006, 3:51 PM
Dr. Crump, you said, "Christ laid down specific commandments which must be followed for us to stay within His good grace. Those commandments are the New Testament." That is just incorrect. If you mis-spoke, forgive me, but though there are commandments IN the New Testament, the NT itself is not OUR COMMANDMENT HANDBOOK.
Also, saying that Jesus did not use "modern" approaches is also a fallacy. You said, "In Christ’s day, the “method” was simply to preach the Gospel to those who would listen and accept it." If only. When a woman was drug to him caught in adultery, did he "simply preach the gospel"? No, he bent down and wrote in the sand.
If simply preaching the gospel were the only thing needed to reach people, why did he bother using parables?
When a woman washed his feet with her tears, why didn't he simply preach the gospel at her?
When money changers were ripping people off in the temple, I wonder what Jesus was thinking by not simply preaching the gospel?
I guess he forgot to use his own "method". None of the things I listed are miracles, but they were interesting, new, relevant ways to share his hope. If we aren't being successful in evangelism, we should have the integrity to re-examine our method, and not blame it on the world, or "change-angents" or secret agents, or real-estate agents. Yes, it does require a degree of humility and courage.
Some other responses:
Ken, I have no idea what you're talking about, but it's funny.
Donnie, you said the early church was a school where the primary reason for meeting was to learn scripture. Might want to re-read the NT.
Later, you DID say they met to commemorate Jesus and His sacrifice. you're getting there.
Last thing: Concerned Christian might not get very far quoting Rick Warren to a conservative crowd, but the same applies quoting John Waddey to a change agent. I just don't think the credibility is there.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.71.54
RE: Splitting Hairs
January 23 2006, 9:02 PM
Amazed: Dr. Crump, you said, "Christ laid down specific commandments which must be followed for us to stay within His good grace. Those commandments are the New Testament." That is just incorrect. If you mis-spoke, forgive me, but though there are commandments IN the New Testament, the NT itself is not OUR COMMANDMENT HANDBOOK.
Dr. Crump: Amazed seems confused. S/he first admits that the NT contains the commandments of Christ, then s/he seems to deny that the NT provides the guidelines for us to follow in the form of those commandments. Which is it? This is like one misguided soul who split hairs by implying that the "Word made flesh" (Christ) and the "Word" (the NT) were mutually exclusive; he acknowledged the former but had little time for the latter. Doesn't Amazed WANT to follow Christ as closely as possible? The way to follow Christ is to read and study the NT, and DO what Christ bids us to do therein, adding nothing to the NT, taking nothing from the NT. Plain and simple.
Parables. Christ used parables to teach His audience about the Kingdom of God and NOT as a means of entertaining them. But it seems that Amazed is trying to justify the use of rock and roll music, comedy routines, jokes and anecdotes, show-biz techniques, and the like (all of which the Change Movement believes are necessary to "reach" people) solely on the fact that Christ used parables. This is such an incredible stretch that the "analogy" completely shatters! As I stated before, Christ had the worldly accoutrements of His day available to Him, and He could have used them ALL. Instead, He chose to teach via simple parables, NOT via rollicking music of the times, NOT via uproarious comedy, NOT via colorful/controversial jokes and snickering, and NOT with costly dramatical staging and costuming with trained actors. Christ rejected all this other garbage, because the Gospel is NOT based on entertainment.
The "argument" Amazed posed about Jesus and the moneychangers is interesting. Why didn't Jesus preach the Gospel to them? Being a merciful man, He may have done so before He took action, to give them the benefit of the doubt, but the NT doesn't say so. Instead, Jesus thought it better to cast out of His Father's house those ungodly people who were corrupting it. Which is what every church should be doing with change agents and those who would corrupt the Gospel and the church by espousing the man-contrived, worldly philosophy of the Change Movement.
Amazed: Concerned Christian might not get very far quoting Rick Warren to a conservative crowd, but the same applies quoting John Waddey to a change agent. I just don't think the credibility is there.
Dr. Crump: Amazed doesn't "think" Waddey's credibility is there. Amazed should be be more "certain." Since this web site, through its articles and links, has shown that Rick Warren is not credible, let Amazed likewise present conclusive evidence that John Waddey is not credible.
(no login) 4.152.81.25
Outer Net
January 23 2006, 9:45 PM
Jesus actually invented the Outer Net: he said GO into all the WORLD and preach the Gospel.
Mt.13:47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind: [gathered is syagogue--not worship centered or self centered]
It happens way too often to me: My net breaketh but not as often with a MAC.
Lu.5:6 And when they had this done, they inclosed [embraced to put under subjection] a great multitude of fishes: and their net brake.[probably suckers]
Jesus knew that the LEFT SIDE had chased away all of the good fish so He issued a DIRECT COMMAND to look for GREAT fish who had not been COMMUNED.
Jn.21:6 And he said unto them, Cast the net on the RIGHT side of the ship, and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes.
Jn.21:11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.
Did you knot that GnawBone the Piltdown knew what the Mormons have discovered: if a TRIBE gets above about 150, people quit working, you develop SKILLED prophets whom H. Bamford Parks says are "emotionally or sexually abnormal" to CAST VISIONS and all kinds of Discord. The Mormons build a new building about 125 move when the number reaches about 250. It is pretty hard to hold SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE and have dedicated MINISTERS working--as Paul commanded Timothy who was NOT a located Missionary--so that he could sponsor the Agape and feed the POOR rather than BEING fed by the poor.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.70.67
Re: Internet Usage for this Web site Authorized or Not Authorized???
January 23 2006, 10:49 AM
Concerned Christian stated that the New Testament does not “authorize” the use of the Internet as a means of spreading the Gospel. Of course, s/he admitted to being sarcastic.
Actually, there is NT authority for the Internet by the “law of exclusion” (and for those bent out of shape by that term, there’s a whole thread devoted to it on the Sunday School in Exile pages—take your gripes there). The Great Commission states, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations…” (Matt. 28:19 KJV). Christ said to “Go” spread the Gospel. Since He did not specify how to do it, He gave us that “freedom.” If Christ had said, “Spread the Gospel only by word of mouth, not by written letter or mechanical means,” then we would have been limited in what media we could use to spread the Gospel. The apostolic epistles could not have been written. The NT does not exclude any media for spreading the Gospel, provided we do not compromise the Gospel in the process. Thus lies the NT authority to use the Internet or any other appropriate media.
Media and methods are two different things. “Media” are the available means of spreading the Gospel: word of mouth, written letter, printed material, radio, television, Internet, etc. “Methods” determine the manner in which the Gospel is presented to audiences. The simplest and most direct method, of course, is preaching--“This is what the NT says”; “The NT specifies thus and so”; “Thus saith the Lord.” The popular “methods” espoused by the Change Movement, such as raucous contemporary music, performers with show-biz routines, comedy, and drama all interject the concept of theater and worldly entertainment into the Gospel and pollute it. Such “methods” make the Church mirror the activities of the world. The Church must be spiritually separate from the world (Romans 12:2; James 4:4; 1 John 2:15-17 KJV—I’ll keep referring to those verses as often as it takes for their Truth to sink in).
As I stated in an earlier post, popular, entertaining “methods” were certainly available for Christ to use in His day. He rejected them and preached the Gospel. We should do the same.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: Internet Usage for this Web site Authorized or Not Authorized???
January 23 2006, 6:10 PM
Sorry it’s not sinking in...Apparently you or anyone like Donnie or Kent etc. don't support VBS, Sunday School, or Church Camps, because these are the very reasons "Change Agents" (as you call us) have come upon you so quickly and out of nowhere. (Change agents have been around forever.) VBS, Sunday School, and Camps where new means of communicating the message (different method)to us as children. As we grew up we saw that there were continuously new ways to being innovative in our approach. Some just make getting to Heaven and Jesus a little harder than others. Jesus is readily available and "jumping through hoops" as Amazed mentioned, is a certain type of Christianity (Method) that I am happy to leave in my rear view mirror rather than having it plastered on my windshield.
Sunday School is another method that was produced and we stole it from the Presbyterians...Oh My Goodness! "In October 1811, Presbyterian missionary Robert May opened an evening Sunday school in Philadelphia in which, unlike previous free schools, he taught religious doctrine solely and without remuneration." http://www.thewordsofeternallife.com/sunday_school.html This was a new method "introduced" and we are using it today. No where in your NT is it "authorized" to have "Sunday School." If you do agree to having Sunday School then you are a "Change Agent", in the eyes of the Anti-Sunday School church of Christ members. You "Concerned Member" Dr. Crump are causing division among these fellow brothers if you continue to think this way. See how ridiculous this sounds...it is the same thing you say over and over again.
"The message of Jesus has not changed, it's the methods in which they are taught that must change." What is the Message? That Jesus saves! How you get that out to people depends upon culture and the type of people you are dealing with.
Besides I like the word "Teach" rather than "Preach" it is so B.C.
It’s still not sinking in...
(no login) 4.152.81.25
Jesuf founded the Sunday School
January 23 2006, 9:20 PM
God founded the Sabbath School called REST and never worship. The term Holy Convocation means to Read and Rehearse the Word. A literate elder would be trained in the oral tradition, could go to the leaders meetings to LEARN Scripture and REHEARSE it word for word.
This Sabbath School or Qahal or synagogue or "church in the wilderness" was for the people's "congregation" and REST quarantined them from the "national" or Babylonian "worship services" held on the Sabbath along with the Tithe which originated in Babylon. God, Moses and John Calvin outlawed any loud instruments and "making a joyful noise before the Lord" because this was the Warrior's Panic Noise and not called MUSIC.
Christians met on the Lord's day because the THREAT was from Sun worship which was the offending "worship" in the Greek-Roman world.
Ekklesia or Synagogue means School of the Bible. T. Campbell called it A School of Christ where everyone should become a learned scholar.
The church divided over the Society's effort to impose Sunday School with literature and control from the Society separate and apart from the local eldership. Before that time, everyone went to SUNDAY SCHOOL under one teacher. I am sure that is why men matured at 16 and not at 36 if ever for being under bondage to the Women's Sunday School.
The Sunday School System has been the death of patriarchal religion under Father and Son and now under Mother and Daughter. The changeling-hirelings have NOTHING new: it was stolen from the Towers of Babbling.
Jesus says of the twos and threes under the laded burden of "spiritual anxiety created by religious rituals" and ADDED TAXES NOT IN WARTIME, to "come learn of me" and Paul said "outside the camp" or the massed, mad multitudes. Paul commanded that we teach ONE ANOTHER by speaking THAT WHICH IS WRITTEN which RADICALLY OUTLAWS some RIDING while others WALK: God did not create widows and hard working honest people to be fitted with a SADDLE and BITS. Tell them: "Don't go away MAD, just go away and get OFF our backs and OUT of our skimpy budget." Jesus will judge the Diotrephes (Zeus or JeZeus worshipers) and the Barren Robbers.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.125.116
Not Sinking In
January 23 2006, 9:44 PM
How shall I put this? Ah, I have it: Quoting Rick Warren or any of the unbiblical philosophies of the Change Movement won’t sink in with the conservative folks at Concerned Members, because we are interested in promoting biblical Truth. Likewise, presenting biblical Truth or quoting Scripture in context to change agents or anyone else espousing the Change Movement is absolutely futile, because that biblical Truth JUST WON’T SINK IN!
Amazed (no login) 64.185.31.125
No need to get ugly
January 24 2006, 11:17 AM
Dr. Crump, I know that people you call "change agents" (you really need to come up with a new name- what "agency" do they work for?) frustrate you. I get that. However, I don't think you know the seriousness of accusing someone of not believing in, not obeying, or denying the Word of God or the divinity of Christ.
Just because someone does not agree with YOU or takes a different approach to reaching the lost, does not take away their Christianity. We love the Lord as much as you. We believe in the death, burial, and ressurrection as much as you. I think we can discuss differences without accusing one another of not being Christian. I think.
Having said that, I believe you have taken some things I said the wrong way. Of course the New Testament has commands in it. What I am saying, and I believe you would agree, is the WHOLE New Testament is not a command. The POINT of it's existence is not to be a rule book, but to tell the story of Jesus Christ, his teachings, (and yes, the commandments he has for us) and what He's done for us.
If you believe the ENTIRE NEW TESTAMENT is to be followed "to the letter", please tell me that you attend a congregation where all women cover their heads at all times. (I Cor. 11). What about I Cor. 7:6 when Paul says, "I say this as a concession, not as a command." If the whole NT IS a command, how do you explain that? Do you say, "The whole NT IS a command, EXCEPT I Cor. 7:1-5?" Remeber what Jesus said, Love God, Love others, everything else comes under these 2 commands. This is why legalism is KILLING the Church of Christ (denomination).
Ken Sublett, I liked your thoughts on the internet, but meaning no disrespect, I have no idea what you are talking about in your post titled, "Jesuf founded the Sunday School". By the way, ekklesia, DOES NOT mean School of the Bible.
One more thing, I was not calling John Waddey's faith into question, the point is, I don't agree with many of his opinions and his approach, so when you quote him to make a point to me, it doesn't mean anything.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.125.79
RE: Ugly
January 24 2006, 4:20 PM
Sometimes preaching biblical Truth greatly offends change agents. They see the Truth as "ugly" and those who proclaim it as "ugly." Does Amazed really think that finding a new name for change agents will further justify their wish to CHANGE and restructure the Church away from the New Testament pattern? A new name will not absolve them of the "ugly" motives of changing the Church to please man. They are CHANGE AGENTS, and Amazed knows that. It's "ugly" to admit it. Likewise, there's no need to come up with a new and improved name for the Church that Christ founded with His own death, burial, and resurrection. That name is "Church of Christ." That name is appropriately descriptive, just as "change agent" is appropriately descriptive.
Amazed (no login) 64.185.31.125
You missed it
January 24 2006, 5:49 PM
The name "change agent" was just a side note, (meant to be half-way humorous) but the only thing you chose to respond to in my whole posting. The point of calling them (or us) something besides "change agents" isn't for absolution against your accusations, I was just saying it's just kind of a dumb name. My opinion. Don't mean to offend. I will answer to change agent, change monger, change purse, loose change, or spare change. What you call me doesn't matter to me, I'm just trying to help you sound a little more intelligent and credible.
NOW- if you have a point concerning the nature of NT law, I'd love to hear it.
I would also love to hear an apology for accusing me of not following God or the scriptures.
I know what you're doing, you feel trapped and cornered, you see C of C numbers going down FAST, you know "WE" (the wicked World Organization for Church of Christ Control who has many "secret change agents" spread around the world) make some good points, but it just doesn't feel right to you. You feel like you need to fight us even though all we both want is to spread the Word. When you open your bag of weapons, the most potentially effective one you see is "Accuse them of not being TRUE Christians". According to John, Paul, and just about any other NT writer, there's not a worse thing you can do to another Christian. If you want to call me the anti-Christ, or a non-Christian, or anything else along those lines, go ahead, but you BETTER be right. because if you're not, that weapon will back-fire in a BAD way.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: No Need To Get Ugly
January 25 2006, 4:48 PM
Amazed brought up some excellent points. Please reply with some answers to these "Biblical" Truths. I want to hear them.
(If you believe the ENTIRE NEW TESTAMENT is to be followed "to the letter", please tell me that you attend a congregation where all women cover their heads at all times. (I Cor. 11). What about I Cor. 7:6 when Paul says, "I say this as a concession, not as a command." If the whole NT IS a command, how do you explain that? Do you say, "The whole NT IS a command, EXCEPT I Cor. 7:1-5?" Remember what Jesus said, Love God, Love others, everything else comes under these 2 commands.)
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: Sinking In
January 24 2006, 12:06 PM
Rick Warren, Max Lucado, Rubel Shelly, and all the other guy's you talk about are on fire for Hell. It is so great to see them dedicate their lives to Satan and his work. Do you hear yourself Concerned Memebers? Listen to how Ridiculous that sounds! By the way I hope Heaven isn't too crowded for you because you will be amazed to get there and see that you and all your buddy's did NOT have it all figured out, and that Christ' Grace extends beyond interpretation and yes, opinion.
Change is inevitable. Just as I said earlier you to are a "Change Agent" for allowing approaches like VBS, Sunday School and Church Camps to exist. Thanks for helping me change.
You see; we are saying the same things, such as "Jesus is the Way, that He wants everyone to come to know Him, that he wants unification," etc. etc. Concerned Members I don't believe you are going to Hell because you are doing the best you can just like other people out there. Let's stop this dividing wall of opinion and how you interpret scripture. You say stop quoting from Rick Warren or anyone else, take a look around your Library and tell me honestly if you have only your Bible on the shelf. If that is the case, I would be surprised.
Oh yeah, have you thanked God for the Catholic Church getting us through the "Dark Ages"? And Martin Luther being courageous enough to stand up for reform. Did you know that if it was not for Martin Luther or someone like him you would be a Catholic on fire for the Lord? Just not sure if you knew your history, because apparently this web site has no clue what went on from the year 313 to 1955.
Since you are on such a mission about bringing back the first century church, take a look at this research from James Rutz. It has so much insight to tradition and why you and I were raised to think a certain way. I dare say you, Dr. Crump wear a suit to church every Sunday??? If you want to know you why you do this, this book has extensive research for the basic reader to see why our churches do what they do and expect you to follow it to a "T".
The Open Church: How to Bring Back the Exciting Life of the 1st Century Church
by James H. Rutz
Once I thought that the church of Christ was proud of their autonomous heritage. I guess you "Changed" that too.
Autonomous (no login) 68.96.120.167
Re: Sinking in
January 24 2006, 11:19 PM
Amen!
Concerned Christian (no login) 68.109.216.196
Re: Sinking In
January 25 2006, 10:14 PM
Still waiting for a response.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: Sinking In
January 30 2006, 1:02 AM
Are any of you going to respond to the posting? I know you monitor the site.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.125.187
Still Missing It, Amazed Continues to Sink
January 25 2006, 10:51 AM
By continuing to support and defend Rick Warren’s Purpose Driven Paradigm (PDP), Amazed continues to sink in an unscriptural sea without a life jacket. Amazed vainly tried to justify Warren’s techniques to “reach” people, such as a host of worldly, show-biz accoutrements, on the basis that Jesus utilized parables. Quite a stretch! WAKE UP! Doesn’t Amazed know that Warren is even beginning to fall out of favor with some denominations? Of course conservative churches of Christ have repudiated the PDP from the beginning, but at least one denomination has also seen the light. From the Baptist Bulletin Sept. 2005: http://www.baptistbulletin.org/index.php?q=node/152
Denomination Repudiates Rick Warren and “Purpose-Driven” Teaching
“At its 69th General Synod, the Bible Presbyterian denomination urged congregations and ‘all believers of whatever denomination’ to fiercely repudiate and expose the ‘egregious error’ espoused by Rick Warren and other proponents of the ‘purpose-driven paradigm’ (PDP) of church growth, reported John T. Dyck, Assistant Clerk of Synod. The denomination cited several problems with the PDP: 1) The entire strategy is based upon the concept that unbelievers are seeking after God, in spite of the fact that the Bible could not be clearer to the contrary; 2) The PDP values the opinions of unbelievers more than the opinions of God as revealed in His Word, believing that “felt needs” should dictate what is said from the pulpit; 3) The PDP asserts that Christians must think like non-Christians to reach them; 4) The PDP believes God is not concerned with the manner of His creatures’ entering into His presence; 5) The PDP misunderstands the nature of the church, ignoring the Biblical teaching that the institution and worship of the church exists for the glorification of God Himself and the edification of believers.”
The complete Bible Presbyterian Resolution 69:13, which provides more detailed, biblical justifications for rejecting the Purpose Driven Paradigm, may be found at http://bpc.org/synod/2005/069_13.html.
Hopefully, more and more churches and people like Amazed will finally WAKE UP and see the PDP for its "egregious error."
Amazed (no login) 64.185.31.125
Floating back to the top
January 25 2006, 12:05 PM
I’m not Baptist or Presbyterian, so their view of Rick Warren and Saddleback doesn’t mean a lot to me. What I do know, is Christians, God bless them, are some of the most self-destructive people on the planet. Anyone who has success reaching lost people, MUST be doing something ungodly. Thank God for people like the ones at this site who can police that for God and protect Him from His own people. What would He do without you?
And those preachers or evangelists who love God so much and reach so many people that they begin to get national attention, LOOK OUT! (Exhibit A: Max Lucado). The C of C did a fine job alienating him.
I have said it before and stand by it. Little people in little churches from little denominations with little success in evangelism prefer to tear down those who are successful rather than learn from them, or work harder, or God forbid, CHANGE their unsuccessful approach.
(no login) 4.153.69.56
VOMITING in the Spirit? How about in the PEWS?
January 25 2006, 1:01 PM
Like the Jubilee, Promise Keepers and all "postmodern" cults well defined by Machiavelli and Hitler, you have to DECONSTRUCT the "old" system. Rubel Shelly calls the old Bible Based system "decadent and deleterious." For we without a PhDuh that means ROTTEN AND DESTRUCTIVE. If you read his material along with that of all of the other changelings like Lynn Anderson promoting "hope" through the old SHEPHERDING movement you will see that--just like a cuckoo clock--they pop out on the hour to tell you that the ANTI-instrumental churches of Christ invented things like Commands and Examples, opposition to instrumental music and bad breath. Like a drum beat it is drummed in with new style worship which is old style Babylonianism. Like Lucian of Alexander whom they use to prove instrumental music: "Just blow the flute and fleece the fatheads and simpleton." One of the lies is: YOU ARE SHRINKING. Nah, nah, nah "IF you keep on NOT using instruments which you have NEVER used the other children will not LIKE you." So Hiterlian.
The DECONSTRUCT which they equate to SCHIZOPHRENIA is ro RECONSTRUCT you in the image of the LATTER RAIN (new wineskins, etal).
Rutz says--for consumption by the fools and AGENTS--:
"For reasons we know only in part, God has handed down a somewhat revised set of rules, delegating greater authority to more people. He has apparently decreed that plain folks like you and me are now a central part of an accelerated plan for a total transformation of the world.
The plan--just like Hitler defines in Mein Kampf--is is to create clusters of fanatics called "totally committeds" as the intellectual leadership which will MOBILIZE the Human Material. Like the Missional Church which replaced the now-defeated by some of your worst enemies on this forum--follows the Shelly Located Missionary thesis probably ditto headed from others--to restore Apostles, Prophets and then "HUMAN MATERIAL" which includes the elders and the masses.
These people worship Novensiles--the God of Newness:
The New Apostolic Reformation just hates the ONCE FOR ALL DELIVERED TO THE SAINTS Word of God with the THREAT by Peter than anyone who does not teach it is MARKED as a false prophet. Not to worry, in the words of Paul: "fools love to be fooled.
He calls them "core apostolics" – or "the new saints who are at the heart of the mushrooming kingdom of God. Megashift" attempts to document myriad healings and other powerful answers to the sincere prayers of this new category of believer, including, believe it or not, hundreds of dramatic cases of resurrections – not near-death experiences, but real resurrections of actual corpses.
Rutz The long tides of history have produced many slow shifts toward the good. For instance, the four waves of the Great Awakening, starting with the Moravians and the Wesleys, awoke the West from its 1,500-year Big Sleep, stopped the hate-driven surge of the French Revolution, and launched the modern missionary movement.
Like the witchcraft at Cane Ridge, you can experience this. Notice below that we have noted that the singing which AROUSES and condemned by Paul is identified as sorcery. The drugs induced when women or effeminate males begin to "move and groove" can bring on premature birth.
laughing, crying, shaking, running around the building, fast dancing, running, etc, followed by collapse; barking-howling, trances, drunkenness, falling out, oinking, being "hot", fanning self or blowing walking like chickens, high pitched whine reminiscent of a lively horse
mooing and crowing, swimming in the spirit-on the back and also breast stroke style, women going through imaginary birth pangs, hopping like kangaroos, loss of consciousness, trying to soar like eagles
hissing and moving like a snake, inability to speak and involuntary body spasms, kung fu-like stances, vomiting in the spirit and holy head-banging, stripping (taking off clothes. David did that)
These are all ancient and modern signs of witchcraft or DEVIL WORSHIP. Sounds like some of what the women at Donnie's church posted as a wish list.
You TOO will experience miracles: in the words of Blackeby-King followed by Shelly "you can do GREATER things" than Moses and YOU can do greater WORKS than Jesus did. What Jesus said is that you MUST WORK harder and go into the world. Rather than NEW WINSKINS or NAVIGATING THE WINDS OF CHANGE, he 'gonna introduce NEW ENGINES OF CHANGE such as identificational repentance, spiritual mapping, rabbit teams, on site prayer, an emphasis on fasting (for powering up), and a different leadership concept, sucked in from the Latter Rain.
This intends to network or TAKE CAPTIVE the house churches Rather than the WEEKLY school of the Bible where personal diversites were EXCLUDED because the churh was SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE they will bring you "An upgraded style of church Life" which they claim will bring you CLOSER to God. Jesus didn't say GET BUNDLED UP but GET EDIFIED which means EDUCATED with the BIBLE--everything else excluded.
God will RULE DIRECTLY which which Shelly-York deliver as "the individual will not read, interpret or speak the Word outside of the community" which means COMMUNE. All Bible speak will be the product of a GROUP effort led by SCHOLARS. Of course since the Holy Spirit leads and neo-apostles get visions and hear voices that means that YOU will believe and teach what the CULT LEADERS tell you to believe.
When God pours out His WRATH this means that He sends buffons, jesters, musicians and all of the "sorcery" class of PARASITES to bring His promised STRONG DELUSIONS to drive the masses into one camp which is the role of the LOCUSTS or Abaddon's MUSICIANS who separate according to MARKS.
Now, DONNIE, how about that VOMITING IN THE SPIRIT. CLAPPING also meant VOMITING. Watch for this coming to a church near you.
Amazed (no login) 64.185.31.125
Keep it up
January 25 2006, 5:13 PM
Ken- I won't be posting on this site anymore because of you - you can read more about it under "Does Knowledge Come From The Heart"- I just wanted to say, keep making an ass of yourself. For those of us who are "change agents" or who have left the C of C, you make all of our points more than valid. People like you remove any temptation to EVER look back.
I have a 2 part question I would like to humbly and sincerely ask you.
1.) Is the Holy Bible alone and in its entirety your source of truth?
2.) If your answer to #1 is yes; do you believe the Bible teaches that in the last days the condition of churches will be more faithful or more apostate? I will cite a few scriptures:
"Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;" - 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3.
2 Timothy 3
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. 6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.
10 But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience, 11 Persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what persecutions I endured: but out of them all the Lord delivered me. 12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. 13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. 14 But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; 15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Madison?
February 1 2006, 11:20 AM
What happened at Madison this week?
(no login) 72.150.118.55
About what?
February 2 2006, 3:58 AM
So, you’re a concerned Christian about _______________________ (please fill in)?
On January 22, 2006, the preacher exclaimed: “Catch the wind; God has a sailboat for you—the Holy Spirit.” He pointed out the difference between the overemphasis on the Holy Spirit among Charismatic Churches and the lack thereof in churches of Christ. So, what’s the implication—half-baked Charismatic-ism in the church today?
There were quite a few singy-clappy songs, a solo performance with o-o-o in the background by the Musical Worship Leader’s Praise Team. The invitation song with a good title, “Boundless Love,” and Calvinistic in content—“And I can’t believe that He selected me!”
That Sunday gathering was Charismatic in atmosphere. Oh, yes, the “winds of change….” Oh, yes, the doctrine of predestination was taught in the song.
What else is there to say? [BTW, I now have the tape, “Setting Sail.” Hopefully, I can transcribe the sermon as soon as possible and get it posted.]
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: About What
February 2 2006, 10:08 AM
"So, you’re a concerned Christian about" (Please read above postings)
Sounds like they had a great worship service. I look forward to reading the sermon.
(no login) 67.32.199.249
Re: Re: About what?
February 6 2006, 3:22 AM
I have read your postings. [In fact, there’s hardly anything new in your posts that has not already been brought up and/or discussed before.] But I really need a one liner that describes all of the above. Would it be fair to you if I stated something like this: You are concerned that conservative churches of Christ are opposed to implementing Rick Warren’s “church growth” scheme?
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: Re: About what?
February 6 2006, 8:06 PM
...that is exactly what I have been thinking of your postings (referring to your quote about my postings/Same arguments different day.) I am not concerned that churches of Christ are opposed to Rick Warren's Church Growth "Scheme" (as you call it). That is not even close to what my concern is. It is the judging and hurtful attitudes of people that "moderate" this site.
Once again I guess if people do not "Amen" your postings then you feel attacked. Like I have said in other postings we are on the same team, it is just that some are making Heaven a little harder to obtain and striking fear in people by your interpretation and lack of knowledge of doing exegetical study is the main problem I have.
(no login) 68.19.253.194
“hurtful attitudes of” the moderators … hmmm
February 6 2006, 11:36 PM
I think that should be for each reader to make that judgment. Have you ever thought how hurtful your own attitude may be toward the church you either [seem to] have left … or are leaving?
You may be disappointed to know that Rick Warren’s “church growth” scheme [or if you prefer … “SCAM”] has not worked at Madison to my knowledge of evidences. It certainly will not work in churches of Christ whose leaders are grounded in the truth.
Without even discussing your viewpoints, it is very obvious which side you’re on. You’re angry because we do not idolize your model Rick Warren, with whom you’d rather be affiliated than with your former pioneer preachers.
I feel attacked? I would think that after all the postings I’ve written I should be immune to attacks…. Speaking of attacks, you are attacking the church you once were [it seems] a part of. Sorry, but that’s the impression I get.
Donnie
(no login) 67.32.199.249
“We’re in this together.”
February 6 2006, 3:30 AM
Is Madison’s “Musical” Worship Leader really able to discern what’s being taught in the musical pieces that his Praise Team sings to and for the congregation? Or, is either the “sweet” melody or the “upbeat” tempo or the entertaining content—NOT the “teaching and admonition”—his BASIS for selecting songs?
I’ve already mentioned this numerous times on this forum, but it’s worth repeating—“Boundless Love,” as appropriate the title may sound, teaches the doctrine of “predestination.” “Boundless love, unending joy, this is my life, it’s what I know. And I can’t believe that He selected me!”
In essence, the song implies, God purposely selected Thomas … but not Richard. And the ones specially pre-selected will be heaven-bound; on the other hand, all others not specially chosen will be condemned to hell throughout eternity. Is God fair and just in this song—no respecter of persons? Not … according to the “musical worship leader.” And there are other songs he sings that teach error.
The “senior minister” has been slowly and subtly throwing in some teachings he’s learned from his seminary-trained friends—e.g., direct influence of the Holy Spirit upon the Christian [as experienced by folks in Charismatic Churches]. I said “subtle”—he may not use the expression “direct influence,” but the implication is obvious.
Just in this past Sunday’s sermon [first time I heard him say]—“accepting Jesus Christ as your personal Savior.” (You know what that means in the denominational world, don’t you? In case it needs to be explained … it means “only believe or have faith and accept Him as your Savior—and you are cleansed and saved.”) Of course, he was quick to add “baptism” afterwards. But again, what was he thinking? That after one has been saved, then, he is to be baptized as a symbol of redemption? Let’s watch this preacher very closely from now on.
Madison has a new “worship guide.” It now includes quite a bit of information that would normally be in the Madison Marcher—stats regarding attendance and contribution, scheduled events, ministries, etc., and, of course, the different “worship” guide for both: (a) the “traditional” division [I mean, “group”] at 8:00am; and (b) the “contemporary” division [I also mean, “group”] at 10:15am. The early assembly sings hymns and quite a few contemporary “praise” songs. The 10:15 assembly sings mostly [10-15] contemporary PRAISE music with a hymn or two occasionally. (Side Note: Maybe the screen editors will correct this typo error soon: “Dismiss children age 2 – 4th grade to Cannan’s [sic] Land….”)
The Madison Marcher will be a monthly publication.
I have noticed that the following was not projected on the screen this Sunday:
The Family at Madison Church of Christ
So, someone has been paying attention to this forum?
Donnie
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
We’re in this together.”
February 6 2006, 8:47 PM
Are you kidding? Please re-read Ephesians abut what is meant on the subject of "predestined." We have all been "selected" and it is a matter of your choosing to accept Christ that completes the relationship. Your argument about what the song means is pretty shallow.
Your comment about what he is implying on baptism is horrible. You say that he was "quick" to add baptism onto what he was saying. Do you really hear yourself? Once again assuming things.
And as for this part of your posting...(see attached quote below) you need to get a life and be concerned with your own church, unless of course you are an "undercover agent" at Madison. That is a good name for you..."undercover agent"
"(Side Note: Maybe the screen editors will correct this typo error soon: “Dismiss children age 2 –4th grade to Cannan’s [sic] Land….”)"
It now makes sense Donnie, I believe you attend Madison. I am going to start telling (rumor mill like this website) everyone that Donnie Cruz attends Madison.
I assume that is what you mean by all this since you are so privy to what is going on as well as what is on a screen at a particular church service.
The more you read about someone the more enlightening it becomes.
How interesting???
(no login) 68.19.253.194
FYI, God does not “handpick.”
February 7 2006, 4:09 AM
Just where did you get the notion that “accepting Christ … completes the relationship”? What does accepting Christ encompass and entail? And how and where does the relationship begin … that it has to be completed … and when or since it’s completed, is that the end of it?
So, you do believe that God SPECIALLY chooses [“handpicks”] Thomas to be saved … but not Richard? Yes … or … no?
The reference in Ephesians speaks of the church in a collective sense, the redeemed and the faithful. [Don’t forget God’s scheme of redemption—HOW the sinner is redeemed by the blood of Christ and added to the church.] Read Romans 8:28-30—God’s FOREKNOWLEDGE of those who are predestined to be the called out or “the elect” is the key word. I Peter 1:2 also supports the truth that the “elect” is “according to the FOREKNOWLEDGE of God the Father….”
Members of the body of Christ are admonished to remain FAITHFUL unto death in order to receive the crown of life (Rev. 2:10). II Peter 1:10 warns—“give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall.”
Speaking of being concerned with Madison, I am … certainly. What about you? You seem to be opposing and destroying what the church stands for. If your intent is to transform the church to which you are no longer loyal … INTO something else that it is not and shouldn’t be, start building your own from scratch … or feel free to intrude and interfere with the affairs of other religious groups or unite them. See how far that will take you.
Donnie
(no login) 4.152.183.59
God HANDPICKS the PLAN: you pick your DESTINY!
February 7 2006, 10:36 AM
I love to CHALLENGE those who worship the GOD of Augustine--the black African who saw infants burned in the red hot arms of Molech in Carthage--to find ONE individual who has been SINGLED OUT to go to heaven or to hell based on God's decision. You know, just like the Molech worshipped in Carthage, Tyre and Jerusalem, they thought that God gets the GLORY when people see Him burning infants "not an inch long." Wonder just WHO God is so inferior to that He NEEDS to prove that He is more powerful than an infant predestinated to BURN IN HELL from all eternity RAISED to the ETERNITY POWER. And then the burning is just BEGINNING.
The ISSUE is that the Jews thought they were UNIQUELY PREDESTINATED and the Gentiles were IMPURE and not able to be saved even after Christ. Paul convinces them that neither the WORD nor GOD failed: they were simply mistaken. God had the right to choose Gentiles to be saved but He never hand picked individuals.
The CONCLUSION is that Gentiles--as a Nation--are able to come to Christ because THAT was God's PREDESTINATED PLAN from the time Abraham--a Gentile--was to be a blessing to ALL NATIONS which means GENTILES.
Jews were acceptable if they FEARED GOD and WORKED RIGHTEOUSNESS. Paul preached to Gentiles and converted GODFEARERS without having to be A PREDESTINATED JEW FIRST.
If you don't know the MAJOR and MINOR PREMISES you CANNOT reach a valid CONCLUSION.
If we are an US and we have obeyed then we fit the predestinated plan. The danger is taking a verse out of context which no one should ever trust.
"The capacity of the human mind to resist the intrusion of new knowledge, IS INFINITE"
Eph 1:1 PAUL, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:
Eph 1:2 Grace be to you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.
Eph 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: Col.1:13
Those who have been BAPTIZED are added to the grand assembly of all past saved. They are added to Jesus' SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE and are called DISCIPLES or STUDENTS and not PAGAN WORSHIPERS. There is a fork in the road: the LEFT road of the MASSES is predestinated to hell and if you TAKE that fork you are predestinated. The RIGHT fork is taken in COMPLYING and being baptized to be saved: that fork leads to salvation. If you get INTO (eis) that ROAD then you are on the predestinated to HEAVEN Way.
Paul is speaking to people who have been RAISED with Christ in Baptism (Eph 2) and are therefore those who have been saved BY grace THROUGH faith. They are PREDESTINATED to be HOLY because God gave them A holy spirit ONLY connected with Baptism
FIRST: Those who were called or INVITED responded and BECAME the ELECT or ekklesia or called out assembly.
SECOND: The WE is not in contrast to those NOT ELECTED by their own choice.
God chose those who were ADDED to the ELECT LADY at baptism who accepted the CALL or invitation:
According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world,
But! Chosen for WHAT? that we should be HOLY and without blame before him in love: Ephesians 1:4
They were not CHOSEN with a PERIOD at the end of the sentence. In Romans 6 of those who are saved BECAUSE they have obeyed THAT FORM of doctrine, Paul insists that they have to RECKON themselves holy and CONTINUE to be holy. God's PREDESTINATED plan that we ALL be Holy does not MAKE us holy.
They were chosen TO BE HOLY and WITHOUT BLAME.
God DID NOT choose those who REJECT Baptism to give them A HOLY Spirit. They rejected the counsel of God because they REFUSED to change their lives by personally REPENTING.
Chosen for what? that we should be HOLY and WITHOUT BLAME before him in love: Ephesians 1:4
Having predestinated us
Predestinated for what? unto the ADOPTION of children by Jesus Christ to HIMSELF, according to the good pleasure of his will, Ephesians 1:5
Now, it is Jesus Christ who tells us HIS will rather than to pick some to go to hell. He told the apostles to GO PREACH the Gospel to WHOEVER...
Eph 1:6 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.
Eph 1:7 In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;
The PROMIS OF THE SPIRIT was what the Spirit of Christ promised Abraham. That was based on FAITH which meant that Abraham COMPLIED with the laws and commandments of God (Gen 26:4-5). Here is the MARK of those who are on the PREDESTINATED fork of the road:
Gal 3:26 FOR ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:27 FOR as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
THE PREDESTINATED PLAN is realized when the Jews and Gentiles are the elect or CHURCH of Jesus Christ in ONE BODY:
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christs, then are ye Abrahams seed, and heirs according to the PROMISE.
Because the PROMISE was made BEFORE the Law of Moses, those under the Law of Moses cannot be the ONLY ones in the promise. The PROMISE was made BEFORE therefore it is God PRE PROMISE or PRE DESTINED plan. Those who GLADLY ACCEPT BAPTISM are called BELIEVERS. The BELIEVETH NOTS are defined as REBELS or TRAITORS and are on the PREDESTINATED road which LEADS to hell.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: FYI, God does not “handpick.”
February 7 2006, 12:33 PM
My notion to accepting Christ is the answer! What are you talking about? Works it sounds like. Typical! I am not nor is anyone that opposes you and others on this site saying that this is a "once saved always saved" theology. Why are you putting words in my mouth about Predestination? God has chosen everyone to be saved it is just a matter of people choosing to accept God. That is not hard to understand. You imply that we must do something first then God might accept us.
As far as Madison is concerned I am not concerned with them, because we are I thought, supposed to be autonomous in the church of Christ. I still attend the c of c but I am just not concerned with what is going on at other places. It is none of my business nor your business. That is why we attend where we do. Your "Church Shrinking Scheme", is not working look around you.
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: FYI, God does not “handpick.”
February 8 2006, 12:50 AM
WE are not to be concerned with what is happening at another c of C? Did I read that right? That is unbelievable. So much for the scriptures...let's just throw them out why don't we?
I believe the following fits your comment perfectly, and verse 3 is exactly what I see happening with such unChristian comments.
2 Ti 4:2Preach the word; BE INSTANT in season, out of season; REPROVE, REBUKE, EXHORT with ALL longsuffering and DOCTRINE.
2Ti 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
2Ti 4:4 And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
2Ti 4:5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.
2Ti 4:6 For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.
2Ti 4:7 I have fought a good fight, I have finished [my] course, I have kept the faith:
Concerned Christians (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: FYI, God does not “handpick.”
February 8 2006, 4:57 PM
People like Rick, Amazed, Sethy and the others that come in and leave immediately are not saying that anything goes. You seem to read one thing and just jump to conclusions.
Each person that comes on that you don't agree 100% with is still praising Jesus and loving Him more everyday for the saving Grace of the blood. I would venture to say that You, Dr. Crump, Donnie and ummm David who occasionally comes on feels the same way. That Jesus Saves! YEAH! Praise God! I hope that wasn't too loud or irreverent.
The problem is, we feel that Grace and Jesus are not in a box of rules and regulations.
Remember if it was not for Rick, Amazed, Sethy, and Myself you wouldn't have any "REPROVING, REBUKING, or EXHORTING" going on.
Thank God for my education at a church of Christ college. It helped change me from hiding behind signs and now behind the cross.
See you in Heaven!!! And I mean that sincerely. Don’t make Heaven so unattainable that you are in constant FEAR. Don't be afraid to interpret something different outside of the church of Christ Hermeneutic it is mind blowing
My ears are itching, itching for more of Jesus
...and thanks for the reminder...I look forward to saying, "2Ti 4:7 I have fought a good fight, I have finished [my] course, I have kept the faith"
How is that "Un-Christian-Like" Judge PPB???
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: We’re in this together.”
February 7 2006, 8:25 PM
Concerned Christian,
As a Christian, I'm doing as God commands and calling you on your unChristian behavior. Do you really mean to be that immature? Do you really want to stab and slander a fellow Christian?
Sad...Plus, your understanding of Ephesians is outright scary. Have you read the rest of the Bible?
Yes, I'm on a role with you and Amazed. Because I am a Concerned Christian and I am Amazed at the lack of biblical knowledge you two validate. Both of you argue "feelings" but neither one of you deal with scripture. Hmmmm...another "I'm a Christian without reading ALL of my Bible".
Are both of you Presbyterian?
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: We’re in this together.”
February 8 2006, 3:47 PM
Thank you for the snide comment...expected that. You heard me right...stop worrying about other c of C's.
I am Christian and refuse to hide behind signs. Thanks for asking. What is your call name? Once again thank you for being one of the proud and few who knows if people are being "un-Christian-like" or if they are going to Heaven or not.
Please continue to re-read Ephesians and do not fall into the trap of taking things out of context like the rest of your friends on this site. I read unity not conformity in Ephesians. Big difference. "Outright Scary" isn't it.
By the way back to the original point of this discussion instead of playing Judge or anything like that...What part of God choosing us do you not understand? And then by the same token in order to complete the circle we choose Jesus by accepting Him as our Savior. Please go back to the beginning of your Bible and read where God talks about the plan of Jesus. That is where the plan of how Jesus is prophesied. It does not read "that man devised a plan in order to restore our relationship with God, so here it is God please get on it."
Thanks for being "Concerned" about "Amazed" and I. From what he is saying and where I am coming from is...we believe in Jesus and just have chosen to let go of the bondage of tradition and Hermeneutic (do you know what that means?)
I am happy to go to a Church of Christ Building where people are not concerned with the others in town and how happy people are about their salvation through Jesus. I guess that is wrong, because that is how I and others at church believe.
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: We’re in this together.”
February 8 2006, 7:24 PM
Concerned Christian,
Thanks for making my point! You completely ignored the scriptures and did it YOUR way. Wow! So, your going to stick to your poor interpretation of Ephesians and just ignore the rest of what God said.
By the way, what do you do with the rest of the Bible? Coaster? Door stop?
Yes, sarcastic but clearly makes my point. You can hide from the truth, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to. YOu can ignore major parts of the NT, but don't expect me to. I care about God and his commands too much to think I'm above them. I'm not going to sit by and hope "love" will be enough. I'm not going to sit here and ignore the rest of the Bible because it isn't easy or what I want it to be. God said to rebuke others if they are teaching false doctrine and I will. Because I love the Lord and keep his commandments.
It isn't My word, it's God's Word! ALL OF IT.
Thanks, but no thanks. I don't want anything to do with your weakened version of Christianity. My soul is too important to me to play chance with. If you feel the need, then go ahead, but don't condemn those who don't want to play your games.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: We’re in this together.”
February 8 2006, 10:10 PM
Thank you making my point. FEAR FEAR FEAR
(no login) 70.157.45.194
Fear … Fear … Fear of the Lord
February 8 2006, 11:39 PM
The fear of the Lord:
2 Chronicles 19:[7] Wherefore now let the fear of the LORD be upon you; take heed and do it: for there is no iniquity with the LORD our God, nor respect of persons, nor taking of gifts. … [9] And he charged them, saying, Thus shall ye do in the fear of the LORD, faithfully, and with a perfect heart.
Job 28:[28] And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.
Psalms 19:[9] The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether.
Pss. 34:[11] Come, ye children, hearken unto me: I will teach you the fear of the LORD.
Pss. 111:[10] The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments: his praise endureth for ever.
Prov. 1:[7] The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction. [29] For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD:
Prov. 2:[5] Then shalt thou understand the fear of the LORD, and find the knowledge of God.
Prov. 8:[13] The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
Prov. 9:[10] The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.
Prov. 10:[27] The fear of the LORD prolongeth days: but the years of the wicked shall be shortened.
Prov. 14:[26] In the fear of the LORD is strong confidence: and his children shall have a place of refuge. [27] The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death.
Prov. 15:[16] Better is little with the fear of the LORD than great treasure and trouble therewith. [33] The fear of the LORD is the instruction of wisdom; and before honour is humility.
Prov. 16:[6] By mercy and truth iniquity is purged: and by the fear of the LORD men depart from evil.
Prov. 19:[23] The fear of the LORD tendeth to life: and he that hath it shall abide satisfied; he shall not be visited with evil.
Prov. 22:[4] By humility and the fear of the LORD are riches, and honour, and life.
Prov. 23:[17] Let not thine heart envy sinners: but be thou in the fear of the LORD all the day long.
Heb. 12:[28] Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear
[There are MORE passages….]
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: Fear … Fear … Fear of the Lord
February 9 2006, 10:01 PM
Good Scriptures. Being scared out of my mind would have been a more appropriate way of describing what I meant. I fear the Lord but not in the sense of being so scared that if I do something outside of tradition that I will be sent to Hell.
I just hear tones from PPB that he is scared to death and it is so sad. Like I said before I began to grow from a "fear relationship" with God to getting to know Him instead of just "knowing about Him."
PPB thank you for your patience, but I will not go back to shackles, I just refuse. I love the Lord more today than ever before and being scared to death if I do something out of tradition is just not how I live anymore. These Mega churches of Christ (as has been discussed time and time again) are growing and it is not some "Church Growth Scheme" it is just a refusal to be scared...it is about a relationship with the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Being filled with a bunch of memory verses and quotes won't get anyone to Heaven. God will simply know us. Do you Know Him or Know about Him? Big Difference! Matthew 25:31-46 is a pretty good start at being Christlike and thus getting to know God, not the religion of "oh you worshiped XYZ way on Sunday so you can't come in."
God Bless
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: We’re in this together.”
February 8 2006, 10:20 PM
What is your belief, do you believe that God is confused or do you believe that He designed a plan and then we choose Him and complete that relationship?
(no login) 70.157.45.194
Who is confused?
February 9 2006, 12:30 AM
Confused? Nope. I Corinthians 14:33—“For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.”
Interestingly you said: “He designed a plan and then we choose Him and complete that relationship.”
Guess what? “Almost thou persuadest me …” to agree with you completely … but NOT quite!
What Ken Sublett said earlier is correct and in agreement with the Scripture: “God HANDPICKS the PLAN: you pick your DESTINY!”
I disagree with the part—“and complete that relationship.” Where did you learn this from? I can’t even find the word “relation” or “relationship” in my Bible … much less “complete that relationship.” And that’s not really the point. But if you insist on a relationship with the Lord, when a sinner becomes God’s child, he BEGINS [NOT COMPLETES] a relationship of service for his Lord and Master.
Despite your made-up doctrine, you’ve shown some improvement in your understanding of the scriptures. You’ve never commented on the notion “that God has purposely SPECIALLY SELECTED Thomas [remember that song: “…I can’t believe that He selected me….”] to be saved and has PREDESTINATELY CONDEMNED Richard to everlasting punishment. I take it that you no longer believe that God chooses only those whom He wants saved. That’s a good sign. It also good to know that you are now saying that WE CHOOSE Him!
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Who is confused?
February 9 2006, 2:17 PM
Donnie,
Good verses. I still don't understand why these new "enlightened" Christians don't believe you can love and fear God at the same time. Isn't that the normal parent/child relation? Fear of disappointing our parents, fear of being judged as failing, fear of doing what we know is wrong? All because we love them so much and their opinion is so important to us.
This is the God that flooded the world, leaving only Noah and his family alive. This is the God that struck that poor man for his instinctive reaction to save the Ark from falling - I don't think he intentionally set out to break God's law at that time, but to save something very important. It's like they believe God "weakened" over time.
Amazing really, to think that we are so much more intelligent that the Apostles, or that's what Concerned Christian and Amazed would have us believe. They still have not addressed the verses about rebuking and admonishing false teachings. Seems the "change agents" have a new slogan: "Don't worry about what's happening here and we won't worry about what's happening at your church". Awfully convenient...
I find myself becoming less patient and understanding of these "new" christians, and more irritated by their absolute refusal to abide by all of God's Word. I have to work on that, and continue to remember they are blinded by their own desires...
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: Who is confused?
February 9 2006, 10:37 PM
Donnie you said in your posting, "That’s a good sign. It also good to know that you are now saying that WE CHOOSE Him!"
"I take it that you no longer believe that God chooses only those whom He wants saved." Never said that, you did in your ripping of Keith Lancaster
Once again writing before reading please go back to my original post on February 6 2006, 8:47 PM I said, "We have all been "selected" and it is a matter of your [choosing] to accept Christ that completes the relationship."
That is what I already said...WE CHOOSE Him! When I say God has selected all it is not meaning Thomas and leaving out Richard. It means the entire population of the world before us and after us. God's plan encompasses everyone, it comes back to my original posting of we must choose him in order to complete the relationship/bond/salvation/covenant etc. I want to make sure that you understand what I am saying so I used a bunch of extra words.
So that you do not misunderstand me again the word "your" that I used in my original posting means You, Me, Thomas, Richard etc. Everyone was chosen by God it is a matter of ones refusal or choosing to God.
Thanks for the compliment ten post later.
JAY CUTLER (no login) 199.91.33.254
RE: Question for PPB
February 9 2006, 12:52 PM
PPB,
In Jesus ministry, was he more concerned about "following the law" and rebuking people that didn't do so.. Or was he more concerned with loving people and serving them?
Seems to me that his whole message was mainly about love and service to other people.. not to go around playing hall monitor and telling everyone that they were going to Hell.
(no login) 4.153.69.68
You answered a good question.
February 9 2006, 10:53 PM
Now, if you can just get the "love bugs" and "grace-types" from lying, cheating and stealing our church houses and peace of the widows who purchased the property then CAN WE ALL GET ALONG? Sure.
If you can get them from ganging up to decide that Scripture has been SIFTED AWAY and "we gonna partner with God to get us some new stuff" then CAN WE GET ALONG?
If you can keep them from FILLING up offices in the church with compliant brother and sistern "ministry majors" for which there is no VACANCY nor FUNDING legislation then we CAN get along and THEY can get a job.
If we can get them from intimidating and using psychological violence by decreeing that "individuals cannot read, interpret or speak anything about Scripture OUTSIDE of the COMMUNITY (commune) interpretation BETTER done by scholars" then we CAN get along without them VEREEEE Wellll.
In the image of Rubel using the Aztec paradigm: 'those being invaded turn hostile and mount an attack.' The the LOVE stuff intends to silence the people being molested in the middle of the street: wont work anymore. We have learned how to BUCK the saddle people have lashed on our backs and they AIN'T A GONNA "lade burdens" anymore. If they can get off, get a job and quit lying to widows about the law of TITHING and the LAW OF GIVING then we may put them on house arrest.
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: RE: Question for PPB
February 10 2006, 1:20 AM
Jay,
Can you actually make such a statement in regards to Christ's message and those of the INSPIRED Apostles, after having read all the NT? If so, then I do fear what is becoming of supposed Christians in our world today.
Did you miss Christ's teachings? "Mustard seed", "lost sheep" or "vines that bear bad fruit" ring any bells? What about his message on false teachers and rebuking them/turning away? What about those who will have taught in his name but he will not know them at judgement day? What about obeying the commands of his Father? Or...I could go on and on.
Ummmm, those don't ring with just love, they discuss fear - fear of failing, of falling away and becoming lost, of not entering Heaven. So, what you are asking is that I only teach the "love" parts and ignore those other verses, correct? To stop alerting Christians to false teachers and only focus on "Love"? Ahhh...so you're asking me to ignore part of God's Word. I ask you with all sincerity, who is whispering in your ear? Do you truly believe that Christ would ask you to ignore portions of God's Word?
Jesus didn't teach just love, he taught love with obedience. Selective hearing/reading at it's finest.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.164.39
Gospel Includes Love, Helping Others, and Obedience
February 10 2006, 12:01 PM
I appreciate PPB's response to Mr. Cutler's question.
Cutler implies that Christ focused mainly on love and helping others and downplayed strict obedience to His Word. Cutler further implies that we readily consign to hell those whom we feel are not following Christ’s Word. These are common falsehoods which detractors of this web site espouse. Shall we be more concerned about attracting the entertainment-seeking folks by focusing only on the pleasant message of sweetness and acceptance while avoiding the very stern words which Christ used against disobedience to God? A half-gospel is much easier to swallow. But lest we forget what the New Testament says about obedience:
Let’s not forget that of Jesus’ fifty parables that are recorded in the four Gospels, 16 (32 percent) are devoted solely and expressly to the subject of obedience and faithfulness to God and the drastic consequences of behaving otherwise. Although the other parables cover a variety of topics, obedience/disobedience constitutes the single most recurring theme. That should tell us how strongly Jesus regards our obedience to Him or the lack thereof. Interestingly, only ONE parable out of the entire fifty (only 2 percent) focuses on love (given after receiving forgiveness of sins) and that is the parable of the two debtors (Luke 7:41-50 KJV). We are to have love, but if we care little for obedience to God’s Word, then all that love avails us nothing, for even atheists and other non-Christians can “love” people and help the needy.
Let’s not forget Christ’s admonition that we observe all things whatsoever He commanded us (Matt. 28:20).
Let’s not forget Christ’s words that join love with obedience: if we love Him, we will keep His commandments (John 14:15). The Gospel or doctrine of Christ is LOVE and OBEDIENCE.
Let’s not forget Christ’s words through John’s first epistle, which again merge love with obedience: the love of God is to keep His commandments (1 John 5:1-4). The Gospel or doctrine of Christ is LOVE and OBEDIENCE.
Let’s not forget Christ’s words through Paul that we mark and avoid those who preach a gospel or doctrine other than that of Christ (Romans 16:17-18). To say that Christ was more concerned about having love and helping people is to downplay half of the Gospel or hide that half from the undiscerning, for Christ preached a WHOLE Gospel of LOVE and OBEDIENCE. To mark and avoid rebels who preach only half a gospel by no means consigns them to hell, for we have neither the authority nor the desire to do so. But we do have biblical authority to expose the ungodly who pervert, alter, and otherwise revise the Word to suit their own agenda. The Gospel or doctrine of Christ is LOVE and OBEDIENCE.
Let’s not forget Christ’s words through John’s second epistle that those who espouse and preach a gospel other than that of Christ are not of God and are doers of evil deeds (2 John 9-11). The Gospel or doctrine of Christ is LOVE and OBEDIENCE.
Let’s not forget Christ’s words through Paul that those who preach a different gospel or doctrine from that of Christ are accursed (Gal. 1:6-12). The Gospel or doctrine of Christ is LOVE and OBEDIENCE.
Christ preached love and forgiveness to those who repent of their transgressions, but He equally condemns those who have contempt for obedience to His Word.
Amazed (no login) 172.152.22.162
This is great
February 10 2006, 3:38 PM
This is one of the best discussions that I have seen on this site. Everyone seems to have something good to say.
I agree w/ Dr. Crump and PPB that obedience to Christ's teachings are vital. I also agree with Jay that the primary emphasis of Jesus' ministry (not parables), was loving people.
Think of the woman who washed his feet with tears, or the woman dragged to him that was caught in adultery. How would their lives have changed if he went all legalistic on them? He loved them, accepted their faults, THEN said, "obey me."
You're both right! Keep up the good discussion.
(no login) 67.141.24.24
Are you serious?
February 11 2006, 1:15 PM
PPB,
You wrote:
"I still don't understand why these new "enlightened" Christians don't believe you can love and fear God at the same time. Isn't that the normal parent/child relation?"
Heaven help us. My wife and I raised 3 children who are now adults serving in or training for ministry. They all love us and never feared us. Your logical non sequetir has been exposed. You write about loving and fearing God and use the parent/child relationship as an example, but you can't quite carry it off. You said the child fears DISAPPOINTING his parent. There is a huge difference between fearing the parent and not wanting to disappoint the parent.
I'm glad you weren't my mother.
Fear has many definitions and when it comes to our relationship with God it does not mean being frightened of Him It means having a reverent fear, someting that doesn't completely translate.
Besides, the Apostle John wrote in I John 4:18 "There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love." (KJV)
Exegete that.
Rick
Anonymous (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Are you serious?
February 11 2006, 4:19 PM
Rick,
You have shown your true colors to everyone on this site and to God. You have chosen to ignore and dismiss his own commandment of fear. You have chosen to make the word mean more than intended. We do not fear God as a spirit or being. We fear his wrath, his judgement, failing him, being lost. There is a huge difference between those fears.
I take offense at your comment regarding my children. That was unChristian and extremely arrogant of you. I choose to ignore such a ridiculous comment. And I laugh at your assumption that they are afraid of me in a physical manner. But you are wrong if you believe your children were not fearful of disappointing you or disobeying you. If not, then what relationship did you really have?
Your comments make me think you live in a world of "rose colored glasses" and that you refuse to see reality on many levels. I have more fear of someone who refuses to acknowledge ALL of God's word than someone who fails to acknowledge God at all.
If you wish to discuss scriptural text, let's look at just a few of MANY verses in the Bible that discuss fear. Are you saying God is a God of confusion?
Exegete this...
2Cr 7:1 Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
Eph 5:21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.
Phl 2:12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
1Ti 5:20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
Hbr 4:1 Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left [us] of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.
Hbr 12:28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:
Phobos (fear): to be put in fear
1) fear, dread, terror
a) that which strikes terror
2) reverence for one's husband
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Are you serious?
February 12 2006, 2:18 AM
Oops, that last post from Anonymous was from me...Guess I fogot to put in my name!
(no login) 67.141.24.24
Big Clarification
February 13 2006, 9:09 AM
PPB,
If I said anything that offended you, then I truly apologize. I believe that you misunderstood what I wrote. I never said anything about your children. I am sure that they are fine people who are very happy to be your children. I said, "I'm glad you're not my mother." There is a big difference between what I wrote and what you inferred. (Unnecessarily)
You did try to use the parent/child relationship to explain the one we have with God. You did say,
"I still don't understand why these new "enlightened" Christians don't believe you can love and fear God at the same time. Isn't that the normal parent/child relation? Fear of disappointing our parents, fear of being judged as failing, fear of doing what we know is wrong? All because we love them so much and their opinion is so important to us."
The problem with that statement is that you are saying 2 different things. You write about loving and fearing God in one sentence, then write about fear of disappointing, fear of being judged, fear of doing wrong. The non sequetir comes when you don't bridge the gap between the 2 statements.
I do believe that we need to fear God, but our lack of understanding of the word fear has caused us to seek illogical explanations. The word phobos can mean fear, terror, reverence or respect, or a combinations of these concepts. By transferring our fear of God into something other than Him, I believe you have watered down the word.
That's why I preach context, context, context.
In an effort to show what I perceived to be a flaw in your logic I made an absurd statement about you being my mother. It is not something I invented, using an aburdity to point out another one. I now withdraw that and again, apoligize.
BTW: You never did deal with 1 John 4:18.
Rick
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Unity or Conformity?
February 18 2006, 9:47 PM
A person has only to sit in one of our Bible class discussions to see how foolish our claim for doctrinal unity is. No two of us agree on everything. We cannot evade this point. To emphasize this truth, a list of one hundred issues over which individuals have disagreed is given below. We have continued in congregational fellowship while disagreeing on these many points; thus our very practice has been inconsistent with our denial of unity in diversity.
1. taking of oaths
2. serving in the military
3. inflicting capital punishment
4. using force to defend oneself or others
5. voting for political candidates
[ . . . ]
95. if we shall know each other in heaven
96. degrees of reward and punishment
97. whether heaven and hell are literal places
98. dress code for men serving the Lord's Supper
99. whether Christ came in AD 70
100. a name for the church
No doubt, one can add to this rounded count of 100 issues. How absurd it is for us to pretend to be united doctrinally when it is not likely that there is even one small congregation among us in total agreement on all these matters.
The point is Jesus is being taught at Madison, Oak Hills, etc. and we will disagree on things.
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 68.19.221.129 on Feb 20, 2006 12:40 PM
(no login) 68.19.221.129
Re: Unity or Conformity?
February 20 2006, 12:50 PM
Dear Concerned,
You have brought up good points. In fact, these are points that are now common place among proponents of the Change Movement in the brotherhood in order to defend their cause to “TRANSFORM” the New Testament church into something else that it isn’t and shouldn’t be.
If “my memory serves me correctly,” [ ] this same list has already been brought up in one of the earlier threads—it will take a while to look through Index pages 1,2,3,4,5 of this forum. This list has also been brought up and discussed at Rubel Shelly’s website.
Having said all that, I would like to make a suggestion: Due to the current specific issues confronting Madison, I feel that we shouldn’t compound them anymore than necessary. The compiled list, generally speaking, can be applicable to any religious body on earth. And to give the impression that the points are Madison-specific, or church-of-Christ-specific for that matter, would be misleading, especially in Madison’s Timeline thread.
Your own remarks in the above post [for each reader’s sake], however, has been posted UNEDITED—I have included a sample of what the list is comprised of.
I would suggest, if you’re still interested in pursuing this, to create a new thread regarding this matter by clicking “Suggest Topic!” If not, there’s already a thread to which you may want to add your post:
“Unity in Diversity at Madison: Traditional vs. Contemporary—Which?” (October 6, 2005 is the date of the last post.)
Another option is to create a new thread in “Sunday School in Exile”—you’re familiar with this thread, I know:
Then, I can update your post above with the link to your new post.
Thanks!
Donnie
__________________
P.S.: Please provide the source of your list. I have it somewhere, but it will take me a while to find it. Thanks!
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: Unity or Conformity?
February 22 2006, 12:37 AM
Donnie,
Per your request. I attached the first line of the paragraph as well as the website for the reference to the 100.
"This listing borrows heavily from a list by Patrick M. Phillips, who also gives credit to James Robert Jarrell, in Mission Messenger, May 1971."
[Thanks for this link to the website—I have added it to one of my “favorites” folders called “Ex-church-of-Christ-sites.” Donnie]
Thanks
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 68.19.204.221 on Feb 24, 2006 4:00 AM
(no login) 68.19.204.221
I have checked out the “freedoms” website and …
February 24 2006, 4:17 AM
To Concerned:
My request was to ask you to choose one of 3 options. I guess any of the choices was not good enough. It appears, then, that we will not pursue discussing the listed items. But that’s OK with me. Anyway, most of the issues are irrelevant to Madison’s timeline and are also the same matters being discussed endlessly amongst various religious groups.
Because I was quite familiar with the 100-list, I really wanted to make sure whether or not the message and the list originated from you. Why? Because many who have apostatized from the church have their terminologies, expressions, reasons, excuses, derisive remarks, despicable motives and actions against the church invariably the same.
Let me quote some of the comments from the link you provided:
“A person has only to sit in one of our Bible class discussions to see how foolish our claim for doctrinal unity is. No two of us agree on everything. We cannot evade this point. To emphasize this truth, a list of one hundred issues over which individuals have disagreed is given below. We have continued in congregational fellowship while disagreeing on these many points; thus our very practice has been inconsistent with our denial of unity in diversity.
1. taking of oaths
2. serving in the military
3, inflicting capital punishment
4. using force to defend oneself or others
5. voting for political candidates
6. serving as a government official
7. engaging in political activism
[. . .]
96. degrees of reward and punishment
97. whether heaven and hell are literal places
98. dress code for men serving the Lord's Supper
99. whether Christ came in AD 70
100. a name for the church
No doubt, you can add to this rounded count of 100 issues. This listing borrows heavily from a list by Patrick M. Phillips, who also gives credit to James Robert Jarrell, in Mission Messenger, May 1971. How absurd it is for us to pretend to be united doctrinally when it is not likely that there is even one small congregation among us in total agreement on all these matters.
Then there are "big" issues over which we have created open divisions, aligning brethren in different sectarian, exclusive groups. Phillips noted thirty divisions due to [. . .]>
The quoted material above is taken from the first chapter titled “The Issues Before Us” in the book, “Free In Christ,” written by Cecil Hook.
That “freedoms” website, just like you, has a lot of negative things to say about the church that you have practically left but cannot leave alone because of your determination to transform it into a “believe-anything-any-religion-says” type of church—and that’s about the essence of what that website purports. Besides, look at the list of “Links to Other Sites”:
Wineskins Magazine (Rubel Shelly, et al)
Family Dynamics Institute (Joe Beam)
Grace Centered Magazine (Rubel Shelly, et al)
Unity in Diversity (Mission and Message of Carl Ketcherside)
… etc.
Might as well add this one also:
http://www.willowcreek.com/ (See if your [the reader’s] congregation is now a “Community Church” and affiliated with this org., and you didn’t know it)
Any member loyal to Christ’s church or one who does not want to see the church destroyed or acquired or tampered with or perverted or intruded upon should be vigilant against this menace and infectious disease. When a church member reads about these accusations and labels, then, the change agents are suspect to him—“legalism … moving from legalism … Pharisaical … questions that challenge our traditional teachings and practices … the pattern … only trust … grace [untaught] … deaconess … the “Church of Christ” sign … shepherds [“elders” is not the preferred word—elders are mean] … “the finished work of Christ” … baptism [as in being dunked to get wet] …” … etc., etc.
So, Concerned—are you Cecil Hook or related to him?
Donnie
Scary Change Movement Guy (no login) 209.40.150.214
You are funny
February 24 2006, 5:13 PM
Donnie,
What are you so afraid of? When I look at your writings, and those of others on this site, I see a lot of fear and "conspiracy theories", and very little fact.
[Above is just a little flavor of this guy's motive. The rest ... is not available for viewing at this time.]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Scary … Guy,
I have saved your entire post on condition that….
It’s the same old “Change Movement” tactics that we already know. If you really care to have your message posted, then, you must identify yourself or your church affiliation. Why? Often, church dissidents, dissenters and apostates are more hostile to the church that they are supposed to be members of than those who are of other religious faiths.
Donnie
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 70.156.21.241 on Feb 24, 2006 10:38 PM
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: I have checked out the “freedoms” website and …
February 24 2006, 6:09 PM
I put the listing on here so we could discuss the various differences that you, myself, Sublett, etc have disagreements on but can still fellowship. There is no possible way You, Crump,Rhoades, Waddey, and Sublett all agree on everything, yet you can still call them brother.
Like I said in a posting a few weeks ago, I wonder how old you are? These arguments that you still hold onto, are things I was worried about when I was a child, however when I grew up I was able to begin to study and see the HOLES in our Hermeneutic. It did not mean it was leading me to hell it was just ignorant arguments.
The points you make are great for a certain type of Christian (checklist theology) I for one along with many thousands of Christians whether it be in the c of C, Baptist etc. have begun to realize that a checklist theology is one full of Fear (scared).
I understand where you are coming from because I once defended the "old" c of C tradition. However, you are angry and can't consider people Christians because they think differently from you and the tradition you love. Donnie making Heaven hard to obtain is fine, I and thousands of other Church of Christer's just don't have the time or the patience to do that "Checklist Theology" anymore.
I know I know...I am wrong and have a love affair with Satan and am on fire for hell. That's why I got a Bible Degree was because I wanted to learn more about Satan and his ways.
I am not leaving the church of Christ as you wish. It is going great and the love affair with Jesus and His Grace is overwhelmingly high. You make fun of David Lipscomb and other Schools and it is just sad to see your hard heart over and over again come to light on this site. We are in a battle against Satan and you keep shooting arrows at your own troops. Nice Job!
I am loyal to Christ's Church, I just choose to let God lead me and not be bound by tradition and interpretation. When it comes down to it God is going to want to know you. Do you know Him or know about Him? When he separates the Sheep and Goats I believe it goes further than church signs, gang signs, getting "Dunked" calling an Elder a Shepherd/Bishop, whether Phoebe was really a Deaconess and sit on her hands and do nothing or actually labor in the congregation (and I don't mean cook a potluck) but how you treat your fellow man. etc...etc. Read the Greatest Commands.
I am related to Cecil Hook he is a brother in Christ to me and I am proud to say that I have learned much and continue to learn much about our tradition and how we can be "Free in Christ" rather than burdened by chains.
So, Donnie - are you Ken Sublett or related to him?
P.S. You, Donnie asked for the reference to the list I had so that is why I put it on the posting. Thanks for being rude AGAIN. I bet your sermons are uplifting too. I am tired of you and others getting to be rude all the time and it is thought of as "Rebuking", "Christ-like". It is has to stop.
(no login) 68.19.221.127
“Old Traditions of cofC”—Coined by the Change Agents
February 25 2006, 5:52 PM
Dear Concerned Change Strategist,
Your slick schemes—to conveniently incorporate BORROWED doctrines and practices from various religious faiths into the church—are nothing new. FYI, they’re all outlined in another thread:
Traditions! What traditions? Did you mean doctrines? If you want to change traditions, go see the Pope and coerce him into changing the Roman Catholic Church traditions. Go see other religious faiths—after all, you’ve learned so much of their theologies.
No! The issues at Madison or among churches of Christ are not about voting for political candidates, serving the military, passing the collection baskets, buildings, eating in the church building, the order of “worship,” the baptistery, church building steeples, inflicting capital punishment, integration of races, the extent of evolution, use of contraceptives, etc., etc.
Nor are the differences of opinions between two individual Christians the issue. You know, I’m embarrassed [ ] to have to remind you of what you already know—that no two human beings will agree on everything until they stop breathing. That was really wise of you to bring up such common knowledge.
I am sorry. Your study to look for “HOLES in our Hermeneutic” does not impress me one bit. Of course, it was “not leading [you] to hell,” but you and your mentors have dug HOLES that did not pre-exist.
No! I was not making fun of Lipscomb University! Cautioning and being aware of danger signals are not fun.
I am not going to waste time discussing your desires to disturb peaceable churches.
You’re right about my being “rude AGAIN.” Because you were trapped? I’d rather be rude to church intruders than be rude to the church being constantly attacked and perverted by intruders like you.
Call that rude if that makes you happy. Just be reminded that to my knowledge, I have posted all of your messages—most of which, by the way, are negative and truly discredit the church you’ve left but still refuse to leave alone. If you honestly believe and feel that you are loyal to the church whose adherence to NT teachings bothers you to the point of distracting it and judging its teachings and beliefs wrong … you must be joking. Take your “evangelistic” fervor and implement your mission schemes and methodologies somewhere else.
Donnie
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: “Old Traditions of cofC”—Coined by the Change Agents
February 25 2006, 10:09 PM
Thank you for putting my postings on. I do appreciate that. However...
Borrowed Theologies? I have received an education that goes further than some "living room" Bible Study.
No I meant Traditions. Which you make Doctrine.
Your HOLES do not impress me anymore, they make me sad for you.
I am not sturring up trouble. I am just excited about the "New Found Christianity" (as you call it) that I have been freed to discover.
Trapped? How! Remember I said I was freed of Shackles.
Truly Discredit? I guess so, because it is a fear religion that you follow.
No I won't go anywhere. It is working right here in the Church of Christ.
Thanks Though!
(no login) 4.152.183.63
RELIGIOUS PROSTITUTES ALL.
February 24 2006, 11:18 PM
Ken at about age 65 got FREE AT LAST. Rather than listening to silly sermons from outlines PROCURED at Anti Christ University, he became a DISCIPLE OF CHRIST. Once they get their fangs into you you have to tear flesh to get loose.
Ken doesn't PAY mediators in song in sermon. Ken doesn't DO religious rituals. He found out that Sabbath doesn't mean DAY OF WORSHIP but REST as in the word REST. That excluded travel, inporting 'ministers,' or even SPEAKING YOUR OWN WORDS. They READ or REHERSED the Word of God which is what Jesus did, Paul commanded Timothy, the church in Romans 15 after EXCLUDING the musical sectarians in Romans 14 which PLEASURED one another, did not include SANGING and TWANGING as an Act of worship until the first heresy in the year 373, and DID NOT enforce the LAW of GIVING which Malachi has God calling such robbers.
Jesus built an EKKLESIA and Paul used the word SYNAGOGUE. You have to pay an OBSCENE amount to PROCURE a PhDuh to have some half wit tell you that church is KIRKE meaning the holy whore of John's secret message which SINGERS will never hear; or Kiroos or kuriou which speaks of a LORDED OVER institution. And how is Circe pictured in the classical accounts? She is shown holding a golden cup and a harp: she fed drugs (induced by churchy VOODOO) and made them go down by her enchantments or songs which is THE meaning of all arousal forms of singing: reaching a visual and auditory and probably LITERAL orgasm as the Wimber lady and all pagans believed.
Don't, like Cecil, take money for preaching what you don't believe and then turn and rend them. If you don't have a GO button you are a lost sinner. Since the Bible and ALL recorded history including men like John Calvin and Alexander Campbell agree I don't NEED anyone to agree with me. Even Cecil Hook agrees but he defends the MUSICATORS who do exactly what the ANTI-instrumentalists do. He will sell you learning.
I have the example of Jesus, the direct command of Paul and hundreds of years of church history to defend SPEAKING the metrical, ALL INSPIRED text one to another to TEACH and LEARN and go home and live. Add the Lord's Supper and the people who CALLED themseves into SYNAGOGUE, dismiss themselves and the INSTITUTION ceases. Simple: when you ASSEMBLE you SYNAGOGUE: when you DISassemble the assembly DOES NOT EXIST except as elders teaching, deacons expanding outward and members PUTTING INTO PRACTICE what they leaned. SATAN ADDED ALL OF THE REST included a PACK SADDLE to strap on the backs of widows.
You guys want to MUSICATE as the Lucifer Principle or Zoe Principle: to bleed offf worship for YOURSELVES and as TRAFFICERS which the Bible calls PROSTITUTES either rhetorical speakers or singers or musicans all lumped under the SECTARIAN HYPOCRITES Jesus CONDEMNED and refused to speak clearly to strongly DELUDE THEM.
2 Cor 2:17 For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
Kapeleuo (g2585) kap-ale-yoo'-o; from kapelos , (a huckster); to retail, i.e. (by impl.) to adulterate (fig.): - corrupt, sell learning by retail, hawk it about, of prostitutes playing tricks with life
Jesus identified the professionals who USE music and musicians by quoting from both Isaiah and Ezekiel. Here is the MARK of profiteers:
My people come to you, as they usually do,
and sit before you to listen to your words, but they do not put them into practice.
With their mouths they express devotion,
but their hearts are greedy for UNJUST GAIN. Ezek 33:31
Indeed, to them you are NOTHING MORE
than one who sings love (amorous) songs
with a beautiful voice
and plays an instrument well,
for they hear your words
but do not put them into practice. Ezek 33:32
Hdt.1.155 Heredotus: Cyrus told how to take the FIGHT out of the enemy: [4] But pardon the Lydians, and give them this command so that they not revolt or pose a danger to you: send and forbid them to possess weapons of war,
and order them to wear tunics under their cloaks
and knee-boots on their feet,
and to teach their sons lyre-playing [kitharizein]
and song [psallein] and dance
and shop-keeping [huckstering].
And quickly, O king, you shall see them become women instead of men,
so that you need not fear them, that they might revol"
There is no KNOWN exception to the RULE that Satan seduced the young and silly how to try to DEFEAT the Living Word using mixed sex choirs and musical instruments. The OBJECT was to lead people into SODOMY. Therefore the totality of the Literature sees the LEVITICAL WARRIOR MUSICIANS turned over to worship the STARRY HOSTS, prostitutes who prowled ALL temples, priesthoods and clergy of all stripes who were Sodomites. The quoted passage from Exekiel shows people SEEKING such love from God Himself and from Ezekiel.
Nice thing about an HONEST FORUM, everyone gets the FREEDOM to TEACH which you RETAILERS resent murderously just lke the silversmiths of old. The difference is that YOU are the little brass idol and Revelation 18:22 assignes all of th crafty CRAFTSMEN to have their lights BLOWN OUT and the candlestick removed. I say quite confidently that the LAMPS HAVE BEEN removed from most institutions. I notice that Christian Chronicles, the ORGAN (he, he) of the changelings promoting the COUP of "christian churches" using JUDAS GOATS at Tulsa Workout for Soul Selling, warns that NO ONE should read the WEB PAGES discussing this issue.
The latest which I will try to keep up to date for the DISCIPLES which excludes those SELLING EDUCATION AT RETAIL which God gave us FREE OF CHARGE (Isa 55) and BLINDED the prostitutes (Isa 48) to put a LIMIT on the retailers power. If Donnie or Ken begins sending you a TITHING bill or try to DISCIPLINE or SHEPHERD you all through the week THEN you can do your WHINEY PINEY ACT. Otherwise, if you are into MUSICATING claiming to worship a Spirit God who can ONLY be worshipped in the HUMAN spirit as it GIVES HEED (Paul's only worship word) to the Words of Christ which ARE Spirit and Life, then you have the MARK OF CAIN on your forehead (mind) and hand (your works). Since God made it perfectly clear that He CANNOT and WILL NOT be worshipped in a HOUSE BUILT BY HUMAN HANDS--even a multi Billion dollar Mega-church, then when someone wants to steal food from your children's plate to build a HOUSE OF WORSHIP then you know that Satan (Apollyon) has STRUCK like lightenig for ALL the world to see.
Ken does a hail Mary and FREES you from "churchianity" and PAYING the unlawful LAW OF GIVING. You are set free from some HIRED HAND intending to place you into a DISCIPLING DILEMA so they can keep track of you, get you to spill your guts in PRAYER CIRCLES or discipling meeting, store it on the computer and USE IT AGAINST you if you upset the WASPS. So, says Erasmus the priest who should know.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.70.156
Tradition vs. Doctrine in the Church of Christ
February 25 2006, 11:49 PM
Concerned Christian has said on several occasions that the church of Christ holds up its "traditions" as New Testament "doctrine." Another way of saying it would be that we allegedly hold up our preferences as NT principles. Perhaps CC would make a list of what "traditions" we pass off as NT "doctrine" so that we may reconsider those areas.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: Tradition vs. Doctrine in the Church of Christ
February 28 2006, 1:49 AM
Here are a few...
Well for instance the ignorance of exegetical study. We have some of the most unedcated arguments based on what "Granddad" said (we would not want to offend his interpretations).
Doctrine vs. Tradition
1. This will come as shock to you "Instrumental Music
2. Ignoring Context.
3. Holy Spirit and how it works.
4. Altering the Vocabulary in Scripture and basing assumptions upon things.
5. Pick and choose verse religion. We stand and argue one thing to the letter (Instruments which is not even said to be evil), but we turn and argue something off as not meaning that (women covering their heads).
6. Church attendance is the means to Heaven.
7. Women's Roles (shut up and sit down, but it is OK to talk in class and express an opinion as long as you don't teach someone)
8. Buildings
9. How we dress
10.Lifting Hands in Worship
11.Demeaning Christians that are in other buildings on Sunday (i.e. Preaching Hate and sectarianism)
12.Communion only on Sunday when in fact Eutichas fell out the Window and they Broke again (after Midnight) We conveniantly stop reading the part after Acts 20:7. Keep reading and don't give me the Jewish calendar garbage.
13.Clapping in a Worship setting
14.Having Potlucks in Buildings
15.Having a Headquarters; When we have a question or debate we should pack up and go to Jerusalem and meet with the council of leaders.
16.Why denominate ourselves with a Name
17.KJV being the only means to salvation all the others lead you to Hell
18.Having a minister...and paying them
19.Praise Teams or Multiple Song Leaders are bad but a Song Leader is OK.
20.Solos. Putting music to words is wrong, but praying (which is a solo) is OK.
21.Men only serving Communion however, just this morning in church a lady in front of us leaned up in her pew and handed the tray to the people in front of her. (I guess that is OK since she technically never got up out of her pew and kept a piece of her rear on the seat)
22.Christian Radio sations are wrong, but the Rock/Country stations are OK.
23.The overuse of Nadab and Abihu and they are in the Old Testament!
24.A lack of understanding Culture of People in the Bible.
25.Toilets in the church. The eraly 20th Century Church really struggled over that but I dare say your church does not have an outhouse.
26.Must watch Jewel Miller before you can become a Christian.
27.Scare the Heck out of you and make God Difficult to understand.
28.A Church of Knowing about God and Memorization, but not truly Knowing Him and Becoming His Children.
29.Greeting one another with a Handshake or a Holy Kiss?
30.Unity vs. Conformity
31.Speaking of Solos again...We carry on about how eloquent one's words where in the prayer, but how entertaining the words and sounds were in a solo/song. Mind Boggling.
32.Having a pitch pipe to get the right pitch is acceptable, but an organ is Hellish.
In developing such issues, we have become hair-splitters serving a God of quibbles. Sincerely, but being either ignorant or intellectually dishonest, we have twisted and misapplied Scriptures to support our contentions. We have become fixed in the tracks of dogmatism. God's purposes in His directives have been overshadowed by emphasis on lawful requirements. Binding incidental details often has become more important than the love without which we cannot be bound together. Doctrine, instead of the Savior, has become our center. The binding of scruples has limited the liberties of others. We have not trusted others with the freedom which Christ gives. We have become judgmental and exclusive and have given ourselves a name to distinguish ourselves from others. God's grace has been limited to our achievement. We continue not only to divide but also to prevent the only true unity. Unless we change our perspective, we shall continue on this ill-fated course.
I doubt you will reconsider any of these, but I use to have sever hang ups on them too. However did as you requested and named a few.
(no login) 4.153.65.216
OSCAR of the year.
February 28 2006, 11:29 AM
You know, the one what lives in the TRASH CAN.
We have polled everyone and vote you the most ignorable man of the year.
Congratulations, you will receive out Coloring Book, Card Class, Slow ones in the Slow group by Oops any day.
While waiting you may want to go out and bust some knee caps of widows trying to cross the street.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.64.160
CC's "List"
February 28 2006, 12:17 PM
All of the items have been previously addressed on this web site in one thread or another. It would only perpetuate the Fruity Loop to discuss them yet again, as we have the musical issue. If CC, who worships in the true faith known as the church of Christ (as opposed to denominations like Baptist or Methodist, for example, and who BTW hides behind an alias ), sees these as faults in the c of C, then he should rectify them or find a denomination that is not "guilty" of them. Why stay in a church that he has discarded as "dying" and full of "error"? It apparently gives him much satisfaction to come on this web site and drag through the mud what he perceives as "problems" in his own c of C faith and rail and jeer over them.
The bottom line to everything on CC's "list": Follow the New Testament to the letter in all things. DO accept what is written therein; DON'T fret over what is absent. Don't add to it, don't take from it, don't second-guess it, don't assume anything for or against it, don't pick and choose over it, and don't waste time making up lists based on your prejudices and preferences about it.JUST OBEY IT.
(no login) 195.175.37.8
Where's the doctrine?
February 28 2006, 1:24 PM
Concerned Christian writes: "...we have become hair-splitters serving a God of quibbles. Sincerely, but being either ignorant or intellectually dishonest, we have twisted and misapplied Scriptures to support our contentions.
Read "In the beginning, God..."
When God created, where was man?
When God decreed, where was man?
When God ordained, where was man?
When God commanded, where was man?
There are some "preachers" of today who teach that "we" are "partners" with God! When we worship, give, do good works, we are partnering with God. Since we are "partners" with God we have a say in how the "partnership" goes. This, of course, is false teaching. We are not "partners" with God in that since. We are disciples of Christ!
As a "disciple" of Christ one must follow His teachings. Your list of 31 seem to me to be no more than "mud" thrown onto a wall to see if any will stick. We can began with point one, Instrumental music.
Instrumental music. Did you know that the New Testament names 22 different congregations. Of these 22 congregation there is not one mention that any of them used "instrumental music!"
If we should use instrumental music in today's congregation, which of the 22 congregation, that we read of in the New Testament, would we be following?
In Christ,
Jimmyt
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
CC's list of questions - Part II
March 12 2006, 4:26 PM
Part II of CC's list of questions. Again, I'm amazed at some of his items and have never even heard
a couple of them. I believe he has been listening to some old, angry ex-member who has either made up stuff or his memory has become questionable at best.
Anyway, here goes Part II...
13.Clapping in a Worship setting -
I'm sorry, but why do I have to have my singing interrupted by clapping? What does it do? What is it meant for? Why is it done? To glorify God? No...He doesn't care, he has asked to hear us sing and make music with our heart. To teach each other with song. To sing together as one. Clapping is for man and man only. However, clapping was used in pagan religions at that time and as such, was highly frowned upon by the early Christians as a way to infiltrate the Church with paganism. Hmm...sound familiar?
14.Having Potlucks in Buildings
It's a building not Christ's Church! We are supposed to fellowship together. This was NEVER a mainstream church issue, only a few anti's believed such. They were by far the minority. Again, you are showing us that your learning this stuff from someone who is either angry and lying or was never really a member of the mainstream c of C.
15.Having a Headquarters; When we have a question or debate we should pack up and go to Jerusalem and meet with the council of leaders.
Christ is our headquarter. The Bible is our guide and with it we need nothing else. What is your point here? Nowhere in the NT does it teach about meeting at a council of leaders for all the churches. Each church had their own elders...
16.Why denominate ourselves with a Name
We don't have a name...that shows how much you really know about the members of the c of C. There is no name. It is mearly a church of Christ. Not Church of Christ. Hence the small c. Other's have made it a "name" to identify us. Why do we need another name. What could be more correct that members of the church of Christ?
17.KJV being the only means to salvation all the others lead you to Hell.
What? Hello....are we even on the same planet?
18.Having a minister...and paying them
Wow, now this is an issue? You are aware that there were Apostles and Disciples that traveled between the churches, staying and teaching for long periods of time. They took nothing with them except the clothes on their backs because the Church was to cloth, feed and house them? Their job was to get the churches up and running where there were leaders that could start teaching. Can I ask how this is any different than today's preacher? Are we not clothing, feeding and housing them as they give up a normal life to teach the Word of God?
Luke 10: 1- 7 Clearly has Jesus sending out seventy disciples to proclaim the gospel, he tells them to take no provisions; rather, they were to enjoy the hospitality of their students, the reason being, “the laborer is worthy of his hire”
19.Praise Teams or Multiple Song Leaders are bad but a Song Leader is OK.
This one cracks me up. Its so illogical. Ummmm...have you ever heard of a group of people knowing to all start off singing at the same exact time without at least one person beginning the first couple of notes? Its not possible. There is ALWAYS a song leader, whether up front in a pulpit or sitting in a group. Always.
Someone has to start off first. That's all a song leader is. The one to start it off and keep it orderly. To make sure everyone knows where the song is going. To keep discord out of the assembly and to add unity to our assembly. They are not up there to make the song more lovely for God or for us. They are keeping order. They are giving everyone the path to follow in song so that we all sing in one accord, together as God commanded. They are singing with us and not against us or by themselves.
20.Solos. Putting music to words is wrong, but praying (which is a solo) is OK.
As the answer to this will take up a lot of space, I have found a study on the topic that clarifies the issues some of the "change agents" are trying to make. For more info, go to the following website.
21.Men only serving Communion however, just this morning in church a lady in front of us leaned up in her pew and handed the tray to the people in front of her. (I guess that is OK since she technically never got up out of her pew and kept a piece of her rear on the seat)
Again, this is childish at best, evil in part. Serving communion and helping move a tray along are not related and cannot be used to make a point. A woman has to touch the tray to partake of her portion...and then pass it on. How does that correlate to "serving communion"? You should be ashamed of yourself. Desperation is a sad thing. Again, Paul and Timothy have made their commands, which were inspired by God, and I for one have no problem obeying them. If you wish to take away from the Word, do so, but don't attend a c of C.
22.Christian Radio sations are wrong, but the Rock/Country stations are OK.
What? What you listen to must be evaluated for Christianity - it doesn't matter what type of radio station it is. I personally can't stand the Christian songs out today - most of them are HipHop or R&B. What happened to something like a good ole' Nickelback type song...If I could just remove a cuss word here or there, life would be so much easier. I can't wait till you can beep words from the radio like you can with the new TV gadgets. However, I do like Amy Grant and some others. I just buy their tapes.
23.The overuse of Nadab and Abihu and they are in the Old Testament!
I can't even remember the last time I heard about them. However, the point of that story is that they disobeyed God by adding to that which he had already ordained. Same as the man who touched the ark to try and save it from falling. These weren't evil men, but still they were destroyed by God. The same God that now hears your prayers and will be the judge of all things.
He hasn't changed. HE didn't have an epiphany during Christ's death that told him to give up his "tough" ways and be a God of mercy only. He was a God of mercy then as much as he is now. Did he not forgive his people time after time? Did he not let them be enslaved or slaughtered for their transgressions, yet turn around and save them? He is a jealous God and will judge those who fail to follow his Word.
You try and take away his power and make him a simple God. That's one dimensional and it takes away from who God really is. He is complex, he is all knowing, all seeing, all powerful and does NOT like his people to thwart his commands. Mercy is given, but only up to a point and then it can be lost. You have made up a mythical God, one that is weak and conflicted, who doesn't believe his own inspired Word, who has put aside his vengeance and jealousy. You have changed the idea of Him.
He who was and always will be - has not changed.
24.A lack of understanding Culture of People in the Bible.
That would be your problem...You seem to have no clue as to what the early Christians believed are how they behaved. If you did, you would have to drop most of your "tradition" issues.
25.Toilets in the church. The eraly 20th Century Church really struggled over that but I dare say your church does not have an outhouse.
Actually, you lack of history is showing here. Have you seen the nice latrines the Roman's had in nearly every city? Quite nice actually. If you want, you can research it on the internet. They have pictures of the actual latrines. They weren't as miserable as you seem to think. It was just their normal way of life. My mother grew up without a bathroom as a child. It wasn't a big deal.
26.Must watch Jewel Miller before you can become a Christian.
Who is Jewel Miller? No one I know has ever even seen him/her. I'm a preacher's kid and have been a member of many c of C's. I've never even heard of this video/tape. Again, you assume so much that is wrong.
27.Scare the Heck out of you and make God Difficult to understand.
I find this so telling...Again, you ignore the many, many verses on fearing God. You don't understand the different types of fear. God's not difficult to understand, unless you start picking and chosing which verses to obey. Then it's a free-for-all, as the "change agents" want it to be. If not, someone will start questioning them and they won't be able to answer. Just like you can't. Instead, you post ridiculous issues to try and get people off track. God is only difficult to understand for those who refuse to obey all his commands and to put aside their own needs.
You do understand the difference between God's wants/needs and your own? Your's don't matter.
28.A Church of Knowing about God and Memorization, but not truly Knowing Him and Becoming His Children.
Wow, now knowledge is a bad thing....I guess Christ was wrong on that issue, too.
29.Greeting one another with a Handshake or a Holy Kiss?
Actually, we usually hug, but hey...you do what you want. It might behove you to understand that the "holy kiss" was not a commandment but a personal request by Paul to his fellow Christians. There is no command made on how we are to say hello to each other. If we do it your way, we will spend at least an hour shaking/kissing each and every member before assembly can begin...We would have to if it is a command. When would we ever get to the actual assembly?
30.Unity vs. Conformity
Ahh..this would be your issue and not ours. We do understand the difference. Unity does not always mean conformity. Unity and Conformity can be wrong if following false teachings. Go back to your earlier questions for more info on this.
31.Speaking of Solos again...We carry on about how eloquent one's words where in the prayer, but how entertaining the words and sounds were in a solo/song. Mind Boggling.
Hmmmm..again you have ignored scriptures that tell us to pray TO each other. Yet the grammatical comments regarding "singing" are to do it as a group, in unity, as one. Of course, you will have to study up on the greek language to get the whole picture on this issue. By the way, Psalms are not always sung, most of the time they are spoken...another thorn in your point.
32.Having a pitch pipe to get the right pitch is acceptable, but an organ is Hellish.
This is almost as silly as your toilet issue. A pitch pipe is NOT an instrument. Have you ever tried to use one? Can't play a song on one. It is only used to help a song leader find the right pitch so that he can start off on the right note. Most don't even use them anymore. I haven't seen one in use for years. However, an organ is an accompaniment. There is a huge difference between the two. The organ can either supercede voices or merge with voices. Either way, the voices become less important and only a part of the voices (and yes, I studied music in college before changing majors) can be ehard. The organ is used to make the song sound better, to hide the the wrong notes sung, to enhance the sound and to enhance the emotions. A pitch pipe is one short note played BEFORE the song begins. It does not add to the song's sound (what differrence does the pitch really mean? You can be off-pitch and the song still sound good), it does not enhance the music, it does not overshadow or merge with the voices, it does not hide poor singing, it does not enhance the emotions of the song. It is merely a tool, as is the song book. (Before you go there...it might interest you to know that the early Christians did have writings with hymns and Psalms, so you can't use that excuse).
God didn't tell us which fork to use or if we should eat sitting up or laying sideways as the early Christians did. That's not important to him. He did ask us to do certain things, sing with our voices, make music with our hearts, not be as the pagans, etc...So argue all you want about those silly little points. You're just trying to hide your ignorance of other scriptures behind a mask of confusion. Trying to get us to overlook certain scriptures isn't going to work for long.
Eventually people in the "change agent" churches will begin to question your teachings...
How do I know that? Because, our large area "change agent" churches are beginning to lose members. Our "traditional" churches are gaining new members nearly every week from these larger churches. The reason? The new members state that the preachers are not following even basic scriptures and the Bible is hardly ever really studied. When they ask questions, they can't be answered.
Funny thing is, you go on and on about how the old church is dying. Yet, we've gained nearly 30 families in the last few months from a large church that teaches just like you do...The same is happening to another traditional church 20 minutes away. They are having to start building a larger auditorium. A review of area "change churches" indicates that members that were traditional c of C members prior to the change are starting to questions things and are leaving. Seems that once you get over the enterainment and "feelings of love" there's nothing really there.
As one young married couple told me, "the F. C. c of C isn't really a church. It's a large social gathering with donuts and coffee. As for teaching scripture, that doesn't happen much. We studied books written by others like Max Lucado or our preacher. The actual Bible is barely ever opened and then, only a scripture or two is read. If you question something, you are met by a "shepherd" who tries to convince you that the new way is the right way. It's like the bible no longer matters there. I think what we learned at Harding can't be trusted to be truth. Raising hands and clapping was just for show and was hollow. It was all a lie." Thanks L. Jones for telling us the truth about what is really going on behind the "change agent" movement.
I thank God for the eyes that are starting to be opened. It seems the Word is starting to get out, all of it! The war has just begun...
(no login) 65.1.219.206
Now It’s the “Senior Pulpit Minister’s” Turn
March 6 2006, 8:05 AM
It was another one of those lively, charismatically-induced contemporary musical gatherings this past Sunday. Let me count 1, 2, 3 … 14 mostly CCM pieces, some of which were made popular by money-and-fame-driven “Christian Rock” artists.
“Let us worship the Father … sing your praise to the Father … lift your hands to the Father….” What about it? It might as well have been led by some irreverent atheist who knows nothing about worshipping the Father in spirit and in truth. When the abominable rhythmic handclapping (that only a handful of folks do) is about to reach the point of extinction, the MUSICAL “worship leader” has a way of reviving it.
This concert director has subtly convinced just about everyone [it seems] that the gathering of the saints is all about MUSIC and performances—shall we say 40-50 minutes of MUSIC? [Frankly, I have a major concern for seniors who have to remain standing for long minutes at a time—and until the “director” cues for the weary to sit down. This probably explains why folks resort to clapping and swaying to the music to keep body parts from numbing.]
“Come to the Table” was sung before the Communion. “Come to the table of mercy, prepared with the wine and the bread. All who are hungry and thirsty come and your souls will be fed. Come at the Lord’s invitation, receive from His nail-scarred hand. Eat of the bread of salvation, drink of the blood of the Lamb.” Well?
At this time, the speaker delivered a lengthy message much more on the resurrection than on the sacrifice and death of our Savior [perhaps as some sort of preparation for the “interactive Easter drama worship” coming up]. During the bread portion, the CHOIR hummed in 4-part harmony “O Sacred Head Now Wounded.” Must I explain that no intelligible words were uttered during the humming and that I was trying to figure out which verse “the choir” was humming? I was also wondering how they partook of the bread while holding the microphone and reading the sheet music. The choir members didn’t do any handclapping—that was one less effort in their multi-tasking. No—the humming was not displayed on the screen. However, during the partaking of the cup, the choir performed the singing of the second verse that was displayed on the screen.
Oops … lest I forget—here’s Phil, the animated speaker. Due to time restraints, this will be brief.
Phil’s speech was titled: “Espresso Yourself: Pull out the Plank.” References used: Matthew 7:1-5; Hebrews 3:13. His main points were: (1) A critical spirit is cold-blooded; (2) Criticism is a highly infectious disease; (3) A critical spirit is also blinding; (4) Once we allow Jesus to pull the plank out of our lives, two things happen: (4.a) We can see the mercy of God; (4.b) We can extend the mercy of God.
Most are familiar with the passage concerning: “How can you think of saying, ‘Let me help you get rid of the speck in your eye,’ when you can’t see past the plank in your own eye? Hypocrite. First get rid of the plank in your own eye….” [quoting the NIV—the official version at MCC]. So, that needs no further explanation.
Beware, ConcernedMembers! The preacher mentioned the word “legalistic.” Remember that this is the buzz word among change agents—a deceitful defense mechanism, the last resort, the misused word attributed to those who do not go along with them. He mentioned the expressions “habitual fault finder … withstanding your own scrutiny … bitter … negative … judgmental … the ‘chat room’ … etc.”
Well, it appears that Mr. Phil Barnes has spent time here and has learned how serious the situation is when a congregation delves into and implements unnecessary and destructive changes that incite controversy and alienate half of its members. Let’s just turn it around instead—i.e., the Change Movement is the highly infectious spiritual disease.
Donnie
Judge Knott (no login) 199.227.205.202
Paying customers only at Madison
March 6 2006, 8:50 AM
This coming Saturday will be the circus for Jesus at Madison. By the way Donnie, Chuck Sonn ask what you thought about Phil's sermon yesterday. He now has your answer with the above post.
It's paying customers only at Madison this Saturday! It seems like car washes, yard sales, putting on shows, all for Jesus, is the way Madison encourages it's young (and old) people to go.
Madison does not teach, "If a man don't work, don't let him eat", as the Apostle's doctrine teaches.
Anyone care to offer an explaination as to why Madison chooses the yard sales and car washes to provide support for their entertainers?
I notice the Marcher gave a full page to Chuck Sonn, their truck stop minister. I thought I had read on one web site that he is confused with his understanding of God's word. I read that Chuck did not understand the difference between the Baptist and the Mormons and that he believes that people who follow Budda are saved. Can you set me straight on his teachings?
(no login) 68.19.253.170
Circus—“[Literally 360-Degree] Turning Mourning into Dancing”
March 7 2006, 8:27 AM
Remember the “Vision 2000” massive construction project? The [almost an entirely new generation of] leaders “must” do something about the indebtedness, especially since many of the supporting cast of widows and other senior citizens have left. After the upheaval of 2001, I think the project was upgraded to “Vision YYYY” [a different year, BTW].
Yes, I knew about Chuck’s question at the other forum. In fact, I responded to it as soon as I found the thread about me. You should read his response and all the subsequent “negative” responses and criticisms. Ironically, [he missed some major but misguided accusations when] the preacher mentioned “legalistic” and the “chat room,” etc. His response to my question was that he and many others were also targeted in the speech. Mr. Sonn is also among those who frequently accuse those who stand firm in God’s truth as being legalistic. So, try to make sense out of this—is he, as well as any of the others, an admitted “legalist” per his understanding of the speech?
Judge K, please e-mail me sometime, if you don’t mind.
Donnie
(no login) 4.152.99.47
Hypocrites PERFORM, Pharisees PREACH, Both for PROFIT
March 6 2006, 1:37 PM
EFFEMINATE "worship" breeds only effeminate "converts." They DO NOT reproduce. SO, don't let them threaten you.
Their SCHEME for their SCAM is to drive YOU Into dissociation and they boast about SCHIZOPHRENIA. That makes you MORTALLY AFRAID to argue or speak like an old LEGALISTS who will not perform the OLDEST, most legalistic, paganistic, superstitious and perverted rituals known to all ancient "prophets" who WORKED real hard to bring about a visual or auditory ORGASM with the demons to make you PAY them.
Sounds like Preacher-Creature is radically DISSOCIATED or he would not be ATTACKING people for bleeding on them when they are SHOT. I hope he realizes that his CAREER PATH has been squeezed into a very NARROW field.
If they are a RHETORICIAN or sOPHISts (serpent), singer, musician or "theater builder and stage manager" or GRINDER (musical prostitute) they BY DEFINITION they are performing SORCERY and are both a PARASITE and a HYPOCRITE.
If you GET MONEY form widows and honest workers to MAKE UP your sermons so that you DO NOT have to teach the Songs and Sermons of God in Christ then BY DEFINITION you are a PHARISEE.
Panourg-os
A. ready to do anything, wicked, knavish. There is a lot of information for DISCIPLES but I will just quote: LXX Pr.21.11 ; -esteros Plu.2.395c : Sup. -otatos Ar.Eq.45 , Lys. l.c.
Proverbs 21:10 The soul of the wicked desireth evil: his neighbour findeth no favour in his eyes.
Proverbs 21:11 When the scorner is punished, the simple is made wise: and when the wise is instructed, he receiveth knowledge.
Proverbs 21:12 The righteous man wisely considereth the house of the wicked: but God overthroweth the wicked for their wickedness.
"Drama works because WE KNOW THAT IT ISN'T TRUE." If people wanted to TEACH "that which is written" they would not use the HYPOCRITICAL ARTS and make two or three removes from the facts. The only motive is to DECEIVE in order to RECEIVE the food of hard working honest people: ALL RELIGIOUS PERFORMERS ARE BY JESUS AND ALL RESOURCES CALLED HYPOCRITES.
Panourgos II. in a less positively bad sense, cunning, clever, smart, .. te kai SOPHOS Pl.R.409c ; kompsos kai p. Plu. 2.28a : kai hupokritikôs legein
Plato, the SOPHIST Theaetetus: Socrates
[177a] through their unrighteous acts they are made like the one and unlike the other. They therefore pay the penalty for this by living a life that conforms to the pattern they resemble; and if we tell them that, unless they depart from their "cleverness," the blessed place that is pure of all things evil will not receive them after death, and here on earth they will always live the life like themselves--evil men associating with evil--when they hear this, they will be so confident in their unscrupulous cleverness that they will think our words the talk of fools.
Theodorus: Very true, Socrates.
[177b] Socrates
Yes, my friend, I know. However, there is one thing that has happened to them: whenever they have to carry on a personal argument about the doctrines to which they object, if they are willing to stand their ground for a while like men and do not run away like cowards, then, my friend, they at last become strangely dissatisfied with themselves and their arguments; their brilliant RHETORIC withers away, so that they seem no better than CHILDREN. But this is a digression. Let us turn away from these matters--if we do no
The SOPHIST enfolds the word OPHIS which is the SERPENT in the book of Revelation. He/She is the NACHASH or serpent or MUSICAL PERFORMER in the garden of Eden. That is why the king/queen of TYRE is called the "singing and harp playing prostitute." As WISDOM or SOPHIA she is the mother of ZOE and the "little dumb jehovah." ZOE is identified as the evil sister of the LOGOS (Jesus) and is therefore LUCIFER.
So SOPHIA is called the SERPENT and ZOE is called "the beast and female instructing principle." A Hypocritical speaker is one who PERFORMS "beyond the sacred page" and beyond "whispering or conversational language" which is the definition of the Latin SERMO. The OPPOSITE of Paul's speak includes shouting, singing, playing instruments and ALL of the hypocritical skills.
Hupo-kritikos Legein is PERFORMANCE PREACHING
A. belonging to hupokrisis 11 , skilled therein, esti phuseôs to hu. einai having a good delivery,
2. suited for speaking or delivery, lexis (sc. TECHNE) the art of delivery, Arist.Rh. 1404a13, Po.1456b10, al. but, the actor's art,
The CRAFTSMEN or TECHNE in Revelation 18:22 will all go back into Hell with Apollyon who unleashed the MUSES or LOCUSTS to separate people according to MARKS.
3. metaph., acting a part, pretending to
The word LEGO 8. of orators, to speak (emphatically), 9. to boast of, tell of, Komizou or the naked comedy.
It is about impossible to get a preaching job these days unless you are one of the Jesus-condemned Doctors of the Law and are SOPHISTS having a HYPOCRITIKOS form of deliveray because you cannot TRAFFICK the free water of the Word.
A HYPOCRITE is a PERFORMING ARTISTS. If you want to USE the histrionic arts then ALL of the Bible and history proves that you are MOVED by Lucifer or ZOE because you have to take your eyes and ears off God and His word to WORSHIP the performers.
Hupokrinôreply, make answer
[The Hebrew ANAH or RESPONSIVE SINGING means to AFFLICT and named after Anath]
B 2. expound, interpret, explain [outlawed by Peter as further expounding] II. Att., speak in dialogue, hence play a part on the stage, be an actor, kômôidian, of orators and rhetoricians, represent dramatically, use histrionic arts, exaggerate, represent in art, ape, mimic,
Rhêtor-ikos , ê, on, oratorical, hê rhêtorikê (sc. technê). These are the craftsmen lumped with the singers, musicians and "grinder" doing merchandise in the house of prayer. Rev. 18:22
Mim-êtês Mimic was always associated with perversion along with singing with instruments.
A. imitator, tinôn ib.1.6.3, cf. Hp.Vict.1.22, 1 Ep.Cor.4.16; hoi m. tôn grammatôn forgers, [Paul said IMITATE me and Paul never sang in church or PLAYED]
II. Artist (cf. mimêsis 11 ), Pl.R.602a, al.; esp. one who impersonates characters, as an actor or poet,
2. coupled with goês, mere actor, impostor, Pl.R.598d, cf. Plt.303c, Sph.235a.
4. metaph., play a part, feign, pretend, ib.287, LXX Si.1.29, al.; hu. ton basilikon take the king's part, play the king
Musical and drama teams CLAIM to have the power of THE KING to lead you into the presence of God. All pagan hypocrites knew that the AGENT of the gods always got the money and the pleasure "as the harem of the gods."
They are NOT God's annointeds: they are NOT celestial beings: they have NO office in the EKKLESIA or church of Christ. They are STEALING from the POOR when Paul gave them a PATTERN and a DIRECT command defined by MOST of historical theologians: "If they WILL NOT work then NEITHER SHALL THEY EAT." No, not even at the Love Feasts where files and parasites gather. Never let this planned PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE keep you from YOUR office which is LEGAL while their's is LEGALISTIC, SECTARIANIZING, PATTERNISTIC and a MARK of their DOOM.
Concerned Christian (no login) 70.177.30.24
Re: Now It’s the “Senior Pulpit Minister’s” Turn
March 6 2006, 10:12 PM
As you say to others...if you don't like it, go somewhere else!
(no login) 72.154.193.190
Somewhere else?
March 6 2006, 11:53 PM
No! If you intrude, go somewhere else or start your own from scratch!
Sorry, but I arrived first. The change agents ignored the signs: “OCCUPIED” and “NO VACANCY.” They also ignored other signs: “YOU WERE NOT INVITED” and “GO AWAY! ”
Frankly, I believe you are “concerned” that your non-instrumental congregation is not changing as you wish it would. If that’s the case, go somewhere else where the inanimate musical instruments could participate in admonishing you and others, as well as in letting the word of Christ dwell in you richly.
Concerened Christian (no login) 70.182.0.5
Re: Somewhere else?
March 7 2006, 1:22 PM
You were the first? You helped open the doors to Madison in 1934? You obviously are not 'fitting in" so why subject yourself to such turmoil? You are "Outnumbered" go somewhere else. Donnie, You base the Christian Walk as something you do or don't do on a Sunday event. "IF" it is that bad why not go to some 83 other church of Christ options in the Nashville area? What are you doing in the week that is helping grow the Kingdom? Please do not say posting on this website.
By the way...You are so presumptuous to think that I am saying we have to have instruments in the Churches of Christ. I have said all along and will continue to say that I DO NOT believe it is a salvation issue and to continue to read into it is ludicrous. You hear someone say that instruments are not a salvation issue and you think that we are saying we MUST have them or else.
Change Agents have been around for years...it is called the Restoration. You sir are a change agent and probably sent the Concerned Members before you into a dimension of irritation. Having things like Bathrooms, Pitch Pipes, and Fellowship Halls (and tons more) are of no concern to you, but others those were true changes and hurt the dynamic of those folks spirits. You looked at it as stupid and dumb to argue, but they saw it as real changes that were divisive in the church. This is true today, we have continued to change and now you have assumed the role of the previous Concerned Members. I pray that God will soften hearts and realize that we are arguing opinions and interpretations and get back to recognizing that Jesus is the Answer.
Once change is inevitable the Message of Jesus and His Saving Grace has not changed, but the Methods in which we teach Him must and Has changed. People all over the World are accepting Jesus as something real and something they can grasp. Why are you so angry about that? Recognize that God is directing people to change and your opinions of how a Worship service is to go is an OPINION. I know I know, you do not see it that way, but it is becoming more glaring every time you post "What Happened at Madison Part 10."
(no login) 68.19.223.86
Church Division and Being Outnumbered
March 9 2006, 5:54 AM
To Concerned About …?
I had only a brief response to your nonsensical statement about me going somewhere else. Believe me: it’s NEVER between me and the members of the congregation. Rather, it is between me and the change agents—along with their trained disciples and leaders operating in the congregation.
No!!! I am not outnumbered—(1) there is the segregated group of members which assembles early and this group has been labeled “traditional” by the divisive contemporary leaders. (2) And there are still many members in the other division—the “contemporary”—who have nothing to do with the theatrics, performances and entertainment; and who are very knowledgeable of the truth and can easily discern when the doctrine of Christ is being perverted. The basis for being outnumbered is certainly NOT according to the utterance of “Hallelujah!” and “Praise the Lord” measured in decibels. I know you have heard about “the silent majority.”
You are putting words in my mouth—I NEVER base the Christian walk on the Sunday event. And you ask what I am “doing in the week that is helping grow the Kingdom”? Well, I know what you are doing in trying to destroy the kingdom—yes … you are dividing the church by constantly and consistently clamoring for unnecessary and controversial changes and by advocating your borrowed agenda coming from all directions.
Change agents and the Restoration Movement—you say? So ludicrous a statement that I would not even begin to make a comment! You are so desperate for even the weakest argument to support your agenda.
Sorry, but I arrived first. The change agents ignored the signs: “OCCUPIED” and “NO VACANCY.” They also ignored other signs: “YOU WERE NOT INVITED” and “GO AWAY! ”
Sorry, again, that the above remarks really got on your nerves, eh! Your laughable response—“You were the first? You helped open the doors to Madison in 1934?” Good job on your research! The sad part, though, is that you failed to grasp that I was contrasting myself with the contemporary change agents. Now, you really have to guess my age. Plus, your fellow change agents weren’t born then—not likely.
Your arguments concerning musical instruments have gotten pretty rancid. Whether IM is a salvation issue or not, it is a divisive issue—it has split the church before, and why not prevent the split from splitting further? Hmmm … hmmm … hmmm?!! And your list of “things”—air conditioning, bathrooms and toilet paper, pitch pipes, … … … … … … I think you might as well make the list complete—just look around you and include all the objects in sight.
Frankly, everyone is tired of your hypocrisy—loving one another, God’s grace, the message of Jesus—only God knows everyone’s heart. Did you know that truth about God’s omniscience?
We’ve heard enough of your agenda that you have repeated numerous times in this Madison Timeline thread alone. This site is no longer interested in your conglomerate of beliefs and doctrines that you have borrowed or acquired from various religious sources. Your lack of concern for church unity is apparent. Your expressed disloyalty to the church is evident.
The change in methodology in presenting the truth has NEVER been an issue. The change in doctrines and beliefs as revealed in the Holy Scripture is the issue. The church growth scheme [or SCAM] is the issue.
Finally, your generic alias “Concerned Christian” is an issue because this website is named “ConcernedMembers.” From all of your posts, it is clear that you are a devoted agent of the Change Scheme. We do not support your agenda. We do not want our readers to think that we agree with your agenda just because you have identified yourself as “Concerned Christian.” It is only fair to ask you to use another identity—better yet … your true identity—before your future posts will be considered.
Donnie
Concerned Minister (no login) 70.190.195.170
Wow! You're Important
March 11 2006, 11:12 AM
I had no idea the owners of this website had a copyright on the word "Concerned". Better change my name!
Concerned Christian: I will be shocked if this posting ever sees the light of day, but just in case it does, I want to encourage you. Your postings have inspired me, and shined a lot of light in the dark places of the church. That last one really touched a nerve with ole' Donnie. In part of his tantrum he said:
"Your lack of concern for church unity is apparent. Your expressed disloyalty to the church is evident."
Allow me to translate: "You are trying to stop us from fracturing the church into thousands of pieces. We can no longer argue with you using scripture, so we will ignore you, like we do everyone else who makes sense on this site."
Donnie: Go back and read this posting that I am responding to. Look what you have turned into. It's sad. You used to be able to participate in mature discussion. I used to enjoy reading it. Now it just depresses me.
(no login) 65.1.221.216
No ... I do not own the website
March 11 2006, 6:32 PM
Dear “Concerned Minister”:
Nothing has been said about a copyright on the word “Concerned.” You said that—not I.
But something has been said about the views and opinions of “Concerned Christian”—which, BTW, is a misleading alias that might give the impression of its alignment with the objectives of the “ConcernedMembers” website. I don’t know how else to explain this, but you don’t seem to grasp that many of the messages you have expressed or presented have been negative, derisive, and directed to the church [that you claim to still be a member of] to the point that you despise it and want it changed according to Rick Warren’s Community Church Growth scam. You very seldom provide scriptural evidences, if any, to support many of your acquired beliefs and doctrines.
It’s not about not posting messages that disagree with doctrines, beliefs and teachings of the church—which, to my knowledge, you and others have yet to disprove. If you disagree with any particular doctrine that the church teaches, then, you should present your argument and back it up with scripture. This you haven’t been doing.
Tantrum!?? Good, you are witnessing the tantrum of the church of Jesus Christ—“Change agents, do your conversion somewhere else. Christ’s church does not need restructuring according to the “Community Church” design or blueprint. Leave peaceable congregations alone—they’re OK and will not be divided unless you intrude, interfere and pervert … and then subtly and successfully cause it to divide.”
OK, your above posting has seen the light of day—a tantrum of a “maturing” 33-year old minister. “Concerned Minister” is still not good enough, but it may pass this time. The problem with that is you seem to have no problem identifying yourself to the congregation you minister. But you still have your mask on in your opposition to the church outside of your congregation. Hmmm!
Hopefully, this response doesn’t depress you to the point that a medical prescription will be needed.
Donnie
Concerned Minister (no login) 70.190.195.170
You're Way Off
March 12 2006, 12:47 AM
Donnie,
I don't mean to correct, or embarrass you, but from you posting, you seem to think I am the same person as Concerned Christian. I am not. I am a casual observer of this site and saw the "tantrum" you threw at Concerned Christian, and used the Concerned Minister name to inject a little humor, to make a joke... you didn't get it.
Also, I know you don't have a copyright on "concerned". I was being fecetious. Get a sense of humor.
While I am here though, you did say something that merits addressing:
"Christ’s church does not need restructuring according to the “Community Church” design or blueprint."
The Church of Christ (the one we both know you are talking about) desperately needs restructuring. The community church blue print may not be a bad one to model. It's leading thousands to Christ every year. The traditional Church of Christ is stagnant in growth and evangelism at best. It could use a change. I hope pride won't keep them from it. If that makes me a "change agent", so be it. I just love God's church.
They say, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Donnie... it's broke.
Concerned Minister
(no login) 65.1.221.216
No wonder!
March 12 2006, 1:58 AM
OK! I stand corrected. But I have proven my point. “Concerned Christian” and “Concerned Minister” are identical twins. Frankly, I’m unable to tell ya’ll apart. I don’t know about the “Church of Christ” you both speak of as being “broke” and dying. Maybe, it needs fixin’ by Rick Warren.
The church that I know of is not “broke” and it needs no fixing—thank you. It’s alive and well because “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
In case you’ve been away from each other and need to communicate with each other soon, let me know. I’m quite sure that your twin brother [i.e., unless you’re a female minister] is still keeping up with this site and will be reading this post. He will let me know to give you permission to correspond with him.
My message to Rick Warren’s followers remains unchanged, and every word in it is applicable to you, too. It explains now that “Concerned Minister” wouldn’t be much of a change from “Concerned Christian.”
Donnie
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.69.216
RE: No Wonder
March 12 2006, 9:50 AM
The Concerned Minister/Concerned Christian/Concerned Tom-Dick-Harry type of change agent keeps harping that the traditional church of Christ (the one we all know) needs changing. Yet he seems to ignore the fact that the whole premise of the Change Movement is to change the structure of Christ's church, the one Christ founded over 2,000 years ago, and not just the traditional church of Christ (the one we all know). In other words, the Change Movement says that Christ's Church is "broke," including the traditional church of Christ with it, and man is gonna fix it with a new and improved doctrine and pleasing innovations. This is the whole premise behind Rick Warren and other change gurus who are not rooted in the traditional church of Christ (the one we all know). In other words, the "old" Church is out, and the "new" Church is in.
But the New Testament doesn't say that in the latter days, Christ's Church will have need of repair. That would imply that Christ was weak from the outset. No, the New Testament instead says that false teachers will lure many people away from Christ's Truth (Matt. 7:15, 2 Tim. 4:1-4, 2 Peter 2:1-3 KJV). The Change Movement is doing an excellent job in that regard.
"A healthy church is a growing church" is a catch phrase in the Change Movement. "Numbers and size matter." So, changed churches give people what THEY want, as did Rick Warren (but not necessarily what the New Testament commands), the crowds pour in, and churches "grow." But malignancies also "grow" and may attain significant size; in time, they will seriously compromise or snuff out the lives of the host. And so it is with the malignancy of the Change Movement, which eventually will cause spiritual compromise to those who embrace it.
It's not the Church which requires repair, but the hearts and minds of rebels and renegades in the Change Movement who resist following the New Testament in all things whatsoever Christ has commanded us (Matt. 28:20 KJV).
why? i already left madison turmoil (no login) 172.165.134.63
somewheres else
June 4 2006, 7:40 PM
you and your attitude is exactly the reason i took my family and ran from madison. when i first started in the 1990, i thought madison was where it was at. then your faction decided it was good to disturb the Lord's church. instead of going out on your own, like they used to do, you used the firemarshal as an excuse and came in and bumped us out. ok. and how biblical is that? i dont trust you or your kind. and that goes for keith lancaster and the praise team. you know full well in your heart that instrumental music, dancing, and getting jiggy is not biblical.and i fear it is to follow. to prove the fact at the 10:30 service when steve flatt first revisited, well, where were all the jumpers and hand clappers? was it respect for steve or fear and guilt? either way, the silence of the hand clappers was deaffening and why? because you know you are wrong for doing it.
that's right. we are outnumbered and so were the apsotles. but that didnt stop them from spreading the gospel. paul fought the good fight.
dont think for a minute that you are pulling anything off. your deceipt is apparent.
now, since i probably will not revisit this site ever again because of the deep depression i feel at "christians" quarrleing, go ahead, all of you and persecute me with your gramatical criticisms and justifications for following your true leader. Even he, satan, can quote scripture for his own good. you have assisted him in breaking up one of the greatest bodies of Christ. and look out while we are fighting each other (while the church continues to divide) for the muslims. i pray for all of us that he forgive us for what we do.
i just have one last request: out of respect for Christ, keep the building that we helped fund for so many years, but please change the name.
William (no login) 66.199.28.132
Re: Somewhere else?
March 7 2006, 6:15 PM
Donnie,
I believe that someone did invite them, otherwise they would not be there now.
I do find it funny that you continue to worship in a place and with people that you consider apostate. If it is OK for you, then I can only assume that you believe it does not matter where you worship. It appears the only thing that matters is that your heart is right not the worship or beliefs of the other people around you. Therefore, I can only assume by your example that you believe that any church will do.
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: Somewhere else?
March 7 2006, 8:04 PM
[ . . . . . . . . . ] you [ . . . . . . . . ] then came to Madison in the early 90's. How does this qualify you to say you were here 1st? Sounds leagalist to me!!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: Waiting to identify yourself….
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 68.19.223.86 on Mar 8, 2006 8:37 AM
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Somewhere else?
March 12 2006, 2:59 PM
Concerned Christian - cough, cough...
Your lack of proper education is beginning to show, as is your youth. Just because you have a degree does not mean you learned what Christ taught, as your many erroneous statements have proven. Let's look at your list. I'm cutting into two postings as addressing your issues will take up so much space. I'm going to keep my answers as short as possible for that reason.
CC's list of Doctrine vs. Tradition (and who taught him these were "traditions" and not doctrines? Who failed to tell him that most of these issues were considered "heretical" by the EARLY church elders?)
1. This will come as shock to you "Instrumental Music
Fact: Instrumental music was NOT allowed or used for centuries by ANY Christ based church - true or heretical. Hmm...why is that? Why was it considered the devil's toy? Why did the Roman's find it odd and outrageous that Christian's did not have instruments during their worship? Why was it considered an "addition" that was not needed and could lead the assembly away from Christ. Oh, but wait...that's a new issue today that us "old geezer's" just don't understand.
2. Ignoring Context.
This is exactly what the newly educated are doing. Ignoring page after page of context. CC, you couldn't even address the verse about "narrow is the gate". You could only ignore it. I translated it word for word and you RAN!!!!!! Sad...and you call yourself a preacher. What are you teaching your flock? Nothing?
3. Holy Spirit and how it works.
Since when is this an issue? Oh, right, your led by the HS to ignore scriptures and we should understand that the HS has given you more info than all the other Christians that came before. Your special. Should we bow to you know? Placed yourself on the throne beside God?
4. Altering the Vocabulary in Scripture and basing assumptions upon things.
No, YOU have alterd and/or removed vocabulary. Its what the Change Agents do to avoid truth. Scripture that has been accepted and dealt with for generations is now to be ignored or re-worded.
5. Pick and choose verse religion. We stand and argue one thing to the letter (Instruments which is not even said to be evil), but we turn and argue something off as not meaning that (women covering their heads).
You still haven't read the verses before and after that verse, have you....Speaking of failing to read the context. What about the verse that says her HAIR is her covering. Care to ever address that issue?
6. Church attendance is the means to Heaven.
This is now an issue? We don't have to assemble anymore? I can skip Hbr 10:25 "Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some [is]; but exhorting [one another]: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching." Wow. Thanks for the heads up! And to think that Paul told us that if we loved God we would WANT to meet. That we were to meet and gain in knowledge. So, now I guess I don't have to gain in knowledge anymore. I'll let the change agents think for me...Not!
7. Women's Roles (shut up and sit down, but it is OK to talk in class and express an opinion as long as you don't teach someone)
This shows your complete lack of understanding of Greek and of the early first century customs. I've posted this on another thread so I'm not going to waste my time here. Suffice it to say that this is an elementary subject that seems to have re-opened again this last few years. If one understood Greek even a little, then this should not be in question. What are our teachers teaching today? Nothing? Do you not know who ruled the pagan churches at that time? Do you not know of the issues they had with women trying to take over the church assemblies? Do you not understand rules for assembly vs. outside the assembly? And what' the big deal? I'm a woman and I can handle it, why can't you? Afraid to obey Paul's and Timothy's teachings? Going to X out those verses, too?
8. Buildings
This is a joke. HELLO!!!! What is a house? Is it not a buiilding? Where did the Saints meet? Houses....come to mind? Hmmm...since our houses are big enough today, why would it matter if someone used a building? I can't even imagine how this is an issue.
9. How we dress - that may be your issue, but not mine. Modesty and adequate covering are still required. Looking like a prostitute is still a sin. Dressing to be provocative or to show off your assests is wrong. What do people in your church wear?
10.Lifting Hands in Worship - again, what is the issue here? You do uderstand that their lifting of hands on today's lifting of hands is different? They didn't lift theirs up to the sky and try to show off who is the more "spiritual" christian as some of our nondenominational members attempt to do. Again, read your Greek and study your ancient customs before discussing this subject.
11.Demeaning Christians that are in other buildings on Sunday (i.e. Preaching Hate and sectarianism)
Hmmmm...more verses to ignore. You are actually stating that following God's commands is a tradition and not doctrinal? Really?
***1Cr 6:2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
***1 Cr 5:11-13 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat. For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
***Rom 15:14 And I myself also am persuaded of you, my brethren, that ye also are full of goodness, filled with all knowledge, able also to admonish one another.
***2Ti 4:1-5 I charge [thee] therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.
***1Ti 5:20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
***Tts 1:13 -14 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
***Tts 2:15 These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.
Let me see...the gist of these (and many more) seems to state that I am to stand on the UNCHANGING TRUTH and to rebuke/admonish those that don't. I'm to WATCH for false teachers and tell others of the Truth. So...if I know brethern at a fellow church are in error, I'm now to ignore God? If I know false teachers are starting to infiltrate churches with their false teachings, I'm to shut up?
Isn't that convenient for you and your ilk?
12.Communion only on Sunday when in fact Eutichas fell out the Window and they Broke again (after Midnight) We conveniantly stop reading the part after Acts 20:7. Keep reading and don't give me the Jewish calendar garbage.
Again, your lack of greek is showing. The only verse that even remotely can be twisted to state they took the LS on daily basis is Acts 2: 46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat [food] with gladness and singleness of heart.”
However, a study of basic greek CLEARLY shows that the only item that the word "daily" was associated with (modifier) in the sentence was "with one accord in the temple". It is grammatically incorrect to attribute the word daily to the reast of the sentence. Furthermore, one would understand that the word used here for "breaking bread" is the use for the common meal and not the specific Lord Supper. This is and ELEMENTARY error in translation.
Jackson: The word “food” translates the Greek trophe, which essentially means nourishment (Danker, et al., Greek-English Lexicon, 2000, p. 1017). The term (employed some sixteen times in the Greek New Testament) is never used of the communion, for such was not designed to nourish the physical body.
Furthermore, early writings by Didache and other early church leaders show that the LS was only taken on the First Day of the Week, yet the bretheren did meet more often to study and be together. As do we on Wednesdays and other sundry meetings throughout the week.
See the next posting for the rest of the list....
Sethy (no login) 198.146.157.173
well
March 8 2006, 1:22 AM
i just had an amazing epiphany, none of this matters. all of this boils down to another discussion all together. this is all about Sunday morning worship, why don't you address something like...if I'm in my basement on a Tuesday evening, just playing on my guitar, is it evil? Am I committing a sin by simply "psallos" (plucking, sorry I can't conjugate Greek) on my six string? if my whole life should be one big praise to God then is it wrong to play an instrument at any time? I'm sure Kenny will say "yes" and then say something about pan, and flute girls, and seducing little boys so why doesn't someone with a shred of coherency reply to this. Donnie, or another "not-Ken?"
(no login) 67.32.211.131
Plucking what?
March 15 2006, 8:24 AM
Sethy,
I agree … that you just had an amazing revelation. I gather from many of your repetitive postings on the other forums, that the “psallo” thingy is all that you preach. Yet you now say that none of it matters. But you keep bringing it up. Yeah … right.
I do understand your frustration, however. You see, someone “concerned” told me: “… if you don’t like it, go somewhere else!” And I responded: “[You] … go somewhere else where the inanimate musical instruments could participate in admonishing you and others, as well as in letting the word of Christ dwell in you richly." (Colossians 3:16; Eph. 5:19)
Well, just continue plucking away strumming along on your cool guitar in your basement on a Tuesday evening. I don’t believe you’re sinning. David was plucking instruments among other things he was doing. Fortunately, he wasn’t in the assembly of the saints.
If you did some very serious studying on music, musical history, musical idolatry, music and paganism, musical entertainment, music in the secular world—you will amazingly find yourself in agreement with Ken Sublett. But I know you won’t as evidenced by how quickly and easily your eyes catch those familiar “phrases and expressions”—NOT taking them within the context of the message.
Do you use trumpets in your congregation? I’m just curious because trumpets have other uses such as what we find in Numbers 10:10—
Also in the day of your gladness, and in your solemn days, and in the beginnings of your months, ye shall blow with the trumpets over your burnt offerings, and over the sacrifices of your peace offerings; that they may be to you for a memorial before your God: I am the LORD your God.
BTW, instrumental music is not [yet] an issue at Madison. But we’re watching. The leader of the religious musical concert currently has a substitute for it. His elite “Praise Team” [meaning that the congregation is NEITHER the team NOR part of the team—thanks for that] uses a lot of humming, clapping, o-o-o-o-oinking, plus making unintelligible sounds that simulate musical instruments. I wonder what the difference is.
Donnie
Judge Knott (no login) 199.227.205.202
Question for Sethy
March 15 2006, 3:25 PM
Sethy, your answer may help me to understand your teaching. It seems to me that in your post you put forth an argument stated:
1) Worship is 24 hours a day for the Christian.
2) The Sunday worship assemble is part of the 24 hour day.
conclusion: The Sunday worship asembly has no more respect or reverence than any other time on any other given day.
Is that what you are teaching?
Judge Knott
Sal O. (no login) 67.127.175.52
Huh?
March 15 2006, 7:14 PM
Is this website really about Church of Christ and instrumental music?
If you believe instrumental music to be wrongand won't accept people as brothers in Christ because of it, you are very sad.
Here are the two things I get from reading over the postings, articles, and links on this website:
One, the creators and many of of the posters here have no regard or respect for the elders of their churches. None of them appear to be elders, and I bet if they were, they would not put up with members of their churches who acted and rebelled as they did.
The other is the very poor scholarship, research, and exegesis I have seen. Scary what passes for research these days. Gentlemen, I recommend researching- not this bumbling mess you have made public thus far, but REALLY researching fairly, without the slant and prejudice of your upbringing, all of these topics, particularly instruments in worship.
If you do that with a humble heart, I think you will find a very eye-opening and liberating result. Good luck in your studies!
ppb (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Huh?
March 16 2006, 1:28 AM
Sal O
I long ago went down the road you are on now and finally grew up. You heard me. I grew up and stopped searching for something to make me feel "spirit-filled" and "ecstatic". I stopped looking for what I needed and instead, looked for what God wanted. I replaced the word "I" with "He". What does he want? What does he say to do? What does he command? I found out the truth about the history of the Church and how the early Christians REALLY believed. I found out the change agents were lying and knew it. I found out that some of the colleges were aiding the false teaching.
I came to understand that what you guys are trying to peddle so hard is OLD. OLD, heretical, divisional ideas and issues that broke up the second century churches and eventually led to Catholicism and other extreme religions based on Christ. Augustine couldn't read Greek or interpret it - hence the outright heretical teachings of the Catholic church (and his need for power). Calvin had a very poor understanding of Greek (and English) grammar - hence his outrageous TULIP doctrine. But hey, your well on your way to following in their footsteps and right off the narrow path.
Nothing your trying to "sell" to Christians is new. I'm sorry if some of us are not stupid enough to fall for your sales pitch - as full of fluff and erroneous as it is. I'm sorry that I know enough Greek and history to know you are NOT speaking the truth by any means. You are the biased and self-deluded one OR you are one of those who knows exactly what you are doing and why.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Let me see, how does the new "church marketing technique" work? Oh, I remember...
ENTERTAINMENT - draws in the crowds and helps gloss over God's commands. Keeps down the time normally spent on studying more than one or two verses per sermon. This is what the people want. And we all know that we're all about man's desires...that's what brings them in.
PSYCHOLOGICAL TEACHINGS - Watch one of Joel Osteen's sermons and you'll see what really works. No scriptural teachings, but more of a self-help, feel good type lesson. You know, the old Zig Zigler stuff, but add in just a few scriptures that relate in some way so that they think they're still in church.
INSTRUMENTS - to drown out the voices of the Saints and to draw more members. Helps to bring about the "spirit-filled feelings" that feeds man's needs. Use them and they will come...
WOMEN TEACHERS, ETC - Look, today's women just don't like to hear what Paul and Timothy wrote. Just ignore it and if someone asks, play it off as the "old, legalistic" viewpoint and make up some stuff about how there were women deacons. That should put them at ease. Hopefully they won't know Greek or have read historical info to understand the difference between a deacon and a servant. Just don't read up about the deacon requirements of having one wife. That blows it every time!!! In fact, let's just have Shepherds and by-pass the word "deacon" all together! If we gain the women, along come the husbands and children. They are our "marketing goal".
SHEPHERDS - instead of Elders and Deacons - this is a gimme! Kills several birds with one stone. No longer do we have to go by the Elder and Deacon requirements. That kicks out the "can be married to only one wife" issue for the "woman leader". Plus, we don't have such narrow choices anymore. Almost anyone can be one. And who really runs the Church? The Preachers do!!! No more elders to oversee what he teaches. Power baby, Power!
PRAISE TEAMS - It's SHOW TIME! What else can I say? I just like them and the crowd seems to agree. Easy money.
BABY DEDICATIONS - Hey, becoming a Christian isn't enough of a promise that they will lead their lives and their families down the chosen path. If we make them re-dedicate, we'll have more power and they'll feel more comfortable if they are from another religion that baptized babies. Plus, it also takes up a lot of "sermon" time. Got to cut back on the God Command's items. Entertainment value is high. The crowd loves them. Real "emotional" moment and that's a big ticket draw.
SOCIALIZING WITH OTHER RELIGIONS - again, a huge crowd pleaser and pulls in new members from poorer, less entertaining churches. Makes us part of the world and not apart from the World.
IGNORING MANY SCRIPTURES - as Billy Grahman once said: "teaching the truth will lose members. I'd rather just preach about Christ and hope they realize the truth on their own." It's a HUGE ticket draw. Big Money. Big, Big Money. Telling the truth means we'll lose a lot of members. How will we pay for the large building and decorations?
"SPIRIT-FILLED FEELINGS" - if you don't get an awesome feeling of excitement, you have missed out on the whole program. It's the feelings that get's them and keeps them. I don't care how you get the feeling or what it is due to, just find a way to get it. This is another one of their desires that we need to meet.
IGNORING HISTORICAL EVIDENCES - we can't have them knowing the truth, we would lose followers. Just tell them their being lied to and that the info is false. They'll never really research it to find out theirselves. Just sell the line we taught you and you'll pull 'em in by the thousands.
STUDYING BOOKS INSTEAD OF THE BIBLE - look, too much studying of the Bible will lead to questions, which leads to truths we don't want them to know about. We'll lose members and that "good" feelings.
FOLLOWING RICK WARREN'S BOOK - The man knows how to make money and influence people. Best self-help book on the market for those that want the numbers and the money. Just don't let anyone start questioning his scriptural comments, they really show how weak he is in scriptural knowledge. It might make them start questioning our motives. Just keep to all those pro's he goes on and on about. Especially the ones about a better life, job, family, etc...That's what hooks them.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yep, that's the truth behind the change agents and the false teachings. It's a gimmick. It's happened before and will happen again. But it eventually fails, just as yours will. In fact, we've been witnessing it around our area, which had some of the first "change agent" churches. Seems many of the members are starting to see the truth and leaving for us "old", "legalistic", "boring" mainstream c of C's. We're getting new familes almost every week. It's been amazing!!!! All from the area churches that teach as you teach. And its not just our congregation, either. It's happening at several that I know of. God answers prayers!!! Praise God and his Word! Praise him from whom all blessings flow!
(no login) 4.152.81.35
Watch out for WOLVES: they howl.
March 16 2006, 2:08 PM
I have served as a deacon, elder, teacher: no elder has COMMAND AUTHORITY. Jesus outlawed that EVEN if you are an inspired apostle.
An elder rules only when he "teach that which has been taught and refutes those who contradict it." People OBEY the elders by doing what they teach trhrough the Word and by "watching the outcome of their lives.
Many elders are croony selected and usually to submit to the Alpha Billy Goat. Most are selected because they have money to contribute and most know about nothing about being a pastor. The individual decides which shepherd speaks the voice of Jesus and they know him and follow him. If an elder decides that there is nothing wrong with WORSHIP TEAMS or instruments then they are about as "Apt to chase a coon as APT to teach the Bible." I have known few elders who knew or cared much about the Bible.
People have REVERTED to the ARCHAIC because they have CRACKED AWAY just as every "tribe" when they lose faith in their "gods."
"When tribes grew too large for effective co-operation (and inbred), they often became subdivided into smaller kinship groups (clans, sibs, gentes) which continued to regard each other as close allies. Government was exercised by individual chieftains assisted by councils of elders" (p. 26).
"In this fashion evey common tribal interest--the recurrence of the seasons, the increase of the food supply, successful hunting--was likely to become embodied
in some regularly repeated ceremony, which usually included group dancing, singing, and feasting.
Besides enabling men to express, and thereby to allay, ANGER and ANXIETY, such ceremonies also promoted tribal UNITY and strengthened the loyalty of the individual to TRIBAL TRADITION,
for the emotional excitement they aroused had the effect of breaking down the barriers between individuals
and thus fusing all tribesmen into a collective whole. Meanwhile, whole systems of magical devices were gradually elaborated." (Parkes, p. 29)
This is why the word PRIEST usually meant MAGICIAN. PROPHESIER had the meaning of of the band of prophets from the High Places singing, dancing, playing instruments and singing the gibberish thereby induced.
'Certain members of a tribe, marked out either by unusual skills or by some emotional abnormality, ususally became particularly adept at these operations, and gradually assumed specialized functions. RELEASED from the duty of hunting, and concentrating on the practice of MAGIC, the shaman, SORCERER, or medicine man was the world's first professional." (Parkes, p. 29).
"The development both of religion and of the arts can be traced back in a continuous line to the hunting era. The group ritual of the primeval tribesmen were the origin not only of all religious ceremonial, but also of the drama and of poetry and music, while magic gave birth to the visual arts." (Parkes, Henry Bamford, On Gods and Men, p. 30).
"Awed by the mysteries of his own spirit no less than by those of nature, primitive man was likely to attribute to divine influence
any abnormal emotional state, whether above or below the usual level. Medicine men customarily went into states of trance in which they were believed to be in communication with the gods,
and many tribes supposed lunatics and sexual deviants to be divinely possessed.
Lee Gullism (no login) 172.151.8.125
Who flipped your switch?
March 18 2006, 7:12 PM
Goodness PPB, seems like you are really excited to teach (even though according to you, women should not do) us a lesson. Good job spreading lies and half-truths though.
I laugh every time I read on here about a "change movement" or "change agents" or "community church schemes". Where I come from, we call those "conspiracy theories" and they are only used by "insecure people".
According to you:
"I grew up and stopped searching for something to make me feel "spirit-filled" and "ecstatic"."
There's an oxymoron if I ever heard it. If you stop looking to be filled with the Holy Spirit, you have stopped growing. You can talk about all the people flocking to the old style C of C. Here's the truth. I don't believe you. I have seen the opposite with my own eyes. It is very widespread.
The other truth is: Even if you were right, they are transfers, not new converts. The old C of C quit caring about evangelism long ago. All they are worried about now is that somewhere, somehow, someone may be using a guitar and praising God at the same time! That's sad.
Sal, I agree, these people are in direct rebellion to the elders of their churches, but you will never hear them address that. As long as they feel good, and express their opinions, they are O.K. in their own eyes. They do not care about God's outline for authority and submission to leadership. (sounds like the pot calling the kettle black doesn't it?)
Ken, I'm not sure what your post meant, but I'm sure all the people who live in your imaginary world are yelling "Amen!"
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Who flipped your switch?
March 18 2006, 11:34 PM
Lee gullism,
You are exactly what Jesus and the Apostles warned us about. Thanks for at least being out in the open about it. By the way, do you ever actually read the Bible or just hold it in your hand like Joel Osteen and spout his creed... "This is my Bible. I am what it says I am...."
By the way, your idea of "religion" has come and gone over the years - about every 100 years to be more exact. It always fades out and the Church recovers and begins a regrowth. Looks like we're on the way to starting that regrowth...So I wouldn't be beating my chest with pride over your numbers. They will fade, as they always have. Future behavior is best predicted by consistant past behavior.
Just a little commons sense fact for you. Teaching false beliefs does not add saints to the church, but only keeps them away from the truth. That means you can beat your chest all day, but those numbers you are so proud of are useless in most respects. Gaining thousands of members does NOT mean you have added ANY to the church - just that your show has entertained thousands. 0 + 0 = 0.
As to your extremely biased, false, close-minded, prideful, and unChristian attitude, evangalism is more than just catering to man's desires, providing entertainment and "light" religion. It also involves teaching the TRUTH, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God. That my dear friend, you CANNOT truthfully answer with a "yes".
Don't try to fool those of us who have been there. We know what you are all about and we know how fake and shallow your "light" religion is. Our rose-colored glasses are off for good. Those who are truly seeking God and his Word will leave you eventually. This is fact.
I don't have any authority over the men on this website nor am I teaching the "christian" men on this website. It might interest you to know that they aren't learning anything from me, they already know everything I know plus MUCH, MUCH more. I am still learning from their lessons and love to learn more. Yet, I do not relish ever teaching a Bible class of men or leading the Church. I am happy in my position as supporter and servant for the Church. Do you not get that? Oh, wait - you don't want to understand that. It would burst your pride bubble.
However, I will not stop addressing false teachers who are scripturally unChristian in their beliefs and what they are spouting as "truth". All Christians, men and women, have been commanded to be on the lookout for such false teachers and to reprove and rebuke them. As long as I am doing it outside the assembly (which is my husband's place to lead/teach) and with non-Christians, how have I gone against God's commands? Priscilla taught non-Christian men outside the assembly, as did other women. They were not selected as Apostles or Disciples, but they were still important and still a part of the growth of the new Church. Why do you find that so hard to understand...Wait...that's right, its because you don't want to. Simple truth and facts just don't fit into the religion you want.
Lee Gullism (no login) 172.170.77.67
Keep it up
March 20 2006, 3:21 AM
PPB-
More lies, more denial, more evading my questions.
Do your elders know what you are saying on this site?
If so do they approve?
(no login) 68.154.165.84
Re: Keep it up
March 20 2006, 3:49 AM
Legalism,
So where did you get your innovative ideas? From the Holy Scripture? What is your church affiliation? Do you have elders? Do your elders know what you are saying on this site? If so, do they approve? (Sorry, but we need to ask you the same questions.)
Donnie
Lee Gullism (no login) 172.166.123.47
Re: Keep it up
March 21 2006, 12:59 PM
Donnie,
My questions were for PPB, not you. If you personally feel the need to have me answer these questions, I will be glad to as soon as I recieve an answer myself.
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Keep it up
March 21 2006, 4:01 PM
Lee Gullism,
It would behove you to be nice to your elders, both in spirit and age. Your comment to Donnie was unneeded and he doesn't deserve your disrespect. This is a man that can run rings around your lies and false information. He knows more about what is going on than you can imagine.
By the way, as a preacher's kid, your attempts to try and deflect the truth about the "change agent" issue is outrageously funny. Facts are facts. Truth is truth. They even call themselves "agents/christians for change". Are you really that scared to admit the truth or just self-deluded?
I answered you, several times and on several topics, unlike how you have failed to answer the scriptures I've presented. Why is that? Why do you run around in circles trying to make things personal instead of just addressing the scriptures presented? Don't you realize that we see what you are doing and its not working? Why keep wasting your time?
What church do you go to? Presbytarian? One of the Hill's? What qualifications do you have? And as Donnie asked, are your elder's aware of your rude behavior and unChristian attitude on this website?
Lee Gullism (no login) 172.134.38.63
Just Wondering
March 26 2006, 5:05 PM
PPB-
I didn't know if you saw this comment by your good budy and respected scolar Ken Sublett on the "Convincing Outline For Instrumental Music" thread in Sunday School in Exile:
Direct quote-
"You are just into hate and Paul outlawed women from the DIALOG because they will always musicate instead of educate: so says Karen Armstrong, a great scholar."
Just wondering.
(no login) 70.146.132.86
“If you’re that unhappy, go somewhere else.”
April 8 2006, 9:30 PM
Yes, I’ve heard that “suggestion” before. And I actually did something similar this past Sunday—but not because of that “advice.”
I visited the Hendersonville congregation. As some of us are aware, several years ago, the Community Church Movement intruded into the church and interfered with the affairs of its members. As a result, the intruders and their followers formed their own group now called “Community Church of Hendersonville (a body of Christ).” [This church is not to be confused with other “community” churches in Hendersonville: (a) Faith Community Church of the Nazarene; (b) Hope Center New Community Church.]
Side Note: Speaking of the Hendersonville Community Church a little bit, it has its own “shepherds” [a scriptural term—but nonetheless, it is the post-modern way to differentiate from the ole “mean-spirited” elders—the conventional but also scriptural reference to the same office]. Its website states, “The life and ministry of this church is placed in the hands of men and women who serve on the Board of Ministry Directors … ordained by the shepherds….” Doug Varnado is the “Senior Pastor”; Kevin Lawson, “Worshiping Arts Pastor” [must be their “Worship Leader”]; … Amber Hill, “Associate Youth Pastor”; etc. It has a “Community Church Choir”; a “Worship Team” [solo, quartet, etc]. Its “worship of Community is supported by some instrumentation including but not limited to Piano, Synthesizer, Acoustic Guitar, Bass Guitar, light Percussion, Violin, Flute.”
No, I wasn’t in the “Community” assembly [I was only explaining the church’s structure and organization]. I was, instead, in the Hendersonville church of Christ assembly which reported an attendance of 1,386 the previous Sunday. Um … that’s almost the size of Madison’s attendance of 1,650 – 1,750 now … after the slide from 3,000+. (I have no information re: the Hendersonville congregation prior to the “Community” split.) I believe that as it [the attendance at Madison] stands now, just like in Hendersonville, there should be plenty of room, including “my” [ ] balcony, for Madison to have one assembly, instead of two. But, of course, that’s not going to happen so long as the diversified “original” and “contemporary” separate assemblies continue. There can be no a “union” in diversification—but not unity.
The one leading singing [not to be confused with “Worship Leader”] did not behave as though he was the divinely appointed spokesman to “lead ‘the congregation’ into God’s HOLY presence.” No, he wasn’t Keith Lancaster. Yes, there were contemporary songs sung—certain songs that I would consider prospective hymns. They were sung just like the hymns that have been written to “teach and admonish” one another. No, the number of songs was not between 12 and 18 contemporary Christian rock music pieces. There was no “Praise Team” with its members with loud microphones to perform for God to see and hear. [Reminder: our God is not blind and deaf.] There was no clapping instrumentation. Although all the songs were projected on the screens with both the words and musical notes—and there’s nothing wrong with that—it was congregational singing!!! With no “Praise Team” and other entertainment interventions, the assembly was reverential and with AWE.
It is my hope that the Hendersonville congregation’s elders will not once again succumb to the dictates of culture-driven change agents. Otherwise, unnecessary division would recur.
Point: When is the group of “shepherds” at Madison going to learn from its mistakes in the past? It’s not too late.
Donnie
(no login) 195.175.37.8
No News from Madison?
April 9 2006, 11:12 PM
The latest posting of the Marcher, as of tonight, is January 18, 2006.
Has Madison decided to stop publishing the Marcher?
In Christ,
Jimmy
(no login) 68.19.206.85
“Marcher”—now a monthly publication
April 12 2006, 2:49 AM
Jimmy,
I’m looking at the latest Marcher (Vol. 55, No. 06, March 26, 2006). It has a new look—changed from “Madison MARCHER” to “MARCHER” with these lines below it: “Madison Church of Christ; Real People-Eternal Joy.” It says to the left of the Vol. number: “Published Monthly by Madison Church of Christ”; whereas on the back page, it still states: “The MADISON MARCHER (325100) is published weekly by Madison Church of Christ….”
It appears that the church’s “Human Resources Dept.” has several fully paid employees performing various man-made ministries. I have a brilliant idea—what about the human-ordained “Worship Leader” being overpaid as God’s $ERVANT to lead the MU$ICAL WOR$HIP CON$ERT at the expense of the MARCHER’s weekly mailings, etc.?
Jimmy, please just be patient. The monthly publication should be on line soon.
Meanwhile, I’m reading a section “Girls for God’s Glory Ministry.” An article titled “Twenty-Ninth Annual Ladies Renewal April 7-8, 2006” mentions Mrs. Rhonda Lowry, first lady of Lipscomb University, as the speaker. Further, it states: “We are blessed again to have Keith Lancaster and Carlene Ford to lead our worship in singing.”
Perhaps, you can help me understand the disturbing statement above. What’s Keith doing in the girls’ gathering? When Carlene “lead[s] our [the girls’] worship in singing,” does Keith seclude himself from the group of girls? Or, is it not a problem at all so long as Keith and Carlene lead the worship in singing at the same time? And “at the same time” means no one leads the other, right? Or, is Keith simply being a funny guy? Here’s the last statement: “This is a perfect time to become spiritually renewed as well as to relax and bond with your sister in the Lord [emphasis mine].”
BTW, speaking of job openings [see my reference to this above], “Job Announcement” states:
God is doing fantastic things in our Madison Family. We are seeing new faces every week, ministries are thriving, and we are growing. That growth has led us to a wonderful opportunity that your Shepherds [“Elders” is out; “Shepherds” is in] are excited to share with you.
It has been decided to add a new position to our Ministry Team, an Associate Minister of Community and Family Development. … Please see Leanne Shelby.
As a family of believers, your Shepherds ask you to agree to pray for this decision and this process, and that God will send us the man He has already chosen [emph.].”
Everything else in the old Marcher is now in the “worship guide”: Family Matters; Coming Events; This Week’s Calendar of Events; Ministry List (which includes: Boy Scouts, Media Ministry, Drama Ministry, etc.); etc.
Donnie
(no login) 199.227.205.202
bonding with sisters
April 12 2006, 2:02 PM
Donnie writes: "This is a perfect time to become spiritually renewed as well as to relax and bond with your sister in the Lord.
Jimmy comments: Keith will be there for this??? I wonder if Peck approves of it? I haven't heard from Peck in a few months. I hope he is okay.
Peck kind'a stopped posting after Piney posted about the purified swine.
A new minister has been chosen for Madison? God will send us the man He has already chosen, reads the lierature from the church there.
Which of the elders at Madison can say for sure that God has already chosen the man? It sounds as if a choice has already taken place behind closed doors!
It is interesting to read the title of this new position, Associate Minister of Community and Family Development. I would guess that he will end up teaching the "single's class." And what "community" do you suppose is meant. Could it be the church community or the neighborhood?
As for "family development," why is that a "paid job" for anyone connected to Christ?
In Christ,
Jimmy
(no login) 65.1.221.234
“Connected to Christ”
April 13 2006, 8:27 AM
Jimmy,
Why is that a “paid job” for anyone connected to Christ? An excellent question! That question is related to why the leadership is still struggling to pay the debt from the massive Vision 2000 Building Project. It’s partly about highly paid “secular” jobs in “ecclesiastical” settings.
The biggest and best question of all is this—Why is a musician with the executive position of “Worship Leader” [leading God’s people into His holy presence with “holy” entertainment] compensated for what he/she could be doing as a symphony/concert director in the secular world? After all, he/she is supposed to be or considered as God’s servant. What’s happened to serving the Lord with gladness but without pay? Isn’t this a scriptural principle—service for the Master?
Donnie
(no login) 4.152.81.13
COMMUNE and DISCIPLING Minister?
April 13 2006, 4:39 PM
The Community Church sees the "ekklesia" or school of the Bible as a COMMUNITY. According to Shelly "individuals have no right to read, interpret or speak the Word OUTSIDE of the community (READ COMMUNE) reading." Of course, this COMMUNAL reading is facilitated by SCHOLARS.
Family Development is probably another word for DISCIPLING or SHEHERDING Minister. Max has one of those and Lynn Anderson will tell you how to organize on the Promise Keepers model where you WILL reveal your financial and sexual thoughts during the week. Tulsa Workshop has always had a strong Crossroads mentality.
The thesis is that FAMILIES have too much surplus money AND time and they need to HIRE them a LEADER to make sure that they don't have any FREE money OR Time. I say it is just another effort to diminish the elders and deacons and hire a BUDDY with a "tie thicker than the blood of Jesus" to make sure that the office gossip and coffee shop is not too dull.
Huh? Maybe a WOMERN minister? ACU is training those. If she (whatever the sex) has a degree as Prophet, Chaneller or Facilitator then the AGENDA is to "take the axe to the old conservatives." Why not HARE an evangelist for missionary area which begins about 90 miles from Nashville in any direction.
My guess is that, as observed, he will NOT find too many families who need a Surrogate Husband to keep them going all week. However, once you steal ONE MORE honest preacher from the teaching task, he will never get peeled off.
Maybe he is like that DRAMA feller Keith latched on somewhere and he will go away when the families don't pay. When the BOND gets weak you can suddenly find yourself UNABLE to pay.
What IS the vast number that needs another pastor person?
David (no login) 64.207.58.133
Ruined this site
April 10 2006, 5:54 PM
Ken Sublett and Donnie Cruz and their cronies have ruined this web site for rational and civil discussions....I will no longer waste my time at this site....
(no login) 65.1.219.106
Re: Ruined this site
April 15 2006, 2:27 PM
David,
Even if you don’t visit this site anymore, thanks for being insightful that discussions on this website were previously rational and civil. There are folks who’ve never given this site at least some credit.
Donnie
Jimmy Joe (no login) 69.137.122.224
One word stood out
April 10 2006, 10:53 PM
Donnie, I would like to apologize as I had no idea I was sitting in "your" balcony for the last thirty years. I would not want to trespass on someone elses property. If there are any requirement other than to worship God to sit in "your" balcony please let us know. Also, I did miss you Sunday before last and I'm glad to know you had such a wonderful experience at Hendersonville. May our prayers be with all those that suffered last Friday in Goodlettsville, Hendersonville, Gallatin and all other parts of the country because of the deadly tornados.
Drew Pearson (no login) 69.92.236.162
Madison
April 11 2006, 4:14 PM
Jimmy Joe,
Why does Madison put up with Donnie? If he wants things to be back to the way it was, why doesn't someone (Elders/Anyone) tell him to go where his spirit of despare can once again find peace? I would read the writing on the wall and go somewhere else like Hendersonville instead of continuing to be upset and angry.
Can anyone tell me where I can buy some "Aromatherapy Oils Candles?"
Jimmy Joe (no login) 69.137.122.224
Thanks
April 11 2006, 11:43 PM
Drew, Thanks for your post.I really know of no reason for Donnie to be asked or required to not attend Madison. In my entire life I've only seen people escorted out of a Church of Christ once. Their crime was that they were black. Of course this was in the early 60's when all most all churches in Nashville were segregated. Evidently the religious leaders of that time could see nothing wrong with their belief.
Between 1964 and the present day apparently some people saw a reason to change. Today I see Madison Church of Christ as a wonderfully diversifed loving congregation. All are welcome.
As for me, no one has ever made me attend Madison or asked me to leave. And as long as this remains a free country we all can stay or go as we please. However, I personally would not continue to participate in something I believed was wrong and full of error. That's just me.
(no login) 170.190.198.108
Re: Madison
April 12 2006, 1:21 PM
You asked why the elders (or anyone else) do nothing about Donnie and his continued efforts to criticize the worship at Madison. That’s an excellent question. As an active member at Madison I’ve wondered that for several years now, too. The only reason I can determine is that they are men of peace who would rather allow Donnie to have his rant and hopefully allow the truth to be seen by anyone who really wants to see it. A very wise man (Ira North) had a saying, “You can’t win a puking contest with a buzzard!” I figure this is the approach our elders are taking with Donnie.
This site is called “Concerned Members.” From all indications, Donnie is not on the role at Madison as a member. The elders cannot put him out of our assembly because he is not a member (although he may have been visiting for many years). If you look at any edition of the Madison directory you will not find Donnie’s photo, nor will you find his phone number or address listed in the back. He is in none of the group photographs (ministry teams, service committees, volunteer groups, etc.). I’ve been worshipping at Madison since 1968 and I have never seen Donnie lead a prayer, teach a class, or take any public role in carrying out God’s work in our church family. I’ve never heard anyone claim Donnie’s influence on their decision to be a part of the Madison family. A couple of years ago I asked Donnie in this site to visit the 3rd and 4th grade department as we are always looking for more workers, but he chose to ignore that invitation. It is obvious to anyone who looks at this site objectively that Donnie’s sole mission is to sow discord at Madison. God will deal with that Himself (Proverbs 6:16-19).
The truth is out there, if anyone is interested. Come to our worship services and witness it for yourself. The difference between what is real and what you find to be gross exaggeration just might surprise you.
Richard Maxwell (no login) 70.185.158.221
Re: Madison
April 14 2006, 11:26 PM
I came onto this website doing some searches of the church of Christ and am completely blown away at some of the post's from PPB ? and gang. This person apparently has never "gotten out of town." The poster says that they never heard of Jewel Miller yet this is an icon in the church of Christ. PPB ? must have just joined the c of C to have never heard of Jewel Miller. The ridiculous responses sound typical of a "sound" church of Christ member, but how sad the simple mind that this person displays.
This here is a classic example of the ignorance of this young teacher in their church in Houston.
No one ever has said that Jesus is not in charge, however one can clearly see that there truly was a Council that represented the direction of the church...PPB please read Acts 15 "for the first time".
Concerned Christian said, (I can understand this person's sense of humor, but they have a point;)
"Having a Headquarters; When we have a question or debate we should pack up and go to Jerusalem and meet with the council of leaders."
PPB ? said, "Christ is our headquarter. The Bible is our guide and with it we need nothing else. What is your point here? Nowhere in the NT does it teach about meeting at a council of leaders for all the churches. Each church had their own elders..." PPB ?" Stop meddling in what other churches are doing regardless of what denomination YOU said that the elders do the leading so stop being so nosy.
While I do not disagree that Jesus is the leader you truly showed your ignorance of what was going on in the early church.
Excuses and bad teaching is all that one see in this posters comments. Anger is another good explanation of PPB ? who constantly throws flaming darts at people it is hilarious. PPB ? your exegetical study is elementary at best and I wish you the best as your move into the 2nd grade. Good luck in VBS this Summer.
Donnie is another person who is completely out of control and needs to find a new church home. Leave!
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: Madison
April 15 2006, 2:17 PM
Richard,
Thank you for showing your true colors with your very first posting!
As for Jewel Miller, what a laugh! You obviously failed to read other postings or you would know I am a preacher's kid. Yep, a c of C preachers kid who has actually attended many, many different congregations across a large geographical area. Yeah...so...Strike 1 against Richard.
By the way, I can't wait to show your posting to some of my church scholar friends (and no, they are not all members of the c of C). They will get a hoot out of it!!! Are you aware of the different definitions for "council"? Are you aware that any meeting between two or more Christians to discuss an issue is by definition a "council"?
The discussion was in regards to a "Formal Council" that determines how all congregations will believe and teach. Like the Missouri Synod for the Lutherans, etc. As such, could you please explain how a meeting between Jesus, the Apostles and some of the Christian Jewish factions (Acts 15) is considered a formal "Council"? Did you see something in there that every scholar has missed? Are you so more intelligent than notable scholars? How does a meeting equal a formal council? Seems YOU jumped to conclusions without fully reading the posting. Oops!
The Bible is full of meetings and letters of discussions over specific issues. However, there was no FORMAL COUNCIL. Are you Episcopalian or Catholic? Is that why you believe a formal council was in force in the early church? If so, you might want to go back a little further into the church's history as the Catholic church is NOT the early church.
If you had knowledge of the early christian church history before 250 AD, you would note that the church elders were the head of each church and were not part of a formal council. There was no official government that oversaw all the churches. Each one was autonomous (do I need to get that definition for you?) That's right. You read me right. NO FORMAL COUNCIL. Did they meet to discuss issues in the church when warranted? Sure, as we still do today. That has never been in doubt. However, such meetings were only held when needed and by the churches that were having the problems. Again, let me state that there was NO FORMAL COUNCIL OVER THE EARLY CHURCHES. I can't believe I even had to discuss this issue as it is such a well known point about the early church. Goodness. Strike 2 against Richard.
Richard states: "Stop meddling in what other churches are doing regardless of what denomination YOU said that the elders do the leading so stop being so nosy." Again, Richard shows his lack of scriptural knowledge regarding rebuking and admonishing false teachers. Richard, do I need to list all those verses again about standing firm in the teachings of Jesus and rebuking/admonshing those who do not? Are you even aware of those scriptures? Tsk, tsk. Such hatefullness. Strike 3 against Richard.
Anger is written all over your posting. Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? Or a log in the eye? You have no idea of my educational background, but thanks for assuming. However, you might want to go back and read your hilarious posting - it was somewhat difficult as your grammar was slightly off and well...2nd grade usually teaches you basic sentence structures. So I guess I'll see you there!
By the way, thanks for thinking I was young. What a hoot. Truly, your posting made my day. I haven't laughed that hard in a long time. Thanks!
Richard Maxwell (no login) 70.185.158.221
Re: Madison
April 16 2006, 12:29 AM
PPB,
I was not aware we were playing baseball but your exegetical "pitching" is/was horrible...You said strike out and the umpire called a ball Low and Away he called another ball which was high and outside and the third pitch you threw was in the dirt...anyway.
I am sorry I even came onto this hateful site. Your knowledge and lack of depth of information is typical of diehard church of Christ defenders. I am sorry I assumed you were a new convert, but typically "older" members sound just as ignorant as you do so to know someones age when discussing with people like you could be anywhere from 10-90 + years old and just as ignorant as the day they dried off from the baptistry.
[... … … ]
++++++++++++++++++++
For the rest of Richard’s post that is so full of love and truth, please see “The Viper’s Den” with this title—“Another Church Disloyalty” (April 16 2006, 6:16 PM) at this address:
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 67.32.215.174 on Apr 16, 2006 7:36 PM
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.161.167
RE: Madison (Richard Maxwell)
April 16 2006, 9:12 PM
If PPB can be "faulted" for anything, it's that she often responds in very strong language that conveys a sense of authority, for she is most learned in biblical teachings and Church history, being a "preacher's kid" as she describes herself. I've yet to find anything erroneous that she has presented in the way of biblical argument or Church history. I've also noted that a number of detractors have reacted most viciously to PPB, perhaps because they are male and she is female, which may pose a threat to their ego. Many "macho" men cannot abide a strong-willed, determined woman, especially one with profound biblical knowledge as PPB. Because PPB will strongly challenge unscriptural beliefs, most detractors cannot stand up and hold a civil biblical discussion with her, as Richard demonstrates. He accuses her of being hateful, yet upon reading his response here and in the Vipers Den, it is Richard who manifests profound hatred toward PPB. And to weaken his "argument," instead of providing strong, scriptural rebuttal to discredit PPB, Richard only hurls the usual insults and character assassinations so typical of those embracing the Change Movement. No wonder so many detractors have left this site and fled as refugees to places like Faithsite.com and Ex-ChurchofChrist.com. With minimal moderation at those sites, their posts appear instantly, and they are "free" to bash and trash this site and the Church of Christ at will.
As John Waddey mentioned in his "Lessons to Fortify Us" thread, we may be strong in our dealings with those who oppose us, but we must do so in a Christ-like manner. And even Christ was not only harsh at times with the Pharisees and others who opposed Him, He also sternly rebuked His apostles as needed. But He did so in love, not with bitter hatred. Manifesting vicious hatred and gathering with friends to "laugh over" this site and the Church of Christ (see the Vipers Den) is hardly the attitude that Christ would expect from those who profess to follow Him.
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: RE: Madison (Richard Maxwell)
April 16 2006, 10:16 PM
Thanks Dr. Crump. As always, you are so very eloquent in your writings. Seems any comment I make is taken as rude or angry but the poster doesn't ever look at his/her own posting. I hope I haven't embarassed you guys. I do try very hard to keep my comments to those who show clearly from their postings that they are NOT following the scriptures so that i am not commenting to a brother in Christ. Though I am sure I may have accidently done so. That is why I have only responded lately to those who are so far off and are c of C bashers.
Though I was feeling in good spirits when I wrote my response to Richard M., I noticed that when I read it later it didn't come across that way if you didn't know my true mindset at that time. So I apologize to anyone that took it as rude or condescending. Though I do admit that Richard's lack of knowledge is overwhelming and his "authority" without any merit - I still have to watch my "tone" as it can be taken several ways depending on how the reader is feeling. Seems all Richard is is opinion and feelings but not fact or scriptures. I guess I'm still so disappointed by people that should know better but don't for some reason. Seems our dear Richard M. has some outdated ideas about Catholicism, too.
As for people getting angry at my postings - I have yet to have someone disprove my historical evidence WITh historical evidence. Though I do expect to learn something new from someone as I am only a babe in many ways. I will continue to pray for those lost members like Richard M.
Funny thing, our preacher discussed this very issue today - false teachings and standing firm in the faith is as important as spreading the joy of Christ and his Word. They go hand in hand because true love is caring about others' souls - to the point of standing against false teachers that may lure others away - garnering hate in the process.
(no login) 70.149.152.174
Re: Madison
April 15 2006, 3:12 PM
John;
It seems that over half your former membership has left the Madison Church.
If things are so well, what happened?
Donnie doesn't speak for himself, he speaks for me and thousands of others that were tricked by the embracing of the "church growth movement" by those with itching ears.
As I look around, I don't see very much high ground for you to stand on.
A church in middle Tennessee recently was having trouble with a small group of people that had itching ears, very much like what happened at Madison.
I had the privilege of addressing those brothers prior to an important decision. I simply told them the outline of what happened at Madison.
They wisely decided to stop the changes immediately, and they are now a stronger body, less a few wolves of course.
I, like Donnie, and others on this site make no apology for standing up for the truth.
Thousands of socialist KGB agents infiltrated the Catholic and protestant churches starting back in the late 1930's. They had a specific list of things they tried to accomplish to drive the church of Christ into apostasy.
Madison has now embraced everything on that list.
If you were a seeker of the truth, you would be busy finding out what you have missed instead of personally attacking the messenger.
David Rhoades
(no login) 4.152.159.129
Ignorance is wunnerful.
April 15 2006, 5:47 PM
I believe that is JULE Miller. Seems to me that this early system pretty much did what Peter did BEFORE he was ready to announce that Jesus was the Messiah.
Lots of people appeal to the Jerusalem Conference but not up to prime time enough to read the Bible. I believe that James settled the issue by SCRIPTURE both prophesied and already taught. They BOUND only those things demanded by common morality. It must be HORRIFYING horrible to hear the Bible as it has been taught when you are BUILT upon the foundation of preacher's sound bytes.
Simeon hath declared how God at the first
did visit the Gentiles,to take out of them a people for his name. Acts 15:14
And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written, Acts 15:15
After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David,
which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up: Acts 15:16
That the residue of men might seek after the Lord,
and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called,
saith the Lord, who doeth all these things. Acts 15:17
The CENI principle is well articulated in the Bible and all church history and by all founders of denominations--until this latter day of Apostates and Profits with their new PhDuhs still dripping blood from a fleeced lamb. You don't NEED to know much Bible these days if you can fling your tender effeminate hands high enough.
James establishes the ABSOLUTE DEMAND articulated by Peter to MARK as false teachers those who do not rely on the ONCE validated by eye and ear witnesses Word of God.
As far as PUKING is concerned, I find that the word for HAND CLAPPING also means VOMITING.
Lee Gullism (no login) 172.163.92.208
More of the same
April 18 2006, 12:50 AM
Haven't been around these parts in a while. Thought I'd swing by to see if any of the "Pious Five" have found the love of Christ yet. Unfortunately, my prediction was correct. They haven't.
PPB is still usurping male authority and making illegitimate excuses for it.
Crump is still attempting to cover for her.
You are wrong about the Jerusalem council by the way.
"Are you aware that any meeting between two or more Christians to discuss an issue is by definition a "council"?"
That's actually NOT the definition of a council.
"As such, could you please explain how a meeting between Jesus, the Apostles and some of the Christian Jewish factions (Acts 15) is considered a formal "Council"?"
I'm not sure what version of the Bible you read that says anything about Jesus being at the meeting in Acts 15. Mine says he'd already ascended.
"Did you see something in there that every scholar has missed? Are you so more intelligent than notable scholars?"
I'm curious who you consider a notable scholar? John Waddey? If so, that says a lot about your sources.
"How does a meeting equal a formal council?"
It doesn't. But Acts 15 is a formal council. To say otherwise is your opinion, which you have the right to spew, it just happens to be wrong in this case.
Seems YOU jumped to conclusions AFTER fully reading the posting. Oops!
PPB (no login) 70.116.84.97
Re: More of the same
April 21 2006, 3:40 AM
Lee,
You seem to assume a lot for someone who is supposed to be a Christian.
By the way, the verse you are refering to in Acts 15 discusses their "coming together". The Greek word is Sunago which means to literally meet, assemble or draw together. It does NOT mean a formal council that dictated beliefs for all the churches. It was a meeting, a debate. They argued, they agreed, they warned of false teachers going through their area, and they discussed the early scriptural letters, just like our Elders and preachers do today when warranted.
Acts 20:7 uses the same Greek word for "came together" for a regular Sunday asembly. Are you now saying that Sunday assemblies are formal councils? That is the only reasonable inference one can make from your comment. The NT also uses that word for their regular meals together. Where did you get information that there was some formal government that ran the churches? No such church government/council appeared until well after the church had been established and man started adding their own positions to the church.
Act 20:7 And upon the first [day] of the week, when the disciples came together (sunago) to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight.
I'm sorry, but can you find a verse in the NT that describes the position of a Human overseer for ALL of the churches? A Pope? A Cardinal? A Bishop over all the churches? Nope. Because those positions were not intended by God to be a part of his Church. It is his Church and he appointed Christ as the head of the Church as a whole - no ONE else. Christ has already made his decree as to what he wants us to do and not do. In fact, the only scholars (and I use the word lightly here) that refer back to Acts 15 as their reasoning for councils are the Catholics and their break-off religions. Now why is that? These are the same people that believe Peter is the foundation of the church (due to very poor understanding of Greek grammar) and that Mary can intercede for us with God (complete dismissal of scriptures). Wow...let's believe their reasoning skills. Not.
The Greek word used in the Bible to denote a true council is "sumboulion". This word is used in conjunction with the Jewish councils and other councils but NOT in relation to the Church. In fact, Mat 5:22 Jesus clearly separates the punishment by the Jewish Council for name calling (Raca) from that of the Christians who are in danger of hell for the same type of comment (fool). You will note that sumboulion is not used in reference to that meeting in Acts 15.
As for the term "council" - the meaning I gave is one of the many definitions. Council is defined as anything from an informal meeting of two or more people to a formal council run by some type of governmental system.
Oh, you are right on one thing, I did state Jesus when I meant Paul. Though it was VERY late that night, it is not an excuse for not having proofread my writing. Though I think you already knew that was a simple mistake, didn't you...
(no login) 4.153.66.191
council?
April 21 2006, 12:38 PM
It it a fact as the lady--who can teach me--said: they SYNGAGOUED. The ekklesia is roughly equivalent to the SYNAGOGUE which is not remotely similar to the PAGAN WORSHIP CENTERS of today.
I won't bother to look it up but when you have a DOCTRINAL question you go to CHURCH as ask someone who is LITERATE. James was one of the few who knew what the new SCRIPTURAL requirements were and he appealed to the WORD OF CHRIST about the Gentiles. No votes taken.
Next, the judgment was that the "customs" against BLOOD and FORNICATION should be enforced among ALL new believers.
Now, you don't get to DECIDE about THAT WHICH AS BEEN TAUGHT and delivered ONCE FOR ALL.
You DO get to tell everyone NOT to violate laws or taboos which offends others. You DON'T get to buy your meet from the SACRIFICIAL MARKETS IF that causes others to stumble.
You DON'T get to hold a SYNAGOGUE and decide whether fornication is ACCEPTABLE or not.
Now, isn't that simple, simple?
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Mr. Worsham's take on Donnie Cruz
April 19 2006, 4:15 PM
I would love to hear Donnie's answer to Mr. Worsham's post!!!
Boris (no login) 68.159.154.245
Re: Madison
April 25 2006, 8:28 PM
Very interesting stuff about the "KGB" agents. I have never heard of this before. Mr. Rhoades, where may I find more information on this subject?
Thanks
====================================
Bless you Boris!
This message has been edited by ConcernedMembers from IP address 65.1.123.208 on Apr 25, 2006 8:39 PM
(no login) 65.1.218.250
“I would love to hear Donnie’s answer to…”
April 22 2006, 7:28 PM
Jimmy Joe (April 10, 2006) stated—“Donnie, I would like to apologize as I had no idea I was sitting in "your" balcony for the last thirty years. I would not want to trespass on someone elses property. If there are any requirement other than to worship God to sit in "your" balcony please let us know. Also, I did miss you Sunday before last and I'm glad to know you had such a wonderful experience at Hendersonville. …”
Jimmy Joe, your comment regarding “the last thirty years” beats my last 18 years or so. It is proof that “my” ownership of the balcony has not been as long as I had miscalculated. A few of my post respondents have declared that ownership for me, since they know that I have ignored their invitation for me to sit downstairs and try to watch Keith’s praise musicians perform—clap, hum, whistle, sway to the music, sing a solo, use the microphone, etc.—only to disprove me saying that Keith’s musicians (the “Praise Team”—a.k.a. the “choir”) have taken over or overridden congregational singing. Keith knows that congregational singing at Madison seems bound to extinction as do the hymns that teach and admonish BECAUSE his musicians and their microphones and the lyrics projected on the screens without the musical notes—all have taken over.
Why do you think he’s made attempts to conduct classes on occasion for folks to learn to read music? He is as wise as a serpent—deceptive; otherwise, he would return to using the hymnbooks and eradicate the “Praise Team Dependency Syndrome” (P.T.D.S.) “Musicating” in that way is a spiritual malignancy!!! On the contrary, it was refreshing at Hendersonville to see the musical notes displayed on the screens with the words to the hymn—there was no Praise Team to substitute or mediate or intercede for anyone.
LOL … I thought “my” balcony would get anyone’s attention. I have a good sense of humor, too, you know.
In response to your subsequent post (April 11), I shouldn’t have to explain that my comments in many instances have been/are being directed to the leadership—not to the members—especially in times when it is misguided. Thanks for posting.
Drew Pearson said (April 11, 2006): “Why does Madison put up with Donnie? If he wants things to be back to the way it was, why doesn't someone (Elders/Anyone) tell him to go where his spirit of despare can once again find peace? I would read the writing on the wall and go somewhere else like Hendersonville instead of continuing to be upset and angry. … Can anyone tell me where I can buy some ‘Aromatherapy Oils Candles?’”
Drew, I need to update you on something—the term in reference to the mean olden “elders” is out; the reference to the kind “shepherds” is in. I have been approached by a few “kind” shepherds at a time twice, however you take that to mean. But in the end, that’s really a decision that I would have to make, not someone else. BTW, did you mean finding a “peaceful” church? Also, I’m trying my best while I seem to “be angry” … to “sin not.”
[To be continued….]
(no login) 65.1.218.250
“I would love to hear Donnie’s answer to…”
April 24 2006, 4:36 AM
John Worsham (April 12 2006, 1:21 PM): “You asked why the elders (or anyone else) do nothing about Donnie and his continued efforts to criticize the worship at Madison. Donnie … his rant … is not on the role at Madison as a member … he is not a member … you will not find Donnie’s photo … phone number or address … is in none of the group photographs (ministry teams, service committees, volunteer groups, etc.) … I have never seen Donnie lead a prayer, teach a class, or take any public role … I’ve never heard anyone claim Donnie’s influence …. It is obvious to anyone who looks at this site objectively that Donnie’s sole mission is to sow discord at Madison. God will deal with that Himself (Proverbs 6:16-19).
The truth is out there, if anyone is interested. Come to our worship services and witness it for yourself. The difference between what is real and what you find to be gross exaggeration just might surprise you.
”
John, I could not have responded any better than David Rhoades did, and there’s really nothing else for me to add to change your mind. My messages have been directed to the leadership and certain misguided leaders—not to the members, not to the congregation. I agree with David that instead of personally attacking me, you should be busy finding out for yourself the facts concerning the real discord sown that you accuse me of.
Just a little reminder—the congregation has not recovered yet from the upheaval of 2001. And speaking of “sowing discord,” that was it when it happened. Did David mention that “it seems that over half your membership has left the Madison Church”? It’s true that we see a lot of new faces—say … 350 plus?
3,100 in attendance prior to the upheaval;
1,750 is currently the average attendance; but
350 of 1,750 are new attendees.
====================
If math is your thing, how many attendees have left?
While you’re doing your research, see if Keith Lancaster and his elite musicians—a.k.a. “The Praise Team” with their microphones—were not responsible for the major damage. Where were you when the leadership announced, “Get over it; we must move on”?
I have a couple of suggestions: (1) The Praise Team members should stop hiding, occupying the first two front rows, but be on the stage facing the congregation for everyone to see them with their handheld microphones, soloing, humming, rhythmically clapping, making unintelligible sounds that simulate instruments, etc.; or (2) return to congregational singing of hymns that teach and admonish one another.
Is the leadership afraid to attempt option #2? It has not been tried since the upheaval. Who knows the alienated brethren just might return?
Donnie
B (no login) 70.232.56.42
Re: “I would love to hear Donnie’s answer to…”
April 24 2006, 4:20 PM
Donnie,
First, usually the term "musicians" refers to those who play instruments. Madison's praise team doesn't, so "singers" might be a better choice. You could use "vocalists" if you want to continue painting a negative picture via terminology. Or, you could go with the Sublett classic, "minstrels".
Second, the praise team is probably on the front row rather than the stage as a compromise. They probably feel that it's less upsetting than having them on stage. If you talk to the elders about it, you might be able to get them moved up there.
(no login) 195.175.37.8
Harmony???
April 24 2006, 10:55 PM
"...the Praise & Harmony seminars are going well" reports the song leader, KL, on one of his blog dated March 18, 2006. (a side note: I am sorry to learn of the trailer with all of the equipment being stolen.)
One quick observation. The song leader is concerned about "vocal harmony." He is having "seminars!"
Would it not be great if the elders would have harmony seminars also? They could help teach brethren to live in harmony. They could bring harmony back to the 2 disharmonized worship services.
Vocal harmony may produce good sounds but church harmony can produce a unified congregation.
I wonder why vocal harmony is promoted but not congregational harmony?
(1) The picture “painting” is intentional on my part, and I don’t apologize for it. I do agree with you on all the terms—I also like “minstrels.”
What about “choir boys … and girls, too”?
What about “praise performers” or “praise entertainers”?
What about the “Lord’s singers”?
What about “The Idolatry of Musical Talent Group”?
Technically, while singing is supposed to be “vocal” only (unless diluted with rhythmic clapping which is non-vocal), “music” by definition can be either: (1) vocal only or (2) instrumental only or (3) vocal with instrumentation. On that basis, “musicians” is a good description of Keith’s elite group of singers and rhythmic clappers. Please keep in mind that rhythmic clapping (as is done in cheerleading in sport events, etc.) is never vocal. [Do I need to explain that handclapping does not emanate from the vocal cords? The hands do not have vocal cords—to put it simply for those who don’t quite grasp the concept or imagery.] Therefore, I am correct in my description of Keith’s “musicians.”
What about this: refer to Keith’s musicians as “singers” and “vocalists” only when rhythmic clapping is reserved for the cheerleaders in sports. But when clapping [non-vocal] is performed, they become musicians.
Besides all the points mentioned above, rhythmic clappers will still argue that clapping is an “expression of joy.” They must be joking … right? If not, I must say that “rhythmic clapping” and “rhythmic joy” are synonymous.
(2) I was being facetious about Keith’s praise performers being on stage. That will be the day of presenting a true picture of performances as prescribed by the “Holy Entertainment” and the “Holy Laughter Movement.” I agree with you—that will be very upsetting.
Donnie
Bill Riggins (no login) 207.200.116.5
Madison
May 15 2006, 10:56 PM
Donnie,
Please update us with Madison gossip. The lack of slander to the church there makes me think they dismissed services for a couple of weeks (How dare they forsake the assembly or have they jumped in a time machine and slipped back into the 50's)??? Please Update all of us on the SIN going on at Madison!
Bill
(no login) 68.19.204.96
Recyclable
May 16 2006, 7:21 AM
Bill,
Your concern about “the assembly”—either forsaking it or slipping back into “the 50’s” [which is undoubtedly the change agents’ terminology]—is greatly appreciated.
What about changing the topic somewhat from “the SIN going on at Madison”—which this website has never mentioned—to the hyperactivity of the “Musical Worship Leader” and his “Praise Team” as they all PERFORM?
Thanks for your post very much [I say that with sincerity]—it has just updated “us with Madison gossip.” I also would like to remind our readers that our posted materials are recyclable—isn’t this the 10th set of posts and the 11th is at hand?
Donnie
Jimmy Joe (no login) 68.52.127.150
Please update
May 16 2006, 10:51 PM
Donnie could you please update the title topic of these post. Let's be more honest here. The title of the 11th set should be: What Happened at Madison This Week As I See It - by Donnie Cruz. Considering you arrive late and leave early their could be something happening that you miss and did not critique.
Jimmy Joe (no login) 68.52.127.150
Sorry
May 17 2006, 4:42 PM
Sorry for grammatical error in last post. Shoud be there not their.
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: Please update
May 18 2006, 7:31 PM
You don't think Donnie would strech the truth just a wee bit to suit his needs, and make the gossip about Madison sound better than it is?
(no login) 65.1.199.224
St-r-r-r-r-r-etching the truth
May 20 2006, 6:49 PM
So, how else is the truth about “rhythmic clapping” to be presented? Or, solo performances? Or, your “Worship Leader” giving the impression to the public that he has been anointed by God to lead the congregants into His HOLY presence? Have you seen him “looking up above” in “prayer” to seek God’s acknowledgment of his [paid ] musical worship leadership—“God, we glorify and honor Your Most Holy Name with us ‘[making] a joyful noise unto the Lord.’” Stop it, Keith, God knows everyone’s heart, including yours.
Here’s your “Worship Leader’s” idea of: “Make a joyful noise unto the Lord.” His scriptural reference is in Psalm 98 (and other passages)—
“[4] Make a joyful noise unto the LORD, all the earth: make a loud noise, and rejoice, and sing praise.
[5] Sing unto the LORD with the harp; with the harp, and the voice of a psalm.
[6] With trumpets and sound of cornet make a joyful noise before the LORD, the King.”
He must believe that the real [Praise Team-less] “congregational singing” is not good enough for God to know everyone’s heart. He thinks that God “listens” to man’s nerve-pulsating, emotion-driven, body-gyrating music in the same manner that man listens to the post-modern upbeat “Christian Rock” music of our present culture.
Ah-ha! He owns “The Acappella” [religious] business. Do you still wonder why he does not involve the instruments mentioned in the passage in participating in the “musical praise service,” namely: the harp, trumpets, and cornet? Better yet, the list in Psalm 150—
[1] Praise ye the LORD. Praise God in his sanctuary: praise him in the firmament of his power.
[2] Praise him for his mighty acts: praise him according to his excellent greatness.
[3] Praise him with the sound of the trumpet: praise him with the psaltery and harp.
[4] Praise him with the timbrel and dance: praise him with stringed instruments and organs.
[5] Praise him upon the loud cymbals: praise him upon the high sounding cymbals.
[6] Let every thing that hath breath praise the LORD. Praise ye the LORD.
How many instruments are listed in the passage—trumpet, psaltery and harp, timbrel and dance, string instruments and organs, loud [high sounding] cymbals, everything that hath breath [which living creatures these are]?
Well, I realize these are forbidden in our NT assembly, as well as in Keith’s own organization. So, what does he substitute for these instead? Uh-oh! Loud rhythmic clapping, the o-o-o-o-o-o sound, unintelligible sounds that simulate either instruments or Minnie Pearl’s high-pitched “Howdee!” and solo performances and applause at the end of an “enthusiastically” sung praise music. Don’t forget, of course, the louder sound effects from his Praise Team’s microphones.
Oops! Sorry, Anonym, you got me started on st-r-r-r-r-r-etching the truth a wee bit to make the gossip less boring.
Here’s anybody’s chance to explain the simple truth without stretching it. How would someone (other than myself) explain, for example, clapping—is it not rhythmic; is it not loud; is it to be considered emanating from the vocal chords; isn’t it programmed joy since it isn’t spontaneous?
Donnie
(no login) 65.1.199.224
Let’s not be exclusive….
May 20 2006, 6:55 PM
Jimmy Joe,
Your observation regarding my arriving late and leaving early appears to prove my point—I have no interest in your “Worship Leader” leading or bringing me into God’s holy presence—his way. I am personally offended whenever there is [especially when excessive] rah-rah-rah while addressing our heavenly Father’s holy name or “bowing before Thee in reverence and awe.”
I honestly realize that are times when your “Worship Leader” sings hymns reverently (and I have nothing there to complain about), but during the “musical ‘praise’ and worship” period of the assembly, how am I supposed to know beforehand when singing in reverence is on the program?
Yes, I leave early [as if the last couple of minutes really mattered ] when I see that the “dismissal praise music” is what I know that it is. “I belong to Jesus … I belong to Jesus … I belong to Jesus [clap-clap, clap-clap-clap]” verbal testimony sounds hypocritical to me.
I almost forgot this—I believe that the thread, “What Happened This Week at Madison” is already authored by Concerned Members. I can’t change that. For one thing, it’s not right to exclude others from authoring their own posts.
Based on my honest feelings expressed above, do you still see the need for me to critique what I might be missing by arriving late and leaving early?
Donnie
(no login) 70.149.147.217
“You Set My Feet to Dancing” While “On Bended Knee I Come”
May 22 2006, 6:47 AM
In the program on Sunday (5/21/06), feeling-good-about-self DANCE or lifting-hands music was delivered—feeling good about SELF is almost the typical occurrence in every assembly. No, not this time, within view I did not witness someone perform the literal 360-degree turn-around dance with the music. That’s understandable—the matching lyric, “You have turned my mourning into dancing” would have to be the right kind of music.
Notice the following musical pieces:
The River Is Here: … Along the banks of the river we run we dance with laughter giving praise to the Son … The river of God sets our feet to dancing … the river of God fills our hearts with cheer … the river of God fills our mouths with laughter and we rejoice for the river is here.
I Love To Be In Your Presence: I love to be in Your presence with Your people singing praises; I love to stand and rejoice, lift my hands and raise my voice. You set my feet to dancing. You fill my heart with song. You gave me reason to rejoice. I lift my hands, lift my hands, lift my hands and raise my voice.
On Bended Knee: On bended knee I come, with a humble heart I come, bowing down before Your holy throne. Lifting holy hands to You, as I pledge my love a new. I worship You in spirit … Change my life, O Holy Spirit, make me fresh and ever new, make my life a holy sacrifice to You.
It’s more than just the tempo or the beat. The “Worship Leader” exemplifies the IMITATED “Charismatic” behavior and expression of emotions in various forms. Oh, well, there was “very mild” dancing—only swaying to the music and lifting of hands. But don’t forget about the usual rhythmic clapping accompaniment.
Lest I forget these performances prior to the Lord’s Supper—“How Deep the Father’s Love….” The soloist [female soprano vocalist] performed the first verse; the second verse was a duet [female soprano and female alto]; the rest of the Praise Team joined in the singing of the last verse. Well, either the soloist has strong lungs or her microphone was wee bit loud—regardless, a distraction!
The “dismissal” silly-singy-clappy “praise” music—“Take the Lord with you … in the street, in the home, on the job [clap-clap-clap].” O, Keith, enough of your charismatic behavior during your musical worship concert.
Just what’s happening to congregational singing? The only real test if it still exists is to let the congregation sing to the best of its ability without the cover-up, assistance and overpowering and domination of Keith’s “Praise Team.” Is it really about “ME” feeling good or is it about “teaching and admonishing one another … and letting the words of Christ dwell in us richly”?
Donnie
(no login) 70.156.21.180
“Madison Timeline # 10”
May 24 2006, 7:51 PM
I gather that “Concerned Christian” would like this e-mail posted in response to the above:
-----Original Message----- From: Concerned Christian [concernedchristian__@_________.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 6:18 PM To: Donnie Cruz Subject: Madison Timeline # 10
Untruth Buster,
Go somewhere else if you hate it so much "and can't leave it well enough alone." If you feel so uncomfortable why do you "persecute" your soul like this.
Untruth Buster
(no login) 65.1.219.114
“Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 27 2006, 12:02 PM
-----Original Message----- From: Concerned Christian [concernedchristian__@_________.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 6:26 PM To: Donnie Cruz Subject: Re: Madison Timeline # 10
You said in your Post/Crap...(The “dismissal” silly-singy-clappy “praise” music—“Take the Lord with you … in the street, in the home, on the job [clap-clap-clap].” O, Keith, enough of your charismatic behavior during your musical worship concert.)
Since this is SOOOOOOO [image of the devil with horns] wrong (in your oppinion) have you gone to him and talked to him, or are you cowardly writing about a Christian Brother and bad mouthing him to others. Some Christian you are.
What a joke!
-----Original Message----- From: Concerned Christian [concernedchristian__@_________.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:20 PM To: Concerned Christian; Donnie Cruz Subject: Re: Madison Timeline # 10
Great cut and paste method in CM. If I wanted to post on your stupid site I could. [some _____ image] So why don't you leave "your" balcony? How can you get anything out of church if this is so miserable for you?
-----Original Message----- From: Concerned Christian [concernedchristian__@_________.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:06 AM To: Concerned Christian; Donnie Cruz Subject: Re: Madison Timeline # 10
Well?????????????????
Since this is SOOOOOOO [image of the devil with horns] wrong (in your oppinion) have you gone to him (Keith) and talked to him, or are you cowardly writing about a Christian Brother and bad mouthing him to others. Some Christian you are.
What a joke!
(no login) 65.1.219.114
“… cowardly writing about a Christian Brother and bad mouthing him…”
May 27 2006, 3:19 PM
“Bad mouthing him to others,” you say? What about him and his own ardent supporters “cowardly” not responding to the “cowardly” writings?
The “Christian Brother” you speak of knows about the ConcernedMembers website, and the current leadership knows about it as well. And why are you defending ONE self-anointed “Worship Leader,” who is arrogantly displaying his imitated Charismatic behavior and prompting the congregants to act similarly? But why are you not defending the hundreds of members he has offended? And what makes you think he is the victim in this situation, instead of members he has victimized?
I’ll give you some credit, though. I gather that you now comprehend the specific subjects I write about—e.g., the “Worship Leader,” his “Praise Team” and their performances—and not about the “regular” members. There are notable differences.
Perhaps, I should remind you that the bringing in of Keith’s Praise Team, which intruded the second assembly one Sunday in 2001 (which at that time was “traditional” by “contemporary standards”) with the microphones and loud performances, was “the straw that broke the camel’s back.” Since that time, when alienated brethren—the ones offended and victimized—have fled in droves, the congregation has not been the same. I realize such as being unfortunate, but that’s reality.
For your information, I have offered the leadership the opportunity for anyone in opposition to rebut my viewpoints or to present or post articles that reflect what really happened to the congregation from a different perspective. That offer still stands.
You are correct about one thing—I “do not get anything out of church” … if you are speaking of the theatrical, made-for-TV “musical worship concert.”
(no login) 70.156.8.184
“Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 28 2006, 6:50 PM
-----Original Message----- From: Concerned Christian [concernedchristian__@_______.com] Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:08 AM To: Donnie Cruz Subject: Re: Madison Timeline # 10
Donnie,
The reason I defend him (Keith) is because I know him and his spirit is one of Service. From what I see in your comments about him is one of Anger and Hatred [image]. I am just calling it how I and many others see it.
Your problem is that you want a traditional service having one song leader rather than multiple and do want anyone raising Holy Hands you want folded hands in the lap. You do not want smiles [ ] on faces when they sing you want frowns [ ]. These are opinions Donnie. You make them Religion and use fancy words like infiltrate, and take over.
The church is changing. Like I said many times before, "the Message about Jesus is the same, but the way in which people express their love an devotion to Jesus is changing." I am not saying that your approach to the throne is wrong and will lead you to hell [image: devil with horns], but saying what Keith and others are doing that are a little more charismatic in their approach is wrong is something that I am not prepared to play God in.
The power of Jesus is bigger than a church assembly. And people do not go to be entertained. Just because they enjoy it does not mean they were entertained. The Spirit just moved them differently than someone else. Assembly time is about feeling. When people leave assemblies they want to be excited and upbeat about the Power of Jesus and the great things He is doing in their lives and how Satan has been crushed. Your approach is more Fire and Brimstone lessons; Scare the Crap out of People so they won't screw up...and if they do they better hurry up and pray so that God can forgive them. This fear practice is no longer being taught in progressive c of C's and for that I am eternally grateful!
CC
(no login) 68.19.204.53
No, the church is NOT CHANGING—it is BEING CHANGED by….
May 29 2006, 12:24 PM
CC,
O.K., on one hand, you gave us the reason why you defend the one person whose “spirit” you know. On the other hand, you gave us NO reason why you do not defend those whom he has offended, alienated and victimized. And I really question how you see “Anger and Hatred” [this would make an excellent title] in my comments and how you don’t see the same in yours.
We’ve been down this road before in our discussion, your mention of the following [with my brief response in brackets]—
One song leader vs. multiple. [Answer: The number is not an issue; actually, there are other men who are capable of starting a song or songs for FREE—this will eliminate wasting the saints’ collection in thousands of dollar$$$ annually to pay the very costly “Worship Leader” when it could be used for supporting world evangelism instead]
Raising “Holy Hands.” [Answer: I wonder if we need metal detectors prior to the assembly to determine which hands are “holy.” Oh, the women, too! Very carefully read I Tim. 2:8ff and the next chapter]
Smiles vs. frowns. [Answer: You must be referring to programmed, rhythmic JOY of noisy clapping. I see—handclapping induces smiles]
Opinions—you make them Religion. [Answer: Refresh my memory—when did I start a religion based on opinions? Read James 1:26-27 for a great definition of pure religion]
Fancy words like infiltrate, and take over. [Answer: What about smooth, subtle or at-first-undetected infiltration, subversion, division and eventual takeover?]
The church is changing. [Answer: Really!?! Or is it the RESULT of the subversive activities of the change agents and their changelings?]
The “Message about Jesus is the same.” [Answer: Who says otherwise? It’d better be!]
But “the way in which people express their love an devotion to Jesus is changing." [Answer: Haven’t I often mentioned “Charismatic IMITATION” enough? Come on, what about “originality” for once, instead of imitation? You know, originality (not imitation) is one main criterion used in judging competitive events such as your favorite event—smiles for man to see.]
The power of Jesus is bigger than a church assembly. [Answer: It is very poor analogy to compare the power of Jesus and a church assembly. In fact, you have equated a church assembly with “your entertainment at your worship center.” You really need to prove your point that a “church assembly” is about gathering for “musical worship.” New Testament scriptures for New Testament Christians regarding “musical worship,” … anyone?]
And people do not go to be entertained. [Answer: What a delusion on your part. Why do you think that the change agents resort to various and sundry means to get the people’s attention? Get real, CC.]
Just because they enjoy it does not mean they were entertained. [Answer: Just when did the assembly of the saints become an enjoyment? Did you forget Colossians and Ephesians in the truth that we are to speak to ONE ANOTHER … teaching and admonishing one another?]
The Spirit just moved them differently than someone else. Assembly time is about feeling. [Answer: Oh, now, the Spirit causes the individual to be moved—sounds like the “direct influence of the Spirit” doctrine. See what I mean about what “Charismatic imitation” does and teaches?
“Assembly time is about feeling.” Whoa, whoa, whoa!!! How absurd! I wouldn’t even waste my time negating this nonsense! Just go to an opera or a hard rock concert—you’ll get it there.]
Your approach is more Fire and Brimstone lessons; Scare the Crap out of People so they won't screw up...and if they do they better hurry up and pray so that God can forgive them. [Answer: Spending hours to debate your issues would be a waste of time. I see that you no longer have any respect for God’s Word. Start your own church, CC. Please do not disturb the majority of peaceable churches that disagree with you.]
Let me just quote PPB’s remarks from another thread—more evidence of what you are proposing to change the church that Christ established and owns:
“It goes to show how shallow we have become. How much we need to be entertained. It's called a "short attention span". We can't expect our fellow Christians to actually sit down and study the REAL BIBLE! That would be too boring, too old-fashioned, too serious. Oh, wait - to eye-opening to the real truth. Now I get the premise behind such silly lessons. Those silly change-agents, they really do know how to water-down the scriptures. Golly-gee whiz!”
Donnie
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.163.170
Re: “Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 29 2006, 1:47 PM
I've notice that Concerned Christian has a penchant for using the word "crap." Is that a Christian word? I don't find it in any biblical translation, even the most "modern" ones which are supposed to be more on a level with today's street language. I don't believe that even the most "modern" translation today would, for example, paraphrase the stoning of Stephen as, "and they jumped on him, dragged him out of the city, and stoned the crap out of him until he died."
Even "modern" translations have some sense of propriety, if nothing else.
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: “Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 30 2006, 10:23 PM
The word could be better used in this sentence: This entire web site is crap!!!
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.64.212
Re: “Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 31 2006, 1:42 AM
Anonymous: "The word could be better used in this sentence: This entire web site is crap!!!"
And from the sewer cometh the language of the sewer, the excrement of a lost soul.
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: “Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 31 2006, 11:45 AM
And ONLY condemnation from your part!!! Do you really think you will win lost souls with your attitude?
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.164.73
Re: “Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 31 2006, 10:24 PM
Anonymous: "Do you really think you will win lost souls with your attitude?"
Christians refrain from using the word "crap" or any other forms of vulgarity, no matter how much they dislike or disagree with someone. Lost souls despise the Word of God and use the word "crap" and other forms of vulgarity. Is your soul lost? If you say that you are a born-again Christian and yet still freely use crude, vulgar words like "crap," then something has gone quite wrong in your life. You manifest blind anger. I urge you to cast off the language of the sewer and the gutter, seek forgiveness and redemption from Christ, and find peace.
Jimmy Joe (no login) 68.52.127.150
Wrong term
June 1 2006, 12:32 AM
B. You must realize that you are being chatised not for what you are posting but for using the wrong term. The word you should use is "dung". That is the acceptable word as it is used profusely by Saint Sublett in practially all of his post.
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: Wrong term
June 1 2006, 8:24 PM
OK, I repent. This web site is a load of Dung!!! No matter what you call it, it stinks, and you boys only stir it, so it stinks more.
"Let he that is without sin cast the first stone"
I gather that some of you on this site think you "do no wrong" I get this feeling because everyone else is wrong and you are right. Just ask yourself!
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hello,
I was thinking it was the other way around—a commonality among those who continue to bash the church and claim to have “found” God’s abundant grace [“like never before”] and are, therefore, free to say and do as they please [calling it “freedom in Christ”] … not concerned about sinning [because God’s grace does “continue to abound”] … unwilling to abide by the doctrine of Christ and His apostles [because doctrine does not matter—“it’s all about relationship”]. Hello!?!
Caution: I would urge you to take your posts of such nature to an(other) website(s) that are not “a load of Dung!!!”
Thank you
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 65.1.221.199 on Jun 1, 2006 10:38 PM
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: Wrong term
June 2 2006, 12:02 AM
It's OK for you to beat up on anyone that does not conform to your way of thinking, But, when someone disagrees with you they are told to go away??????
BYE BYE
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.19.69.136
Re: Wrong term
June 2 2006, 12:10 PM
Anonymous: “It's OK for you to beat up on anyone that does not conform to your way of thinking, But, when someone disagrees with you they are told to go away??????”
Actually, people have two options on this site:
Option 1: People have the option to post civil messages with Christian attitudes and without abusive language (insults, character assassinations, profanity/vulgarity).
Option 2. People have the option to go elsewhere if they don’t like Option 1.
It’s as simple as that.
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.125.96
Re: “Madison Timeline # 10”—Continued
May 27 2006, 3:43 PM
Until "Concerned Christian"overcomes his OWN cowardice and reveals his true identity, he has no grounds to accuse anyone else of cowardice. Mote and beam, my son, mote and beam. CC should seek professional help about anger management, because he is pathologically obsessed with running down this web site. But as long as he wastes his hours belittling and reviling this web site, which stands for absolute biblical TRUTH, he will NEVER find any peace.
(no login) 65.1.221.199
“Doctrine” Is Unimportant; a Teen “into Dancing”
June 3 2006, 3:04 PM
I wonder if there is a “leadership battle” brewing between Madison’s “Worship Leader” and “Preaching Leader.” You see—what is known as the contemporary “worship service” can extend up to 90 minutes (much of which is devoted to “musical service” of up to 18 [including several silly-singy-clappy-rocky-charismatic “praise”] musical pieces.
And, of course, only about 20 minutes or less of a watered-down “gospel” sermon, including designed made-to-laugh stories and personal jokes.
Who do you think gets to look up above, “lifting up holy hands” (I Tim. 2:8), and proudly pray, “[Know this, in case You didn’t, that] we come to You to ‘worship’ You.”
Who gets to lead the “congregational applause” after a “joyful noise” from a Christian Rock Praise music or an upbeat, highly rhythmic “hymn” has been completed? Who do you think grabs the opportunity and honor to say, “… and the church says [Amen!!!]?
Is it the “Worship Leader” or the preaching servant? Go … figure. Hmmm!?!
By the way, this past Sunday, in the sermon titled, “Enni-Meanie-Minny-Moe,” there were 3 major points brought up: (a) Look for an encouraging church; (b Look for the church where people love each other; and (c) Look for a church that lifts up Jesus. Okay, good practical points—references used were from Col. 2:1-5; Eph. 4:29; Acts 4:12.
What’s troubling, though, was the statement made concerning the diminishing importance of the doctrine of Christ and the emphasis on relationships: “The basis for unity is not the church sign … not the doctrine nailed down …; it’s all about right relationships.”
Regarding the “church sign,” this has not been an issue among loyal church members who know that the church building is not the church, but that the church sign is only for public information. Can you imagine a building without a sign or a home or mailbox without the street number? You see, change advocates in the brotherhood make the “church sign” an issue because they’re trying to convince folks that “Community Church-ism” is the way to go—either being nameless or dropping the name “of Christ.”
What about the devaluation of the doctrine of Christ and His apostles?
II John 1:9-10—“Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed.”
I Timothy 4—“[13] Till I come, give attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. … [16] Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.”
II Timothy 4—“[2] Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. [3] For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears.”
Relationship—is this all about “feelings”? Interestingly, I haven’t found in the entire Bible a single reference to the word “relation” or “relationship.” But take for granted that maybe there’s another word or words that define the word “relationship.” Could it be a matter of simply verbally affirming the expression, “Lord, please know that I love You and that I love my neighbor as myself”? My Bible tells me that “love” is not passive. But that love is an action that involves being a servant to our Master … that involves obeying God’s commandments. John 14:15; 15:10—“If ye love me, keep my commandments. … If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.”
Oh, about leadership—Phil’s introduction: “… Do you come here [for assembly] because of the preacher … Nah [with a grin] … or, do you come here because of the Worship Leader?” Hmmm!
Lest I forget [from where I was seated not far from where I usually sit in “my” balcony, and from a different angle], I saw a female teen doing the 360-degree spin dance at least twice while the “praise” music was being “joyfully” sung despite the word “mourning” in the verses of “This Is How We Overcome.” This is a 5/16 song—5 words repeated 16 times (or about that many times)—I’ve lost track of the number of times that “This is how we overcome” is repeated. Anyway, the spin dance [when it is performed] occurs while singing, “You have TURNED my mourning into DANCING.” Yeah, right, a good demonstration of “worship in spirit and in truth.”
Dr. Bill Crump (no login) 66.217.125.138
Jesus and Relationships
June 3 2006, 3:29 PM
In an issue of The Torch, a periodical published by Lipscomb University, there was once a similar article about Jesus and relationships. The Bible professor writing the article posed the premise that the principal reason for Christ's incarnation was not to die on the cross to redeem mankind from their sins, but to establish Himself as a liason to create better relationships between God and man.
So the social aspect of Christ now takes precedence over His ultimate, atoning sacrifice for our sins. Sins now take a back seat to relationships. And that's where the modern church of Christ is headed.
B (no login) 70.238.52.169
Re: Jesus and Relationships
June 3 2006, 10:03 PM
I wonder if there is a “leadership battle” brewing between Madison’s “Worship Leader” and “Preaching Leader.” You see—what is known as the contemporary “worship service” can extend up to 90 minutes (much of which is devoted to “musical service” of up to 18 [including several silly-singy-clappy-rocky-charismatic “praise”] musical pieces.
Donnie,
You may have already covered this ground, but why do you continue to go to Madison. I'm not asking in the spirit that they could move forward without you. I'm coming more from the angle of, how can you continue to worship in a way that you think is not what God desires, when there are other congregations available to you that worship in ways that you do think God desires. Madison is obviously not going to move back to the pattern you think is right. Do you not feel that God demands of you to be somewhere that you can worship Him in the way He demands?
Please don't read too much into that. It's an honest question. I've been to a couple of worship services where I had to get up and leave, and I can't imagine feeling that way every Sunday.
Anonymous (no login) 65.7.67.131
What a Joke!!!
June 3 2006, 10:38 PM
Dr. Crump says:
"People have the option to post civil messages with Christian attitudes and without abusive language (insults, character assassinations, profanity/vulgarity)".
Yet in the very next post, Donnie Cruz (one of the moderators) violates that rule. However, he will say he is voicing the "truth" and the rest of us are "change agents" trying to corrupt his style (the only way) to worship. It would seem it's about 2000 to 1 against him. I actually believe Donnie has completely lost all sense of Chistianity, and only does this because he enjoys stirring the "dung"
You can call this post anything you wish. (insults, character assassinations, profanity/vulgarity)
IT IS ONLY MY OPINION!!!
VERY VERY SAD!!!
Anonymous (no login) 68.52.253.237
Re: What a joke!
June 4 2006, 10:39 PM
Donnie,
I'm interested in your response to this post
(no login) 65.1.221.199
A Christian Family That Has Left Madison
June 4 2006, 9:56 PM
There has been a very important reminder posted this evening. It would take some time to locate this particular post above. So, I am reconstructing the scenario which prompted this poster to respond in such a manner as you will notice below.
As I have more often than not discussed issues related to Madison’s “Worship Leader” and his “Praise Team,” I thought at this point that it was time to have some discussion of issues surrounding the preaching of God’s Word in our postmodern culture. So, I began with the following subject. [Please note that I’m listing only certain responses that would directly point to this poster’s revealing message.]
_____________________________________
DONNIE: Now It’s the “Senior Pulpit Minister’s” Turn (March 6 2006, 8:05 AM)
. . . Well, it appears that Mr. Phil Barnes has spent time here [at this site] and has learned how serious the situation is when a congregation delves into and implements unnecessary and destructive changes that incite controversy and alienate half of its members. Let’s just turn it around instead—i.e., the Change Movement is the highly infectious spiritual disease.
RESPONDENT: Re: Now It’s the “Senior Pulpit Minister’s” Turn (March 6 2006, 10:12 PM)
... if you don't like it, go somewhere else!
DONNIE: Somewhere else? (March 6 2006, 11:53 PM)
No! If you intrude, go somewhere else or start your own from scratch!
Sorry, but I arrived first. The change agents ignored the signs: “OCCUPIED” and “NO VACANCY.” They also ignored other signs: “YOU WERE NOT INVITED” and “GO AWAY! ”
Frankly, I believe you are “concerned” that your non-instrumental congregation is not changing as you wish it would. If that’s the case, go somewhere else where the inanimate musical instruments could participate in admonishing you and others, as well as in letting the word of Christ dwell in you richly.
RESPONDENT: Re: Somewhere else? (March 7 2006, 1:22 PM)
You were the first? You helped open the doors to Madison in 1934? You obviously are not 'fitting in" so why subject yourself to such turmoil? You are "Outnumbered" go somewhere else. ….
NEW POSTER: why? i already left madison turmoil (no login) 172.165.134.63 SUBJECT: somewheres else DATE: June 4 2006, 7:40 PM
you and your attitude is exactly the reason i took my family and ran from madison. when i first started in the 1990, i thought madison was where it was at. then your faction decided it was good to disturb the Lord's church.
instead of going out on your own, like they used to do, you used the firemarshal as an excuse and came in and bumped us out. ok. and how biblical is that? i dont trust you or your kind. and that goes for keith lancaster and the praise team. you know full well in your heart that instrumental music, dancing, and getting jiggy is not biblical.and i fear it is to follow. to prove the fact at the 10:30 service when steve flatt first revisited, well, where were all the jumpers and hand clappers? was it respect for steve or fear and guilt? either way, the silence of the hand clappers was deaffening and why? because you know you are wrong for doing it.
that's right. we are outnumbered and so were the apsotles. but that didnt stop them from spreading the gospel. paul fought the good fight.
dont think for a minute that you are pulling anything off. your deceipt is apparent.
now, since i probably will not revisit this site ever again because of the deep depression i feel at "christians" quarrleing, go ahead, all of you and persecute me with your gramatical criticisms and justifications for following your true leader. Even he, satan, can quote scripture for his own good. you have assisted him in breaking up one of the greatest bodies of Christ. and look out while we are fighting each other (while the church continues to divide) for the muslims. i pray for all of us that he forgive us for what we do.
i just have one last request: out of respect for Christ, keep the building that we helped fund for so many years, but please change the name.
_____________________________________
Our sincere thanks to the new poster—the message speaks volumes. There’s not anything else I can add, change or remove from it.
Don’t you still see what the ConcernedMembers website has been warning other congregations about?
Donnie
(no login) 65.1.221.199
The Fire Marshal, the “Worship Leader,” and the Praise Team
June 6 2006, 10:21 PM
This is really worth exclaiming!!! One of the best evidences thus far coming from one family among many that have left Madison—here it is with my emphases in []:
Instead of going out on your own = [Or starting from scratch],
Like they used to do = [Without the subtle subversion and eventual takeover],
You used the fire marshal as an excuse = [Oh, the basement was a fire hazard because of overcrowding during charismatic activities …]
And came in and bumped us out = [This would give us, intruders, the right to go barging into the cozy and spacious auditorium already occupied by the peaceful brethren at 10:30 a.m.]….
I don’t trust you = [Change Agents]
Or your kind = [Change advocates, followers and supporters],
And that goes for Keith Lancaster = [The “Worship Leader” whose $$$alary for “paid services for the Master” is taken from the saints’ collection]
And the “Praise Team” = [Keith’s elite musical performers with amplifiers].
Do you get the picture?
Only the Lord knows how MANY families have been alienated and left because of such problems that STILL EXIST?
Only the Lord knows how MANY families have the desire to return to Madison once the root cause of the problems has been eliminated.
Donnie
(no login) 65.1.221.199
The “ANNUAL CORPORATION MEETING” Thingy
June 8 2006, 11:16 PM
Were the churches of Christ in Jerusalem, Rome, Ephesus, Corinth, Galatia, Thessalonica, etc., incorporated? I found the following announcement in the Marcher (Vol. 55, No. 08, May 28, 2006) and in the worship guide in regard to Madison Church of Christ, Incorporated:
Madison Church of Christ
ANNUAL CORPORATION
MEETING
Wednesday, June 7th
6 p.m.
In the Auditorium
Madison Family Day
June 4th
9 a.m. Sunday School —— 10 a.m. Combined Worship
THEN GO TO
Valley View Camp for a catered meal, lots of activities and entertainment!
So, how did the chairperson handle the meeting of the corporation yesterday?
So, would you guess if the contemporary congregants were at their best behavior while the “traditional” folks from the 8:00 a.m. period were in the COMBINED gathering at 10:00 a.m.?
(no login) 65.1.221.199
But . . . is church incorporating required by law?
June 10 2006, 2:32 PM
-----Original Message----- From: Concerned Christian [concernedchristian23@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:34 PM To: Donnie Cruz Subject: Corporation Meetings at my Old Church
Hey Brother Donnie,
I was reading your post about the Corporation Meeting. I use to minister at a church and we had "Corporation" Meetings and it was Federal Law that we elect a board to put on the "paperwork." It was more for formality sake than anything. After the closing prayer on of the Elders would get up and ask the congregation if they would like to nominate any new board members and that was about it. Not sure what the Madison meeting is about, but that was what we had to do because of the law.