Place your banner ad here.          See all banner ads

...ConcernedMembers.com ...About ...Links Library ...Sunday School in Exile ...Help Warn Others

Where is my NewThisWeek Email subscription?......Click Here

Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

An Online Conversation with the “Worship Leader’s” Wife’s Dad

July 25 2006 at 2:41 AM
  (no login)
from IP address 65.1.221.16

It’s been mentioned a number of times before that the reports here are not “fair and balanced.” I don’t quite understand that since I feel that this forum is open to opposing sides of issues. In fact, I have made an offer to someone to feel free to submit his own messages, viewpoints, complaints and rebuttals and to be assured that the other side is also represented here.

So, I would like to take this opportunity [or risk] to post what one side has to say about the other and vice versa. The messages from either side will be posted separately and in the order in which they appear at another site. In this way, a respondent can freely post a message just below the issue s/he might be interested in.

    There was a question posed:

      “Donnie, I hear all the talk that you are not even a member at Madison, yet you attend there and seem to care about what goes on with the congregation, yet if you are not a member then why not? If you are not I liken this to complaining about government, but never even voting. If you do not wish to address this here email me …. [TRH]”

    I responded:

      TRH,

      Sorry ... I just now found this. (The short title got my attention, finally.) I was reading so many "interesting posts" with today's date and finally got to near the top thread.

      Well, I've been attending Madison since 1987 +/- Then, the attendance was in the 3100s. Big place, right? As we know all about Madison's sad and unfortunate experiences, many folks have left since the havoc in 2001 early. I intend to stay until I decide otherwise.

      YTBH is correct about the directories with my invisible image(s). She and others have the right to believe what/how they feel or think about me. Anyway, regardless of what's happened at Madison, I have considered myself a member there. More importantly, my name is in the Book of Life -- no one in this world can take that away from me.

      I hope I have given you the info you wanted to know.

      I can't promise any quick responses, but you're welcome to correspond with me:

      DonnieCruz@msn.com

      Thanks for asking! [Untruth Buster]

    TRH’s reaction:

      Donnie,

      I was just curious, thanks for the info. I attended Lipscomb in 96&97 and knew several people that attended there, and also from Middle Tennessee, so I had always heard about the size of the congregation. Do not think I was saying you have no right to voice your opinion, I was just wondering if you were a member there. Why so slow with Sunday School in Exile. Six months ago there were good Bible based posts and discussion and now it is a graveyard?


    Meanwhile, someone else was asking me about Jim Mankin while the preacher at Madison … to which I responded:

      No, I wasn't there at the time, although I had heard about him. Steve Flatt was the minister and Nick Boone was the humble pitch-piper ... when I started. [No, he didn't use a different pitch pipe for every different note. ]

Now, as to how this particular thread has turned into something between Madison’s “Worship Leader” and me … I can’t explain. We’ll just have to wait and see as his father-in-law [“peck” in this case] responds often in his defense.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
peck
(no login)
65.1.221.16

A bad report from Donnie

July 25 2006, 2:56 AM 

I suppose that any of us might find negativeness in our congregations...It's normal..

What I see missing is the positive happenings that are not being expressed by Donnie..

When I visit,my soul is always inspired by it's worship service...Keith has an agenda to get everyone to sing..That's his talent...Have any of you noticed in congregations now that very few are singing..It's tough to combat this habit that some congregations are into..At Madison,the church sings..

Anything that goes on at Madison is first class...Whether it is the prayer leader..The announcements..The presider over the communion...great preaching,full of truth and presented in a way that keeps the listeners alert...and best of all..He gets the point out in less than an hour..Children are behaved and actually participate in the services at times..

I hardly ever visit when there is no responses..My heart is touched by the way that the congregation ..both men,women and elders gather around those who respond and pray and encourage them..And I've witnessed more baptism's at Madison than any other congregation I've attended..and the baptism scene is always so inspiring ...

Does 3000 make a more righteous congregation than one with fewer attendees...I have a hard time finding a parking place and at times cannot find a seat downstairs...The building is located in an area that would not pull attendees into it's services so easily...I understand that many of it's members drive long distances to attend...So much positive thinking is going on at Madison that Donnie's efforts are not bothering them at all...Their tolerance for Donnie is only one more star for their great efforts to turn people toward our Lord..

If anyone has received a bad report from Donnie without investigating and have arrived at a judgement of Madison..You have an obligation to see for yourself ..Just visit some..

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
walt
(no login)
65.1.221.16

The Pharisees and hypocrites

July 25 2006, 3:05 AM 

[fyi: walt is an ex-church member; Donnie is Untruth Buster]

Those like untruth and piney will do anything to protect their traditional upbringing (which is based upon ego centric characteristics, a main reason why untruth won't leave Madison and why piney supports this carnal logic). Jesus no doubt would include them in this saying:

"Woe to you, scribes and pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves." Matt 23:15


 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
65.1.221.16

The heart that is judging the worship style

July 25 2006, 3:10 AM 

Walt,
Good morning..my brother...I know our hearts are common but I must disagree with you about untruth buster...He's just human not spiritualy deficit...

A lot of us in the CoC have a problem dealing with anger management..The problem is not the worship style it's the heart that is judging the worship style...It may have been a good idea for the HS to advise that each congregation select leaders to oversee the work connected to the assembly...No congregation that I know of has leadership that the members don't gossip about the elders...Agreeing and disagreeing with them..Donnie just went overboard ...that's all..grace works in those situations..

One thing positive is that he stayed and others who left and are trying to settle the matter while attending other congregaions are out of line...The opposing elders should have stayed and sorted things out to hold the unity instead of leaving...

None of my buisness,I know...Just wish for mutual understanding and tolerance be appreciated in all congregations..It's tough out there for church leaders in both anti and liberal positions...I'm facing some tough times myself and don't need religion but I do need help in raising my faith level..You do that for me..Thanks

God bless Walt,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
literal seed
(no login)
65.1.221.16

God has been pruning the branches

July 25 2006, 3:15 AM 

AMEN!!!

God has been pruning the branches there to bear more good fruit for His Kingdom. The fruit is becoming more abundant. I look forward to the local outreach that must take place to the needy in our community from the Hispanic heritage. We need that revival to demonstrate His power and stop focusing on our abilities. Through the last 5 years of challenge God has been faithful. It's understandable how the elders have had reservations regarding available resources for that cause. I see their faith increasing regularly and continue to pray for them and lift them up in support.

blessings and peace,
ls


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
65.1.221.16

What you’re hearing is the 16-member Praise Team

July 25 2006, 3:20 AM 

Peck,

I beg to differ with several of your statements:

What you’re hearing is the 16-member Praise Team (the milder terminology for the progressive “church choir”). Their handheld microphones are rigged so that what’s heard is like a thousand voices. As wave runner has said about the “sound effects” of instrumental music “participating,” many of the congregants don’t sing—they listen to the performances. I’m sure Peck thoroughly enjoys the female PT vocalist when she performs her solo [not necessarily a desirable, but is a distraction to me and others, I’m sure] when the bread is being passed around. When there are handheld microphones used, there are performances involved. Congregational singing is becoming extinct where there is a Praise Team singing for and to the congregation, just as when IM is used. Your relative, Madison’s “Worship Leader,” is enjoying himself in wagging his arms, prompting folks to clap-clap, clap-clap-clap (this is “programmed” JOY to them) and applaud after a beautiful musical performance.

[Will continue this chapter when time allows it.]

U.B.

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
65.1.221.16

Go to other assemblies that do not have a praise team and...

July 25 2006, 3:29 AM 

Donnie,

Go to other assemblies that do not have a praise team and you will also find people not singing....It's getting worse..Have you visited the traditional service at Madison..that does not have the praise team? Do you find more people singing at that service? It is difficult to get a response of everyone singing now..but..maybe it doesn't matter..My thoughts are that meditating on the message within the songs may mean more inspiration than singing out ....Isn't that allowing someone to encourage you through singing? Speaking to oneanother through singing...

As I sat in the balcony,I could not see the singers who were sitting in the pews which we call the praise team...What you hear is not only them but a blend of the voices downstairs that are singing in harmony with them and the song leader..It gives a sound like a praise team,when actualy it is the congregation..

Where I sit,I cannot hear the praise team because of the people around me and behind me are so loud with their singing..and the praise team is only a few feet from where I sit...My thoughts were...turn up the mikes..but Keith is devoted to congregational participation and will not turn them up...I agree..The people around me have voices that are in harmony and are louder than the praise team..I think you are hearing them along with the praise team and are confused..thinking all the beautiful harmony is coming from the praise team alone...

One of the most outstanding singing occasions that I witnessed last year was when Madison's worship leader led a group of mainline CoC in song without a praise team at all..It was in a different city...Many congregations came together for a songfest..The huge place was packed and it was a congregational outpouring of blended voices that were out of this world..You could feel the inspiration of those people as they lifted their voices in song...And they were a blend of conservative CoC...

Were you there a few weeks ago when the traditional and contemporary met together at Madison..no praise team..just blended voices..Keith was so proud..Voices being lifted up to our Lord is his agenda..not waving arms..It's not about him...It's about using talents to make the worship service complete in a professional way...

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
65.1.221.16

Correct ... No microphones were used by Praise Team at Combined...

July 25 2006, 3:37 AM 

Peck,

We can have very lengthy discussions over this Praise Team thingy and its performances. I really think you are very deluded. Maybe I have a hearing problem; maybe you do. You have not addressed the performance issue. Whenever microphones are used -- and why should the choir use them -- performance is obvious. When applause occurs after a song, the performance of the P.T. is being praised.

Peck, I'm not denying the fact that there are some people who will never sing. That's not really surprising, is it? You're mentioning that as if it were a new phenomenon. Where have you been all these years to not notice that before?

All the music going on right now is mostly about feel-good music, all the rah-rah-rah and all the clapping [rehearsed and programmed JOY] is all encouraged and prompted by your son-in-law. All that cheerleading would be best at sport events and concerts; entertainment has no place in the gathering of the saints. I now know for a fact that you don't have a clue about the erroneous messages that some of the contemporary musical pieces bring forth. Many of the contemporary Christian ROCK music pieces are written by POP ROCK ARTISTS who know very little about the truth. The mention of Jesus or the word "divine" does not necessarily mean scriptural. These power-hungry, money-making ROCK ARTISTS ... well, never mind.

I would like to mention to Keith Lancaster, your beloved son-in-law, musicator at Madison, to disband the Praise Team, unless they STOP using the microphones. God is not deaf; he listens to the HUMBLE heart -- not to anyone who brags about praising Him with loud noise -- "Oh, I love you, God ... I love You!" This self-motivating proclamation is so silly and despicable as if God has lost His awareness of what man thinks and feels.

Perhaps, I can relate my own version of what happened on that day when it was a "combined" worship at Madison. Again, you were experiencing delusion. Did you mention that NO MICROPHONES WERE USED at all by the Praise Team?????????????????? But you said that the blending of voices was great? That's exactly what I'm talking about. It was back to real congregational singing!!!! I would say, however, that the Praise Team was there -- the PT members were either scattered or seated together in the front rows as usual BUT WITHOUT THE MICROPHONES.

Would you do me a favor? Would you mention to Keith to dunk those microphones in the baptistery or give them to concert performers? I'm beginning to think that God is offended by all the outward appearances. He is NOT DEAF! He listens to the heart -- not to the amplifiers!!!

How can I explain that to you any further?

Pray for Keith for him to not make himself the center of attention, not to even begin to think that there is nothing about musical idolatry or idolatry of musical talent involved in his behavior on stage as he thinks he is leading the congregation into God's holy presence with musical entertainment. And please don't mention to me that "it's all for God's glory" ... yeah, right!

When 75% of the assembly time of 90 minutes is about the concert, I become suspicious of the intent of the "Worship Leader" -- no such thingy in the NT assembly of the saints. I cannot imagine the early Christians listening to the postmodern concept of having a "Worship Leader" and a Praise Team. I thought they were devoted to studying God's word -- not to music lessons and performances.

Please think about all this, Peck.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
Walt
(no login)
65.1.221.16

Self pride--even if Donnie is right and if Madison [leadeship] is wrong

July 26 2006, 7:25 PM 

[fyi: walt is an ex-church member; Donnie is Untruth Buster]

peck,

The mentality of untruth (as seen by his posts and by knowing others first hand like him) have only one purpose in their agenda, and that is to tear down what Madison has built up from their biblical stance.... untruth's ego won't let him leave and because of this he lack's Christ like humility. Madison's humility has tolerated untruth's stubburn pride in all this. Even if untruth really thinks he is right and Madison is wrong, humility in this senario must take place by him - but what has taken place instead is - SELF PRIDE. In this case there has to be a departure before a reconciliation. [walt]


+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Edited to identify poster as "walt" instead of "anonymous" {content unchanged}


    
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 65.1.221.16 on Jul 26, 2006 7:42 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
ServantForHim
(no login)
65.1.221.16

"You have a problem with the Praise Team using microphones, but not the preacher?"

July 26 2006, 7:30 PM 

[ServantForHim attends an "a cappella" (non-instrumental) congregation ... and is about to become an elder]

U.B.:
Can't applause and that clapping be for God??? You have a problem with clapping and applauding God? How do you know that the clapping is for the Praise Team?
Donnie, everyone should sing. Like you said, God hears them. God doesn't hear bad notes. He hears the heart. So what if a person isn't a good singer. Sing anyway. It is about Praising God, remember Donnie?

You have a problem with the Praise Team using microphones, but not the preacher? If God can hear the Praise Team without mics, then the assemby and God can hear the preacher. The storys of this countrie' first preachers were of those who spoke to thousands, and never used mics. Why do you not say anything about the preacher, or just a single song leader using the microphone?
You have problems with the words 'Oh, I love you God....I love You!'
Donnie, I believe that it might be you that has problems. Hmmmmm???
Chrisitan music pieces are not written by POP ROCK ARTISTS? They are written by Christians. Period.
You sound like a bah humbug Scrooge. Uh oh, I better not get you started with Christmas.
Most of all, go to a church where you enjoy worshipping. Good grief man! You know God can't be happy with your attitude. It is painful!

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
65.1.221.16

"Before the split" (an admission); ... and "fire hazard' fear factor

July 26 2006, 7:38 PM 

[fyi: peck--Keith Lancaster's father-in-law]

Donnie,
Your perception of Holy entertainment is in your mind..You are entitled
to your opinion..but..Are you an elder? If you are elected as an elder,then have your say in their meetings...Those who are members can express feelings but are not the decision makers..The elders gave the worship leader a job to do..He does it...Before the split..The worship leader had the responsibility of one traditional service early and one traditional service later..He did not get to assemble with the contemporary service in the basement since both were going on at the same time....After so many people assembled in the basement and a fire hazard appeared..Only 2 services were available..instead of 3 services,the worship leader was responsible for a contemporary and a traditional service..not 3 as was previous..His job was to handle each service as his job required....It's not about him.. It's about handling the job that the elders are trying to do in decency and in order...No defense is needed by me..You have first class elders and first class participation in the service..Just submit to church authority ...You are confused but I see in you a change from anger to communicating on a more mature level..No one could be any more childish than I..we're just sinners saved by grace..

Have a blessed day,Peck

Walt..thanks

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
65.1.221.16

The Praise Team performs with microphones.

July 26 2006, 7:48 PM 

No, Servant for whomever, you are the confused one in the church. I've heard of all your arguments for IM, etc. And you're correct about one thing -- all these other animations and inanimate objects participating with you in how you PERCEIVE the gathering of the saints should be are extraneous and unnecessary.

Your logic concerning the preacher using the microphone is illogical. He doesn't need it if he can be heard; he needs it if he needs to be heard. And so it is with one who leads singing.

The Praise Team performs with microphones. If God doesn't need the microphone because he listens from the heart, there is no reason for God to listen to the "Worship Leader's" ... um ... "Praise Team" with microcphones because He isn't deaf. God is not deaf -- is that not sinking in? Therefore, if the Praise Team does not use their handheld microphones [uh-oh ... PERFORMANCE!!!] for God to listen to, what is the obvious conclusion? The Praise Team is performing!

SFH, we've heard this often -- "it's about God, not about me." What about replacing the bragging and self-patting ["Oh, I love you, God ... Oh, I just love you so much" as if God didn't already know the person's heart] ... with "I need Thee every hour, most gracious Lord; stay Thou nearby ... temptations lose their power when Thou are nigh."

So, your arguments for the "Praise Team" and the "Worship Leader" are no different from your arguments for instrumental music.

I think you should "join" another church of your choice that already has all these things you desire. I would urge you not to stir up trouble in any congregations (99.9% of them) that are opposed to IM and all these other extraneous, controversial, unnecessary changes.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Max Moon
(no login)
67.177.83.89

Faithsite: Concerned Members Extension?

July 27 2006, 11:29 PM 

Is this the Faithsite: Concerned Members extension?

Go away for a few days and things change.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
72.154.211.19

More Like “‘Worship Leader’ Exposed: an Extension”

July 28 2006, 8:05 AM 

Dr. Max, it’s more like an extended exposure of the “Worship Leader” and his accompanying instruments, the “Praise Team.” So, were you on vacation for a few days?

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Bill Crump
(no login)
66.217.165.157

Re: Faithsite: Concerned Members Extension?

July 28 2006, 8:58 AM 

Since there's already a "ConcernedMembers: FaithSite Extension, because CM folks frequently post over there, how could there ever be a "FaithSite: CM Extension," when so few of the liberal, spiritual mavericks from FaithSite post here?

 
 Respond to this message   
ServantForHim
(no login)
72.154.211.19

So then, the Praise Team is NOT performing.

July 28 2006, 8:12 AM 

[ServantForHim is an elder-to-be]

U.B.:
I hope you aren't a big person because if you are then this type of behavior and stress can't be good on your health.

The preachers that spoke to thousands back in the 1800s didn't need one. Jesus didn't need one speaking from the mountain, did He?, and He was outside.

"He doesn't need it if he can be heard, he needs it if he needs to be heard."
Couldn't that apply to the Praise Team. People want to hear the harmony parts of the Praise Team. The microphones enhance that part that the altos, or tenors,etc. need to hear. Some people can't read music, but can hear their parts when sung by someone else.
There ya go U.B.
So then, the Praise Team is NOT performing.
Hey U.B.....why not singing both "Oh I love you God," and "I need thee every hour."

Hey U.B. I will stick to my church. I am not creating a stir by staying there. It seems that you are by staying at Madison. The bad thing too U.B. is that you aren't staying there because you like, but just out of pure spite!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
72.154.211.19

My decision to stay or leave ... my own volition

July 28 2006, 8:15 AM 

SFH,

I hope you're not behaving now like Walt -- the Great Spiritual Judge. I know he has influenced you that MUCH! Remember, I've been with Madison since the late 80's. The intrusion did not take place way AFTER that. So, you leave my decision to stay or leave according to my own volition.

In your case, I am just glad that you are not stirring up trouble in your church where you are about to become an elder. My advice to you is to not make the same mistake that the elders of Madison made by allowing the intrusion to occur. Or, by making the intrusion YOURSELF. You should know better than that -- I would hope so.

My remark that troublemakers should leave peaceful and peaceable churches alone remains. It is common knowledge by the way -- that intrusion, deviation, perversion, interference should be avoided because they ALWAYS cause trouble or havoc in the church.

My remark that you should seek another place where your desires are met [instrumental music, Praise Team, self-appointed "Worship Leader," applauding God "reverently and in awe" (is this possible with rhythmic handclapping like sports cheerleaders do ... hmmm!)] ... also remains as is.

What about the Christian Church? Just perfect for you.

U.B.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Max Moon
(no login)
67.177.83.89

Re: My decision to stay or leave ... my own volition

July 28 2006, 10:17 AM 

Naw, I was working, so I didn't have much time to be on. I had family visiting, and then my internet was down for 36 hours.

 
 Respond to this message   
Myth Buster
(no login)
70.156.25.18

"I don't hug just anyone...."

July 29 2006, 2:16 AM 

I was at a church of Christ in west Texas where the preacher man told everyone to just hug the person next to you. Talk about made to feel uncomfortable.

I don't hug just anyone, and it needs to be my idea. Stupid. Just plain stupid.

They don't have any organized hugging orgies at Madison, do they?


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
70.156.25.18

"Clap Your Hands": a Charismatic/Contemporary Hymn

July 29 2006, 2:23 AM 

Myth Buster,

Something "organized ... like that" happens at Madison on occasion. There's a song titled, "We Will Stand," that the "Worship Leader" loves to sing and motions everyone to hold hands throughout the entire song. Why? You know, sometimes I wonder about the maturity of those who lead who take things literally physically. The song says, "You're my brother, you're my sister, SO TAKE ME BY THE HAND...." The words put into action make one think: "[Since I have a bad cold, coughing and sneezing non-stop], what an opportunity to share my misery and my germs with others." Hmmm!

There's also a Contemporary, Charismatic "Christian Rock Music" HYMN titled "Clap Your Hands" [not kidding, BTW] that the leader and his Praise Team performs for the congregation. The Team and the willing participants thoroughly enjoy this "love feast" as they sing, "Clap your hands all ye people, shout to God with a voice of triumph, clap your hands ... Alleluia, alleluia! Alleluia, alleluiah!"

Oddly, the adults in the auditorium sing this singy-clappy song while the children have already left to meet for their own "Children's Worship" AWAY from the rest of their families in the auditorium.

Silly geese!

U.B.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
70.156.25.18

Contemporary Style: Tired, standing for long minutes during "praise"

July 29 2006, 2:29 AM 

M.B.,

Forgot something. It is not uncommon in a few congregations where there is a long period of "Praise" Music with instructions from the "Worship Leader" for the congregants to stand up all the time while singing a series of singy-clappy praise songs.

There are not that many who lift hands, but I notice that the ones who do experience tiredness. Funny, most of the time these few folks are unable to maintain the strenuous act of raising their arms for that long, therefore, the "act" is interrupted. [Just thought of something very funny -- can you imagine some of the European women who don't shave their armpits and wearing short-sleeve tops ... raising their arms?]

Anyway, speaking of standing all through the praising and clapping period, I really feel sorry for those with disabilities ... or even the strong -- they, too, get tired of standing for long minutes just because the leaders have it organized that way and them brainwashed that way.

Talking about organized religion. Good thing most of the congregations are not into this charismatic-led environment.

U.B.

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
70.156.25.18

"Making a mountain out of a molehill..."

July 29 2006, 2:34 AM 

Donnie,
You speak out of one side of your mouth that IM is wrong and that we are to sing acappella..

Then out of the other side of your mouth,you say that acappella is wrong because it is a performance...and is no better than IM..

Maybe a rule book from the bible might be helpful..Since acappella is authorized and IM is not...Do you have those rules for us to see...It seems all your talk is from your point of view..We need some HS instruction on corporate worship...If we can sing and make melody in our hearts to God,what are the restrictions according to the HS..?

You're making a mountain out of a molehill...Well,maybe a little smaller than a molehill..

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Bill Crump
(no login)
66.217.166.113

Performing

July 29 2006, 8:26 AM 

Whether a soloist, an ensemble group, or a full choir sings a cappella or with instruments, if they do so in a worship service while the rest of the congregation is silent and listening to them, then they are performing. Worship is not about performing. It's the natural tendency for audiences to focus on performers and their talents. When performers are made a part of worship services, audiences by nature focus on them rather than on God. Therefore, it is better to stick with simple, a cappella congregational singing, where no one person or group can possibly be made the center of attention.

 
 Respond to this message   
v-jo
(no login)
70.156.25.18

Making fun of a song with these words:"

July 29 2006, 2:38 AM 

There's something wrong with someone who makes fun of a song with these words:

You're my brother, you're my sister,
So take me by the hand
Together we will work until He comes

There's no foe that can defeat us
When we're walking side by side
As long as there is love, we will stand

***************

What part don't you like, UB, the brother/sister part, the working together part, the walking side by side part? Oh, wait, I know what part you don't like: "As long as there is love, we will stand."

That's why Madison is still standing. Kinda sticks in yore craw, don't it?

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Bill Crump
(no login)
66.217.166.113

Re: Making fun of a song with these words:"

July 29 2006, 8:51 AM 

After having read a number of posts that v-jo has made at FaithSite, I need to make a short observation. Her responses to conservative Christians are usually defensive and sarcastic, sometimes quite hostile. Studying her phraseology, I envision a person scowling and frowning, maybe even grinding her teeth, as she pounds out negative responses to anything the conservatives have to say. V-jo implies that Untruth Buster objects to lyrics that mention "love," yet I've never noticed any remote trace of "love" in any of her responses to the conservatives. That seems to be a common scenario: Detesting the biblical truths that the conservatives present, the liberals accuse them of not having "love," when in fact the liberals, by their hostile responses, are the ones failing in "love." That indeed is hypocrisy.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Max Moon
(no login)
67.177.83.89

Re: Making fun of a song with these words:"

July 29 2006, 4:32 PM 

Dr. Bill, one Dr. to another, you talking to V-jo about hypocrisy, is like the pot calling the kettle black.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Bill Crump
(no login)
66.217.125.131

"Pot Calls Kettle Black": A Dying Insult

July 29 2006, 5:59 PM 

Two spiritual mavericks, Max and v-jo, have both used the insult "pot calls kettle black." That's an old, well-worn, and used-up insult. Come, come, now, I expected more creativity. But I guess after a while, the insults dry up. You can only stomp, scream, and yell, "pot calls kettle black, pot calls kettle black, potcallskettleblack" so many times before it just fizzles out and loses its "zinger-ness." Whatever, vain attempts at insulting me over and over still don't diminish the fact that v-jo has accused the conservatives of lacking love because they preach hard biblical truth, yet she manifests nothing but hostility and anger toward them, the very thing of which she accuses the conservatives. That's called hypocrisy, and Max supports her for it. Quite predictable from two spiritual mavericks. And BTW, that's no attack, its just plain fact.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.204.4

When you continue to defend the divisive ... issues

July 29 2006, 5:32 PM 

Peck,

I think I have reached a point where it is pointless to explain anything anymore to you. I am just showing you what's happening out there in a FEW of the congregations that have succumbed to this Change Movement thingy -- how very destructive it is and how it is dividing the church needlessly. When you continue to defend the divisive CONTROVERSIAL and/or UNNECESSARY issues, you are not helping one bit. That's all I am trying to say.

I'm not even into discussing what is or what isn't sinful -- as you make it sound like. But the reality is that these issues are causing alienation among your brothers and sisters in Christ. If you don't ... and as long as you don't ... fully realize and recognize this fact, I have nothing else to say that will change your mind.

"Prevention is better than cure," as the saying goes.

 
 Respond to this message   
Amazed
(no login)
68.19.204.4

What's the church coming to? ... Instrumental music is God's plan....

July 29 2006, 5:36 PM 

UB-
Here's your sign... I mean quote:

"There's also a Contemporary, Charismatic "Christian Rock Music" HYMN titled "Clap Your Hands" [not kidding, BTW] that the leader and his Praise Team performs for the congregation. The Team and the willing participants thoroughly enjoy this "love feast" as they sing, "Clap your hands all ye people, shout to God with a voice of triump, clap your hands ... Alleluia, alleluia! Alleluia, alleluiah!"


I can not believe the heretics at Madison would sing this charismatic rock song. What is the church coming to ? It comes from of all places.... PSALM 47!!!!

That's in the Bible. Maybe you've heard of it. It's also commonly referred to as God's Word.


Instrumental music is God's plan. You better start using it!

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.204.4

Clapping ... and hissing and "multiplying words against God"

July 29 2006, 5:44 PM 

Amazed,

I wonder about that, too.

  • 2Kgs.11:[12] And he brought forth the king's son, and put the crown upon him, and gave him the testimony; and they made him king, and anointed him; and they clapped their hands, and said, God save the king.

  • Job.27:[23] Men shall clap their hands at him, and shall hiss him out of his place.

  • Job.34:[37] For he addeth rebellion unto his sin, he clappeth his hands among us, and multiplieth his words against God.

  • Pss.98:[8] Let the floods clap their hands: let the hills be joyful together

  • Isa.55:[12] For ye shall go out with joy, and be led forth with peace: the mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and all the trees of the field shall clap their hands.

  • Lam.2:[15] All that pass by clap their hands at thee; they hiss and wag their head at the daughter of Jerusalem, saying, Is this the city that men call The perfection of beauty, The joy of the whole earth?

  • Ezek.25:[6] For thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thou hast clapped thine hands, and stamped with the feet, and rejoiced in heart with all thy despite against the land of Israel;

  • Nah.3:[19] There is no healing of thy bruise; thy wound is grievous: all that hear the bruit of thee shall clap the hands over thee: for upon whom hath not thy wickedness passed continually?

U.B.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Max Moon
(no login)
67.177.83.89

Spiritual MAVERICK?

July 30 2006, 8:12 AM 

Dr. Bill Crump,

I am hardly a spiritual Maverick. I am not and have never been part of a Sign Out Front, Church of Christ.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.153.69.207

The old Vineyard, etal making God come, huh?

July 31 2006, 12:15 AM 

    You're my brother, you're my sister,
    So take me by the hand
    Together we will work until He comes

Hee Haw, a Fraudian Slip Showing! The goal of all MUSICAL religion was defined as SORCERY (Rev 18:22f). The goal, confirmed by The Vinyard Mother, was to reach a sexual-like or literal climax with the spirits. Among the voodoo people who fueled the Stoneite wing of the Restoration Movement, they knew that the spirits would not come without lots of emotion.

Just what KIND of work are you going to do while holding hands? Isn't work a legalistic thing? Music is the most legalistic, superstitious works-intensive rituals ever concocted to AID the gods to keep them from failing to come.

Defining the Abomination which makes DESOLATE (starved for the Word) in the Jerusalem temple and in the end-time church where the musicators CLAIM to bring you into contact with God, Dionysus the New Wineskin God depends on music to bring on a perverted, KNOWING relationship with one another CLAIMING that you were having sex with the "gods" meaning "demons." When God pours out the CUP OF HIS WRATH the word is ORGE or ORGY which is WHAT is happening at Madison and all churches where the musicators replace the preacher: gradually at first but TOTALLY in time. At Madison their stated goal was to turn the church into a THEATER FOR HOLY ENTERTAINMENT. The word is THEATRON meaning MAKING A SPECTACLE OF JESUS CHRIST who as SPIRIT cannot be made to COME.

"And Euripides does likewise, in his Bacchae, citing the Lydian usages at the same time with those of Phrygia, because of their similarity:

But ye who left Mt. Tmolus (Sardis was on this mt.), fortress of Lydia, revel-band of mine, women whom I brought from the land of barbarians as my assistants and travelling companions, uplift the tambourines native to Phrygian cities, inventions of mine and mother Rhea [ZOE].

And again, happy he who, blest man, initiated in the mystic rites, is pure in his life, . . . who, preserving the righteous ORGIES of the great mother Cybele, and brandishing the thyrsus on high, and wreathed with ivy, doth worship Dionysus.

Come, ye Bacchae, come, ye Bacchae, bringing down (double entendre) Bromius, (boisterous one) god the child of god, out of the Phrygian mountains into the broad highways of Greece.


And Rubel Shelly prays: "Come Holy Spirit, come, make us truly new creatures in Christ"

http://www.piney.com/RsHsJn16.html

 
 Respond to this message   
Amazed
(no login)
68.19.204.4

You call it a "Christian Rock Music" HYMN?

July 31 2006, 4:32 AM 

UBCruz-
What I love about you, is the fact that you are the only human (or troll) on the planet who can sit in an acapella worship service, and accuse them of singing rock music. It's funny. Not "funny", HA HA... "funny", Rain Man.

The best part is when you call it a "Christian Rock Music" HYMN.

Funny.


 
 Respond to this message   
ServantForHim
(no login)
68.19.204.4

Instead of causing dissension and downcasting...

July 31 2006, 4:39 AM 

U.B.:
You just seem very negative, to the point where you seem like you don't enjoy attending the church at Madison. If this is correct, then you should leave.
Your suggestion about the Christian church also applies to you. Since you know so much about singy clappy, contemporary Christian music then maybe that is the place for you. I like the church of Christ that I attend, unlike you where you have an aggressive attitude towards your leaders there at Madison. Again, instead of causing dissension and downcasting, perhaps you should find a more fundamental church that is more low key, and teach the doctrine that you prefer.
Being negative about the leadership and worship style where you currently attend is not spiritually healthy for you U.B. That kind of stress eats away at you physically also.


 
 Respond to this message   
Myth Buster
(no login)
68.19.204.4

"... your staying power at Madison"

July 31 2006, 4:42 AM 

UB,

I admire your staying power at Madison. "Life is a caberet, ol' chum. Life is a caberet!' LOL!


 
 Respond to this message   
Amazed
(no login)
68.19.204.4

Read some of his trash at CM

July 31 2006, 4:46 AM 

Myth Buster and Untruth Buster. Are y'all brothers?
Your parents had a thing about naming their kids variations of the word "Lie" didn't they?

Myth-
Read Acts. Tell me what is honrable about Donnie's "staying power" at Madison? After you read Acts, read some of his trash at CM. How long do you think that behavior would have been tolerated by the 1st century apostles and elders?

If he's not happy at Madison, and wants to sit there and be miserable, who cares?

If he wants to get on the internet and publicly humiliate and criticize his elders in the most unbiblical way possible, who cares?

When he starts getting obnoxious, is when he tells everyone to leave thier churches instead of causing trouble. Real admirable Myth.


 
 Respond to this message   
Myth Buster
(no login)
68.19.204.4

"I have been reading your [Amazed's] post"

July 31 2006, 4:49 AM 

amazed,

Yeah, I would like to consider UB a brother.

Second, you are no different from those you criticise. I know because I have been reading your post.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.204.4

Not interested in fighting the elders; it's the "Worship Leader" thingy

July 31 2006, 4:55 AM 

Amazed,

You might be interested in this bit of info. When I decided to begin posting, I thought Myth Buster was a cool nickname. Then, I made up my mind -- I substituted the word "untruth" for "myth" and have used "Untruth Buster" since. Cool stuff, eh?

I still feel that this brother in Christ is cool. In fact, I have re-posted one of his original messages from a few years back. Check out the thread "Myth Buster: 'Great Invitation'" that I posted yesterday (7/15/2006).

I'm not interested in fighting the elders; neither am I "not happy"; nor am I obnoxious -- just trying to point out that the "Worship Leader" thingy and the "Praise Team" created the unfortunate church havoc early in 2001. If and until you're capable of accepting that fact, there's nothing else I can explain to you (Amazed) and Servant, Walt, Brian and your other cohorts.

You're so focused on dissension and criticism on my part when the division in the church should be attributed to what occurred in 2001. I had/have nothing to do with the hundreds of members leaving. It appears now that I have a much better chance or success of explaining that to an elementary school kid.

With literal seed and YTBH speaking of pruning, that hardly signifies the mass exodus of alienated members due to the "Worship Leader" and "Praise Team" thingies. The truth of the matter is that these are the controversial and unnecessary divisive elements (Worship Leader and Praise Team) that need to be pruned badly.

Amazed, your untruth has been busted.

Untruth Buster

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.152.183.205

Young dogs turn old TRICKS?

July 31 2006, 9:03 AM 

Amazed, I am NOT surprised that anyone could get BURNED with a DEGREES. Servant, I am not 80 and the depression years were the best years of my life. How many GAMBLERS jumped off tall buildings? Psalm 47 points to the JUDAS PRINCIPLE. Judas was Judas Sicarri: he was an assassin. According to traditions he was a HASHISH MAN who would betray anyone for money. The Judas bag was for "carrying the mouth pieces of wind instruments." Drunk and always pictured as perverted flute players. When he found out that he had failed he did the ONLY honorable thing by hanging himself. I can tell you as a PROPHECY that when the musicating CHURCH STEALERS from widows wake up (too late) to the horrors of their failure WE will have us some mass "blood redemptions."

The history of the great REVIVALS resulted in many suicides. A speculator is stupid but not EVIL: the universal history of using MUSIC to CLAP hands to CAPTURE weak and effemate males is beyond any crime ever perpetuated on humanity. Satan's best WEAPONS are always YOUNG mind-damaged by sound bytes elders and false preachers.

I am amazed that people are old enough to claim to be disciples who can DISHONOR God and His Word and then just to HIT BACK to TRY to SILENCE any oppositon to what John and ALL musical words identify as SORCERY or WITCHCRAFT. You should be DISTINCTLY HONORED because we are told that for ONE WARLOCK there are 10,000 WITCHES to feed your face. I am telling you FLAT OUT that Satan has you by the tail and you CANNOT read a passage of Scripure in context without perverting it.

You have no reason to KNOW this but take it on faith: God turned Israel over to WORSHIP THE STARRY HOST so when you trust David you are involved with Saturn or Chaldee 666. He picked kings to CARRY OUT the captivity and death sentence finally imposed when the elders (wolves = perverts) fired God and demanded a DOMINANT PREACHER (king). He PROMISED them in Scripture--which you have no reason to have heard about--exactly what He was going to do and the Warrior Chariot Musicians was a CURSE. Sure, God loved David so instead of destroying the WHOLE NATION he quarantined DAVID at a pagan Jebusite High Place called Jerusalem and Sodom.

You could never have heard--and retained--the fact that the Levitical Warrior Musicians were under the KING and COMMANDERS OF THE ARMY. The civil-military-clergy sacrificial system had NOTHING to do with the people who SYNAGOGUED and any nit wit would have known NOT to blow the trumpet or sing when the WORD of God was being read or recited.

(To the chief Musician, A Psalm for the sons of Korah.)

O clap your hands, all ye people; shout unto God with the voice of triumph. Psa 47:1


Clapping IS an instrumental panic sound--the Startle Reflex USED by ABUSERS:
    Taqa (h8628) taw-kah'; a prim. root; to clatter, i. e. slap (the hands together), clang (an instrument); by anal. to drive (a nail or TENT-PEG, a dart, etc.); by impl. to become BONDSMAN (by hand-clasping): - blow ([a trumpet]), cast, clap, fasten, pitch [tent], smite, sound, strike, * suretiship, thrust.
When the musicator makes you MOVE TOGETHER (Hee Haw) he is BONDING you to himself and FORCING you to march LOCK STEP and GOOSE STEP -- I call it GOOSE CLAPPING . When the CHURCH IN THE WILDERNESS was called into assembly it was only for hearing instructions. Therefore, the ALARM or TRIUMPH OVER was outlawed: that outlaws hand clapping as if any nitwit would need a LAW forbidding it when Jesus meets as oue ONLY Master Teacher.
    Num 10:7 But when the congregation is to be gathered together, ye shall blow, but ye shall not sound an alarm.
This word has the same meaning as the HAND CLAPPING to make you "move together" (Hee Haw).
    H7321 rua roo-ah' A primitive root; to mar (especially by breaking); figuratively to split the ears (with sound), that is, shout (for alarm or joy): blow an alarm, cry (alarm, aloud, out), destroy, make a joyful noise, smart, shout (for joy), sound an alarm, triumph.
The CLAPP word is used to define how a woman BETRAYS and MURDERS a man she had given shelter too. No, dumbo, that is NOT an approved example just as the CLAPPING is not an approved example.
    And Ehud put forth his left hand, and took the DAGGAR from his right thigh, and THRUST it into his belly: Jud.3:21

    And Jael went out to meet Sisera, and said unto him, Turn in, my lord, turn in to me; fear not. And when he had turned in unto her into the tent, she covered him with a mantle. Jud.4:18

      And he said unto her, Give me, I pray thee, a little water to drink; for I am thirsty. And she opened a bottle of milk, and gave him drink, and covered him. Jud 4:19

    Again he said unto her, Stand in the door of the tent, and it shall be, when any man doth come and enquire of thee, and say, Is there any man here? that thou shalt say, No. Jud 4:20

      Then Jael Hebers wife took a nail of the tent, and took an hammer in her hand, and went softly unto him, and SMOTE the nail into his temples, and fastened it into the ground: for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died. Jud 4:21
I don't see how anyone could CLAIM or even want to be a disciple and try to SMASH the Words of Jesus Christ (Spirit and Life) by trying to belittle their betters.

You, dear CLAPPER, are a wife BETRAYING people and AFFLICTING them just as God prophesied of the SORCERS in Revelation 18. This is the SAME bad WALL STREET: when WE get the world wised up, YOU are going to discover that you have been STEALING from widows and doing the JUDAS ASSASIN or CLAPPING or THRUSTING a daggar into the belly of widows. Isn't it WONDERFUL that Satan made sure that you would never try that on REAL MALES or RATIONAL (Spiritual) women but pick on the WEAK. I think this may be God's final GENERIC ENGINEERING.

Don't kiss it off as the product of an OLD mind: older people learned things BEFORE your were born and stay WAY AHEAD of you on anything that has happened since. That is just PROOF that you are a changeling-lostling and in The Book of Enoch you are doing just what you are supposed to do knowing that you have fallen and will never get back up.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.52.253.237

Something stinks!!!!!!!

July 31 2006, 10:44 PM 

Why are several of the posts from the same IP? 70.156.25.18

===========================
What stinks? The IP address? or several of the posts?

Did you read the statement that explains the source of the "online" conversation?


    
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 72.150.118.182 on Aug 1, 2006 1:14 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Amazed
(no login)
72.150.118.182

The leaders made a lot of changes; it caused a lot of problems

August 1 2006, 7:45 AM 

Myth-
Nice dodge. Now, try answering what I asked you.

Untruth-
I don't doubt that when the leaders at Madison made changes it caused a lot of problems. I wasn't there, so I don't know, or care to know, the details. I don't know or care to know who was right or wrong.

What I am saying is this. The changes are made. It is a fully functioning church with elders. If they are wrong, they will answer to God and Him alone. YOUR choice is to follow them or leave. I honestly don't care either way.

What bothers me is your atrocious criticism here and CM of the church and it's leadership. Then, your continuous calls for people to leave their churches instead of causing trouble.

If you can not see the hypocrisy in that, we are done discussing it.


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
72.150.118.182

You have left the church and "joined" another

August 1 2006, 8:02 AM 

Amazed,

Nice try. I'm the one who is not deviating. Neither are many of the other members who are still there. What makes you think I am against several hundred members who have stayed? I [not you] DECIDE to stay or leave according to my own volition.

In your case, you are the deviant, the non-conformist, the defiant one ... to the point that you have left the church and joined another. So, what business do you have in the church you left????????? In fact, why did you leave the church? You left ... and I have no intention to do the same as you did. Gotcha!

Trust me, just because there is such a thing as the "loud minority" group that you have aligned with comfortably doesn't mean that the "silent majority" is going to go along with you and your deviance.

You have left the church. It's really time that you leave it alone for good.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
ServantForHim
(no login)
72.150.118.182

"Why do you criticize the worship leader and the worship service?"

August 1 2006, 8:04 AM 

U.B.:
You say..."I'm not interested in fighting the elders; neither am I "not happy"; nor am I obnoxious -- just trying to point out that the "Worship Leader" thingy and the "Praise Team" created the unfortunate church havoc early in 2001."

You're not interested in fighting the elders? You might not be, but you don't mind humilitating them here on this public forum time and time again. You say that you are "not happy?" Why do you then criticize the worship leader and the worship service? The singing is a huge part of the worship service. If the worship service doesn't isn't something that spiritually uplifts you, the why are you there? What purpose does going the church service do you at all? Go to someplace where you actually care to be. If this isn't obnoxious on your part U.B., then what do you call it? Constructive criticism??? No U.B., it is not!

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
72.150.118.182

"Madison is in the buisness of boosting people like myself..."

August 1 2006, 8:06 AM 

Untruth Buster,
You are not facing reality..The reality is that all large congregations have a variety of thinkers..We blend but never fully agree on all the happenings that go on within the fellowship..It's called being a normal church..

You,on the other hand, have made something normal into something exceptional..Worship style has no power to add or subtract from the grace of God..When Jesus sits in your assembly,he sees a Donnie that he loves..He understands human nature..I have no right to speak for Madison but in my heart I believe that if you responded as so many people do in the service..that they would gather around you as they do everyone else and hold your hand and pray with you....They are your family and I gaurantee that your worship leader would welcome you into his home and treat you as if you had never said a word about him...You are in a good place...I wish I had your faith..I have as much religion as you or SE ...but my faith needs a boost and Madison is in the buisness of boosting people like myself...

Stir up love among the brethren not division...Our congregation has an outstanding worship leader who is paid..Do you think every body is happy..I hardly think so..and some of the elders decisions are leading us into a different world than what we are used to in the CoC...Do you think every one is happy? I hardly think so...But,we accept our elder's decisions and respect each other as christians and continue as one..some leave..but only in peace...It's normal Donnie..You are making something normal into an exception...If the people on this board could witness your contemporary service..Some would not see it any different from a traditional service..

However,our heritage as CoC is understandable and your reasoning is understandable..It's just that change is happening in the CoC and we have a problem adjusting to it..Have a great day ....

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
Myth Buster
(no login)
72.150.118.182

"Amazed ... [you] display the attitude you accuse those of having"

August 1 2006, 8:09 AM 

Madison being a large church does have a variety of thinkers as Peck mentioned.

The 7 churches of Asia had a variety of thinkers as well, i.e. Nicolatians. In none of these letters were any members exhorted to leave. Not because of lack of modern innovation either. Persecution from outside the Jeruselem church blows that theory out of the water.

Amazed, if you are wondering why I don't bother with your questions it is because your original questions are 'digs' and not real questions. This simply reinforces the fact that you very much display the attitude you accuse those of having. If you don't see your hypocracy then I really am done with you as far as having a meaningful discussion.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
72.150.118.182

The havoc in 2001

August 1 2006, 8:14 AM 

Peck,

I do not like saying this -- but you need to really stop your silly defense of your son-in-law, Keith Lancaster, Madison's self-designated "Worship Leader" who, along with his "Praise Team," caused the havoc in 2001. Why can you not see this?

I have nothing to do with the COLOSSAL mess he did when he had the nerve to intrude and interfere with the assembly of Christians meeting at 10:30 AM by bringing in his choir performing with their very loud microphones. I myself almost jumped out of my seat! "What in the world is that?" Surprisingly, to my knowledge, none of the very senior saints had a heart attack.

It has not been the same since ... as attendance has dwindled to half the size.

And you accuse me of being the troublemaker? It is your son-in-law and his musicians!!!!!!

It's also time you stop making excuses such as ... that it was a fire hazard for the newly created third group to continue meeting in the basement. In case you didn't know this, Peck, the one who screamed "Fire!!!" happened to be the Chief of the Metro Fire Dept.

The newly formed "charismatic" third group did not have to interfere with the assembly at 10:30 {which had been there for ages). That group could have set another time or schedule to meet.

You know the common defense mechanism of the change advocates? It is this: "If you don't like the change, it's your fault ... it's your problem ... you do not have love.

That's what you KEEP telling me, Peck.

Hey, deal with the source of the problem.

Untruth Buster

P.S.: Don't forget [IOW, REMEMBER] that there are still HUNDREDS in the fellowship who do not support your son-in-law and his performers. If you think the gathering is about MUSICAL WORSHIP which comprises 70% of the entire period [that's 60 of 90 minutes], I honestly think your concept of the purpose of the assembly is misdirected. Let’s see: At one gathering your son-in-law directed his Praise Team to some 18 musical pieces. And many of these were either 7-11 singy-clappy rah-rah-rahs or songs written by “Christian Hot Rock” artists.

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.19.253.202

"My goodness, Keith needs no one to defend him."

August 2 2006, 4:42 AM 

Donnie,
I do not come in defense of anyone at Madison..I merely wish to express the truth about what has happened and what is happening now according to what I witness...My goodness,Keith needs no one to defend him..A man who has followed his calling by God,while people as yourself have rediculed him in the brotherhood for 20 years...I back him not defend him..of course not all love his ministry..It's normal in a large church..Any youth minister,worship leader,elder or even some of the women who oversee certain activities knows that..It's a price they pay for being leaders..

You make it appear that the elders are not in charge ...

It's obvious that you never attended the basement services..you missed a lot..The crowds were so large that when adults came in,the young people would let them have their seats and they would stand along the walls and even sit in the floors..little small children were so enthused about the service that their little faces were full of joy and they participated in the service...The lessons were extremely well taught..but any adult in the audience could see that a large crowd like that was a safety issue...My town would not approve of it..It was dangerous as a fire hazard..

Donnie,If anything That I have described in my posts have not been true please have someone to correct me...I speak the truth of what I witnessed..It's not a defense but accurate information..I saw it with my own eyes..but they are old eyes..If I'm wrong..correct me

It's not my place to speak for that great congregation...I may be out of turn by doing so..In fact,I may be doing more harm than good by talking with you..I'm a free man,and speak my mind...I like you..but can't understand your brain...

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.152.159.175

The PERVERTED model Paul warned against.

August 1 2006, 12:32 PM 

John Calvin informs us that "there is no statute of limitations on Heresy." Nor, do the elders have ANY command authority and they are--if APT--to be the ONLY pastor-teachers of the EKKLESIA or school of the Bible. In NUMEROUS Biblical and historical churches that meant to READ and DIALOG a portion of Scripture each week. The goal of TEACHING the Biblical text only was to LEARN something and not feel like you have been to the local topless bar with MALES performing the roles UNIQUELY reserved in cities like Corinth for prostitutes or perverted males. Their DIRECT COMMAND is to "teach that which has been taught." They have no authority to add:

The ACT of preaching: that heresy didn't arrive for hundreds of years
The ACT of singing: that heresy arrived about 400 years too late"
The ACT of "laying by in store." THAT IS A RECENT LAW.

Jesus died to OUTLAW those adding spiritual anxiety like DEBT and mind-altering, sexual-stimulating RITUALS specificially outlawed by the word REST.

Beyond that, the elders and the AUDIENCE are partners and NO one should be THREATENED PSYCHOLOGICALLY by saying they should LEAVE. The TROUBLE MAKERS should leave. COVERING UP a sin is just as vile as COMMITTING the sin of turning "school of the Bible" into a CRACK HOUSE where the CRACK is "endorphins" induced by the AROUSAL displays.

Elders are normally BUDDY SELECTED and if they have no sense of morality or KNOWLEDGE of the meaning of APT TO TEACH then they have NO SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY. OBEY means to "listen to and heed what they TEACH (defined as INSPIRED TEXT) and to "watch the outcome of their lives."

From Iamblicus defining the EGYPTIAN rituals enacted by Israel when the ROSE UP TO PLAY. For that God abandoned them to this IDOLATRY and what you see under the KINGS in defined below. Why would ELDERS (unless WOLVES) turn the church over to what Paul warned AGAINST. TIME does not make a CRIME into WORSHIP.

"In addition to these things you remark as follows: "So also certain others of these ecstatic become entheast or inspired when they hear cymbals, drums, or some choral chant, 21 as, for example, those who are engaged in the Korybantic Rites, 22 those who are possessed at the Sabazian festival and those who are celebrating the Rites of the Divine Mother." [ZOE] 23 [Sabazianism was the worship of the STARRY HOST to which God abandoned the Isralites]
    Note 21. Some exhibition of this kind is described by the Apostle Paul in the first Epistle to the Corinthians. "If," says he, "the whole assembly come together to the same place and all prattle in tongues, and common men should come in, or unbelievers, will they not say that you are raving?" [Paul equated that to MUSIC]

    Hence he counsels that only two or three should speak in turn, and one interpret; but if nobody present is capable of this, they should keep silence, and speak only to themselves and to God:

      "for not of tumult is he a god, but of tranquility." (Ovid; Fasti IV,

      "The attendants beat the brass, and the hoarse-sounding hides. Cymbals they strike in place of helmets, tambourines for the shields; the pipe yielded its Phrygian notes.")

There is evidently a deeper meaning in all this than is commonly apprehended.
    Note 22. The Korybantes are variously described. Their cult was identified or closely allied to that of the Kabeirian [homosexual] divinities, and that of the Great Mother.[ZOE] It was celebrated in the islands of the Aegean Sea and in Phygia. Music, dancing, processions, and ecstatic frenzy were characteristics.

    Note 23 Sabazios, Sabaoth, or Sabbat, the god of the Planet Saturn [Chaldeee 666], was better known as Bacchus or Dionysos, and was also styled in Semitic countries, Iao or Yava. His worship was more or less associated and identified with that of the Great Mother, under various designations, and it was characterized by phallephoric [carrying the penis like MICROPHONES] processions, dances, mourning for the slain divinity, and the Watch Night. It came from Assyria as its peculiar symbols, the ivy or kissos, the spotted robe or Nimr [Nimrod], and the Thyrso, indicate.

    The name Zagreus the Kissos and nimr remind us of Kissaia or Asiatic Ethiopia, and the Zagros mountains occupied by the Nimr. Assyria was called "the land of Nimrod." -Amos VIII.

    IVY is the mark of the TRINITY.

    http://www.piney.com/His223.html
It is proper, accordingly, to tell the causes of these things, how they came into existence, and what explanation there is for the performing of the Rites.

These allusions which you make, namely, that the music at these festivals is exciting and passionate; [OUTLAWED BY PAUL]
    that the sound of the flutes [vocal bands] CAUSES or heals conditions of aberration; A
    that the music changes the temperaments or dispositions of the body;

    that by some of the choral songs the Bacchic frenzy is excited,
    but by others the Bacchic orgies are made to cease;
26. With the Korghantians, this represented a guard about the Demiurgos or Creator; with the Kuretes, it denoted a protecting of the divine maid Kora.
    Note; 26. Servius remarks that the Sacred observances of Father Liber, the Roman Bacchus, related to the purification of souls. This cleansing, as here declared, was considered to be [Original Sin] not only from contamination acquired by coming into the conditions of physical existence, but also from guilt actually incurred.
Thou seemest to think that those who are enrapt by the Mother of the gods are males, for thou callest them, accordingly, "Metrizontes";
    yet that is not true, for the "Metrizontesæ" are chiefly women.
    A very FEW, however, are MALES, and such as may be more DELICATE. [Malakos meaning SOFT: the Catamites] [Paul warned that OUTSIDE the spirit THERE BE DOGS]

    This enthusiasm has a power that is both life-engendering and perfective, in which respect it differs from every other form of frenzy.

    Proceeding thus, after this way, into what remains of the present discussion, and distinguishing particularly the inspirations of the Nymphs or of Pan,
The word ORGE is PROOF that God is pouring out His WRATH where the MARKS are the singers and musicians UNDER the Mother Whore and John called them SORCERERS.

You don't GET PREFERENCES in the ASSEMBLY: Paul excluded those in Romans 14 so you could focus on the WORD in the ekklesia while OUTLAWING the SELF PLEASURING connected to the creation of MENTAL EXCITEMENT.

CULTURE never gives one permission to HURT OTHERS to turn church into an EFFEMINATE and EFFEMINIZING entertainment center.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.152.81.143

No AUTHORITY "beyond the WORD of God."

August 1 2006, 11:42 PM 

The elder was in the FRONT LINE leading the troups into battle. Or they were on the front line fighting of the WOLVES (perverts) wanting to eat up the lambs. They have NO command authority because Jesus was SHEPHERD and not demagogue.

Their authority DEMANDS that they "call the assembly and keep order." When the assembly dismisses they have NO authority to hire STAND OVERS as insincere preachers or musicians which are defined by the same word as PROSTITUTES: selling the Free Word at retail or selling THEIR OWN compositions and THIS defines the Scribe, Pharisee and HYPOCRITE (performer)
    "We have frequently used the term 'officers' with reference to the servants of the church. We have frequently affirmed that in the ordinary use of that term an 'officer' is unknown to the Christian scriptures...An officer in the ordinary acceptation of the term is one who is appointed to do a work, which he could NOT do without that appointment and to which, without the official investiture, would be a crime...can an overseer consecrated as as he may be...do anything as such that every Christian is not at liberty, and even is duty bound to do to the best of his ability" (David Lipscomb, The Gospel Advocate, 1867, p. 567)

    "Controlling the church by virtue of authority of office is unknown in the Scriptures. All should seek to control simply and only through the authority of truth, impressed by lives of godliness, purity and love." (Lipscomb in The Gospel Advocate, 1871)

    "Hence elders and deacons, whatever may be meant by these words, can do nothing by what is called official authority into whch they are to be installed by something called ordination. Whatever is done by them must be done by the WORD of God, and not by any official authority to them." (Gospel Advocate, 1898, p. 280).

    "No man, therefore, has any arbitrary or official authority in the church of God...The word of God, not their personal decisions by their own wisdom, must be the rule, the law, in all things pertaining to the service of God." (E.G. Sewell, GA, 1897, p. 292)

The LIVING WORD cast out the Musical Minstrels LIKE DUNG. The written Word ALWAYS connects Music to children (female only please), to Satan, to warriors, to sacrificial exorcists, to prostitutes and Sodomites.

Here is how you preach in the synagogue
    For Moses of old time hath in every city them
    that preach him,
    being read in the synagogues every sabbath day. Ac.15:21

That is what Paul commanded Timothy and there is NEVER any singing in the SYNAGOGUE of Paul on mission or by Timothy: they would CAST HIM OUT as a pervert.
    Till I come, give attendance to (public) reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. 1 Tim 4:13
Here is how the Elders Rule
    Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine. 1 Tim 5:17
The ELDER is due an HONORARIUM or voluntary gifts IF he is already "laboring to the point of exhaustion in preaching and teaching." (Word and Doctrine.)

That is the PATTERN established by Jesus, commanded by Paul and practiced by ALL faithful churches.

Madison is NOT an ekklesia and it HAS NO QUALIFIED ELDERS or they would not have USURPED authority in the same way WOMEN were forbidden: that is AUTHENTIA which is both EROTIC and MURDEROUS.

Eat, drink and make Mary, but you ARE NOT REMOTELY a kissing cousin to a faithful church and the elders are WOLVES.

 
 Respond to this message   
literal seed
(no login)
68.19.253.202

"... hindsight is 20/20, and it could have been done better"

August 3 2006, 3:13 AM 

peck and donnie,

just to clarify some things that have been disputed here...not that it matters.

i attended the 10:30 services in both places during the last month before the move. the numbers continued to dwindle in the main worship area. it may have been down to around 400 total. the last week i attended in the fellowship hall, we sat in the overflow room that is used for dinners and special events when only 50 or so are in attendance. there must have been 100+ just in that room, full hallway in both directions coming off the fellowship hall and a full fellowship hall. i'd guess better than 700 in attendance. common sense would dictate that a move was in order. hindsight is 20/20, and it could have been done better. there are none that disagree with that. one of our elders, both then and now, held the position of fire chief prior to that occurrence. based on his experience, i would trust his opinion in matters such as that. the evolution of the contemporary service has been met with mixed responses. some chose to leave immediately, as donnie has reported. some chose to change to the traditional service. some have come and gone since then. to those that remain or now attend at madison it's no longer a big issue...except for donnie. he has joined the campaign to warn the brethren elsewhere of such dangerous events. let freedom ring! shout it from the rooftops! i still don't understand why he continues to attend assemblies that he knows will not be pleasing to him or to God(in donnie's opinion). if i felt like he does, i'd seek other fellowship.

bap,
ls

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.19.253.202

"... as long as the concerned members continue..."

August 3 2006, 3:16 AM 

Thanks Chuck...I feel out of place speaking for Madison...I probably need to vacate this board as long as the concerned members continue...

Did you pick up on the way that the little children acted so happy during the basement assembly..I believe if Donnie could have witnessed the worship service there,his attitude would be different..He has a good soul..

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
v-jo
(no login)
68.19.253.202

"Keith was not ever a 'self-appointed worship leader'"

August 3 2006, 3:21 AM 

"I do not like saying this -- but you need to really stop your silly defense of your son-in-law, Keith Lancaster, Madison's self-designated "Worship Leader" who, along with his "Praise Team," caused the havoc in 2001."


Donnie, why do you repeatedly lie about this? Keith was not ever a "self-appointed worship leader". Not only is it a lie, it would never have been allowed to happen if he or anyone else had tried to be self-appointed about anything. But he didn't.

So, again I ask, why do you continue to repeatedly tell this lie? There is no way around it, Donnie. It is a flat-out lie.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.253.202

"There are many talented men at Madison who can do..."

August 3 2006, 3:25 AM 

v-jo,

If you're speaking of a professional job in a religious setting, you would be correct. There are many talented men at Madison who can do "the service for the Master" free-of-charge. This "God's servant" has his own musical "a cappella" organization in the name of "religious" [OK, OK, OK--it's a religious business], but yet is being paid big buck$ to wag his arms and have his Praise Team sing to and for the congregation. The big buck$ are mis-spent. The funds could be used for more evangelism and benevolence.

If you're speaking of his arrogance, yes, he is a self-designated "Musical Worship Leader" who SINCERELY believes that he is leading congregants into God's holy presence.

U.B.


 
 Respond to this message   
v-jo
(no login)
68.19.253.202

"He's being paid so that he can focus..."

August 3 2006, 3:29 AM 

Sorry, Donnie, "arrogant" is not a word I would use to describe Keith.

Keith has been gifted by God, and he uses that gift for God's glory. He's being paid so that he can focus time and energy on his ministry. Sorry, but I don't think his bucks are out of line for a large congregation in a large city with multiple full-time paid staff.

I've seen plenty of worship/song leaders in my lifetime. Keith is one of the best. Maybe even THE best.


May I remind you of these thoughts:

Eph 4:31 - Get rid of all bitterness, rage, anger, harsh words, and slander, as well as all types of malicious behavior. 32 Instead, be kind to each other, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, just as God through Christ has forgiven you.

************

Have you forgotten that he is your brother?


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.253.202

"There are many folks ... who can do the wagging of arms for free. "

August 3 2006, 3:35 AM 

v-jo,

I'd probably give Keith a higher rating for his musical talent than you would. The problem with your analogy is that you're confusing a natural gift which Keith has with a spiritual gift. Music is not one of the spiritual gifts.

You're also confused about the man-made professional job of "Worship Leader" whose human job description is to lead "God's children" into their heavenly Father's holy presence. As it turns out, the "Worship Leader" and the choir (Praise Team) are performers. Congregational singing has survived for so long and is better WITHOUT them. (And don't equate the "Worship Leader" and his co-performers with someone who just leads or starts a song.

No, there is such a word as "arrogant." It is defined by his behavior on stage.

No, you did not get my point about the big buck$. The saints' collection is not designed to pay for a man-made professional job in the church. There are the needy saints and the poor out there. His $alary can support SEVERAL evangelists in third world countries.

Besides, I seriously doubt that God has placed MUSIC at the top of the priority list in regard to the Christian's eternal destiny -- if at all.

The size of the congregation has nothing to do with the musical performance issue. As I said, there are many folks in large congregations who can do the wagging of arms for free. That ... I might call real service for the Master.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
Peck123
(Login Peck123)
209.240.206.211

my name on this thread and what is said is without my permission..

August 3 2006, 9:22 AM 

Hi everyone,
Just a one time post to let you all know that I have no respect for this website..I believe it to be an embarressment to the body of Christ..so,I don't post here..

However,I do respect Donnie and Ken and Dr and Jimmy..They are my dear brothers and as much as I need grace..I give them mine as best I can...

It's not my place to speak for Madison since I live 3 hours away..But during the split,I was in Nashville on Sundays(I forget now why)..and I witnessed with my own eyes the transformation...

This topic was preceded by what I determined as slander on the elders and worship leader in a different website(so I confronted him) and Donnie had the poor taste of putting it over here without permission..Sure,it's legal but bad manners in my opinion..

It seems that Ken can say anything about authority and get away with it here...I'm old and still have it in my head to honor and respect eldership wherever it is...but it's not my place to control Donnie's actions..Only as a fellow christian do I plead with him to stop this agenda against the body of Christ..It's ugly..Mutual respect and tolerance should reign..not this website...

Worship style is a choice and each of us can select our place and time to worship...

Blessings to each of you...Peck

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
72.154.245.53

But this website is FOR [not against] “the body of Christ.”

August 5 2006, 12:50 AM 

Peck123,

I think you should personally thank this site for posting several of your posts. I gather that you would want the online audience to read your messages, would you not? You see, too, that there are others whose messages have been posted. And they have no objection to posting without permission, do they? In fact, I think, they like the idea. (So, I think we now have the permission issue solved.)

Guess what? Interestingly, and out of curiosity, I decided to count the number of times the word “elder” or “elders” or “eldership” has been mentioned in the discussion so far, i.e., in relation to your reference to “slander on the elders.” Literal has mentioned it 2 times, Amazed 3 times, and Peck123 14 times. See your constant accusation that I slander the elders? What is your agendum?

By the way, Peck, there’s so much more to worship than just the “style” controversy or the “choice of worship style.” If you think of style as being the order of the “acts” or the number of songs, that’s not even an issue. If performance is associated with style, then, that is an issue. If 75% of the assembly period is dedicated to musical worship and 25% to the Lord’s Supper and to the teaching and learning of God’s truth, then that would be quite an issue. Furthermore, if the overdose of musical worship includes songs that teach untruths, then that would also be quite an issue.

Now that you have actually posted, we’ll just have to let our readers decide. Meanwhile, I shall continue to post more messages from both sides and let the reader decide.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
v-jo
(no login)
70.156.25.146

Your slander of Lancaster is on the web for the entire world to see.

August 5 2006, 5:27 PM 

Donnie - Whatever, Donnie. Knock yourself out. Your slander of Lancaster is on the web for the entire world to see.

Go back and read 1 Cor. 6:10 again. While you've got your Bible out, read the book of James. It seems you missed that one.

And 1 Cor 11. How can you share at Jesus' Table every Sunday morning with Keith while carrying this blatant hatred in your heart? "Whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and the blood of the Lord." And from Jesus: "...leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother..."

Time is running out.


 
 Respond to this message   
YTBH
(no login)
70.156.25.146

"... A colossal salary? Are you privy to the church checkbook?"

August 5 2006, 5:31 PM 

Just a few observations sprinkled with some facts.

1. I have never heard Keith or anyone make the statement that he was "leading you into the presence of God." If anything is "announced," it is something like, "Let's worship God together."

2. What special knowledge do you have, Donnie, that Keith makes a colossal salary? Are you privy to the church checkbook?

3. Though one of Madison's members was fire marshal at the time of the wonderful worship in the basement, it was a disgruntled and bitter woman who kept making calls to the fire department those last few weeks to complain about a service she didn't even attend. She made the calls from the main telephone at the welcome center. She is the same woman who would show up prior to services afterwards to copy down all the attendance numbers so she could then leave and drive to her "new" church to report with glee when numbers dropped. This is a factual statement from a personal observation. Poor woman needs to get a life. Many of her own 1st degree relatives are still at Madison and pray for her.

I could go on and on but you get the picture. The ones I know personally who left (and there are many) would complain if Jesus himself gave the sermon... they wouldn't like his attire, etc. I hope that they are happy and truly hope they are working for the Lord elsewhere but I don't miss them!

YTBH

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
70.156.25.146

Job Description: "Worship Leader"

August 5 2006, 5:37 PM 

v-jo,

Keep on skipping significant points. The BIG buck$$$$ -- the saints' collection could be much better used in evangelism and benevolence. If he is not profiting from his own business in the name of religion, $$$ from his seminars, musical engagements, etc., I can somewhat see his reason for another professional job in a religious setting. Still, though, his arm-wagging exercise a few hours a week is over-compensated. As I have already mentioned, there are many talented men who can voluntarily help lead singing [and alternating or rotating their schedule would be good] ... so that the church will not be burdened with having to employ a concert director for huge $um$ of dollar$.

Go search online. Some of the job descriptions: “worship leaders have some special access into God’s presence that the congregation doesn’t have” [WOW!] …

“An effective corporate worship leader, aided and led by the Holy Spirit, skillfully combines biblical truth with music to magnify the worth of God and the redemptive work of Jesus Christ, thereby motivating the gathered church to join him in proclaiming and cherishing the truth about God and seeking to live all of life for the glory of God.” Hmmm! What about this in comparison: “And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers…” [Eph. 4:11]

… and “worship leaders” [Eph. 4:11b, KLV]

What about someone saying: “As I studied Scripture and read books like Engaging with God by David Peterson and Adoration and Action, ed. by D. A. Carson, I quickly realized that the Bible, especially the New Testament, didn’t give much space to my role as a worship leader. None, to be exact. The more I read, the more I felt I was reading myself out of a job.

There are more descriptions out there.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
v-jo
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"The amount isn't that significant. He's a paid minister."

August 6 2006, 10:16 PM 

Donnie - The money is not significant. The amount isn't that significant. He's a paid minister. Get over it.

What about the part that he's your brother? YOU keep forgetting that part. You talk about him with jealousy, bitterness, anger and hatred in your heart. You slander him openly on internet forums. This is so wrong, Donnie. Scripturally wrong.

You can't expect him to be better than you, and until you start treating him like your brother, you don't have any right to, either.

It's embarassing and shameful how you speak publicly about Christ-siblings. Embarassing for you, your family, your church family, and all those with him you share the SOF, "Church of Christ".

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.221.28

Feel bad for one ... but not for the hundreds that fled?

August 6 2006, 10:18 PM 

v-jo,

Look at the exodus en masse. Caused by one man and his musicians. It's what he did. (You know, when Nick Boone was dismissed as a song leader and the elders were looking for a replacement ... guess what? I inwardly voted for this brother to be the one to lead singing.) But since the takeover of the second assembly, nothing has been the same. He is still the problem ... like or not.

I see. You feel bad for one Christ-sibling, but not for the hundreds that fled. Yeah ... right!

Donnie


 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"You slander a celestial being ... you slander God...."

August 6 2006, 10:26 PM 

Donnie,
You're thinking as the world thinks...not as one who belongs to a body of Christ...

When you slander your elders and church leaders..You slander a celestial being..God has given them authority to do their job...You slander God when you publicly trash your own leadership...

It's normal for us all to have feelings of keeping our CoC heritage in check...Men from all times have fought for our heritage to remain as it is..Some big time CoC preacher whom I cannot recall the name,left the mission field some years ago, to come back to the US,so he could straighten out the brethren..It has always been somebodies buisness to keep the CoC heritage in check..

Tell me..Where has God set you in the worship assembly? Have you participated in the service...so..that someone could judge your actions..Leaders have a God given duty to give their talents to the Lord..

Donnie,think about repenting for your slander and let your heart join your family that cares for you...What are your feelings about how the congregation comes to the front with those who have responded..and they kneel and pray with them..and encourage them in whatever need they have..It brings tears to my eyes to see the compassion of those who attends Madison....You are loved by those who serve that congregation...We all fall short when it comes to behaviour..You're just normal..Worship style doesn't provide any righteousness to us and it doesn't take it away either....Trying to keep corporate worship pure is a problem because the guidelines are not given to us in a rulebook..Elders have it tough...

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
CVNurse
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"I guarantee you Keith does not have the intentions..."

August 6 2006, 10:28 PM 

Donnie,

I was at Madison for all the history you've brought up. I have also had in-depth conversations with Keith regarding this subject...

You said: you said: "Go search online. Some of the job descriptions: “worship leaders have some special access into God’s presence that the congregation doesn’t have” [WOW!] …"

I guarantee you Keith does not have the intentions you say he does...I can almost guarantee you've not spoken to him privately about this (like you know you should) while you prefer to slander him for all the world to see.

Please wake up!

CV

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.221.28

"... but hundreds of the members did not agree [as well]..."

August 6 2006, 10:31 PM 

peck,

I am sure that your son-in-law is a celestial being to you. It is a perfect description of the new office of "Worship Leader" -- some intercessor who leads the congregants into God's holy presence.

Just because I [along with hundreds of the members] did not agree with the leadership's colossal mistake in 2001 ... is that what you call slander?

If there's someone who needs to repent for damaging the church, it's your celestial son-in-law. If it weren't for him and his Praise Team, the congregation would still be intact today. He needs to stop fooling himself as if he is the victim and the innocent one.

Participated in the "service"? No, Peck, not under his leading me to God's holy presence. And you're right about no rulebook about worship. But you're not right about giving yourself [the "Worship Leader"] the license to fabricate one. Proof -- it's difficult to find the word "worship" in the book of Acts [history of the early church] and in all the epistles to the early churches. Much less "musical worship" or "worship concert."

No, I think you should pray for Keith. He needs it just like everyone else does and he STILL needs God to LEAD him before he can lead others. Don't you worry about me. My task is to warn other congregations that while some changes are good, it's just not worth the unity and growth of the church by implementing CONTROVERSIAL and UNNECESSARY CHANGES that cause alienation and division and strife.

I mean all that very sincerely,

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
BrianRasmussen
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"I get it. ... so they must have dirty minds."

August 6 2006, 10:36 PM 

Keep on skipping significant points. The BIG buck$$$$ -- the saints' collection could be much better used in evangelism and benevolence.

I get it. If someone is doing something that I don't agree with, they must have sinister motives for doing it. Like greed or spiritual pride or lust. They don't agree with me, so they must have dirty minds.


 
 Respond to this message   
Jimmy Wren
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"But paying some one to sing??? God help us!"

August 6 2006, 10:39 PM 

Brian, when I took my first full time preaching position I was contacted at least once every 2 or 3 months by someone who wanted to come and sing to our congregation.

It would always be a different person or group. They would usually tell me that if we could not afford to pay them they would be glad to pass the plate and take what ever was offered.

I say this because I know first hand that there are some people out there who are looking for an audience to perform for and they expect to get paid for doing it.

My question is why? We don't pay anyone to pray for us, do we? We don't pay anyone to serve the Lord's Supper for us, do we? We don't pay anyone to pass the offering baskets for us, do we? Why should we have to pay someone to sing for us??? We did not pay them years ago. Why now is a congregation burdened with having to pay and support someone to sing at us?

Singing is part of worship, why should a congregation pay a person to worship?

It is true that we support a minister to preach the word. Preaching is the most important thing a man can do and it is great when a congregation takes the burden of having to make a living from the preacher's shoulder so he can devote his full attention to it.

But paying some one to sing??? God help us!

In Christ,
Jimmy

 
 Respond to this message   
BrianRasmussen
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"There are some people that preach just for the money, too."

August 7 2006, 4:09 AM 

Jimmy,

There are some people that preach just for the money, too. They take their money from the offering. Why should we pay them?


 
 Respond to this message   
Dr. Bill Crump
(no login)
66.19.68.204

Re: "There are some people that preach just for the money, too."

August 8 2006, 9:58 AM 

Isn't it about time for Brian to perseverate with "Psalm 150"?

 
 Respond to this message   
Jimmy Wren
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"Wedding singer, okay but church singer, nokay."

August 7 2006, 4:12 AM 

Brian, You are probably right about that. I wish it was not so.

The worst thing about the paid "church singer" is they come to believe that they are "worship leaders."

I cannot find a reason to have a hired "church singer." Wedding singer, okay but church singer, nokay.

Brian, if you know a little about the Church of Christ you know that our little ones grow up singing. My little 6 year old grandson can out sing me. In the services there is no noise that covers the sound of our voices. Many of these young children and our teens have good voices. Often a teen may get to lead singing durning the Wednesday or Sunday pm service.

What I am trying to say Brian is that there are men, in the Churches of Christ, who love to lead the singing without charge. They just want to be a part of the worship. I believe that it is a bad practise for a congregation to let only 1 or 2 chosen men lead the singing, paid or not? Any man, who wants to lead the singing, should be used in a rotation, and they are here where I worship. And none of them is paid to do it.

Now I am not saying that makes us any better than anyone else but it does give opportunity for more men to be involved and no one is being "paid to worship."

In christ,
Jimmy

 
 Respond to this message   
loveB
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"They are called SHEPHERDS and not goat tenders... Celestial beings?"

August 7 2006, 4:16 AM 

Peck says: slandering celestial being..God has given them authority to do their job...You slander God when you publicly trash your own leadership...

Oh Peck! Son in laws are dispensible you know. I remember an email that to question elders is to slander celestial beings. Now, that fits with the STANDING ORDERS for hiring teams to lead us into the presence of God. That has been a WIDE SPREAD thesis and now the HIRERS are celestial beings. I don't know a musician who does not believe that they are INSPIRED. However, ALL of the Bible and outside evidence calls that PROPHESYING. Jesus will not know the names of those who traffic on LORD LORD SAYING.

The example of Jesus the apostles and the DIRECT COMMAND for elders is that must first be laboring to the point of exhaustion in preaching and teaching. They are called SHEPHERDS and not goat tenders. They are ELDERS by virtue of THEIR OWN HOLY SPIRIT and not because crony selection and "ordination" BESTOWS spiritual power on them. Paul said that the must "teach that which has been taught and refute those who oppose it." That is the LIMIT of their "authority." People obey by listening to their BIBLICAL teaching and by "watching the outcome of their lives." There is NO command authority.

If they have to hire shepherds and pied pipers that is the FIRST dogmatic proof that they are not qualified. Anyone who would permit a "school of the bible" to be turned (diverted as boasted) into a "theater for holy entertainment" is what you call your every day WOLF. Now, V-jo, you watch for my posting on 1 Cor 6 and I will prove that all of the PERFORMANCE roles are led by DEMAGOGUES who by definition "control others by the use of performing arts." Even Nimrod would be a better leader. Their LIFTING UP with excitement put down by the death of Christ and the REST (sabbath) He gave is is OUTLAWED in Romans 15. The purpose of the demagogues is connected DIRECTLY to the the word KLEPTOMAI. Judas was a kleptes and he had the BAG which was "for carrying the mouth peaces of wind instruments."

There is NO musical concept connected with the worship of a SPIRIT God from Genesis to Revelation. On the other hand MUSIC or SINGING as been identified as IDOLATRY from beginning to the end. SINGING was Moses' proof that the people were PLAYING which means singing and getting AROUSED. Peck, it is all just hallucinated and you are trying to justify something which HAPPENED in the last few years of the prophesied end times.

I say that the rumblings began at Madison when Shelly came to Nashville and had to be released from Lipscomb. If you can peg the beginning of Jubilee (1985-7) about the time Lucado returned with a bait of Spiritism as the beginning of the apostasy at Madison and a few other churches. I think people just blinked about 2000-1 but they were not SUPPOSED to have caught on until the complete diversion was in place. By now you would be into instruments. And, in fact, the kind of singing induced by Keith is MORE DAMAGING to the body, soul and spirit than a quiet pipe organ or piano. Nimrod and modern medical science knows that it WORKS because you are inducing a DRUG HIGH by the use of sight, soung and motion. That is not remotely Christ and if OSHA ever caught on you would have a ribbon placed on the door to quarantine it.

The fact that the YOUNG have more residual stability makes it FUN for the kids but destructive to MOST mature people.

Peter COMMANDED that If you speak you speak as the ORACLES OF GOD. Then if you have TALENT you used that for MINISTRY. For the literate the ORACLE spoke in a soft, slow voice and the ORACLE was bound to speak ONLY what had been revealed. While keith is functioning as an Apollo oracle, he is NOT inspired.

The word SPEAK specificially commanded for the Greek Ekklesia (or synagogue) was "in a whisper or conversational tone." That is like an ORACLE deliveres it.

The other word for SPEAK which includes WORD or LOGOS means to SPEAK to the exclusion of MUSIC.

The command for elders and Paul to the ekklesia in Romans 15 was to speak with ONE MIND and ONE MOUTH using "that which is written" or "scripture." You are defending the direct violation of the word of God. Not to worry: the sermons I have heard directly contradict the Word. The command was so that you edify or EDUCATE: you are violating that because there is NO plan to educate. All of the MUSIC history in the Bible proves that it is to SILENCE the Word of God: case proven and you violate the spirit and the letter of the bible. Not to worry because that is not the AGENDA of the new style worship which as their OWN vision from God.

The other function Paul commanded for speaking the "songs and sermons" of the Spirit of Christ is that you GLORIFY GOD. You are not: it is not remotely possible to perform as a musician without getting ALL of the glory evey if you claim to give it to god. Any one who stands BETWEEN the "body" and God CLAIMS to be the MEDIATOR and I say they BELIEVE that they are "celestial beings." The American Guild of Organists was founded on the premise that musicians were INSPIRED. All of the evidence proves that they are SOURCED from Lucifer (Zoe) in order to BLEED OFF worship due only to God.

I know your pain but YOU have a serious issue with God and so does anyone who PRETENDS to speak to or for God. That is what God Agrippa (?) afflicted with MAGGOTS and He build himself a WORSHIP CENTER at Tyre just like Lucifer the "singing and harp playing prostitute."

Whey you say HE IS THE BEST you are in deep doodoo or voodoo: you ARE praising the musical performer whom Jesus identified as a HYPOCRITE by pointing to the prophets to include speakers, singers and instrumentalists ALL "seeing godliness as a means of financal gain." That means seeing anything but GOING as an evangelists as OCCUPATION. Peter identified them as corrupters of the Word meaning to "sell at retail."

You are NOT defending the Synagogue of Christ but the rankest form of pagan "worship center." I know, I know, but what you THANK cannot TRUMP God and His word honored by those hundreds who have been DELIBERATELY DISCORDED with the knowledge aforehand that you might lose HALF of the "owners." Nothing can TRUMP or ever forgive the offending of hundreds of those for whom Jesus Died.

Now, I am sure that you don't care but THAT is the difference between an EKKLESIA and a CIRCE or KIRKE whom John identified with her singers, musicians and ALL religious operatives and performing SORCERY. In fact, all arousal singing words are defined as ENCHANTMENT or SORCERY and that is unforgiveable.

God cannot USE human talent or he would have had apostles from Jerusalem U (Sodom U) and he had a grand musical worship team which he destroyed along with their harps.

The REMNANT means that you will be with Jesus OUTSIDE of the polus suffering reproaches when He comes: he will not endure the same MOCKING right up to the Cross. It WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN.

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"I'm not defending a man of faith as Keith"

August 8 2006, 4:26 PM 

Untruth Buster,
I'm not defending a man of faith as Keith..He needs no defense..I learned early that God had a purpose for him and he took the challenge..Do you think a worship leader's job only consists of leading singing...God is changing the standards for his worship period..The congregation my folks planted had preachers come to preach that only received as little as 15 cents ...about 13 cents more than they deserved...The old benches were a bad standard..padded pews are much better..When I was little,the only verse us boys knew was "Jesus Wept"..now we have paid staff to handle the class instruction process..Little kids now..know more than I...

You are entitled to your opinion ...You are not entitled to slander your leadership..When I said Celestial being...I meant God..Jude tells us that we sometimes slander celestal beings ....God is the one who authorized elders and church leaders to lead his body...and when you slander them..You slander God...Disagreeing is not slander..Leaving is not slander..But you are expressing actions that is slander...For your information,Keith's mind is always on his service to our Lord..He doesn't concern himself with your negativeness but always lifts up our Lord in some kind of praise...He is under the authoriy of the elders ..

You might ask yourself...Why is praising God so evil? Is there some kind of laws in the bible that regulate praise to God...? Madison is timid compared to 4th and Otter..The CoC is going to change but there will alway be congregations that will keep our heritage intact..We have the privilege to meet with them when we choose...Worship style is just a choice..

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
Jimmy Wren
(no login)
68.19.221.28

Slander celestial beings: "the source this came from?"

August 8 2006, 4:30 PM 

peck, I have never heard this before. You wrote: "When I said Celestial being...I meant God..Jude tells us that we sometimes slander celestal beings ....God is the one who authorized elders and church leaders to lead his body...and when you slander them..You slander God..."

Could you be specific and provide the source this came from?

In christ,
Jimmy


 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"Untruth Buster is rejecting it and he grumbles and faultfinds"

August 8 2006, 4:36 PM 

Jimmy,
Fair question about the celestial beings..

I'm not placing Donnie in the context of Jude...Donnie is a Godly man...Jude is about ungodly men....

However,those of us who are Godly can by ignorance slander a celestial being..though grace is ready to understand...What do I mean...?

What characteristic attitude was involved in Jude that caused slander of a celestal being...

(1)verse 8..reject authority

(2)verse 16...grumblers and fault finders

God is a celestal being...God gave the elders and deacons at Madison authority...Untruth Buster is rejecting it and he grumbles and faultfinds...Slandering my family and the elders that is over them with his self appointed position as .............don't exactly know...If he has been given an assignment by the elders to sit in the balcony and report his thoughts to the public,then OK,I'll lay off...but he is a self appointed critic defying authority as best I see.....

And he will keep on and on and on and.....But I admire his faith..I'm good at religion but weak on faith...

BTW,how was the lake house get together?

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.221.28

"Get over it" is not God's authority.

August 8 2006, 4:42 PM 

Mine is not a self appointed position -- unlike someone's claim to be the congregation's "Worship Leader."

I've never rejected authority in accordance with the Scriptures. You're certainly confused about plain authority versus authority that is God-directed.

Pointing out the results of division and alienation among the brethren stemming from unwise and truth-compromising decisions is hardly fault-finding. Romans 16:17 -- "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them."

I shouldn't have to keep reminding you and others that I was not the one who said with "authority" [that you speak of]: "If you don't like it ... get over it; we must move on."

Evidently, man's authority means more to you than what authority God would have elders to have. I honestly believe that "Get over it" is not God's authority.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
BrianRasmussen
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"The church that I am a member of does not pay our worship leader..."

August 8 2006, 4:46 PM 

U.B.,

Whatever your church decides to do is their business. I won't attack them for it. In fact, the church that I am a member of does not pay our worship leader, either. He is on the church staff, but he is an unpaid volunteer.

I like it when we sing the old hymns, but I wouldn't want an exclusive diet of it. I love the contemporary music as well. I think our mixture is ideal. We praise our Lord with the contemporary music and we receive instruction and encouragement through the hymns that we sing.

The assembly that I am a member of only formed about 10 years old. Early in it's history (I am told) it was heavily into the Purpose Driven movement, but they eventually repented of some of the seeker sensative parts of it. There used to be secular songs played in order to draw the unsaved in. But the pastor and the other elders (I think correctly) decided that it was better to have a smaller crowd of unsaved in the interest of drawing them to Christ instead of the building.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.221.28

"... that all-contemporary-music is not a good diet, either"

August 8 2006, 4:48 PM 

Brian,

Thanks for the info.

I would like to say that all-contemporary-music is not a good diet, either. And this is happening these days in certain churches where the great scriptural hymns are fast-becoming extinct. What makes it worse in certain situations is when the "Worship Leader" would resort to hymns only that are somewhat difficult to sing -- giving the "Praise Team" a great chance to PERFORM and show off their musical talent. In essence, folks are being sung to and become spectators.

No, I'm not interested in the name of the church building. That's simply for public information -- giving people the idea where they're entering in.

Again, thanks for the insight.

U.B.

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.19.221.28

"I think we are both just immature christians" [?]

August 8 2006, 4:51 PM 

Donnie,
I think we are both just immature christians..I realize that even as old as I am,that growing up in the Lord is always a distance off...

Maybe,it's not what is going on in an assembly of the saints that's upsetting to either of us..but rather,maybe it's what's going on inside us...Power gained by slander is unearned power..Power gained by putting you down is unearned power...My attempt to reason with you has not been successful and I just would like to call you brother and ease off...

God bless,Peck


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.19.221.28

"I do not have a problem with where I stand on issues"

August 8 2006, 4:54 PM 

Peck,

I do not have a problem with where I stand on issues that the church faces today. I'm the one who has not changed. And I continue to stress that it's better for a congregation to stay away from CONTROVERSIAL and UNNECESSARY CHANGES. It does not matter whether it is a salvation issue or not. It's just not worth it. Having said all that, I don't think I'm being an immature Christian. In fact, I think otherwise -- it is maturity.

I'm just speaking for myself ... and hoping that you will stop attacking me.

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.152.99.43

An urgent message to the elders: restore your authority

August 9 2006, 11:34 AM 

The best way to honor the godly elders is to feed information about the MARK of music. Most of this has been blurred in the the Rabinnic Universities now turning out actors and musicians to be MEDIATORS in song and sermon. I would love to hear from someone with the PLEDGE of confidentiality.

As we write the eternal battle against the CAINITES or Kenites who ruled in Jerusalem until recently is going on in the SAME PLACE the original battle took place. There it is literally: in many once upon a time churches (schools of the Bible) it is taking place with the same Cainites (from a musical mark) who HAVE seduced faithful people away from the WORD as it has been taught and they USE the same kind of MUSIC Satan through the fallen angels and the YOUTH using "mixed sex choirs, instruments (real or organic), seductive appearance (the authential or female sexual authority and whatever you may find in a FALLEN church. Azazel is the fallen angel Israel sacrificed the Scape Goat to after God turned them over to worship the Starry Hosts pointed to in the BEGINNING and the ENDING of the Bible.

In Acts 20 Paul warned about ELDERS who are WOLVES and not SHEPHERD. The wolf is the universal message of sexual perverts to TAKE the flock and USE them. The definition of a DEMAGOGUE is one who "uses popular arts to appeas the crowd" and he USES them defined by the word KLEPTOMAI.

Lucifer in the garden is seen as "bisexual" who DECEIVED or wholly seduced Eve but took Adam easily. Jude points to the same people who USE people for their own LUSTS and PROFIT by pointing to The Book of Enoch. This book is quoted at least 128 times throughout the New Testament and was once in the canon because it defines the JUBAL family. Jubal gave his name to JUBILEE.
    "In pagan traditions, musical instruments are invented by gods or demi-gods, such as titans. In the Bible, credit is assigned to antediluvian patriarchs, for example, the descendants of Cain in Genesis 4:21. There is no other biblical tradition about the invention of musical instruments." (Freedman, David Noel, Bible Review, Summer 1985, p. 51).
The clear message in the Bible
    And his brothers name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ. Gen 4:21

    Handle means:

    Taphas (h8610) taw-fas'; a prim. root; to manipulate, i. e. seize; chiefly to capture, wield; spec. to overlay; fig. to use unwarrantably: - catch, handle, (lay, take) hold (on, over), stop, * surely, surprise, take.
      Taphaph (h8608) taw-faf'; a prim. root; to drum, i. e. play (as) on the tambourine: - taber, play with timbrels.

      Topheth (h8612) to'-feth; the same as 8611; Topheth, a place near Jerus.: - Tophet, Topheth.
Topheth is God's IMAGE of Hell itself: it was king Solomon's MUSIC GROVE where they eventially began burning babies (the Canaan land messag) to Molech. The used loud singing and beat on drums (hand clapping means to HISS or BOO and to VOMIT.

Isaiah 30 clearly says that HELL was specificially prepared for Satan, his fallen angels and those who get seduced by ANY kind of "music."

First, Jude begins with the Biblical principle of the ONLY Authority:
    Jude 3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

    Jude 13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.

    Jude 14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,

    Jude 15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.

    Jude 16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having mens persons in admiration because of advantage.

    Jude 17 But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;

    Jude 18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.


    They PIPED as children trying to get Jesus to sing and dance!

    Jude 19 These be they who separate (g592 repudiate and form a sect or party) themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.
The Book of Enoch and similar writings, and defined in the Bible, says that Satan used the youth to SEDUCE people away from the Living Word. They used mixed-sex choirs, instruments (mouth bands means the same thing) and sexual attractiveness to seduce people through LUST of the flesh and LUST of the ears. There is NO OTHER MESSAGE. It is repeated FOR US in Revelation 17-18.

Enoch 7:1 It happened after the sons of men had multiplied in those days, that daughters were born to them, elegant and beautiful.

Enoch 7: 2 And when the angels, (3) the sons of heaven, beheld them, they became enamoured of them, saying to each other, Come, let us select for ourselves wives from the progeny of men, and let us beget children.
    (3) An Aramaic text reads "Watchers" here (J.T. Milik, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4 [Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976], p. 167).
Enoch 7: 3 Then their leader Samyaza said to them; I fear that you may perhaps be indisposed to the performance of this enterprise;

Enoch 7: 4 And that I alone shall suffer for so grievous a crime.

Enoch 7: 5 But they answered him and said; We all swear;

Enoch 7: 6 And bind ourselves by mutual execrations, that we will not change our intention, but execute our projected undertaking.

Enoch 7: 7 Then they swore all together, and all bound themselves by mutual execrations. Their whole number was two hundred, who descended upon Ardis, (4) which is the top of mount Armon. (Hermon)
    (4) Upon Ardis. Or, "in the days of Jared" (R.H. Charles, ed. and trans., The Book of Enoch [Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1893], p. 63).

Enoch 7: 8 That mountain therefore was called Armon, because they had sworn upon it,(5) and bound themselves by mutual execrations.
    (5) Mt. Armon, or Mt. Hermon, derives its name from the Hebrew word herem, a curse (Charles, p. 63).
    Charam (h2763) khaw-ram'; a prim. root; to seclude; spec. (by a ban) to devote to religious uses (espec. destruction); phys. and reflex. to be blunt as to the nose: - make accursed, consecrate, (utterly) destroy, devote, forfeit, have a flat nose, utterly (slay, make away).
Enoch 7: 10 Then they took wives, each choosing for himself; whom they began to approach, and with whom they cohabited; teaching them sorcery, incantations, and the dividing of roots and trees.

Enoch 7: 11 And the women conceiving brought forth giants, (7)
    (7) The Greek texts vary considerably from the Ethiopic text here. One Greek manuscript adds to this section, "And they [the women] bore to them [the Watchers] three races: first, the great giants. The giants brought forth [some say "slew"] the Naphelim, and the Naphelim brought forth [or "slew"] the Elioud. And they existed, increasing in power according to their greatness."
Enoch 8:1 Moreover Azazyel taught men to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, the fabrication of mirrors, and the workmanship of bracelets and ornaments, the use of paint, the beautifying of the eyebrows, the use of stones of every valuable and select kind, and all sorts of dyes, so that the world became altered.

Enoch 8:2 colouring tinctures. And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they

Enoch 8:3 were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways. Semjaza taught enchantments, and root-cuttings, 'Armaros the resolving of enchantments [music], Baraqijal (taught) astrology, Kokabel the constellations, Ezeqeel the knowledge of the clouds, Araqiel the signs of the earth, Shamsiel the signs of the sun, and Sariel the course of the moon. And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven.


God came with a FIREY LAW to execute judgment against Israel when they fell into the Musical Idolatry of the Egyptian Trinity. They LOST the Covenant of Grace and were placed under Kings specificially to CARRY OUT the captivity and death sentence. When they USE the Gentile-like Monarchy they are clearly working against God.

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.154.169.169

"Concerned members is not healthy for the body of Christ"

August 11 2006, 12:27 AM 

Donnie,

It's not your thinking that churches should be considerate about making changes that I'm against...It's just that I wish to expose your slander with the facts..

You claim to know the heart of the worship leader and slander his talent before the body of Christ..Your worship is being hindered not by him but by your own inner conflicts...

There was nothing wrong with those people leaving..It's our privilege to go to another congregation if we don't fall in place with the one we are in...Are you speaking for them?..Are you a self appointed leader for those who left? If someone was slandering your family,would you think that confronting them with the truth would be attacking?

I see that you and Piney and some others have an agenda to put a new division upon the church...An agenda not about salvation matters (which you admit it's not)...but..about matters of opinion..choices that congregations can make..with the authority of God being with them...Let it go...If it's not the best thing,it will wear itself out and new ideas will take it's place..Change will happen..

Concerned members is not healthy for the body of Christ..It's about grumbling against opinions not salvation matters..I think your idea that I'm attacking you is only your conscience having to face the facts that your slander is a lie...

It's not my place to control your behaviour..Your elders are great men of faith..They don't need me to help..Contemporary is just a worship style ..It's an expression of faith..no better or no worse than traditional style...Quit slandering my family
and I will quit opposing you..

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.154.169.169

It's about "controversial and/or unnecessary changes"

August 11 2006, 12:31 AM 

Peck,

May I say this politely, since you keep advising me the same old thingy? You should be giving your advice to those who are that eager to change God's directives for the church. I think you are too old to be unwisely accepting any controversial and unnecessary changes that come your way -- salvation issue or not. Remember the KEY WORDS:

CONTROVERSIAL AND/OR UNNECESSARY CHANGES

That's the simplicity of my message.

Believe me: Slandering God with "musical worship" and "Praise Team" performances and fallacious teachings and distorted biblical messages in the songs ... is worse than your claimed slandering of your precious son-in-law. My messages concerning the "Musical Worship Leader" thingy are no different from pointing out the misdirections that Rubel Shelly and Max Lucado are taking the church to.

Sorry, but "an ounce of prevention is [MUCH MORE THAN] worth a pound of cure."

Donnie

 
 Respond to this message   
peck
(no login)
68.154.169.169

"This concerned members thing is a defiance of the freedom that we have in Christ"

August 11 2006, 12:47 AM 

Donnie,
What you have in your heart about our CoC heritage and keeping it from changing is in the hearts of people in most all congregations..I understand and have no problem with that...We need to tread lovingly into changes..

Let me say that I appreciate you saying that your stand is not built on matters of salvation..Our congregation is full of those who think as you..but..we are changing rapidly..some leave in peace..most stay but still honor our leadership...It's just normal Donnie.You have plenty of company with your perception of how a worship service should be...

What is wrong in your case is your defiance of the leadership that you are a part of...Do you agree with Phil's preaching..or Brother White's ?
Do you agree that singing acappella is ok and that it is alright to do so? Do you agree that it is alright for the elders and those from the congregation can come forward "with" the one responding to the invitation to pray with them and encourage them.....?(my thoughts are that some who left thought that this was pentacostalism )

Do you agree that proper prayer is being done? Do you believe that the communion service is in honor of Christ's death? Do you agree that many baptism's are happening and that each one is treated in a special way? Do you agree that the love feast is a happy time for most(I'm timid and don't enjoy them but that's my problem)...Do you agree on the fine programs for the community? Do you agree that that the young people are edified and encouraged? Do you agree in the closing prayer?

Why are you fixated on the song leader and rebel so fiercely..letting your heart lead you to come in late not caring that your brothers and sisters are worshiping in song..Where is your heart Donnie? Is it in defiance of change and you fail to see the beauty of the service?

Let go Donnie..This concerned members thing is a defiance of the freedom that we have in Christ..I'm so thankful that you recognize that the concerned members stuff is not a salvation matter..It's an attempt to keep peace in the congregations by not making changes..ok..but the way you are gong about it is wrong...Your idea is not the problem..It's your pride..

However,I realize that you take pride in the cross and I also realize that you are far more a theologian than I...I envy your faith but not your religion...Anger is a common problem for us all...Your expression of anger toward your leadership should be kept private and not expressed publicly...

Oh well...God bless you,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   
amazed
(no login)
68.154.169.169

"... you want a 1950's church"

August 11 2006, 12:54 AM 

untruth- (most appropriately named poster of 2006 award-winner)

When you fell out of the stupid tree, you must have hit every branch on your way down. Do you know where there is a church that exactly resembles a first century church?
Nowhere.
You know why? Because no one would go to it. Churches have to CHANGE Donnie. You don't want a first century church, you want a 1950's church. The number of those like you are thankfully getting smaller... and smaller.... and smaller.....AHHHHHHH, you're melting!!!!!!

By the way, a mature Christian, even a mature person, Christian or not, does not use the word "thingy". Not straight ones at least.


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.154.169.169

"The "1950s church" is a trademark defense label coined by the change agents"

August 11 2006, 12:57 AM 

The "1950s church" is a trademark defense label coined by the change agents ... whatever that signifies.

No, Amazed, the thousands of congregations are not melting. That's only your sad hope that they will. Maybe, it is your deceived mind melting! I can tell. Besides, as you claim, your family ... your parents and other members are still in the church that, only in your own mind, is melting.

Churches "have to" change? No way ... only a few congregations with liberal-minded elders have implemented instrumental music in the assembly. Just look at wave runner's Oak Hills congregation -- an example of the notion that "churches have to change."

U.B.


 
 Respond to this message   
R E [Rick]
(no login)
68.154.169.169

"... still wearing those white gloves"

August 11 2006, 1:00 AM 

Donnie,

Say hi to Ward and June Cleaver next time you see them. I hope she's still wearing those white gloves.

Rick


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.154.169.169

"... but several centuries ago..."

August 11 2006, 1:02 AM 

Maybe, I was born, not a generation or two ago, but several centuries ago. I'll say "hi" to the Cleavers, nonetheless.

 
 Respond to this message   
v-jo
(no login)
68.154.169.169

"Change is a sign of life."

August 11 2006, 1:05 AM 

The church is a living, bearthing entity, not an inanimate object.

Change is a sign of life.

No change is a sign that rigor mortis has set in.


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
68.154.169.169

"God's truth is not changing. Neither is the bride of Christ, His church. "

August 11 2006, 1:07 AM 

So, is the truth, God's Word. It is living, indeed! But it is not changing. God's truth is not changing. Neither is the bride of Christ, His church. There is not a sign that "rigor mortis" has [or should] set in -- either in the truth or in God's kingdom.

 
 Respond to this message   
Jimmy Wren
(no login)
68.154.169.169

elders="men who must give an account."

August 11 2006, 1:12 AM 

amazed writes: "...you (UB) said: "I've never rejected authority in accordance with the Scriptures. You're certainly confused about plain authority versus authority that is God-directed."

Liar.

Hebrews 13:17
Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you"

*****************


Jimmy replies: elders="men who must give an account." Another way we could state this would be "as accountable men."

All that Donnie is trying to do is get the elders to be accountable to the membership that they were selected to serve and there is a membership side to accountability.

Anyone who believes that the elders are not accountable to the Christian individuals that they serve is confused as to what being a leader is all about.

In Christ,
Jimmy

 
 Respond to this message   
v-jo
(no login)
68.154.169.169

"What Donnie wants is to control the leadership."

August 11 2006, 1:16 AM 

Donnie does not mean "accountable" in the same sense Scripture means it.

"All that Donnie is trying to do is get the elders to be accountable to the membership that they were selected to serve and there is a membership side to accountability."

They have been. What Donnie wants is to control the leadership. Not make them accountable to the congregation, because they already are. Not to obey the leadership, as Scripture instructs (he forget the verse part of that verse - obey so their work will be a joy). Big difference in what Donnie wants and what Scripture says.


 
 Respond to this message   
Jimmy Wren
(no login)
68.154.169.169

"The leadership of 2000 imploded!"

August 11 2006, 1:19 AM 

v-jo. you are wrong. The leadership of 2000 imploded! That leadership refused to be accountable to the congregation and the results of that can be read at CM.

How many elders stopped eldering at Madison? How many deacons stopped deaconing at Madison? What happened to the other song leaders at Madison? Where is Ray Walker? Where is Nick Boone?

You and peck and others are not defending the church and truth there, you are defending the results, i.e. the church that has emerged from the ungodly actions of the elders that bought about an unwelcome change.

In Christ,
Jimmy


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.152.159.166

Apollyon and His MUSES or LOCUSTS have landed!

August 11 2006, 5:49 PM 

As Anti-Christian and Anti- the church and Anti-RESTJesus died to give us to liberate us FROM the musical anxiety creators, DEFENDING it and Demonizing those who oppose the HOSTILE TAKEOVER to, as confessed, change the church into a THEATER FOR HOLY ENTERTAINMENT, is as evil and wicked as one can get. The GUILT CLAUSE has always been pulled out by the ANTI-Christians to blame the victim being shot by the SECTARIAN for squirting blood on his/her dancing slippers.

So, don't try the old SLICK SLUG trick and lead silly women astray with you. Madison is NOT an ekklesia or synagogue of Christ but a PAGAN WORSHIP CENTER or all known Biblical and secular history has no meaning. I know that Peck is pretty good at denying plain facts.

Peck, you are complicit when you accuse those DELIBERATELY DISCORDED with the discord the hireling-changlings BOAST that they have to do before they can BREAK DOWN all resistance. So, don't expect Ken Sublett to be PUT OFF by the well agreed upon effort to shift the blame.

The sounding brass was, in effect, a Pipe Organ which reproduced certain pitches of speech or music. The "wind" of the speaker "blew" across the theater into the "pipe" with the same effect of a modern instrument.
    1Co 13:1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

    1Co 13:2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.

    1Co 13:3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.

    1Co 13:4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,

For the literate Paul points to all forms of musical "religion" as pagan. EVEN if you could do all of those things and had no love it would have no value. Paul DOES NOT commend any of them.

Remember: We finally gotta tell 'em that we gonna make this church a THEATER FOR HOLY ENTERTAINMEN. Fine, Just in time to fulfill prophecy. I have been waiting for GOD'S spectacle!

THEATRUM

The acoustic properties of a Greek theatre would be naturally good, since the actors had a high wall behind them and a rising slope in front. Vitruvius, indeed, says that artificial aid was sought from brazen vessels, which the Greeks call êcheia, so placed in the auditorium as to reverberate the voices of the actors. He even speaks of these resonators as being nicely adapted to the required musical pitch (ii. 1, 9). The theatre at Aizani in Cilicia has a series of niches above the diazôma: and similar niches exist elsewhere. According to one view, these niches held the êcheia, while another connects them merely with the substructions of seats. The statement of Vitruvius leaves no doubt that êcheia were used, at least sometimes, in the theatres of his own day: but it remains uncertain whether such a device was employed by the Greeks of an earlier time.
    Echeion, to, ( [êchos] ) drum, gong, Plu.Crass.23, Apollod. ap. Sch. Theoc.2.36, Procop.Gaz.Ecphr.p.153B.; tambourine, as head-dress, Herm.Trism.in Rev.Phil.32.254; used for stage-thunder, Sch.Ar. Nu.292; as sounding-boards in the theatre, Vitr.5.5.2.

    II. in the lyre, = chalkôma, apptly. a metallic sounding-plate, Hsch.; so of the palate, Gal.UP7.5.

    2. Adj. êcheion organon sounding instrument, Ph.1.588, cj.ib.444,510.

    Organon, 3. musical instrument, Simon.31, f.l. in A.Fr.57.1 ; ho men di' organôn ekêlei anthrôpous, of Marsyas, Pl.Smp.215c ; aneu organôn psilois logois ibid., cf. Plt.268b ; o. poluchorda Id.R.399c , al.; met' ôidês kai tinôn organôn Phld.Mus.p.98K. ; of the pipe, Melanipp.2, Telest.1.2.

    Echetês , ou, ho, Ep. êcheta^ , Dor. achetas , acheta, ( [êcheô] )

    A. clear-sounding, musical, shrill, donax achetas A.Pr.575 (lyr.); kuknos E.El.151 (lyr.); epith. of the cicada, chirping, êcheta tettix Hes. Op.582 , AP 7.201 (Pamphil.); achetat. ib.213 (Arch.): abs., achetas, ho, the chirper, i.e. the male cicada, Anan.5.6, Ar.Pax1159 (lyr.), Av.1095 (lyr.), cf. Arist.HA532b16,556a20: Orph.A.1250 has Ep.acc. êcheta porthmon the sounding strait.

    Donax n1 n2 n3 [from doneô, "a reed shaken by the wind," cf. rhips from rhiptô]
    Luke 7:24 And when the messengers of John were departed, he began to speak unto the people concerning John, What went ye out into the wilderness for to see? A reed shaken with the wind?

    don-eô, A. shake, of the effects of the wind, to de te pnoiai doneousin they shake the young tree kardian to agitate one's mind, hêmas edonêsen hê mousikê, II. of sound, murmur, buzz, of bees, prob. in h.Merc.563; d. throon humnôn rouse the voice of song, Pi.N.7.81:--also in Med. or Pass., luran te boai kanachai t' aulôn doneontai Id.P.10.39 ; of bees, Choeril.2; rhoizêmasin aithêr doneitai Ar.Av.1183 .--Poet. word, used in Ion., X.Smp.2.8, and late Prose; of medical percussion, Aret.SD2.1

    "Yobal (Jubal). (Note: Jubilee or "a blast of trumpets" is from Jubal which means "to lead with triumph or pomp.") and Tobalkin (Tubal-Cain), the two brethren, the sons of Lamech, the blind man, who killed Cain, invented and made all kinds of instruments (or metal weapons) of music.

    Hippolytus V

    "Yobal made reed instruments, and harps, and flutes, and whistles, and the devils went and dwelt inside them.When men blew into the pipes, the devils sang inside them,

    And Satan had been made ruler (or prince) of that camp Fol. 12b, col. 2. And when the men and women were

    stirred up to lascivious frenzy by the devilish playing of the reeds which emitted musical sounds, and by the harps which the men played through the operation of the power of the devils , and by the sounds of the tambourines and of the sistra which were beaten and rattled through the agency of evil spirits, the sounds of their laughter were heard in the air above them, and ascended to that holy mountain.
    But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft (clothes of a Catamite=male prostitute) raiment? Behold, they which are gorgeously apparelled, and live delicately (effeminate), are in kings courts. Luke 7:25
They expected that the "prophesiers" would be male prostitutes who would help you locate a goat or serve your needs. Jesus identifies the HYPOCRITES by point to Isaiah and Ezekiel 33 to point directly to the "love" songs and well played instruments.
    Luke 7:26 But what went ye out for to see? A prophet? Yea, I say unto you, and much more than a prophet.
Pi.N.7.81 Pindar, Nemean Odes 7

[9] For he lives in a city that loves music, the city of the Aeacidae with their clashing spears; [10] and they very much want to foster a spirit familiar with contests. If someone is successful in his deeds, he casts a cause for sweet thoughts into the streams of the Muses. For those great acts of prowess dwell in deep darkness, if they lack songs, and we know of only one way to hold a mirror up to fine deeds

[15] if, by the grace of Mnemosyne with her splendid headdress, one finds a recompense for toils in glorious song. [17] Skillful men know the wind that will come on the day after tomorrow, and they do not suffer loss through the love of gain. The rich man and the poor man alike travel together to the boundary of death. [20] And I expect that the story of Odysseus came to exceed his experiences, through the sweet songs of Homer, [22] since there is a certain solemnity in his lies and winged artfulness, and poetic skill deceives, seducing us with stories, and the heart of the mass of men is blind.

Strike up the song! The Muse welds together gold and white ivory with coral, the lily she has stolen from beneath the ocean's dew. [80] But in remembrance of Zeus and in honor of Nemea, whirl a far-famed strain of song, softly. On this spot it is fitting to sing with a gentle voice of the king of gods.

To plough the same ground three or four times [105] is poverty of thought, like babbling "Corinth of Zeus" to children.

Id.P.10.39 Pindar.Neaman 10. [31] Once Perseus, the leader of his people, entered their homes and feasted among them, when he found them sacrificing glorious hecatombs of donkeys to the god. In the festivities of those people [35] and in their praises Apollo rejoices most, and he laughs when he sees the erect arrogance of the beasts. [37] The Muse is not absent from their customs; all around swirl the dances of girls, the lyres loud chords and the cries of flutes. [40] They wreathe their hair with golden laurel branches and revel joyfully.


HERE IS WHERE THE SINGERS VIOLATE THE DIRECT COMMAND OF PAUL TO CONSIDER THE INFIRM WHO ARE MOST AFFLICTED WITH MUSICAL SOUNDS WHICH AROUSE ANXIETY

No sickness or ruinous old age is mixed into that sacred race; without toil or battles [43] they live without fear of strict Nemesis.

The Muses work for Apollo, Abaddon or Apollyon. The Muses are identified as the LOCUSTS who werel to be unleashed by Apollo the "having fallen star."

Tettix cicala, Cicada plebeia or allied species, a winged insect fond of basking on trees, when the male makes a chirping or clicking noise by means of certain drums or 'tymbals' underneath the wings, a prov. for garrulity,

Plato calls them hoi Mousôn prophêtai,


Musical prophesying is defined by John in Revelation as SORCERERS.

Usually used with:

Aeidô [compare the morphological problems with aeirô]
I. to sing, Il., etc.:--then of any sound, to twang, of the bowstring, Od.; to whistle, of the wind, Mosch.; to ring, of a stone struck, Theocr.
II. trans.,
1. c. acc. rei, to sing, chant, mênin, paiêona, klea andrôn Hom.:--absol., aeidein amphi tinos to sing in one's praise, Od.:--Pass., of songs, to be sung, Hdt.; aisma kalôs aisthen Xen.
2. c. acc. pers. to sing, praise, attic


These are the LOCUSTS or musical performers under Apollo who is the Apollyon or Abaddon of John. In Revelation 17 they SERVE the Babylon Harlot and the singers and musicians in Revelation 18:22 are called SORCERERS by which they deceived the world.

Sounding brass intends to DECEIVE and overpower the paying audience.

That is why when Moses heard idolaltry at Mount Sinai he said: "It is SINGING that I heard." Paul put the SPEAK or SAY in the human spirit and said nothing about external MUSIC.

APOLLYON is the HAVING FALLEN STAR and the Musical Ministers are the MUSES or musical prophesiers John identified them as under the Babylon Harlot performing SORCERY. ALL singing and musical terms in the Greek text are defined as ENCHANTMENT or SORCERY.

And that, enemy of the Word, is why you CANNOT ever repent if we believe the Biblical and other testimony about music being the MARK or the STING of the Scorpion tales of the Locust or musical agents of Satan.

THOSE are the facts and no one can refute them. You accept them or get ready for God to beat you into HELL (maybe already) with music according to Isaiah 30. Being a capella means ORGANUM so the NO INSTRUMENTS is just a legalistic dodge.

 
 Respond to this message   
YTBH
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"... because Madison, geogr. & demogr., is not as desirable for upscale...."

August 12 2006, 5:39 PM 

Jimmy,

Ray Walker resigned as song leader many years ago to go on the road with an Elvis Presley tribute show. I saw him 1 month ago at the Nashville Flea Market (shopping). Nick Boone and his family live on the other side of Nashville now. I believe he and his lovely wife moved there because most of their family lives in that area. I love them both and have seen them many times in recent years. Many former members have moved away because Madison, geographically and demographically, is not as desirable for upscale living as it once was. That is not an insult to anybody, just a fact of urban life.

Ask Donnie what happened to the elders who left Madison. I am not going there, but a few rocks have been overturned and what was underneath was not pretty. The current eldership is alive and well and leading the congregation just fine. They have been hosting luncheons for small groups over the summer to converse one-on-one with families and answer any questions members have.

YTBH

 
 Respond to this message   
YTBH
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"... Nick is Pat's kid brother... a truly lovely man."

August 12 2006, 5:42 PM 

You probably already know this, but Nick is Pat's kid brother... a truly lovely man.

YTBH

 
 Respond to this message   
literal seed
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"... from that point forward the power struggle in the eldership began...."

August 12 2006, 5:47 PM 

[since you mention huntin fishin and skinnin], that's who we had as a minister after dr. flatt left. you would never hear him call himself doctor...just steve. i remember jimmy's(sites) first lesson after coming to madison. he took his shoes off and left them at pulpit side left, and walked down to floor or pew level. he said those are my shoes and they fit just fine. i'll never try to fill ira, steve or anyone else's shoes. i can't and don't believe God wants me to. he said he would make just two promises for all to hear. he held up his bible and said, " if it's not in this book you will not hear me speak about it...if it is in this book, you most likely will...if you are here to hear it. it may make you uncomfortable, but God's Word is truth that will set you free." from that point forward the power struggle in the eldership began...behind closed doors.

jimmy wren...the implosion as you call it was and is a pruning of branches. they started by stopping jimmy(sites) from speaking some of the things that he wanted to teach about...but it wasn't time anyway...God's time. he has moved on as many others have at madison. they come and they go...just like at your assembly. don't they come and go where you are? i thought that was just natural. what we see now is a strong nucleus of servants, just as we always have had, who are growing in Spiritual freedom with some of the traditional shakles removed. the ones that didn't approve of the eldership's decisions have moved on. from my interaction with some of them as i've visited other assemblies in the area, there are happy ones and sad ones. i believe that's just the way it is. i'm almost 60 now and have been a part of Messiah's redeemed for almost 25 years. one thing i see in all people as they age, especially in the church, is that they are just like the fruit of the vine. they either get mellow and sweeter with age...or they turn to vinegar.

bap,
ls

ps...with a sister like ytbh, how could i ever complain?


 
 Respond to this message   
YTBH
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"Others will not even acknowledge my existence."

August 12 2006, 5:50 PM 

Literal Seed said, "one thing i see in all people as they age, especially in the church, is that they are just like the fruit of the vine. they either get mellow and sweeter with age...or they turn to vinegar."
====
Chuck, you hit the nail on the head with that one! As you know, I have been at Madison since I was a very young child. I have known most of the senior saints all of that time. I was sad to see some of them leave and miss them still. I still greet them warmly whenever I see them in other places (the grocery store, funerals, etc., etc.) Some are just as precious as I remember. Often they will volunteer that they didn't want to leave, but had family pressure or just hated being in the middle of strife and I totally respect that.

Others will not even acknowledge my existence. That is very telling to me. Bitterness is hard road to walk. I don't think it is a coincidence that many of the ones who fall into this category have suffered a variety of physical problems in recent years. Yes, they are advancing in years and part of this would be natural and no, I am not saying this is a judgment against them... NOT AT ALL, but that the bitterness in their hearts is affecting their physical health and that is VERY sad.

I will say that, in my observation, the group of elders we have now is the most united and harmonious group I have observed since the early 1980s. God is good and HIS timing is perfect.

YTBH

 
 Respond to this message   
loveB
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"There is ONLY ONE HEAD at Madison unless I miss a bet."

August 12 2006, 5:56 PM 

If you prune 'em and tune them then they all look like Buck/ (Hee Haw). This is the crowd which got diverted with Don Finto and Rubel Shelly. I think there is only ONE mind up there.

Jimmy was probably the windmill TILTER when he began partnering with the Christian churches (Disciples as observers) to confess the divison (over instruments of course) and as part of the Christian church's gulping up of preachers as they did with Rubel.

The fact is that the Stoneites had their origin at Cane Ridge among an outbreak of witchcraft which sounds like fairly modern "christian" devil worship in Iraq. There was never any UNION other than some churches agreed to meet in the same building. Churches of Christ which existed in all ages never fell into this "awakening" and those who agreed to participate in the same buildings found the organ forced in and the owners forced out. J.W.McGarvey was refused the right to oppose the forced introduction of instruments in his own church. Because, they said (as they did at 4Gvn's hostile takeover) "that would SOW DISCORD."

You can peg the EGG LAYING when Madison teamed with Shelly for the Jubilee which must have been mid 1985-7(?) and the bonding with the Christian church was the motive of men like Rick Atchley, Shelly etal in AFFIRMING them. That would be as big a stretch as to bond with the Baptists.

There is ONLY ONE HEAD at Madison unless I miss a bet.

 
 Respond to this message   
INMATE3
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"... SEE IF IT MATCHES MY HYPOTHESIS."

August 12 2006, 6:00 PM 

"There is ONLY ONE HEAD at Madison unless I miss a bet."


LOVEB, I THINK I MAY AGREE. POST HIS INITIALS HERE AND I WILL SEE IF IT MATCHES MY HYPOTHESIS.


 
 Respond to this message   
loveB
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"... but it looks like a serpent. "

August 12 2006, 6:03 PM 

Can't do that but it looks like a serpent.

Did YOU ever see that fire chief outfit? That's still got me and the rest of the department puzzled.


 
 Respond to this message   
INMATE3
(no login)
65.1.218.199

"... AND YOU'RE RIGHT ON."

August 12 2006, 6:07 PM 

GOTCHA, LOVEB, AND YOU'RE RIGHT ON.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
65.1.218.199

Mt. Juliet congregation ... blessed ... to have Tory & family in the midst."

August 12 2006, 6:17 PM 

And who screamed "FIRE!!!"? Any other than the Fire Chief? The Chief had Nick Boone fired -- he wasn't the singy-clappy-Charismatic-enough kind of guy that could lead the young people to cheerleading-singy-clappy 7-11 "praise" songs and choruses. I would think it was the same Chief who had the leadership tell Tory Tredway [then youth minister] to seek opportunities somewhere else (putting that mildly) -- he was just too nice, too humble and too conservative for the rah-rah-rah kind of spirituality. (Fortunately, one elder from the Mt. Juliet congregation has spoken to me about how blessed the brethren have been to have Tory and family in the midst.)

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
65.1.218.199

Prune ... "the source/root of the upheaval"

August 12 2006, 6:21 PM 

Chuck,

You really like the word "pruning," don't you? Unfortunately, you have misapplied it. Go to the source -- the root -- of the problem. That's what should be pruned. And what's the source? It's not, as you claim, the Fire Chief screaming "Fire!!!" It was the implementation of certain thingies, some of which are the "Worship Leader" and his "Praise Team." That's exactly right -- the source/root of the upheaval. They're the ones that should be pruned.

Therefore, I submit that this is not Madison bashing. Madison is the victim of intrusion. There's a difference.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
66.169.189.53

To YTBH

August 14 2006, 12:15 AM 

I would just like to say that I did enjoy the way YTBH answered some of the questions that I ask. I did not direct the questions to her but she was kind to answer and she was kind in the way she answered.

In Christ,
Jimmy

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
199.227.205.202

More music at madison

August 15 2006, 5:07 PM 

Jill Phillips, Andrew Peterson
Saturday, September 30, 2006 (7:00 PM - 10:00 PM)

Madison Church of Christ
103 Gallatin Pike N.
Madison, TN 37115

Jill and Andy will play at Madison Church of Christ as part of a missions fundraiser.

Check out www.ebflo.com's home page for a new interview with Jill by husband Andy.... no, that is really not a joke.
**************

One of the replies to the up coming concert stated:

It has been a busy day at work, and I have wanted to say a couple of things on this thread, but have not had the time. In watching this thread, it has to be the fastest growing list I have ever seen on this site.

First, I do not have a problem with bake sales, car washes and other type of fund raisers (including concerts), especially for the youth group to use for missions or other good community projects. I do not see it any differently than how we would justify the use of the internet or television for spreading the gospel. It is a method that is readily available in our modern times. If someone wants to joyfully give of their time in baking cupcakes or washing cars and someone wants to joyfully contribute to a good work, then I see nothing wrong with it.

Now, from someone who has been there, I can tell you that this concert is one step down the slippery slope towards instrumental music in worship. For those of you not Church of Christ, you have seen that those of us that prefer not using instruments (including those that believe it is a sin and those that believe it is only a preference) that this is a very explosive topic. Many of us guard our tradition (doctrine) very carefully and are very proud of the way that vocal singing inspires us.

This concert is right out of the example book of Oak Hills. This will happen a few times, and then an alternative instrumental worship service will be offered not on a Sunday and so on and so on, until it becomes the norm on Sunday morning. If this is what the folks at Madison want, then they have the right to have it implemented, but they should know that this is the direction that they are headed.
********

In Christ,
Jimmy

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.152.96.36

YTBH, Stings Again

August 15 2006, 1:11 PM 

As usual, this creature who labels her/his self as YTBH has launched another attack against CM. Involved seems to be a man named "peck" Callgirl and ServantForHim.

It seems that they may have been involved with someone in the MILITARY in Cyprus to black list members of the church of Christ and outlaw any comments about Madison.

The "military" man in Cyprus may also have a plant at Jabez / Faithsite.

These people should understand that they are involved or have Incited a Federal Crime.

 
 Respond to this message   
Max Moon
(no login)
67.177.83.89

What?

August 16 2006, 5:55 PM 

Incited a Federal Crime?

David Matthews at lineoneweb said there were new moderators and no imposters.

How was there a federal crime?

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
66.82.9.81

??

August 16 2006, 10:23 PM 

Just to push a button, Max, like I learned so well from you.

The Wicked Witches of the Web are at it again: did you also whine like spider?

Pretty soon it will be just the Perpetually Desperate Housewives and a few chicks to carry on some really good bialog. "I am having a headache. Oh, I am having something worse."

I know the moderators don't read stuff (I am quite sure that the daughters of Zoe have taken over there also) so someone said that I used the word "penis." You remember the last howling was that Piney CURSED: quoted John Calvin to ask "why should the ploughing oxen starve and the lazy asses be fed?"

Any old excuse: the site has always been viperishly hostile to the church of Christ.

Whine? Maybe YTBH but MEN? Old YTBH started the downward spiral and now she is whining that SHE TOO got stuff removed. Bad vibes. It IS a debate forum and the GENDER odor will drive everyone away. Paul DID understand the nature of women?

 
 Respond to this message   
Max Moon
(no login)
67.177.83.89

Whiners

August 17 2006, 7:00 PM 

So you are complaining about the FEMALE whiners over at GCM, BRAGGING out about getting posts deleted?

So, then is Dr. Bill a FEMALE?

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
72.168.172.242

Speakers, Singers, Instrumentalists, Dramatists: HYPOCRITES.

August 20 2006, 4:22 PM 

Paul almost always DEFINES the pagan, perverted religions and the SUPERapostles trained from the Greek theater who were trying to take over the young church assemblies for their own profit. Paul had to denounce ANY support from Corinth as the ONLY WAY to MARK the robbers. All performance preaching, singing, playing, drama or ACTS intending to work some effect are OUTLAWED and specificially called HYPOCRITES and ROBBERS. It was of these MANY of whom Paul said: "IF THEY WILL NOT WORK NEITHER SHALL THE EAT."

There simply are NO Staff Infection Roles for an ekklesia or school of the Bible Jesus died for. He freed us from the BURDEN LADERS who use ANYTHING connected to sight or sound to PRETEND to give the Word of God extra power. In fact, no one with a degree in Bible is remotely capable to define SPIRITUAL SUPERIORITY which is the meaning of a PHARISEE.

The PLEASURING MEN spoke directly to all of the PERFORMING ARTS which the demagogues used to take people captive. Paul defines the TASK of all preachers which is to TEACH that which has been once for all times delivered. Secondly, it is not POSSIBLE to be faithful and use the MACHINERY of the hypocrites thinking to "further expound" the Word of God and thereby spit in the face of Jesus Christ.
    But as we were allowed of God
      to be put in trust with the gospel,
      even so we speak;
      not as PLEASING men, but God, which trieth our hearts. 1 Thess 2:4
This PLEASURING includes all of the performing arts of rhetoric, singing, music and drama.
    For neither at any time used we flattering words, as ye know, nor a cloke of covetousness; God is witness: 1 Thess 2:5

      [Gorgias: Socrates 463c] I assign rhetoric; but without noticing that I have not yet answered that, he proceeds to ask whether I do not consider it a fine thing. But I am not going to reply to the question whether I consider rhetoric a fine or a base thing, until I have first answered what it is; for it would not be fair, Polus: but if you want the information, ask me what sort of branch of flattery I assert rhetoric to be.
ALL actors, singers, musicians or speakers belong to the SECT of the Hypocrites:
    Hupokrinô reply, make answer
    2. expound, interpret, explain
    [outlawed by Peter as private interpretation] II. Att., speak in dialogue, hence play a part on the stage, be an actor, kômôidian, of orators and rhetoricians, represent dramatically, use histrionic arts, exaggerate,

    rhêtor-ikos , ê, on, oratorical, hê rhêtorikê (sc. technê). These are the craftsmen lumped with the singers, musicians and "grinders" doing merchandise in the house of prayer. Rev. 18:22

    Canto , I. Neutr., to produce melodious sounds (by the voice or an instrument), to sound, sing, play (class. in prose and poetry; rare in Cic.)
    2. Of the singing pronunciation of an orator , to declaim in a singing tone, to sing, drawl: si cantas, male cantas, si legis, cantas
    C. Hence, because the oracles were of old uttered in verse, of any mysterious, prophetic, or warning utterance, to predict, warn, point out, indicate, make known, say
    III. In the lang. of religion, as v. n. or a., to use enchantments, charms, incantations, to enchant, to charm,

Jesus pointed to Isaiah and also to Ezekiel 33 to identify the HYPOCRITES
    Ye hypocrites [actors, singers, speakers], well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, Mt 15:7

    This people draweth nigh unto me
      with their mouth,
      and honoreth me with their lips;
      but their heart is far from me. Mt.15:8

    But in vain they do worship me,
      teaching for doctrines
      the commandments of men. Matt 15:9 [songs, sermons, etal]
Ezekiel defines the SECTARIAN HYPOCRITES more fully:
    Also, thou son of man, the children of thy people still are TALKING against thee by the walls and in the doors of the houses, and speak one to another, every one to his brother, saying, Come, I pray you, and hear what is the word that cometh forth from the Lord. Eze 33:30

    And they come unto thee as the people cometh,
      and they sit before thee as my people,
      and they hear thy words,
      but they will not do them:

    for with their mouth they shew much love,
      (Lord, Lord as amorousness - inordinate love),
      but their heart goeth after their covetousness. Eze 33:31

    Indeed, to them you are NOTHING more
      than one who sings love songs (minstrel as a prostitute)
      with a beautiful voice
      and plays (make melody on) an instrument well,

    for they hear your words but do not put them into practice. Eze 33:32NIV

    When all this comes true--and it surely will--then they will know that a prophet has been among them." Eze 33:33

ALL people who use RHETORICAL SKILLS, sing, play instruments, clap or do anything to affect spiritual changed through EXTERNAL means are called hypocrites and in Revelation 18 John calls them SORCERERS.

Those who go to WATCH or LISTEN to any kind of religious performance are ALSO defined by Jesus as HYPOCRITES because the SINGING and MUSIC are the MARKS of people who have NO INTENTION to listening and obeying the WORDS of Jesus which are SPIRIT and LIFE. That is obvious to all but fools loving to be fooled.

 
 Respond to this message   
Jimmy Wren
(no login)
70.156.11.163

Re: U.B.

September 23 2006, 4:19 PM 

Brian, You mentioned singing 50 year old song a few post back and I replied that I wasn't sure about the ages of the songs. Last Sunday I made it a point to note the date that was printed by the songs we sang in the am service. Boy! Was I surprised!

The opening hymn:
1893 "Hallalujah, Praise Jehovah"
Next:
1921 "The Gospel is for All"
Next:
1831 "O For a Faith that will not Shrink"
Next - song before the Lord's Supper:
1350 composed in Latin; tr. to German; translated to English in 1830 "O Sacred Head"
Next - song before the offering:
1897 "Count Your Blessings"
Next - song before the lesson:
1887 "Will You Not Tell It Today"
Next - invitation song:
1944 "Zion's Call"
Next - dismissal song:
1916 "Let the Beauty of Jesus be seen in me"

Some of these songs may have actually been written earlier then the dates posted.

In Christ,
Jimmy

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
70.156.11.163

Re: U.B.

September 24 2006, 1:45 AM 

UB,
Your obsessive behaviour is disturbing..Elders come and go..youth ministers come and go..preachers come and go..worship leaders come and go...Relax..All of us are members of a congregation that has elders or leadership that don't always make decisions that pleases everyone...It's called normal..not something to make an exceptional event out of...

Goodness,I helped to make a decision to move the Lord's supper table to the back so that the men could sit with their family ...wow...I actually believe some left..but even years later it was still a hot topic..but it still remains that same way today..The elders gave their approval and that was that...

I think DR Phil would say that the root of the problem is not the worship style but an obsessive behaviour connected to it...However,who of us is not in some way in defiance of elderships...It's just normal...A lot of us defy authority but we don't create a website over it...

Please leave off the slander of my folks..For some reason,you do not make me mad,I suppose that I see in you my own weaknesses concerning corporate worship...I'm glad that you care so much and have a tender heart..My thoughts are that you live a life worthy of our Lord and have a lot of people who admire your faith..

God bless,Peck

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
70.156.11.163

Re: U.B.

September 24 2006, 1:51 AM 

[End of the online conversation]

Peck,

You keep bringing up extraneous things that have nothing to do with Madison -- the table, decisions don't always please everyone [common knowledge, he-he-he], folks come and go [common knowledge].

Just get to the point. The "Worship Leader" and the "Praise Team" -- these are issues that are splitting congregations, not just Madison.

Evidently, you're not concerned about troubles that CAN BE AVOIDED!!!! You're more interested in a [your] family member than church family members being alienated because of him. So, your own behavior is disturbing to me and to the church you still claim to be a member of.

U.B.

 
 Respond to this message   
Nadab
(no login)
70.252.56.154

You are right

September 24 2006, 5:16 PM 


Saying that music and praise teams are splitting churches is like saying that airplanes are what caused 9-11.

Someone did the hijacking and crashing. The issue of music and priase teams has led to some splits. You know why? Because when they are used, LEGALISTIC, REBELLIOUS, UNBIBLICAL, and UNGODLY people REBEL against God and His leaders.

His will is not all the junk that comes from the legalists. Jesus preached and preached and preached AGAINST that kind of stuff until he was tired.

Oh well, whether they repent and beging to do God's will or not, the important thing is, they are not winning. Coming to a congregation near you: INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC!!!! Get used to it.




 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - An Online Conversation with the “Worship Leader’s” Wife’s Dad
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

This web site is not part of or approved by any Church!

...........................THE BOOK

What Happened At the Madison Church of Christ?


There are thousands of churches being taken over across America.

This book is only about one of those churches. It's about the Madison Church Of Christ. By studying the methods used here along with the resource references you might be able to inoculate your church. At the very least you will recognize the signs early on.

Many of the current members of the Madison Church of Christ still don't know what happened.
Some never will know! This book is for them as well.

Madison Church of Christ was a 60 year old church. At one time it was one of the largest churches in the US, and the largest Church of Christ.

It thrived for many years on the vision of it's elders and those of it's ministers. Those visions undoubtably came from the the inspired word of Jesus Christ.

At sometime in the last 10 years there was a deliberate plan by a majority of the elders to take the Madison Church of Christ into a more worldly realm.

They used secrecy, covert planning, and outside sources to scheme and to change the format and direction of the Madison Church of Christ.

The Elders knew that the membership would never approve such a plan. Using the tools of the "Community Church Movement"(consultants, books, seminars, meetings,planters,seeders) they slowly started initiating change so it was never noticed by the members until it was too late.....

At the heart of the plan was the fact that old members were going to be driven off so new techniques could be used to go out and reach the unchurched through new "Contemporary Holy Entertainment" methods developed by the "Community Church Movement"

Old members had to be kept on board long enough to get their plans ready, or the funds would not be there to pay for the new building. So by the plans very nature, it had to be secret.

The church had no plan in effect to renew or approve elders. There was never any need. The elders had always been "as approved by God". 10 of the last 15 elders would begin to shed some doubt on that.

The Elders did not even need a majority at first, because some of the elders went along unwittingly.

This edition starts shortly after some of the members begin to smell something strange in January 2001. Later editions may go back and fill in some of the timeline.

To even start to understand whats happening here, you must read the background materials in the first of the book.

This is only the first edition, and not the end. New editions will be printed as needed. To keep abreast of current changes, please visit our web site; http://www.concernedmembers.com/madison

Here is the list of players;

5 Godly Elders
10 Not so Godly Elders
120 "Deacons" (allegiance unknown)
2,800 - 4,000 church "members"
2 "teners" (people who have publicly confessed to have broken all ten commandments)
Unknown number of "sinners" (This is what the 10 elders call us.)
Unknown number of "demons" (Flying everywhere, to many to count)
 

Click Here......The Book is Available Now FREE

Place your banner ad here.           See all banner ads

...ConcernedMembers.com ...About ...Links Library ...Sunday School in Exile ...Help Warn Others


FastCounter by bCentral