Place your banner ad here.          See all banner ads

|| ConcernedMembers.com || About || Links Library || Help Warn Others ||
|| Madison Church of Christ || Richland Hills Church of Christ || Hillcrest Church of Christ || More Churches || Sunday School in Exile ||

Where is my NewThisWeek Email subscription?Click Here

Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Did Christ in the Prophets MARK music as ANTI-Christian?

June 28 2010 at 1:00 PM
Ken Sublett  (no login)
from IP address 72.171.0.142

It is perfectly logical to MARK and AVOID those who understood that there is no role for "music" in the qahal, synagogue, ekklesia or synagogue because of a DIRECT COMMAND, universal history of the synagogue until 1815 and minimal common reverence when Christ comes to be our ONLY teacher when the elders "teach that which has been taught."

That's the way the devil always works: Jesus marked them as "speaking on their own." It would be reasonable for those building their Serf-like support team to lie as the postmodern views defends. However, these people were not required to be Bible readers or Christ-devoted to get "credentials" when Jesus warned that doctors of the law take away the key to knowledge: that is their predestinated role.


[linked image]
[linked image]
[linked image]


See Isaiah 50 which defines the PROPHESIERS whom Zechariah 13 says should be executed by their parents if the continue the MARKS after the SIGNS of Messiah and the apostles are completed.

http://www.piney.com/Isaiah.50.Smitten.Plucked.html

Isaiah 55 which commands you NOT to support them or you are guilty.

http://www.piney.com/Isaiah.55.html

And Isaiah 58 which OUTLAWS seeking your own pleasure or SPEAKING your own words.

http://www.piney.com/Isaiah.58.html


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Change Agent
(no login)
98.23.101.97

Re: Did Christ in the Prophets MARK music as ANTI-Christian?

June 30 2010, 12:21 PM 

You are a lunatic. Have you sought professional help, there needs to be an intervention.

 
 Respond to this message   
Concerned
(no login)
170.141.177.53

Christ did; the POPE did not.

June 30 2010, 3:20 PM 

And you are a change agent? Why don't you seek spiritual help? I'm sure you believe that Christ taught His disciples rah-rah-rah music when He said, "Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls" (Matt. 11:29).

Why don't you intervene with your rebuttal? You may need papal advice.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dave
(no login)
130.127.120.111

Sums It Up

July 8 2010, 10:53 AM 

Donnie, your reply to Change Agent sums up you, and all the others that take part in this witch hunt know commonly as Concerned Members. When you tell someone to seek papal advice it proves it. You aren't here to serve man in any way, or to speak the Gospel. You are here to promote trouble, whether that be among the brethren or outsiders. This site never will amount to anything because of this sinful attitude.
You need to become what you abhor......a Change Agent.
Just remember the biggest change agent of them all......Jesus Christ. He changed everything. Praise God for that! Praise God for the Sacrifice of Jesus.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(no login)
67.142.130.15

Jesus WAS the change agent.

July 8 2010, 12:43 PM 

Psalm 41 prophesied that Judas would fail in his TRIUMPH OVER Christ: this role was performed by the Levitical musicians but they too failed after musically mocking Him to the "foot of the old rugged cross."


[linked image]
The Judas Box is attached to the spotted flute case to the left. All male musicians of the Judas Type were perverted: the Ox goad is to hold them up because they were worshiping the new wineskin god.

Jesus CAST OUT the musical minstrels "like dung" so they could not be credited with any healing power.

Jesus consigned the Pipers, singers and dancers to the marketplace where all of the young boy 'chorus leaders' were used and abused.

He identified the end time Babylon mother of harlots in Revelation 17. In Revelation 18 she uses "lusted after fruits" as performing preachers, singers and instrument players. John calls them SORCERERS and consigns them to the Lake of Fire. The DOGS (Catamite, old style praise singers) Paul would not permit in their worship are also consigned to Hell.

It would not be a sign of CHANGE for the end time daughters of the Mother to OUT their hidden agenda: it's in the book and YOU are there to watch the end unfold.

 
 Respond to this message   
Concerned
(no login)
170.141.177.53

No ... it's seeking help

July 8 2010, 3:23 PM 

Dave,

Change Agent called the previous poster a "lunatic" in need to seek "professional help."

I thought the response to "change agent" and being advised to seek religious ["spiritual"] help would be appropriate.

The reference to the papacy was a "tongue-in-cheek" advice.

Change in itself is not abhorrent. But changing the teachings of Christ and His apostles is abhorrent. Just like "changing" the U.S. Constitution (in the political realm) by the left-wing liberals is not acceptable.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dave
(no login)
130.127.120.111

Two Wrongs Never Make a Right

July 9 2010, 9:49 AM 

Donnie, you said, when speaking to Change Agent, that "The reference to the papacy was a "tongue-in-cheek" advice."

It may have been advice Donnie, but it was advice from Satan. It was slander. Period. Change Agent is/was wrong to call anyone a lunatic, but you are no better than he/she for your comment.


 
 Respond to this message   
change agent
(no login)
98.23.101.97

Re: Two Wrongs Never Make a Right

July 9 2010, 12:18 PM 

If i need to apologize for using the term lunatic, i will. The definition of the word from Websters is a person whose actions and manner are marked by extreme eccentricity or recklessness. Seems to fit most of what Ken writes. I would only bold EXTREME in my characterization. There may be other definitions, that is the one i had in mind.

 
 Respond to this message   
Concerned
(no login)
170.141.177.53

Lunatic vs. lunacy

July 9 2010, 2:26 PM 

Change,

"Lunatic" is generally directed to a person whereas "lunacy" may describe a person's behavior, manner or actions. (Or, even writings.)

There's no need to apologize. You have explained what you meant.

 
 Respond to this message   
change agent
(no login)
98.23.101.97

Re: Two Wrongs Never Make a Right

July 9 2010, 12:26 PM 

I have never advocated the changing the teaching of Christ or his Apostles. I will further promise not to twist scriptures to make them seem to say something they do not. Much less will i use sources outside scripture as some kind of proof text to demonstrate the truth of what I believe. I really try to listen to those who disagree with me on what God's Holy word says or what it means. And i am always willing to consider my own position in light of what God's word says. I will be quick to admit i don't have all the answers much less know all the questions. But neither did those who came before me including those who physically walked and learned from Jesus himself. Peace
Change Agent

 
 Respond to this message   
Dave
(no login)
130.127.120.111

Note To Change Agent

July 9 2010, 1:58 PM 

Believe this, Change Agent, that Donnie Cruz (Concerned), Bill Crump, Ken Sublett, and the gang here doesn't allow the Truth to get in the way for a good character assasination. They never have. All this forum is, has always been, and always will be, is arms and legs for the evil one. I appreciate you, Change Agent, for having the courage to stand up against those who would try (KEY WORD=TRY) to water down the Truth.
Just don't allow these men here to bring you down to their level by getting you into a slander tirade. They feel as though they have won when they see you slander people. They are only hypocrites. They merely do the very same thing for what they accuse you of doing.

 
 Respond to this message   
Concerned
(no login)
170.141.177.53

Advocating Change

July 9 2010, 2:48 PM 

Change Agent,

ConcernedMembers did not initially come up with the expression "change agent." But it has become the accepted terminology to describe anyone who advocates radical changes to that which has long been established -- whether it is social, political or governmental, religious, etc.

We don't know you that well [not yet anyway], but we are a little surprised at how you've named yourself as a "Change Agent." In light of the accepted meaning of that expression today, i.e. Knowing now your willingness and interest in learning God's truth and in discussing doctrinal matters, and from your writings so far, you hardly fit that description -- as someone advocating changing the teaching of Christ and His apostles.

OK, then, let's all discuss religious matters and issues civilly.

Thanks for participating.

 
 Respond to this message   
Concerned
(no login)
170.141.177.53

What about three wrongs?

July 9 2010, 2:14 PM 

Dave,

"Seeking papal advice" was a facetious comment -- know that. No Christian would seek papal advice. Billy Graham would not do that. Not Al Maxey -- your spiritual guru. Certain cardinals and archbishops in the Roman Catholic Church might do so.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dave
(no login)
130.127.120.111

Concerned Members is Not of Christ

July 9 2010, 3:12 PM 

Donnie, your comment about me, of "Not Al Maxey -- your spiritual guru.", just cements the fact that you, nor this concerned member's site, are in it for the Love of God.

Luke 11
23"He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me, scatters.

Donnie, since you and this site aren't for Christ, then you are against Him....an agent of Satan.

 
 Respond to this message   
Concerned
(no login)
170.141.177.53

Al Maxey -- Friend or Foe of "The Cross of Christ"?

July 9 2010, 3:45 PM 

Dave,

Your doctrinal guru, Al Maxey, is one of the more prominent "change agents" in the brotherhood. He should be exposed to brethren and churches across the county and world for his "inconsistent teachings and irresponsible actions, including harsh, unfair, and unjust criticisms of others [the church, brethren and congregations].

The "Community Church Movement," including Al Maxey's participation, is "NOT OF CHRIST." His interest is in "revisioning" and transforming the church of Christ into being just like "the other [denomi]nations"; in rewriting the Restoration Movement history; etc.

And you are a disciple of Al Maxey, whether or not you are aware of it or you like it.


 
 Respond to this message   
Dave
(no login)
130.127.120.111

We Knew.....Now We Know

July 9 2010, 4:24 PM 

Donnie, when you speak of me and tell me "Your doctrinal guru, Al Maxey.....And you are a disciple of Al Maxey, whether or not you are aware of it or you like it.", again just speaks volumes of you and this site and the nature of this site.
It is not beholding to God nor His Son.

Oh, by the way, when you tell me that I may not like being a disciple of Al Maxey......I don't have to like it Donnie, because it's not so. I am a disciple of Christ, which makes you a liar.

 
 Respond to this message   
Concerned
(no login)
170.141.177.53

Not "a disciple of"

July 9 2010, 5:23 PM 

Dave,

It is not an impossibility to become a disciple of one leader or of another. You have quoted quite a bit from Al Maxey and his writings. He is undoubtedly one of the Restoration revisionists and one to go along with the religious societal flow. Just like Max Lucado, Rick Atchley, Rubel Shelly, et al, -- all having in common with Rick Warren, pastor of the Saddleback Community Church in CA.

These prominent change agents operating in the brotherhood are a destructive, divisive force in the body of Christ.

Is it a surprise that your affinity for the use of musical machines in the assembly is one of those ties that bind these change agents together?

No, I think not.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(no login)
207.65.229.27

The MARK (bite) of the BEAST

July 9 2010, 4:03 PM 

Li'l David play on yo harp: I have warned you that effeminate music in the "holy place" which would have gotten musicians slaughtered even in the most vile pagan temple IS the mark of the BEAST (ZOE).

While doing a collection of the baptism words and links to the document, something happened that left me more certain. When looking up the word "damned" promised to those who call Jesus a liar when He connected water baptism to the remission of sins so that WE have A holy spirit,

The word that just popped up is "Epi-triptos" which says in clear terms that the "beast" music is a sign of the DAMNED. Remember I told you that the Spirit Christ warned us that the MARK in sight and sound of God driving His enemies into hell was wind, string and percussioon instruments. These were the same ones Lucifer the singing and harp playing prostitute brought into the Garden of Eden when he/she/it was "cast as profane" (David's praise word) out of heaven.

http://www.piney.com/Isa30LXX.html

The word speaks of the "kinados" or the damned fox or wolves which are elders who let the "dogs" inside when Paul warned against it (Philippians 3). These are the "dogs" Paul left in the marketplace and silenced them in the holy place devoted SOLELY to the Word of God. They are signs of Bacchus or Dionysus worship being PROMOTED by the New Wineskins invasions. These ARE the beasts.

The are cursed Therion marked by drama or trying to use the HYPOCRITIC arts to define God or His Word. h mousik aei ti kainon thrion tiktei That means a NEW STYLE of song or drama. That could only happen where the music word means "to make the lambs dumb before the slaughter" or to "silence th voice of the victim." It was always called Sacred Violence. Of course the Purpose Driven Cult calls it 'holy entertainment."

More later, rain is taking me off the Sattelite.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dave
(no login)
69.59.106.52

What a Imagination

July 11 2010, 12:29 AM 

Ken,
Got to give you credit.....if nothing else, you have a vivid imagination. Not grounded on any of God's Truths, but yet great entertainment for Hollywood. Send some of your writings into some of the major TV networks. This is the kind of stuff that they only dream of.

 
 Respond to this message   
 
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

This web site is not part of or approved by any Church!

...........................THE BOOK

What Happened at the Madison Church of Christ?


There are thousands of churches being taken over across America.

This book is only about one of those churches. It's about the Madison Church Of Christ. By studying the methods used here along with the resource references you might be able to inoculate your church. At the very least you will recognize the signs early on.

Many of the current members of the Madison Church of Christ still don't know what happened.
Some never will know! This book is for them as well.

Madison Church of Christ was a 60 year old church. At one time it was one of the largest churches in the US, and the largest Church of Christ.

It thrived for many years on the vision of it's elders and those of it's ministers. Those visions undoubtably came from the the inspired word of Jesus Christ.

At sometime in the last 10 years there was a deliberate plan by a majority of the elders to take the Madison Church of Christ into a more worldly realm.

They used secrecy, covert planning, and outside sources to scheme and to change the format and direction of the Madison Church of Christ.

The Elders knew that the membership would never approve such a plan. Using the tools of the "Community Church Movement"(consultants, books, seminars, meetings,planters,seeders) they slowly started initiating change so it was never noticed by the members until it was too late.....

At the heart of the plan was the fact that old members were going to be driven off so new techniques could be used to go out and reach the unchurched through new "Contemporary Holy Entertainment" methods developed by the "Community Church Movement"

Old members had to be kept on board long enough to get their plans ready, or the funds would not be there to pay for the new building. So by the plans very nature, it had to be secret.

The church had no plan in effect to renew or approve elders. There was never any need. The elders had always been "as approved by God". 10 of the last 15 elders would begin to shed some doubt on that.

The Elders did not even need a majority at first, because some of the elders went along unwittingly.

This edition starts shortly after some of the members begin to smell something strange in January 2001. Later editions may go back and fill in some of the timeline.

To even start to understand whats happening here, you must read the background materials in the first of the book.

This is only the first edition, and not the end. New editions will be printed as needed. To keep abreast of current changes, please visit our web site; http://www.concernedmembers.com/madison

Here is the list of players;

5 Godly Elders
10 Not so Godly Elders
120 "Deacons" (allegiance unknown)
2,800 - 4,000 church "members"
2 "teners" (people who have publicly confessed to have broken all ten commandments)
Unknown number of "sinners" (This is what the 10 elders call us.)
Unknown number of "demons" (Flying everywhere, to many to count)
 

Click Here......The Book is Available Now FREE

Place your banner ad here.           See all banner ads

...ConcernedMembers.com ...About ...Links Library ...Sunday School in Exile ...Help Warn Others


FastCounter by bCentral

CM Visit Counter as of 6/25/2015
2,101,394

Site Visits Since 6/30/2015
page counter