Place your banner ad here.          See all banner ads

|| ConcernedMembers.com || About || Links Library || Help Warn Others ||
|| Madison Church of Christ || Richland Hills Church of Christ || Hillcrest Church of Christ || More Churches || Sunday School in Exile ||

Where is my NewThisWeek Email subscription?Click Here

Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>  

HISTORIC views of the Trinity: Frank Jamerson Blasphemy of Holy Spirit

February 20 2013 at 10:50 PM
Ken Sublett  (Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
from IP address 70.197.165.40

Frank Jamerson on Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit was offered as the non-institutional view of God as THREE PERSONS. He disputed saying that the NAME of the Holy Spirit is Jesus Christ but Scripture says that the another or changed Jesus Christ IS The Name of the Holy Spirit or MIND of Christ as in 1 corinthians 2

http://www.piney.com/Frank.Jamerson.Blasphemy.of.the.Holy.Spirit.html

Maybe we should unload the "new minister" thread although he/they undoubtedly think that the Spirit OF Christ is another POST-MODERN, POST-CHRISTIAN clear channel directly from God.

Men like C. Leonard Allen thinks that now that the MODERN views have been trashed (your godly ancestors and preachers before apostasy) we can look BACKWARD and understand God by looking at history.

http://www.piney.com/Trinity.Leonard.Allen.html

I don't consider any of these Bible Scholars or even Disciples because they don't believe the Word and therefore cannot understand it.

While Paul Tillich is not an authority, he does know when the neo-trinitarianism (ACU, DLC, Peppperdine) was spawned.

"There is much gnostic Marcionism in them, that is, a dualistic blasphemy of the Creator God. They put the Savior God in such opposition to the Creator God that, although they never fall into any real heresy, they implicitly blaspheme the divine creation by identifying it with the sinful state of reality.

Against this tendency Irenaeus said that God is one; there is no duality in him.
---Law and gospel,
---creation and salvation,
---are derived from the same God."
---(Tillich, Paul, A History of Christian Thought, p. 42)

"This God is never called a person. The word person was never applied to God in the Middle ages. The reason for this is that the three members of the trinity were called personae (faces or countenances): The Father is persona, the Son is persona, and the Spirit is persona. Persona here means a special characteristic of the divine ground, expressing itself in an independent hypostasis.

"Thus, we can say that it was the nineteenth century which made God into a person, with the result that the greatness of the classical idea of God was destroyed by this way of speaking... but to speak of God as a person would have been heretical for the Middle Ages; it would have been to them a Unitarian heresy, because it would have conflicted with the statement that God has three personae, three expressions of his being. (Tillich, Paul, A History of Christian Thought, p. 190)


    
This message has been edited by Ken.Sublett from IP address 70.197.164.23 on Mar 1, 2013 1:07 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
70.197.165.40

Re: Some HISTORIC views of the Trinity: never three PEOPLE

February 20 2013, 11:05 PM 

Thomas Campbell

http://www.piney.com/HsACTrin.html

Tertullian was the second to use the word TRIAS. There is no Biblical nor historical evidence to support the TRINITY which was infiltrated into Church of Christ Schools when avowed trinitarians were hired. H. Leo Boles invented a TRITHEISTIC or polytheistic view at DLC and it is still the foundation upon which preachers out of LU are built or dismantled.

All of the restoration scholars with Presbyterian roots as opposed to the Christian Churches out of the Methodists or Anglican or Catholic roots.

[linked image]
[linked image]


It IS a SALVATION ISSUE especially if you are on the DOLE of a Daughter Church which by definition means the Mother Harlot.

Besides, my research shows that those who latch onto the trinity view with Father-Son outdated by SPIRIT whom they can call down to LAND on the Musical Praise Teams. Whatever comes into their imagination--which God says is only evil continually--is the SPIRIT commanding them, for instance, to RESTORE the Worship of the STARRY host. The device of beginning as a SABBATH worship proves that it is of Apollo, Abaddon or Apollyon the SUN God worshipped on SATURN'S DAY. The Muses are in Revelation the LOCUSTS unleashed to separate those with different MARKS. They are pretty good at cause up to half of the owners to flee WITHOUT LOOKING BACK: that's a good sign.


    
This message has been edited by Ken.Sublett from IP address 70.197.165.40 on Feb 20, 2013 11:14 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Serious
(no login)
98.81.72.33

Re: Some HISTORIC views of the Trinity: never three PEOPLE

February 21 2013, 10:51 AM 

Which name would Jesus have you leave out?


++++++++++++++++++++++

Jesus Christ



Matthew 28:18-20

American Standard Version (ASV)


18 And Jesus came to them and spake unto them, saying, All authority hath been given unto me in heaven and on earth.

19 Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit:

20 teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world.

 
 Respond to this message   
B
(no login)
74.240.239.11

Re: Some HISTORIC views of the Trinity: never three PEOPLE

February 20 2013, 11:33 PM 

All this extra dialogue, when Jesus simply described the Holy Spirit as the Comforter and the Spirit of truth. That should suffice.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
70.197.160.201

Re: Some HISTORIC views of the Trinity: never three PEOPLE

February 21 2013, 11:31 AM 

Father, Son and Spirit are not names. God put ALL of the authority of the always- pagan FAMILIES of God into the man Jesus whom God MADE TO BE both Lord and Christ. Remember that John wanted to SEE the father as another "people." Notice that Peter and ALL of the Bible understands that name or FULL AUTHORITY (there is no other name). When Catholics baptized in THREE NAMES they logically baptized or sprinkled THREE TIMES. When people are mentally laded with loud singing of human compositions and spend their lives listening to sermons which DENIES Christ's full authority to speak for Himself, people lose the power to read the message hidden in clear view.

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
Serious
(no login)
98.81.72.33

Re: Some HISTORIC views of the Trinity: never three PEOPLE

February 21 2013, 5:50 PM 

Ken said: Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not names.

+++++++++++++++

Maybe this works for Ken?

Matthew 28:18-20 (Ken's version)


18 And Jesus came to them and spake unto them, saying, All authority hath been given unto me in heaven and on earth.

19 Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into "NO NAMES":

20 teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world.

 
 Respond to this message   
Donnie
(Login Donnie.Cruz)
ConcernedMembersMadison
99.177.250.192

Not NAMES -- Only One NAME

February 21 2013, 10:18 PM 

Ken is correct. Those are not NAMES [plural].

"In the NAME of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost" is SINGULAR -- one name only -- as I recall, the only time that SINGULAR NAME is mentioned in the Bible. The shorter NAME for that is simply "the name of the Lord Jesus Christ."

Let me count the number of times "the name of the Lord" or "the name of Jesus Christ" is mentioned in the New Testament:

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 ... 20,21,22 ... (OK, too numerous times to count). Just see for yourself: do a search on the expression "name of" and count the number of occurrences for me. And we'll record it here.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
70.197.160.201

Re: Not NAMES -- Only One NAME

February 21 2013, 10:35 PM 

Acts 4:10 Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
Acts 4:11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
Acts 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved

That is why salvation at baptism is not in the name of THREE PERSONS (people) but in the name (singular) of Jesus Christ.

The same people who have A spirit tell them that when God abandoned Israel to worship the starry host this NOW is God's command for Instrumental praise. That is clearly blasphemy and it is almost always accompanied by removing CHRIST from their public confession. That's what Jesus the Holy Spirit does when He visits for the last time and removes the LAMPS of spiritual knowledge (Rev 18)

I don't think you can even joke about that. Rubel Shelly had a joke where the Father God and the Spirit God tricked the dumber Son God into dying in their place.






 
 Respond to this message   
B
(no login)
74.179.246.219

Re: Not NAMES -- Only One NAME

February 21 2013, 11:22 PM 

Now the debate rages over whether God, the Son, and the Holy Spirit do or do not have "names," and what those "names" are. I'm sure He/They are all amused at this folly. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Donnie
(Login Donnie.Cruz)
ConcernedMembersMadison
99.177.250.192

Re: Not NAMES -- Only One NAME

February 21 2013, 11:46 PM 

But you're participating in the debate rage. happy.gifhappy.gifhappy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
B
(no login)
74.179.203.120

Re: Not NAMES -- Only One NAME

February 22 2013, 8:14 AM 

Maybe that's the eighth modern wonder of the world. happy.gifhappy.gifhappy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Serious
(no login)
98.81.72.33

How can God be three and yet one?

February 22 2013, 5:21 AM 

Donnie, that is the wonder of it all.

Read what Alexander Campbell said about it.


A. Campbell said:


"Into these relations to the Father, to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit we are immersed; for the Lord commanded the believers to be immersed into the name of the Holy Spirit as well as into the name of the Father and the Son. To be immersed into the name of the Holy Spirit, prepares for the enjoyment of this communion; as being immersed into the Father, introduces into the enjoyment of the love of God; and as immersion into the name of Jesus Christ, introduces us into the favor of the Lord Jesus. This love, grace, and communion are the superlative glory of the Christian institution. They are equally apprehensible, though in their nature and modes of development incomprehensible. It is the duty, honor, and privilege of Christians to enjoy all that into which they are immersed. There is as much wisdom or folly in disparaging the communion of the Holy Spirit, as in undervaluing the love of God or the favor of Jesus Christ."

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
70.197.165.40

Re: How can God be three and yet one?

February 22 2013, 11:48 AM 

The statement "Into these relations to the Father, to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit we are immersed" is what Jesus commanded but the name is singular. Based on his discussion with the baptists at

http://www.piney.com/Alexander.Campbell.Earnest.Spirit.html

He continues to say: He wished them a full fellowship, an equal participation of those measures of the Holy Spirit which belonged to the body of Christ as such

When we are baptized into the name (singular) of Jesus Christ we have all of the blessings of Father, Son and Spirit because Jesus bore "the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Colossians 2:9 For IN him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Colossians 2:10 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:


http://www.piney.com/AcCSPropX.html

Thus Peter was authorized to command those Gentiles to be immersed by the authority of the Lord, no man daring to forbid it.

But these gifts of the Holy Spirit, differed exceedingly from the seasons of refreshment, from the righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit, the common enjoyment of all who were immersed into the name of the Lord Jesus for the remission of sins.

Let it be noted here, as pertinent to our present purpose, that as the Apostle Peter was interrupted by the baptism of the Holy Spirit, when he began to speak of the forgiveness by the name of the Lord Jesus; so soon as he saw the Lord had received them, he commanded them to be immersed by the authority of the Lord. And here I must propose another question to the learned and the unlearned.

How comes it to pass, that though once and only once, it is commanded that the nations who believe should be immersed into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit;
.....and though we read of no person being immersed into this name in this way; I say, how comes it to pass,

that all sects use these words without a scruple, and baptize or sprinkle in this name;
when more than once persons are commanded to be immersed for the remission of sins, [Acts 2:38 3:19 22:16]






    
This message has been edited by Ken.Sublett from IP address 70.197.165.40 on Feb 22, 2013 11:50 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Serious
(no login)
98.81.72.33

Re: How can God be three and yet one?

February 23 2013, 1:01 PM 

"Into these relations to the Father, to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit we are immersed; for the Lord commanded the believers to be immersed into the name of the Holy Spirit as well as into the name of the Father and the Son."

A. Campbell

********************

1 + 1 + 1 = 1

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
70.197.160.201

Re: Some HISTORIC views of the Trinity: never three PEOPLE

February 21 2013, 12:04 PM 

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
70.197.160.201

Re: Some HISTORIC views of the Trinity: never three PEOPLE

February 21 2013, 6:21 PM 

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
Shing Taul Lau
(no login)
130.127.42.38

Jambalay, Crawfish Pie, Filet Gumbo

February 22 2013, 8:57 AM 

Donnie,
You need your old Pal here, Shing Tau Lau, to take some hits from B, for you?
Here if you need me.

Behave B!

Dave Fields, ConcernedMembers is incredibly irresistible to you, eh?

Just decide to get serious and use a serious user-ID (it does not have to be a photo) ... and we'll welcome you back (I think, maybe).


    
This message has been edited by Donnie.Cruz from IP address 99.177.250.192 on Feb 22, 2013 10:12 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
B
(no login)
74.179.245.132

Re: Jambalay, Crawfish Pie, Filet Gumbo

February 22 2013, 12:15 PM 

Everyone hide your jewelry! Dave's back! happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
70.197.165.40

There is no baptismal formula or LAW

February 22 2013, 5:19 PM 

There is no Baptismal Formula: when the preacher points one hand into the heavens (air) and one hand on the candidicate and says "I baptize you in the name of the Father, the son and the holy spirit" they are speaking a magical formula which gives power to the blood of Christ. At the same time they may deny that ALL AUTHORITY now rest in Jesus Christ the Righteous: the NAME of the "another" Paraclete or Comforter.

A proselyte and vocational baptism the candidate was asked "into whose name are you being baptized." For instance,

Acts 8:34 And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee,
.....of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man?
Acts 8:35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.
Acts 8:36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water:
.....and the eunuch said, See, here is water;
.....what doth hinder me to be baptized?


Notice that Phillip did not put words into his mouth:

Acts 8:37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest.
.....And he answered and said,
.....I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.


Philip did nothing more than take him down into the water, baptized him and brought up up out of the water

Acts 8:38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still:
.....and they went down both into the water,
.....both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.
Acts 8:39 And when they were come up out of the water,
.....the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more:
.....and he went on his way rejoicing.


1John 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God:
.....Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
1John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh
.....is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist,
.....whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

Acts 22:15 For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard.
Acts 22:16 And now why tarriest thou?
.....arise, and be baptized,
.....and wash away thy sins,
.....calling on the name of the Lord.


The Spirit Lord had to let Paul SEE and HEAR Him to qualify as an Apostle. Jesus of Nazareth in His Holy Spirit Form promised to guide Paul into all truth as the other Apostles.

Will they repent of their clerical arrogance? Of course not: they have the POWER in the PAW


    
This message has been edited by Ken.Sublett from IP address 70.197.165.40 on Feb 22, 2013 5:25 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Serious
(no login)
98.81.72.33

Then We Can Agree?

February 23 2013, 11:03 AM 

When we are baptized, by the authority of Jesus, we are baptized into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.


 
 Respond to this message   
 
< Previous Page 1 2 3 4 511 Next >
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>  
Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

This web site is not part of or approved by any Church!

...........................THE BOOK

What Happened at the Madison Church of Christ?


There are thousands of churches being taken over across America.

This book is only about one of those churches. It's about the Madison Church Of Christ. By studying the methods used here along with the resource references you might be able to inoculate your church. At the very least you will recognize the signs early on.

Many of the current members of the Madison Church of Christ still don't know what happened.
Some never will know! This book is for them as well.

Madison Church of Christ was a 60 year old church. At one time it was one of the largest churches in the US, and the largest Church of Christ.

It thrived for many years on the vision of it's elders and those of it's ministers. Those visions undoubtably came from the the inspired word of Jesus Christ.

At sometime in the last 10 years there was a deliberate plan by a majority of the elders to take the Madison Church of Christ into a more worldly realm.

They used secrecy, covert planning, and outside sources to scheme and to change the format and direction of the Madison Church of Christ.

The Elders knew that the membership would never approve such a plan. Using the tools of the "Community Church Movement"(consultants, books, seminars, meetings,planters,seeders) they slowly started initiating change so it was never noticed by the members until it was too late.....

At the heart of the plan was the fact that old members were going to be driven off so new techniques could be used to go out and reach the unchurched through new "Contemporary Holy Entertainment" methods developed by the "Community Church Movement"

Old members had to be kept on board long enough to get their plans ready, or the funds would not be there to pay for the new building. So by the plans very nature, it had to be secret.

The church had no plan in effect to renew or approve elders. There was never any need. The elders had always been "as approved by God". 10 of the last 15 elders would begin to shed some doubt on that.

The Elders did not even need a majority at first, because some of the elders went along unwittingly.

This edition starts shortly after some of the members begin to smell something strange in January 2001. Later editions may go back and fill in some of the timeline.

To even start to understand whats happening here, you must read the background materials in the first of the book.

This is only the first edition, and not the end. New editions will be printed as needed. To keep abreast of current changes, please visit our web site; http://www.concernedmembers.com/madison

Here is the list of players;

5 Godly Elders
10 Not so Godly Elders
120 "Deacons" (allegiance unknown)
2,800 - 4,000 church "members"
2 "teners" (people who have publicly confessed to have broken all ten commandments)
Unknown number of "sinners" (This is what the 10 elders call us.)
Unknown number of "demons" (Flying everywhere, to many to count)
 

Click Here......The Book is Available Now FREE

Place your banner ad here.           See all banner ads

...ConcernedMembers.com ...About ...Links Library ...Sunday School in Exile ...Help Warn Others


FastCounter by bCentral

CM Visit Counter as of 6/25/2015
2,101,394

Site Visits Since 6/30/2015
page counter