Place your banner ad here.          See all banner ads

|| ConcernedMembers.com || About || Links Library || Help Warn Others ||
|| Madison Church of Christ || Richland Hills Church of Christ || Hillcrest Church of Christ || More Churches || Sunday School in Exile ||

Where is my NewThisWeek Email subscription?Click Here

Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Church Singing II

June 23 2016 at 5:46 PM
Rancor  (no login)
from IP address 68.74.186.218



The moderators of this forum no longer believe in vocal singing in the Church. What do you think?

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Church Singing II

June 23 2016, 7:16 PM 

This Moderator Speaks where the Bible SPEAKS and keeps Silent where the Bible doesn't SING. Tyre (Lucifer) and Jerusalem (Sodom) went into the same 70 year abandonment.

Is. 23:15 And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre [As LUCIFER]
.....shall be forgotten seventy years,
.....according to the days of one king:
.....after the end of seventy years
.....shall Tyre SING AS A HARLOT .


How does a harlot sing? Notice that it takes three words to sing + harp + melody

Is. 23:16 Take an harp,
.....go about the city,
.....thou HARLOT that hast been forgotten;
.....make sweet [1] melody,
.....[2] sing many [3] songs,
.....hat thou mayest be remembered.


Of the Lord, Lord sayers, Prophesiers meaning singers and players claiming powers, Jesus said GOD DOESN'T EVEN KNOW YOUR NAME.

Is. 23:17 And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years,
.....That the LORD will visit Tyre,
.....and she shall turn to her hire,
.....and shall commit fornication
.....with all the kingdoms of the WORLD upon the face of the earth


Now, to be fair, your time to fin an example of God calling His people out of their REST to engage in congregational singing with or without instruments.




 
 Respond to this message   
Bill
(no login)
74.179.13.108

Re: Church Singing II

June 23 2016, 7:53 PM 

Congregations will continue to sing hymns until Judgment Day, regardless of what the CM moderators think and say. I've yet to see anything in the New Testament that promises damnation to those who sing hymns.

The CM moderators have their own personal, often bizarre theology and "shout down" all who disagree with them. Therefore, we should not waste our time with them.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Let God do the shouting: no one will be able to her.

June 23 2016, 8:40 PM 

The Prophets as THE teaching resource along with the prophecies made more certain by Jesus of Nazareth and left for our memory were inspired by the Spirit or Breath of Christ. Breath is used to snare people who think that their vain imaginations is A spirit speaking to them.

If Christ identifies Tyre as Melkart or Lucifer worship and calls it the SONG OF THE PROSTITUTE why do you suppose that people use that as their PATTERN for "worship" when Jesus died to ordain a School of His Word only?

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Let God do the shouting: no one will be able to her.

June 23 2016, 10:14 PM 

Why doesn't our Threader find Biblical or early church history connecting singing to the Assembly prophesied and empowered by Jesus Christ?

How does any belief or practice alter the Biblical Text which has been protected for all of these years and attacks?

 
 Respond to this message   
Rancor
(no login)
68.74.186.218

Church Singing II

June 24 2016, 9:00 AM 



Do the moderators of this site believe any and all tuneful vocal Church singing is wrong/evil in the local church of Christ?

 
 Respond to this message   
Keb
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Church Singing II

June 24 2016, 9:35 AM 

WE -- ME decided that WE as disciple only believe what ME can read in Scripture: I quote others to see what they thought about SCRIPTURES.

Remember what I said: Jesus said He SPEAKS what HE hears from the Father. The sons of the Devil DO what they hear from their father.

DO is that LEGALISM word.

Don't Judge God Who IS SPIRIT by what WE DO. Then, we can ALL just get alone and give our money to the suffering.


    
This message has been edited by Ken.Sublett from IP address 184.63.180.96 on Jun 24, 2016 9:38 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Rancor
(no login)
68.74.186.218

Re: Church Singing II

June 24 2016, 9:51 AM 


Donnie dropped you and you got a new name? happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Church Singing II

June 24 2016, 10:17 AM 

Now, isn't that spooky. I think I did it to myself. When I try to look at Wineskins.0rg they FREEZE my computer. Now, doesn't that frost you in all of the wrong places?


    
This message has been edited by Ken.Sublett from IP address 184.63.180.96 on Jun 24, 2016 10:19 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Rancor
(no login)
68.74.186.218

Re: Church Singing II

June 24 2016, 10:38 AM 


Now Keb, you know Jimmy Joe will call you out if you have a pocket rocket! Classic!

Now don't get up early on my account, Donnie is paying our Social Security.happy.gif I'll think take a nap!


 
 Respond to this message   
Bill
(no login)
74.179.62.141

Re: Church Singing II

June 24 2016, 10:38 AM 

The moderators have a difference of opinion about church singing. Donnie sees nothing wrong with singing hymns that are not performance-and-culture-driven. Yet because he continually and strongly emphasizes that the NT says to "speak" hymns, he leaves the contradictory impression that hymn-singing is wrong. So he seems to be perpetually confused on that point.

In Ken's opinion, on the other hand, all forms of music and hymn-singing in church are wrong and should be abolished.

The bottom line: churches of Christ are not likely to drop hymn-singing any time soon. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Church Singing II

June 24 2016, 1:25 PM 

Donnie came here west-to-east: I came here east-to-west.
Donnie nor I picked the same wife.
Donnie is smarter but I am more persistent.
Donnie is kind and I am dogmatic.
Neither are so low that we would "upset your comfort zones" so you can pay us to expose our eternally-marked persona of self-exhibitionists.

My 95 year old mother didn't agree with me either: she enjoyed singing, I found it disturbing and wasteful of Jesus Time.
Donnie may be structured so that the factual-discording of complex harmony is enjoyable: I am one of the massive majority who are afflicted with Ahedonia.

That's why this forum just "lets Jesus do the talking" without focusing on what WE DO for that one hour a week. That way you can do your own thing and I can do my own thing.

Matt. 25:13 Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.
Matt. 26:40 And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter,
What, could ye not watch with me one hour?


 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Church Singing II

June 25 2016, 9:36 PM 

Recorded history knows of no "singing" in any form before the fourth century after Constantine began paying the poor priests.

Hastings. Encyclopedia.Religion.Ethics.html
There was also an early vigil from cockcrow to dawn kept by 'all MONKS and virgins,' and by some lay-folk also. Of course the devotions at the central holy place of Christendom were more generally attended than elsewhere and more elaborate in form, including already four daily services at least. But the account gives us clear insight into the way in which worship became more specialized and developed. And by a good deal of evidence from the last quarter of the century we can ' fix the period A.D. 350-375 as that of the introduction of daily public evening and morning prayers into the Eastern Church, followed a few years later by that of Milan.'1

As regards forms of devotion dating from the 4th cent., neither the morning hymn (Gloria in exceltis) nor the evening one,1 tor instance, seems then to belong to public service. The former appears in varied contexts (e.g., after the Biblical Canticles or 'Odes' in the Codex Alex.); and in the Eastern Church it is part of the Daily Office (Lands), while in the Western it is in the Mass— whither most prized forms tended to gravitate. Once, however, both perhaps were part of the worship of an ascetic community.

The eveninghymn, like another vesper hymn, ' Hail, gladdening light', referred to by St. Basil1 as already ancient, may originally have been a thanksgiving 'at the lighting of the lamps' either in the home or at an Agape,' passing later into use among ascetics, like the table-prayers of the Didache into de Virg. xii f. In this last the Gloria is part of the virgin's praise ' towards dawn.'* Closely connected in feeling and ideas with the Gloria, and perhaps with its fellow vesper hymn (Te deeet laiu), is the best known Latin hymn, the Te Deum, now traced to Nicetas of Remesiana, who as living on the road between the East and West would naturally feel the influence of Greek models. Nicetas in his works ' On Vigils' and ' On the good of Psalmody' illustrates further the similarity of ideals of private and corporate devotional hours in East and West c. A.d. 400 ;4 and he was one of the pioneers of the newer feeling which allowed hymns other than those in Scripture, the Psalter above all, to form part of corporate Christian worship, though the prejudice against this died hard.' The authority of St. Ambrose, who himself wrote hymns for public worship, had no doubt great influence. The musical difficulty to their more general use was a real one. It was in monastic circles, then, that hymns proper took real root, and from their daily offices passed in the later Middle Ages into the Breviary of the ordinary clergy.


This clergy occupied the "church house" all day long because they like modern STAFF believes that they have to keep contact with the "gods" on behalf of the laity which did not attend these "make works" for the new clergy who came in from being evangelists or "poor priests." History repeats and repeats if you let the idlers get access to the feed trough.

If you read the scholars during this period you will find that singing had little to nothing with the public assembly: Like "harmony" when the MONKS had time to fiddle around with the newly-imposed but simple organs.

That does not prevent ALL of the latter day preachers from proclaiming that Churches of Christ REMOVED musical instruments simply because they were ignorant, southern red-necks. "MUSIC" or poetry IS DEFINED in the Greek text as LYING because the poetic persona whines about what it would be if HE-SHE had written Scripture.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Church Singing II

June 26 2016, 10:38 PM 

Schaff§ 19. The Abolition of the Roman Worship. 1524.

Bullinger, I. 173 sqq. Egli, 234 sqq.

By these preparatory measures, public opinion was prepared for the practical application of the new ideas. The old order of worship had to be abolished before the new order could be introduced.

The destruction was radical, but orderly. It was effected by the co-operation of the preachers and the civil magistracy, with the consent of the people. It began at Pentecost, and was completed June 20, 1524.

In the presence of a deputation from the authorities of Church and State, accompanied by architects, masons and carpenters, the churches of the city were purged of pictures, relics, crucifixes, altars, candles, and all ornaments, the frescoes effaced, and the walls whitewashed, so that nothing remained but the bare building to be filled by a worshiping congregation. The pictures were broken and burnt, some given to those who had a claim, a few preserved as antiquities. The bones of the saints were buried.

Even the organs were removed, and the Latin singing of the choir abolished, but fortunately afterwards replaced by congregational singing of psalms and hymns in the vernacular (in Basle as early as 1526, in St. Gall 1527, in Zurich in 1598)

"Within thirteen days," says Bullinger, "all the churches of the city were cleared; costly works of painting and sculpture, especially a beautiful table in the Waterchurch, were destroyed. The superstitious lamented; but the true believers rejoiced in it as a great and joyous worship of God." 103

103 I. 175. Bullinger justifies the abolition of church music (which took place in the Grossmunster, Dec. 9, 1527) with St. Paul' objection to the unintelligible glossolalia without interpretation (1 Cor. 14:6-9). He must, of course, mean the chanting of a choir in Latin. The Swiss Reformed churches excel in congregational singing.


Isn't it pitiful that people spend so much money and sow so much discord and HINDER the Word by claiming that GOD COMMANDED singing AND playing instruments? While they kept you busy this morning you could be meeting to PREACH the Word by READING the Word. Maybe almost everyone is a Slave of the Watchtower and need DEPROGRAMMED.

 
 Respond to this message   
Dianna Howell
(Login dianna01)
107.77.68.114

Church Singing II...my 2 coppers worth

June 27 2016, 4:34 PM 

The older generation wants to hold on to the songs they grew up with.
The younger generation wants new songs they can relate to.
The elders try to accommodate both groups by only adding a few songs for the younger generation.
The older generation must bend if they don't want discord in the assembly.
The next generation will want new songs too. Get ready to bend younger generation.
The owl generation sitting there wondering what's going on, never knowing there had been changes brewing.
The poster, who was a part of the older- owl generation, started paying attention to the changes.
The poster only wants to do the will of the Father, as I'm sure some others do too.
The poster has a suggestion: instead of trying to please ourselves, take all songs away that are not
Scripture. Then there will be no more fighting on who gets a say on what will be
Included in the song book. This way Jesus Christ is the referee and teacher then we can learn
the bible and the will of the Father at the same time.


By the way, I also love some of the old songs that are no longer sung. I sing them while I am by myself, but I would rather have scripture imbedded in my mind. I didn't realize the turmoil had been brewing for many years on the music issue. If something causes this much heartache and strife, then the simple solution is to remove it, and start over.

 
 Respond to this message   
Donnie Cruz
(Login Donnie.Cruz)
ConcernedMembersMadison
23.127.32.146

Re: Church Singing II...my 2 coppers worth

June 29 2016, 5:19 PM 

Thanks for the message, Dianna.

There's a good lesson we can learn from the following post/thread by Dr. Bill Crump (October 9 2004 at 1:38 PM:

The Cost of "Praise" (Contemporary) Services

One of my friends, who is an organist for a local church in Nashville, emailed to me an anecdote that he found on a pipe organ web site. The subject is "Happy Clappy vs. Traditional Organ." While organ music has no place in the C of C, the story nevertheless is thought-provoking:

"Dear List: One of our [organ technician's] recent visit to a local church gleaned the following information which I'm sure will be of interest here. This local church has 3 Sunday services, the first and third a praise band service and the middle service a traditional service with organ. Each of the praise services brings in many more people into the pews than does the traditional service. The good news is that the traditional service brings in more money than the combined two praise services. Obviously the people vote with their hands and not their wallets. Perhaps it is a matter of time before churches realize the cost of the praise services and return to traditional services."

This story confirms what I've heard for several years: In general older, traditional members (including those who are retired and on social security) contribute more to the church coffers than do the throngs of younger members who pile in for contemporary services. One would think that larger numbers of contemporary members would produce larger contributions. That's apparently not the case. These latter folks show up for the unbiblical "fun" and entertainment provided in contemporary services, but they are not as willing to cough up the cash to keep things going. So the financial burden falls primarily and unfairly upon the minority of older traditionalists, many of whom are living on limited incomes.

Determined that they were not about to leave, what would happen if the traditionalists simply withdrew financial support from their unbiblical church? The minister, song leader, and church staff would take a whopping cut in salary, or perhaps be laid off entirely. After all, this is where at least half or more of most church funds go in the first place (I could give you the name a large church that had a $750,000 annual budget, nearly 50% of which went to local in-house "salaries," yet less than 1% went to "benevolence"; the rest went to "building and grounds," "music ministry," "TV ministry," "miscellaneous," and some to "missions").

There's no biblical justification to finance that which is blatantly unbiblical. Perhaps traditionalists should consider twisting the old adage "Money talks" into "Lack of money screams."

 
 Respond to this message   
Donnie Cruz
(Login Donnie.Cruz)
ConcernedMembersMadison
23.127.32.146

Re: Church Singing II...my 2 coppers worth

June 29 2016, 5:51 PM 

Here's another great message from Dr. Bill Crump (August 7 2004 at 10:57 AM):
"Blended Service" Just a Transitional Ploy

Most of us are probably familiar with the old fable about the Arab and the camel. I'm sure there are variations to the story, but it runs along this line: As an Arab slept in his tent in the desert, his camel stood outside in the cold night air. In time, the camel pleaded for the Arab to let him put just his nose inside, because it was so cold outside, and the Arab granted this wish. Soon, the camel pleaded to put just his face inside, which really wouldn't take up any room at all, and to this the Arab also agreed. Then the camel followed with consecutive, but subtle, requests which included his neck, his right foot, his left foot, his front legs, his shoulders, and his waist. Eventually, the camel ever so gradually managed to ease more and more of himself into the tent, so that finally the camel occupied the entire tent, and the Arab had been displaced outside to the cold night air. I think you can see how this analogy applies to change agents who gradually infiltrate traditional churches.

A common ploy used to transform traditional churches into bastions of the unbiblical Change Movement is to introduce the so-called "blended service," which gradually and progressively blends worldly, contemporary elements (rock music, drama, skits, etc.) with traditional worship. But make no mistake in believing that services in such churches will always remain "blended." The vast majority of such churches are only in "transition," for as the camel worked his entire body into the tent, the change agents intend for the contemporary to supplant and replace the traditional completely. The process could take years to accomplish, because all workings must be subtle and gradual.

Here's a case illustration. In previous posts, I've told my story, that I was formerly an organist for nearly four years at a once-traditional Southern Baptist church in Nashville. Some two years into my post there, the thirty-something pastor brought in a contemporary rock band to perform during the services, and their participation at first was limited to one Sunday morning per month. After all, the old traditionalists could only tolerate the ear-splitting cacophony of crashing drums, screeching guitars, and vocal acrobatics for short periods. This was the pastor's decision alone, and the congregation had not been consulted beforehand. When challenged about his decision, the pastor bristled and ordered that the congregation must learn to appreciate ALL musical styles, because (in his biased opinion), "God loves diversity."

This scenario went on for a year or so, then the rock performances increased to two Sunday mornings a month and included one, then two Sunday nights a month -- you get the drift. And the choir, which had theretofore sung traditional pieces, began to drift to more contemporary songs as well, for the minister of music was under the pastor's thumb. Soloists also sang contemporary pieces designed to show off their vocal acrobatic skills, and from time to time, drama and skits appeared during the services. On one occasion, teenage girls performed a dance routine with hand signs to recorded music, which supposedly told a "Christian" story. So I left that changing, entertainment-oriented church, as I've noted earlier. Services there now are almost exclusively contemporary, although a few traditional hymns still appear from time to time. The transitional ploy of a "blended" service has virtually given way to full metamorphosis. But the crucial point of the story is that all this gradual, contemporary change served as a prelude for the church to pursue Rick Warren's "40 Days of Purpose" study in August-September of 2004. Again, instead of consulting the congregation, the pastor successfully railroaded the final "change" element into his church.

All too often, biblically illiterate, spiritually lazy church goers rely on their pastors/ministers to supply all of their spiritual needs, when in fact their trusted "shepherd" could be plotting a major coup, as I've shown above. Only by being biblically literate and ever-watchful will traditional churches be successful in keeping the Change Movement from their doors.


 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Re: Church Singing II...my 2 coppers worth

June 29 2016, 6:20 PM 

Even worse, they mock the "purple hairs" and it was once reported that they held prayer services for the weeping widows to move on or demise "because it is our time to rule." They attract spiritual butterflies who would be fools to PAY you for silly praise singing when they can lift all of the music they want from the internet. The DEMISERS whine about the DEMISE of churches of Christ and like an addict rather than turning around they just increase the dose. That predestined pattern is well documented because music may be much more addictive than any drug: music INDUCES a tub of junk like endorphins which induce Fight, Flight or a sexual impulse. It is compared to the runner's high".

Eph. 5:19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord;

Lŏquor , cātus (quūtus), lŏqui (
I. inf. loquier, Naev. ap. Gell. 1, 24, 2), v. dep. n. and a. [Sanscr. lap-, to talk, whisper; Gr. lak-, elakon, laskō], to speak, talk, say (in the lang. of common life, in the tone of conversation; cf. Quint. 9, 4, 10; 11, 3, 45).

Dianna may have the correct meaning: people learn best when they learn to set their school lesson to music and SING TO THEMSELVES.

 
 Respond to this message   
Donnie Cruz
(Login Donnie.Cruz)
ConcernedMembersMadison
23.127.32.146

Re: Church Singing II...my 2 coppers worth

June 29 2016, 8:05 PM 

I forgot all about the "purple hairs." happy.gif

But I haven't forgotten about those "silly praise songs," as well as some of those erotic songs.

"Oh, I was made for this to know your tender kiss ... to know this love is mine ... you gave me everything. My feet were made to dance.... You give me more and more, for I was made for you.... You ran to welcome me, I felt your warm embrace.... I was made to love you Jesus. I was made for this." Oops! "Jesus" is mentioned.

"SPEAKING TO YOURSELVES [TO ONE ANOTHER] IN ... HYMNS...."

There are those who think that the author(s) misspoke. They say that it should be:

"SINGING TO YOURSELVES [TO ONE ANOTHER] IN ... HYMNS...."

 
 Respond to this message   
Ken Sublett
(Login Ken.Sublett)
ConcernedMembersMadison
184.63.180.96

Jeff Walling Daring to Dance with "god"

June 29 2016, 8:50 PM 

"Oh, I was made for this to know your tender kiss ... to know this love is mine ... you gave me everything. My feet were made to dance..

http://www.piney.com/Jeff.Walling.Dares.to.Dance.With.God.html

God's Child (Dance With Me)
(Hey - Hey - Hey - Hey)
(Ho - Ho - Ho - Ho)
Who calls this child to walk on her own?
(Hey - Hey - Hey - Hey)
Who leads her down this treacherous road?
She's dancing to a song we can't hear
(Hey - Hey - Hey - Hey)
Ooh, come on down
Ooh, ooh, ahh, ahh
Ah, set me free (I want to be free) ha!
Come dance with me (dance with me)
Ooh, ahh, with me



 
 Respond to this message   
 
< Previous Page 1 2 3 Next >
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Place your text ad here.           See all text ads

This web site is not part of or approved by any Church!

...........................THE BOOK

What Happened at the Madison Church of Christ?


There are thousands of churches being taken over across America.

This book is only about one of those churches. It's about the Madison Church Of Christ. By studying the methods used here along with the resource references you might be able to inoculate your church. At the very least you will recognize the signs early on.

Many of the current members of the Madison Church of Christ still don't know what happened.
Some never will know! This book is for them as well.

Madison Church of Christ was a 60 year old church. At one time it was one of the largest churches in the US, and the largest Church of Christ.

It thrived for many years on the vision of it's elders and those of it's ministers. Those visions undoubtably came from the the inspired word of Jesus Christ.

At sometime in the last 10 years there was a deliberate plan by a majority of the elders to take the Madison Church of Christ into a more worldly realm.

They used secrecy, covert planning, and outside sources to scheme and to change the format and direction of the Madison Church of Christ.

The Elders knew that the membership would never approve such a plan. Using the tools of the "Community Church Movement"(consultants, books, seminars, meetings,planters,seeders) they slowly started initiating change so it was never noticed by the members until it was too late.....

At the heart of the plan was the fact that old members were going to be driven off so new techniques could be used to go out and reach the unchurched through new "Contemporary Holy Entertainment" methods developed by the "Community Church Movement"

Old members had to be kept on board long enough to get their plans ready, or the funds would not be there to pay for the new building. So by the plans very nature, it had to be secret.

The church had no plan in effect to renew or approve elders. There was never any need. The elders had always been "as approved by God". 10 of the last 15 elders would begin to shed some doubt on that.

The Elders did not even need a majority at first, because some of the elders went along unwittingly.

This edition starts shortly after some of the members begin to smell something strange in January 2001. Later editions may go back and fill in some of the timeline.

To even start to understand whats happening here, you must read the background materials in the first of the book.

This is only the first edition, and not the end. New editions will be printed as needed. To keep abreast of current changes, please visit our web site; http://www.concernedmembers.com/madison

Here is the list of players;

5 Godly Elders
10 Not so Godly Elders
120 "Deacons" (allegiance unknown)
2,800 - 4,000 church "members"
2 "teners" (people who have publicly confessed to have broken all ten commandments)
Unknown number of "sinners" (This is what the 10 elders call us.)
Unknown number of "demons" (Flying everywhere, to many to count)
 

Click Here......The Book is Available Now FREE

Place your banner ad here.           See all banner ads

...ConcernedMembers.com ...About ...Links Library ...Sunday School in Exile ...Help Warn Others


FastCounter by bCentral

CM Visit Counter as of 6/25/2015
2,101,394

Site Visits Since 6/30/2015
page counter