<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Macro lighting?

February 18 2003 at 10:50 PM
  (Login hjreggel)

 
Hello,

this is the next question after the question about close-up lenses.

What's the best way to get proper illumination in extreme macro-shots?

Do these ultra-bright LEDs have a continuous spectrum? I think spectrum continuity would be a question for Bryan "The Minolta God" Biggers
IIRC, Nikon offers a ring fitted with LEDs behind an opaque ring as macro light source.

Are the Minolta Ring Flash or Twin Flash Sets any good? I think I've also seen opaque rings where you can place your subject in the middle and light that from the outside with studio flash equipment.

Hans-Jürgen

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login PeteGanzel)

Macro Light Guide Fourth Prototype

February 19 2003, 1:01 AM 

Well Hans,

You seem to be thinking along the same lines I am a lot lately.

I have tried LEDs mounted in a ring. But even with 16 of the most powerful white ones I could find (8500mcd I think), I still needed 1/8- 1/30 sec exposure at f/9.5, so I couldn't hand hold the camera. That's really my goal, The D-7 is such a wonderful light camera, it's a shame to put it on a tripod. It's also much easier to shoot living things outdoors if you can hand hold the camera.

So, I've been tinkering with this for the last two months;





This allows me to shoot at any shutter speed stopped down to f/9.5 for maximum depth of field.

Lighting is pretty even, without that creepy hospital look that a diffused ring flash gives (there are some specular highlights).




I'm going to add some LEDs to aid in focusing in the dark.


Good Luck,

Pete





    
This message has been edited by PeteGanzel on Feb 19, 2003 4:53 AM
This message has been edited by PeteGanzel on Feb 19, 2003 1:05 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Rolf
(no login)

Very clever.....

February 19 2003, 1:43 PM 

Pete! Must have been very difficult bending that hot acrylic to such exact dimensions. I like you thinking, seems like you have come up with a very workable solution. By the way where did you get the square acrylic rods? ......... Rolf

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login hjreggel)

Indeed

February 19 2003, 8:18 PM 

Hello,

I'm very impressed, too. That's exactly what we need here.

I'd like to know more about the construction, too.

Hans-Jürgen

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login PeteGanzel)

Hot Acrylic

February 20 2003, 5:15 AM 

Sounds like a XXX movie about manicurists...

The acrylic rods are heated one at a time with an air gun and bent around a foil covered wood mandrel thats sort of shaped like the camera;



The most important part is not overheating (causes bubbles).

The mount is made from 2" PVC conduit that is turned on the inside with a custom made lathe tool to cut the
ridge that fits the exterior lugs on the camera;

"

It fits on the camera with a quarter turn, the camera can be zoomed and used normally with the flash closed.

A myriad of Acrylic shapes is here;

http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/category.asp?catalog_name=USPlastic&Category_Name=Sheet,+Rod,+Shapes&Page=1

Good Luck,

Pete






    
This message has been edited by PeteGanzel on Feb 20, 2003 5:57 AM
This message has been edited by PeteGanzel on Feb 20, 2003 5:26 AM


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login rudagray)

Nice setup, EVF rubber piece?...

February 19 2003, 4:19 PM 

How much did it cost to make, and would you consider making some others for purchase?

As my EVF rubber peice has recently began to come loose, I see that you have something different on yours, just wondering what it is exactly, and maybe where to get.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login PeteGanzel)

26 cents a foot

February 20 2003, 5:42 AM 

Dave:

Actually a couple of dollars, the material costs more to ship. It does take me about an hour or so to turn one out, with making the mounting and all. The mandrel is made so I could produce some, but they need to look a little better, maybe with a little practice. If you want some of the first ones, I'll charge maybe $30, later,$50. The ones with socketed LEDs will need to be around $80-$100. Any special configurations?

The eyecup I use is from a RCA VHS videocam that I bought junk for some parts for a few dollars. It is really nice, helps viewing and focusing , I don't know why Minolta doesn't make a proper eyecup, complaints about the EVF would be reduced.

Good Luck,

Pete

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login rudagray)

Thanks for input...

February 20 2003, 4:03 PM 

I may take you up on the under $50, with knowing exactly what I am getting, unless someelse here does first, but I am still experimenting myself. I was thinking about a flash softbox attachment(I think that is what they are called) to put on my external flash which has a slave trigger attached and use the Minolta Flash on 1/16 or 1/4 to trigger.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login PeteGanzel)

Macro Diffuser

February 21 2003, 7:02 AM 

Dave:

You are probably thinking of something to attach to the camera, but diffusers can be pretty simple as shown here;

http://photographytips.com/page.cfm/336

I use something similar (actually a plastic ice cream bucket with a hole cut in the bottom) to shoot the jewelry my wife makes. I do exactly as you were thinking, slaving a flash unit from the side with the camera flash on 1/16th.

Good Luck,

Pete

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login brachiopod)
Forum Owner

White LEDs

February 19 2003, 1:06 AM 

I don't know about that! Yes, they do have a continuous spectrum, but there is often a color bias which you can work around. Here is a link to a light curve. I think that Nikon even sells a macro light that uses white LEDs. Bryan
http://ledmuseum.home.att.net/ledwht.htm

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login PeteGanzel)

What's the Workaround?

February 19 2003, 4:42 AM 

Bryan:

At least with the White LEDs I'm using, that blue spike is really strong. I can't get it to white balance with the camera. Adding a little red just makes it a little maroon. It looks OK on most subjects but when shooting for example, white paper, there is a color cast. I suppose you could subtractively filter, but there goes your brightness..

He He, the beauty of editing..

Good Luck,

Pete


    
This message has been edited by PeteGanzel on Feb 19, 2003 5:41 AM


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login browntimdc)

Pulsed white LEDs?

February 19 2003, 7:03 PM 

The LEDs could be pulse driven at higher power in sync with the shutter. This would make handholding more feasable. For the tinkerer there is the advantage of no HV circuitry. 555 timers to the rescue!


    
This message has been edited by browntimdc on Feb 19, 2003 7:14 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Minolta Macro Flashs

February 19 2003, 2:32 AM 

Hans

I have both the ring flash and the twin flash.

The ring flash gives extreme detail but since there
are NO shadows, the pix look a bit "flat".

The twin flash is the most versatile flash I have
ever used/seen. It has 2 arms that can be moved to
almost anywhere, i.e. above/below/45 deg/90degrees.

Also each head can be tilted up/down.

For macro I use the twin for most everything.

Dan Browning

 
 Respond to this message   
TomM
(no login)

Ring Flash

February 19 2003, 2:45 PM 

Doesn't the Minolta ring flash let you turn the 4 tubes on and off independently? (the older one did) If so, can you get good shadows that way?

Tom M.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Pictures made with both types of flashes

February 19 2003, 7:21 PM 

Hi all!

If you would like to see some samples of pictures made with the Twin Flash you could have a look at http://www1.photosig.com/photos.php?cameraId=1717
Some images made with the Ringflash R1200 can be found at http://www1.photosig.com/photos.php?cameraId=2107
I agree the Twin Flash provides excellent results and IMHO is really the best macro flash available. The Ring Flash comes more to its own right when photographing from really short distances ie. with strong close-up lenses attachted to the 7's zoom. The larger the distance of the object from the Ring Flash the flatter the lighting.
Hope this helps!

Jan Humble

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login hjreggel)

Ring flash diameter and reach

February 19 2003, 8:27 PM 

Hello,

I learned that the twin flash is more flexible regarding the positioning of the two flash units. Especially in order to work with any add-on lens.

I think that the length and diameter of the add-on lens might be important when using the ring flash. What diameter and which additional length can the add-on lens have for 200mm focal length? Will the ring flash work with an inverted 50mm lens?

Hans-Jürgen


    
This message has been edited by hjreggel on Feb 19, 2003 8:28 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

Attachment of ring flash

February 19 2003, 10:23 PM 

The ring flash can be attached onto a 49 mm thread. You can utilise all sizes of close-up lenses in use with a suitable stepping ring. A reversed 50mm lens could only be used provided you could find and adapter ring to convert the bayonet fitting to say a 49mm thread. I'm not sure if these exist.
Regards,

Jan Humble

 
 Respond to this message   
Steve
(Login d5)

Re: Macro lighting?

February 20 2003, 1:38 AM 

this is my set up for macro.bulky but works
great.



This shot was taken with it.


 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Ruan)

Re: Re: Macro lighting?

February 23 2003, 8:54 AM 

How did you trigger the remote flash?
Ruan

 
 Respond to this message   
Steve
(no login)

Re: Re: Re: Macro lighting?

February 23 2003, 8:58 AM 

With a wein slave trigger.I'm going to buy a small cheap flash, and use that instead of my vivitar 283 ( its too heavy) Or maybe two, one on each side.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Macro lighting?
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2010 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement