Welcome to the Net's only forum devoted to Securitization and structured finance issues. Here you are welcome to post your views, questions, deals or simply thoughts about securitization markets and products.
The forum is unmoderated, but general rules of decency and relevance apply and we have a right to remove whatever postings we consider should not remain on the Forum, without assigning reasons.
While commercial messages on securitisation are permitted, do not waste your time in putting irrelevant money-making schemes, as I am anyway going to delete them.Do not forget to be back home to Vinod Kothari's Securitisation web site..
Also visit a Forum devoted to Leasing. Click here.
Wincentive Corporation - Advisery Firm For Tax Recovery
Taxes are usually collected by a governmental agency such as the Internal Revenue Service in the United States or HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in the UK. When taxes are not paid to a government's satisfaction, penalties such as fines, forfeiture, and imprisonment are carried out against the non-paying entity or individual. These penalties are also typically carried out by a governmental agency, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the US. In most modern industrialized countries, when an individual fails to pay his government the taxes that government demands of him, it will ultimately result in his imprisonment at the hands of the state. Wincentive Corporation is a tax consulting firm that specializes in tax recovery services for businesses operating in California Enterprise Zones.
We provide the labor intensive processing and expertise required for our clients to claim California Enterprise Zone Tax Incentives.
For more information visit Wincentive Corporation
Posted on Aug 21, 2006, 9:36 AM from IP address 202.63.227.38
With the new laws coming out everyday there is little room left for companies to avoid the consolidation issue in case of SPV.
However from my expert friends I will like to know what are the ways available wherein SPV is created for RMBS and the issue of consolidation can be avoided.
Thanks in Advance
Posted on Aug 13, 2006, 1:56 PM from IP address 87.236.48.196
The bottom line is, as far as the courts are concerned, the creation of SPV must be established as a TRUE SALE. In order to avoid consolidation, you need to watch out for a lot of stuffs, including, but not limited to the ownership percentage held by the originator, name, address etc. of the SPV, establishment, legal documentation and counseling..etc.
Pete G.
www.eSecuritization.com
Posted on Aug 14, 2006, 4:44 AM from IP address 68.50.223.119
We would like to do a private issue of MBS, or mortgage backed bonds. I am having trouble determining the best structure due to the fact the underlying loans will not be static because they are primarily bridge loans. We want to offer fixed interest rates over fixed time intervals. Could we accomplish this through a covenant in the bond? Any idea of where we can find some similar language that has been used before? Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Matthew
Posted on Jul 14, 2006, 6:54 PM from IP address 67.67.86.84
I saw some information regarding revolving pool MBS on www.eSecuritization.com
Also, I cannot remember off the top of my head, but there is a book, authored by Fabozzi and someone else that provides a detailed discussion on this. Just go to Amazon.com and search for revolving collteral MBS.
Thanks.
Pete
Posted on Aug 1, 2006, 2:44 AM from IP address 68.55.164.156
How would a company hold the residual value of the securitizations on the balance sheet, or do we even record iton the balance sheet?
Would you value the restricted cash (in the case you have overcollaterlization requirements) or the projected residual cash flow
In the case where you have overcollaterlization requirements (restricted cash) does the company need to pay taxes on the income or wait until the restricted cash flows back to the company.
HELP PLEASE THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on Jun 27, 2006, 5:22 PM from IP address 63.80.201.210
انا باحثة دكتوراه فى التوريق واريد الحصول على نسخة من ذلك الكتاب ممكن العنون القاهرة /محافظة قنا /نجع حمادى /قرية القمانة /عزبة حماد
ت/0965531055/0106825108
Posted on May 18, 2006, 9:20 PM from IP address 82.201.156.204
Private insurers compete not by offering better healthcare, but by avoiding high-risk individuals, limiting services for those they do cover, and, whenever possible, shifting costs to other payers or to individuals in the form of high deductibles and copayments. It's a chaotic and fragmented system that requires a mountain of paperwork, which is one reason premiums are so high.
If this system is left essentially intact, as it is under the new plan, expanding coverage will inevitably increase costs. That is common sense: Coverage and costs have to move in tandem if the system stays the same. Furthermore, the plan does nothing to keep costs from growing. For years, premiums have been rising much faster than the consumer price index. At current rates, even if the state were able to cover its proposed contributions to the plan at launch, it wouldn't be able to keep up with soaring prices.
The only answer is to change the system entirely, so that we can expand coverage while controlling , ''The old single-payer canard is gone." No, it isn't. Sooner or later, that is exactly what we'll need if we're really serious about healthcare.
We Save You, Time & Money
Health insurance shopping service has helped millions of consumers find the affordable insurance coverage they need by doing their insurance shopping for them. Let us help you, too!
seeking counterparties to trade in structured bonds, the bonds have reference index's that use swaps, 30 year swaps minus 10 year swaps, etc or 30 year minus 2 year.
If you have access counterparties please contact at iprog20002002@yahoo.Com
Posted on May 17, 2006, 4:31 PM from IP address 82.123.10.32
securitization specialist in trade receivable scarce in the US
by
(no login)
I am interested in a professional that knows the securitization market in the US - specifically that I can recommend to our international client interested in trade receivables. I would value a recommendation to a company and/or professional provider
Posted on May 1, 2006, 9:17 PM from IP address 207.13.120.194