When looking at the Net54 Postcard website they break down the 12 cards issued in this series. They state that the card entitled "It's All in The Game-NOISE" pictures "Reds manager Pat Moran". When doing a google search on Moran it states that in 1907 he would have been playing for the Cubs and wasn't the Reds manager until 1919 (beat the Sox in the BlackSox scandle). So, does this card really picture Moran, or someone else.

Thanks-
Claude

Ned Hanlon was the team's manager in 1906-07. Is it possible it's him? I don't recall ever seeing him in uniform as a manager, though ... if not Hanlon, could it be another image of Huggins? I compared the two images and there is a resemblance ...

Here is a link...what do others here think??

link: http://vintageball.com/RedBelt.html

Here are the two images (from the website)....they do look similar to me.

Anyone got any insight on this? I dont think the image can be Moran based on the fact he was playing for the Cubs at the time of issue.

-Claude

Anyone have any insight on this???

Claude,

I'm the guy who made the Red Belt identifications (concurrently on Net54 and the VintageBall site). The Moran mention simply was a mistake -- plain and simple.

Of course, it was interesting to see the SCD Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards pick up all the identifications and add them to their checklist (including the mistake). And...since they took all the info from these IDs (and others on VintageBall) without attribution or a credit in the acknowledgements, they get to take credit for the mistake as well!

It's been corrected on VintageBall.com.

Also, I agree it does resemble Huggins, but who knows?

Robert,

Are you aware of any variations in the Red Belt Series? BTW, Excellent work on the website. It's been a bookmark for a couple of years.

Claude, The guy in the white has smaller ears and smaller spikes

Great looking set.

Thanks for the help guys.

Robert - I enjoy your vintageball web site - but as to the cabinet card with one of the players ID'd as Chauncey Fisher (it's not clear which one is supposed to be Fisher) - neither is Fisher.

And and as to the Bradley vs Stahl controversy - there should be none as it is Bradley.\