Net 54 Vintage Baseball Card Forum
Hello to all visitors! Please visit the NEW Net54 board at www.Net54baseball.com You can directly contact the moderator here if you have any questions or comments. Enjoy!
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Top of page | Bottom of page | Main Index  

Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy (unnecessarily) revisited

March 17 2009 at 9:17 PM

  (Login bmarlowe1)

This post revisits a disussion that originated on 5/08:
http://tinyurl.com/ca8sam

[linked image]
[linked image]

And - the ears don't match.


    
This message has been edited by bmarlowe1 on Mar 17, 2009 11:55 PM
This message has been edited by bmarlowe1 on Mar 17, 2009 9:46 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
PC
(Login PC-T206)

Re: Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy revisited

March 17 2009, 9:50 PM 

The head angles are not exactly the same. In the picture on the left, he is looking slightly up, which would account for the ear appearing lower than the ear in the right picture.

 
 


(Login bmarlowe1)

Re: Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy revisited

March 17 2009, 10:06 PM 

The head angles (you are referring to nodding) are virtually the same - within a few degrees (you can see nostrils in both photos), and nowhere near enough to account for the large difference in ear height.



    
This message has been edited by bmarlowe1 on Mar 17, 2009 10:11 PM
This message has been edited by bmarlowe1 on Mar 17, 2009 10:09 PM
This message has been edited by bmarlowe1 on Mar 17, 2009 10:08 PM


 
 


(Login slidekellyslide)
Network 54 Moderator

Re: Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy revisited

March 17 2009, 11:12 PM 

The player identified as "Field" is actually Michael Joyce.

[linked image]

 
 


(Login bmarlowe1)

that's too easy

March 17 2009, 11:19 PM 

What's funny is I could have saved some artwork time since I have that same pic of Joyce in the 1907 Spalding Guide.

Nice find Dan.

 
 

(Login rhettmyeakley)

Re: Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy revisited

March 17 2009, 11:30 PM 

Mark, thanks for bringing up the old thread that makes me look bad! (joking)

A few weeks after posting the initial thread I was able to put Joyce and "Field" together (I corrected myself in the later one), please read below...

http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/thread/1215477306/E254+%26quot%3BField%26quot%3B+Identification+--+%28Revisited%29

-Rhett

 
 


(Login bmarlowe1)

Rhett - you look OK to me

March 17 2009, 11:50 PM 

Rhett - I didn't make you look bad - I made my thread searching skills look bad. You did find the right answer in the end.

Anyway here's Montreal 1906, including Joyce and Honus' brother.

[linked image]

 
 

(Login rhettmyeakley)

Re: Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy (unnecessarily) revisited

March 18 2009, 12:03 AM 

Mark, actually, I am very glad you posted that picture because I have been looking for a photo of "Butts" Wagner to compare to the 1898 Cameo Pepsin pin of the Toronto team that I have.

Butts made one of his first minor league stops in Toronto and I wanted to see if he was pictured on the Toronto item below. From the crappy photos I could find he looked "the most like" the guy in the very middle (right above Arthur Irwin's head). Let me know what you think in regard to the 1897 Toronto team pictured on the 1898 Cameo Pepsin pin.

[linked image]

-Rhett

 
 


(Login bmarlowe1)

Re: Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy (unnecessarily) revisited

March 18 2009, 1:16 AM 

Rhett,

I'm sure I don't see him on your pin (nice scan).

Here's my only other image of Albert Wagner, from the '03 Providence team composite -
[linked image]

 
 

davidcycleback
(Login dereb12)

Re: Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy (unnecessarily) revisited

March 18 2009, 3:13 AM 

If George had played for the Red Sox instead of the Indians, he would have been the Boston Starnagle.

 
 
Current Topic - Starnagle not - Colgan contoversy (unnecessarily) revisited  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Top of page | Bottom of page | Main Index