Bush won because of christian heresies? That kind of crap doesn't even deserve consideration.
First off, who's defining the heresy? The catholics? This guy on his own? The very idea of some group's imaginary beliefs being more wrong than some other organization's is laughable in the extreme. Second, the attributizations this guy makes are suitable for a Michael Moore documentary. If Bush won the election, it isn't because of Jesus Land's (though that is a hilarious term) need to engage in another crusade. That kind of thinking is delusional, hysterical, and ultimately a complete disservice to otherwise intelligent people.