Re: Program was rejectedJuly 4 2011 at 9:13 AM
No score for this post
|Viktor Coldvein |
Response to Program was rejected
Dude that's real neat. Not a keen follower of Vision 2050 but i could see they got some real good planning goin' on out there. I had my trust in Professor Kavanamur, been one of his students, i've learnt alot from his experiences and i know they can do it; unfortunately i'll be 60 by then,hehe.
Just a thought, the nations 35 years old and another 40 years will get her up to 75. By then, with the resources, GDP and everything, im hoping we'll be well off.
Building infrastructures is one part of it, maintenance of these infrastructures is another bigger part of it. After all these things are in place, im hoping the task force do have some plans as to how they can effectively distribute on going goods and services (maintenance programs) to these 89 districts as well as effectively linking these posts to the major cities. That way we ain't got students in remote districts stranded for papers or hospitals stranded for medical supplies or roads and bridges waiting forever for shipments.
It's a good thing to build point A and point B but it's also completely proper to link the two points together. Hence given the geographical challenge, this LINKING MEDIUM is in question.