> If that is the case, can we
> multiply a person's vote by the number
> of years he or she has not seen Paete?
I second the motion, Angel. I think that is a good idea. If anyone has any objection to this motion, please let us know. If we don't hear any objection, I'll consider it a sign of approval from the members and will send an email to all survey participants to indicate the number of years they've been away. I will also revise the Survey Questionnaire to include this question.
I would also suggest that if after July 31, the chosen date of the survey participants would not command 50% of the total votes, then a second ballot be conducted with the choices limited to the first two dates in the first ballot. Any seconder to this motion? Any objection?