Return to Index  

Re: Fetishes

August 29 2007 at 8:48 AM
  (no login)


Response to Fetishes

 

Yes, I used the word "preference" because I think mine are things I like rather than fetishes per se. Certain types of lingerie and bras are a turn-on, but it depends (for me) upon the woman wearing them. The wrong woman in the right attire still isn't that enticing.

When I was younger, I was really into boobs -- bigger generally better (though I've never cared for the huge sloshy type). As I got older, I still liked boobs, but my attention shifted elsewhere. I came to appreciate the beauty of legs, butts, abs as well. I've always liked pretty faces, nice hair and clear skin. I find that different women have different strengths, so there isn't one make-or-break attribute, so again I would say I don't have fetishes. (For me, I tend to prefer short women -- current gf is 4'10" . . . though 5'6" wouldn't bother me at all)

One more thing. I think it is breast size relative to the rest of the body that is key. A very slender woman (e.g., Paris Hilton) looks fine with small breasts, while a more full-bodied woman needs a larger set to look impressive (note that Playboy magazine during the latter 70's and into the 80's -- prior to all the breast implant girls since the early 1990's -- had a number of Playmates with average to smallish breasts. The girls were so petite that B's or small C's were still impressive). Maybe it comes down to those evolutionary theories, that men choose mates (for reproduction) who have positive chest-to-waist ratios, as this correlates with increased fertility.

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Re: Fetishes - Nat on Aug 29
    1. Re: Fetishes - mackayla on Aug 29
      1. Semantics - Nat on Aug 29
     
Find more forums on SocietyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2013 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement