Return to Index  

Re: Hypocrisy

June 5 2010 at 8:40 AM
No score for this post
Nat  (Login Nafana)
Owner
from IP address 76.101.173.62


Response to Re: Hypocrisy

 

A few generations ago women's legs and ankles were considered "too sexual" to be seen in public. Women had to wear high button shoes and long dresses that hung to the floor. Now we see women's legs and ankles all the time- so the fact that something is considered "too sexual to be seen" is a arbitrary and changeable thing. Many European beaches (and even a few here in America) permit women to go topfree and society has not collapsed as a result.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Re: Hypocrisy - Brandon on Jun 5, 2010
    1. Exposable - Nat on Jun 6, 2010
      1. Aesthetics - Bob on Jun 6, 2010
        1. What is "nudity"? - Nat on Jun 7, 2010
          1. Re: What is "nudity"? - Brandon on Jun 8, 2010
            1. Re: What is "nudity"? - Nat on Jun 8, 2010
              1. Re: What is "nudity"? - BlueTrain on Jun 10, 2010
                1. Re: What is "nudity"? - Nat on Jun 10, 2010
                  1. Re: What is "nudity"? - BlueTrain on Jun 10, 2010
                  2. "Envelope-pushing" - Nat on Jun 10, 2010
                  3. Changes - Bob on Jun 11, 2010
                  4. Re: Changes - BlueTrain on Jun 11, 2010
                  5. Instruction - Bob on Jun 11, 2010
                  6. Re: Instruction - BlueTrain on Jun 11, 2010
                  7. Tans & grades - Nat on Jun 11, 2010
     
Find more forums on SocietyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2017 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement