Return to Index  

UHF

March 16 2011 at 11:01 PM
  (Login Nafana)
Forum Owner


Response to I cannot find it

 

Well I don't see that link but there is plenty to poke through on that sight.

I know the list of early defunct UHF stations is very long because very few survived before cable became wide-spread.

UHF equipment was primitive and inefficient. TVs had poor UHF sensitivity and transmitters were unstable and inefficient. I worked at a U in the 1960s, we pulled 200-KW off the AC line to get 30KW into the coax. By the time it got to the antenna it was down to 18-kw and half the people in the city didn't know the station even existed.

Ironically, now 50 years later- with Digital-TV, UHF is where all the stations want to be because it works the best with digital.

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Re: UHF - Brandon on Mar 16
    1. Ode to the past - Nat on Mar 17
      1. Re: Ode to the past - BlueTrain on Mar 17
        1. Automated robots spooning pablum - Nat on Mar 17
        2. WLOH - Nat on Mar 17
          1. Re: WLOH - BlueTrain on Mar 17
            1. Local kids shows - Nat on Mar 17
              1. Re: Local kids shows - Balto48 on Aug 2
                1. Satellites - Nat on Aug 2
      2. Channel 79 - cool beans boi on Mar 20
        1. Repeaters - Nat on Mar 20
          1. Repeaters - cool lbeans boi on Mar 20
            1. Re: Repeaters - Nat on Mar 20
    2. RE: UHF - Balto48 on Aug 2
      1. Re: RE: UHF - Nat on Aug 2
     
Find more forums on SocietyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2013 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement