Return to Index  

Put another way

March 25 2012 at 10:33 AM
  (no login)


Response to Question

 

If I grew up in a predominantly Muslim country, but was not a Muslim myself, would I have a problem if the money had "In Mohammed We Trust" on it? Probably not.

1) I grew up with money having that inscription, so it wouldn't be foreign at all to me, even though I don't subscribe to that faith. I don't usually look at money that closely and would probably forget what was on it, as I do now.

2) If I weren't forced or pressured to adopt the Islamic faith and were free to choose to believe or not as I wished, the fact that I am surrounded by adherents to that faith and their practices would not threaten me -- to each their own.

3) If, as in U.S., the laws of that country were not too closely tied to religious teachings, I would abide by the laws there as I do here (note that there are many things in U.S. that are unethical to do -- not what a Christian should do -- but yet are still legal).

4) Despite exceptions to the contrary, the teachings of most major religions support mostly positive behaviors that are good for societies and good for individuals. Honesty, loyalty, sincerity, industry, self-sacrifice, compassion for and service to others. What is not to like, whether it be my particular faith or that of another?

Not only wouldn't I have a problem in that situation, I wouldn't try to denigrate and deny the predominant faith in this hypothetical country, unlike some in U.S. who have imposed their will on our Christian majority. I call what they do "intolerance".

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Hypocrisy - Nat on Mar 25
    1. Re: Hypocrisy - Bob on Mar 25
      1. Re: Hypocrisy - Nat on Mar 25
        1. Ok, I don't think it is necessary - Bob on Mar 25
          1. Nomenclature - Nat on Mar 25
            1. Can we agree? - Bob on Mar 26
              1. Money costs- time to go cashless - Nat on Mar 26
                1. Re: Money costs- time to go cashless - Tubby on Apr 1
                  1. Re: Money costs- time to go cashless - Nat on Apr 1
                    1. Re: Money costs- time to go cashless - Tubby on Apr 2
                      1. Re: Money costs- time to go cashless - Nat on Apr 2
    2. Re: Hypocrisy - BlueTrain on Mar 26
      1. Re: Hypocrisy - Nat on Mar 26
        1. What changes would be next? - Bob on Mar 26
          1. Ridiculous - Nat on Mar 26
            1. Care to respond? - Bob on Mar 29
              1. Re: Care to respond? - Nat on Mar 29
        2. Re: Hypocrisy - BlueTrain on Mar 26
          1. Re: Hypocrisy - Nat on Mar 26
            1. Indeed.... - Marseil on Mar 26
            2. Judge a man by his acts - Bob on Mar 29
              1. Protecting minorities - Nat on Mar 29
                1. Not Protecting, but Dictatorship of the Minority - Bob on Mar 29
                  1. Balancing act - Nat on Mar 29
                  2. Majority - minority - Marseil on Mar 30
                    1. False Presumption - Bob on Mar 30
                      1. Majority surrepresentation? - Marseil on Apr 5
                        1. Are majority wishes always sinister? - Bob on Apr 5
            3. Re: Hypocrisy - BlueTrain on Mar 29
              1. Creeds - Nat on Mar 29
                1. Re: Creeds - BlueTrain on Mar 29
                  1. Re: Creeds - Nat on Mar 29
     
Find more forums on SocietyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2013 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement