Respond to this messageReturn to Index
Original Message
  • Explain This
    • (no login)
      Posted Jun 30, 2009 12:23 PM

      It seems to me that if everyone in Iraq, including the insurgents, wanted U.S. out of there ASAP, then why did they keep fighting? U.S./Coalition forces only stayed this long because the country was destabilized by all the fighting. Had there been no fighting post-Saddam, the Bush Administration and every country that sent troops there would have been glad to have proclaimed "Mission Accomplished" and left. Then, with the Coalition forces largely gone, those intent upon toppling the fledgling government could have then started bombing, shooting, etc. U.S. and others could always return, but think of having to re-mobilize all the vehicles and equipment as well as the troops back into a place -- a lot more work, and maybe the countries wouldn't care to bother going back in. Am I missing something, or does it seem that the enemies of a free Iraq WANTED the U.S. and others to remain there?
    Login Status
  • You are not logged in
    • Login
      Password
       

      Optional
      Provides additional benefits such as notifications, signatures, and user authentication.


      Create Account
    Your Name
    Your Email
    (Optional)
    Message Title
    Message Text
    Image Services Photobucket.com
    Options Enable formatted text (Huh?)
    Also send responses to my email address
          


    Find more forums on General DiscussionsCreate your own forum at Network54
     Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement