| Original Message |
Viva La Musika
Posted Dec 21, 2011 7:53 AM
well how many times did oneill and co try and remove him? 1, 2 3 times?? Their blatant attempts to derail a decision could only mean that whatever way the CJ decided to go he would be blamed for bias or being corruptly paid off to vote oneills way. Oneill and co were smart to do this, in that it would garner public perception to retards like the author of this thread that the CJ was biased. Do you have any other evidence besides his negative decision to warrant the tag "corrupt"? I don't, but then nor do I have any to say that he isn't. Are we really going to blame the CJ, c'mon wantoks, wake up pls.... |
|
|
