CJ a Thief!April 18 2012 at 3:41 AM
Substantial evidence has been found revealing that the CJ has been manupilating court funds to pay for his childs school fees in an Australian University.
Please scappers if you more evidence on this please elaborate.
|what else is new?|
Re: CJ a Thief!
|April 18 2012, 7:15 AM |
Well, we realy do need the evedence before e can mjake judgment, but the CJ is knon for other activitiies as being corrupt. The CJ steals, O'Neill steals, Namah steals, the Somares steal. They're all thieves in a country that is now known as one of the3 most corrupt countries in the world. We didn't have this problem 25 years ago, other countries manage to deal with the problem, so anyone out there who says we just need to tolerate this corruption or accept that all our leaders are corrupt are losers! e PApua New Guineans are not as helpless and hopeless as a whole as those particular pessimists ould lead the orld to think.
|April 25 2012, 8:55 PM |
CJ is the head of the judicial arm of the government. Please don't assaninate his character not as a person but the office itself. if you have evidence then give details. he is a decent judicial officer.
|April 26 2012, 10:06 AM |
THE FIRST COMMON CLEAR EVIDENCE IS THE APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED JUDGES FROM OVERSEAS TO SIT IN THE TRIAL OF GC SOMARE'S LEADERSHIP TRIBUNAL AND HAVE GIVEN PENALTY 14 DAYS SUPENSION TO THE GC, NO ONE IN THE GOOD FRAME OF MIND COULD TAKE THIS ACTIONS
Re: CJ THIEF
|April 26 2012, 11:08 AM |
hahaha roots plis maski tok nating. mauswara blo yu narapla kain ya...how is that in any way an indication of the CJ's corruption. Go back to your cave you clown
|April 26 2012, 12:52 PM |
Morata, yu sim tu b da biggest clown coz u r nau implyin dat the CJ as a human being is above reproach and must be holier den da rest ov us. To let u in on a little known secret: Da CJ's rise to da top, from being a junior jurist some years ago, is connected to an electorate in the ESP. He was head of a Leadership Tribunal dat successfully saw da removal frm office of a former member of dat electorate. Based on dat accomplishment, people supported him through moral and spiritual support.
As result, the hand of da Divine moved and he jumped 10 spaces to become da CJ...he will admit it to yu himself! Now the current MP of dat electorate has got da CJ around his little finger to do his bidding. He even lobbied for him widin NA ranks to become da CJ seeing dat da CJ was able tu be manipulated.
The poor CJ is just anoder human being...em man tasol wankain osem yumi...he will make decisions to please his plitical masters and bias, however cloaked under legal reasoning and precedent etc.., I shud know coz mi pikinini blo jurist tu!!!
The current constitutional impasse is now a battle of da egos of both sides...nobody wants to be da lozer in da public eye!! Da only way out is for evryone to gofo ileksin and dis whole mess wil bikam nullified.
Re: CJ THIEF
|April 26 2012, 2:05 PM |
hahaha i didn't know whether to laugh or just continue with total bemusement because I have no idea what you're talking about! We're talking about the alleged corruption of the CJ and I commented that the original roots post that the appointment of eminent jurists from o/seas to sit on the GC's leadership tribunal provides nothing to support the contention of the thread! And now...you have stepped waay past the crazy line and gone into a sermon about the CJ's jump up the ranks (10 places right?? Umm...thats not true and if you were the son/daughter of a jurist yourself you WOULD know that is not true you imbecile)and then you dribble a little more about the current MP of that electorate having the CJ "around his little finger" providing no names, no proof or even the name of the case which you claim that this thing stems from! Ok I just let out a big laugh then. So its out of my system now. Furthermore you claim that the CJ just serves his bias and political masters, ok.....so....your basing this on....rumour & Speculation? But wait!! Your the child of a jurist so you should know right?? Ok even bigger laugh :)
I am not implying anything out of my comments, I just commented & you took it for a nice long jog around the crazy corner. If he's corrupt then fine,prove it and remove him according to the constitution, if not then take your conspiracy theories to the entertainment board you idiot.
|April 26 2012, 3:57 PM |
my assertion that the CJ should have appointed qualified, capable and experienced local jurist who are available in Png whom can easily sit on GC tribunal is very clear evidence of this topic, this also leads on to the CJ's special interest in the ESP Govt special reference case, WHY can't the CJ disqualify himself in this case??? when the CJ had an allegation of BIAS, afterall he is the CJ and will still be the CJ after the case is ended, the current CJ does not own this office, this CJ's office belongs to the people of PNG.
Re: CJ THIEF
|April 27 2012, 9:27 AM |
Well roots I'm not sure you could say that the appointment of outside ppl for the gc's tribunal is 'clear' evidence. My understanding is that it was/ is the cj's prerogative to appoint ppl to tribunals as he pleases. Sure u could argue that he didn't trust his brother judges but that's all history now. The tribunal slapped the gc on the wrist & life went on. Now the next point u raise regarding bias is very murky and ordinary png'ans have taken a simplistic viewpoint without understanding judicial procedure. The judiciall conduct act is irrelevant because it is being challenged in a s19 reference by the morobe pg. if there is grounds for a judge to recuse themselves due to a reasonable apprehension of bias then the judge themselves will rule on the matter and if they feel that there is sufficient cause then they will do so. What the JCA does is to take away this entrenched judicial function and give it to parliament. This is wrong. If a judge refuses to recuse themself then there are avenues for appeal where brother judges perhaps three or more on a panel can rule on application to have the judge remove themselves. The judges know exactly what they're doing. The cj knows his office belongs to the people of png, however, this government is not and has not ever followed proper procedures for anything that they've done. Twivvey & veritimos applied to have the cj remove himself, he called it an abuse of process and it was. Clearly. Y didn't they just appeal? These clown lawyers are relying on the force of a piece of legislation whose constitutional validity is being tested in the very same courts! The point is, the allegation of bias against the cj arose out of what? Meeting with Arthur? Lies. Ruling against onamah on dec 12? So did 2 other judges. The government and their conniving lawyers have not proved bias in any conclusive way and thus have given themselves the power to say when that is! Breach of s 99 separation don't u think? So wantok, if u have any other evidence then please enlighten the rest of us scapers!
|Current Topic - CJ a Thief!|