The KenpoNet Discussion Forum


 

 Return to Articles  

wouldn't finger set 1 and 2 bridge that gap?

November 20 2011 at 12:33 AM
No score for this post
Clark  (Login CFAK)
from IP address 76.94.150.103


Response to outer perimeter vs. outer rim

 

Thus shrinking the rim and perimeter due to the depths of action that the open hand strikes travel through to reach their targets.

What does the attacker feel when perimeter and rim are moving in to his attack as opposed to moving away from his attack?

The finger sets manipulate the depth of action between the attacker and defender, so why not bridge the gap with a weapon that can be a penetration or a manipulation?

"or outer rim is contact penetration range. outer perimeter is contact range"

Go through, not just to... yeah, got that. But for me, the moving sets that have multiple angles and ranges for using strikes and blocks are a better example.

CD

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Responses

 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

Visitors since April 1999

Thanks for visiting.