<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

October 22 2007

October 22 2007 at 1:41 PM
No score for this post
dragonfly  (no login)

 

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous
(no login)

male archetypes in media and advertising

No score for this post
October 22 2007, 8:26 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

October 24 2007

No score for this post
October 23 2007, 11:01 AM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

October 23 2007

No score for this post
October 23 2007, 12:22 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

October 23 2007

No score for this post
October 23 2007, 12:56 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

delete this board

No score for this post
October 23 2007, 1:05 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

October 23 2007

No score for this post
October 23 2007, 9:47 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

October 23 2007

No score for this post
October 23 2007, 9:57 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

October 25 2007

No score for this post
October 24 2007, 9:59 AM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

october 24 2007

No score for this post
October 24 2007, 1:23 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

October 25 2007

No score for this post
October 25 2007, 10:31 AM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
October 25 2007, 12:48 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

November 15, 2007

No score for this post
November 15 2007, 5:24 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

November 15, 2007

No score for this post
November 15 2007, 5:51 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
November 15 2007, 5:55 PM 



www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/shell/5/veganaction.gif

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

November 19, 2007

No score for this post
November 19 2007, 2:37 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
November 19 2007, 9:29 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

chess openings

No score for this post
November 22 2007, 2:37 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
November 24 2007, 1:59 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

curious math calculation shortcuts

No score for this post
November 30 2007, 5:38 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

The sound of the Beatles by Ger Tillekens

No score for this post
December 3 2007, 9:47 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

john lennon synopsis

No score for this post
December 6 2007, 4:39 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
December 7 2007, 12:59 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

The Truth about the History of the Guitar

No score for this post
December 8 2007, 2:50 PM 

The Truth about the History of the Guitar

Interestingly enough, no one really knows for sure where the guitar came from. Only hypotheses can be made. I hope that this short piece of writing will help solve a bit of this mystery. If anyone claims to KNOW exactly where the guitar came from, they are talking nonsense. This is the truth about the history of the guitar as far as researchers can tell...(Click below to read more)

First of all, as far as it is known, the oldest stringed instrument is the bow-shaped harp, whose sound probably derived from the hunting bow. It looked just like one. There may have been a fascination for the sound the bow when it was shot. Naturally, man would have tried to amplify the sound of this bow. One method of doing this was using a turtle shell, or possibly a pumpkin-like fruit or vegetable. By doing this, we now have an instrument with a “protruding” neck, yet this still has very little … well actually nothing really at all to do with the guitar as we know it.

There are two theories of where the guitar came from. Some believe that it originated in Africa, and there are also some that believe that it originated in Europe. As far as the European theories are concerned, there are several examples of instruments that were similar to the guitar with respect to an instrument with a resonating body and a protruding neck. The mandora, which is believed to be the forefather of the present day mandolin; the cittern, which looked like a little ukulele; the gittern, which the name guitar could have come from, yet this instrument has absolutely nothing to do with the present day guitar. The gittern is actually called a medieval guitar, but as said before, it shares absolutely no characteristics with the present-day instrument , except for the fact that it had a neck with strings. And we cannot forget the rebab. The rebab is an instrument with a neck and strings that is still used in present day Arabian music. The problem with categorizing these instruments with the present day guitar lies in the fact that they could have also been the forefathers of the violin, or any stringed instrument for that matter. For this reason, it cannot be said that they have anything to do with the instrument in question. Reliefs in stone were found in Rome and even in Turkey with people playing a portrayal of something that looked similar to the guitar, although it cannot be identified exactly what was being played in these depictions. The findings in Turkey actually cancel out the certainty of the theory once believed to be true, that the guitar came from North Africa by way of Spain.

In Africa, there was a type of harp that was found called the Queen Shub-ad’s harp. There is a hypothesis that says that this instrument evolved into a necked instrument in order to control the notes better. A Babylonian relief has been found of a man playing a type of instrument with a protruding neck and a resonating body. It was a guitar-looking instrument. Yet, what the instrument actually was cannot be identified. Similar findings were also discovered in the research of ancient Egypt. Although it can be said without doubt that the lute, an instrument similar, but still very different to the guitar, came from Africa. We cannot say that this had anything to do with the guitar.

At this point, the only thing that can be said for sure, is that there were several instruments with a protruding neck and a resonating body. Again, it must be stressed that these can in no way be considered a guitar. This refers to the method of playing as well as the structure. It can only be said that these instruments existed. There were similar to the present day guitar in regard to only one aspect. They were instruments with a protruding neck and a resonating body. Yet, so is the violin!

Let’s take a look at the name of the guitar, “Guitar”. This can also help us to go back in time a reconstruct the origin of the instrument.

Chitarra – Italian, Guiterne – French, Guiterre – French, Gitarre- German, Guitarra – Spanish

All of these names are similar, but where did they come from? There are quite a few theories. Some believe that it came from the Persian word, ‘Sitar’, ‘si’ meaning 3 and ‘tar’ meaning string..(This name is also used in the present day to label the Indian instrument.) It is believed that the word was taken by the Greeks and made into the word ‘Kythara’. Kythara is not Greek in nature; it is a borrowed word.. Yet the newest research has shown that the word may have been taken by the Greeks from the Phoenician word ‘Kuthar’, the God of Work or the Hebrew word ‘Kinnor’, which was also mentioned in the Old Testament as being the harp of David. Kythara is the most likely ancestor for the word guitar. Yet, even at this time, it was surely only a label for stringed instruments in general.

This is one of the biggest problems researchers have. Since the Kythara, and throughout the centuries thereafter, many words existed similar to the word “guitar”. The first literary example was in 1275 in a scripture known as the Roman de la Rose written by Jean de Meung. In this piece of writing, the word “Gittern” was mentioned. Yet, indeed, many instruments similar to the guitar existed. Along with the gittern, the terms lute and vihuela were all interchangeable to mean stringed instruments of many different sorts. It was similar to what we have today when unknowing people, who do not know the difference between a ukulele and guitar just call the ukulele a little guitar.

It was not until the 16th century that pieces of literature began to shed light on the whole subject regarding where the instrument we play today came from. Although the word vihuela was used as a cumulative term for all stringed instruments in Spain at the time, there were two types of instruments under this category that can be noted. There was the lute and the “guitarra de quattro órdenes”(Four string guitar). The lute was used to play music by the serious musician and the four-string guitar was used by the peasants. Now, if you look into history, the lute was surely brought to Spain by the Moors, who controlled Spain for a time. After their oppression ended, the Spanish faced a problem. They did not want to identify with the lute, the instrument of their previous oppressing rulers, but at the same time, they liked the music it produced. Well, the four string guitar was a prime candidate for a substitute. There was only one problem. The polyphonic music, music with several voices, was very popular and the four-string guitar at the time was incapable of performing such musical masterpieces and the aristocracy did not really look highly upon the instrument itself, an instrument for the lower class. For this reason, the four-string guitar was given 2 more strings and developed into a six-string instrument, the“Vihuela”. The Vihuela, although related to the guitar, had quite a different life-line in history. This was the instrument used by the professional and the rich. This instrument, along with the lute died out in history. The reason being that people kept adding more strings to the point that the normal person was unable to play it, maintenance was difficult, and composers just stopped writing for the instrument.

The four- string guitar still remained among the peasants and was popular. Most importantly, people composed for it, and not only in Spain, but in the rest of Europe as well. It survived the test of time. It is this four-stringed instrument that must be examined and considered the forefather of our present day guitar, although the tuning was much different and the construction was much smaller.

By the seventeenth century, the guitar was given another string(which were actually two, for the guitars of that time were similar to today’s twelve-string guitars with double strings). The five string guitar became known as the “guitarra española” or the baroque guitar. - This instrument still had a long way to go before it was to become the guitar we have today. This guitar had a very strange tuning. Although not the same, the tuning can be described as similar to today’s banjo tuning, with that little high string in an odd place.

At the end of the 18th century, it is clear where the guitar came from. There were books written for a guitar with 6 strings. The strings were still double, but the tuning was that of the present day instrument. This is why most people say that the guitar is only 200 years old.

With time, leading up to today, another string was added making the guitar a 6-stringed instrument. Developments in strings, with the never-ending battle of trying to make the guitar louder, caused the guitar to get bigger and lose its double strings, thereby becoming the guitar we know today, one of the most popular instruments on Earth.

---By Michael Ferris

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

happiness...

No score for this post
December 8 2007, 2:57 PM 

She's not a girl who misses much
Do do do do do do
oh yeah
She's well acquainted with
the touch of the velvet hand
Like a lizard on a window pain
The man in the crowd with the
multicolored mirror on his hobnail boots
Lying with his eyes while his
hands are busy working overtime
A soap impression of his wife which
he ate and donated to the National Trust

I need a fix cause I'm going down
Down to the bits that I left uptown
I need a fix cause I'm going down
Mother Superior jump the gun
Mother Superior jump the gun
Mother Superior jump the gun

Happiness is a warm gun
Happiness is a warm gun mama

When I hold you in my arms
and I feel my finger on you trigger
I know nobody can do no harm
Because Happiness is a warm gun mama
Happiness is a warm gun yes it is
Happiness is a warm yes it is gun
Ah, don't you know that
Happiness is a warm gun mama yeah



apache.ece.arizona.edu/~ece220/Course_Notes/transistor.JPG



library.thinkquest.org/3308/transistor.jpg



www.radio-electronics.com/info/circuits/transistor_2_device_amp/transistor_2_device_amp.gif



www.creative-science.org.uk/transistor/fig1.gif



fourier.eng.hmc.edu/e84/lectures/figures/transistorBJT1.gif



users.arczip.com/rmcgarra2/83y262-5.jpg



www.ka7oei.com/733vrxl.jpg



www.dansdata.com/images/s150/board400.jpg

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

breathing exercises

No score for this post
December 8 2007, 3:03 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

John Lennon Conspiracy

No score for this post
December 8 2007, 4:42 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
December 9 2007, 3:19 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
December 11 2007, 8:43 AM 

http://www.snowcrest.net/soza/health/myessiac.htm

Preparation of the herbal tea:
Measure out the desired amount of the dry mixture.
For each eight ounces of dry herbal mixture, use 2 gallons of distilled water, in a stainless steel kettle. For four ounces, use 1 gallon of distilled water. For two ounces, use 2 quarts of distilled water. [If using half my 8-ounce package, STIR WELL, because I measure directly into each ZipLoc bag.]

Boil the distilled water. It takes about 30 minutes for 2 gallons.

Put the dry herbal mixture into the boiling water.

Stir it and boil hard for about 10 minutes, with the lid on.

Cover and allow it to sit and cool slowly for six hours.

After six hours, stir it thoroughly with a wooden or stainless steel tool.

Let it sit for another six hours.

Return the kettle to the stove and bring it to a boil.

When the boiling point is reached, turn off the heat and pour the tea thru a stainless steel strainer into a second stainless steel kettle.

Clean the first kettle thoroughly.

Strain the contents a second time from pot 2 to pot 1.

Bottle the resulting herbal tea immediately into dark amber bottles and seal it while still hot. I used clear glass canning jars successfully.

Cool them, and store in the refrigerator, until needed. I found that if not used quickly enough, the tea lost its strength, so I recommend using pint jars, instead of quarts.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directions for use:
Heat 2 ounces or 4 tablespoons of distilled water, and then mix it with 2 ounces or 4 tablespoons of the tea taken directly from the refrigerator.
Pour the tea into the measuring device, instead of sticking the spoon into the jar. This habit will protect against contamination.

Keep the tea refrigerated at all times. Shake well each time before pouring.

Take it on an empty stomach, at least 2 hours after eating. Wait 2 more hours before eating after taking the tea.

Good times to take it are at bedtime, or upon awakening. More seriously ill persons can take it safely 3 to 4 times daily, spaced out, as described above, separated from meals, by two hours. It is not going to do you much good to take it with meals. It will not work all mixed up with your dinner. That would just be a waste of money.


http://www.tldp.com/issue/183/Cats%20Claw%20and%20Essiac.htm

Unfortunately, Caisse sold the rights to the name Essiac to a company in Canada which no longer prepares the individual herbs as she did and there are many knockoff products under different names, that do not prepare the herbs as she did either. In order for the herbs to be most effective, sheep sorrel must never be boiled or its medicinal properties will be destroyed. It must be simmered for 20 minutes at no higher that 140¡. Burdock root and turkey rhubarb root must be boiled for 20 minutes and slippery elm bark needs to be boiled for 20 minutes, allowed to cool and then boiled again for another 20 minutes. This is a tedious procedure that must be followed religiously if one expects to see the kind of results experienced by nurse Caisse's patients.

A few years before her death, Caisse came to the United States and worked with Dr. Charles Brusch, the former personal physician to John F. Kennedy. Together they modified the original formula by adding a specific amount of watercress. This was done because the original formula contains a high level of oxalic acids which can contribute to forming kidney stones. Brusch and Caisse determined that the correct amount of watercress would help the kidneys flush the acids out of the system. Later this new five herb formula was given to Dr. Bill Maclean who began preparing all the herbs individually in order to maximize their effectiveness.

Recently, Dr. Maclean began adding Cat's Claw to the formula and it is now being offered commercially under a number of different names. Though it is too soon to know how effective this new product will be, preliminary reports suggest that it may be helpful with cancer, diabetes, Parkinson's disease and even AIDS. It is certainly a product worthy of further investigation by the wholistic health community.

I suspect that over the next five years the potential of this product will become realized as more doctors and individuals begin using it. For now I am content in knowing that this product exists and is readily available to anyone who needs it.

Why Commercial Essiac and Most Essiac Knock-Off Products Are Only Partially Effective
(Author's addendum to the above article as follows):
The original Essiac Formula given to Rene Caisse can be traced back to the native Ojibway Indians of Canada. It is a formula that she later simplified utilizing four herbs: Burdock root, Slippery Elm bark, Turkey Rhubarb root and Sheep Sorrel. Of these four, the first three are referred to as hard tissue herbs (roots and/or barks) while the fourth is a soft tissue herb (leaves and/or flowers). Hard tissue herbs must be boiled in order to release all of their medicinal properties, while soft tissue herbs must be simmered at a temperature not exceeding 140 degrees.

The majority of these products available commercially today have all the herbs mixed together with instructions to either boil or simmer them and they cannot be prepared separately. If all herbs are boiled, the enzymes and other medicinal properties in the Sheep Sorrel will be destroyed. If all herbs are simmered together, much of the medicinal properties in the Burdock root, Slippery Elm bark and Turkey Rhubarb root will not be released.

This is the reason why many people do not experience the same results that Rene Caisse did, with her 50 plus years of using the formula in Canada.

I know of two commercial products available in the United States that have prepared the herbs according to the directions of Dr. Charles Brusch, the personal physician to John F. Kennedy, who later modified the formula with Rene Caisse, to include a specific amount of watercress. These products are known as Ezzeac Plus and Ezzeac Plus Cat's Claw.

With the advice of Dr. Brusch, Dr. Bill Maclean created Ezzeac Plus and then later Ezzeac Plus Cat's Claw. Both are ready to use preparations, where the hard tissue herbs are boiled separately and the soft tissue herbs, including Watercress, are properly simmered. This is a labor intensive, more tedious procedure, resulting in a more expensive commercial product, at a higher cost to the consumer; however, when faced with a problem that this product might address, which product would you choose?

There is no doubt in my mind. I would choose the product where all the herbs have been prepared in the proper manner: Ezzeac Plus or Ezzeac Plus Cat's Claw.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
December 11 2007, 9:35 AM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

pandiatonicism, pan-diatonic clusters

No score for this post
December 11 2007, 3:00 PM 

http://www.arvopart.org/glossary.html

pandiatonicism - a compositional technique by which a diatonic scale is adhered to but not used in a conventional manner (lack of standard chord progressions or resolution of dissonance, etc.). Pärt's music is pandiatonic mostly in the area of unresolved dissonance, although the tintinnabulation technique itself could be referred to as a type of pandiatonicism. As a general example, if you were to take a 2x4 and pound (lightly of course) on strictly the white notes of the piano (C major diatonic or A minor diatonic) you would be demonstrating a type of pandiatonicism. You are not using standard choral progressions (I - IV - V - vi - ii - V7 - I , etc.) and you are not correctly resolving dissonances.


polychord - a chord composed of two or more traditional triads (eg. D major triad and G major triad)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandiatonic

http://www.123exp-music.com/t/00334245651/
Pandiatonic
In music pandiatonic chords and successions are those formed freely from all degrees of a diatonic scale without regard for their diatonic function, sometimes to the extent of no single pitch being felt as a tonic. The term was invented by Nicolas Slonimsky to describe examples such as the added sixth or the nonfunctional tonality of composers such as Aaron Copland (in his populist works; Jaffe, 1992), Igor Stravinsky (in his neoclassical works), and more recently Steve Reich and John Adams (Jaffe, 1992).

http://www.afn.org/~afn54096/mus-theor/footnote.html

http://societymusictheory.org/mto/issues/mto.01.7.6/mto.01.7.6.everett.html

http://www.outsideshore.com/school/music/almanac/html/Improvisation/Harmonic_Considerations/Modal_Improvisation.htm

http://www.outsideshore.com/school/music/almanac/html/Music_Theory/Harmony/Non-Tonal_Music.htm


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
December 11 2007, 3:07 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Andrew Rogers Tab Archive

No score for this post
December 11 2007, 3:24 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

A Compilation of Sing-Along, Folk, & Rock Guitar Songs (with chords and lyrics)

No score for this post
December 11 2007, 3:26 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: October 22 2007

No score for this post
December 11 2007, 5:25 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Current Topic - October 22 2007  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
dragonfly99 dot net