NOTE: posts not approved by the moderator simply are NOT SEEN AT ALL on this page.
Trash posts are just auto-deleted. NOBODY SEES THEM. 50% of posters are not smart
enough to get this. Are you? ---------------------------------------------------
CZ Forums - The best Cryptozoology Forum - THE BEST BIGFOOT/NESSIE/ forum there is. We discuss all aspects of Bigfoot/Nessie and Major Cryptids. We discuss flesh & blood, spiritual, White man's and also Indian beliefs. We hope your info can lead to EVIDENCE our field workers can obtain and test. We are NOT here as a business, as some are, but as a group that will send evidence to scientists. WE DO NOT HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS. BUT WE TRY, AND WE TEST IDEAS.
Call 925-385-0422 re sighting reports and to sign up for expeditions.EMAIL -monsterfinder@gmail.com - We are the best, the Real Deal, look no further. Note that so-called "weird" ideas often result in solid scientific LEADS that open a path to solid findings. (At one time it was against the current laws of those times to state that the Earth went around the Sun. Think
OUTSIDE THE BOX. Join us.)
--
Please read! And take note of what I am fixing to say here.
by Janice Carter (no login)
No one is an expert in this field, and until we have exhausted our studies and have experts accredited herein, for someone to claim otherwise is a gross overstatement. Yes we have our Scientist that are experts in certain fields of study, that do study just as we do about the bigfoot, but as of yet none of them are experts on the subject alone or all together.
Hominology 101.
Examples: We have Jeff Meldrum that is an expert in his field of study, M. K. Davis in his also, Igor Burtsev in his field, Dmitri Bayanov in his field, Jimmy Chilcutt in his field, Scott Marlow in his field, Loren Coleman in his field, W. Henner Farenbach in his field, and a lot of others that would take a page to even begin listing. (I have great respect for all the above named, and many others that dedicate their spare time to this field of study. I am not trying to slight anyone out there by not mentioning their name.) All are experts in their own chosen fields of study. Yet only by joining forces with one another, and each bringing their piece of the puzzle to the table to be included, do we even begin imagining what our first glimpse of the picture might become when it shapes up to be the finished portrait.
Now should I criticize them because they say something I don't exactly agree with? I should not. Keep in mind, I am not studied in their fields of expertise here, so what I should be doing instead of running my mouth or falling asleep in class, is to sit up and pay them uttermost attention. I would be learning something I did not know about. However, my being the student, and should I have something of importance to offer or ask them to expanded their study into further, I would approach them with my concerns and theory, whatever that may be, and discuss this with them in a most civilized way for their consideration.
That is the way it works, here people. Do not assume you know it all, because you certainly don't. Until you walk that mile in the other persons shoes, assume nothing, and give credit and respect to that person that they well deserve. Some here know that I and a few of the people I mentioned above do not agree on everything the other says.
Not picking on Loren or Jerry here, but Loren's brother Jerry has done his best to debunk me and show me as a hoaxer regarding Bigfoot and my knowledge thereof. Do I carry a grudge toward Jerry, do I disrespect him for his public opinion of me and my claims, or do I respect him for his opinion of me? I choose to RESPECT Jerry for his opinion because to the best of his ability he investigated my case. No, he did not go to the source of the matter, that being me. I would have chosen to go to the choice of the matter, however, Jerry, for whatever reasons chose not to.
Now do I act the idiot and call him every name in the book on public forums, saying he is a liar and whatever else I can think to say negative about or of him? NO. Do I debate his claims and opinion of me and my situation of my case about Bigfoot? Yes. The civilized way for me to handle this would be for me to invite Jerry to come and research first hand with me. Let me either prove his claims and opinion of me correct, or half way correct, or all together wrong.
We as the individuals we are, are entitled to our own opinions of any given issue or subject. Just because one persons opinion differs from another's doesn't make one right and the other wrong. I'm telling you we are all going to have to start pulling our own weight here and joining forces to get to the bottom, or top, of this mystery, BIGFOOT/SASQUATCH/ALMASTY/SNOWMAN/YETI.
Thank you for your kind attention to my post here.
Yours,
Jan
Posted on Dec 22, 2007, 1:45 AM from IP address 68.47.238.155
Posters take note that all posts are scanned and moderated. Gross posts will not make it. Our auto-scan and delete program eliminates all hostile and flat-out stupid submissions.
Ye mod