NOTE: posts not approved by the moderator simply are NOT SEEN AT ALL on this page.
Trash posts are just auto-deleted. NOBODY SEES THEM. 50% of posters are not smart
enough to get this. Are you? ---------------------------------------------------
CZ Forums - The best Cryptozoology Forum - THE BEST BIGFOOT/NESSIE/ forum there is. We discuss all aspects of Bigfoot/Nessie and Major Cryptids. We discuss flesh & blood, spiritual, White man's and also Indian beliefs. We hope your info can lead to EVIDENCE our field workers can obtain and test. We are NOT here as a business, as some are, but as a group that will send evidence to scientists. WE DO NOT HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS. BUT WE TRY, AND WE TEST IDEAS.
Call 925-385-0422 re sighting reports and to sign up for expeditions.EMAIL -monsterfinder@gmail.com - We are the best, the Real Deal, look no further. Note that so-called "weird" ideas often result in solid scientific LEADS that open a path to solid findings. (At one time it was against the current laws of those times to state that the Earth went around the Sun. Think
OUTSIDE THE BOX. Join us.)
If you could please give a link so to this group's forum may help. The address you gave did not turn up anything and I searched under the Minnesota Group and came up with nothing. Not saying it is not there, just could not find it. I would say that you are incorrect about there not being DNA evidence the new show Monster Quest came up with Unknown DNA from blood. Also as you know it is very hard to retrieve DNA from a hair sample unless the follicle is intact. There are animal fur and hair experts that have studied the hair that came from the Carter farm and found that it did not match any known animal. So, there are other ways then DNA to find if a hair sample came from a known animal or not. Though DNA is very hard to retrieve from hair though I am not saying it can not be done. Most viable DNA comes from tissue and bodily fluids. I can say that the hair was analyzed through comparison with known hair follicles and did not match any known animal or human hair. As for no one being allowed on the property that was not Ms. Green's doing, as I can remember it was only researchers that had permission to go onto the property, by Janice Carter. She was involved heavily in this case, but was not the one that told her not to allow anyone to her farm that was of Ms. Carter's wishes she did not want to endanger her children, which is understandable. I am not knocking anyone's view here just trying to put mine out there. I hope everyone has a happy new year!
Nathan Davis
Posted on Dec 26, 2007, 4:52 PM from IP address 146.184.0.119
Posters take note that all posts are scanned and moderated. Gross posts will not make it. Our auto-scan and delete program eliminates all hostile and flat-out stupid submissions.
Ye mod
