Det är en Saga; man behöver inte vara illamående då man möter dokumenterade fakta å någon form demokratisk arena... Det finns ju en del intressanta typer som inte vill se människans civiliserade sidan, utan fordrar att andra vara robotiker i tjänsten... Tyvärr finns en del som aldrig vill respektera andras grundläggande rättigheter... Vissa fräcka vill inte fatta att det finns människor som har olika idéer, särskilda dikter, uttryckssätt i den litteratur världen d.v.s. det är inte vinnande att bita sig via berättelseförloppet. Självklart ska både onda och goda spela sin roll på scenen... Vem som är onda i den sagan och vem som är pragmatiska, kritisera figurerna senare... Skriv recensioner eller en liknande saga om du vill säga något!.. Är det inte bra att visa reaktionen på mänskligt sätt istället för trampa närliggande som åsna? Våga möta sanningen 
De vill inte fatta att de finns redan i sådana berättelser men det är också ett psykologiskt bevis att de som smutskastar mina sagor hatar sig själv djupt inne i deras egna grisliknande hjärtan, kalkliknande hjärnor... De är människofiender, inget annat.. Gissa då hurdan varelser som utnyttjar människo-ID; gissa snälla hur vi behöver fler och humana sagor i en sådan planet!..
Först bevittnade vi snortjejen hos australisk&svensk sionsitsika ligor, som villig horapraktikant även före sitt studium, därmed fick hon kunskapen att samla falska "certificate", exempelvis enligt en del material hade hon haft internationell provokationserfarenhet från en stor affärsjuridisk advokatfirma, Allen Allen & Hemsley i Sydney, Australien. Hederslösa fascistiska Elisabeth FITTAz är medlem i sionistiska sekter och därför uppdragsvis deltar fittan i provokativa konferenser att nämna all brott är hedersrelaterade bara de misstänkta ska vara muslimer. Det är ett nytt projekt som inte hemlighet längre att detta också bedrivs af sionistiska lobbyer.. Hederslösa aktioner blev en form mode, en kedja, i början ser vi den största provokationen som etiketterat Elfte September. "Kränka muslimerna var som helst, hur som helst", så enkelt är missionen och mycket vinnande, speciellt man är flexibel att kränknings metoden legal-maskerat. Juridisk maskerade handeln, istället för judisk!.. Passar mycket bra till den fräcka horan så att hon döljer sitt sann ansikte... Sådan perfekt roll skule hon aldrig kunna drömma och därför Elizabeth FRITZ&samverkande 4 jursithoror i sin byrå öppnade champagne flaskor de deras hallickar informerade att "mission accomplished"...Plus häromdagen ser vi att denne horan och samverkande lika skitiga grisar blanda i "migrationsfrågor", speciellt de lättsinniga, mest villiga att prostituera sig. Elisabetz insisterar att invandrarlagens grundregel ska vara att "asyl garanteras til de systemlydiga prostituerade importfigurer, homo-pedofiler får extra poäng"... 
där också nästan helt fritt att våldta svenska flickor och därefter överdriva med rättsväsendet att det inte skulle finnas halvjudisk-haljvkurdiska dialektens kännare som skulle översätta rätt i EU.
Just nu ! *`+´*
Justice for all -defenders
Respond to this message
Goto Forum Home
Justice Betrayal
by-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
`+´`+´
Twice upon a time...
Dear listeners, readers, tv-viewers! Welcome! A new saga is shining here... Brave people makes these forums available to encourage intelligent and open democratic debate platforms.
Users are requested to participate in the spirit of good fellowship and tolerance. The views and opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent those of saga tellers.... "Living tales broadcasting" does not mean "fantastical fairy tales", but aims to offer a solution for "living questions of humanity" and one of them begins here, today's well-documented tales! Notice it respectfully, please; this is a SAGA; man don't need to be stressed... Avoid to show incredible angry attitudes or overwhelmed happy on such tales... Test your self-control! Well, we are aware, there are a kind of interesting types, which fanatically programmed to see the similarly robotics and they can not accept the creative brains... Compare yourself with them! Take it easy; don't to be imprisoned of "mass-medial brainwashing campaigns"... In normally case, there are different open-views, artistically creations, poetry, approximate to the social cases in community; listen to them... If you want to criticize these stories, feel free; do that! 
No doubt! This is a form of literature to create essays; of course built a bridge to say out your opinion; do that, please! Other-ways, you will just a living witness here; yes, here seems many aggressive robotics making shit after my tales; let them stay on this page as my best evidence… People needs such testimony; who tells saga, who has shit in his mouth; discover on Internet around my saga texts... They are not only my enemies, because I have nothing as private conflict with them... In fact they are the fanatical enemies of human being; this is the question... They almost the AIPAC/ADL etc jewry masonry gangs and their related criminals, recruited staff still spread enormous spam and they run worldwide sabotage on Internet! Why? This is their traditional character and profession. Jewish fanatism based on hate and degrading of human! Neo-Zionism is most freak Fascism today and this well-donated machinery is completely fit with neo-Imperialism!.. Jews and their polit-whores hate Humanism, because of they are not idiots, they know well that the Independent Institutions and awakened human prevents their bloody profitees!.. Therefore they run systematic sabotage processes and spam is one of such kinky methodes... For example many false drug-seller-advertisements of the provocateur-saboter Fascist Jew Daniel&PIMPS and collaborated polit-whores worldwide:
- What is the main profession of such Zioni-Snakes?
- Sabotage! Actually all the Jewish lobbies&collaborators are experienced on the sabotage tactics worldwide... It's their traditionally profession like polit-prostitution...
- Well! My Grandfather had pigs at farm; all the animals had name there and selected examples prized by true ID cards... I see that Grandfather's true pigs were more respectable than human faced piggies&doggies... Let's these doggies shitting here on Internet, mostly using false sexual announcements; let's people witness what a kind kinky planet the two-legged pigs dreaming… Keep the evidences should be apparently pasted there on internet page, although it's not friendly; all after checking this attack it'll easier to struggle against thus kinky character, who beyond this dirtiness! Go on to tell what the newest! In fact, we have much more exciting broadcasting tournaments... You see; the fanatics of system are so eager to bite your heel.. No doubt, its typical attitudes of bulldogs and lapdogs of judaized imperialism... But criticism welcomes....
Of course there are different opinions… Discussion is better than warplanes... Let's create new saga examples and try to build a wonderful socialistic saga-world for whole human being; yes, for human, dear! Solidarity regards from saga-teller, additional works of studio-guests, followers on friendly tv channels...
-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
, .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....~
There are not the whore Jurists of ICJ sects on this world, well, there are honoured figures too, who defending humanbeing; for example:
"J'accuse: War Crimes and Iraq", says Conn Hallinan from California on 5th, 2004
“…The Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives…”
Article 48, 1977 addition to the Geneva Conventions, Part IV
Consider the following:
On Oct. 8, U.S. fighter bombers carried out what the Pentagon called a “precision strike” against “terrorist leaders” in Falluja, a sprawling city of 300,000 west of Baghdad. For the past two months Falluja has been the target of a bombing campaign. According to the New York Times, the attack wounded 17 people, nine of whom were women and children. The victims were apparently from a wedding party that had just dispersed.
The Times went on to quote a “senior Pentagon official” who said, “We know what the strike was supposed to hit and we hit it. If a wedding party was going on, well, it was in concert with a meeting of a top Zarqawi lieutenant.” Zarqawi is a Jordanian who has claimed credit for numerous roadside bombings and assassinations in Iraq.
But according to Article 50 of the Geneva Conventions, “The presence within the civilian population of individuals who do not come within the definition of civilians does not deprive the population of its civilian character.”
In short, the attack violated the Conventions, and the “Pentagon official” — most likely Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz — should be arrested and tried for violating international law. Since the attack constituted a “grave breach” of the Geneva Conventions, the official could also be charged under the 1996 U.S. War Crimes Act.
Civilian Intimidation, Collective Punishment, and Torture, are the ways in which the USA ‘liberates’ its unwilling beneficiaries.
In the same article, the Times also quoted a “senior Bush administration official” as saying that the bombing was helpful for exploiting “fault lines” in Falluja, and that it would push the “citizenry” of Falluja to deny sanctuary and assistance to the insurgents, adding “that’s a good thing.”
The “official” might, indeed, think it was “a good thing,” but it also violated Article 51 of the Geneva Conventions, which states: “The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack.”
A “Pentagon official” also told the Times: “If there are civilians dying in connection with these attacks, and with the destruction, the locals at some point have to make a decision. Do they want to harbor the insurgents and suffer the consequences that come with that?”
In other words, terrify the civilian population into cooperating, a strategy that Article 51 of the Geneva Conventions explicitly forbids: “Acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population, are prohibited.”
Violations of the Convention
The violations of the Convention are not limited to the bombing campaigns. The Washington Post recently revealed that the Bush administration allowed the CIA to transfer Iraqi combatants out of the country - a violation of Article 49 of the Geneva Conventions - and to hide them from the Red Cross - a violation of Article 63 of the Geneva Conventions.
According to an FBI report, FBI agents visiting Abu Ghraib Prison, witnessed hooded and chained Iraqi prisoners being slapped by U.S. soldiers, who told the agents it was a sleep depravation technique. The agents also saw prisoners held naked in tiny isolation cells. The Defense Department readily admits it uses loud music, painful restraints, and a semi-drowning technique called “water boarding,” to “soften up” prisoners for interrogation.
All of the above behavior breaks numerous parts of the Convention. Article 85 of the Geneva Conventions, for instance, says that, “Sleeping quarters shall be sufficiently spacious and well ventilated.” Article 90 of the Geneva Conventions instructs that, “The clothing supplied by the Detaining Power to internees and the outward marking placed on their clothing shall not be ignominious or expose them to ridicule.” Article 117 of the Geneva Conventions says, “Imprisonment in premises without daylight, and in general, all forms of cruelty without exception are prohibited.”
Besides transgressions of Geneva, the agents also witnessed violations of several other international treaties to which the U.S. is a signatory.
Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
The UN Convention Against Torture prohibits, “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession,” adding “no exceptional circumstances whatsoever… may be invoked as a justification for torture.”
On Oct. 27, Theo van Boven, UN director of reports on torture, expressed “serious concern” over “allegations of attempts to circumvent the absolute nature of the prohibition of torture and other forms of ill treatment in the name of countering terrorism, particularly in relationship to interrogation and conditions of detention of prisoners.” While he did not charge the U.S. by name, there is no argument about to whom he was referring.
The Bush administration likes to invoke the so-called changed nature of the post-9/11 world as the attacks created new conditions that render the Conventions obsolete, somehow trumping U.S. adherence to international law. White House counsel Alberto Gonzales dismisses the Geneva Conventions as “quaint,” and the U.S. Justice Department wrote up memos giving the CIA the right to violate both international laws and the U.S. War Crimes Act.
Systematic Violations
But systematic violations of the Geneva Conventions by the U.S. hardly started with 9/11. Indeed, they are characteristic of virtually every conflict the U.S. has been involved in since the end of World War II. The following are just a few examples:
According to a 1999 Pulitzer Prize winning series by Associated Press, it was the official policy of the U.S. military to fire on South Korean civilians during the Korean War. U.S. bombing also obliterated virtually every civilian target in North Korea.
In Vietnam, civilians living in “free fire zones”—most of the country—were considered valid targets, and civilians were overwhelmingly the victims of bombing during the Indochina war. Then National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger instructed the U.S. Air Force to bomb “anything that moved” in Cambodia. From 1967 to 1970, the “Phoenix Program” assassinated some 60,000 to 70,000 civilians in South Vietnam. A U.S. Congressional study found that the Program “appears to have violated the 1948 Geneva Conventions for the protection of civilians.”
Bombing attacks in the first Gulf War and the Kosovo War systematically targeted power plants and grids, railway stations, refineries, communication networks, sewerage treatment facilities, and water purification plants, in spite of Article 54 of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibits attacking any objectives “indispensable to the survival of the civilian population.”
One could even make a case that the use of hundreds of tons of Depleted Uranium Ammunition (DUA) in Kosovo and the two Gulf wars constitutes a war crime. The Conventions clearly require the victorious party to assume responsibility for the conquered civilian population and to clean up the chaos of war. DUA has poisoned water supplies in Iraq, parts of Kuwait, and Yugoslavia, and birth defects and cancer incidences are far higher in areas where DUA was used. The U.S., however, claims that DUA poses no potential health risks, and therefore it doesn’t have to remove the low-level radioactive debris.
It is not only a record Americans should be ashamed of; it is one that should make us afraid. The Geneva Conventions and other international laws were not drawn up by bleeding heart liberals, nor were they designed to protect weaker nations. They were a response to the enormous numbers of civilian casualties inflicted by World War II, and as a practical way to shield everyone’s armed forces from humiliation, torture and death at the hands of an adversary.
If we are cavalier or dismissive about international law, it will encourage others to be so as well. The most likely victims of that policy will be we civilians, as well as our own uniformed forces. If we torture prisoners and hide them from the eyes of organizations like the Red Cross, why shouldn’t others do the same to our soldiers and civilians?
In a recent commentary in the Financial Times, Jakob Kellenberger, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, wrote: “The struggle against terrorism cannot be legitimate if it undermines basic values shared by humanity. The right to life and protection against murder, torture and degrading treatment must be at the heart of the actions of those engaged in this struggle. The struggle will lose credibility if it is used to justify acts otherwise considered unacceptable, such as the killing of people not participating in hostilities.”
Apart from the inhumanity our actions engender, as an entirely practical matter, to do anything less than Kellenberger suggests is to place our own people in harm’s way.
*`+´*
Supreme Court rules Guantanamo military commissions illegal...
Wire services are reporting that the US Supreme Court has ruled that military commissions at Guantanamo Bay are illegal under military law and the Geneva Conventions, holding in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, that President Bush did not have authority to establish the commissions as constituted.
Salim Hamdan, a former driver for Osama bin Laden who is being held at Guantanamo Bay, challenged his trial before a military commission rather than in front of an ordinary military court. Hamdan's lawyer told the Court during oral arguments in March that the commission system is unfair because it allows President Bush's military subordinates to determine who will act as judge and jury and also decide which crimes will be prosecuted. The Bush administration argued that the special military tribunals established by the president, which do not adhere to either standard US military procedure or the Geneva Conventions, can be used to prosecute suspected terrorists as war criminals. The government has said that Hamdan is not entitled to Geneva Convention protections because he was not part of a uniformed enemy.
10:27 AM ET - The decision was 5-3, with Chief Justice Roberts not participating as he had previously ruled on the case in favor of the government while sitting as a judge on the US DC Circuit Court of Appeals. SCOTUSblog has more.
11:29 AM ET - The Court held there is no express authorization from Congress for Hamdan's military commission and that commission structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions. The Court said that commission procedures set forth in Commission Order No. 1 do not comply with UCMJ Article 36 The statute allows military commission procedures to differ from standard criminal procedure or military court-martial rules when necessary, but the Court ruled that although the President has determined that it is impracticable to apply "the principles of law and the rules of evidence generally recognized in the trial of criminal cases in the United States district courts," he has not "made a similar official determination that it is impracticable to apply the rules for courts-martial." The Court also said:
Nothing in the record before us demonstrates that it would be impracticable to apply court-martial rules in this case. There is no suggestion, for example, of any logistical difficulty in securing properly sworn and authenticated evidence or in applying the usual principles of relevance and admissibility. Assuming arguendo that the reasons articulated in the President's Article 36(a) determination ought to be considered in evaluating the impracticability of applying court-martial rules, the only reason offered in support of that determination is the danger posed by international terrorism.52 Without for one moment underestimating that danger, it is not evident to us why it should require, in the case of Hamdan's trial, any variance from the rules that govern courts-martial.
The absence of any showing of impracticability is particularly disturbing when considered in light of the clear and admitted failure to apply one of the most fundamental protections afforded not just by the Manual for Courts-Martial but also by the UCMJ itself: the right to be present. See 10 U. S. C. A. §839(c) (Supp. 2006). Whether or not that departure technically is "contrary to or inconsistent with" the terms of the UCMJ, 10 U. S. C. §836(a), the jettisoning of so basic a right cannot lightly be excused as "practicable."
Under the circumstances, then, the rules applicable in courts-martial must apply. Since it is undisputed that Commission Order No. 1 deviates in many significant respects from those rules, it necessarily violates Article 36(b).
With respect to the Geneva Conventions, the Court held that Article 3-often called Common Article 3 as it is common to all four Geneva Conventions - applies even though the US is at war with al Qaeda, which is not a signatory to the conventions. The Court said:
Common Article 3, then, is applicable here and, as indicated above, requires that Hamdan be tried by a "regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples." 6 U. S. T., at 3320 (Art. 3, ¶1(d)). While the term "regularly constituted court" is not specifically defined in either Common Article 3 or its accompanying commentary, other sources disclose its core meaning. The commentary accompanying a provision of the Fourth Geneva Convention, for example, defines "'regularly constituted'" tribunals to include "ordinary military courts" and "definitely exclud[e] all special tribunals." GCIV Commentary 340 (defining the term "properly constituted" in Article 66, which the commentary treats as identical to "regularly constituted");64 see also Yamashita, 327 U. S., at 44 (Rutledge, J., dissenting) (describing military commission as a court "specially constituted for a particular trial"). And one of the Red Cross' own treatises defines "regularly constituted court" as used in Common Article 3 to mean "established and organized in accordance with the laws and procedures already in force in a country." Int'l Comm. of Red Cross, 1 Customary International Humanitarian Law 355 (2005); see also GCIV Commentary 340 (observing that "ordinary military courts" will "be set up in accordance with the recognized principles governing the administration of justice").
The Government offers only a cursory defense of Hamdan's military commission in light of Common Article 3. See Brief for Respondents 49-50. As Justice Kennedy explains, that defense fails because "[t]he regular military courts in our system are the courts-martial established by congressional statutes." Post, at 8 (opinion concurring in part). At a minimum, a military commission "can be 'regularly constituted' by the standards of our military justice system only if some practical need explains deviations from court-martial practice." Post, at 10. As we have explained, see Part VI-C, supra, no such need has been demonstrated here.65 ...
Common Article 3 obviously tolerates a great degree of flexibility in trying individuals captured during armed conflict; its requirements are general ones, crafted to accommodate a wide variety of legal systems. But requirements they are nonetheless. The commission that the President has convened to try Hamdan does not meet those requirements.
The Court also refused to grant the government's motion to dismiss the case based on the Detainee Treatment Act, part of which limits the ability of Guantanamo prisoners to challenge their detentions in federal courts, saying that Congress did not intend for the relevant DTA provision to apply to pending claims. The Court also specifically noted that it was not addressing "the Government's power to detain [Hamdan] for the duration of active hostilities in order to prevent such harm."
Read the Court's opinion per Justice Stevens, along with a concurrence from Justice Breyer, who was joined by Justices Kennedy, Souter and Ginsburg; a concurrence in part and dissent in part from Justice Kennedy, who was joined in part by Justices Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer; a dissent [text] from Justice Scalia, who was joined by Justices Thomas and Alito; a dissent from Justice Thomas, who was joined in full by Justice Scalia and in part by Justice Alito; and a final dissent from Justice Alito, who was joined in part by Justices Scalia and Thomas.
*+*
*+*
*`+´*
- "Brothel judge did not pay for sex", reported on 27th October 2006
An appeal court judge from Malmö who admitted visiting a brothel has got his job back after he sued his employer.
Malmö district court ruled that the judge had not committed a crime, because he did not actually pay for sex.
Dan Ogvall, one of the three judges who heard his case, told Expressen that the appeal court judge had "done nothing except for masturbating while a girl was next to him."
This does not count as sexual relations in Swedish law, according to the court, so the judge could not be guilty of paying for sex, it ruled.
The judge was caught last year, after police monitoring the brothel saw him enter.
The judge said he had previously signed an admission only to avoid publicity, and not because he thought that he had done anything wrong, he said.
The court on Friday agreed that he had not committed a crime, and ruled that the subsequent decision by the national disciplinary board for civil servants to fire him should therefore be reversed.
- I think this bastard judge didn't pay to his horny woman but I wonder how much he paid to the court staff?
- ...means?
- Court is brothel, I think so!
- I agree with you, because I know the main figures of Swedish court! They are the officially whores, only difference.
- Wonderful described!
*+*
- What about the Satellites of the ZOG?
- Which one, Sir?
- Swedish Kingdom.
- Well!.. This is a system, sect-dominated piece of the EU: s.c. DemocraZional Polit-Prost Brothel Swedish Kingdom
Stinky characters were been imported for kinky money, and they always prtoected by the the Zinoni-Sects, sometimes using pales like Fp etc legal-faced polit-instruments. Their Real God is Real Money; nothing else!..
USraeli Imperialism built on the bloody money and this Military Mafia still needs both whores&thieves!- I am fucking Swedish Kings, too!
- ...too. late! They have been fucked by the Evangelist Sect chiefs, completely in all the holes!
- Wow!
*+*
<lmg src=
>*+*
- "Rough justice as past and present ministers do battle", reported on 8th December 2006
A parliamentary feud between Sweden's previous and present justice ministers worsened today when former holder of the post, Thomas Bodström, walked out in the middle of a debate.
Bodström, who headed the justice ministry until the September general election, left the room immediately after posing some questions to current justice minister Beatrice Ask.
"I was a bit surprised. If you have a question you should listen to the answer. Otherwise don't ask.
But I suppose he wanted to make a point," Ask told news agency TT.
She says that she has never seen anything like it from a member of parliament.
"Never during a debate on questions raised in parliament, since they last such a short time," said Ask.
In the current minister's opinion, Bodström wants to demonstrate that she is a worse finance minister than he was.
"I really think it is that ridiculous. Bodström is finding it difficult to adjust to the role of opposition MP," said Ask.
Earlier this week Bodström accused Speaker of the House Per Westerberg of interrupting him during a debate and rescuing Ask from a tricky situation in the process.
Ask says that the speaker only interjected when Bodström had gone too far.
"I think I won that debate. Bodström's level of debate is low and he behaves irrationally," said Ask.
In his defence, Thomas Bodström says that he left the assembly to return to a meeting.
"I was in a meeting with the Security Service, which I interrupted to make a couple of contributions, and then I went back.
"It would have been impolite to keep them waiting.
"I had made my contributions and can read the replies in the minutes," said Bodström.
*`+´*
- You are talking on the Justitie Betrayal Cases! But who are the main scammers?
- There are many different cathegories in different countries... I show a short clip on USA!
- Let's watch!
*`+´*
- "43 Jewish Lawmakers in Congress", reported on 5 January 2007
Thirty Jewish members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 13 Jewish U.S. senators were sworn in yesterday as the Democrats took control of Congress for the first time in over a decade. The 43 Jewish lawmakers assuming office Thursday in the 110th Congress include 29 Democrats and one Republican in the House and nine Democrats, two Republicans and two independents who caucus with the Democrats in the Senate.
The number of Jewish senators sets a record; there were more than 30 Jewish House members between 1990 and 1994.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) posed at the swearing-in of Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), who used a Koran owned by Thomas Jefferson. Ellison is the first Muslim elected to Congress. An array of Jewish groups joined Arab-American and Muslim-American groups in condemning some right-wing assaults on Ellison’s decision to use the Koran.
Two Buddhists also were the first of their faith elected to Congress.
*+*
*`+´*
- We detect different laws value in the different times... There are protect laws what only DominaZional power needs...
- In Sweden too?
- Yes! There is specillay Jewish Mafia ordered rules, labelld: "Hets mot folkgrupp".
- Folk?! Swedish people?
- No! The thieves/plunderers counted as people. Swedish people can be only prisoners...
- I am not Jew. What should I do now to be improsoned in Sweden.
- Sat the truth what the Jews disliked...
- You are kidding! THE TRUTH DOES NOT NEED LAWS to protect it, only LIES NEED such laws
- Therefore Sweden has this strange law... Jewish lie machinery works there and this flock needs special laws
*`+´*
- Did you hear; Mari Ann ROOS's boy-friend was been justice minister in USA?
She looks like this...
- It's not strange, both cloakrats are working for USraeli aims nd BUSH loves similarly rats
*`+´*
Lawyers should act and show the evidences just after 11 September..
Unfortunately, all the Lawyers choosed to go in silence! Because their well-paid organizations for example ICJ (Int. Commisson of Jurists) working for sects. And all the sects were been well-credited duirng 11 September operations...
*´+´*
*`+´*
Zionists aim a kind "worldwide elimination", like this bloody panorama:
*`+´*
Jew Swindler Claims Jail “Reminds him of Holocaust” – Freed by Jew Judge, reported on 4 April 2007
A “Holocaust survivor” (!) living in Britain who claimed he experienced flashbacks to his war ordeal after he was jailed for his part in a £6.9million ($14million) money laundering operation was freed as an 'act of mercy'.
Since being incarcerated five weeks ago, 76-year-old Mendel Rand, originally from Poland, had relived daily the trauma of being kept hidden from the Nazis in horrible conditions as a boy, the Court of Appeal heard.
Jew Judge Mr Justice Openshaw accepted that 'the wretched old man' had suffered enough punishment for his involvement in the crime which had brought shame to his family and disgraced him in the eyes of his strict community of Hasidic Jews. "The resultant shame will no doubt bring a heavy burden for him to carry for the rest of his life," said the judge. "We think, as an act of mercy, he should be allowed to go free."
Rand's 18-month prison term was replaced with a two-year suspended sentence. Rand was convicted in November 2004 of a money laundering conspiracy, which involved helping cigarette smugglers dispose of the proceeds of their crime.
Jew laywer Jonathan Goldberg QC, appearing for Rand, called on the appeal judges in London to suspend his client's sentence in an 'act of compassion'. He said a rabbi from Rand's community, who had visited him in jail, said his incarceration was 'bringing back nightmares of his war experience as a young man'.
A report to the court said Rand, of Golders Green, North London, was an 'old and frail man who had experienced severe trauma in his lifetime' and was having flashbacks about the war. Openshaw said that when Rand's parents were arrested in Krakow during the Second World War, their son was kept hidden from the Nazis by a sympathiser 'often in cellars in the cold and dark, often under-nourished and, of course, in constant fear of capture'.
"This experience has cast a pall over his whole life," the judge added. "Now he daily relives the experience."
The judge, sitting with Mr Justice Walker, heard that Rand was a businessman held in high esteem before his conviction. However the judge noted that Rand's standing in the community was what enabled him to play a key role in laundering the proceeds of cigarette smuggling, as his legitimate business contacts allowed him to move large sums of money 'without raising suspicion'.
On August 7, 2002, Rand was observed picking up a holdall in Newcastle which he dropped off in Manchester at the home of the man who was believed to be leading the cigarette smuggling conspiracy. Customs officers struck and recovered £220,000 inside. They then found a ledger at Rand's home detailing entries appearing to correspond with the movement of £6.9million over eight months. The judge said Rand appeared to earn a commission of £63,000.
Media Link
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=445754&in_page_id=1766&ito=1490
*`+´*
- Not only "Jurist-weared fake NGOs/ICJ-copied sects" or Jusek-called fraud handlers... There are the Kangaroo Courts of capitalist systems
for example Jew dominated Sweden's administrative courts (Länsrätten and Kammarrätten) working like the Notarius Publicus under Zionist lobbies...
*`+´*
Växjö Tingrätt is Tel Aviv maffians WC?
, .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....~
- It smells anything strange here! Not only false "democratic-weared/Justice-seeker" leagues! HumanRightsDefender (labelled) organizations are blind, too; when criminals are the sect members/connected to anty Jewish lobby! Not only HumanRights' scammers, even AnimalRights actors are playing similarly shitty screenplays! Animal-saver NGOs are going in silence! What is the reason? There are several oragniazations all together etiquetted themselves as "Animal Rights" defenders, but they never protested "Animal Misuser Capitalists"?
- Unfortunately! It's reality! It's a pity!
- - What should HUMAN do?
- GIVE NO MONEY to THESE "HUMANIST MASKED" monsters! Don't support such SYSTEM(-atically betrayal)-MOUSETRAPS! Give no money to Animal Rights gangs/Red Cross/Amnesty International/ICJ etc sect charlatans, 'cause these organizations completely turned to be freak components of Imperialist system...
- But there are very good persions, too..
- Good person don't need to use mask! If there a single one REAL HUMANIST, so he should work not for money! A real Hum,anist works not for his own profitees, but for humanbeing!
-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
Jurist-weared scammers of ICJ/Jusek etc organizations (Swedish-ID holöder Jews in Sweden) were been angry when we show these fotos:
(Guess, now; what is the reason that such jurists choose to go blind around real execution scenes!)
I see here two different kind of shame:
one of the cruelty; open-air Jewish barbarity..
Secomnd one cruelty; Jewish whores doanimating all kind institutions and organisations in satellit countries; unfortunately, Swexden is most infected area.
- It's true! Swedish people is working like donkey, Jews swallowing everything there like wild pigs. JUSEK and ICJ are simply pig farms; nothiung else!
-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
Recommended books for independent brains:
THE LAW
Frederick Bastiat
1998 Edition of the nineteenth century classic by French economist Frederick Bastiat who warned of inflation and the impending roots of socialism -- a must for every high school and college economics student. Former President Ronald Reagan referred to Bastiat as one of his sources for his economic policy. 98 pages.
- I couldn't find this book in TelaAviv and even no any staff gave info at the Swedish Royal Library!
- It's not strange, 'cause SweCIA Kingdom is not a kind real democratic state; Swedish Kingdom turned to a satellite labb of the ZOG
- What does ZOG mean?
- Bordello, runs by the Zionist lobbies! It works for animalo fellings, I can describe so: if you have dirty money, so you allowed to get everything, contains Lena POSNÉR-KÖRÖSI's cunt! But if you want to read this book, wow! You'll be stopped! No! It's prohibited weapen even you pay for such useful books! Because it's useful for independent brains, not useful for Jews. Otherway, Zionist impeerialism hates and eliminates independent intellectuals!
- ?!
-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
Why Are Rove and Gonzales Leaving?
Commented by Jeff Davis on 7 September 2007
The resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has been all over every newspaper, television network and Internet site. The son of illegal aliens, Alberto Gonzales approved torture, secret prisons, warrantless wiretaps and undermining the Right of habeas corpus. Our Third World Attorney General did everything he could to transform our judicial system into that of a Third World police state.
First off, this is the second one of Bush’s inner circle to jump ship in two weeks, the first being Karl Rove. These are not White House lightweights like all those small fry that fell on their swords at the Justice Department when the U. S. Attorney-firing scandal first broke. These are major-league neocon players. Up until a few weeks ago, I would have said you’d have to pry them out of this administration with a crowbar to remove them.
There was in fact no need for either of them to leave. Rove was holed up in the White House, inaccessible and surrounded with a force field of invincibility for almost seven years, and his status never changed. There was no way Congress or anyone else could have gotten to him with Gonzales in the chair at Justice. Either Rove voluntarily left, or he had some falling out with Bush or Cheney that was so serious he was forced out.
Ditto Gonzales himself. Alberto lied bare-faced to Congress, everyone in the country knew it, and they did –nothing. A few Congressmen spluttered in impotent rage; Bush ignored them, and that was it. This Congress doesn’t have the backbone for impeachment and everybody knows it. The neocons may stage some kind of “national emergency” as an excuse to cancel the 2008 elections. Anything is possible with the gang of traitors in power today. This is why impeachment was so necessary, yet the new Congress of 2006 chose to do nothing.
Curiously Gonzales was in fact essential in preventing any serious criminal probes or contempt of Congress charges, since contempt of Congress cases are enforced by–the U. S. Attorney General and the Justice Department. Bush needed him. So why is he gone?
Why did they leave? Two possibilities.
The first possibility is that Gonzales was forced out by Bush and Cheney and the neocons after being a colossal embarrassment for many months. It seems likely Gonzales’ goal may have been to block investigations for as long as possible by focusing all the attention on himself until it became “too late” to impeach Bush and Cheney.
The second possibility is that the neocons are planning something that is so ghastly, so dangerous, so criminal, so vile, that even these two completely amoral men couldn’t stomach it and want to distance themselves from it, even if it means losing their immediate shielding from prosecution. That’s scary, when two consummate political criminals would rather risk prison than hang around in this administration and be associated with whatever it’s planning.
-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
"Jewish Extremist Torture Advocate is now the U.S. Attorney General", reported by DavidDUKE.com tv on 9 November 2007
Jewish Extremist Torture Advocate is now the U.S. Attorney General
A radical Jewish supremacist and advocate of torture, Michael Mukasey has been confirmed by the U.S. Senate as America’s new Attorney General.
When asked by the Senate committee if he would permit “waterboarding”, or the terrorizing of accused suspects by partially drowning them, Mukasey stated that is “not sure” if such treatment is torture. ????
The American Justice system led by Mukasey is now is completely in line with the Jewish Bolsheviks who ran the biggest torture and killing apparatus in the history of the world, Soviet Communism. He also is in line with the long-standing torture policies of Israel. NY Times writer, Alan Greenberg, conservatively estimates that Israel tortures 6,000 Palestinians a year.
Mukasey has also been very instrumental in the cover up of Israeli involvement in 911 and the of Israeli Mossad agents who were caught filming and cheering the 911 attacks as they occured. Mukasey, along with Jewish extremist, Michael Chertoff, permitted dozens of Israeli spies captured in the wake of 911 who were shown to have been shadowing the hijackers — to go back to Israel outside the reach of Congressional investigation.
Mukasey’s clear endorsement of torture caused a significant number of senators to vote against his confirmation. What put Mukasey over the top in the Senate was the support of supposedly liberal Jews such as Schumer and Feinstein. In the end, Jews can frequently be counted on to support their fellows no matter what the circumstances.
It is amazing that in a society that tells us repeatedly that everyone is an individual and you shouldn’t necessarily support your own race or group, Jews routinely put their group loyalty above everything else, but no public figrues have the guts to expose this obvious fact. it is easy for radical Jews to dominate a society when powerful extremist Jews in government, media and finance support each other and the Jewish agenda (such as the catastrophic Iraq War) while everyone else is divided and compromised.
The appointment of a torture advocate, Jewish extremist as the chief law enforcement officer of the United States has to be a new low for America. We have radical, extremist Jews as head of the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Reserve, World Bank, and controlling the President of the United States as if he were a puppet on a string.
God Save America!
Dr. David Duke
www.davidduke.com
-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
"Nuremburg War Crimes Trials: Run by Jews, said American Prosecutor", reported on 3 December 2007
The infamous Nuremburg “War Crimes Trials” where top Nazi leaders were charged – and found guilty -- after World War Two, has been confirmed as a Jew-run set up by non other than one of the leading gentile American prosecutors at the trial, Thomas Dodd.
In a new book, issued by Dodd’s son, Christopher, called Letters from Nuremberg: My Father's Narrative of a Quest for Justice, Dodd senior’s opinion of the Jews at Nuremburg is revealed in a series of private letters back to his wife during the trials themselves:
“There are too many Jews around here. Col. Kaplan is now here, as a mate I assume for Commander Kaplan. Dr. Newman has arrived... it is all a silly business,” Dodd, who would emerge as second in command on the American prosecution team wrote. On September 25, 1945, he wrote:
"You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge -- you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial -- for their own sake.
"For -- mark this well -- the charge 'a war for the Jews' is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again.
"The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter --it is distasteful to me -- but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else."
In one of the most dramatic moments of this trial, Dodd was the one presenting to the world with a shrunken head of a Polish prisoner. The photo depicting him holding this dreadful piece of evidence is still memorable (illustration). It was alleged that the head was used as a paper holder at the office of a Nazi officer – but even this has long since been exposed as a fake.
-.. , .~-
{(*`.,´*)\
.....,~*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright©Tv Independent Laponia///Banned books tv arranged series/®All rights reserved///International English language version of the Saga: Juridical (official) scam/Banned books nr.114
Daryl BRADFORD documentary clips
