<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

300rwkw good or bad?

June 23 2006 at 11:31 PM
No score for this post
Anonymous  (no login)
from IP address 220.101.94.240

 
Hey guys just dynoed my car.FJ20 just with forgies the rest of the engine is internally standared.Custom exhaust manifold and turbo,injectors,computer, pump etc etc.On 25psi made 300rwkw with a fat as mixture.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Dave
(no login)
210.49.155.30

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 23 2006, 11:46 PM 

Does "fat as mixture" mean a fully sick awesome mixture or do you mean with a safe, rich mixture?

Sounds like a good result in anyones book!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
202.93.98.93

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 23 2006, 11:53 PM 

What do you call "safe" rich mixture , I call 10:1 filty rich and 12-12.5:1 good . A "rich " mixture is no safer than the correct mixture , lean mixtures do the damage . Actually very rich mixtures promote detonation .

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
220.101.94.240

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 24 2006, 12:15 AM 

mixture was around 10.5.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Boosted frog
(no login)
220.245.180.133

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 24 2006, 10:47 AM 

Post the dyno sheet.

10.5 is a bit rich for 25 psi. You dont need to go that low though many tuners do. Its costing you a bit of power. Aim for 11-11.5.

So yeah rich. Whos the tuner?

400rwhp....is it good? Dam straight. What fuel?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
220.101.94.240

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 24 2006, 5:47 PM 

fuel was c16 and i am tuning the car myself

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Gareth
(no login)
203.29.152.23

tuning

No score for this post
June 25 2006, 10:18 AM 

300kw is great but with what turbo... if its a fairly small turbo.. thats awesome, if its a big lung you got hangin off the side, there should be plenty more in it. lean it out to 11 - 11.5 as frog has said, and what ignition timing are you running? should be able to run 16-20 degress.

Gareth

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
202.93.98.93

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 26 2006, 1:41 PM 

25lbs is LOT of boost for 400Hp , you can get the same for less on pump fuel with the right bits .

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
220.101.93.39

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 26 2006, 5:44 PM 

what power have you made with "THE RIGHT BITS" on a FJ20 with no internall work but the forgies.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
202.93.98.93

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 26 2006, 9:07 PM 

I didn't have to because I watched others do it . You would be surprised what a good used internally std FJ20ET can crank out . The tune has to be perfect and the fueling/ECU/intercooling/everything downstream of the exhaust ports made to suit but its not rocket science so don't think your Neil Armstrong .
200 Hp per litre is easy from a big bore short stroke engine with a DOHC 16 valve head that actually works . The fact that these things are very robust and have reasonably aggressive for production camshafts makes it a straightforward process .

Provided the inlet system can pass/pump/intercool without loss 42-44Lbs air its no sewat . A half reasonable 1.5" bore steam pipe manifold and a turbo capable of passing and using 26 odd Lbs exhaust flow and bobs your uncle .

You need to understand that high boost does not necessarily mean high airflow . Boost pressure is actually a measure of resistanceto airflow into the engine nothing more . If the restrictions in the system are removed the flow goes up and the pressure down - simple physics .

Allen Engineering in Mallala (SA) did similar sort of Hp about 12 yrs ago with a HKS exhaust manifold and a TO4B turbo . From memory ignition was a MSD 6a , ecu an Autronic SMC and injectors I think Rochesters . A friend of mine did it 7 yrs ago with a steam pipe manifold and his own hybrid bush bearing turbo .

If you can get similar inlet and exhaust manifold pressure in your engine with the 42 odd Lbs airflow and effective support systems its a walk in the park . Now that 100 octane pump fuel is available its easier now than its ever been .

I too am interested to know what turbo and support systems you have to warrant that boost level . Less boost means less fuel rail pressure and more advance because a higher detonation threshold allows more efficient combustion .

Cheers .

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
220.101.93.39

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 26 2006, 10:09 PM 

so how much power have you actually made?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
202.93.98.93

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 26 2006, 10:47 PM 

The most power I've had is 4020 (3000Kw) from a GE 7FDL V16 turbo diesel , to self load test these things you don't need a dyno . Four of them in a row work even better .

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
220.101.93.39

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 27 2006, 5:47 PM 

well, it looks like YOUR Neil Armstrong!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
202.93.98.93

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
June 27 2006, 8:30 PM 

Nope , the yanks have had them for ages , Neil as well .

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
220.101.93.152

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
July 12 2006, 10:23 PM 

Mate,to me it sounds like your a profesor,what have you built or are just one of those guys that reads to many books?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Anonymous
(no login)
202.93.98.93

Re: 300rwkw good or bad?

No score for this post
July 16 2006, 11:38 AM 

No not really , my last of 2 FJET's was a torque monster more that a Kw mountain because thats what works in a road car .

The next will be an RB26 headed RB31 with the torque treatment because its also for road . If you know how you can have heaps of torque and good consumption .

The following will be a Daihatsu HDEG De Tomasso 1600 again for road .

I don't build semi race engines for road use because they are expensive and impracticle . If you use all the power you end up dead or in goal , if you don't seriously race it on a circuit or strip what was the point of the exercise .

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Current Topic - 300rwkw good or bad?  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2010 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement