.
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

J & J spoiler contained

March 9 2005 at 7:06 AM
Renee 

 
On the Television Without Pity forum (which I found through a link on The Connotator), an allegedly reliable spoiler (Trainman) posted this:

On the Jennifer/Jack situation: Yes, that is another woman, a DiMera operative disguised as Jennifer. Next week, she will reveal her true face...look up an actress named "Michelle Pierce" in the IMDB if you want to see a picture, although she doesn't look quite so Glamour Shots-y on the show (I don't think links work properly inside spoiler tags).

I hope I did this whole posting a spoiler thing correctly. I guess Trainman had a spolier a couple of weeks ago about Smitty picking up Jack 100 miles from Salem, etc., so people are fearing that this is a "real deal" spioler. Makes you wonder if the switch is permanent, where is the real Jennifer, and when the switch took place? I hate this.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
MileenaWins

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 9 2005, 1:15 PM 

This guy does the closed-captioning for Days and ys, he has been accurate.

makes a face A FauxJennifer? Oh come ON. Who do we have to bribe, threaten or sleep with to get a normal show?

 
 Respond to this message   
Erica

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 9 2005, 1:30 PM 

I like that comment Mileena!

Anyhow I was wondering...since Jack & "Jennifer" made love and Tony's plan is to destroy all of Salem's couples what if this "Jennifer" ends up being pregnant with Jack's baby in order to turn the real Jennifer against Jack? Just a thought.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sweetie

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 9 2005, 3:36 PM 

Yes, I have heard that Trainman is accurate. Sometimes the Television witout pity site blacks out spoilers so you are lucky you saw it!

Not really Jennifer. Of course not. That would actually make a FEW people happy! I'm sure she will end up pregnant. I am so hating this show. I am literally days away from NEVER watching it again!

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 9 2005, 5:52 PM 

Didn't he do this on Passions?

 
 Respond to this message   

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 9 2005, 11:24 PM 

can you please post the address for the site you got this on. I would like to visit it. Thank you in advance

 
 Respond to this message   
CalAggie

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 10 2005, 10:29 AM 


the poster is the one who blacks out the spoilers, it is part of the forum's netiquette, to do so you put

brackets (the word spoiler) then brackets (the slasher sign) (the word spoiler.)

This link gets you to soap index:
http://forums.televisionwithoutpity.com/index.php?showforum=489

BE WARNED there is positively, absolutely no censorship for language; because of the state of the show people are very verbal and use very colorful when referring to everyone's favorite hack.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sweetie

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 11 2005, 12:02 PM 

Okay I guess I'm really stupid on this, but I STILL don't understand blacking out spoilers. It just isn't trainman who blacked his out, but all references to what he said-- even comments by other people.

Why would someone post the spoilers and then go in and black out everything he had said and everything anyone else had said. It doesn't seem like you could edit someone else's post. It looks much more like censorship by a monitor on the site.

I'm not questioning how someone would do this, but WHY.

 
 Respond to this message   
Renee

blacked out spoiler

March 11 2005, 3:05 PM 

I just highlighted the blacked out text with my mouse, and I could read it. Dumb luck, but it worked.

 
 Respond to this message   
Sweetie

Re: blacked out spoiler

March 11 2005, 6:31 PM 

Thanks so much Renee! I don't know why or how that works, but it sure does!

 
 Respond to this message   
SB

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 10 2005, 1:09 PM 

from what I've heard, there wasn't a switch with the real Jennifer but that Jack is in some faux Salem (yet another? I know, it's getting far stretched). Not sure if this is true or not, just the rumors I've heard.

 
 Respond to this message   
nuck

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 11 2005, 8:35 AM 

I am going with the Jennifer/switch theory,, instead of Faux Salem. When he heard a car outside,, he saw Jennifer walking up to the door looking in her purse for keys,(wouldnt they have been on the key ring she drove with) anyways,,i digress,, yet "Jennifer" was in the kitchen getting coffee. Then, when he looked outside again she was gone. I am thinking they did the switch, "real" Jen came home, but probably was abducted in the driveway.

 
 Respond to this message   
nuck

Re: J & J spoiler contained

March 11 2005, 9:18 AM 

Ok,, so it is a fake Jen,, the real Jen comes in the back door,, and they have a series of near misses.. lol.. what a surprise there! Not sure if they are going to be able to make this a good story line or not,, but right now I am just enjoying that JACK IS BACK!

 
 Respond to this message   

Looking Good

March 11 2005, 4:48 PM 

He, certainly, looks good to me!!! Go Jack Go!!!

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: Looking Good

March 11 2005, 7:14 PM 


Jack is far sexier than the shirtless loser. Jack's body looks sexy and realistic, not artificial like Patricks!

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: Looking Good

March 12 2005, 12:17 AM 

there is nothing wrong with Patrick other than he is on a stupid-ass show!

 
 Respond to this message   
CalAggie

Re: Looking Good

March 12 2005, 11:10 AM 


Sadly Ty Treadway auditioned for the part, now had he been Patrick I would have been a fan -- as long as he stayed away from Jennifer, and Hope.

 
 Respond to this message   

Thanks For Sharing

March 12 2005, 7:52 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - J & J spoiler contained
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement