| Original Message |
St George (no login)
Posted Oct 24, 2003 12:46 AM
I'm very sorry that I seemed to have offended you somewhat by using the name St George, but as a full blooded Englishman I happen to be very proud of our patron saint, so I'm afraid you'll just have to continue to feel offended or perhaps inferior, who knows.
Now, the statement you make regarding that the people in the north (I assume you mean England) have Viking dna but in the south they have Saxon, I concede may well be true. Incidently though, I am very happy that you have made that statement because by doing so, you have just, in effect, admitted that there ARE biological differences between the races. Thank you.
However, the differences between the white, European races are so miniscule that in reality, it makes no difference whatsoever when two of these separate groups come into contact with each other, inter-marry and ultimately breed. This is a very much different case however, when the white race happens to intermingle with the negro race for example, whose biological dna vastly differs from that of the afore mentioned white race. If only it were a matter of colour, I'm sure it would be completely overlooked and rightly so. To want to be able to live seperately from a certain group purely because of their colour would be total stupidity and would deserve contemp. But I happen to believe that there is much, much more to it than merely colour and it should at least be discussed in the open.
Now, you also pointed out that the Vikings themselves have been proven to have come from further east in what is now Russia. This statement also contains some truth but I would like to expand on it a little more if I may. It was not only the Vikings who happend to descend from Russia, but ALL of the white, European race happen to have their origins in that country. To be a little more exact, it was specificly a region in south, central modern day Russia known as the Caucasus mountains. Hence, even today, white Europeans are sometimes referred to as Caucasians. This one area happens to hold the secrets of the earliest origins of the white race known to man.
You are correct in pointing out that SOME biologists parade the theory that all human life bagan in Africa, although I have to add this theory is not universal and many are split on the subject. There happens to be still very much that is uncertain at present. This science is still relatively young and there is much to learn on the subject. In any case, even if these theories are correct and all human life was born in Africa, these same people also insist that sometime, hundreds of thousands of years ago, some people migrated north and spent the next few hundred thousand years evolving totaly seperately from the other human species still in Africa.
Lastly, St. George was a Turk? Did you know him personally? I also read somewhere that he was a Palestinian. Perhaps he was an Australian aboriginie, who knows. To me though, he was a mythical character who slayed an evil dragon and he's the patron saint of my great country. He is a figurehead, a noble warrior, who stands tall and proud protecting England's honour with his strength and might. There is no invader to these lands that he fears. The truth will be his ultimate weapon.
Thank you my friend for affording me further opportunity to spread yet more truth on this site.
Many regards,
St George
P.S. perhaps he was a Turk after all, seeing as their are many, many other Turks out there who also share the name George.
Cheers! |
|
|