Respond to this messageReturn to Index
Original Message
  • Demand for school places
    • Peter Markham (no login)
      Posted Jun 9, 2012 7:53 AM

      The idea that the demand for primary school places can have radically changed within a year is laughable. It is far more likely that LCC were reluctant to pay for teacher's salaries. Even before Elsea Park was built Guy Cudmore was telling us our two schools had a far higher roll count than anywhere else in the county. Authority have been in Denial.

      I also recall something Bob said here 5 years ago. That all our expectant mums have to trudge off to Peterborough to find a maternity unit. He suggested that statistically all those births were counted in Cambridgeshire, not Lincolnshire.

      The Elsea Park school should have been built when the first houses were built.

      But why was the planning gain agreed only for a primary school? The town will, perforce, need the same number of secondary places. Who is going to pay for that? Will that decision be left too late too?

      We really do employ a legion of jack-asses to run our affairs, don't we?
    Login Status
  • You are not logged in
    • Login
      Password
       

      Optional
      Provides additional benefits such as notifications, signatures, and user authentication.


      Create Account
    Your Name
    Your Email
    (Optional)
    Message Title
    Message Text
    Options Enable formatted text (Huh?)
    Also send responses to my email address
     
    Notice: This is a moderated forum. Your post will not show up until a moderator approves the message. If you regularly have full posting privileges, you may have to login first.
          


    Find more forums on Cities & NeighborhoodsCreate your own forum at Network54
     Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement