Rules of Negotiation and Our Demands:

1) Make us laugh. Or die trying.
2) Don't be surprised if you find yourself verbally pistol-whipped. It's all in the spirit of fun.
3) We want a helicopter...because hostage takers always ask for one in the movies, right? We don't ride no stinkin' buses. If you don't have a helicopter, make rotor noises by thumping on your chest while you linger, at least.
4) Don't be surprised if a cheese monkey mistakes you for a mate while you make rotor noises. Feed the cheese monkey at your own peril.
5) We're out of cheese. Bring cheese.
6) Papi's rule: Refrain from using the word "pussy" during negotiations, or risk the wrath of a scrawny Texan.
7) Take the feuding and flaming elsewhere. We're kinder, gentler hostage takers.
8) We want lots of bubble wrap. Stand-offs can be a bitch.
9) Run your cat through the shredder before entering. There's nothing like the sound of a screeching cat to break the tension.
10) Tell the SWAT team to keep their distance. But you're welcome to join in if you're new here. Don't be shy!

 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Sanity Held Hostage  

Signs

August 17 2002 at 3:03 PM
No score for this post
  (no login)
from IP address 12.90.169.193

 
Has anyone else seen this movie?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.218.237

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 17 2002, 4:01 PM 

Nope..as usual, I'll wait until it comes on cable in a year or so. It's supposed to be really good though from people I know that saw it. It HAS to be better than M Night Shyamalan's last flick, Unbreakable. It's good to hear he's back on track. Why Mel instead of Bruce this time?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.187

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 17 2002, 8:04 PM 


I want to see this movie, it looks good.
Mel has much prettier eyes than Bruce.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.219.218

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 18 2002, 2:24 PM 

So you're saying M Night Shyamalan has a thing for Mel?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.186

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 18 2002, 8:02 PM 

No just his eyes.

I would love to have pictures of Mel's eyes for my Iridology files.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.219.93

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 18 2002, 8:13 PM 

I guess collecting pictures of eyes is less creepy than collecting actual eyeballs..but not by much. Weirdo.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.186

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 18 2002, 8:18 PM 


That is right I am not a total weirdo!!

I am an Iridologist, and that is what an Iridologist does, looks into people's eyes.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.219.93

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 18 2002, 8:22 PM 

But most don't keep files for personal pleasure.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.186

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 18 2002, 8:25 PM 


I didn't say it was for pleasure now did I?
I just want to check the status of his health.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.219.93

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 18 2002, 8:29 PM 

Among other things, I'm sure. Mel's fine, don't worry! Sheesh..you've never shown an interest in anyone's eyes here.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.62

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 19 2002, 8:13 PM 


Well we just never got on the subject of eyes before I guess. I have always looked at people's eyes, even before I became an Iridologist. For some people, their eyes are easier to "read" than their body language as far as what they are thinking or what type of person lurks inside them.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.216.67

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 19 2002, 8:55 PM 

[puts on his shades] You're not looking into my soul, devil woman.

It doesn't take an iridologist to know what a man is thinking, and I'll bet a male iridologist couldn't come close to figure out what a woman's really thinking.


    
This message has been edited by bawdy from IP address 67.68.213.32 on Aug 21, 2002 2:44 PM
This message has been edited by bawdy from IP address 67.68.213.32 on Aug 21, 2002 2:40 PM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.216.67

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 19 2002, 9:01 PM 

Anyway..if you looked into my eyes, you'd probably want to check my pulse to see if I was the walking dead.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.171

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 20 2002, 9:07 PM 


Oh I don't think so. I think I would see the lines of perversion.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.213.32

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 21 2002, 2:47 PM 

Check out your own eyes in the mirror before you start casting stones. heh

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.85

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 21 2002, 8:38 PM 


I have checked my own eyes several times.
I am not throwing stones, if I were you would be yelling ouch....or "more"....heh

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.85

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 21 2002, 8:52 PM 


You look so good in those shades....

I love it when you call me devil woman!!! evil grin

I don't think any man of any profession can know what a woman is really thinking!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(no login)
67.68.213.11

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 22 2002, 3:11 PM 

What do your eyes tell you? Run!!!?

Ooh..I haven't had a good rock fight since I was a kid. Maybe it's for the best we had snow for half the year though.

You can't use asterisks to surround action sequences on this board. They automatically put the text in italics. From here on out, I decree we use square brackets instead.

[whips a rock at Candy's head]

[rock shatters]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.252

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 22 2002, 4:47 PM 


My eyes tell me that my left kidney has had too much to deal with over the years. Exactly over the kidney area of my left eye are the words "NO MORE PARTIES"
They also tell my my stomach is shot. Both eyes say
"Forget Trying to Digest Anything ever Again"
Directly on top of the pupil is a yellow warning sign that says "We are warning you, the kidney's are going to quit".

You know you really need a board that accepts asterisks. Brackets are not as pleasing to the eye.

You didn't know my magical powers could shatter the rock before it got to me did you?? evil grin

Ha!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.213.188

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 22 2002, 6:22 PM 

Sheesh..you have two kidneys, so stop whining already. If need be, we'll rip one out of a homeless guy and give you a transplant.

Ha..after being told, you still went ahead and used asterisks.

You're magical powers are useless against rocks from the Canadian Shield!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.252

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 22 2002, 7:11 PM 


Did you think I wouldn't use asterisks??

You asked me what I seen in my eyes, and then said I was whinning about it. That is so typical of a male. tsk tsk.


Canadian sheild.....ha! Canada loves me, I bring american money with me!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.218.13

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 22 2002, 7:51 PM 

Well, I figured you'd use common sense and stop using asterisks since they don't display the intended result. Typical of a woman not to listen.

Did you consider the possibility that your eyes are pulling your leg?

Rocks know not of money!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.229

FarfromTypical

No score for this post
August 22 2002, 8:42 PM 


Just because I decided I liked italics doesn't mean I wasn't listening.

Rocks may not care about money but border patrol loves me.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.229

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 22 2002, 9:29 PM 


Nope my eyes aren't pulling my leg. I had some tests run. They tell me the left kidney is failing to do it's job. Guess I am going to have to get tough with it.
Can't be havin no slackers!


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.217.7

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 23 2002, 2:52 PM 

You go through customs for the sole purpose of getting frisked.

I'll start scouting homeless people immediately.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.250

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 23 2002, 7:52 PM 


There is no need for you to look for homeless people unless of course you are looking for a date....


Ooohhhh that burned didn't it? LOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.217.133

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 23 2002, 8:21 PM 

I've been practicing transplants by playing Operation. Don't spoil my fun by being a scaredy cat.

No luck with homeless people. Next up..corpses!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.245

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 24 2002, 9:02 PM 


You play operation too? I thought I heard something buzzing!!

Come on now you know you just like to hang out in cemetaries!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.219.45

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 25 2002, 2:41 PM 

I play Operation. I didn't say I was good at it. Don't worry, you don't run on batteries, so I assure you there will be no buzzing when I take out your kidney.

I don't like hanging out in cemetaries! [looks at you with a grave face]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.170.161

Signs

No score for this post
August 30 2002, 7:20 AM 

I hate to admit this but, am I the only one who thinks that Mel overacts sometimes?

I prefer Bruce any day.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.212.246

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 30 2002, 3:36 PM 

I'd say Mel only overacts when doing comedy (Lethal Weapon, What A Woman Wants). His facial expressions get exaggerated. I say Bruce underacted in Unbreakable. They're both usually good though.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.140

Signs

No score for this post
August 30 2002, 11:17 PM 


Then there is Lou Diamond Phillips, (is that one l or 2?) who doesn't overact or underact..........

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.169.89

Bruce in Unbreakable

No score for this post
August 31 2002, 8:31 AM 

Bruce did not underact. First, he was a cartoon character, supposed to be flat and sort of emotionless. Second, there were emotional scenes cut from the movie that really were needed....but it was too long I guess. I've seen the deleted scenes and they were some of the ones that would have added some depth to Bruce's character. However, the intent was to make him 2 dimensional like a comic book hero.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.212.144

Re: Signs

No score for this post
August 31 2002, 2:33 PM 

Lou Diamond Phillips? I count three "l"s. I heard they're thinking of renaming the Oscar to the Diamond award and the statuette will bear Lou's likeness.

I know Bruce's role was a somber one in Unbreakable. He could have just mailed in his performance because it didn't require depth. Maybe it was out of his hands that scenes were cut. The film definitely needed to give us a reason to care about his character. I just think it's a joke that some people I've talked to tout this as a great movie. They might have tried to make it great, but they failed.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.168.183

The movie, Unbreakable

No score for this post
September 1 2002, 9:02 AM 

This movie can only be effective if you get it. In other words, a comic book character CANNOT have dimension. This is what the movie was about. Bruce had no hand in it, some of the better scenes were actually cut. I mean, nothing can outdo his role as Malcolm in Sixth Sense, he was SO excellent, controlled but emotional....I loved it. However, Unbreakable has it's moments, it's not as good a movie at all.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.212.46

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 1 2002, 2:41 PM 

It's not that I don't get it. I just found the premise and story to be flawed. The use or symbolism could have and should have been more subtle.

Besides, if comic book characters really did exist, they wouldn't be two dimensional now would they?

Hell, they would have known he was "unbreakable" when they tried to vaccinate or circumcise him.

As a star football player, he would have tested his limits in the weight room in high school-not when his son pushes him in his forties.

What really made me roll my eyes was when he ended up in the swimming pool during his first super hero rescue. Who didn't see that coming?

I just didn't buy into any of it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.168.194

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 1 2002, 8:25 PM 

All those things you mentioned have NOTHING to do with Bruce. They are PLOT FLAWS...and he's an actor who did well with what he had.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.213.50

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 2 2002, 3:11 PM 

I didn't say they had anything to do with Bruce. I was just elaborating on some of the problems I had with the movie. There are more.

I think a zombie could have just as easily played that role. I'm just saying it wasn't a challenge. And I think when it comes to dramatic acting, Mel and Bruce are both very good.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.170.173

They are both good

No score for this post
September 3 2002, 7:13 AM 

but Bruce is better. At times during Mel's scenes I realize that he's acting, he appears fake. In Bruce's movies, I totally forget that he is acting.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.217.122

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 3 2002, 1:23 PM 

I don't think Bruce has ever been nominated for an Academy Award though. Has he? If so, I've forgotten about it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.168.188

I know I know

No score for this post
September 4 2002, 1:03 AM 

The Academy does not like Bruce. He's clearly a conservative and does not fit in with their "cliques"

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.217.8

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 4 2002, 1:19 PM 

It's not like their judgment is that great anyway. Voting members don't necessarily even watch all the performances in categories they vote for-and that's just not right. Someone else they snub is Jim Carrey. To win Golden Globe awards yet not even get nominated for an Academy Award? What a joke.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.167.187

Jim Carrey...?

No score for this post
September 5 2002, 12:57 AM 

An Academy Award? Why?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.216.239

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 5 2002, 3:25 PM 

His portrayal of Andy Kaufman. He deserved consideration for The Truman Show as well, I think.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.41

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 5 2002, 7:49 PM 


Have to agree about the Andy Kaufman thing. Who else could have played the role of Andy Kaufman? That would have been a tough part for most actors.
Where as I am not so sure Truman was Academy Award material, it was a good movie. I also like Mask!
Jim Carrey is good at what he does in my humble opinion.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Shorti
(no login)
12.90.171.58

Absolutely not

No score for this post
September 5 2002, 10:06 PM 

He's not a dramatic actor, sorry. I loved Truman Show but it's not an Oscar winning performance.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.151

Absolutely not

No score for this post
September 6 2002, 12:49 PM 


There is enough drama in the news everyday.....
I'll take a good comedy anytime!
Bruce nor Mel nor anyone else I can think of off hand could have done the Andy Kaufman story.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.212.64

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 6 2002, 2:35 PM 

Mask? What's the Cher movie have to do with this? It's The Mask.

I didn't say he deserved to win for the Truman Show, but I think a nomination was possibly warranted. If not for that, definitely for Man in the Moon. His portrayal of Andy Kaufman was very convincing. In my opinion he's proven he can be a dramatic actor-which is probably easier than being a good comic actor.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Candy
(no login)
209.153.172.11

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 6 2002, 8:25 PM 


Calm down dear I was agreeing with you!
Forgive me for my overlooking the "The"...I am old you know.
Heck I would nominate Betty White for her part in Lake Placid!
I think Jim Carrey is good, and he played Andy Kaufman like no one else could have.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login bawdy)
Forum Owner
67.68.219.45

Re: Signs

No score for this post
September 7 2002, 2:02 PM 

Agree with me, disagree with me...either way I'm gonna bust your chops when I can.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Current Topic - Signs  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Sanity Held Hostage  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

Click here to visit the homepage of the idiot who runs this board

Click on the button to see Rick's masterpiece of a homepage