Except that I don't believe that Tea said randomtimers were not really random. What she, and several other people said, is that they are, but there are practical limitations about how many you can run at once for how many events (although I have three or four sets with at least 6 and a couple running 12 or more at once with no problems... I take that back, one of the 12+ sets has not been released because it works fine on Mac but not IBM). I also mentioned that at least one viewer behaves badly when given a short random interval. That seemed to be what you described. When I was beta testing one set on an IBM I couldn't get a random result (it worked perfectly well on Mac). When I increased the random interval it worked properly on the IBM viewer also.
Like Dov I may have read too much into the question. I thought you were saying you weren't getting random results in a set you had made and I suggested the interval might be the problem.
Posted on Mar 18, 2002, 9:26 PM from IP address 12.75.143.97